Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Final Rule to Implement Addenda to 17 Fishing Year (FY) 2010 Sector Operations Plans and Contracts, 80720-80729 [2010-32340]
Download as PDF
80720
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general regulations in
§ 165.23, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zones on VHF–16 or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
415–399–3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6 p.m. to 9:25
p.m. on December 31, 2010 and from
11:45 p.m. on December 31, 2010 until
12:25 a.m. on January 1, 2011.
Dated: December 10, 2010.
C.L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
Effective Date: This correction is
effective December 23, 2010.
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Dennis Foley, Deputy Assistant General
Counsel (025), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–4998.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
VA
published two documents in the
Federal Register, an interim final rule
on May 19, 2008 (73 FR 29024) and a
final rule on February 8, 2010 (75 FR
6098), which implement portions of the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and
Information Technology Act of 2006.
The regulatory text of § 74.4(c)(4) and
(f)(2) contains a typographical error.
This document corrects the
typographical error by removing ‘‘(d)(1)’’
and adding, in each place, ‘‘(f)(1)’’.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 74
Administrative practice and
procedures, Privacy, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
business, Veteran, Veteran-owned small
business, Verification.
William F. Russo,
Director of Regulations Management, Office
of the General Counsel, Department of
Veterans Affairs.
For the reason set out in the preamble,
VA is correcting 38 CFR part 74 as
follows.
■
PART 74—VETERANS SMALL
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 74
continues to read as follows:
■
[FR Doc. 2010–32192 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 513, and as
noted in specific sections.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
§ 74.4
2. Amend § 74.4 as follows:
■ a. In paragraph (c)(4), remove ‘‘(d)(1)’’
and add, in its place, ‘‘(f)(1)’’.
■ b. In paragraph (f)(2) introductory
text, remove ‘‘(d)(1)’’ and add, in its
place, ‘‘(f)(1)’’.
■
38 CFR Part 74
RIN 2900–AM78
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business
Verification Guidelines; Correction
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
[Corrected]
[FR Doc. 2010–32226 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VA published two documents
in the Federal Register, an interim final
rule on May 19, 2008 (73 FR 29024) and
a final rule on February 8, 2010 (75 FR
6098), which implement portions of the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and
Information Technology Act of 2006.
Both documents contain a typographical
error in a cross reference citation. This
document corrects that error.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 100818375–0600–02]
RIN 0648–XX84
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Final Rule to Implement
Addenda to 17 Fishing Year (FY) 2010
Sector Operations Plans and Contracts
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
addenda to add exemptions from certain
Federal fishing regulations to some or
all Northeast (NE) multispecies sector
operations plans that were previously
approved by the final sector rule
published April 9, 2010. That rule
approved FY 2010 sector operations
plans and contracts for, and made
allocations of Annual Catch
Entitlements (ACE) to, 17 sectors in the
NE multispecies fishery. In addition,
this action approves an exemption
functionally equivalent to the Gulf of
Maine (GOM) Haddock Sink Gillnet
Pilot Program for FY 2010 sectors
(proposed in Amendment 16 to the NE
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) for both common pool and sector
vessels, but disapproved by NMFS),
since this program would be more
controlled for sectors and unlikely to
compromise efforts to eliminate
overfishing and rebuild overfished
stocks. The exemptions are intended to
provide additional flexibility and
improve profitability for sector vessels.
DATES: Effective December 23, 2010,
through April 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of addenda to the FY
2010 sector operations plans and
contracts, and the supplemental
environmental assessment (EA), are
available from the NMFS NE Regional
Office: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. These
documents are also accessible via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. A Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
was prepared for this final rule and is
comprised of the EA, the preamble, and
the Classification sections of the final
rule.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Vasquez, Fishery Policy
Analyst, phone (978) 281–9166, fax
(978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposed rule (75 FR 53939) to
implement addenda to the 17 approved
FY 2010 NE multispecies sector
operations plans was published in the
Federal Register on September 2, 2010,
soliciting public comment through
September 17, 2010. A second rule (75
FR 59204; September 27, 2010)
reopened and extended the comment
period to October 1, 2010, to provide
additional opportunity for public
comment on the proposed addenda.
After review of all public comments,
NMFS has partially approved the 17
sector operations plan addenda, with
the exception of one exemption
requested by several sectors,
determining that the addenda are
consistent with the goals of the FMP as
described in Amendment 16, and other
applicable laws, and are in compliance
with the regulations that govern NE
multispecies sector allocation
management as specified in 50 CFR
648.87.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Background
A final rule, published April 9, 2010
(75 FR 18113), approved FY 2010 sector
operations plans and contracts for, and
made allocations of ACE to, 17 NE
multispecies sectors. The Amendment
16 regulations governing the sector
operations plans and contracts allow for
a sector to request exemptions from
Federal fishing regulations through the
sector operations plan and contract
submitted to NMFS for approval on an
annual or bi-annual basis
(§ 648.87(b)(2)(xv)). Pursuant to
§ 648.87(c)(2), the Regional
Administrator may exempt vessels
participating in a sector from certain
Federal fishing regulations, in addition
to the Amendment 16 universal
exemptions already approved for all
sectors. Regulations prohibit sectors
from requesting exemptions that
involve: NE multispecies year-round
closure areas, permitting restrictions
(e.g., vessel upgrades, etc.); gear
restrictions designed to minimize
habitat impacts (e.g., roller gear
restrictions, etc.); and reporting
requirements (not including days-at-sea
(DAS) reporting requirements or Special
Access Program (SAP)-specific reporting
requirements). For FY 2010, the final
rule implementing sectors approved
several new exemptions from NE
multispecies regulations for those
sectors that requested the exemptions
through their FY 2010 sector operations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
plans. Specifically, certain sectors
received exemptions from the following
measures: (1) 120-day block out of the
fishery required for Day gillnet vessels;
(2) 20-day spawning block out of the
fishery required for all vessels; (3)
limitation on the number of gillnets
imposed on Day gillnet vessels; (4)
prohibition on a vessel hauling another
vessel’s gillnet gear; (5) limitation on the
number of gillnets that may be hauled
on Georges Bank (GB) when fishing
under a groundfish/monkfish DAS; (6)
limits on the number of hooks that may
be fished; and (7) DAS Leasing Program
length and horsepower restrictions.
The sectors also requested several
exemptions in the FY 2010 operations
plans that NMFS subsequently
disapproved, because they are
prohibited from being requested or
because similar exemption requests
were being addressed in the
Amendment 16 proposed rule. Among
these was a request by the Sustainable
Harvest Sector to participate in the
GOM Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot
Program, a program proposed in
Amendment 16 that would have
allowed the seasonal use of 6-inch
(15.24-cm) mesh gillnets in the GOM
Regulated Mesh Area (RMA) (as
opposed to the current 6.5-inch (16.51cm) mesh requirement) for the purposes
of targeting GOM haddock.
Upon initial review of the FY 2010
sector operations plans and contracts,
NMFS requested that sectors remove
exemption requests that repeated
measures already proposed under
Amendment 16, including the GOM
Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot Program, to
avoid duplication in the rulemaking
process. The Pilot Program was
subsequently disapproved for all
groundfish vessels by NMFS in
Amendment 16 because of concern that
it could increase catch of overfished
stocks, such as GOM cod, and therefore
undermine the rebuilding programs for
these stocks.
In comments on the proposed FY
2010 sector operations plan rule, the
Sustainable Harvest Sector, the New
England Fishery Management Council
(Council), and 14 others asked what
actions NMFS was considering for
exemption requests such as the pilot
program that were removed from sector
operations plans to reduce duplication
with Amendment 16, but which were
subsequently disapproved in
Amendment 16. NMFS responded in a
March 23, 2010, letter to the Council
that it would work with sector managers
regarding reconsideration of the pilot
program for sectors in a separate
rulemaking given that, for a sector, this
program would be more controlled and
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80721
unlikely to compromise efforts to
eliminate overfishing and rebuild
overfished stocks. At that time, NMFS
noted it would also consider granting
approved sector exemption requests to
all FY 2010 sectors, if appropriate,
through additional rulemaking. As a
result, in April 2010, NMFS solicited
requests from the approved FY 2010
sectors to determine if they would be
interested in an exemption that would
be functionally equivalent to the GOM
Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot Program
(i.e., the ‘‘GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption’’), as well as any additional
exemptions approved in the final sector
rule which their sector had not
previously requested. In response, all 17
sectors submitted requests for addenda
to their operations plans and contracts
to incorporate additional exemptions.
Therefore, 17 addenda to the approved
FY 2010 sector operations plans and
contracts, and the additional
exemptions requested therein, were
proposed in the proposed rule
published September 2, 2010.
Among the exemptions under
consideration in the proposed rule was
a partial exemption from the
requirement to retain and land all legalsized fish of the 14 stocks allocated to
sectors. Regulations at
§§ 648.14(k)(14)(viii) and 648.87
(b)(1)(v)(A) specifically prohibit sector
vessels from discarding legal-sized
regulated species allocated to sectors.
This requirement applies to all fish or
pieces of fish above the minimum size,
including fish that may be considered
unmarketable, such as depredated fish.
Sector members and managers raised
concerns with this requirement,
specifically the retention of
unmarketable fish, stating that the need
to separate the unmarketable fish from
the food-grade product within limited
deck and storage space was creating
operational difficulties and potential
safety hazards at sea. Although this
problem was raised to the Council
during the development of Amendment
16, no exceptions to this requirement
were considered or recommended by
the Council.
To address this concern, the proposed
rule to implement sector operations
plan addenda proposed a partial
exemption in each sector operations
plan from the prohibition on discarding
of legal-sized unmarketable fish of
allocated stocks, provided that the legalsized unmarketable fish are accounted
for in the sector’s discard rate, as
determined through observer coverage,
similar to how other allowable discards
are accounted for. For the purposes of
this exemption, unmarketable fish is
defined as any legal-sized fish the vessel
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
80722
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
owner/captain elects not to retain
because of condition or marketability
problems.
Since proposing this measure in the
proposed rule, new concerns have come
to light regarding implementation of this
measure mid-year, rather than at the
start of the fishing year, given that it
would require the adjustment of sector
discard rates mid-season. NMFS had
intended to revise the sector-specific
discard rates for sectors that opt for the
discarding exemption, to adjust for the
change in possession restrictions and
the handling of legal-sized
unmarketable fish. However, it was
determined that adjusting sector discard
rates mid-season would disrupt the
cumulative year-long dataset used to
monitor sector ACEs. In addition,
implementing this exemption midseason would disrupt some sector’s
discard rates more than others,
potentially raising equity issues.
Therefore, because granting this
exemption without accounting for
revised discard rates would not
adequately track catch of multispecies
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
stocks, this exemption has been
removed as an option in this final rule.
NMFS will instead consider this
exemption for FY 2011 sector operations
plans, which would be effective at the
start of the new fishing year (May 1,
2011) and, thus, would be less
disruptive to sector discard rates.
