Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fisheries; 2011 Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Specifications; Preliminary 2011 Quota Adjustments; 2011 Summer Flounder Quota for Delaware, 81498-81505 [2010-32656]
Download as PDF
81498
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Communications equipment,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as
follows:
■
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336
and 339.
2. Section 73.686 is amended by
revising the heading of paragraph (d)
and by adding a new paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
■
§ 73.686
Field strength measurements.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) NTSC—Collection of field strength
data to determine NTSC television
signal intensity at an individual
location—cluster measurements—
*
*
*
*
*
(e) DTV—Collection of field strength
data to determine digital television
signal intensity at an individual
location—cluster measurements—(1)
Preparation for measurements—
(i) Testing antenna. The test antenna
shall be either a standard half-wave
dipole tuned to the center frequency of
the channel being tested or a gain
antenna provided its antenna factor for
the channel(s) under test has been
determined. Use the antenna factor
supplied by the antenna manufacturer
as determined on an antenna range.
(ii) Testing locations—At the test site,
choose a minimum of five locations as
close as possible to the specific site
where the site’s receiving antenna is
located. If there is no receiving antenna
at the site, choose a minimum of five
locations as close as possible to a
reasonable and likely spot for the
antenna. The locations shall be at least
three meters apart, enough so that the
testing is practical. If possible, the first
testing point should be chosen as the
center point of a square whose corners
are the four other locations. Calculate
the median of the five measurements (in
units of dBμ) and report it as the
measurement.
(iii) Multiple signals—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:48 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
(A) If more than one signal is being
measured (i.e., signals from different
transmitters), use the same locations to
measure each signal.
(B) For establishing eligibility of a
satellite subscriber to receive distant
network signals, only stations affiliated
with the network in question that are
located in the same Nielsen Designated
Market Area (DMA) as the test site may
be considered and tested.
(2) Measurement procedure.
Measurements shall be made in
accordance with good engineering
practice and in accordance with this
section of this chapter. At each
measuring location, the following
procedure shall be employed:
(i) Testing equipment. Perform an onsite calibration of the test instrument in
accordance with the manufacturer’s
specifications. Tune a calibrated
instrument to the center of the channel
being tested. Measure the integrated
average power over the full 6 megahertz
bandwidth of the television signal. The
intermediate frequency of the
instrument should be set to 100
kilohertz unless the instrument is
specifically designed by the
manufacturer to use an alternative i.f.
setting. The instrument must be capable
of integrating over the selected i.f. for
the 6 megahertz channel bandwidth.
Take all measurements with a
horizontally polarized antenna. Use a
shielded transmission line between the
testing antenna and the field strength
meter. Match the antenna impedance to
the transmission line at all frequencies
measured, and, if using an un-balanced
line, employ a suitable balance. Take
account of the transmission line loss for
each frequency being measured.
(ii) Weather. Do not take
measurements during periods of
inclement weather, including, but not
limited to, periods of heavy rainfall,
snowfall accumulation, high
windspeed, or any combination thereof.
(iii) Antenna elevation. When field
strength is being measured for a onestory building, elevate the testing
antenna to 6.1 meters (20 feet) above the
ground. In situations where the field
strength is being measured for a
building taller than one-story, elevate
the testing antenna 9.1 meters (30 feet)
above the ground.
(iv) Antenna orientation. Orient the
testing antenna in the direction which
maximizes the value of field strength for
the signal being measured. If more than
one station’s signal is being measured,
orient the testing antenna separately for
each station.
(3) Written record shall be made and
shall include at least the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) A list of calibrated equipment used
in the field strength survey, which for
each instrument specifies the
manufacturer, type, serial number and
rated accuracy, and the date of the most
recent calibration by the manufacturer
or by a laboratory. Include complete
details of any instrument not of
standard manufacture.
(ii) A detailed description of the
calibration of the measuring equipment,
including field strength meters,
measuring antenna, and connecting
cable.
(iii) For each spot at the measuring
site, all factors which may affect the
recorded field, such as topography,
height and types of vegetation,
buildings, obstacles, weather, and other
local features.
(iv) A description of where the cluster
measurements were made.
(v) Time and date of the
measurements and signature of the
person making the measurements.
(vi) For each channel being measured,
a list of the measured value of field
strength (in units of dBμ after
adjustment for line loss and antenna
factor) of the five readings made during
the cluster measurement process, with
the median value highlighted.
[FR Doc. 2010–32694 Filed 12–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 101029427–0609–02]
RIN 0648–XY82
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Summer Flounder, Scup, and
Black Sea Bass Fisheries; 2011
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black
Sea Bass Specifications; Preliminary
2011 Quota Adjustments; 2011
Summer Flounder Quota for Delaware
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues final
specifications for the 2011 summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass
fisheries. This final rule specifies
allowed harvest limits for both
commercial and recreational fisheries,
including commercial scup possession
limits. This action prohibits Federally
permitted commercial fishing vessels
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
from landing summer flounder in
Delaware in 2011 due to continued
quota repayment from previous years’
overages.
The actions of this final rule are
necessary to comply with regulations
implementing the Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), as well as to
ensure compliance with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act).
The intent of this action is to establish
harvest levels and other management
measures to ensure that these species
are not overfished or subject to
overfishing in 2011. In addition, this
action implements measures to ensure
continued rebuilding of the summer
flounder stock, which remains under a
Magnuson-Stevens Act rebuilding
program.
DATES: Effective January 1, 2011,
through December 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the specifications
document, consisting of Environmental
Assessment (EA), Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), and other
supporting documents used by the
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea
Bass Monitoring Committees and
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) are available from Dr. Christopher
Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, Suite 201,
800 North State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
The specifications document is also
accessible via the Internet at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov. The Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
consists of the IRFA, public comments
and responses contained in this final
rule, and the summary of impacts and
alternatives contained in this final rule.
Copies of the small entity compliance
guide are available from Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
Northeast Region, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Ruccio, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass fisheries are managed
cooperatively under the provisions of
the FMP developed by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council)
and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (Commission), in
consultation with the New England and
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils. The management units
specified in the FMP include summer
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) in U.S.
waters of the Atlantic Ocean from the
southern border of North Carolina (NC)
northward to the U.S./Canada border,
and scup (Stenotomus chrysops) and
black sea bass (Centropristis striata) in
U.S. waters of the Atlantic Ocean from
35°13.3′ N. lat. (the latitude of Cape
Hatteras Lighthouse, Buxton, NC)
northward to the U.S./Canada border.
The Council prepared the FMP under
the authority of the MagnusonStevenson Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations implementing the FMP
appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A
(general provisions), G (summer
flounder), H (scup), and I (black sea
bass). General regulations governing
U.S. fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part
600. States manage summer flounder
within 3 nautical miles of their coasts,
under the Commission’s plan for
summer flounder, scup, and black sea
bass. The Federal regulations govern
vessels fishing in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ), as well as vessels
possessing a Federal fisheries permit,
regardless of where they fish.
The regulations implementing the
FMP outline the process for specifying
the annual catch limits for the summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass
commercial and recreational fisheries,
as well as other management measures
(e.g., mesh requirements, minimum fish
sizes, gear restrictions, possession
restrictions, and area restrictions) for
these fisheries. Once the catch limits are
established, they are divided into quotas
based on formulas contained in the
FMP. Detailed background information
regarding the status of the summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass
stocks and the development of the 2011
specifications for these fisheries was
provided in the proposed specifications
(75 FR 70192; November 17, 2010). That
information is not repeated here.
NMFS will establish the 2011
recreational management measures (i.e.,
minimum fish size, possession limits,
and fishing seasons) for summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass by
publishing proposed and final rules in
the Federal Register at a later date, after
the Council concludes its deliberations
and submits its recommendations as
specified in the FMP.
Changes From the Proposed to Final
Specifications Rule
The FMP provides that up to 3
percent of landing levels may be set
aside for research. The proposed rule
proposed the maximum amounts (3
percent) of the Total Allowable
Landings (TALs) be set aside for
summer flounder (884,400 lb (401 mt)),
scup (600,000 lb (272 mt)) and black sea
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
81499
bass (108,000 lb (49 mt)); however, the
full 3 percent was not awarded for
either summer flounder or scup in the
final grant awards for the 2011 RSA
program. Only 521,441 lb (237 mt) of
summer flounder and 396,500 lb (180
mt) of scup were awarded as 2011 RSA.
Thus, this rule increases slightly the
commercial quotas and recreational
harvest limits for both summer flounder
and scup to account for the final RSA
amounts. No changes occurred to the
black sea bass specifications as the 3
percent was fully utilized by the 2011
grant awards process. No other changes
occurred from the proposed to final
specifications rule.
