The Low-Income Definition, 80677-80678 [2010-32130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Secretary under delegated authority,
December 14, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
living. 73 FR 22836 (April 28, 2008). In
brief, the Board proposed to, and as
adopted in the final rule, did replace
median household income with median
family income or median earnings for
individuals as better measures, more
flexible, and in line with standards used
by other Federal agencies. 73 FR 71909
(Nov. 26, 2008).
As discussed in the preamble to the
final rule, NCUA also undertook as part
of the regulatory changes to facilitate the
low-income designation process by
eliminating the requirement for credit
unions to apply for the designation.
NCUA is in the process of implementing
geo-coding software to make the
calculation automatically for credit
unions during the examination process.
NCUA is amending the
definition of ‘‘low-income members’’ to
clarify that, in determining if a credit
union qualifies for a low-income
designation, the comparison of credit
union data, whether individual or
family income data, must be with
statistical data for the same category.
The amendment will clarify the
intention of the original regulatory text
so it is consistent with the geo-coding
software the agency uses to make the
low-income credit union (LICU)
designation.
NCUA will make the determination of
whether a majority of an FCU’s members are
low-income based on data it obtains during
the examination process. This will involve
linking member address information to
publicly available information from the U.S.
Census Bureau to estimate member earnings.
Using automated, geo-coding software,
NCUA will use member street addresses
collected during FCU examinations to
determine the geographic area and
metropolitan area for each member account.
NCUA will then use income information for
the geographic area from the Census Bureau
and assign estimated earnings to each
member.
[FR Doc. 2010–31824 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133–AD75
The Low-Income Definition
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Effective December 23, 2010 this
rule finalizes without change, the
interim final rule published on August
5, 2010, 75 FR 47171 (Aug. 5, 2010).
That interim rule was effective upon
publication on August 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Metz, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428, or
telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
DATES:
Background
The Federal Credit Union Act (Act)
authorizes the NCUA Board (Board) to
define ‘‘low-income members’’ so that
credit unions with a membership
consisting of predominantly low-income
members can benefit from certain
statutory relief and receive assistance
from the Community Development
Revolving Loan Fund. 12 U.S.C.
1752(5), 1757a(b)(2)(A), 1757a(c)(2)(B),
1772c–1. This authority has been
implemented in § 701.34 of NCUA
regulations, known as the low-income
rule. 12 CFR 701.34. In April 2008, the
Board proposed substantial changes to
the rule, which had previously been
based on measuring median household
income, with geographic differentials
for certain areas with higher costs of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
73 FR at 71910–11. NCUA’s software
ensures that the same categories of data
available for member income at a
particular credit union are compared
with like categories of statistical data on
income from the Census Bureau. In
particular, individual member earnings
information is compared to median
individual earnings data and family
income information is compared to
median family income data.1
The final rule in November 2008 also
provided credit unions, as an alternative
1 NCUA’s geo-coding software, known within the
agency as the ‘‘Low-Income Designation Assessment
Tool,’’ is currently a stand-alone software program
developed by NCUA’s Office of the Chief
Information Officer with guidance from regional
staff experienced in low-income designation.
Regional staff as well as Economic Development
Specialists currently use the tool as needed based
on requests from credit unions. Eventually, the
same software rules will be embedded into the
NCUA AIRES examination software. The current
version performs 30 different ratio calculations for
each member based on a variety of factors and data
to determine whether the member meets the lowincome definition. The variety of ratios is expansive
in order to provide all of the possible options for
members to meet the definition. Factors recognize
the following: (1) Data sources include both
decennial income data as well as American
Community Survey income data; (2) different data
is incorporated for metro vs. non-metro geographic
areas; and (3) ratio options include comparisons of
census tract and block group income data, to zip
code, county, MSA, state, and national data, plus
comparisons of county income data to CBSA, state,
and national income data.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80677
to relying on NCUA’s geo-coding
software, the option of providing actual
income information about their
members as a basis for qualifying as a
LICU. Confusion has arisen regarding
the appropriate comparison of actual
member information and statistical data
from the Census Bureau, prompting the
need for this clarifying amendment. The
confusion arises from a discussion in
the preamble to the final rule, where the
Board stated:
The rule also provides an alternative basis
for an FCU to qualify for a LICU designation.
