Nationwide Use of High Frequency and Ultra High Frequency Active SONAR Technology; Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact, 81284-81286 [2010-32465]
Download as PDF
81284
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–32464 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2010–0094]
National Protection and Programs
Directorate; National Infrastructure
Advisory Council Meeting
National Protection and
Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: Committee Management; Notice
of Federal Advisory Council Meeting.
AGENCY:
The National Infrastructure
Advisory Council (NIAC) will meet on
Tuesday, January 18, 2011, at the JW
Marriott Washington DC, Salon I, 1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20004.
DATES: The NIAC will meet Tuesday,
January 18, 2011, from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30
p.m. The meeting may close early if the
committee has completed its business.
For additional information, please
consult the NIAC Web site, https://www.
dhs.gov/niac, or contact the NIAC
Secretariat by phone at 703–235–2888
or by e-mail at NIAC@dhs.gov.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the JW Marriott Washington DC, Salon
I, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
this meeting is given under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
(Pub. L. 92–463). The NIAC shall
provide the President through the
Secretary of Homeland Security with
advice on the security of the critical
infrastructure sectors and their
information systems.
The NIAC will meet to address issues
relevant to the protection of critical
infrastructure as directed by the
President. At this meeting the
committee will receive work from a
NIAC working group to review,
deliberate on, and provide further
direction to the working group.
Meeting Agenda:
I. Opening of Meeting
II. Roll Call of Members
III. Opening Remarks and Introductions
IV. Approval of October 19, 2010,
Minutes
V. Deliberation: Information Sharing
Study
VI. Public Comment
VII. Closing Remarks
VIII. Adjournment
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
Procedural:
While this meeting is open to the
public, participation in the NIAC
deliberations is limited to committee
members and appropriate Federal
Government officials. Discussions may
include committee members,
appropriate Federal Government
officials, and other invited persons
attending the meeting to provide
information that may be of interest to
the Council.
Immediately following the committee
member deliberation and discussion
period, there will be a limited time
period for public comment on listed
agenda items only. Relevant public
comments may be submitted in writing
or presented in person for the Council
to consider. Off-topic questions or
comments will not be permitted or
discussed. In-person presentations will
be limited to three minutes per speaker,
with no more than 30 minutes for all
speakers. Parties interested in making
in-person comments must register no
less than 15 minutes prior to the
beginning of the meeting at the meeting
location. Oral comments will be
permitted based upon the order of
registration; all registrants may not be
able to speak if time does not permit.
Written comments may be sent to Nancy
Wong, Department of Homeland
Security, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, 245 Murray Lane,
Mail Stop 0607, Washington, DC 20528–
0607. Written comments must be
received by Nancy Wong no later than
January 11, 2011, identified by Federal
Register Docket Number DHS–2010–
0094, and may be submitted by any one
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting written
comments.
• E-mail: NIAC@dhs.gov. Include the
docket number in the subject line of the
message.
• Fax: 703–603–5098.
• Mail: Nancy Wong, National
Protection and Programs Directorate,
Department of Homeland Security, 245
Murray Lane, Mail Stop 0607,
Washington, DC 20528–0607.
Instructions: All written submissions
received must include the words
‘‘Department of Homeland Security’’ and
the docket number for this action.
Written comments received will be
posted without alteration at https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received by the NIAC, go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information on Services for
Individuals with Disabilities:
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
meeting, contact the NIAC Secretariat at
703–235–2888 as soon as possible.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Wong, National Infrastructure
Advisory Council Designated Federal
Officer, Department of Homeland
Security, telephone 703–235–2888.
Signed: December 17, 2010.
Nancy J. Wong,
Designated Federal Officer for the NIAC.
