Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model GVI Airplane; High Incidence Protection, 80735-80738 [2010-32236]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
and provide evidence to support your
answers.
7. How should total fraction exposure
data be compared to inhalable fraction
exposure measurements? Please explain
your answer and provide evidence to
support your answer.
8. Should surface area action levels be
established, or should DOE consider
controlling the health risk of surface
levels by establishing a low airborne
action level that precludes beryllium
settling out on surfaces, and
administrative controls that prevent the
buildup of beryllium on surfaces? If
surface area action levels are
established, what should be the DOE
surface area action levels? If a low
airborne action level should be
established in lieu of the surface area
action level, what should that airborne
action level be? What, if any, additional
administrative controls to prevent the
buildup on surfaces should be
established? Please explain each of your
answers and provide evidence to
support your answers.
9. Should warning labels be required
for the transfer, to either another DOE
entity or to an entity to whom this rule
does not apply, of items with surface
areas that are free of removable surface
levels of beryllium but which may
contain surface contamination that is
inaccessible or has been sealed with
hard-to-remove substances, e.g., paint?
Please explain your answer and provide
evidence to support your answer.
10. Should the Department establish
both surface level and aggressive air
sampling criteria (modeled after the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
aggressive air sampling criteria to clear
an area after asbestos abatement) for
releasing areas in a facility, or should
the Department consider establishing
only the aggressive air sampling
criteria? Please explain your answers
and provide evidence to support your
answers.
11. Currently, after the site
occupational medicine director has
determined that a beryllium worker
should be medically removed from
exposure to beryllium, the worker must
consent to the removal. Should the
Department continue to require the
worker’s consent for medical removal,
or require mandatory medical removal?
Please explain your answers.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
20, 2010.
Glenn S. Podonsky,
Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer,
Office of Health, Safety and Security.
[FR Doc. 2010–32258 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM438 Special Conditions No.
25–10–03–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model
GVI Airplane; High Incidence
Protection
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Gulfstream GVI
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes associated with the use of high
incidence protection. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for these design features. These
proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: We must receive your comments
by February 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies
of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Attn: Rules Docket (ANM–
113), Docket No. NM438, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356. You may deliver two
copies to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. You
must mark your comments: Docket No.
NM438. You can inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane & Flightcrew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Standards Staff, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington, 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2011; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
80735
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions.
You can inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go
to the address in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive. If
you want us to acknowledge receipt of
your comments on this proposal,
include with your comments a selfaddressed, stamped postcard on which
you have written the docket number.
We will stamp the date on the postcard
and mail it back to you.
Background
On March 29, 2005, Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Gulfstream’’) applied for
an FAA type certificate for its new
Gulfstream Model GVI passenger
airplane. Gulfstream later applied for,
and was granted, an extension of time
for the type certificate, which changed
the effective application date to
September 28, 2006. The Gulfstream
Model GVI airplane will be an all-new,
two-engine jet transport airplane with
an executive cabin interior. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 99,600
pounds, with a maximum passenger
count of 19 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17,
Gulfstream must show that the
Gulfstream Model GVI airplane
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the GVI’’) meets
the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25–1
through 25–119, 25–122, and 25–124. If
the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the GVI because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to complying with the
applicable airworthiness regulations
and special conditions, the GVI must
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
80736
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must also issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy pursuant to section
611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design features, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The GVI is equipped with a novel or
unusual design feature: A high
incidence protection system that
replaces the stall warning system during
normal operating conditions, prohibits
the airplane from stalling, limits the
angle of attack at which the airplane can
be flown during normal low speed
operation, and cannot be overridden by
the flight crew. The system’s application
of this angle of attack limit impacts the
stall speed determination, the stall
characteristics, the stall warning
demonstration, and the longitudinal
airplane handling characteristics. The
current regulations, including §§ 25.103,
25.145, 25.201, 25.203, 25.207 and
25.1323, do not address this type of
protection feature.
Discussion of Proposed Special
Conditions
Special conditions are proposed to
address this novel or unusual design
feature of the GVI. These special
conditions, which include airplane
performance requirements, will
establish a level of safety equivalent to
the current regulations for reference
stall speeds, stall warning, stall
characteristics, and miscellaneous other
minimum reference speeds.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions are applicable to the
high incidence protection system on the
GVI. Should Gulfstream apply at a later
date for a change to the type certificate
to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design
features, these proposed special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features of the GVI. It
is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for the GVI
airplanes.