Approved Sector Exemption Requests
After thorough review and
consideration of public comments on
the exemption requests, NMFS
authorizes exemptions from the
following regulations for all individual
sectors that requested them: (1)
Minimum mesh size for sink gillnets in
the GOM (GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption); (2) 120-day block out of the
fishery required for Day gillnet vessels;
(3) 20-day spawning block out of the
fishery required for all vessels; (4)
limitation on the number of gillnets
imposed on Day gillnet vessels; (5)
prohibition on a vessel hauling another
vessel’s gillnet gear; (6) limitation on the
number of gillnets that may be hauled
on GB when fishing under a groundfish/
monkfish DAS; (7) limits on the number
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of hooks that may be fished; and (8)
DAS Leasing Program length and
horsepower restrictions. A summary of
exemptions authorized for individual
sectors is available in Table 1, and
further details of each exemption are
discussed below.
The supplemental EA prepared for
this action analyzed the impacts of
expanding these exemptions to all FY
2010 sectors, not just those sectors that
requested them. Therefore, although the
addenda implemented through this final
rule add only those exemptions
currently requested by each sector,
NMFS authorizes these exemptions for
all FY 2010 sectors such that a sector
may submit a request for an addendum
to their FY 2010 sector operations plan
to add any of these approved
exemptions at a later date, and NMFS
may review and could approve the
request without additional rulemaking.
Approved addenda would be made
available on the Northeast Regional
Office Web site, or by mail upon request
[see ADDRESSES].
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
1. GOM Sink Gillnet Mesh Exemption
Regulations require a minimum mesh
size of 6.5-inch (16.51-cm) for gillnets in
the GOM RMA (§ 648.80(a)(3)(iv)).
Minimum mesh size requirements have
been used, along with other
management measures, to reduce overall
mortality on groundfish stocks, as well
as to reduce discarding and improve
survival of sub-legal groundfish. This
exemption allows FY 2010 sector
vessels to use 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh
stand-up gillnets in the GOM RMA from
January 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011, to fish
for haddock. Sector vessels utilizing this
exemption are prohibited from using tiedown gillnets in the GOM RMA during
this period. Sector vessels may transit
the GOM RMA with tie-down gillnets,
provided they are properly stowed and
not available for immediate use in
accordance with one of the methods
specified at § 648.23(b). In the proposed
rule, NMFS proposed that Day gillnet
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
vessels would not be able to fish with,
possess, haul, or deploy more than 30
nets per trip during this period.
However, Day gillnet vessels
participating in sectors granted the
exemption from Day gillnet net limits
are exempt from the general net limit in
the GOM RMA, and would be able to
fish up to 150 nets in the GOM RMA at
other times of year. Therefore, to
maximize the flexibility for sector
vessels fishing under this exemption,
NMFS is allowing Day gillnet vessels
participating in a sector granted both the
GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption and
the general net limit exemption to fish
up to 150 stand-up nets in the GOM
RMA during this period (up to 150 nets
total in all RMAs). Day gillnet vessels
participating in a sector that has not also
been approved for the general net limit
exemption will be restricted to the limit
of 50 stand-up sink gillnets during this
period, consistent with existing net
limits in the GOM RMA specified at
§ 648.80(a)(3)(iv)(B)(2). The Letter of
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80723
Authorization (LOA) issued to the sector
vessels that qualify for this exemption
will specify the net restrictions to help
ensure the provision is enforceable.
There is no limit on the number of nets
that participating Trip gillnet vessels are
able to fish with, possess, haul, or
deploy, during this period, because Trip
gillnet vessels are required to remove all
gillnet gear from the water before
returning to port at the end of a fishing
trip.
Recent selectivity studies have
indicated that 6.5-inch (16.51-cm) sink
gillnets may not be effective at retaining
haddock at the current legal minimum
fish size. This exemption would provide
sector vessels the opportunity to utilize
a smaller mesh size gillnet to potentially
catch more haddock in the GOM, and,
thereby, increase efficiency and revenue
in the fishery. NMFS believes that
impacts to allocated target stocks
resulting from this exemption would be
negligible, because fishing mortality by
sector vessels is restricted by an ACE for
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
ER23DE10.003
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
80724
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
allocated stocks, which caps overall
mortality. It is possible that a higher net
limit for Day gillnet vessels
participating in this program could
result in an increase in the number of
gillnets in the water at one time and,
therefore, potentially increase
interactions with protected species.
However, potential negative impacts to
protected species from this exemption
are expected to be low because
additional nets may result in greater
efficiency that could decrease the
overall number of soak hours
throughout the year as a sector’s ACE is
caught faster, thus potentially reducing
interactions with protected species. In
addition, sector vessels utilizing this
exemption are still required to comply
with all requirements of the Harbor
Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (75 FR
12698; March 17, 2010) and Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (73
FR 58942; October 8, 2008). The GOM
sink gillnet mesh exemption is
approved for Northeast Fishery Sectors
II and III, V–VIII, and X–XII, the
Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector,
the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector and the
Tri-State Sector.
2. 120-Day Block Requirement Out of
the Fishery for Day Gillnet Vessels
The 120-day block requirement out of
the fishery for Day gillnet vessels was
implemented to help ensure that
management measures for Day gillnet
vessels were comparable to effort
controls placed on other fishing gear
types, given that gillnets continue to
fish as long as they are in the water.
Regulations at § 648.82(j)(1)(ii) require
that each NE multispecies gillnet vessel
declared into the Day gillnet category
declare out and be out of the nonexempt gillnet fishery for 120 days each
fishing year. Each period of time taken
must be a minimum of 7 consecutive
days, and at least 21 of the 120 days
must be taken between June 1 and
September 30. This exemption was
previously approved for the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector, Sustainable Harvest
Sector, Port Clyde Community
Groundfish Sector, Tri-State Sector, and
Northeast Fishery Sectors III and XI,
based upon the rationale that this
measure was designed to control fishing
effort and, therefore, is no longer
necessary for sectors because sectors are
restricted to an ACE for each groundfish
stock, which limits overall fishing
mortality resulting from sector
operations. Approval of this exemption
for additional sectors would increase
the operational flexibility of sector
vessels and is expected to increase
profit margins of sector fishermen. For
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
additional information on this
exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the
proposed and final rules approving FY
2010 sector operations plans (74 FR
68015 and 75 FR 18113, respectively).
This exemption is approved for seven
additional sectors: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II, V–VIII, X, and XII.
3. 20-Day Spawning Block
Regulations at § 648.82(g) require
vessels to declare out and be out of the
NE multispecies DAS program for a 20day period each calendar year between
March 1 and May 31, when spawning is
most prevalent in the GOM. This
regulation was developed to reduce
fishing effort on spawning groundfish
stocks and an exemption from this
requirement was previously approved
for FY 2010 sectors based upon the
rationale that the sector’s ACE will
restrict fishing mortality, making the
requirement no longer necessary as an
effort control. Exemption from this
requirement is being approved for
additional sectors, because it would
provide vessel owners with greater
flexibility to plan operations according
to fishing and market conditions. For
additional information on this
exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY
2010 sector operations plan rules. This
exemption was previously approved for
the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the TriState Sector, and the Northeast Coastal
Communities Sector. This final rule
approves this exemption for an
additional 13 sectors: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II, III, and V–XIII; the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector; and the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector.
4. Limitation on the Number of Gillnets
for Day Gillnet Vessels
Current gear restrictions in the
groundfish RMAs restrict Day gillnet
vessels from fishing more than: 100
gillnets (of which no more than 50 can
be roundfish gillnets) in the GOM RMA
(§ 648.80(a)(3)(iv)(B)(2)); 50 gillnets in
the GB RMA (§ 648.80(a)(4)(iv)(B)(1);
and 75 gillnets in the Southern New
England (SNE) and Mid-Atlantic (MA)
RMAs (§§ 648.80(b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) and
648.80(c)(2)(v)(B)(1), respectively). This
exemption, as previously approved for
the Sustainable Harvest Sector in the
final sector rule for FY 2010, allows
sector vessels to fish up to 150 nets (any
combination of flatfish or roundfish
nets) in each of the RMAs (up to 150
total), and would provide greater
operational flexibility to sector vessels
in deploying gillnet gear. This
exemption was originally approved, and
is being approved for additional sectors,
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
based upon the rationale that it is
designed to control fishing effort and is
no longer necessary for sector vessels,
since each sector is restricted by an ACE
for each stock, which caps overall
fishing mortality. For additional
information on this exemption, please
refer to the description of this
exemption in the FY 2010 sector
operations plan rules. This final rule
approves this exemption for 12
additional sectors: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II, III, V–VIII, and X–XII; the GB
Cod Fixed Gear Sector; the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector; and the
Tri-State Sector.
5. Prohibition on a Vessel Hauling
Another Vessel’s Gillnet Gear
Northeast Fishery Sectors III and XI
received an exemption for FY 2010 from
current regulations that prohibit one
vessel from hauling another vessel’s
gillnet gear (§§ 648.14(k)(6)(ii)(A) and
648.84(a)) in order to share fixed gear
among sector vessels. This exemption
was originally approved for FY 2010
sectors and is being expanded to allow
sector vessels to reduce costs by pooling
gillnet gear, and because it was
determined that the regulations
pertaining to hauling and setting
responsibilities are no longer necessary
when sectors are confined to an ACE for
each stock. Consistent with the
exemption as originally approved, the
sectors that requested this exemption
proposed that all vessels utilizing
community fixed gear be jointly liable
for any violations associated with that
gear. For additional information on this
exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY
2010 sector operations plan rules. Note
that the description of this exemption in
the FY 2010 sector operations plan rules
and the proposed rule to implement FY
2010 sector operations plan addenda
incorrectly referred to the entirety of
§ 648.84. This exemption was intended
to exempt sector vessels only partially
from § 648.84(a), to allow a sector vessel
to haul gillnet gear marked by another
vessel participating in this exemption.
The regulation citation has been
corrected in this final rule and will be
reflected in the LOA issued to each
sector vessel. This exemption is
approved for an 11 additional sectors:
Northeast Fishery Sectors II, V–VIII, X,
and XII; the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector;
the Sustainable Harvest Sector; the Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector;
and the Tri-State Sector.
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
6. Limitation on the Number of Gillnets
That May Be Hauled on GB When
Fishing Under a Groundfish/Monkfish
DAS
The GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector
received an exemption for FY 2010 from
the limit on the number of gillnets that
may be hauled on GB when fishing
under a groundfish/monkfish DAS.
Current regulations at § 648.80(a)(4)(iv)
prohibit Day gillnet vessels fishing on a
groundfish DAS from possessing,
deploying, fishing, or hauling more than
50 nets on GB, and were implemented
as a groundfish mortality control under
Amendment 13. This exemption was
previously approved, and is being
expanded to additional sectors, because
it would allow nets deployed under
existing net limits of the Monkfish FMP
to be hauled more efficiently by vessels
dually permitted under both FMPs. For
additional information on this
exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY
2010 sector operations plan rules. This
exemption is approved for an additional
12 sectors for FY 2010: Northeast
Fishery Sectors II, III, V–VIII, and X–XII;
the Sustainable Harvest Sector; the Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector;
and the Tri-State Sector.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
7. Limitation on the Number of Hooks
That May Be Fished
The GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector was
granted an exemption for FY 2010 from
the number of hooks that a vessel may
fish on a given fishing trip. Current
regulations at § 648.80 prohibit vessels
from fishing or possessing more than
2,000 rigged hooks in the GOM RMA,
more than 3,600 rigged hooks in the GB
RMA, more than 2,000 rigged hooks in
the Southern New England (SNE) RMA,
or 4,500 rigged hooks in the MA RMA.