[FR Doc. 2010–32347 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0166]
Nationwide Use of High Frequency and
Ultra High Frequency Active SONAR
Technology; Draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment and Draft
Finding of No Significant Impact
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
announces the availability of the Draft
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment (PEA) for the Nationwide
Use of High Frequency (HF) and Ultra
High Frequency (UHF) Sound
Navigation and Ranging (SONAR)
Technology and Draft Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI). The USCG
is proposing the nationwide use of
active SONAR technologies that operate
at frequencies of 50 kiloHertz (kHz) and
greater from mobile platforms. Active
SONAR technology would be used in
support of USCG missions to locate,
image, and classify submerged/
underwater targets of interest (TOI). The
PEA is a program-level document that
will provide the USCG with
management-level analysis of the
potential impacts of each alternative on
the human and natural environments.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before January 31, 2011, or reach
the Docket Management Facility by that
date.
ADDRESSES: The Draft PEA and Draft
FONSI have been published and can be
downloaded at https://
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USCG–2009–0166. You may submit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
comments identified by docket number
USCG–2009–0166 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Kenneth McDaniel (CG–532), Deputy
Division Chief, Maritime Security
(Counterterrorism), Coast Guard, by
telephone 202–372–2119 or e-mail
Kenneth.L.McDaniel@uscg.mil for
questions regarding the Proposed
Action; or Ms. Kebby Kelley (CG–47),
Program Manager, USCG National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/
Historic Resources, by telephone 202–
475–5690 or e-mail
Kebby.Kelley@uscg.mil regarding NEPA
or to request a paper copy. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments and related materials on the
draft PEA and draft FONSI. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number for this notice (USCG–2009–
0166) and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Notices’’ and insert ‘‘USCG–
2010–1104’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box. Click
‘‘Search’’ then click on the balloon shape
in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit
your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2; by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, click on the ‘‘read
comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2009–
0166’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. If you do not have access to the
Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of comments received
into any of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice
regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal
Register (73 FR 3316).
Background and Purpose
Purpose of Proposed Action
The purpose of the Proposed Action
is to broaden the USCG’s capability to
locate and classify underwater threats
and other TOIs, and to more safely and
effectively accomplish the USCG’s
missions. TOIs could include combat
swimmers/divers; explosives or other
offensive devices that could be
delivered to underwater hulls, piers, or
other shore structures; and objects that
have become submerged as a result of a
natural or man-made disaster and have
the potential to interrupt maritime
transportation, trade, commerce,
recreational boating, or other maritime
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81285
activities. The use of HF (50 to 999 kHz)
and UHF (1,000 kHz and higher) active
SONAR technology would provide
USCG operational commanders with the
ability to locate, image, and classify
underwater threats and other TOIs. HF
and UHF SONAR technology could be
used in response to events such as: The
attacks of September 11, 2001; natural
disasters such as Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita of 2005; established security areas
around high-value vessels,
infrastructure, and special security
events; and maritime environmental
response and search-and-rescue
activities.
The USCG needs to broaden its
capability to locate, image, and classify
submerged/underwater TOIs to safely
and efficiently accomplish mission
activities. The USCG needs to detect
targets in ranges of less than 2
kilometers and needs to operate in
harbor, anchorage, channel, and wharf
environments, including fresh, brackish,
and salt waters, day or night regardless
of visibility and in air and water
temperatures and thermoclines normal
for port/harbor and offshore
environments throughout the United
States. The USCG’s current research of
commercially available and reliable
technology indicates that the
nationwide employment of various HF
and UHF active SONAR technology
systems would provide the needed
capability.
Proposed Use
HF and UHF SONAR use would fall
into one of three general categories: (1)
Operational missions, (2) training and
exercises, and (3) research and
development. All SONAR use would be
of relatively short-term duration
(typically less than a week, unless
otherwise required for an emergency or
disaster). Regardless of the category,
such use would only be for the amount
of time necessary to complete the
mission objectives. In no case is the
USCG proposing long-term deployments
of SONAR equipment in fixed positions
(unless required by an emergency or
disaster). In general, the duration of
SONAR use would be from minutes to
as long as several days. Typically, the
duration of most deployments would be
less than a week; however, for
environmental disasters such as the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill, SONAR
equipment could be used on-site until
the emergency has ended. An example
of a high-priority nonemergency
operational mission is the anti-swimmer
SONAR system that would provide
security zone protection during a twoday special event. Once the event has
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
81286
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
concluded, the system would be shut
down and removed.