2011 Specifications
This final rule implements the
following specifications:
Summer Flounder: A TAL of 29.48
million lb (13,372 mt), including RSA of
521,441 lb (237 mt); a commercial quota
of 17,375,135 lb (7,881 mt); and a
recreational harvest limit of 11,583,424
lb (5,254 mt).
Scup: A Total Allowable Catch (TAC)
of 24.1 million lb (10,932 mt); a 20.0
million lb TAL (9,072 mt), including
RSA of 396,500 lb (180 mt); a
commercial quota of 15,600,000 lb
(7,076 mt); and a recreational harvest
limit of 4,312,770 lb (1,956 mt). NMFS
acknowledges that the Council, at its
December 15, 2010, meeting, voted to
recommend an increase to the 2011
scup TAC, TAL, commercial quota, and
recreational harvest limit. This
recommendation is still under
development and consideration and will
be addressed through separate
rulemaking, if needed.
Black Sea Bass: A TAL of 3,600,000
lb (1,633 mt), including RSA of 108,000
lb (49 mt); a commercial quota of
1,711,080 lb (776 mt); and a recreational
harvest limit of 1,780,920 lb (808 mt).
Additional detail for each species’
specifications is provided, as follows.
Summer Flounder
Summer flounder remain under a
stock rebuilding program and must
achieve the rebuilding biomass target
(i.e., BMSY (Maximum Sustainable Yield)) by
January 1, 2013. Analysis conducted by
the Southern Demersal Working Group
(SDWG) indicates that the 2011 summer
flounder TAL implemented by this rule
is projected to provide the necessary
stock growth to achieve the rebuilding
objective within the specified time
frame. This TAL also satisfies a 2000
Federal Court Order (Natural Resources
Defense Council v. Daley, Civil No. 1:99
CV 00221 (JLG)) which requires the
annual summer flounder TAL to have at
least a 50-percent probability of success.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
81500
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
This TAL has a 50-percent probability of
constraining fishing mortality below the
management target of F40 percent = 0.255
and a 98-percent probability of
constraining fishing mortality below the
overfishing threshold of FMSY proxy =
0.310.
each State, the commercial summer
flounder percent shares as outlined in
§ 600.100(d)(1)(I), the resultant 2011
commercial quota (both initial and less
the RSA), the quota overages as
described above, and the final adjusted
2011 commercial quota, less the RSA.
Consistent with the revised quota
setting procedures for the FMP (67 FR
6877, February 14, 2002), summer
flounder overages are determined based
upon landings for the period January–
October 2010, plus any previously
unaccounted for overages from January–
December 2009. Table 1 summarizes, for
TABLE 1—FINAL STATE-BY-STATE COMMERCIAL SUMMER FLOUNDER ALLOCATIONS FOR 2011
Initial quota (TAL)
FMP percent
share
State
ME .........................
NH .........................
MA .........................
RI ...........................
CT ..........................
NY .........................
NJ ..........................
DE .........................
MD .........................
VA ..........................
NC .........................
Total ...............
0.04756
0.00046
6.82046
15.68298
2.25708
7.64699
16.72499
0.01779
2.03910
21.31676
27.44584
100.00
lb
kg
Initial quota, less RSA
lb
2010 Quota overages
(through 10/31/10)
kg
lb
kg
Adjusted quota, less RSA
lb
kg
8,412
81
1,206,403
2,774,006
399,232
1,352,600
2,958,316
3,147
360,676
3,770,509
4,854,620
3,816
37
547,224
1,258,289
181,092
613,539
1,341,892
1,427
163,603
1,710,303
2,202,056
8,264
80
1,185,064
2,724,939
392,171
1,328,675
2,905,990
3,091
354,296
3,703,816
4,768,752
3,748
36
537,545
1,236,032
177,889
602,687
1,318,157
1,402
160,709
1,680,051
2,163,106
0
0
28,112
0
0
0
0
56,259
55,966
0
0
0
0
12,752
0
0
0
0
25,519
25,386
0
0
8,264
80
1,156,952
2,724,939
392,171
1,328,675
2,905,990
¥53,168
298,330
3,703,816
4,768,752
3,749
36
524,793
1,236,032
177,889
602,687
1,318,157
¥24,117
135,322
1,680,051
2,163,106
17,688,000
8,023,278
17,375,135
7,881,362
140,337
63,657
17,287,969
7,841,823
Notes: 2010 quota overage is determined through comparison of landings for January through October 2010, plus any landings in 2009 in excess of the 2009
quota (that were not previously addressed in the 2010 specifications) for each State. For Delaware, this includes continued repayment of overharvest from previous
years. Total quota is the sum for all States with an allocation. A State with a negative number has a 2011 allocation of zero (0). Kilograms are as converted from
pounds and may not necessarily add due to rounding.
Delaware Summer Flounder Closure
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Table 1 indicates that, for Delaware,
the amount of overharvest from
previous years is greater than the
amount of commercial quota allocated
to Delaware for 2011. As a result, there
is no quota available for 2011 in
Delaware. The regulations at § 648.4(b)
provide that Federal permit holders, as
a condition of their permit, must not
land summer flounder in any State that
the Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, has determined no longer has
commercial quota available for harvest.
Therefore, effective January 1, 2011,
landings of summer flounder in
Delaware by vessels holding commercial
Federal summer flounder permits are
prohibited for the 2011 calendar year,
unless additional quota becomes
available through a quota transfer and is
announced in the Federal Register.
Federally permitted dealers are advised
that they may not purchase summer
flounder from Federally permitted
vessels that land in Delaware for the
2011 calendar year, unless additional
quota becomes available through a
transfer, as mentioned above.
Scup
As previously noted in the preamble
of this rule, the Council voted to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:48 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
recommend an increase to the 2011
scup TAC, TAL, commercial quota, and
recreational harvest limit during their
December 15, 2010, meeting. This
recommendation is still under
development and consideration and will
be addressed through subsequent
rulemaking, as needed. The 24.1 million
lb (10,932 mt) 2011 TAC is divided into
commercial (78 percent) and
recreational (22 percent) allocations, in
accordance with the FMP; the respective
discard estimates are then subtracted to
yield the preliminary TAL of 20.0
million lb (9,072 mt). After deducting
396,500 lb (180 mt) from the
preliminary TAL for 2011 RSA, the
commercial quota is reduced to 15.6
million lb (7,076 mt), with a recreational
harvest limit of 4.3 million lb (1,956
mt).
The commercial TAC, discards, and
TAL (commercial quota) are allocated
on a percentage basis to three quota
periods, as specified in the FMP: Winter
I (January-April)—45.11 percent;
Summer (May-October)—38.95 percent;
and Winter II (November-December)—
15.94 percent. The recreational harvest
limit is allocated on a coastwide basis.
Consistent with the revised quota
setting procedures established for the
FMP (67 FR 6877, February 14, 2002),
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
scup overages are determined based
upon landings for the Winter I and
Summer 2010 periods, plus any
previously unaccounted for landings
from the 2009 Winter II period. There
were no preliminary overages of the
2010 Winter I or Summer Period quotas
or previously unaccounted for overages
of any 2009 quota periods; therefore, no
adjustment to the 2011 scup
specifications is required in this final
rule. Any overage of the 2010 Winter II
period will be addressed in July 2011,
prior to the start of the 2011 Winter II
fishery.
Per the quota accounting procedures
in the FMP, after June 30, 2011, NMFS
will compile all available landings data
for the 2010 Winter II quota period and
compare the landings to the 2010
Winter II quota period allocation,
inclusive of any transfer from the 2010
Winter I quota period. Any overages
will be determined, and deductions, if
needed, will be made to the Winter II
2011 allocation and published in the
Federal Register. Table 2 contains the
quota period allocations for the 2011
commercial scup fishery.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
45.11
38.95
15.94
Percent
share
20:48 Dec 27, 2010
100.0
18,798,000
8,527
3,846
3,321
1,359
mt
3,198,000
1,442,618
1,245,621
509,761
lb
645
565
231
1,451
mt
Estimated discards
15,600,000
7,037,160
6,076,200
2,486,640
lb
Initial quota
7,076
3,192
2,756
1,128
mt
lb
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
mt
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Initial quota less overages (through 10/31/
2009)
15,290,730
6,897,648
5,955,738
2,437,342
lb
6,936
3,129
2,701
1,106
mt
Adjusted quota less overages and RSA
N/A
30,000
N/A
2,000
lb
N/A
13,608
N/A
907
kg
Federal possession
limits (per trip)
Notes: The Winter I possession limit will drop to 1,000 lb (454 kg) upon attainment of 80 percent of that period’s allocation. The Winter II possession limit may be adjusted (in association with a transfer of unused
Winter I quota to the Winter II period) via notification in the Federal Register.
Metric tons are as converted from pounds and may not necessarily add due to rounding.
N/A = Not applicable.
Total ...............................................