This exemption was approved in the
final rule approving sector operations
plans for FY 2010 and is being approved
here for additional sectors because it
would allow sector vessels to more
efficiently harvest ACE and is no longer
a necessary control on effort by sector
vessels. For additional information on
this exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY
2010 sector operations plan rules. This
action exempts 13 additional sectors
from this requirement: Northeast
Fishery Sectors II, III, V–VIII, and X–XII;
the Sustainable Harvest Sector; the Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector;
the Tri-State Sector; and the Northeast
Coastal Communities Sector.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
8. Length and Horsepower Restrictions
on DAS Leasing
While sector vessels are exempt from
the requirement to use NE multispecies
DAS to harvest groundfish, sector
vessels have been allocated and still
need to use NE multispecies DAS for
specific circumstances. For example, the
Monkfish FMP includes a requirement
that limited access monkfish Category C
and D vessels harvesting more than the
incidental monkfish catch must fish
under both a monkfish and a NE
multispecies DAS. Therefore, sector
vessels may still use, and lease, NE
multispecies DAS.
The Sustainable Harvest Sector and
Tri-State Sector received a FY 2010
exemption from the DAS Leasing
Program length and horsepower
baseline restrictions on DAS leases
between vessels within their individual
sectors as well as with vessels in other
sectors with this exemption. Restricting
sectors to their ACEs eliminates the
need to use vessel characteristics to
control fishing effort. Further,
exemption from this restriction allows
sector vessels greater flexibility in the
utilization of ACE and DAS. Approving
this exemption for additional sectors
could increase the profitability of sector
participants by expanding the pool of
eligible lessors and lessees for any given
vessel. Providing greater flexibility in
the distribution of DAS could result in
increased effort on non-allocated target
stocks, such as monkfish and skates.
However, sectors predicted little
consolidation and redirection of effort
in their FY 2010 operations plans. In
addition, any potential redirection in
effort would be restricted by the sector’s
ACE for each stock, as well as effort
controls in other fisheries (e.g., trip
limits and DAS). For additional
information on this exemption, please
refer to the description of this
exemption in the FY 2010 sector
operations plan rules. This final rule
approves this exemption for 14
additional sectors: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II–XIII; the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector; and the Port Clyde Community
Groundfish Sector.
Supplemental Environmental
Assessment
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act, a
supplemental EA was prepared
analyzing these 17 operations plan
addenda. The supplemental EA is tiered
from the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for Amendment 16 and
the 17 sector EAs prepared for the 17
sector operations plans and contracts
previously approved for FY 2010. The
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80725
supplemental EA for this action
examines the biological, economic, and
social impacts associated with the new
GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption and
expanding the other exemptions
previously approved for some FY 2010
sectors. It also provides a cumulative
effects analysis (CEA) that addresses the
combined impact of the direct and
indirect effects of all proposed
exemptions if approved for all the FY
2010 sectors. For the purpose of this
analysis, the supplemental EA assumes
that all 17 sectors requested and were
granted all additional exemptions,
because any individual sector approved
for a given exemption could fish all the
allocation through ACE trading. The
summary finding of the supplemental
EA concludes that, operating under the
proposed exemptions, the sectors would
produce similar effects that have nonsignificant impacts. An analysis of
aggregate sector impacts was also
conducted. A copy of the supplemental
EA prepared for the 17 sector operations
plan addenda that this rule implements
is available from the Regional Office and
online (see ADDRESSES).
Comments
Comments were submitted by one
individual, one fishing industry
organization, and one environmental
organization. One comment, received
from an individual, was not applicable
to this action, and therefore is not
addressed in this rule.
Comment 1: The Associated Fisheries
of Maine supported the approval of the
addenda to FY 2010 sector operations
plans and all exemption requests
therein.
Response 1: NMFS has approved the
17 addenda and associated exemption
requests, with the exception of the
discarding exemption. The discarding
exemption was removed as an option
from this final rule due to concerns that
implementing this exemption midseason would disrupt sector discard
rates. The discarding exemption will
instead be considered for FY 2011
sectors in the proposed rule that
proposes FY 2011 sector operations
plans and associated exemption
requests.
Comment 2: Oceana opposed the
discarding exemption, asserting that the
prohibition on discarding is clearly
articulated in Amendment 16 and is a
provision of the NE Multispecies FMP
that cannot be changed without a full
amendment to the FMP.
Response 2: Although NMFS is not
approving this exemption request for FY
2010, NMFS disagrees with Oceana’s
assertions about this exemption.
Amendment 16 does not explicitly
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
80726
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
address the handling of unmarketable
fish by sector vessels at sea, as was
determined when NMFS staff raised this
issue with the Council’s Groundfish
Oversight Committee at their June 16,
2010, meeting. At that time, the
Committee requested that NMFS
consider methods to rectify this issue in
the near-term. Thus, NMFS proposed a
partial exemption from the prohibition
on discarding legal-size fish, pursuant to
the regulations at § 648.87(c)(2), which
specify that sectors may request and be
approved for exemptions from any NE
multispecies regulation (with specific
exceptions). This exemption was
proposed in the proposed rule to
implement addenda to FY 2010 sector
operations plans, but removed as an
option in the final rule for the reasons
stated above. This exemption will
instead be considered for FY 2011
sectors in the proposed rule to
implement FY 2011 sector operations
plans. Neither of these actions proposes
to modify the no-discard provision, but
rather proposes sector operations plan
exemptions under the authority
provided to the RA through Amendment
16.
Comment 3: Oceana commented that
the RA may not approve the discarding
exemption for sectors, because the
prohibition on discarding of legal-sized
fish of allocated stocks is part of the
sector reporting requirements, one of the
four provisions from which the RA does
not have authority to grant sectors an
exemption. Oceana stated that approval
of the discarding exemption would
compromise the sector monitoring
program, thus undermining the FMP
goals, and National Standards 2 and 9
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Response 3: Although NMFS is not
approving this exemption request,
NMFS disagrees that the prohibition on
discarding is a sector reporting
requirement. While the purpose of the
no-discard provision is to facilitate the
accurate monitoring of sector ACEs and
is described among sector monitoring
requirements in Amendment 16 and the
NE multispecies regulations, this
provision is not a reporting or
monitoring requirement in itself. This
provision is a possession restriction,
prescribing the handling of legal-sized
fish of allocated stocks, and not the
reporting or monitoring of these fish. It
is NMFS’ intent that the partial
exemption from this possession
restriction, if approved at a later date,
would allow the discarding of
unmarketable fish of allocated stocks
rather than require the retention and
landing of these fish. The discarding
exemption would not exempt sector
vessels from any reporting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
requirements, and all discards would
still be reported consistent with NE
multispecies and sector reporting
requirements.
NMFS disagrees that the discarding
exemption, if later approved, would
compromise the sector monitoring
program. Actual discards by sector
vessels observed by NMFS observers
and at-sea monitors on sector trips are
applied to the sector’s ACEs in live
weights, and incorporated into sectorspecific discard rates that are used to
account for discards by sector vessels on
unobserved trips. If implemented in FY
2011, the discarding exemption would
not modify this monitoring process in
any way. Discards of unmarketable fish
under this exemption would be applied
to sector ACEs through observer data
and sector-specific discard rates, in the
same way that allowable discards are
accounted for currently. Furthermore,
NMFS has delayed consideration of this
exemption for sectors to FY 2011 to
ensure that the exemption does not
disrupt the year-long cumulative dataset
used to monitor sector ACEs. If the
discarding exemption is approved for
FY 2011 sectors, through the final rule
implementing FY 2011 sector operations
plans and contracts, it would be
implemented with the start of the
fishing year on May 1, 2011, so that
unmarketable fish would be consistently
handled and applied to sector ACEs
throughout the 2011 FY. Thus, if later
approved, the discarding exemption
would not compromise the sector ACE
monitoring program implemented by
Amendment 16, nor undermine the
objectives of the FMP or the National
Standards.
Comment 4: Oceana commented that
the proposed rule did not contain
sufficient analysis of the discarding
exemption, including an analysis of its
projected effect on sector discard rates,
and that further analysis should be
completed before any action is taken to
revise this requirement.
Response 4: The analysis of the
discarding exemption in the
supplemental EA and preamble of the
proposed rule was based on the most
reliable information available on
unmarketable fish at the time of the
analysis, which consisted of observer
data from sector trips during the first 3
months of FY 2010. Analysis of the
discarding exemption has been updated
in the final supplemental EA using
observer data from sector trips during
the first half of FY 2010, up to
November 3, 2010, which confirmed
that the occurrence of legal-sized
unmarketable fish limited, and does not
appear to be a significant portion of
sector catch. The analysis of this
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
exemption in the FY 2011 sector
operations plan proposed rule, which
will consider the discarding exemption
for FY 2011 sectors, will also be
updated with available FY 2010
observer data.
As explained previously, NMFS has
delayed consideration of this exemption
for sectors to FY 2011 to ensure that
sector discard rates and the year-long
dataset used to monitor sector ACEs is
not disrupted. If this exemption is
approved for FY 2011 sectors,
unmarketable fish will be applied to
sector ACEs through observer data and
sector-specific discard rates, as
described above, beginning with the
start of FY 2011, May 1, 2011.
Classification
Pursuant to § 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has
determined that this final rule is
consistent with the FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
has determined that this rule is not
subject to the 30-day delayed
effectiveness provision of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
because it relieves a restriction by
granting FY 2010 sector members
exemptions from the following
regulations of the NE Multispecies FMP:
1. Minimum mesh size for sink
gillnets in GOM (GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption);
2. Day gillnet 120-day block
requirement out of the fishery;
3. Prohibition on a vessel hauling
another vessel’s gillnet gear;
4. Limitation on the number of
gillnets that may be hauled on GB when
fishing under a groundfish/monkfish
DAS;
5. Limitation on the number of
gillnets imposed on Day gillnet vessels;
6. 20-day spawning block requirement
out of the fishery required for all
vessels;
7. Limits on the number of hooks that
may be fished; and
8. Length and horsepower restrictions
on DAS leasing.
These regulations from which sector
vessels are exempt remain in place for
vessels in the common pool. Pursuant to
the regulations at §§ 648.87(b)(2)(xv)
and 648.87(c)(2), a sector may request
and be exempt from regulations of the
NE Multispecies FMP, with few
exceptions, through its annual or biannual operations plan. On May 1,
2010, operations plans were
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
implemented for 17 sectors for the 2010
fishing year, including exemptions from
certain NE multispecies regulations. The
final rule implementing FY 2010 sector
operations plans only approved
exemptions for those sectors that had
originally requested them through their
FY 2010 sector operations plans. The
sectors that had not requested certain
exemptions in their operations plans
were required to continue to comply
with the regulations otherwise
exempted for other sectors, which
include effort controls such as required
time out of the fishery and gear
restrictions.