1. Definitions. For terminology that
does not appear in the regulations, the
following definitions apply to these
proposed special conditions:
(a) Electronic Flight Control System
(EFCS)—The electronic and software
command and control elements of the
flight control system.
(b) High Incidence Protection
Function—An airplane level function
that automatically limits the maximum
angle of attack that can be attained to a
value below that at which an
aerodynamic stall would occur.
(c) Alpha-Limit—The maximum angle
of attack at which the airplane stabilizes
with the high incidence protection
function operating and the longitudinal
control held on its aft stop.
(d) Vmin—The minimum stabilized
flight speed in calibrated airspeed
obtained when the airplane is
decelerated at an entry rate not
exceeding 1 knot/sec until the
longitudinal pilot control is on the aft
stop with the high incidence protection
function operating.
(e) Vmin1g—Vmin corrected to 1g
conditions. The minimum calibrated
airspeed at which the airplane can
develop a lift force normal to the flight
path and equal to its weight when at an
angle of attack not greater than that
determined for Vmin.
2. Capability and Reliability of the
High Incidence Protection System—In
lieu of §§ 25.103, 25.145, 25.201, 25.203,
25.207 and 25.1323 the following
special conditions are proposed for
capability and reliability requirements:
(a) It must not be possible during
pilot-induced maneuvers to encounter a
stall, and handling characteristics must
be acceptable as required by paragraphs
5 and 6 of this proposed special
condition.
(b) The airplane must be protected
against stalling due to the effects of
environmental conditions such as
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
windshear and gusts at low speeds as
required by paragraph 7 of this
proposed special condition.
(c) The ability of the high incidence
protection function to accommodate any
reduction in stalling angle of attack
resulting from flight in the atmospheric
icing conditions of 14 CFR part 25,
appendix C, must be verified.
(d) The reliability of the high
incidence protection function and the
effects of failures must be acceptable in
accordance with § 25.1309.
(e) The high incidence protection
function must not impede maneuvering
for pitch angles up to the maximum
required for normal maneuvering
including an all-engines operating
takeoff plus a suitable margin to allow
for satisfactory speed control.
3. Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed—In lieu of the
requirements of § 25.103, the following
special condition is proposed:
(a) Vmin—The minimum steady flight
speed, for the airplane configuration
under consideration and with the high
incidence protection function operating,
is the final stabilized calibrated airspeed
obtained when the airplane is
decelerated at an entry rate not
exceeding 1 knot per second until the
longitudinal pilot control is on its stop.
(b) The minimum steady flight speed,
Vmin, must be determined with:
(1) The high incidence protection
function operating normally.
(2) Idle thrust.
(3) All combinations of flap settings
and landing gear positions.
(4) The weight used when VSR is
being used as a factor to determine
compliance with a required
performance standard.
(5) The most unfavorable center of
gravity allowable.
(6) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed selected by the
applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and
not greater than 1.3 VSR.
(7) The settings of the high incidence
protection function, stall warning
system, and stall identification system
(if applicable) set at the low angle of
attack tolerance limit, unless the
production tolerances are acceptably
small so as to produce insignificant
changes in performance determinations.
(c) Vmin1g—Vmin corrected to 1g
conditions, which is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which the
airplane can develop a lift force normal
to the flight path and equal to its weight
when at an angle of attack not greater
than that determined for Vmin. Vmin1g
is defined as follows:
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Where:
VCLMAX is the calibrated airspeed obtained
when the load factor-corrected lift
coefficient
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
is first a maximum during the maneuver
prescribed in paragraph 3(e)(7) of this
special condition.
nZW = Load factor normal to the flight path
at VCLMAX
W = Airplane gross weight;
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
(e) VSR must be determined with the
following conditions:
(1) Engines idling, or, if that resultant
thrust causes an appreciable decrease in
stall speed, not more than zero thrust at
the stall speed.
(2) The airplane in other respects
(such as flaps and landing gear) in the
condition existing in the test or
performance standard in which VSR is
being used.
(3) The weight used when VSR is
being used as a factor to determine
compliance with a required
performance standard.
(4) The center of gravity position that
results in the highest value of reference
stall speed.
(5) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed selected by the
applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and
not greater than 1.3 VSR.