8,479,778
7,321,821
2,996,401
lb
Total allowable catch
TABLE 2—INITIAL COMMERCIAL SCUP QUOTA ALLOCATIONS FOR 2011 BY QUOTA PERIOD
Winter I .................................................
Summer ................................................
Winter II ................................................
Quota period
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
81501
81502
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Consistent with the unused Winter I
commercial scup quota rollover
provisions at § 648.120(a)(3), this final
rule maintains the Winter II possession
limit-to-rollover amount ratios that have
been in place since the 2007 fishing
year, as shown in Table 3. The Winter
II possession limit will increase by
1,500 lb (680 kg) for each 500,000 lb
(227 mt) of unused Winter I period
quota transferred, up to a maximum
possession limit of 8,000 lb (3,629 kg).
TABLE 3—POTENTIAL INCREASE IN WINTER II POSSESSION LIMITS BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF SCUP ROLLED OVER FROM
WINTER I TO WINTER II PERIOD
Initial Winter II possession limit
Rollover from Winter I to Winter II
lb
kg
lb
mt
Increase in initial Winter II possession limit
lb
Final Winter II possession limit after
rollover from Winter I
to Winter II
kg
lb
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
........................................................
907
907
907
907
907
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Black Sea Bass
The FMP specifies that the annual
TAL is allocated 49 percent to the
commercial sector and 51 percent to the
recreational sector. After deducting
108,000 lb (49 mt) of RSA for the three
selected research projects, the TAL is
allocated to the commercial sector as a
1.76 million lb (798 mt) commercial
quota and to the recreational sector as
a 1.84 million lb (835 mt) recreational
harvest limit.
Consistent with the revised quota
setting procedures for the FMP, black
sea bass overages are determined based
upon landings for the period JanuarySeptember 2010, plus any previously
unaccounted for landings from JanuaryDecember 2009. Landings exceeded the
quota by 33,434 lb (1.5 mt) during the
2009 black sea bass commercial fishery.
However, because 2010 black sea bass
commercial landings to date remain
substantially below the published 2010
quota, no adjustment to the 2011
commercial quota appears necessary at
this time to account for the overage in
2009. If 2010 landings remain below the
difference between the 2010 quota and
the 2009 overage, no adjustment to the
2012 black sea bass quota would be
necessary. If landings exceed the 2010
quota when the complete 2010 fishing
year landings are examined next year,
NMFS will adjust the 2012 commercial
quota, accordingly.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received four comments during
the 15-day comment period for the
November 17, 2010, proposed rule. One
comment from the State of Connecticut
supported all of the proposed
specification measures. Two comments
from recreational fishing groups
supported the summer flounder and
scup proposed measures but opposed
the black sea bass specifications. Some
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
0–499,999
500,000–999,999
1,000,000–1,499,999
1,500,000–1,999,999
2,000,000–2,500,000
0–227
227–454
454–680
680–907
907–1,134
of the issues raised by the commenters
cannot be addressed through the
Council’s specification process and this
final rule. Specifically, some
commenters raised issues regarding
recreational fishery issues that will be
addressed through the annual
recreational management measures
rulemaking process that began with the
Council’s December 15, 2010, meeting.
In the spring of 2011, NMFS will
conduct notice-and-comment
rulemaking to implement recreational
management measures for these three
species. In addition, some comments
focused on the FMP allocation of scup
between the recreational and
commercial sectors and between scup
commercial quota periods. The
allocations are specified in the FMP and
cannot be modified through the
specification process; such a change
would require either a Council-initiated
FMP framework adjustment or
amendment. The remaining comments
applicable to the 2011 specifications
and RSA projects raised the same or
similar issues; therefore, the significant
issues and concerns are summarized
and responded to here.
Comment 1: Two comments stated
that the proposed 2011 catch levels for
scup would represent a considerable
departure from optimum yield (OY) for
the stock. The comments recognize that
the scup stock is fully rebuilt and assert
that the 2011 catch levels are overly
precautionary.
Response: As was stated in response
to a similar comment submitted for the
2010 specifications, NMFS continues to
interpret the requirement to achieve OY
on a continual basis as producing the
long-term series of catches such that the
average catch is equal to OY, overfishing
is prevented, and long-term average
biomass is near or above BMSY. As such,
National Standard 1, which directs
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
0
1,500
3,000
4,500
6,000
0
680
1,361
2,041
2,722
kg
2,000
3,500
5,000
6,500
8,000
907
1,588
2,268
2,948
3,629
fisheries to be managed for OY, does not
contemplate that the OY will
necessarily be achieved in a single year
given the natural fluctuation of fish
stocks in response to environmental
conditions.
NMFS acknowledges that the 2011
catch level recommendation for scup, as
implemented in this final rule, is
conservative relative to the BMSY values
for the stocks. Indications from the stock
assessment do indicate that the biomass
is well above BMSY and the stock was
declared rebuilt in 2009; however, the
SSC provided a clear rationale for its
2011 ABC recommendation to the
Council, identifying several specific
sources of uncertainty associated with
the stock assessment and citing
concerns about increasing catch levels
rapidly to the MSY level before the
recently new stock assessment first used
for the 2010 fishing year has been
further evaluated relative to fishery
performance. The approach taken by the
SSC and Council in recommending the
2011 scup specifications to NMFS for
implementation through this final rule
is wholly consistent with the National
Standard 1 guidelines (74 FR 3178;
January 16, 2009), which contemplate
reducing catch levels from OY in
situations where the uncertainties
pertaining to the fishery necessitate so
doing. As the level of uncertainty
associated with the scup stock
assessment decreases, either through
improvement in the data, assessment
methods, or through validating
assessment-related output and estimates
through the fishery dependent data and
fishery performance, the SSC should be
able to utilize a less conservative
approach in recommending ABC if the
stock status remains robust, thereby
moving landing levels to near or at
MSY.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Comment 2: Two comments opposed
the black sea bass TAC of 4.5 million lb
(2,041 mt) and TAL of 3.6 million lb
(1,633 mt). The comments state that the
black sea bass stock is rebuilt, not
overfished, and not experiencing
overfishing and that the SSC’s selection
of a constant catch strategy utilizes
inappropriate years of very low harvest
as the foundation of the constant catch
starting point. The commenters request
that NMFS implement a TAC of 5.86
million lb (2,658 mt) and a
corresponding TAL of 4.96 million lb
(2,250 mt), based on the mean TAL from
the years 2002–2009.
Response: NMFS is implementing,
through this final rule, the SSC and
Council recommended TAC of 4.5
million lb (2,041 mt) and TAL of 3.6
million lb (1,633 mt) for the 2011 black
sea bass fishery. The SSC has indicated
that black sea bass biomass remained
stable or increased with a TAC in the 4–
4.5 million lb range (1,814–2,041 mt).
Furthermore, the SSC identified several
sources of uncertainty associated with
determining the overfishing limit (OFL)
and ABC for the black sea bass stock,
and deems the 2011 ABC
recommendation provided and
implemented through this rule as the
basis for deriving the 2011 TAC and
TAL as consistent with the best
available scientific information.
Specifically, the ABC and associated
TAC/TAL implemented through this
rule has been recommended by the SSC
as the level necessary to ensure
scientific uncertainty is mitigated in
2011 so that the black sea bass stock
will have a low likelihood of being
subject to overfishing. The request
submitted a comment on the proposed
rule lacks any sufficient explanation of
how or why the SSC-recommended ABC
is inconsistent with the best available
scientific information. It offers only an
alternative range of years upon which to
base an ABC without any technical
explanation of how this value affects the
stock or prevents overfishing. Instead,
the commenters cite, without any
specific justification data, a potential
negative socio-economic impact of the
4.5 million lb (2,041 mt) ABC/TAC on
recreational fishermen. While a higher
catch level could potentially reduce
socio-economic impacts as indicated in
the Council’s economic impact analyses,
such levels were considered and
rejected by both the Council and NMFS
as they would be inconsistent with the
goals and objectives of the FMP, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and National
Standard 2 as a higher ABC/TAC would
exceed the recommendation of the SSC
(see FRFA for additional impacts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
discussion). Based on these points,
NMFS cannot disapprove the Council
and SSC-recommended ABC and
implement a higher catch level, as
requested by the two commenters.
Comment 3: Individuals representing
various recreational fishing interest
jointly submitted a comment letter
opposing the proposal to set aside
summer flounder, scup, and black sea
bass TAL in support of the RSA
program. This comment stemmed from
their belief that the RSA program is
funding research that should be funded
by NMFS. They were particularly
concerned by the funding of a nearshore
trawl survey by the RSA program. In
addition, expressed concern that the
project selection process is not
transparent and does not allow for
public input.
