Preparation of the PEIS for Modernization of Training Infrastructure at Pōhakuloa Training Area, HI, 80799-80800 [2010-32177]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain Jeff Basa at (512) 782–7924 or
by e-mail at
txarng.landpurchase@ng.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Army
has identified the need for land
acquisition and use of approximately
22,232 acres of land to enhance realistic
training conditions. No adequate
maneuver training land is currently
available within a suitable travel time
for the three TXARNG Battalions
stationed in south Texas. The Army
proposes land acquisition of
approximately 22,232 acres for
additional maneuver training land to
meet the training needs of the TXARNG.
This additional land will enhance
training and will allow Soldiers to train
to more realistic standards in
preparation for operational deployment
at a site located closer to their home
communities. The Army Training
Division, National Guard Bureau, is the
action proponent; the land would be
owned by the Army and licensed to the
TXARNG.
The TXARNG PEIS will analyze the
environmental and socioeconomic
impacts of land acquisition to establish
the STTC. The land acquisition
alternative is located adjacent to and
northeast of the existing U.S. Navyowned Dixie Range in McMullen
County. A PEIS is proposed for this
analysis to address the implementation
of the RPMP, which would consist of a
number of construction phases to be
implemented over an extended
timeframe (estimated 15 to 20 years).
This PEIS would analyze the general
development of a cantonment area,
training areas, and infrastructure
support. Separate environmental
analyses may be required at a later date,
as necessary, for development not
covered within this PEIS. The Army No
Action Alternative will evaluate the
impacts of taking no action to acquire
additional training land. Resources and
issues that will be evaluated in the PEIS
include changes in land use from
private hunting lands to military
training lands; potential impacts to
biological, cultural, and water resources;
changes in transportation and traffic in
the region. At this point, we do not
anticipate any significant impacts.
Additional concerns raised during the
initial public involvement process will
also be addressed in the PEIS.
The Notice of Intent can be viewed at
https://www.agd.state.tx.us. Scoping and
Public Comment: Federally recognized
tribes, federal, state, and local agencies,
and the public are invited to participate
in the scoping process for the
preparation of the PEIS. The scoping
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
process will include one public scoping
meeting, which is an opportunity for the
public to receive information about the
proposed action and alternatives and to
assist the Army in identifying potential
environmental impacts and key issues
of concern to be analyzed in the PEIS.
The meeting will be held in McMullen
County, Texas. Notification of the time
and location for the scoping meeting
will be announced in local media
sources. To ensure scoping comments
are fully considered in the preparation
of the PEIS, comments and suggestions
should be received within the 30-day
scoping period. The public will also be
invited to review and comment on the
Draft PEIS when it is available for
review. Notification letters will be
mailed to Native American tribes,
federal, state, and local agencies
regarding the scoping process and Draft
PEIS availability. A public meeting will
take place during the comment period
on the Draft PEIS and the public will be
invited to share their views and
concerns. Comments from the public
will be considered before any decision
is made regarding implementing the
proposed action.
Dated: December 13, 2010.
Hershell E. Wolfe,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Environment, Safety, and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 2010–32176 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Preparation of the PEIS for
Modernization of Training
¯
Infrastructure at Pohakuloa Training
Area, HI
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The United States Army
Pacific (USARPAC) and United States
Army Garrison, Hawai‘i (USAG–HI)
intend to prepare a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
for modernizing training ranges, training
support infrastructure (roads and
utilities), and training support facilities
¯
in the cantonment area at Pohakuloa
Training Area (PTA) to meet better the
readiness needs of military units in
Hawai‘i. The PEIS will evaluate PTA’s
long-term vision for modernizing
training ranges, training support
infrastructure, and the cantonment area
to improve a current shortfall in
collective (group) live-fire training
capabilities for units stationed in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80799
Hawai‘i. The PEIS also includes an
analysis for constructing and operating
an Infantry Platoon Battle Area (IPBA)
that would include an Infantry Platoon
Battle Course (IPBC), Live-fire
Shoothouse, and Military Operations on
Urban Terrain (MOUT) facility. The
IPBC would augment the existing nonstandard IPBC (located at Range 10 on
PTA), which is undersized and cannot
be modernized in its current footprint.
The Range 10 IPBC would continue to
be used for non-standard collective livefire training exercises.
Many of the training ranges and
infrastructure at PTA do not meet
current doctrinal training and standard
range design requirements. Many of the
range assets at PTA also do not have
sufficient throughput capacity to meet
collective live-fire training
requirements.