(6) The high incidence protection
function disabled, or adjusted to a high
enough incidence to allow full
development of the maneuver to the
angle of attack corresponding to VSR.
(7) From the stabilized trim condition,
apply the longitudinal control to
decelerate the airplane so that the speed
reduction does not exceed one knot per
second.
(f) The flight characteristics at the
angle of attack corresponding to VSR
must be suitable in the traditional sense
at forward and aft center of gravity in
straight and turning flight at IDLE
power.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
4. Stall Warning
(a) Normal Operation—If the
conditions of paragraph 2 of this
proposed special condition are satisfied,
a level of safety equivalent to that
intended by § 25.207, Stall warning, will
have been met.
(b) Failure Cases—Following failures
of the high incidence protection
function not shown to be extremely
improbable, if the function no longer
satisfies paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)
of this proposed special condition, stall
warning must be provided in
accordance with § 25.207. The stall
warning should prevent inadvertent
stall in the following conditions:
(1) Power off straight stall approaches
to a speed 5 percent below the warning
onset.
(2) Turning flight stall approaches
with at least 1.5g load factor normal to
the flight path at an entry rate of at least
2 knots per second when recovery is
initiated not less than one second after
the warning onset.
5. High Incidence Handling
Demonstrations—In lieu of the
requirements of § 25.201, the following
special conditions are proposed:
(a) Maneuvers to the limit of the
longitudinal control, in the nose up
direction, must be demonstrated in
straight flight and in 30 degree banked
turns under the following conditions:
(1) The high incidence protection
function operating normally.
(2) Power off.
(3) At a power level necessary to
maintain level flight at 1.5 VSR1, where
VSR1 is the reference stall speed with the
flaps in the approach position, the
landing gear retracted, and with the
aircraft at its maximum landing weight.
The flap position to be used to
determine this power setting is that
position in which the stall speed, VSR1,
does not exceed 110% of the stall speed,
VSR0, with the flaps in the most
extended landing position.
(b) In each condition required by
paragraph (a) of this section, it must be
possible to meet the applicable
requirements of § 25.203 defined in
paragraph 6 of this proposed special
condition with:
(1) Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited.
(2) Deceleration devices include
spoilers and other drag devices when
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
EP23DE10.006
(d) The reference stall speed, VSR, is
a calibrated airspeed selected by the
applicant. VSR may not be less than a 1g
stall speed. VSR is expressed as:
used as air brakes, and thrust reversers.
High incidence maneuver
demonstrations with deceleration
devices deployed should be carried out
with power off except where power is
normally applied during operations
(e.g., use of extended airbrakes during
landing).
(3) Representative weights within the
range for which certification is
requested.
(4) The most adverse center of gravity.
(5) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at the speed prescribed in
paragraph 3(e)(5) of this proposed
special condition.
(6) The settings of the high incidence
protection function, stall warning
system, and stall identification system
(if applicable) set at the high angle of
attack tolerance limit, unless the
production tolerances are acceptably
small so as to produce insignificant
changes in performance determinations.
(c) The following procedures must be
used to show compliance with § 25.203
as amended by paragraph 6 of this
proposed special condition:
(1) Starting at a speed sufficiently
above the minimum steady flight speed
to ensure that a steady rate of speed
reduction can be established, apply the
longitudinal control so that the speed
reduction does not exceed one knot per
second until the control reaches the
stop.
(2) The longitudinal control must be
maintained at the stop until the airplane
has reached a stabilized flight condition
and then recovered by normal recovery
techniques.
(3) The requirements for turning flight
maneuver demonstrations must also be
met with accelerated rates of entry to
the incidence limit, up to the maximum
rate achievable.
6. Characteristics in High Incidence
Maneuvers—In lieu of the requirements
of § 25.203, the following special
condition is proposed:
(a) Throughout maneuvers with a rate
of deceleration of not more than 1 knot
per second, both in straight flight and in
30 degree banked turns, the airplane’s
characteristics must be as follows:
(1) No abnormal airplane nose-up
pitching.
(2) No uncommanded nose-down
pitching (which is indicative of stall).
However, reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence
at alpha limit as the longitudinal control
reaches the stop is acceptable. Any
reduction of pitch attitude associated
with stabilizing the incidence at the
alpha limit should be achieved
smoothly and at a low pitch rate, so it
is not likely to be mistaken for natural
stall identification.
EP23DE10.005
Where:
nZW = load factor normal to the flight path
at Vmin.