Response: For the 2011 fishing year,
the Council chose to reserve up to 3
percent of the summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass TAL for the 2011
Mid-Atlantic RSA Program. Although
projects are ultimately selected by the
Science and Research Director of the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center,
projects must address research priorities
that are identified by the Council. The
Council receives public input on the
RSA research priorities through RSA
Committee and Council meetings. The
Council’s RSA research priorities for
2011 include resource assessment and
monitoring work, including fishery
independent surveys for all MidAtlantic species, especially in the near
shore zone (as provided by the
NEAMAP survey). As such, funding
work as described under the proposed
rule is consistent with the Council’s
intent for the Mid-Atlantic RSA
program.
In response to the comment that the
selection process lacks transparency, the
proposal solicitation announcement
(Federal Funding Opportunity NOAA–
NMFS–NEFSC–2011–2002247) outlines
the process that NMFS must follow
prior to making any award. This process
ensures successful proposals have high
technical merit and management
relevance. As such, at least three
technical reviewers evaluate each
proposal from a scientific perspective,
and NMFS convenes a meeting with the
RSA Committee to review all of the
proposals. This process ensures that
qualified and relevant projects are
selected in a timely manner and in
compliance with the confidentiality
rules and regulations established by
NOAA Grants.
Therefore, under the 2011 MidAtlantic RSA Program, NMFS will
implement the Council’s decision to setaside summer flounder, scup and black
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
81503
sea bass TAL to support projects that
address the Council’s RSA research
priorities.
Classification
The Administrator, Northeast Region,
NMFS, determined that this final rule is
necessary for the conservation and
management of the summer flounder,
scup, and black sea bass fisheries and
that it is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act and other applicable laws.
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the
30-day delayed effectiveness period for
this rule, to ensure that the final
specifications are in place on January 1,
2011. This action establishes
specifications (i.e., annual quotas) for
the summer flounder, scup, and black
sea bass fisheries, and possession limits
for the commercial scup fishery.
Preparation of the proposed rule was
dependent on the submission of the EA/
RIR/IRFA in support of the
specifications that is developed by the
Council. This document was received
by NMFS in mid-September 2010.
Documentation in support of the
Council’s recommended specifications
is required for NMFS to provide the
public with information from the
environmental and economic analyses
as required in rulemaking. The
proposed rule published on November
17, 2010, with a comment period ending
December 2, 2010. Publication of the
adjusted summer flounder quota at the
start of the fishing year that begins
January 1, 2011, is required by the order
of Judge Robert Doumar in North
Carolina Fisheries Association v. Daley.
If the 30-day delay in effectiveness
were not waived, the lack of effective
quota specifications on January 1, 2011,
would present significant confusion to
the complex cooperative management
regime governing these fisheries. The
summer flounder, scup, and black sea
bass fisheries are all expected, based on
historic participation and harvest
patterns, to be very active at the start of
the fishing season in 2011. Individual
States would be unable to set
commercial possession and/or trip
limits, which apportion the catch over
the entirety of the calendar year. NMFS
would be unable to control harvest in
any way, as there would be no quotas
in place for any of the three species
until the regulations are effective. NMFS
would be unable to control harvest or
close the fishery should landings exceed
the quotas. In addition, the Delaware
summer flounder fishery would be open
for fishing, but in a negative quota
situation. All of these factors would
result in a race for fish wherein
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
81504
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
uncontrolled landings could occur.
Disproportionately large harvest
occurring within the first weeks of 2011
could have distributional effects on
other quota periods, and would
disadvantage some gear sectors or
owners and operators of smaller vessels
that typically fish later in the fishing
season. There is no historic precedent
by which to gauge the magnitude of
harvest that might occur should quotas
for these three species not be in place
during the first weeks of 2011. It is
reasonable to conclude that the
commercial fishing fleet possesses
sufficient capacity to exceed the
established quotas for these three
species before the regulations would
become effective, should quotas not be
in place on January 1, 2011. Should this
occur, the fishing mortality objectives
for all three species and the summer
flounder rebuilding plan could be
compromised.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 because this
action contains no implementing
regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate,
conflict, or overlap with any existing
Federal rules.
A FRFA was prepared pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 604(a), and incorporates the
IRFA, a summary of the significant
issues raised by the public comments in
response to the IRFA, NMFS’s responses
to those comments, and a summary of
the analyses completed to support the
action. A copy of the EA/RIR/IRFA is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES).
The preamble to the proposed rule
included a detailed summary of the
analyses contained in the IRFA, and that
discussion is not repeated here.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Statement of Objective and Need
A description of the reasons why this
action is being taken, and the objectives
of and legal basis for this final rule, is
contained in the preambles to the
proposed rule and this final rule and is
not repeated here.
Summary of Significant Issues Raised in
Public Comments
No changes to the proposed rule were
required to be made as a result of public
comments. None of the comments
received raised specific issues regarding
the economic analyses summarized in
the IRFA or the economic impacts of the
rule more generally. For a summary of
the comments received, and the
responses thereto, refer to the
‘‘Comments and Responses’’ section of
this preamble.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities To Which the Rule Will
Apply
The categories of small entities likely
to be affected by this action include
commercial and charter/party vessel
owners holding an active Federal
commercial or charter/party permit for
summer flounder, scup, or black sea
bass, as well as owners of vessels that
fish for any of these species in State
waters. The Council estimates that the
proposed 2011 specifications could
affect 2,206 vessels that held a Federal
summer flounder, scup, and/or black
sea bass permit in 2009 (the most recent
year of complete permit data). However,
the more immediate impact of this rule
will likely be realized by the 810 vessels
that actively participated in these
fisheries (i.e., landed these species) in
2009.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final
rule.
Description of the Steps Taken To
Minimize Economic Impact on Small
Entities
Specification of commercial quotas
and possession limits is constrained by
the conservation objectives set forth in
the FMP and implemented at 50 CFR
part 648 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Economic
impacts of changes in year-to-year quota
specifications may be offset by
adjustments to such measures as
commercial fish sizes, changes to mesh
sizes, gear restrictions, or possession
and trip limits that may increase
efficiency or value of the fishery. For
2011, no such adjustments were
recommended by the Council; therefore,
this final rule contains no such
measures. Therefore, the economic
impact analysis of the action is
evaluated solely on the different levels
of quota specified in the alternatives.
The ability of NMFS to minimize
economic impacts for this action is
constrained to approving quota levels
that provide the maximum availability
of fish while still ensuring that the
required objectives and directives of the
FMP, its implementing regulations, and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act are met. In
particular, the Council’s SSC has made
recommendations for the 2011 ABC
level for all three stocks. NMFS
considers this recommendation to be
consistent with National Standard 2.
Establishment of catch levels higher
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
than the SSC ABC recommendations
would require substantial, compelling
argument and documentation that the
recommendations were not, in fact,
based on the best available scientific
information. NMFS-approved measures
for the summer flounder fishery must
also ensure that the statutory
requirements of the stock rebuilding
program are met by the January 1, 2013,
rebuilding deadline.
The economic analysis for the 2011
specification assessed the impacts for
quota alternatives that achieve the
aforementioned objectives. The no
action alternative, wherein no quotas
are established for 2011, was excluded
from analysis because it is not
consistent with the goals and objectives
of the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. Implementation of the no action
alternative in 2011 would substantially
complicate the approved management
programs for these three species. NMFS
is required under the FMP’s
implementing regulations to specify and
implement a TAL (and TAC for scup)
for these fisheries on an annual basis.
The no action alternative would result
in no fishing limits for 2011, and could
result in overfishing of the resources
and substantially compromise the
mortality and/or stock rebuilding
objectives for each species.
Furthermore, Alternative 2 from the
Council’s analysis contains the most
restrictive TAL options (i.e., the lowest
catch levels—summer flounder, 22.13
million lb (10,038 mt); scup, 14.11
million lb (6,400 mt); black sea bass,
2.30 million lb (1,043 mt)). While this
alternative would achieve the required
objectives for all three species, it carries
the highest potential negative impact on
small entities in the form of foregone
fishing opportunity. Alternative 2 was
not preferred by the Council or NMFS
because other alternatives considered
have lower impacts on small entities
while achieving the stated objectives of
the 2011 specification process.
Alternative 3 (least restrictive quotas;
highest catch levels—summer flounder,
35.05 million lb (15,898 mt); scup, 28.96
million lb (13,136 mt); and black sea
bass, 4.35 million lb (1,973 mt)) would
produce the smallest impact on small
entities. For all three species, the
respective quotas under Alternative 3
are inconsistent with the SSC’s catch
level recommendations. Because the
respective Alternative 3 measures
would establish annual fishing limits
that exceed the fishing level
recommendations of the Council’s SSC,
they are inconsistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements
and cannot be implemented for 2011,
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
despite having the lowest associated
impact on small entities.
