Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request, 81315-81316 [2010-32423]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices
of protection to all miners at the Bailey
Mine as would be provided by the
existing standard.
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and
Variances.
disclosed. If discussions were open to
the public, these matters that are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act would
be improperly disclosed.
[FR Doc. 2010–32355 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
Dated: December 21, 2010,
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
[FR Doc. 2010–32408 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Earth Sciences Proposal Review
Panel; Notice of Meeting
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting.
Name: Proposal Review Panel in
Earth Sciences (1569).
Date and Time: January 13, 2011, 8:30
a.m.–5 p.m.; January 14, 2011, 8:30
a.m.–4 p.m.
Place: UNAVCO, Inc. Headquarters,
67350 Nautilus Drive, Boulder, CO
80301–5554.
Type of Meeting: Part Open.
Contact Person: Mr. Russell Kelz,
Program Director, Instrumentation &
Facilities Program, Division of Earth
Sciences, Room 785, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd.,
Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703)
292–8558.
Purpose of Meeting: To carry out
review of UNAVCO, Inc. management
and leadership as stipulated in
cooperative agreement EAR–0735156.
Agenda
Closed:
January 13, 2011—8:30 a.m.–9:30
a.m.: organization meeting,
introductions, review of charge to
review panel, discussion of COI.
January 13, 2011—1 p.m.–5 p.m.:
panel discussion, write up of summary
of findings and recommendations.
January 14, 2011—8:30 a.m.–3:30
p.m.: complete panel summary and
recommendations.
Open:
January 13, 2011—9:30 a.m.–12:00
p.m.: Presentation by UNAVCO, Inc.
management and Q&A between panel
and UNAVCO, Inc.
January 14, 2011—3:30 a.m.–4 p.m.:
Presentation of panel draft findings to
NSF/EAR/IF Program.
Reason for Closing: During the closed
sessions, the panel will be reviewing
information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information, financial data such as
salaries, and personal information that
could harm individuals if they are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
[NRC–2010–0322]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
AGENCY:
The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The NRC published a Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
October 18, 2010.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR part 70, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.’’
3. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0009.
4. The form number if applicable:
N/A.
5. How often the collection is
required: Required reports are collected
and evaluated on a continuing basis as
events occur. Applications for new
licenses and amendments may be
submitted at any time. Generally,
renewal applications are submitted
every ten years and for major fuel cycle
facilities updates of the safety
demonstration section are submitted
every two years. Nuclear material
control and accounting information is
submitted in accordance with specified
instructions.
6. Who will be required or asked to
report: Applicants for and holders of
specific NRC licenses to receive title to,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81315
own, acquire, deliver, receive, possess,
use, or initially transfer special nuclear
material.
7. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 1,256 (655 responses
+ 601 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 372.
9. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 89,465 hours
(81,785 reporting + 7,700
recordkeeping) or an average of 125
hours per response (81,765 reporting
burden hours/655 responses) and an
average of 13 hours per recordkeeper
(7,700 recordkeeping burden hours/601
recordkeepers).
10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 70
establishes requirements for licenses to
own, acquire, receive, possess, use, and
transfer special nuclear material. The
information in the applications, reports,
and records is used by NRC to make
licensing and other regulatory
determinations concerning the use of
special nuclear material.
Submit, by February 25, 2011,
comments that address the following
questions:
A copy of the final supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by January 26, 2011. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
given to comments received after this
date.
Christine J. Kymn, Desk Officer, Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0009), NEOB–10202, Office of
Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to
Christine.J.Kymn@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at 202–395–
4638.
The NRC Clearance Officer is
Tremaine Donnell, 301–415–6258.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
81316
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of December, 2010.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–32423 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–341]
Detroit Edison Company; FERMI 2;
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) part 50, appendix E, Section
IV.F.2.b, for conducting a biennial
emergency preparedness exercise for
Facility Operating License No. NFP–43,
issued to Detroit Edison Company (the
licensee), for operation of Fermi 2,
located in Monroe County, Michigan.
Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21,
the NRC performed an environmental
assessment. Based on the results of the
environmental assessment, the NRC is
issuing a finding of no significant
impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application dated
August 3, 2010, as supplemented by
letters dated October 22, 2010, and
November 15, 2010. Following a
telephone conference with the NRC staff
on September 17, 2010, the licensee
determined the postponement of the
exercise into calendar year 2011 to be an
acceptable option to the licensee’s
original request for crediting the
response to a tornado event on June 6,
2010, in place of the 2010 exercise.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
The Need for the Proposed Action
Detroit Edison’s Fermi 2 biennial
evaluated exercise was scheduled to be
conducted on June 8, 2010. However, on
June 6, 2010 at 0217 hours, a tornado
warning was issued for Monroe County
due to a storm front moving through
southeast Michigan. At 0238 hours, a
tornado swept across the Fermi 2
property. At 0253 hours, the Shift
Manager declared an Unusual Event
based on reports of storm damage
within the protected area, including loss
of both 345kV lines for Division 2 of
offsite power supply, and the loss of two
out of three 120kV lines for Division 1
of offsite power supply.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
Review of the actions that occurred
during the June 6, 2010 actual event
supplemented by the drills, exercises,
and other training activities conducted
since the previous biennial exercise,
provides evidence that Fermi 2 has
regularly exercised its emergency
response strategies and personnel in
coordination with the offsite authorities
as required by regulations. In addition,
due to a refueling outage during the
fourth quarter of 2010, an alternative to
schedule and conduct a biennial
exercise in 2010 was ruled out by the
licensee.