Alternatives analyzed in the PEIS will
consider modernizing the training
ranges, training support infrastructure,
and the cantonment area at PTA, and a
No Action alternative. Under the No
Action alternative, the Army would
continue utilizing current training lands
and facilities as efficiently as possible.
The PEIS will also present a range of
alternatives for the IPBA at either the
Western Range Area of PTA, Charlie’s
Circle, or along the southwest side of
Range 20, or to not build and operate
the IPBA at all.
The primary environmental issues to
be analyzed in the PEIS include (but are
not limited to) air quality, traffic,
biological resources, cultural resources,
public services and utilities, wildfires,
and hazardous materials and waste.
There could be significant impacts to
cultural resources, air quality, and risk
from igniting wildfires. Also, we
anticipate that some federally-listed
threatened or endangered plants would
be affected. Predicted environmental
impacts associated with implementing
the initial range project of constructing
and operating the IPBA will be analyzed
to include an increase in vehicle traffic,
air quality impacts, and live-fire
activities at currently underutilized
range locations at PTA. The proposed
action may increase the risk of igniting
wildfires or may result in a loss of
cultural resources. The Army will
identify mitigation measures that could
be implemented to reduce or eliminate
adverse impacts to the environmental
resources.
Written comments may be
addressed to PTA PEIS, P.O. Box 514,
Honolulu, HI 96809; facsimiles may be
sent to (808) 545–6808; e-mail may be
addressed to PTAPEIS@bah.com.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
80800
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
USAG–HI Public Affairs by phone at
(808) 656–3152 during normal business
hours Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to
5 p.m. HST.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed action considers modernizing
the training ranges, training support
infrastructure, and the cantonment area
at PTA. The Army’s proposed action is
supportive of Training Circular 25–8
Training Ranges (TC 25–8), the National
Security Strategy (NSS, 2010) and the
Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR
2010); these strategic documents have
been incorporated into the Army’s
decision making process. The purpose
of the proposed action (modernization)
is to reduce a shortfall in collective livefire training capability in Hawai’i and
improve the infrastructure that supports
the training capability.
An IPBC is used to train and test
infantry platoons, either mounted or
dismounted, on the skills necessary to
conduct tactical movement techniques
and detect, identify, engage, and defeat
stationary and moving infantry and
armor targets in a tactical array. A
standard IPBC is approximately 500
meter (m) wide at the initial engagement
entry point and 1,500m wide at the final
engagement point and 4,000m long. The
Army plans to construct an IPBC that
would be 1,000m wide at the initial
engagement entry point to add
flexibility for unit commanders to train
against additional objectives supporting
combat scenarios experienced in the
contemporary combat environment.
A Live-fire Shoothouse and MOUT
facility would be sited in the immediate
vicinity of the IPBC. The Shoothouse
would provide Army unit leaders with
a facility to train and evaluate the unit
during a live-fire exercise. Soldiers
would fire small arms weapons at
targets within the facility. The range
would include associated range
operations and control facilities, an
operations/storage building, latrine, and
after-action review (AAR) facility. The
primary facility of the Shoothouse
would be a two-story building
approximately 4,700 square feet, with
stairways and a roof.
The MOUT facility would include the
construction or placement of
approximately 24 modular structures to
replicate small villages for units to
complete training tasks in an urban/
semi-urban operating environment.
There is no standard design for a MOUT
facility. The MOUT facility footprint at
PTA would be approximately 800 feet
by 800 feet or 640,000 square feet.
Predicted environmental impacts
associated with the modernization of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
PTA may include actions that have both
positive (beneficial) and adverse
impacts to the environmental resources
at PTA.
Each proposed IPBA live-fire
alternative location under consideration
is either in or directly adjacent to the
existing impact area at PTA.
Based on public scoping and factors
discussed above, the Army will refine
its range of reasonable alternatives to
the extent possible to accommodate
mission requirements. In reaching this
decision, the Army will assess and
consider public concerns.
Scoping and Public Comment: All
interested members of the public,
including Federally recognized Indian
Tribes, Native Hawai‘ian groups, and
Federal, state, and local agencies are
invited to participate in the scoping
process for the preparation of this PEIS.
Written comments identifying
environmental issues, concerns and
opportunities to be analyzed in the PEIS
will be accepted for 45 days following
publication of the Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register. Scoping meetings will
be held on the Island of Hawai’i.
Notification of the times and locations
for the scoping meetings will be
published in local newspapers.
Dated: December 16, 2010.