Through this final rule, NMFS
implements the summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass TALs contained in
Alternative 1 (summer flounder, 29.48
million lb (13,372 mt); scup, 20.0
million lb (9,072 mt); and black sea
bass, 3.6 million lb (1,633 mt)), the
Council’s preferred alternatives, which
consist of the quota alternatives that
pair the lowest economic impacts to
small entities and meet the required
objectives of the FMP and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Relative to
2010, the 2011 commercial quotas and
recreational harvest measures in this
action would result in the following
TAL changes for the commercial and
recreational sectors:
(1) A 33.2-percent increase for
summer flounder;
(2) A 41.7-percent increase for scup;
and
(3) A 2.7-percent reduction for black
sea bass.
The respective TALs contained in
Alternative 1 for all three species were
selected because they satisfy NMFS’s
obligation to implement specifications
that are consistent with the goals,
objectives, and requirements of the
FMP, its implementing regulations, and
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The F rates
associated with the TALs for all three
species all have very low likelihoods of
causing overfishing to occur in 2011.
TAL Alternative 1 for summer flounder
is also projected to provide the
necessary continued stock rebuilding to
achieve the SSBMSY by the rebuilding
period ending date of January 1, 2013.
The revenue decreases associated
with allocating a portion of available
catch to the RSA program are expected
to be minimal, and are expected to yield
important benefits associated with
improved fisheries data. It should also
be noted that fish harvested under the
RSA program can be sold, and the
profits used to offset the costs of
research. As such, total gross revenues
to the industry are not expected to
decrease substantially, if at all, as a
result of this final rule authorizing RSA
for 2011.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity compliance
guides.’’ The agency shall explain the
actions a small entity is required to take
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Dec 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
to comply with a rule or group of rules.
As part of this rulemaking process, a
small entity compliance guide will be
sent to all holders of Federal permits
issued for the summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass fisheries. In addition,
copies of this final rule and guide (i.e.,
permit holder letter) are available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and at the
following Web site: https://
www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 21, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–32656 Filed 12–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 101116568–0608–01]
RIN 0648–BA42
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Tilefish
Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Interim final rule, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this interim
final rule to amend the cost recovery
regulations implementing the Tilefish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) to
require the first year cost-recovery fee
percentage to be calculated based on the
best estimate of the actual costs
associated with the management, data
collection and analysis, and
enforcement of the individual fishing
quota (IFQ) allocation program (not to
exceed 3 percent), rather than to be set
at the statutory maximum 3 percent of
the ex-vessel value of tilefish landings.
DATES: This rule is effective December
28, 2010. Written comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m. eastern
standard time, on January 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: This document and other
supporting material are available online
at https://www.regulations.gov or https://
www.nero.nmfs.gov. You may submit
comments, identified by RIN number
0648–BA42, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
81505
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn:
Christopher Biegel.
• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the
outside of the envelope: ‘‘Comments on
Tilefish Cost-Recovery Regulatory
Amendment.’’
Instructions: All comments received
are part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted via
Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Biegel, Fishery
Management Specialist, phone (978)
281–9112.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Limited access privilege programs
(LAPPs) are a management tool
authorized under section 303A of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) that allow a
permit holder exclusive harvest of a
portion of the total allowable catch of a
fishery, but does not confer any right or
title to any fish before the fish is
harvested by the holder. An IFQ is a
form of LAPP where the harvest permit
is issued to an individual. Cost-recovery
for LAPPs is mandated by section
304(d)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
which states that ‘‘the Secretary * * *
shall collect a fee to recover the actual
costs directly related to the
management, data collection, and
enforcement of any limited access
privilege program.’’
The tilefish fishery is managed by the
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council) through the Tilefish
FMP. The final rule implementing
Amendment 1 to the FMP (74 FR 42580,
August 24, 2009) established an IFQ
program which included the required
cost-recovery provisions.
Fees are collected to recover the costs
associated with management, data
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 81498-81505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32656]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 101029427-0609-02]
RIN 0648-XY82
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fisheries; 2011 Summer Flounder, Scup, and
Black Sea Bass Specifications; Preliminary 2011 Quota Adjustments; 2011
Summer Flounder Quota for Delaware
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues final specifications for the 2011 summer flounder,
scup, and black sea bass fisheries. This final rule specifies allowed
harvest limits for both commercial and recreational fisheries,
including commercial scup possession limits. This action prohibits
Federally permitted commercial fishing vessels
[[Page 81499]]
from landing summer flounder in Delaware in 2011 due to continued quota
repayment from previous years' overages.
The actions of this final rule are necessary to comply with
regulations implementing the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan (FMP), as well as to ensure compliance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act).
The intent of this action is to establish harvest levels and other
management measures to ensure that these species are not overfished or
subject to overfishing in 2011. In addition, this action implements
measures to ensure continued rebuilding of the summer flounder stock,
which remains under a Magnuson-Stevens Act rebuilding program.
DATES: Effective January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the specifications document, consisting of
Environmental Assessment (EA), Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), and other supporting documents used by the Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committees and Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) are available from Dr. Christopher Moore,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201,
800 North State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The specifications document is
also accessible via the Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov. The Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) consists of the IRFA, public
comments and responses contained in this final rule, and the summary of
impacts and alternatives contained in this final rule. Copies of the
small entity compliance guide are available from Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, Northeast Region, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Ruccio, Fishery Policy
Analyst, (978) 281-9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass fisheries are managed
cooperatively under the provisions of the FMP developed by the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission), in consultation with the New
England and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils. The management
units specified in the FMP include summer flounder (Paralichthys
dentatus) in U.S. waters of the Atlantic Ocean from the southern border
of North Carolina (NC) northward to the U.S./Canada border, and scup
(Stenotomus chrysops) and black sea bass (Centropristis striata) in
U.S. waters of the Atlantic Ocean from 35[deg]13.3' N. lat. (the
latitude of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse, Buxton, NC) northward to the
U.S./Canada border. The Council prepared the FMP under the authority of
the Magnuson-Stevenson Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations
implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A (general
provisions), G (summer flounder), H (scup), and I (black sea bass).
General regulations governing U.S. fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part
600. States manage summer flounder within 3 nautical miles of their
coasts, under the Commission's plan for summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass. The Federal regulations govern vessels fishing in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ), as well as vessels possessing a Federal
fisheries permit, regardless of where they fish.
The regulations implementing the FMP outline the process for
specifying the annual catch limits for the summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass commercial and recreational fisheries, as well as other
management measures (e.g., mesh requirements, minimum fish sizes, gear
restrictions, possession restrictions, and area restrictions) for these
fisheries. Once the catch limits are established, they are divided into
quotas based on formulas contained in the FMP. Detailed background
information regarding the status of the summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass stocks and the development of the 2011 specifications
for these fisheries was provided in the proposed specifications (75 FR
70192; November 17, 2010). That information is not repeated here.
NMFS will establish the 2011 recreational management measures
(i.e., minimum fish size, possession limits, and fishing seasons) for
summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass by publishing proposed and
final rules in the Federal Register at a later date, after the Council
concludes its deliberations and submits its recommendations as
specified in the FMP.
Changes From the Proposed to Final Specifications Rule
The FMP provides that up to 3 percent of landing levels may be set
aside for research. The proposed rule proposed the maximum amounts (3
percent) of the Total Allowable Landings (TALs) be set aside for summer
flounder (884,400 lb (401 mt)), scup (600,000 lb (272 mt)) and black
sea bass (108,000 lb (49 mt)); however, the full 3 percent was not
awarded for either summer flounder or scup in the final grant awards
for the 2011 RSA program. Only 521,441 lb (237 mt) of summer flounder
and 396,500 lb (180 mt) of scup were awarded as 2011 RSA. Thus, this
rule increases slightly the commercial quotas and recreational harvest
limits for both summer flounder and scup to account for the final RSA
amounts. No changes occurred to the black sea bass specifications as
the 3 percent was fully utilized by the 2011 grant awards process. No
other changes occurred from the proposed to final specifications rule.
2011 Specifications
This final rule implements the following specifications:
Summer Flounder: A TAL of 29.48 million lb (13,372 mt), including
RSA of 521,441 lb (237 mt); a commercial quota of 17,375,135 lb (7,881
mt); and a recreational harvest limit of 11,583,424 lb (5,254 mt).
Scup: A Total Allowable Catch (TAC) of 24.1 million lb (10,932 mt);
a 20.0 million lb TAL (9,072 mt), including RSA of 396,500 lb (180 mt);
a commercial quota of 15,600,000 lb (7,076 mt); and a recreational
harvest limit of 4,312,770 lb (1,956 mt). NMFS acknowledges that the
Council, at its December 15, 2010, meeting, voted to recommend an
increase to the 2011 scup TAC, TAL, commercial quota, and recreational
harvest limit. This recommendation is still under development and
consideration and will be addressed through separate rulemaking, if
needed.