This action expands the previously
approved exemptions for FY 2010 to all
sectors that wish to add them, in
addition to approving a new exemption
for sectors (i.e., the GOM Sink Gillnet
Mesh exemption), via an amendment to
their current operations plan. This rule
relieves several restrictions for the NE
multispecies fishery in order to help
mitigate the adverse economic impacts
resulting from continued efforts to end
overfishing and rebuild overfished
stocks, and increases the flexibility and
economic efficiency of vessel operations
through the approval of exemptions for
vessels participating in NE multispecies
sectors for FY 2010. In general, this rule
implements exemptions from several
effort control measures that are no
longer necessary and, thus, are
redundant for sectors because sectors
are restricted to an ACE for each
groundfish stock, which limits overall
fishing mortality. The exemptions allow
sector members more operational
flexibility, but there is no requirement
to use them on any given fishing trip.
Therefore, a delayed effectiveness is not
required to provide time for sector
members to prepare to use their
requested exemptions.
NE multispecies sector operations,
including exemptions from certain NE
multispecies regulations, are approved
annually. Thus, the exemptions
approved in this rule are only effective
for FY 2010 (through April 30, 2011). To
date, only 5 months remain in FY 2010.
In order to achieve the most economic
benefits, this action must be effective as
soon as possible to maximize the
amount of time sector vessels have to
utilize these exemptions. The GOM sink
gillnet mesh exemption, which is
intended to enhance the ability of sector
vessels to target a rebuilt stock, has a
season associated with it (January 1,
2011, through April 30, 2011). Delayed
implementation of these measures
would shorten the participation period
for this exemption and reduce the
economic benefits sector vessels may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
derive from this and other exemptions
in FY 2010.
Delaying implementation would
result in short-term adverse economic
impacts to NE multispecies vessels and
associated fishing communities since
vessels that are participating in a sector
in FY 2010 (762 permits, 52 percent of
the groundfish fleet) would not be able
to take immediate advantage of the
flexibility in vessel operations this rule
provides. Sector vessels would continue
to operate under redundant effort
controls for an additional month, and
revenues would be expected to be
lower. For example, sector vessels
would not be able to participate in the
GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption that
this rule allows until the last three
months of FY 2010, reducing
opportunity for gillnet vessels to target
haddock and benefit from potentially
increased haddock revenues. Delaying
implementation of these exemptions
could incentivize sector vessels to delay
fishing trips until the period of greater
flexibility, potentially creating safety
issues because sector vessels would
have less flexibility to time fishing trips
to optimal weather conditions.
Furthermore, delaying implementation
would limit flexibility for sector vessels
to time fishing trips to market
conditions, and revenues would be
expected to be lower.
This final rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order (E.O) 12866.
A Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) has been prepared for
this rule as required by § 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
FRFA is comprised of the economic
impacts identified in the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
the preamble of the proposed rule and
this rule, the supplemental EA prepared
for this action, and the discussions,
including responses to public
comments, included in this rule. This
FRFA describes the economic impact
that the proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. A
description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained in the preamble to
this final rule and in sections 1.0, 2.0,
and 3.0 of the supplemental EA
prepared for this action and, thus, are
not repeated here.
No issues were raised by public
comments in response to the IRFA or
with respect to the economic impacts of
this action. Accordingly, no changes
were made from the proposed rule as
the result of any such comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80727
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities To Which the Final
Rule Would Apply
This action would affect regulated
entities engaged in commercial fishing
for groundfish that are enrolled in any
one of the 17 sectors that are operating
in FY 2010. Anyone with a valid limited
access Federal permit under the NE
Multispecies FMP is eligible to join a
sector. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) size standard for
commercial fishing (NAICS code
114111) is $4 million in sales. Available
data indicate that, based on 2005–2007
average conditions, median gross annual
sales by commercial fishing vessels
were just over $200,000, and no single
fishing entity earned more than $2
million annually. Since available data
are not adequate to identify affiliated
vessels, each operating unit is
considered a small entity for purposes
of the RFA.
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Final Rule
This final rule contains no collectionof-information requirement subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Description of Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Economic
Impact on Small Entities Consistent
With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
The EIS for Amendment 16 compares
economic impacts of sector measures
with non-sector measures, and analyzes
costs and benefits of the universal
exemptions. The proposed rule
proposing approval of the FY 2010
sector operations plans and contracts
discussed the economic impacts of the
additional exemptions requested by
sectors. This final rule and the
accompanying supplemental EA discuss
the economic impacts of approving the
GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption, as
well as expanding the exemptions
approved for FY 2010 sectors. The
exemptions implemented by this final
rule would provide additional economic
flexibility to vessels already
participating in NE multispecies sectors
during FY 2010. All exemptions
requested by the sectors are intended to
provide positive social and economic
benefits to sector members and ports.
The GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption is being requested by
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, V–
VIII, and X–XII, the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector, the Sustainable Harvest Sector,
the Port Clyde Community Groundfish
Sector, and the Tri-State Sector, which
represent 616 permits. The exemption
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
80728
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
will allow the use of 6-inch (15.24-cm)
mesh gillnets in the GOM RMA from
January 1, 2011–April 30, 2011. This
exemption would provide participating
sector vessels an opportunity to retain
more GOM haddock, a healthy stock,
and share in the benefits from the stock
recovery. To utilize this exemption, it
would be necessary for participating
sector vessels to purchase 6-inch (15.24cm) mesh gillnets. However, it would
allow a greater catch of haddock, which
may increase revenues for gillnet
fishermen and the ports where they land
their fish, particularly if participating
vessels are able to change fishing
behavior to selectively target this stock
and minimize catch of other allocated
target stocks.
Exemption from the Day gillnet 120day block requirement out of the fishery
is being approved for the Northeast
Fishery Sectors II, V–VIII, X and XII.
Existing regulations require that vessels
using gillnet gear remove all gear from
the water for 120 days per year. Since
the time out from fishing is up to the
vessel owner to decide (with some
restrictions), many affected vessel
owners have purchased more than one
vessel such that one may be used while
the other is taking its 120-day block out
of the groundfish fishery, to provide for
sustained fishing income. Acquiring a
second vessel adds the expense of
outfitting another vessel with gear and
maintaining that vessel. The exemption
from the 120-day block could allow
sector members to realize the cost
savings associated with retiring the
redundant vessel. Furthermore, this
exemption could provide additional
flexibility to sector vessels to maximize
the utility of other sector-specific and
universal exemptions, such as the
exemption from the GB Seasonal
Closure in May and portions of the
GOM Rolling Closure Areas. Several of
the FY 2010 sectors, representing 390
permits, are already utilizing this
exemption. This final rule extends this
flexibility and potential economic
benefits to an additional 226 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III,
and V–XIII, the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector, and the Port Clyde Community
Groundfish Sector, are granted an
exemption from the required 20-day
spawning block out of the fishery.
Exemption from the 20-day spawning
block would improve flexibility to
match trip planning decisions to
existing fishing and market conditions.
Although vessel owners currently have
the flexibility to schedule their 20-day
block according to business needs and
may use that opportunity to perform
routine or scheduled maintenance,
vessel owners may prefer to schedule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
these activities at other times of the
year, or may have unexpected repairs.
Removing this requirement may not
have a significant impact, but could still
provide vessel owners with greater
opportunity to make more efficient use
of their vessel. This exemption was
previously approved for three sectors
representing 153 permits. Approval of
this exemption for these additional
sectors extends the exemption to an
additional 563 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III,
V–VIII, and X–XII, the GB Cod Fixed
Gear Sector, the Port Clyde Community
Groundfish Sector, and the Tri-State
Sector, are granted an exemption from
the limit on the number of nets (not to
exceed 150 in all RMAs) that may be
deployed by Day gillnet vessels. This
exemption would provide greater
flexibility to deploy fishing gear by
participating sector members according
to operational and market needs. In
addition, approval of this exemption
could also maximize the utility of the
GOM Sink Gillnet exemption for those
sectors approved for both because it
would allow them to deploy more nets
under the GOM Sink Gillnet exemption.
A total of 116 permits participating in
FY 2010 sectors are already exempt
from this requirement. This action
extends this flexibility and potential
economic benefits to an additional 500
permits.
The Northeast Fishery Sectors II, V–
VIII, X and XII, the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector, the Sustainable Harvest Sector,
the Port Clyde Community Groundfish
Sector, and the Tri-State Sector are
being granted an exemption from the
prohibition on a vessel hauling gear that
was set by another vessel. The
community fixed gear exemption allows
sector vessels in the Day gillnet category
to effectively pool gillnet gear that may
be hauled or set by sector members.
This provision could reduce the total
amount of gear that would have to be
purchased and maintained by
participating sector members resulting
in some uncertain level of cost savings,
along with a possible reduction in total
gear fished. This exemption has already
been approved for 120 permits in FY
2010 sectors and is being approved for
additional sectors through this action,
representing an additional 496 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III,
V–VIII, and X–XII, the Sustainable
Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector, and the
Tri-State Sector are granted an
exemption from the limitation on the
number of gillnets that may be hauled
on GB when fishing under a groundfish/
monkfish DAS. Approving this
exemption would increase operational
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
flexibility for an additional 522 permits,
providing an opportunity for a
substantial portion of the fleet to
improve vessel profitability.
The Northeast Fishery Sectors II and
III, V–VIII, and X–XII, the Sustainable
Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector, the TriState Sector, and the Northeast Coastal
Communities Sector, representing an
additional 540 permits, are granted an
exemption from the number of hooks
that may be fished. These exemptions
would provide vessel owners in these
additional sectors with the flexibility to
adapt the number of hooks fished to
existing fishing and market conditions
and, thereby, improve vessel
profitability. The exemption from the
number of hooks that may be fished has
been granted to the GB Cod Hook Sector
each year since 2004 and was granted to
the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector for FY
2010. Approval of this exemption for
these additional sectors extends the
potential economic benefits to more
vessels in other sectors.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II–XIII, the
GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector, and the Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector,
are granted an exemption from
regulations that currently limit leasing
of DAS to vessels within specified
length and horsepower restrictions.
Current restrictions create a system in
which a small vessel may lease DAS
from virtually any other vessel, but is
limited in the number of vessels that it
may lease to. The opposite is true for
larger vessels. Exemption from these
restrictions allows greater flexibility to
lease DAS between vessels of different
sizes and could expand the market of
potential lessees for some vessels. The
efficiency gains of this exemption as
approved for the Tri-State Sector and
the Sustainable Harvest Sector were
limited because the exemption would
only apply to leases between Tri-State
Sector and Sustainable Harvest Sector
members, representing 135 permits.
This action extends this exemption to
an additional 609 permits, which could
not only potentially increase efficiency
for the additional sectors for which this
exemption is approved, but also for
members of the Tri-State and
Sustainable Harvest Sectors by
expanding the pool of potential lessees
with this exemption. Since DAS are not
required while fishing for groundfish,
the economic importance of this
exemption would be associated with the
need to use NE multispecies DAS when
fishing in other fisheries, for example,
monkfish.