The USCG proposes to use HF and
UHF SONAR technology from mobile
platforms nationwide. Mobile platforms
include ships, boats, remotely operated
vehicles (ROVs), and autonomous
underwater vehicles (AUVs).
Additionally, SONAR could be towed
by a boat (i.e., a torpedo-shaped
‘‘towfish’’), lowered from a boat on a
pole, or temporarily fixed to a pier or a
pile. Impacts on the seafloor from ROV
and AUV operations would not be
significant. ROVs would be used
pierside or at a location appropriate for
conducting vessel inspections. An
appropriate location for inspection
would be at a water depth that would
preclude seafloor disturbance. As such,
ROVs and AUVs would usually be
suspended in the water column and
would rarely contact the seafloor.
Typically, ROVs and AUVs would be
used in open, navigable waterways or
safe anchorages. However, an ROV or
AUV might contact the seafloor if there
is a suspected threat on the seafloor that
needs to be investigated; such contact
would be short-term and transient in
nature.
Although selected HF and UHF
SONAR systems could be employed by
any USCG unit to accomplish a mission,
the USCG does not intend to
permanently equip or outfit every USCG
unit with SONAR capability. The HF
and UHF SONAR systems selected
could be powered using existing USCG
power supplies such as public electrical
distribution grids, shipboard electrical
power, or portable generators (e.g.,
Honda 1,000-watt generator).
Scope of the Programmatic
Environmental Assessment
The scope of the PEA focuses on
potential impacts associated with the
anticipated use of the HF and UHF
SONAR systems to accomplish USCG
mission activities. The PEA addresses
potential impacts on living marine
resources based on these operating
criteria. Supplemental, follow-on NEPA
documentation or additional
consultations with appropriate resource
authorities would be required if sitespecific, non-mobile operating scenarios
or newly developed technologies fall
outside of the scope of this assessment.
The scope of the PEA encompasses
geographic locations where the systems
are expected to operate.
The SONAR technology systems
would be available for use by the USCG
within all areas under USCG
jurisdiction along the U.S. continental
coastline, the Great Lakes, Hawaii,
Alaska, United States territories, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
inland operating areas. The inland
operating areas would include existing
harbor infrastructure and adjacent
inland waters, including the St.
Lawrence Seaway, the Great Lakes, and
western and inland river systems. The
offshore operating areas would include
areas up to 12 nautical miles offshore
and most areas shoreward. Normal
locations for deployments would
include the ports and waterways of the
nation’s top tiered militarily and
economically significant ports.
Emergency use of HF and UHF SONAR
technology during times of extreme
weather, such as hurricanes, could be
required for onshore areas that become
inundated by floodwater.
Public input is important to the
preparation of the Final PEA. Your
concerns and comments regarding the
nationwide use of HF and UHF active
SONAR technology and the possible
environmental impacts are important to
the USCG, and we encourage you to
share them with us.
Authority: This notice is issued under
authority of 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq., and 40
CFR 1508.22.
Dated: December 14, 2010.
Michael Mohn,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of
Terrorism and Defense Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–32465 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5376–N–124]
Emergency Comment Request; Indian
Housing Block Grants (IHBG) Program
Reporting; Notice of Submission of
Proposed Information Collection to
OMB; Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for Public Comment
Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information
collection.
AGENCY:
The proposed information
collection requirement described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
emergency review and approval, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The Department is soliciting public
comments on the subject proposal. This
is a correction from 14 days to 30 days.
DATES: Comments Due Date: January 26,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments must be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received within thirty (30) days from the
date of this Notice. Comments should
refer to the proposal by name or OMB
approval number (2577–0218) and
should be sent to: Ross A. Rutledge,
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; e-mail:
Ross.A.Rutledge@omb.eop.gov; Fax:
202–395–3086.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Departmental Reports
Management Officer, QDAM,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410; e-mail
Colette.Pollard@HUD.gov; telephone
(202) 402–3400. This is not a toll-free
number. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
request for emergency processing is
essential in order to implement the
statutory changes to NAHASDA for
fiscal year 2012. A standard PRA review
would delay implementation of the
revised IHP/APR until fiscal year 2013.