Black Sea Bass: A TAL of 3,600,000 lb (1,633 mt), including RSA of
108,000 lb (49 mt); a commercial quota of 1,711,080 lb (776 mt); and a
recreational harvest limit of 1,780,920 lb (808 mt).
Additional detail for each species' specifications is provided, as
follows.
Summer Flounder
Summer flounder remain under a stock rebuilding program and must
achieve the rebuilding biomass target (i.e.,
BMSY (Maximum Sustainable Yield)) by January 1, 2013.
Analysis conducted by the Southern Demersal Working Group (SDWG)
indicates that the 2011 summer flounder TAL implemented by this rule is
projected to provide the necessary stock growth to achieve the
rebuilding objective within the specified time frame. This TAL also
satisfies a 2000 Federal Court Order (Natural Resources Defense Council
v. Daley, Civil No. 1:99 CV 00221 (JLG)) which requires the annual
summer flounder TAL to have at least a 50-percent probability of
success.
[[Page 81500]]
This TAL has a 50-percent probability of constraining fishing mortality
below the management target of F40 percent = 0.255 and a 98-
percent probability of constraining fishing mortality below the
overfishing threshold of FMSY proxy = 0.310.
Consistent with the revised quota setting procedures for the FMP
(67 FR 6877, February 14, 2002), summer flounder overages are
determined based upon landings for the period January-October 2010,
plus any previously unaccounted for overages from January-December
2009. Table 1 summarizes, for each State, the commercial summer
flounder percent shares as outlined in Sec. 600.100(d)(1)(I), the
resultant 2011 commercial quota (both initial and less the RSA), the
quota overages as described above, and the final adjusted 2011
commercial quota, less the RSA.
Table 1--Final State-by-State Commercial Summer Flounder Allocations for 2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial quota (TAL) Initial quota, less RSA 2010 Quota overages Adjusted quota, less RSA
FMP percent -------------------------------------------------------- (through 10/31/10) ---------------------------
State share ----------------------------
lb kg lb kg lb kg lb kg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ME............................................................... 0.04756 8,412 3,816 8,264 3,748 0 0 8,264 3,749
NH............................................................... 0.00046 81 37 80 36 0 0 80 36
MA............................................................... 6.82046 1,206,403 547,224 1,185,064 537,545 28,112 12,752 1,156,952 524,793
RI............................................................... 15.68298 2,774,006 1,258,289 2,724,939 1,236,032 0 0 2,724,939 1,236,032
CT............................................................... 2.25708 399,232 181,092 392,171 177,889 0 0 392,171 177,889
NY............................................................... 7.64699 1,352,600 613,539 1,328,675 602,687 0 0 1,328,675 602,687
NJ............................................................... 16.72499 2,958,316 1,341,892 2,905,990 1,318,157 0 0 2,905,990 1,318,157
DE............................................................... 0.01779 3,147 1,427 3,091 1,402 56,259 25,519 -53,168 -24,117
MD............................................................... 2.03910 360,676 163,603 354,296 160,709 55,966 25,386 298,330 135,322
VA............................................................... 21.31676 3,770,509 1,710,303 3,703,816 1,680,051 0 0 3,703,816 1,680,051
NC............................................................... 27.44584 4,854,620 2,202,056 4,768,752 2,163,106 0 0 4,768,752 2,163,106
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................................ 100.00 17,688,000 8,023,278 17,375,135 7,881,362 140,337 63,657 17,287,969 7,841,823
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: 2010 quota overage is determined through comparison of landings for January through October 2010, plus any landings in 2009 in excess of the 2009 quota (that were not previously
addressed in the 2010 specifications) for each State. For Delaware, this includes continued repayment of overharvest from previous years. Total quota is the sum for all States with an
allocation. A State with a negative number has a 2011 allocation of zero (0). Kilograms are as converted from pounds and may not necessarily add due to rounding.
Delaware Summer Flounder Closure
Table 1 indicates that, for Delaware, the amount of overharvest
from previous years is greater than the amount of commercial quota
allocated to Delaware for 2011. As a result, there is no quota
available for 2011 in Delaware. The regulations at Sec. 648.4(b)
provide that Federal permit holders, as a condition of their permit,
must not land summer flounder in any State that the Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS, has determined no longer has commercial quota
available for harvest. Therefore, effective January 1, 2011, landings
of summer flounder in Delaware by vessels holding commercial Federal
summer flounder permits are prohibited for the 2011 calendar year,
unless additional quota becomes available through a quota transfer and
is announced in the Federal Register. Federally permitted dealers are
advised that they may not purchase summer flounder from Federally
permitted vessels that land in Delaware for the 2011 calendar year,
unless additional quota becomes available through a transfer, as
mentioned above.
Scup
As previously noted in the preamble of this rule, the Council voted
to recommend an increase to the 2011 scup TAC, TAL, commercial quota,
and recreational harvest limit during their December 15, 2010, meeting.
This recommendation is still under development and consideration and
will be addressed through subsequent rulemaking, as needed. The 24.1
million lb (10,932 mt) 2011 TAC is divided into commercial (78 percent)
and recreational (22 percent) allocations, in accordance with the FMP;
the respective discard estimates are then subtracted to yield the
preliminary TAL of 20.0 million lb (9,072 mt). After deducting 396,500
lb (180 mt) from the preliminary TAL for 2011 RSA, the commercial quota
is reduced to 15.6 million lb (7,076 mt), with a recreational harvest
limit of 4.3 million lb (1,956 mt).
The commercial TAC, discards, and TAL (commercial quota) are
allocated on a percentage basis to three quota periods, as specified in
the FMP: Winter I (January-April)--45.11 percent; Summer (May-
October)--38.95 percent; and Winter II (November-December)--15.94
percent. The recreational harvest limit is allocated on a coastwide
basis. Consistent with the revised quota setting procedures established
for the FMP (67 FR 6877, February 14, 2002), scup overages are
determined based upon landings for the Winter I and Summer 2010
periods, plus any previously unaccounted for landings from the 2009
Winter II period. There were no preliminary overages of the 2010 Winter
I or Summer Period quotas or previously unaccounted for overages of any
2009 quota periods; therefore, no adjustment to the 2011 scup
specifications is required in this final rule. Any overage of the 2010
Winter II period will be addressed in July 2011, prior to the start of
the 2011 Winter II fishery.
Per the quota accounting procedures in the FMP, after June 30,
2011, NMFS will compile all available landings data for the 2010 Winter
II quota period and compare the landings to the 2010 Winter II quota
period allocation, inclusive of any transfer from the 2010 Winter I
quota period. Any overages will be determined, and deductions, if
needed, will be made to the Winter II 2011 allocation and published in
the Federal Register. Table 2 contains the quota period allocations for
the 2011 commercial scup fishery.
[[Page 81501]]
Table 2--Initial Commercial Scup Quota Allocations for 2011 by Quota Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total allowable catch Estimated discards Initial quota Initial quota less Adjusted quota less Federal possession
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- overages (through 10/ overages and RSA limits (per trip)
Quota period Percent 31/2009) ----------------------------------------------
share lb mt lb mt lb mt ----------------------
lb mt lb mt lb kg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Winter I............................ 45.11 8,479,778 3,846 1,442,618 645 7,037,160 3,192 N/A N/A 6,897,648 3,129 30,000 13,608
Summer.............................. 38.95 7,321,821 3,321 1,245,621 565 6,076,200 2,756 N/A N/A 5,955,738 2,701 N/A N/A
Winter II........................... 15.94 2,996,401 1,359 509,761 231 2,486,640 1,128 N/A N/A 2,437,342 1,106 2,000 907
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 100.0 18,798,000 8,527 3,198,000 1,451 15,600,000 7,076 N/A N/A 15,290,730 6,936 N/A N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: The Winter I possession limit will drop to 1,000 lb (454 kg) upon attainment of 80 percent of that period's allocation. The Winter II possession limit may be adjusted (in association
with a transfer of unused Winter I quota to the Winter II period) via notification in the Federal Register.
Metric tons are as converted from pounds and may not necessarily add due to rounding.
N/A = Not applicable.
[[Page 81502]]
Consistent with the unused Winter I commercial scup quota rollover
provisions at Sec. 648.120(a)(3), this final rule maintains the Winter
II possession limit-to-rollover amount ratios that have been in place
since the 2007 fishing year, as shown in Table 3. The Winter II
possession limit will increase by 1,500 lb (680 kg) for each 500,000 lb
(227 mt) of unused Winter I period quota transferred, up to a maximum
possession limit of 8,000 lb (3,629 kg).