Hershell E. Wolfe,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Environment, Safety, and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 2010–32177 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Availability of GovernmentOwned Inventions; Available for
Licensing
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The inventions listed below
are assigned to the United States
Government as represented by the
Secretary of the Navy and are made
available for licensing by the
Department of the Navy.
Navy Case No. 83951—Apparatus and
System for Data Surveillance; Navy Case
No. 84021—System and Method for
Improved Patient Status Monitoring;
Navy Case No. 97188—Software
Architecture for Access Control Based
on Hierarchical Characteristics; Navy
Case No. 97189—System of Access
Control Based on Hierarchical
Characteristics; Navy Case No.
97556—Preparation of SERS Substrates
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on Silica-Coated Magnetic
Microspheres; Navy Case No. 98163—
Algorithm for minimum antenna size;
Navy Case No. 98184—MEMS–Based
Multi-Channel Fabry-Perot
Interferometer System with Increased
Tuning Range and Resolution; Navy
Case No. 98330—System and Method
for Geodesic Data Mining; Navy Case
No. 98408—Method for Determining
Collision Risk for Collision Avoidance
Systems; Navy Case No. 98582—
Electrolytic Fluid Antenna; Navy Case
No. 98666—Plasmonic Transistor; Navy
Case No. 98721—Static Wireless DataGlove Apparatus for Gesture Processing
and Recognition and InformationCoding and Input Method; Navy Case
No. 98722—Host-Centric Method for
Automatic Collision Avoidance
Decisions; Navy Case No. 98745—
Method of Fabricating A Micro-ElectroMechanical Apparatus for Generating
Power Responsive to Mechanical
Vibration; Navy Case No. 98763—
Hydrostatic Actuated Flood Plug; Navy
Case No. 99735—Apparatus for
Generating Power Responsive to
Mechanical Vibration; Navy Case No.
99740—Tunable Resonant Frequency
MEMS Kinetic Energy Harvester; Navy
Case No. 99741—Improved ElectroMagnetic Kinetic Energy Harvesting
Device Using Increased Magnetic Edge
Area; Navy Case No. 99846—Method for
Fusing Overhead Imagery with
Automatic Vessel Reporting Systems;
Navy Case No. 99933—Improved
Electrolytic Fluid Antenna; Navy Case
No. 100162—Method for Detecting and
Mapping Fires Using Features Extracted
from Overhead Imagery; Navy Case No.
100190—Device for Maximizing Packing
Density with Cylindrical Objects in
Cylindrical Cavities; Navy Case No.
100225—Plasmonic Logic Device; Navy
Case No. 100249—Shipboard Winch
with Guide Vanes; Navy Case No.
100474—A System and Method for
Learning Visual Recognition through
Reusable Symbolic Pattern Matching;
Navy Case No. 100345—Stand-Off
Charging for Batteries; Navy Case No.
100447—Conformal Faraday Effect
Antenna; Navy Case No. 100340—
Shipboard Antenna Virtual Tuning
System and Method; Navy Case No.
100545—Method for Maximizing
Packing Density with Cylindrical
Objects in Cylindrical Cavities; Navy
Case No. 100678—Battery Tray Holder
with Electrical Conductor for Holding
Cylindrical Battery Cells; Navy Case No.
100311—System for Amplifying FlowInduced Vibration Energy Using
Boundary Layer and Wake Flow
Control; Navy Case No. 100341—
Simplified System Status Advisor
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80799-80800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32177]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Preparation of the PEIS for Modernization of Training
Infrastructure at P[omacr]hakuloa Training Area, HI
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Army Pacific (USARPAC) and United States
Army Garrison, Hawai`i (USAG-HI) intend to prepare a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for modernizing training ranges,
training support infrastructure (roads and utilities), and training
support facilities in the cantonment area at P[omacr]hakuloa Training
Area (PTA) to meet better the readiness needs of military units in
Hawai`i. The PEIS will evaluate PTA's long-term vision for modernizing
training ranges, training support infrastructure, and the cantonment
area to improve a current shortfall in collective (group) live-fire
training capabilities for units stationed in Hawai`i. The PEIS also
includes an analysis for constructing and operating an Infantry Platoon
Battle Area (IPBA) that would include an Infantry Platoon Battle Course
(IPBC), Live-fire Shoothouse, and Military Operations on Urban Terrain
(MOUT) facility. The IPBC would augment the existing non-standard IPBC
(located at Range 10 on PTA), which is undersized and cannot be
modernized in its current footprint. The Range 10 IPBC would continue
to be used for non-standard collective live-fire training exercises.