(g) If VSR is chosen equal to VMIN,1g,
an equivalent safety finding to the intent
of § 25.103 may be considered to have
been met. The applicant may choose
VSR to be less than VMIN,1g but not less
than VS1g if compensating factors are
provided to ensure safe characteristics.
80737
EP23DE10.004
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
80738
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(3) No uncommanded lateral or
directional motion, and the pilot must
retain good lateral and directional
control by conventional use of the
cockpit controls throughout the
maneuver.
(4) The airplane must not exhibit
buffeting of a magnitude or severity that
would act as a deterrent to completing
the maneuver specified in § 25.201(a) as
amended by this proposed special
condition.
(b) In maneuvers with increased rates
of deceleration, some degradation of
characteristics associated with a
transient excursion beyond the
stabilized alpha-limit is acceptable.
However, the airplane must not exhibit
dangerous characteristics or
characteristics that would deter the pilot
from holding the longitudinal control on
the aft stop for a period of time
appropriate to the maneuvers.
(c) It must always be possible to
reduce incidence by conventional use of
the longitudinal control.
(d) The rate at which the airplane can
be maneuvered from trim speeds
associated with scheduled operating
speeds, such as V2 and VREF up to alphalimit, should not be unduly damped or
significantly slower than can be
achieved on conventionally controlled
transport airplanes.
7. Atmospheric Disturbances—
Operation of the high incidence
protection function must not adversely
affect aircraft control during expected
levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor
impede the application of recovery
procedures in case of windshear.
Simulator tests and analysis may be
used to evaluate such conditions, but
must be validated by limited flight
testing to confirm handling qualities at
critical loading conditions.
8. Longitudinal Control—In lieu of the
requirements of § 25.145(a), (a)(1) and
(b)(6), the following special conditions
are proposed:
(a) It must be possible, at any point
between the trim speed prescribed in
§ 25.103(b)(6) as amended by this
proposed special condition and Vmin,
to pitch the nose downward so that the
acceleration to this selected trim speed
is prompt.
(b) With the landing gear extended, no
change in trim control, or exertion of
more than 50 pounds control force
(representative of the maximum shortterm force that can be applied readily by
one hand) may be required for the
following maneuver: With power off,
flaps extended and the airplane
trimmed at 1.3 VSR1, obtain and
maintain airspeeds between Vmin and
either 1.6VSR1 or VFE, whichever is
lower.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
9. Airspeed Indicating System—In
lieu of § 25.1323(c)(1) and (c)(2), the
following special conditions are
proposed:
(a) VMO to Vmin with the flaps
retracted; and
(b) Vmin to VFE with flaps in the
landing position.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 13, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–32236 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0847; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–056–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 777–200, –200LR,
–300, and –300ER Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
We are revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Model 777–200, –200LR,
–300, and –300ER series airplanes. The
original NPRM would have required
doing an inspection to identify the part
number of the motor operated valve
(MOV) actuators of the main and center
fuel tanks; replacing certain MOV
actuators with new MOV actuators; and
measuring the electrical resistance of
the bond from the adapter plate to the
airplane structure, and doing corrective
actions if necessary. The original NPRM
also would have required revising the
Airworthiness Limitations section of the
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness. The original NPRM
resulted from fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer. This
action revises the original NPRM by
adding airplanes to the applicability.
This action also revises the original
NPRM by removing the requirement for
revising the Airworthiness Limitations
section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness. We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to prevent
electrical current from flowing through
an MOV actuator into a fuel tank, which
could create a potential ignition source
inside the fuel tank. This condition, in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by January 18,
2011.