Table 3--Potential Increase in Winter II Possession Limits Based on the Amount of Scup Rolled Over From Winter I to Winter II Period
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Winter II possession limit Rollover from Winter I to Winter II Increase in initial Final Winter II
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Winter II possession possession limit
limit after rollover from
---------------------- Winter I to Winter
lb kg lb mt II
lb kg ---------------------
lb kg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,000...................................................... 907 0-499,999 0-227 0 0 2,000 907
2,000...................................................... 907 500,000-999,999 227-454 1,500 680 3,500 1,588
2,000...................................................... 907 1,000,000-1,499,999 454-680 3,000 1,361 5,000 2,268
2,000...................................................... 907 1,500,000-1,999,999 680-907 4,500 2,041 6,500 2,948
2,000...................................................... 907 2,000,000-2,500,000 907-1,134 6,000 2,722 8,000 3,629
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Black Sea Bass
The FMP specifies that the annual TAL is allocated 49 percent to
the commercial sector and 51 percent to the recreational sector. After
deducting 108,000 lb (49 mt) of RSA for the three selected research
projects, the TAL is allocated to the commercial sector as a 1.76
million lb (798 mt) commercial quota and to the recreational sector as
a 1.84 million lb (835 mt) recreational harvest limit.
Consistent with the revised quota setting procedures for the FMP,
black sea bass overages are determined based upon landings for the
period January-September 2010, plus any previously unaccounted for
landings from January-December 2009. Landings exceeded the quota by
33,434 lb (1.5 mt) during the 2009 black sea bass commercial fishery.
However, because 2010 black sea bass commercial landings to date remain
substantially below the published 2010 quota, no adjustment to the 2011
commercial quota appears necessary at this time to account for the
overage in 2009. If 2010 landings remain below the difference between
the 2010 quota and the 2009 overage, no adjustment to the 2012 black
sea bass quota would be necessary. If landings exceed the 2010 quota
when the complete 2010 fishing year landings are examined next year,
NMFS will adjust the 2012 commercial quota, accordingly.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received four comments during the 15-day comment period for
the November 17, 2010, proposed rule. One comment from the State of
Connecticut supported all of the proposed specification measures. Two
comments from recreational fishing groups supported the summer flounder
and scup proposed measures but opposed the black sea bass
specifications. Some of the issues raised by the commenters cannot be
addressed through the Council's specification process and this final
rule. Specifically, some commenters raised issues regarding
recreational fishery issues that will be addressed through the annual
recreational management measures rulemaking process that began with the
Council's December 15, 2010, meeting. In the spring of 2011, NMFS will
conduct notice-and-comment rulemaking to implement recreational
management measures for these three species. In addition, some comments
focused on the FMP allocation of scup between the recreational and
commercial sectors and between scup commercial quota periods. The
allocations are specified in the FMP and cannot be modified through the
specification process; such a change would require either a Council-
initiated FMP framework adjustment or amendment. The remaining comments
applicable to the 2011 specifications and RSA projects raised the same
or similar issues; therefore, the significant issues and concerns are
summarized and responded to here.
Comment 1: Two comments stated that the proposed 2011 catch levels
for scup would represent a considerable departure from optimum yield
(OY) for the stock. The comments recognize that the scup stock is fully
rebuilt and assert that the 2011 catch levels are overly precautionary.
Response: As was stated in response to a similar comment submitted
for the 2010 specifications, NMFS continues to interpret the
requirement to achieve OY on a continual basis as producing the long-
term series of catches such that the average catch is equal to OY,
overfishing is prevented, and long-term average biomass is near or
above BMSY. As such, National Standard 1, which directs
fisheries to be managed for OY, does not contemplate that the OY will
necessarily be achieved in a single year given the natural fluctuation
of fish stocks in response to environmental conditions.
NMFS acknowledges that the 2011 catch level recommendation for
scup, as implemented in this final rule, is conservative relative to
the BMSY values for the stocks. Indications from the stock
assessment do indicate that the biomass is well above BMSY
and the stock was declared rebuilt in 2009; however, the SSC provided a
clear rationale for its 2011 ABC recommendation to the Council,
identifying several specific sources of uncertainty associated with the
stock assessment and citing concerns about increasing catch levels
rapidly to the MSY level before the recently new stock assessment first
used for the 2010 fishing year has been further evaluated relative to
fishery performance. The approach taken by the SSC and Council in
recommending the 2011 scup specifications to NMFS for implementation
through this final rule is wholly consistent with the National Standard
1 guidelines (74 FR 3178; January 16, 2009), which contemplate reducing
catch levels from OY in situations where the uncertainties pertaining
to the fishery necessitate so doing. As the level of uncertainty
associated with the scup stock assessment decreases, either through
improvement in the data, assessment methods, or through validating
assessment-related output and estimates through the fishery dependent
data and fishery performance, the SSC should be able to utilize a less
conservative approach in recommending ABC if the stock status remains
robust, thereby moving landing levels to near or at MSY.
[[Page 81503]]
Comment 2: Two comments opposed the black sea bass TAC of 4.5
million lb (2,041 mt) and TAL of 3.6 million lb (1,633 mt). The
comments state that the black sea bass stock is rebuilt, not
overfished, and not experiencing overfishing and that the SSC's
selection of a constant catch strategy utilizes inappropriate years of
very low harvest as the foundation of the constant catch starting
point. The commenters request that NMFS implement a TAC of 5.86 million
lb (2,658 mt) and a corresponding TAL of 4.96 million lb (2,250 mt),
based on the mean TAL from the years 2002-2009.
Response: NMFS is implementing, through this final rule, the SSC
and Council recommended TAC of 4.5 million lb (2,041 mt) and TAL of 3.6
million lb (1,633 mt) for the 2011 black sea bass fishery. The SSC has
indicated that black sea bass biomass remained stable or increased with
a TAC in the 4-4.5 million lb range (1,814-2,041 mt). Furthermore, the
SSC identified several sources of uncertainty associated with
determining the overfishing limit (OFL) and ABC for the black sea bass
stock, and deems the 2011 ABC recommendation provided and implemented
through this rule as the basis for deriving the 2011 TAC and TAL as
consistent with the best available scientific information.
Specifically, the ABC and associated TAC/TAL implemented through this
rule has been recommended by the SSC as the level necessary to ensure
scientific uncertainty is mitigated in 2011 so that the black sea bass
stock will have a low likelihood of being subject to overfishing. The
request submitted a comment on the proposed rule lacks any sufficient
explanation of how or why the SSC-recommended ABC is inconsistent with
the best available scientific information. It offers only an
alternative range of years upon which to base an ABC without any
technical explanation of how this value affects the stock or prevents
overfishing. Instead, the commenters cite, without any specific
justification data, a potential negative socio-economic impact of the
4.5 million lb (2,041 mt) ABC/TAC on recreational fishermen. While a
higher catch level could potentially reduce socio-economic impacts as
indicated in the Council's economic impact analyses, such levels were
considered and rejected by both the Council and NMFS as they would be
inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the FMP, the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and National Standard 2 as a higher ABC/TAC would exceed
the recommendation of the SSC (see FRFA for additional impacts
discussion). Based on these points, NMFS cannot disapprove the Council
and SSC-recommended ABC and implement a higher catch level, as
requested by the two commenters.
Comment 3: Individuals representing various recreational fishing
interest jointly submitted a comment letter opposing the proposal to
set aside summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass TAL in support of
the RSA program. This comment stemmed from their belief that the RSA
program is funding research that should be funded by NMFS. They were
particularly concerned by the funding of a nearshore trawl survey by
the RSA program. In addition, expressed concern that the project
selection process is not transparent and does not allow for public
input.
Response: For the 2011 fishing year, the Council chose to reserve
up to 3 percent of the summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass TAL
for the 2011 Mid-Atlantic RSA Program. Although projects are ultimately
selected by the Science and Research Director of the Northeast
Fisheries Science Center, projects must address research priorities
that are identified by the Council. The Council receives public input
on the RSA research priorities through RSA Committee and Council
meetings. The Council's RSA research priorities for 2011 include
resource assessment and monitoring work, including fishery independent
surveys for all Mid-Atlantic species, especially in the near shore zone
(as provided by the NEAMAP survey). As such, funding work as described
under the proposed rule is consistent with the Council's intent for the
Mid-Atlantic RSA program.
In response to the comment that the selection process lacks
transparency, the proposal solicitation announcement (Federal Funding
Opportunity NOAA-NMFS-NEFSC-2011-2002247) outlines the process that
NMFS must follow prior to making any award. This process ensures
successful proposals have high technical merit and management
relevance. As such, at least three technical reviewers evaluate each
proposal from a scientific perspective, and NMFS convenes a meeting
with the RSA Committee to review all of the proposals. This process
ensures that qualified and relevant projects are selected in a timely
manner and in compliance with the confidentiality rules and regulations
established by NOAA Grants.
Therefore, under the 2011 Mid-Atlantic RSA Program, NMFS will
implement the Council's decision to set-aside summer flounder, scup and
black sea bass TAL to support projects that address the Council's RSA
research priorities.