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Economic Impacts of the Alternative to
the Proposed Action
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Under the No Action alternative, one
or more of the sectors’ requests for
operations plan addenda would be
disapproved, which would result in
sector vessels operating under the
operations plans and exemptions as
approved for the start of the 2010 FY in
the sector operations plan final rule
published April 9, 2010. Under this
scenario, sector vessels may experience
the efficiency gains and economic
benefits of sector participation and the
exemptions for which they have already
been approved, as described in the IRFA
for the proposed rule proposing
approval of FY 2010 sector operations
and exemptions. However, sector
vessels would not be provided the
opportunity to benefit from the increase
in the operational flexibility that may be
gained from all the exemptions available
to FY 2010 sectors and revenues would
be expected to be lower than under the
proposed action. Relative to the
proposed action, it is more likely under
the No Action alternative that the ports
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
and fishing communities where sectors
plan to land their fish would be
negatively impacted.
Allowing sectors to propose either
entirely new exemptions or variations of
previously approved exemptions was
considered. However, this alternative
was considered unreasonable because
these exemptions are discrete measures
which, by their nature, do not lend
themselves to alternate configurations,
and allowing sectors to propose entirely
new exemptions or changing already
approved exemptions could result in
implementation delays that would
reduce the utility of this action for
sectors in this fishing year (FY 2010). In
addition, this action is intended to be a
continuing part of a longer action
implementing Amendment 16,
Framework Adjustment 44 to the NE
Multispecies FMP, and the final rule
approving FY 2010 sector operations
plans, in which other alternative
measures have already been considered.
The FY 2010 sectors will have an
opportunity to propose any new or
revised exemptions in their operations
plans for FY 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
80729
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1966 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity compliance
guides.’’ The agency shall explain the
actions a small entity is required to take
to comply with a rule or group of rules.
As part of this rulemaking process, a
letter to sector members that also serves
as a small entity compliance guide (the
guide) was prepared. Copies of this final
rule are available from the Regional
Administrator. The guide and this final
rule will be available upon request.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–32340 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80720-80729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32340]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 100818375-0600-02]
RIN 0648-XX84
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern
United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Final Rule to Implement
Addenda to 17 Fishing Year (FY) 2010 Sector Operations Plans and
Contracts
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements addenda to add exemptions from
certain Federal fishing regulations to some or all Northeast (NE)
multispecies sector operations plans that were previously approved by
the final sector rule published April 9, 2010. That rule approved FY
2010 sector operations plans and contracts for, and made allocations of
Annual Catch Entitlements (ACE) to, 17 sectors in the NE multispecies
fishery. In addition, this action approves an exemption functionally
equivalent to the Gulf of Maine (GOM) Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot
Program for FY 2010 sectors (proposed in Amendment 16 to the NE
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for both common pool and
sector vessels, but disapproved by NMFS), since this program would be
more controlled for sectors and unlikely to compromise efforts to
eliminate overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks. The exemptions are
intended to provide additional flexibility and improve profitability
for sector vessels.
DATES: Effective December 23, 2010, through April 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of addenda to the FY 2010 sector operations plans and
contracts, and the supplemental environmental assessment (EA), are
available from the NMFS NE Regional Office: Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. These documents are also
accessible via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. A Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) was
prepared for this final rule and is comprised of the EA, the preamble,
and the Classification sections of the final rule.
[[Page 80721]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Vasquez, Fishery Policy
Analyst, phone (978) 281-9166, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposed rule (75 FR 53939) to implement
addenda to the 17 approved FY 2010 NE multispecies sector operations
plans was published in the Federal Register on September 2, 2010,
soliciting public comment through September 17, 2010. A second rule (75
FR 59204; September 27, 2010) reopened and extended the comment period
to October 1, 2010, to provide additional opportunity for public
comment on the proposed addenda. After review of all public comments,
NMFS has partially approved the 17 sector operations plan addenda, with
the exception of one exemption requested by several sectors,
determining that the addenda are consistent with the goals of the FMP
as described in Amendment 16, and other applicable laws, and are in
compliance with the regulations that govern NE multispecies sector
allocation management as specified in 50 CFR 648.87.
Background
A final rule, published April 9, 2010 (75 FR 18113), approved FY
2010 sector operations plans and contracts for, and made allocations of
ACE to, 17 NE multispecies sectors. The Amendment 16 regulations
governing the sector operations plans and contracts allow for a sector
to request exemptions from Federal fishing regulations through the
sector operations plan and contract submitted to NMFS for approval on
an annual or bi-annual basis (Sec. 648.87(b)(2)(xv)). Pursuant to
Sec. 648.87(c)(2), the Regional Administrator may exempt vessels
participating in a sector from certain Federal fishing regulations, in
addition to the Amendment 16 universal exemptions already approved for
all sectors. Regulations prohibit sectors from requesting exemptions
that involve: NE multispecies year-round closure areas, permitting
restrictions (e.g., vessel upgrades, etc.); gear restrictions designed
to minimize habitat impacts (e.g., roller gear restrictions, etc.); and
reporting requirements (not including days-at-sea (DAS) reporting
requirements or Special Access Program (SAP)-specific reporting
requirements). For FY 2010, the final rule implementing sectors
approved several new exemptions from NE multispecies regulations for
those sectors that requested the exemptions through their FY 2010
sector operations plans. Specifically, certain sectors received
exemptions from the following measures: (1) 120-day block out of the
fishery required for Day gillnet vessels; (2) 20-day spawning block out
of the fishery required for all vessels; (3) limitation on the number
of gillnets imposed on Day gillnet vessels; (4) prohibition on a vessel
hauling another vessel's gillnet gear; (5) limitation on the number of
gillnets that may be hauled on Georges Bank (GB) when fishing under a
groundfish/monkfish DAS; (6) limits on the number of hooks that may be
fished; and (7) DAS Leasing Program length and horsepower restrictions.
The sectors also requested several exemptions in the FY 2010
operations plans that NMFS subsequently disapproved, because they are
prohibited from being requested or because similar exemption requests
were being addressed in the Amendment 16 proposed rule. Among these was
a request by the Sustainable Harvest Sector to participate in the GOM
Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot Program, a program proposed in Amendment 16
that would have allowed the seasonal use of 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh
gillnets in the GOM Regulated Mesh Area (RMA) (as opposed to the
current 6.5-inch (16.51-cm) mesh requirement) for the purposes of
targeting GOM haddock.
Upon initial review of the FY 2010 sector operations plans and
contracts, NMFS requested that sectors remove exemption requests that
repeated measures already proposed under Amendment 16, including the
GOM Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot Program, to avoid duplication in the
rulemaking process. The Pilot Program was subsequently disapproved for
all groundfish vessels by NMFS in Amendment 16 because of concern that
it could increase catch of overfished stocks, such as GOM cod, and
therefore undermine the rebuilding programs for these stocks.
In comments on the proposed FY 2010 sector operations plan rule,
the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the New England Fishery Management
Council (Council), and 14 others asked what actions NMFS was
considering for exemption requests such as the pilot program that were
removed from sector operations plans to reduce duplication with
Amendment 16, but which were subsequently disapproved in Amendment 16.
NMFS responded in a March 23, 2010, letter to the Council that it would
work with sector managers regarding reconsideration of the pilot
program for sectors in a separate rulemaking given that, for a sector,
this program would be more controlled and unlikely to compromise
efforts to eliminate overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks. At that
time, NMFS noted it would also consider granting approved sector
exemption requests to all FY 2010 sectors, if appropriate, through
additional rulemaking. As a result, in April 2010, NMFS solicited
requests from the approved FY 2010 sectors to determine if they would
be interested in an exemption that would be functionally equivalent to
the GOM Haddock Sink Gillnet Pilot Program (i.e., the ``GOM sink
gillnet mesh exemption''), as well as any additional exemptions
approved in the final sector rule which their sector had not previously
requested. In response, all 17 sectors submitted requests for addenda
to their operations plans and contracts to incorporate additional
exemptions. Therefore, 17 addenda to the approved FY 2010 sector
operations plans and contracts, and the additional exemptions requested
therein, were proposed in the proposed rule published September 2,
2010.
Among the exemptions under consideration in the proposed rule was a
partial exemption from the requirement to retain and land all legal-
sized fish of the 14 stocks allocated to sectors. Regulations at
Sec. Sec. 648.14(k)(14)(viii) and 648.87 (b)(1)(v)(A) specifically
prohibit sector vessels from discarding legal-sized regulated species
allocated to sectors. This requirement applies to all fish or pieces of
fish above the minimum size, including fish that may be considered
unmarketable, such as depredated fish. Sector members and managers
raised concerns with this requirement, specifically the retention of
unmarketable fish, stating that the need to separate the unmarketable
fish from the food-grade product within limited deck and storage space
was creating operational difficulties and potential safety hazards at
sea. Although this problem was raised to the Council during the
development of Amendment 16, no exceptions to this requirement were
considered or recommended by the Council.
To address this concern, the proposed rule to implement sector
operations plan addenda proposed a partial exemption in each sector
operations plan from the prohibition on discarding of legal-sized
unmarketable fish of allocated stocks, provided that the legal-sized
unmarketable fish are accounted for in the sector's discard rate, as
determined through observer coverage, similar to how other allowable
discards are accounted for. For the purposes of this exemption,
unmarketable fish is defined as any legal-sized fish the vessel
[[Page 80722]]
owner/captain elects not to retain because of condition or
marketability problems.
Since proposing this measure in the proposed rule, new concerns
have come to light regarding implementation of this measure mid-year,
rather than at the start of the fishing year, given that it would
require the adjustment of sector discard rates mid-season. NMFS had
intended to revise the sector-specific discard rates for sectors that
opt for the discarding exemption, to adjust for the change in
possession restrictions and the handling of legal-sized unmarketable
fish. However, it was determined that adjusting sector discard rates
mid-season would disrupt the cumulative year-long dataset used to
monitor sector ACEs. In addition, implementing this exemption mid-
season would disrupt some sector's discard rates more than others,
potentially raising equity issues. Therefore, because granting this
exemption without accounting for revised discard rates would not
adequately track catch of multispecies stocks, this exemption has been
removed as an option in this final rule. NMFS will instead consider
this exemption for FY 2011 sector operations plans, which would be
effective at the start of the new fishing year (May 1, 2011) and, thus,
would be less disruptive to sector discard rates.
Approved Sector Exemption Requests
After thorough review and consideration of public comments on the
exemption requests, NMFS authorizes exemptions from the following
regulations for all individual sectors that requested them: (1) Minimum
mesh size for sink gillnets in the GOM (GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption); (2) 120-day block out of the fishery required for Day
gillnet vessels; (3) 20-day spawning block out of the fishery required
for all vessels; (4) limitation on the number of gillnets imposed on
Day gillnet vessels; (5) prohibition on a vessel hauling another
vessel's gillnet gear; (6) limitation on the number of gillnets that
may be hauled on GB when fishing under a groundfish/monkfish DAS; (7)
limits on the number of hooks that may be fished; and (8) DAS Leasing
Program length and horsepower restrictions. A summary of exemptions
authorized for individual sectors is available in Table 1, and further
details of each exemption are discussed below.