DATES:
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
Tak
Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6499; fax (425) 917–6590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 80735-80738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32236]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM438 Special Conditions No. 25-10-03-SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model GVI Airplane; High Incidence
Protection
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Gulfstream GVI
airplane. This airplane will have novel or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category airplanes associated with the use of
high incidence protection. The applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for these design
features. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: We must receive your comments by February 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies of your comments to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn: Rules
Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM438, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356. You may deliver two copies to the Transport
Airplane Directorate at the above address. You must mark your comments:
Docket No. NM438. You can inspect comments in the Rules Docket
weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane &
Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Standards Staff,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-
2011; facsimile (425) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask
that you send us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions. You can inspect the docket before
and after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these special conditions based on the comments we receive. If you want
us to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this proposal, include
with your comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which you have
written the docket number. We will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
On March 29, 2005, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ``Gulfstream'') applied for an FAA type certificate for
its new Gulfstream Model GVI passenger airplane. Gulfstream later
applied for, and was granted, an extension of time for the type
certificate, which changed the effective application date to September
28, 2006. The Gulfstream Model GVI airplane will be an all-new, two-
engine jet transport airplane with an executive cabin interior. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 99,600 pounds, with a maximum passenger
count of 19 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
21.17, Gulfstream must show that the Gulfstream Model GVI airplane
(hereafter referred to as ``the GVI'') meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-119, 25-
122, and 25-124. If the Administrator finds that the applicable
airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the GVI because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to complying with the applicable airworthiness
regulations and special conditions, the GVI must
[[Page 80736]]
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR
part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must also issue a finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to
section 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design features, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The GVI is equipped with a novel or unusual design feature: A high
incidence protection system that replaces the stall warning system
during normal operating conditions, prohibits the airplane from
stalling, limits the angle of attack at which the airplane can be flown
during normal low speed operation, and cannot be overridden by the
flight crew. The system's application of this angle of attack limit
impacts the stall speed determination, the stall characteristics, the
stall warning demonstration, and the longitudinal airplane handling
characteristics. The current regulations, including Sec. Sec. 25.103,
25.145, 25.201, 25.203, 25.207 and 25.1323, do not address this type of
protection feature.
Discussion of Proposed Special Conditions
Special conditions are proposed to address this novel or unusual
design feature of the GVI. These special conditions, which include
airplane performance requirements, will establish a level of safety
equivalent to the current regulations for reference stall speeds, stall
warning, stall characteristics, and miscellaneous other minimum
reference speeds.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed special conditions are
applicable to the high incidence protection system on the GVI. Should
Gulfstream apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate
to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design
features, these proposed special conditions would apply to that model
as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
of the GVI. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for the GVI airplanes.
1. Definitions. For terminology that does not appear in the
regulations, the following definitions apply to these proposed special
conditions:
(a) Electronic Flight Control System (EFCS)--The electronic and
software command and control elements of the flight control system.
(b) High Incidence Protection Function--An airplane level function
that automatically limits the maximum angle of attack that can be
attained to a value below that at which an aerodynamic stall would
occur.
(c) Alpha-Limit--The maximum angle of attack at which the airplane
stabilizes with the high incidence protection function operating and
the longitudinal control held on its aft stop.
(d) Vmin--The minimum stabilized flight speed in calibrated
airspeed obtained when the airplane is decelerated at an entry rate not
exceeding 1 knot/sec until the longitudinal pilot control is on the aft
stop with the high incidence protection function operating.
(e) Vmin1g--Vmin corrected to 1g conditions. The minimum calibrated
airspeed at which the airplane can develop a lift force normal to the
flight path and equal to its weight when at an angle of attack not
greater than that determined for Vmin.
2. Capability and Reliability of the High Incidence Protection
System--In lieu of Sec. Sec. 25.103, 25.145, 25.201, 25.203, 25.207
and 25.1323 the following special conditions are proposed for
capability and reliability requirements:
(a) It must not be possible during pilot-induced maneuvers to
encounter a stall, and handling characteristics must be acceptable as
required by paragraphs 5 and 6 of this proposed special condition.
(b) The airplane must be protected against stalling due to the
effects of environmental conditions such as windshear and gusts at low
speeds as required by paragraph 7 of this proposed special condition.
(c) The ability of the high incidence protection function to
accommodate any reduction in stalling angle of attack resulting from
flight in the atmospheric icing conditions of 14 CFR part 25, appendix
C, must be verified.
(d) The reliability of the high incidence protection function and
the effects of failures must be acceptable in accordance with Sec.
25.1309.
(e) The high incidence protection function must not impede
maneuvering for pitch angles up to the maximum required for normal
maneuvering including an all-engines operating takeoff plus a suitable
margin to allow for satisfactory speed control.
3. Minimum Steady Flight Speed and Reference Stall Speed--In lieu
of the requirements of Sec. 25.103, the following special condition is
proposed:
(a) Vmin--The minimum steady flight speed, for the airplane
configuration under consideration and with the high incidence
protection function operating, is the final stabilized calibrated
airspeed obtained when the airplane is decelerated at an entry rate not
exceeding 1 knot per second until the longitudinal pilot control is on
its stop.