Classification
The Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS, determined that this
final rule is necessary for the conservation and management of the
summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass fisheries and that it is
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delayed effectiveness
period for this rule, to ensure that the final specifications are in
place on January 1, 2011. This action establishes specifications (i.e.,
annual quotas) for the summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass
fisheries, and possession limits for the commercial scup fishery.
Preparation of the proposed rule was dependent on the submission of
the EA/RIR/IRFA in support of the specifications that is developed by
the Council. This document was received by NMFS in mid-September 2010.
Documentation in support of the Council's recommended specifications is
required for NMFS to provide the public with information from the
environmental and economic analyses as required in rulemaking. The
proposed rule published on November 17, 2010, with a comment period
ending December 2, 2010. Publication of the adjusted summer flounder
quota at the start of the fishing year that begins January 1, 2011, is
required by the order of Judge Robert Doumar in North Carolina
Fisheries Association v. Daley.
If the 30-day delay in effectiveness were not waived, the lack of
effective quota specifications on January 1, 2011, would present
significant confusion to the complex cooperative management regime
governing these fisheries. The summer flounder, scup, and black sea
bass fisheries are all expected, based on historic participation and
harvest patterns, to be very active at the start of the fishing season
in 2011. Individual States would be unable to set commercial possession
and/or trip limits, which apportion the catch over the entirety of the
calendar year. NMFS would be unable to control harvest in any way, as
there would be no quotas in place for any of the three species until
the regulations are effective. NMFS would be unable to control harvest
or close the fishery should landings exceed the quotas. In addition,
the Delaware summer flounder fishery would be open for fishing, but in
a negative quota situation. All of these factors would result in a race
for fish wherein
[[Page 81504]]
uncontrolled landings could occur. Disproportionately large harvest
occurring within the first weeks of 2011 could have distributional
effects on other quota periods, and would disadvantage some gear
sectors or owners and operators of smaller vessels that typically fish
later in the fishing season. There is no historic precedent by which to
gauge the magnitude of harvest that might occur should quotas for these
three species not be in place during the first weeks of 2011. It is
reasonable to conclude that the commercial fishing fleet possesses
sufficient capacity to exceed the established quotas for these three
species before the regulations would become effective, should quotas
not be in place on January 1, 2011. Should this occur, the fishing
mortality objectives for all three species and the summer flounder
rebuilding plan could be compromised.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 because this action contains no
implementing regulations.
This final rule does not duplicate, conflict, or overlap with any
existing Federal rules.
A FRFA was prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a), and incorporates
the IRFA, a summary of the significant issues raised by the public
comments in response to the IRFA, NMFS's responses to those comments,
and a summary of the analyses completed to support the action. A copy
of the EA/RIR/IRFA is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
The preamble to the proposed rule included a detailed summary of
the analyses contained in the IRFA, and that discussion is not repeated
here.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Statement of Objective and Need
A description of the reasons why this action is being taken, and
the objectives of and legal basis for this final rule, is contained in
the preambles to the proposed rule and this final rule and is not
repeated here.
Summary of Significant Issues Raised in Public Comments
No changes to the proposed rule were required to be made as a
result of public comments. None of the comments received raised
specific issues regarding the economic analyses summarized in the IRFA
or the economic impacts of the rule more generally. For a summary of
the comments received, and the responses thereto, refer to the
``Comments and Responses'' section of this preamble.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Will Apply
The categories of small entities likely to be affected by this
action include commercial and charter/party vessel owners holding an
active Federal commercial or charter/party permit for summer flounder,
scup, or black sea bass, as well as owners of vessels that fish for any
of these species in State waters. The Council estimates that the
proposed 2011 specifications could affect 2,206 vessels that held a
Federal summer flounder, scup, and/or black sea bass permit in 2009
(the most recent year of complete permit data). However, the more
immediate impact of this rule will likely be realized by the 810
vessels that actively participated in these fisheries (i.e., landed
these species) in 2009.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
No additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are included in this final rule.
Description of the Steps Taken To Minimize Economic Impact on Small
Entities
Specification of commercial quotas and possession limits is
constrained by the conservation objectives set forth in the FMP and
implemented at 50 CFR part 648 under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act. Economic impacts of changes in year-to-year quota
specifications may be offset by adjustments to such measures as
commercial fish sizes, changes to mesh sizes, gear restrictions, or
possession and trip limits that may increase efficiency or value of the
fishery. For 2011, no such adjustments were recommended by the Council;
therefore, this final rule contains no such measures. Therefore, the
economic impact analysis of the action is evaluated solely on the
different levels of quota specified in the alternatives. The ability of
NMFS to minimize economic impacts for this action is constrained to
approving quota levels that provide the maximum availability of fish
while still ensuring that the required objectives and directives of the
FMP, its implementing regulations, and the Magnuson-Stevens Act are
met. In particular, the Council's SSC has made recommendations for the
2011 ABC level for all three stocks. NMFS considers this recommendation
to be consistent with National Standard 2. Establishment of catch
levels higher than the SSC ABC recommendations would require
substantial, compelling argument and documentation that the
recommendations were not, in fact, based on the best available
scientific information. NMFS-approved measures for the summer flounder
fishery must also ensure that the statutory requirements of the stock
rebuilding program are met by the January 1, 2013, rebuilding deadline.
The economic analysis for the 2011 specification assessed the
impacts for quota alternatives that achieve the aforementioned
objectives. The no action alternative, wherein no quotas are
established for 2011, was excluded from analysis because it is not
consistent with the goals and objectives of the FMP and the Magnuson-
Stevens Act. Implementation of the no action alternative in 2011 would
substantially complicate the approved management programs for these
three species. NMFS is required under the FMP's implementing
regulations to specify and implement a TAL (and TAC for scup) for these
fisheries on an annual basis. The no action alternative would result in
no fishing limits for 2011, and could result in overfishing of the
resources and substantially compromise the mortality and/or stock
rebuilding objectives for each species.
Furthermore, Alternative 2 from the Council's analysis contains the
most restrictive TAL options (i.e., the lowest catch levels--summer
flounder, 22.13 million lb (10,038 mt); scup, 14.11 million lb (6,400
mt); black sea bass, 2.30 million lb (1,043 mt)). While this
alternative would achieve the required objectives for all three
species, it carries the highest potential negative impact on small
entities in the form of foregone fishing opportunity. Alternative 2 was
not preferred by the Council or NMFS because other alternatives
considered have lower impacts on small entities while achieving the
stated objectives of the 2011 specification process.
Alternative 3 (least restrictive quotas; highest catch levels--
summer flounder, 35.05 million lb (15,898 mt); scup, 28.96 million lb
(13,136 mt); and black sea bass, 4.35 million lb (1,973 mt)) would
produce the smallest impact on small entities. For all three species,
the respective quotas under Alternative 3 are inconsistent with the
SSC's catch level recommendations. Because the respective Alternative 3
measures would establish annual fishing limits that exceed the fishing
level recommendations of the Council's SSC, they are inconsistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements and cannot be implemented for
2011,
[[Page 81505]]
despite having the lowest associated impact on small entities.
Through this final rule, NMFS implements the summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass TALs contained in Alternative 1 (summer flounder,
29.48 million lb (13,372 mt); scup, 20.0 million lb (9,072 mt); and
black sea bass, 3.6 million lb (1,633 mt)), the Council's preferred
alternatives, which consist of the quota alternatives that pair the
lowest economic impacts to small entities and meet the required
objectives of the FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Relative to 2010,
the 2011 commercial quotas and recreational harvest measures in this
action would result in the following TAL changes for the commercial and
recreational sectors:
(1) A 33.2-percent increase for summer flounder;
(2) A 41.7-percent increase for scup; and
(3) A 2.7-percent reduction for black sea bass.
The respective TALs contained in Alternative 1 for all three
species were selected because they satisfy NMFS's obligation to
implement specifications that are consistent with the goals,
objectives, and requirements of the FMP, its implementing regulations,
and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The F rates associated with the TALs for
all three species all have very low likelihoods of causing overfishing
to occur in 2011. TAL Alternative 1 for summer flounder is also
projected to provide the necessary continued stock rebuilding to
achieve the SSBMSY by the rebuilding period ending date of
January 1, 2013.
The revenue decreases associated with allocating a portion of
available catch to the RSA program are expected to be minimal, and are
expected to yield important benefits associated with improved fisheries
data. It should also be noted that fish harvested under the RSA program
can be sold, and the profits used to offset the costs of research. As
such, total gross revenues to the industry are not expected to decrease
substantially, if at all, as a result of this final rule authorizing
RSA for 2011.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a small entity compliance guide will be sent
to all holders of Federal permits issued for the summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass fisheries. In addition, copies of this final rule
and guide (i.e., permit holder letter) are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and at the following Web site: https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 21, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-32656 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P