The agency cannot reasonably comply
with the normal clearance procedures
under this part because the statutory
changes accelerate the submission of the
IHP. With implementation of the
statutory changes, the IHP is due 75
days prior to the beginning of the
grantee’s fiscal year. For grantees with a
fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011,
the revised IHP will be due July 16,
2011, rather than July 1, 2012. The
emergency clearance processing of the
revised PRA is needed in order to
provide IHBG recipients with sufficient
time to complete the IHP prior to
submission and provide training to all
IHBG recipients on the revised form.
Therefore, the use of the normal
clearance procedures is reasonably
likely to prevent or disrupt the
collection of information and is
reasonably likely to cause a statutory
deadline to be missed.
This Notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Indian Housing
Block Grants (IHBG) Program Reporting.
Description of Information Collection:
Recipients of Indian Housing Block
Grant (IHBG) funds provide plans for
low-income housing programs in their
communities and submit quarterly
reports on funds drawn. Recipients may
submit information to correct and/or
challenge data used in annual housing
assistance formula allocations.
Additional requirements have been
added: Recipients may purchase
insurance from a nonprofit insurance
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81284-81286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32465]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0166]
Nationwide Use of High Frequency and Ultra High Frequency Active
SONAR Technology; Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment and Draft
Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) announces the availability of the
Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) for the Nationwide
Use of High Frequency (HF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Sound
Navigation and Ranging (SONAR) Technology and Draft Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI). The USCG is proposing the nationwide use of
active SONAR technologies that operate at frequencies of 50 kiloHertz
(kHz) and greater from mobile platforms. Active SONAR technology would
be used in support of USCG missions to locate, image, and classify
submerged/underwater targets of interest (TOI). The PEA is a program-
level document that will provide the USCG with management-level
analysis of the potential impacts of each alternative on the human and
natural environments.
DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before January 31,
2011, or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.
ADDRESSES: The Draft PEA and Draft FONSI have been published and can be
downloaded at https://www.regulations.gov, docket number USCG-2009-0166.
You may submit
[[Page 81285]]
comments identified by docket number USCG-2009-0166 using any one of
the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Kenneth McDaniel (CG-532), Deputy
Division Chief, Maritime Security (Counterterrorism), Coast Guard, by
telephone 202-372-2119 or e-mail Kenneth.L.McDaniel@uscg.mil for
questions regarding the Proposed Action; or Ms. Kebby Kelley (CG-47),
Program Manager, USCG National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/Historic
Resources, by telephone 202-475-5690 or e-mail Kebby.Kelley@uscg.mil
regarding NEPA or to request a paper copy. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to submit comments and related materials on the
draft PEA and draft FONSI. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this notice (USCG-2009-0166) and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Notices'' and insert ``USCG-2010-1104'' in the ``Keyword'' box. Click
``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' column.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\; by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov, click on the ``read comments'' box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-
2009-0166'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in
the ``Actions'' column. If you do not have access to the Internet, you
may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice regarding our public dockets in
the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Background and Purpose
Purpose of Proposed Action
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to broaden the USCG's
capability to locate and classify underwater threats and other TOIs,
and to more safely and effectively accomplish the USCG's missions. TOIs
could include combat swimmers/divers; explosives or other offensive
devices that could be delivered to underwater hulls, piers, or other
shore structures; and objects that have become submerged as a result of
a natural or man-made disaster and have the potential to interrupt
maritime transportation, trade, commerce, recreational boating, or
other maritime activities. The use of HF (50 to 999 kHz) and UHF (1,000
kHz and higher) active SONAR technology would provide USCG operational
commanders with the ability to locate, image, and classify underwater
threats and other TOIs. HF and UHF SONAR technology could be used in
response to events such as: The attacks of September 11, 2001; natural
disasters such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita of 2005; established
security areas around high-value vessels, infrastructure, and special
security events; and maritime environmental response and search-and-
rescue activities.