(b) The minimum steady flight speed, Vmin, must be determined with:
(1) The high incidence protection function operating normally.
(2) Idle thrust.
(3) All combinations of flap settings and landing gear positions.
(4) The weight used when VSR is being used as a factor
to determine compliance with a required performance standard.
(5) The most unfavorable center of gravity allowable.
(6) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed selected by
the applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and not greater
than 1.3 VSR.
(7) The settings of the high incidence protection function, stall
warning system, and stall identification system (if applicable) set at
the low angle of attack tolerance limit, unless the production
tolerances are acceptably small so as to produce insignificant changes
in performance determinations.
(c) Vmin1g--Vmin corrected to 1g conditions, which is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which the airplane can develop a lift force
normal to the flight path and equal to its weight when at an angle of
attack not greater than that determined for Vmin. Vmin1g is defined as
follows:
[[Page 80737]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23DE10.004
Where:
nZW = load factor normal to the flight path at
Vmin.
(d) The reference stall speed, VSR, is a calibrated
airspeed selected by the applicant. VSR may not be less than
a 1g stall speed. VSR is expressed as:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23DE10.005
Where:
VCLMAX is the calibrated airspeed obtained when the load factor-
corrected lift coefficient
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23DE10.006
is first a maximum during the maneuver prescribed in paragraph
3(e)(7) of this special condition.
nZW = Load factor normal to the flight path at
VCLMAX
W = Airplane gross weight;
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
(e) VSR must be determined with the following
conditions:
(1) Engines idling, or, if that resultant thrust causes an
appreciable decrease in stall speed, not more than zero thrust at the
stall speed.
(2) The airplane in other respects (such as flaps and landing gear)
in the condition existing in the test or performance standard in which
VSR is being used.
(3) The weight used when VSR is being used as a factor
to determine compliance with a required performance standard.
(4) The center of gravity position that results in the highest
value of reference stall speed.
(5) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed selected by
the applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and not greater
than 1.3 VSR.
(6) The high incidence protection function disabled, or adjusted to
a high enough incidence to allow full development of the maneuver to
the angle of attack corresponding to VSR.
(7) From the stabilized trim condition, apply the longitudinal
control to decelerate the airplane so that the speed reduction does not
exceed one knot per second.
(f) The flight characteristics at the angle of attack corresponding
to VSR must be suitable in the traditional sense at forward
and aft center of gravity in straight and turning flight at IDLE power.
(g) If VSR is chosen equal to VMIN,1g, an
equivalent safety finding to the intent of Sec. 25.103 may be
considered to have been met. The applicant may choose VSR to
be less than VMIN,1g but not less than VS1g if
compensating factors are provided to ensure safe characteristics.
4. Stall Warning
(a) Normal Operation--If the conditions of paragraph 2 of this
proposed special condition are satisfied, a level of safety equivalent
to that intended by Sec. 25.207, Stall warning, will have been met.
(b) Failure Cases--Following failures of the high incidence
protection function not shown to be extremely improbable, if the
function no longer satisfies paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) of this
proposed special condition, stall warning must be provided in
accordance with Sec. 25.207. The stall warning should prevent
inadvertent stall in the following conditions:
(1) Power off straight stall approaches to a speed 5 percent below
the warning onset.
(2) Turning flight stall approaches with at least 1.5g load factor
normal to the flight path at an entry rate of at least 2 knots per
second when recovery is initiated not less than one second after the
warning onset.
5. High Incidence Handling Demonstrations--In lieu of the
requirements of Sec. 25.201, the following special conditions are
proposed:
(a) Maneuvers to the limit of the longitudinal control, in the nose
up direction, must be demonstrated in straight flight and in 30 degree
banked turns under the following conditions:
(1) The high incidence protection function operating normally.
(2) Power off.
(3) At a power level necessary to maintain level flight at 1.5
VSR1, where VSR1 is the reference stall speed
with the flaps in the approach position, the landing gear retracted,
and with the aircraft at its maximum landing weight. The flap position
to be used to determine this power setting is that position in which
the stall speed, VSR1, does not exceed 110% of the stall
speed, VSR0, with the flaps in the most extended landing
position.
(b) In each condition required by paragraph (a) of this section, it
must be possible to meet the applicable requirements of Sec. 25.203
defined in paragraph 6 of this proposed special condition with:
(1) Flaps, landing gear, and deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited.