The supplemental EA prepared for this action analyzed the impacts
of expanding these exemptions to all FY 2010 sectors, not just those
sectors that requested them. Therefore, although the addenda
implemented through this final rule add only those exemptions currently
requested by each sector, NMFS authorizes these exemptions for all FY
2010 sectors such that a sector may submit a request for an addendum to
their FY 2010 sector operations plan to add any of these approved
exemptions at a later date, and NMFS may review and could approve the
request without additional rulemaking. Approved addenda would be made
available on the Northeast Regional Office Web site, or by mail upon
request [see ADDRESSES].
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[[Page 80723]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23DE10.003
BILLING CODE 3510-22-C
1. GOM Sink Gillnet Mesh Exemption
Regulations require a minimum mesh size of 6.5-inch (16.51-cm) for
gillnets in the GOM RMA (Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(iv)). Minimum mesh size
requirements have been used, along with other management measures, to
reduce overall mortality on groundfish stocks, as well as to reduce
discarding and improve survival of sub-legal groundfish. This exemption
allows FY 2010 sector vessels to use 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh stand-up
gillnets in the GOM RMA from January 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011, to fish
for haddock. Sector vessels utilizing this exemption are prohibited
from using tie-down gillnets in the GOM RMA during this period. Sector
vessels may transit the GOM RMA with tie-down gillnets, provided they
are properly stowed and not available for immediate use in accordance
with one of the methods specified at Sec. 648.23(b). In the proposed
rule, NMFS proposed that Day gillnet vessels would not be able to fish
with, possess, haul, or deploy more than 30 nets per trip during this
period. However, Day gillnet vessels participating in sectors granted
the exemption from Day gillnet net limits are exempt from the general
net limit in the GOM RMA, and would be able to fish up to 150 nets in
the GOM RMA at other times of year. Therefore, to maximize the
flexibility for sector vessels fishing under this exemption, NMFS is
allowing Day gillnet vessels participating in a sector granted both the
GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption and the general net limit exemption to
fish up to 150 stand-up nets in the GOM RMA during this period (up to
150 nets total in all RMAs). Day gillnet vessels participating in a
sector that has not also been approved for the general net limit
exemption will be restricted to the limit of 50 stand-up sink gillnets
during this period, consistent with existing net limits in the GOM RMA
specified at Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(iv)(B)(2). The Letter of Authorization
(LOA) issued to the sector vessels that qualify for this exemption will
specify the net restrictions to help ensure the provision is
enforceable. There is no limit on the number of nets that participating
Trip gillnet vessels are able to fish with, possess, haul, or deploy,
during this period, because Trip gillnet vessels are required to remove
all gillnet gear from the water before returning to port at the end of
a fishing trip.
Recent selectivity studies have indicated that 6.5-inch (16.51-cm)
sink gillnets may not be effective at retaining haddock at the current
legal minimum fish size. This exemption would provide sector vessels
the opportunity to utilize a smaller mesh size gillnet to potentially
catch more haddock in the GOM, and, thereby, increase efficiency and
revenue in the fishery. NMFS believes that impacts to allocated target
stocks resulting from this exemption would be negligible, because
fishing mortality by sector vessels is restricted by an ACE for
[[Page 80724]]
allocated stocks, which caps overall mortality. It is possible that a
higher net limit for Day gillnet vessels participating in this program
could result in an increase in the number of gillnets in the water at
one time and, therefore, potentially increase interactions with
protected species. However, potential negative impacts to protected
species from this exemption are expected to be low because additional
nets may result in greater efficiency that could decrease the overall
number of soak hours throughout the year as a sector's ACE is caught
faster, thus potentially reducing interactions with protected species.
In addition, sector vessels utilizing this exemption are still required
to comply with all requirements of the Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction
Plan (75 FR 12698; March 17, 2010) and Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan (73 FR 58942; October 8, 2008). The GOM sink gillnet
mesh exemption is approved for Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, V-
VIII, and X-XII, the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector, the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector and the Tri-
State Sector.
2. 120-Day Block Requirement Out of the Fishery for Day Gillnet Vessels
The 120-day block requirement out of the fishery for Day gillnet
vessels was implemented to help ensure that management measures for Day
gillnet vessels were comparable to effort controls placed on other
fishing gear types, given that gillnets continue to fish as long as
they are in the water. Regulations at Sec. 648.82(j)(1)(ii) require
that each NE multispecies gillnet vessel declared into the Day gillnet
category declare out and be out of the non-exempt gillnet fishery for
120 days each fishing year. Each period of time taken must be a minimum
of 7 consecutive days, and at least 21 of the 120 days must be taken
between June 1 and September 30. This exemption was previously approved
for the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector, Sustainable Harvest Sector, Port
Clyde Community Groundfish Sector, Tri-State Sector, and Northeast
Fishery Sectors III and XI, based upon the rationale that this measure
was designed to control fishing effort and, therefore, is no longer
necessary for sectors because sectors are restricted to an ACE for each
groundfish stock, which limits overall fishing mortality resulting from
sector operations. Approval of this exemption for additional sectors
would increase the operational flexibility of sector vessels and is
expected to increase profit margins of sector fishermen. For additional
information on this exemption, please refer to the description of this
exemption in the proposed and final rules approving FY 2010 sector
operations plans (74 FR 68015 and 75 FR 18113, respectively). This
exemption is approved for seven additional sectors: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II, V-VIII, X, and XII.
3. 20-Day Spawning Block
Regulations at Sec. 648.82(g) require vessels to declare out and
be out of the NE multispecies DAS program for a 20-day period each
calendar year between March 1 and May 31, when spawning is most
prevalent in the GOM. This regulation was developed to reduce fishing
effort on spawning groundfish stocks and an exemption from this
requirement was previously approved for FY 2010 sectors based upon the
rationale that the sector's ACE will restrict fishing mortality, making
the requirement no longer necessary as an effort control. Exemption
from this requirement is being approved for additional sectors, because
it would provide vessel owners with greater flexibility to plan
operations according to fishing and market conditions. For additional
information on this exemption, please refer to the description of this
exemption in the FY 2010 sector operations plan rules. This exemption
was previously approved for the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Tri-
State Sector, and the Northeast Coastal Communities Sector. This final
rule approves this exemption for an additional 13 sectors: Northeast
Fishery Sectors II, III, and V-XIII; the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector; and
the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector.
4. Limitation on the Number of Gillnets for Day Gillnet Vessels
Current gear restrictions in the groundfish RMAs restrict Day
gillnet vessels from fishing more than: 100 gillnets (of which no more
than 50 can be roundfish gillnets) in the GOM RMA (Sec.
648.80(a)(3)(iv)(B)(2)); 50 gillnets in the GB RMA (Sec.
648.80(a)(4)(iv)(B)(1); and 75 gillnets in the Southern New England
(SNE) and Mid-Atlantic (MA) RMAs (Sec. Sec. 648.80(b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) and
648.80(c)(2)(v)(B)(1), respectively). This exemption, as previously
approved for the Sustainable Harvest Sector in the final sector rule
for FY 2010, allows sector vessels to fish up to 150 nets (any
combination of flatfish or roundfish nets) in each of the RMAs (up to
150 total), and would provide greater operational flexibility to sector
vessels in deploying gillnet gear. This exemption was originally
approved, and is being approved for additional sectors, based upon the
rationale that it is designed to control fishing effort and is no
longer necessary for sector vessels, since each sector is restricted by
an ACE for each stock, which caps overall fishing mortality. For
additional information on this exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY 2010 sector operations plan
rules. This final rule approves this exemption for 12 additional
sectors: Northeast Fishery Sectors II, III, V-VIII, and X-XII; the GB
Cod Fixed Gear Sector; the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector; and
the Tri-State Sector.
5. Prohibition on a Vessel Hauling Another Vessel's Gillnet Gear
Northeast Fishery Sectors III and XI received an exemption for FY
2010 from current regulations that prohibit one vessel from hauling
another vessel's gillnet gear (Sec. Sec. 648.14(k)(6)(ii)(A) and
648.84(a)) in order to share fixed gear among sector vessels. This
exemption was originally approved for FY 2010 sectors and is being
expanded to allow sector vessels to reduce costs by pooling gillnet
gear, and because it was determined that the regulations pertaining to
hauling and setting responsibilities are no longer necessary when
sectors are confined to an ACE for each stock. Consistent with the
exemption as originally approved, the sectors that requested this
exemption proposed that all vessels utilizing community fixed gear be
jointly liable for any violations associated with that gear. For
additional information on this exemption, please refer to the
description of this exemption in the FY 2010 sector operations plan
rules. Note that the description of this exemption in the FY 2010
sector operations plan rules and the proposed rule to implement FY 2010
sector operations plan addenda incorrectly referred to the entirety of
Sec. 648.84. This exemption was intended to exempt sector vessels only
partially from Sec. 648.84(a), to allow a sector vessel to haul
gillnet gear marked by another vessel participating in this exemption.
The regulation citation has been corrected in this final rule and will
be reflected in the LOA issued to each sector vessel. This exemption is
approved for an 11 additional sectors: Northeast Fishery Sectors II, V-
VIII, X, and XII; the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector; the Sustainable Harvest
Sector; the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector; and the Tri-State
Sector.
[[Page 80725]]
6. Limitation on the Number of Gillnets That May Be Hauled on GB When
Fishing Under a Groundfish/Monkfish DAS
The GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector received an exemption for FY 2010 from
the limit on the number of gillnets that may be hauled on GB when
fishing under a groundfish/monkfish DAS. Current regulations at Sec.
648.80(a)(4)(iv) prohibit Day gillnet vessels fishing on a groundfish
DAS from possessing, deploying, fishing, or hauling more than 50 nets
on GB, and were implemented as a groundfish mortality control under
Amendment 13. This exemption was previously approved, and is being
expanded to additional sectors, because it would allow nets deployed
under existing net limits of the Monkfish FMP to be hauled more
efficiently by vessels dually permitted under both FMPs. For additional
information on this exemption, please refer to the description of this
exemption in the FY 2010 sector operations plan rules. This exemption
is approved for an additional 12 sectors for FY 2010: Northeast Fishery
Sectors II, III, V-VIII, and X-XII; the Sustainable Harvest Sector; the
Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector; and the Tri-State Sector.
7. Limitation on the Number of Hooks That May Be Fished
The GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector was granted an exemption for FY 2010
from the number of hooks that a vessel may fish on a given fishing
trip. Current regulations at Sec. 648.80 prohibit vessels from fishing
or possessing more than 2,000 rigged hooks in the GOM RMA, more than
3,600 rigged hooks in the GB RMA, more than 2,000 rigged hooks in the
Southern New England (SNE) RMA, or 4,500 rigged hooks in the MA RMA.
This exemption was approved in the final rule approving sector
operations plans for FY 2010 and is being approved here for additional
sectors because it would allow sector vessels to more efficiently
harvest ACE and is no longer a necessary control on effort by sector
vessels. For additional information on this exemption, please refer to
the description of this exemption in the FY 2010 sector operations plan
rules. This action exempts 13 additional sectors from this requirement:
Northeast Fishery Sectors II, III, V-VIII, and X-XII; the Sustainable
Harvest Sector; the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector; the Tri-
State Sector; and the Northeast Coastal Communities Sector.