The proposed action would exempt
Fermi 2 from the requirements of
conducting a biennial emergency
preparedness exercise in the calendar
year 2010 and postpone it into the
calendar year 2011. Granting an
exemption from the requirement of
conducting the biennial exercise will
not pose an undue risk to public health
and safety and will ensure that focus is
maintained on plant safety and security.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff has completed its
evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the proposed action is an
exemption from the requirements of
conducting a biennial emergency
preparedness exercise. Whether or not
the exercise is conducted would have
no effect on the environment since any
outdoor activity during an exercise is
limited to minimal use of roads and
highways. The staff has concluded that
the changes would not significantly
affect plant safety. The proposed action
would not result in an increased
radiological hazard beyond those
previously analyzed in the Updated
Safety Analysis Report. There will be no
change to radioactive effluents that
affect radiation exposures to plant
workers and members of the public. No
changes will be made to plant buildings
or the site property. Therefore, no
changes or different types of
radiological impacts are expected as a
result of the proposed changes.
There are no federal permits, licenses,
approvals and other entitlements which
must be obtained in connection with the
proposed action. The proposed action is
not subject to any environmental quality
standards or requirements imposed by
Federal, State, regional, or local
agencies having responsibility for
environmental protection.
The details of the staff’s safety
evaluation will be provided in the
exemption issued as part of the letter to
the licensee approving the exemption to
the regulation, if granted.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The proposed action will not
significantly increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes
are being made in the types of effluents
that may be released offsite. There is no
significant increase in the amount of
any effluent released offsite. There is no
significant increase in occupational or
public radiation exposure. Therefore,
there are no significant radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have any foreseeable
impacts to land, air, or water resources,
including impacts to biota. In addition,
there are no known socioeconomic or
environmental justice impacts
associated with such proposed action.
Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). Denial of the application
would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the alternative action are
similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of
any different resources than those
previously considered in the Final
Environmental Statement for the Enrico
Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2,
NUREG–0769, dated August 1981, as
supplemented with Addendum No. 1 in
March 1982.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
on November 22, 2010, the staff
consulted with the State official, Mr.
Ken Yale, of the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources and Environment
regarding the environmental impact of
the proposed action. The State official
had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81315-81316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32423]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2010-0322]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and
solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to OMB for review the following
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and that a person is not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The NRC published a Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on October 18, 2010.
1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information collection: 10 CFR part 70,
``Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.''
3. Current OMB approval number: 3150-0009.
4. The form number if applicable: N/A.
5. How often the collection is required: Required reports are
collected and evaluated on a continuing basis as events occur.
Applications for new licenses and amendments may be submitted at any
time. Generally, renewal applications are submitted every ten years and
for major fuel cycle facilities updates of the safety demonstration
section are submitted every two years. Nuclear material control and
accounting information is submitted in accordance with specified
instructions.
6. Who will be required or asked to report: Applicants for and
holders of specific NRC licenses to receive title to, own, acquire,
deliver, receive, possess, use, or initially transfer special nuclear
material.
7. An estimate of the number of annual responses: 1,256 (655
responses + 601 recordkeepers).
8. The estimated number of annual respondents: 372.
9. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to
complete the requirement or request: 89,465 hours (81,785 reporting +
7,700 recordkeeping) or an average of 125 hours per response (81,765
reporting burden hours/655 responses) and an average of 13 hours per
recordkeeper (7,700 recordkeeping burden hours/601 recordkeepers).
10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 70 establishes requirements for licenses
to own, acquire, receive, possess, use, and transfer special nuclear
material. The information in the applications, reports, and records is
used by NRC to make licensing and other regulatory determinations
concerning the use of special nuclear material.
Submit, by February 25, 2011, comments that address the following
questions:
A copy of the final supporting statement may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance
requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The document
will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer
listed below by January 26, 2011. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of
consideration cannot be given to comments received after this date.
Christine J. Kymn, Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (3150-0009), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to Christine.J.Kymn@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at 202-395-4638.
The NRC Clearance Officer is Tremaine Donnell, 301-415-6258.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[[Page 81316]]
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of December, 2010.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-32423 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P