(2) Deceleration devices include spoilers and other drag devices
when used as air brakes, and thrust reversers. High incidence maneuver
demonstrations with deceleration devices deployed should be carried out
with power off except where power is normally applied during operations
(e.g., use of extended airbrakes during landing).
(3) Representative weights within the range for which certification
is requested.
(4) The most adverse center of gravity.
(5) The airplane trimmed for straight flight at the speed
prescribed in paragraph 3(e)(5) of this proposed special condition.
(6) The settings of the high incidence protection function, stall
warning system, and stall identification system (if applicable) set at
the high angle of attack tolerance limit, unless the production
tolerances are acceptably small so as to produce insignificant changes
in performance determinations.
(c) The following procedures must be used to show compliance with
Sec. 25.203 as amended by paragraph 6 of this proposed special
condition:
(1) Starting at a speed sufficiently above the minimum steady
flight speed to ensure that a steady rate of speed reduction can be
established, apply the longitudinal control so that the speed reduction
does not exceed one knot per second until the control reaches the stop.
(2) The longitudinal control must be maintained at the stop until
the airplane has reached a stabilized flight condition and then
recovered by normal recovery techniques.
(3) The requirements for turning flight maneuver demonstrations
must also be met with accelerated rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to the maximum rate achievable.
6. Characteristics in High Incidence Maneuvers--In lieu of the
requirements of Sec. 25.203, the following special condition is
proposed:
(a) Throughout maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of not more
than 1 knot per second, both in straight flight and in 30 degree banked
turns, the airplane's characteristics must be as follows:
(1) No abnormal airplane nose-up pitching.
(2) No uncommanded nose-down pitching (which is indicative of
stall). However, reasonable attitude changes associated with
stabilizing the incidence at alpha limit as the longitudinal control
reaches the stop is acceptable. Any reduction of pitch attitude
associated with stabilizing the incidence at the alpha limit should be
achieved smoothly and at a low pitch rate, so it is not likely to be
mistaken for natural stall identification.
[[Page 80738]]
(3) No uncommanded lateral or directional motion, and the pilot
must retain good lateral and directional control by conventional use of
the cockpit controls throughout the maneuver.
(4) The airplane must not exhibit buffeting of a magnitude or
severity that would act as a deterrent to completing the maneuver
specified in Sec. 25.201(a) as amended by this proposed special
condition.
(b) In maneuvers with increased rates of deceleration, some
degradation of characteristics associated with a transient excursion
beyond the stabilized alpha-limit is acceptable. However, the airplane
must not exhibit dangerous characteristics or characteristics that
would deter the pilot from holding the longitudinal control on the aft
stop for a period of time appropriate to the maneuvers.
(c) It must always be possible to reduce incidence by conventional
use of the longitudinal control.
(d) The rate at which the airplane can be maneuvered from trim
speeds associated with scheduled operating speeds, such as
V2 and VREF up to alpha-limit, should not be
unduly damped or significantly slower than can be achieved on
conventionally controlled transport airplanes.
7. Atmospheric Disturbances--Operation of the high incidence
protection function must not adversely affect aircraft control during
expected levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor impede the application
of recovery procedures in case of windshear. Simulator tests and
analysis may be used to evaluate such conditions, but must be validated
by limited flight testing to confirm handling qualities at critical
loading conditions.
8. Longitudinal Control--In lieu of the requirements of Sec.
25.145(a), (a)(1) and (b)(6), the following special conditions are
proposed:
(a) It must be possible, at any point between the trim speed
prescribed in Sec. 25.103(b)(6) as amended by this proposed special
condition and Vmin, to pitch the nose downward so that the acceleration
to this selected trim speed is prompt.
(b) With the landing gear extended, no change in trim control, or
exertion of more than 50 pounds control force (representative of the
maximum short-term force that can be applied readily by one hand) may
be required for the following maneuver: With power off, flaps extended
and the airplane trimmed at 1.3 VSR1, obtain and maintain
airspeeds between Vmin and either 1.6VSR1 or VFE,
whichever is lower.
9. Airspeed Indicating System--In lieu of Sec. 25.1323(c)(1) and
(c)(2), the following special conditions are proposed:
(a) VMO to Vmin with the flaps retracted; and
(b) Vmin to VFE with flaps in the landing position.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 13, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-32236 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P