8. Length and Horsepower Restrictions on DAS Leasing
While sector vessels are exempt from the requirement to use NE
multispecies DAS to harvest groundfish, sector vessels have been
allocated and still need to use NE multispecies DAS for specific
circumstances. For example, the Monkfish FMP includes a requirement
that limited access monkfish Category C and D vessels harvesting more
than the incidental monkfish catch must fish under both a monkfish and
a NE multispecies DAS. Therefore, sector vessels may still use, and
lease, NE multispecies DAS.
The Sustainable Harvest Sector and Tri-State Sector received a FY
2010 exemption from the DAS Leasing Program length and horsepower
baseline restrictions on DAS leases between vessels within their
individual sectors as well as with vessels in other sectors with this
exemption. Restricting sectors to their ACEs eliminates the need to use
vessel characteristics to control fishing effort. Further, exemption
from this restriction allows sector vessels greater flexibility in the
utilization of ACE and DAS. Approving this exemption for additional
sectors could increase the profitability of sector participants by
expanding the pool of eligible lessors and lessees for any given
vessel. Providing greater flexibility in the distribution of DAS could
result in increased effort on non-allocated target stocks, such as
monkfish and skates. However, sectors predicted little consolidation
and redirection of effort in their FY 2010 operations plans. In
addition, any potential redirection in effort would be restricted by
the sector's ACE for each stock, as well as effort controls in other
fisheries (e.g., trip limits and DAS). For additional information on
this exemption, please refer to the description of this exemption in
the FY 2010 sector operations plan rules. This final rule approves this
exemption for 14 additional sectors: Northeast Fishery Sectors II-XIII;
the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector; and the Port Clyde Community Groundfish
Sector.
Supplemental Environmental Assessment
In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, a
supplemental EA was prepared analyzing these 17 operations plan
addenda. The supplemental EA is tiered from the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for Amendment 16 and the 17 sector EAs prepared for the
17 sector operations plans and contracts previously approved for FY
2010. The supplemental EA for this action examines the biological,
economic, and social impacts associated with the new GOM sink gillnet
mesh exemption and expanding the other exemptions previously approved
for some FY 2010 sectors. It also provides a cumulative effects
analysis (CEA) that addresses the combined impact of the direct and
indirect effects of all proposed exemptions if approved for all the FY
2010 sectors. For the purpose of this analysis, the supplemental EA
assumes that all 17 sectors requested and were granted all additional
exemptions, because any individual sector approved for a given
exemption could fish all the allocation through ACE trading. The
summary finding of the supplemental EA concludes that, operating under
the proposed exemptions, the sectors would produce similar effects that
have non-significant impacts. An analysis of aggregate sector impacts
was also conducted. A copy of the supplemental EA prepared for the 17
sector operations plan addenda that this rule implements is available
from the Regional Office and online (see ADDRESSES).
Comments
Comments were submitted by one individual, one fishing industry
organization, and one environmental organization. One comment, received
from an individual, was not applicable to this action, and therefore is
not addressed in this rule.
Comment 1: The Associated Fisheries of Maine supported the approval
of the addenda to FY 2010 sector operations plans and all exemption
requests therein.
Response 1: NMFS has approved the 17 addenda and associated
exemption requests, with the exception of the discarding exemption. The
discarding exemption was removed as an option from this final rule due
to concerns that implementing this exemption mid-season would disrupt
sector discard rates. The discarding exemption will instead be
considered for FY 2011 sectors in the proposed rule that proposes FY
2011 sector operations plans and associated exemption requests.
Comment 2: Oceana opposed the discarding exemption, asserting that
the prohibition on discarding is clearly articulated in Amendment 16
and is a provision of the NE Multispecies FMP that cannot be changed
without a full amendment to the FMP.
Response 2: Although NMFS is not approving this exemption request
for FY 2010, NMFS disagrees with Oceana's assertions about this
exemption. Amendment 16 does not explicitly
[[Page 80726]]
address the handling of unmarketable fish by sector vessels at sea, as
was determined when NMFS staff raised this issue with the Council's
Groundfish Oversight Committee at their June 16, 2010, meeting. At that
time, the Committee requested that NMFS consider methods to rectify
this issue in the near-term. Thus, NMFS proposed a partial exemption
from the prohibition on discarding legal-size fish, pursuant to the
regulations at Sec. 648.87(c)(2), which specify that sectors may
request and be approved for exemptions from any NE multispecies
regulation (with specific exceptions). This exemption was proposed in
the proposed rule to implement addenda to FY 2010 sector operations
plans, but removed as an option in the final rule for the reasons
stated above. This exemption will instead be considered for FY 2011
sectors in the proposed rule to implement FY 2011 sector operations
plans. Neither of these actions proposes to modify the no-discard
provision, but rather proposes sector operations plan exemptions under
the authority provided to the RA through Amendment 16.
Comment 3: Oceana commented that the RA may not approve the
discarding exemption for sectors, because the prohibition on discarding
of legal-sized fish of allocated stocks is part of the sector reporting
requirements, one of the four provisions from which the RA does not
have authority to grant sectors an exemption. Oceana stated that
approval of the discarding exemption would compromise the sector
monitoring program, thus undermining the FMP goals, and National
Standards 2 and 9 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Response 3: Although NMFS is not approving this exemption request,
NMFS disagrees that the prohibition on discarding is a sector reporting
requirement. While the purpose of the no-discard provision is to
facilitate the accurate monitoring of sector ACEs and is described
among sector monitoring requirements in Amendment 16 and the NE
multispecies regulations, this provision is not a reporting or
monitoring requirement in itself. This provision is a possession
restriction, prescribing the handling of legal-sized fish of allocated
stocks, and not the reporting or monitoring of these fish. It is NMFS'
intent that the partial exemption from this possession restriction, if
approved at a later date, would allow the discarding of unmarketable
fish of allocated stocks rather than require the retention and landing
of these fish. The discarding exemption would not exempt sector vessels
from any reporting requirements, and all discards would still be
reported consistent with NE multispecies and sector reporting
requirements.
NMFS disagrees that the discarding exemption, if later approved,
would compromise the sector monitoring program. Actual discards by
sector vessels observed by NMFS observers and at-sea monitors on sector
trips are applied to the sector's ACEs in live weights, and
incorporated into sector-specific discard rates that are used to
account for discards by sector vessels on unobserved trips. If
implemented in FY 2011, the discarding exemption would not modify this
monitoring process in any way. Discards of unmarketable fish under this
exemption would be applied to sector ACEs through observer data and
sector-specific discard rates, in the same way that allowable discards
are accounted for currently. Furthermore, NMFS has delayed
consideration of this exemption for sectors to FY 2011 to ensure that
the exemption does not disrupt the year-long cumulative dataset used to
monitor sector ACEs. If the discarding exemption is approved for FY
2011 sectors, through the final rule implementing FY 2011 sector
operations plans and contracts, it would be implemented with the start
of the fishing year on May 1, 2011, so that unmarketable fish would be
consistently handled and applied to sector ACEs throughout the 2011 FY.
Thus, if later approved, the discarding exemption would not compromise
the sector ACE monitoring program implemented by Amendment 16, nor
undermine the objectives of the FMP or the National Standards.
Comment 4: Oceana commented that the proposed rule did not contain
sufficient analysis of the discarding exemption, including an analysis
of its projected effect on sector discard rates, and that further
analysis should be completed before any action is taken to revise this
requirement.
Response 4: The analysis of the discarding exemption in the
supplemental EA and preamble of the proposed rule was based on the most
reliable information available on unmarketable fish at the time of the
analysis, which consisted of observer data from sector trips during the
first 3 months of FY 2010. Analysis of the discarding exemption has
been updated in the final supplemental EA using observer data from
sector trips during the first half of FY 2010, up to November 3, 2010,
which confirmed that the occurrence of legal-sized unmarketable fish
limited, and does not appear to be a significant portion of sector
catch. The analysis of this exemption in the FY 2011 sector operations
plan proposed rule, which will consider the discarding exemption for FY
2011 sectors, will also be updated with available FY 2010 observer
data.
As explained previously, NMFS has delayed consideration of this
exemption for sectors to FY 2011 to ensure that sector discard rates
and the year-long dataset used to monitor sector ACEs is not disrupted.
If this exemption is approved for FY 2011 sectors, unmarketable fish
will be applied to sector ACEs through observer data and sector-
specific discard rates, as described above, beginning with the start of
FY 2011, May 1, 2011.
Classification
Pursuant to Sec. 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that this final rule
is consistent with the FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries has determined that this rule is not subject to the 30-day
delayed effectiveness provision of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) because it relieves a restriction by granting FY 2010 sector
members exemptions from the following regulations of the NE
Multispecies FMP:
1. Minimum mesh size for sink gillnets in GOM (GOM sink gillnet
mesh exemption);
2. Day gillnet 120-day block requirement out of the fishery;
3. Prohibition on a vessel hauling another vessel's gillnet gear;
4. Limitation on the number of gillnets that may be hauled on GB
when fishing under a groundfish/monkfish DAS;
5. Limitation on the number of gillnets imposed on Day gillnet
vessels;
6. 20-day spawning block requirement out of the fishery required
for all vessels;
7. Limits on the number of hooks that may be fished; and
8. Length and horsepower restrictions on DAS leasing.
These regulations from which sector vessels are exempt remain in
place for vessels in the common pool. Pursuant to the regulations at
Sec. Sec. 648.87(b)(2)(xv) and 648.87(c)(2), a sector may request and
be exempt from regulations of the NE Multispecies FMP, with few
exceptions, through its annual or bi-annual operations plan. On May 1,
2010, operations plans were
[[Page 80727]]
implemented for 17 sectors for the 2010 fishing year, including
exemptions from certain NE multispecies regulations. The final rule
implementing FY 2010 sector operations plans only approved exemptions
for those sectors that had originally requested them through their FY
2010 sector operations plans. The sectors that had not requested
certain exemptions in their operations plans were required to continue
to comply with the regulations otherwise exempted for other sectors,
which include effort controls such as required time out of the fishery
and gear restrictions.
This action expands the previously approved exemptions for FY 2010
to all sectors that wish to add them, in addition to approving a new
exemption for sectors (i.e., the GOM Sink Gillnet Mesh exemption), via
an amendment to their current operations plan. This rule relieves
several restrictions for the NE multispecies fishery in order to help
mitigate the adverse economic impacts resulting from continued efforts
to end overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks, and increases the
flexibility and economic efficiency of vessel operations through the
approval of exemptions for vessels participating in NE multispecies
sectors for FY 2010. In general, this rule implements exemptions from
several effort control measures that are no longer necessary and, thus,
are redundant for sectors because sectors are restricted to an ACE for
each groundfish stock, which limits overall fishing mortality. The
exemptions allow sector members more operational flexibility, but there
is no requirement to use them on any given fishing trip. Therefore, a
delayed effectiveness is not required to provide time for sector
members to prepare to use their requested exemptions.