Many of the training ranges and infrastructure at PTA do not meet
current doctrinal training and standard range design requirements. Many
of the range assets at PTA also do not have sufficient throughput
capacity to meet collective live-fire training requirements.
Alternatives analyzed in the PEIS will consider modernizing the
training ranges, training support infrastructure, and the cantonment
area at PTA, and a No Action alternative. Under the No Action
alternative, the Army would continue utilizing current training lands
and facilities as efficiently as possible.
The PEIS will also present a range of alternatives for the IPBA at
either the Western Range Area of PTA, Charlie's Circle, or along the
southwest side of Range 20, or to not build and operate the IPBA at
all.
The primary environmental issues to be analyzed in the PEIS include
(but are not limited to) air quality, traffic, biological resources,
cultural resources, public services and utilities, wildfires, and
hazardous materials and waste. There could be significant impacts to
cultural resources, air quality, and risk from igniting wildfires.
Also, we anticipate that some federally-listed threatened or endangered
plants would be affected. Predicted environmental impacts associated
with implementing the initial range project of constructing and
operating the IPBA will be analyzed to include an increase in vehicle
traffic, air quality impacts, and live-fire activities at currently
underutilized range locations at PTA. The proposed action may increase
the risk of igniting wildfires or may result in a loss of cultural
resources. The Army will identify mitigation measures that could be
implemented to reduce or eliminate adverse impacts to the environmental
resources.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be addressed to PTA PEIS, P.O. Box 514,
Honolulu, HI 96809; facsimiles may be sent to (808) 545-6808; e-mail
may be addressed to PTAPEIS@bah.com.
[[Page 80800]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: USAG-HI Public Affairs by phone at
(808) 656-3152 during normal business hours Monday through Friday 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. HST.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action considers modernizing
the training ranges, training support infrastructure, and the
cantonment area at PTA. The Army's proposed action is supportive of
Training Circular 25-8 Training Ranges (TC 25-8), the National Security
Strategy (NSS, 2010) and the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR 2010);
these strategic documents have been incorporated into the Army's
decision making process. The purpose of the proposed action
(modernization) is to reduce a shortfall in collective live-fire
training capability in Hawai'i and improve the infrastructure that
supports the training capability.
An IPBC is used to train and test infantry platoons, either mounted
or dismounted, on the skills necessary to conduct tactical movement
techniques and detect, identify, engage, and defeat stationary and
moving infantry and armor targets in a tactical array. A standard IPBC
is approximately 500 meter (m) wide at the initial engagement entry
point and 1,500m wide at the final engagement point and 4,000m long.
The Army plans to construct an IPBC that would be 1,000m wide at the
initial engagement entry point to add flexibility for unit commanders
to train against additional objectives supporting combat scenarios
experienced in the contemporary combat environment.
A Live-fire Shoothouse and MOUT facility would be sited in the
immediate vicinity of the IPBC. The Shoothouse would provide Army unit
leaders with a facility to train and evaluate the unit during a live-
fire exercise. Soldiers would fire small arms weapons at targets within
the facility. The range would include associated range operations and
control facilities, an operations/storage building, latrine, and after-
action review (AAR) facility. The primary facility of the Shoothouse
would be a two-story building approximately 4,700 square feet, with
stairways and a roof.
The MOUT facility would include the construction or placement of
approximately 24 modular structures to replicate small villages for
units to complete training tasks in an urban/semi-urban operating
environment. There is no standard design for a MOUT facility. The MOUT
facility footprint at PTA would be approximately 800 feet by 800 feet
or 640,000 square feet.
Predicted environmental impacts associated with the modernization
of PTA may include actions that have both positive (beneficial) and
adverse impacts to the environmental resources at PTA.
Each proposed IPBA live-fire alternative location under
consideration is either in or directly adjacent to the existing impact
area at PTA.
Based on public scoping and factors discussed above, the Army will
refine its range of reasonable alternatives to the extent possible to
accommodate mission requirements. In reaching this decision, the Army
will assess and consider public concerns.
Scoping and Public Comment: All interested members of the public,
including Federally recognized Indian Tribes, Native Hawai`ian groups,
and Federal, state, and local agencies are invited to participate in
the scoping process for the preparation of this PEIS. Written comments
identifying environmental issues, concerns and opportunities to be
analyzed in the PEIS will be accepted for 45 days following publication
of the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register. Scoping meetings will
be held on the Island of Hawai'i. Notification of the times and
locations for the scoping meetings will be published in local
newspapers.
Dated: December 16, 2010.
Hershell E. Wolfe,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety, and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 2010-32177 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P