The USCG needs to broaden its capability to locate, image, and
classify submerged/underwater TOIs to safely and efficiently accomplish
mission activities. The USCG needs to detect targets in ranges of less
than 2 kilometers and needs to operate in harbor, anchorage, channel,
and wharf environments, including fresh, brackish, and salt waters, day
or night regardless of visibility and in air and water temperatures and
thermoclines normal for port/harbor and offshore environments
throughout the United States. The USCG's current research of
commercially available and reliable technology indicates that the
nationwide employment of various HF and UHF active SONAR technology
systems would provide the needed capability.
Proposed Use
HF and UHF SONAR use would fall into one of three general
categories: (1) Operational missions, (2) training and exercises, and
(3) research and development. All SONAR use would be of relatively
short-term duration (typically less than a week, unless otherwise
required for an emergency or disaster). Regardless of the category,
such use would only be for the amount of time necessary to complete the
mission objectives. In no case is the USCG proposing long-term
deployments of SONAR equipment in fixed positions (unless required by
an emergency or disaster). In general, the duration of SONAR use would
be from minutes to as long as several days. Typically, the duration of
most deployments would be less than a week; however, for environmental
disasters such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, SONAR equipment
could be used on-site until the emergency has ended. An example of a
high-priority nonemergency operational mission is the anti-swimmer
SONAR system that would provide security zone protection during a two-
day special event. Once the event has
[[Page 81286]]
concluded, the system would be shut down and removed.
The USCG proposes to use HF and UHF SONAR technology from mobile
platforms nationwide. Mobile platforms include ships, boats, remotely
operated vehicles (ROVs), and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs).
Additionally, SONAR could be towed by a boat (i.e., a torpedo-shaped
``towfish''), lowered from a boat on a pole, or temporarily fixed to a
pier or a pile. Impacts on the seafloor from ROV and AUV operations
would not be significant. ROVs would be used pierside or at a location
appropriate for conducting vessel inspections. An appropriate location
for inspection would be at a water depth that would preclude seafloor
disturbance. As such, ROVs and AUVs would usually be suspended in the
water column and would rarely contact the seafloor. Typically, ROVs and
AUVs would be used in open, navigable waterways or safe anchorages.
However, an ROV or AUV might contact the seafloor if there is a
suspected threat on the seafloor that needs to be investigated; such
contact would be short-term and transient in nature.
Although selected HF and UHF SONAR systems could be employed by any
USCG unit to accomplish a mission, the USCG does not intend to
permanently equip or outfit every USCG unit with SONAR capability. The
HF and UHF SONAR systems selected could be powered using existing USCG
power supplies such as public electrical distribution grids, shipboard
electrical power, or portable generators (e.g., Honda 1,000-watt
generator).
Scope of the Programmatic Environmental Assessment
The scope of the PEA focuses on potential impacts associated with
the anticipated use of the HF and UHF SONAR systems to accomplish USCG
mission activities. The PEA addresses potential impacts on living
marine resources based on these operating criteria. Supplemental,
follow-on NEPA documentation or additional consultations with
appropriate resource authorities would be required if site-specific,
non-mobile operating scenarios or newly developed technologies fall
outside of the scope of this assessment. The scope of the PEA
encompasses geographic locations where the systems are expected to
operate.
The SONAR technology systems would be available for use by the USCG
within all areas under USCG jurisdiction along the U.S. continental
coastline, the Great Lakes, Hawaii, Alaska, United States territories,
and inland operating areas. The inland operating areas would include
existing harbor infrastructure and adjacent inland waters, including
the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Great Lakes, and western and inland river
systems. The offshore operating areas would include areas up to 12
nautical miles offshore and most areas shoreward. Normal locations for
deployments would include the ports and waterways of the nation's top
tiered militarily and economically significant ports. Emergency use of
HF and UHF SONAR technology during times of extreme weather, such as
hurricanes, could be required for onshore areas that become inundated
by floodwater.
Public input is important to the preparation of the Final PEA. Your
concerns and comments regarding the nationwide use of HF and UHF active
SONAR technology and the possible environmental impacts are important
to the USCG, and we encourage you to share them with us.
Authority: This notice is issued under authority of 42 U.S.C.
4321, et seq., and 40 CFR 1508.22.
Dated: December 14, 2010.
Michael Mohn,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Terrorism and Defense
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-32465 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P