NE multispecies sector operations, including exemptions from
certain NE multispecies regulations, are approved annually. Thus, the
exemptions approved in this rule are only effective for FY 2010
(through April 30, 2011). To date, only 5 months remain in FY 2010. In
order to achieve the most economic benefits, this action must be
effective as soon as possible to maximize the amount of time sector
vessels have to utilize these exemptions. The GOM sink gillnet mesh
exemption, which is intended to enhance the ability of sector vessels
to target a rebuilt stock, has a season associated with it (January 1,
2011, through April 30, 2011). Delayed implementation of these measures
would shorten the participation period for this exemption and reduce
the economic benefits sector vessels may derive from this and other
exemptions in FY 2010.
Delaying implementation would result in short-term adverse economic
impacts to NE multispecies vessels and associated fishing communities
since vessels that are participating in a sector in FY 2010 (762
permits, 52 percent of the groundfish fleet) would not be able to take
immediate advantage of the flexibility in vessel operations this rule
provides. Sector vessels would continue to operate under redundant
effort controls for an additional month, and revenues would be expected
to be lower. For example, sector vessels would not be able to
participate in the GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption that this rule
allows until the last three months of FY 2010, reducing opportunity for
gillnet vessels to target haddock and benefit from potentially
increased haddock revenues. Delaying implementation of these exemptions
could incentivize sector vessels to delay fishing trips until the
period of greater flexibility, potentially creating safety issues
because sector vessels would have less flexibility to time fishing
trips to optimal weather conditions. Furthermore, delaying
implementation would limit flexibility for sector vessels to time
fishing trips to market conditions, and revenues would be expected to
be lower.
This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order (E.O)
12866.
A Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) has been prepared
for this rule as required by Sec. 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA). The FRFA is comprised of the economic impacts identified in
the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), the preamble of the
proposed rule and this rule, the supplemental EA prepared for this
action, and the discussions, including responses to public comments,
included in this rule. This FRFA describes the economic impact that the
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description
of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained in the preamble to this final rule and in sections
1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 of the supplemental EA prepared for this action and,
thus, are not repeated here.
No issues were raised by public comments in response to the IRFA or
with respect to the economic impacts of this action. Accordingly, no
changes were made from the proposed rule as the result of any such
comments.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities To Which the
Final Rule Would Apply
This action would affect regulated entities engaged in commercial
fishing for groundfish that are enrolled in any one of the 17 sectors
that are operating in FY 2010. Anyone with a valid limited access
Federal permit under the NE Multispecies FMP is eligible to join a
sector. The Small Business Administration (SBA) size standard for
commercial fishing (NAICS code 114111) is $4 million in sales.
Available data indicate that, based on 2005-2007 average conditions,
median gross annual sales by commercial fishing vessels were just over
$200,000, and no single fishing entity earned more than $2 million
annually. Since available data are not adequate to identify affiliated
vessels, each operating unit is considered a small entity for purposes
of the RFA.
Description of the Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of the Final Rule
This final rule contains no collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Description of Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the Economic
Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
The EIS for Amendment 16 compares economic impacts of sector
measures with non-sector measures, and analyzes costs and benefits of
the universal exemptions. The proposed rule proposing approval of the
FY 2010 sector operations plans and contracts discussed the economic
impacts of the additional exemptions requested by sectors. This final
rule and the accompanying supplemental EA discuss the economic impacts
of approving the GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption, as well as expanding
the exemptions approved for FY 2010 sectors. The exemptions implemented
by this final rule would provide additional economic flexibility to
vessels already participating in NE multispecies sectors during FY
2010. All exemptions requested by the sectors are intended to provide
positive social and economic benefits to sector members and ports.
The GOM sink gillnet mesh exemption is being requested by Northeast
Fishery Sectors II and III, V-VIII, and X-XII, the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector, the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde Community
Groundfish Sector, and the Tri-State Sector, which represent 616
permits. The exemption
[[Page 80728]]
will allow the use of 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh gillnets in the GOM RMA
from January 1, 2011-April 30, 2011. This exemption would provide
participating sector vessels an opportunity to retain more GOM haddock,
a healthy stock, and share in the benefits from the stock recovery. To
utilize this exemption, it would be necessary for participating sector
vessels to purchase 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh gillnets. However, it would
allow a greater catch of haddock, which may increase revenues for
gillnet fishermen and the ports where they land their fish,
particularly if participating vessels are able to change fishing
behavior to selectively target this stock and minimize catch of other
allocated target stocks.
Exemption from the Day gillnet 120-day block requirement out of the
fishery is being approved for the Northeast Fishery Sectors II, V-VIII,
X and XII. Existing regulations require that vessels using gillnet gear
remove all gear from the water for 120 days per year. Since the time
out from fishing is up to the vessel owner to decide (with some
restrictions), many affected vessel owners have purchased more than one
vessel such that one may be used while the other is taking its 120-day
block out of the groundfish fishery, to provide for sustained fishing
income. Acquiring a second vessel adds the expense of outfitting
another vessel with gear and maintaining that vessel. The exemption
from the 120-day block could allow sector members to realize the cost
savings associated with retiring the redundant vessel. Furthermore,
this exemption could provide additional flexibility to sector vessels
to maximize the utility of other sector-specific and universal
exemptions, such as the exemption from the GB Seasonal Closure in May
and portions of the GOM Rolling Closure Areas. Several of the FY 2010
sectors, representing 390 permits, are already utilizing this
exemption. This final rule extends this flexibility and potential
economic benefits to an additional 226 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, and V-XIII, the GB Cod Fixed
Gear Sector, and the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector, are
granted an exemption from the required 20-day spawning block out of the
fishery. Exemption from the 20-day spawning block would improve
flexibility to match trip planning decisions to existing fishing and
market conditions. Although vessel owners currently have the
flexibility to schedule their 20-day block according to business needs
and may use that opportunity to perform routine or scheduled
maintenance, vessel owners may prefer to schedule these activities at
other times of the year, or may have unexpected repairs. Removing this
requirement may not have a significant impact, but could still provide
vessel owners with greater opportunity to make more efficient use of
their vessel. This exemption was previously approved for three sectors
representing 153 permits. Approval of this exemption for these
additional sectors extends the exemption to an additional 563 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, V-VIII, and X-XII, the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector, the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector, and the
Tri-State Sector, are granted an exemption from the limit on the number
of nets (not to exceed 150 in all RMAs) that may be deployed by Day
gillnet vessels. This exemption would provide greater flexibility to
deploy fishing gear by participating sector members according to
operational and market needs. In addition, approval of this exemption
could also maximize the utility of the GOM Sink Gillnet exemption for
those sectors approved for both because it would allow them to deploy
more nets under the GOM Sink Gillnet exemption. A total of 116 permits
participating in FY 2010 sectors are already exempt from this
requirement. This action extends this flexibility and potential
economic benefits to an additional 500 permits.
The Northeast Fishery Sectors II, V-VIII, X and XII, the GB Cod
Fixed Gear Sector, the Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde
Community Groundfish Sector, and the Tri-State Sector are being granted
an exemption from the prohibition on a vessel hauling gear that was set
by another vessel. The community fixed gear exemption allows sector
vessels in the Day gillnet category to effectively pool gillnet gear
that may be hauled or set by sector members. This provision could
reduce the total amount of gear that would have to be purchased and
maintained by participating sector members resulting in some uncertain
level of cost savings, along with a possible reduction in total gear
fished. This exemption has already been approved for 120 permits in FY
2010 sectors and is being approved for additional sectors through this
action, representing an additional 496 permits.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, V-VIII, and X-XII, the
Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector,
and the Tri-State Sector are granted an exemption from the limitation
on the number of gillnets that may be hauled on GB when fishing under a
groundfish/monkfish DAS. Approving this exemption would increase
operational flexibility for an additional 522 permits, providing an
opportunity for a substantial portion of the fleet to improve vessel
profitability.
The Northeast Fishery Sectors II and III, V-VIII, and X-XII, the
Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector,
the Tri-State Sector, and the Northeast Coastal Communities Sector,
representing an additional 540 permits, are granted an exemption from
the number of hooks that may be fished. These exemptions would provide
vessel owners in these additional sectors with the flexibility to adapt
the number of hooks fished to existing fishing and market conditions
and, thereby, improve vessel profitability. The exemption from the
number of hooks that may be fished has been granted to the GB Cod Hook
Sector each year since 2004 and was granted to the GB Cod Fixed Gear
Sector for FY 2010. Approval of this exemption for these additional
sectors extends the potential economic benefits to more vessels in
other sectors.
Northeast Fishery Sectors II-XIII, the GB Cod Fixed Gear Sector,
and the Port Clyde Community Groundfish Sector, are granted an
exemption from regulations that currently limit leasing of DAS to
vessels within specified length and horsepower restrictions. Current
restrictions create a system in which a small vessel may lease DAS from
virtually any other vessel, but is limited in the number of vessels
that it may lease to. The opposite is true for larger vessels.
Exemption from these restrictions allows greater flexibility to lease
DAS between vessels of different sizes and could expand the market of
potential lessees for some vessels. The efficiency gains of this
exemption as approved for the Tri-State Sector and the Sustainable
Harvest Sector were limited because the exemption would only apply to
leases between Tri-State Sector and Sustainable Harvest Sector members,
representing 135 permits. This action extends this exemption to an
additional 609 permits, which could not only potentially increase
efficiency for the additional sectors for which this exemption is
approved, but also for members of the Tri-State and Sustainable Harvest
Sectors by expanding the pool of potential lessees with this exemption.
Since DAS are not required while fishing for groundfish, the economic
importance of this exemption would be associated with the need to use
NE multispecies DAS when fishing in other fisheries, for example,
monkfish.
[[Page 80729]]
Economic Impacts of the Alternative to the Proposed Action
Under the No Action alternative, one or more of the sectors'
requests for operations plan addenda would be disapproved, which would
result in sector vessels operating under the operations plans and
exemptions as approved for the start of the 2010 FY in the sector
operations plan final rule published April 9, 2010. Under this
scenario, sector vessels may experience the efficiency gains and
economic benefits of sector participation and the exemptions for which
they have already been approved, as described in the IRFA for the
proposed rule proposing approval of FY 2010 sector operations and
exemptions. However, sector vessels would not be provided the
opportunity to benefit from the increase in the operational flexibility
that may be gained from all the exemptions available to FY 2010 sectors
and revenues would be expected to be lower than under the proposed
action. Relative to the proposed action, it is more likely under the No
Action alternative that the ports and fishing communities where sectors
plan to land their fish would be negatively impacted.
Allowing sectors to propose either entirely new exemptions or
variations of previously approved exemptions was considered. However,
this alternative was considered unreasonable because these exemptions
are discrete measures which, by their nature, do not lend themselves to
alternate configurations, and allowing sectors to propose entirely new
exemptions or changing already approved exemptions could result in
implementation delays that would reduce the utility of this action for
sectors in this fishing year (FY 2010). In addition, this action is
intended to be a continuing part of a longer action implementing
Amendment 16, Framework Adjustment 44 to the NE Multispecies FMP, and
the final rule approving FY 2010 sector operations plans, in which
other alternative measures have already been considered. The FY 2010
sectors will have an opportunity to propose any new or revised
exemptions in their operations plans for FY 2011.
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1966 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to sector members that also serves as
a small entity compliance guide (the guide) was prepared. Copies of
this final rule are available from the Regional Administrator. The
guide and this final rule will be available upon request.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-32340 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P