An FCU may be able to demonstrate the
actual income of its members based on data
it has, for example, from loan applications or
surveys of its members. An FCU may qualify
as a LICU if it can establish a majority of its
members meet the low-income formula. For
example, an FCU with 1,000 members may
be able to show the actual income of 501 or
more of its members is equal to or less than
80% of the MFI for the metropolitan area(s)
where they live. As a practical matter, the
Board thinks few FCUs will need this option
because NCUA’s approach of matching
member residential information with Census
Bureau income information will provide an
estimate very close to members’ actual
income.
73 FR at 71911. The rule provides
median family income or median
individual earnings as alternatives and,
as noted above, NCUA’s geo-coding
software compares like categories of
data. Unfortunately, the above-quoted
statement in the preamble indicated
that, as an alternative to relying on the
NCUA’s geo-coding, a credit union
could apply for a low-income
designation relying on a comparison of
actual income data for individual
members to statistical data on median
family income as the basis for the
designation. This would not be a valid
or meaningful comparison. The Board
believes that, as a matter of logic and
statistical reasoning, only like categories
of data may be compared in making the
determination that a credit union’s
membership meets the low-income
definition. Actual individual member
income information should not be
measured against median family
income, but rather, against individual
median earnings.
Interim Final Rule and Comments
In July 2010, the Board issued an
interim final rule amending
§ 701.34(a)(1) by clarifying that median
family income and median earnings for
individuals are alternative bases on
which credit union members may
qualify as low income. 75 FR 47171
(Aug. 5, 2010). In addition, the interim
final rule amended the subsection of the
rule regarding the option for credit
unions to submit their own information
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
80678
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
for purposes of qualifying for the
designation to clarify that actual
member data must be compared with a
like category of statistical data.
NCUA received three comment
letters: One from a federal credit union
and two from credit union trade
associations. All three commenters
supported the clarification in the
interim final rule. The two trade
associations, commenting on an issue
outside the scope of the interim final
rule, urged the NCUA to consider
further amendment of the low-income
rule to permit credit unions that do not
qualify under NCUA’s geo-coding
software to use a statistically valid,
random sample of member income data
to support a designation as a lowincome credit union. Concurrent with
issuing this final rule, the Board is
separately issuing a proposed rule
addressing the use of a statistically
valid, random sample to support the
low-income designation.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact any regulation may have on a
substantial number of small entities. 5
U.S.C. 603(a). For purposes of this
analysis, NCUA considers credit unions
having under $10 million in assets small
entities. Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement 03–2, 68 FR 31949 (May 29,
2003). As of December 31, 2007, out of
approximately 8,410 federally insured
credit unions, 3,599 had less than $10
million in assets. This interim final rule
merely clarifies the existing low-income
rule and, therefore, an analysis is not
required. NCUA, however, provided an
analysis when it issued the final rule in
November 2008, concluding that the
economic impact on entities affected by
the rule would not be significant. 73 FR
71911–12.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996, Public Law 104–121, provides
generally for congressional review of
agency rules. A reporting requirement is
triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section
551 of the Administrative Procedures
Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this final rule is not a
major rule for purposes of SBREFA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Dec 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Paperwork Reduction Act
This clarifying amendment does not
change the collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. The final rule will not have
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined this final rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this final
rule will not affect family well-being
within the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Federal credit unions,
Low income, Nonmember deposits,
Secondary capital, Shares.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board, on December 16,
2010.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons stated above, NCUA
amends 12 CFR part 701 as follows:
■
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 12 CFR part 701 which was
published at 75 FR 47171 on August 5,
2010, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–32130 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12 CFR Parts 708a and 708b
RIN 3133–AD84; 3133–AD85
Conversions of Insured Credit Unions
Executive Order 13132
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
NCUA is issuing final
amendments to revise the definition of
the phrase ‘‘Regional Director’’ in
NCUA’s rule on credit union to mutual
savings bank conversions and to add the
same revised definition of that phrase to
NCUA’s rule on conversions to
nonfederal deposit insurance.
DATES: The rule is effective December
23, 2010. Comments must be received
by January 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web site: https://www.ncua.
gov/Resources/RegulationsOpinions
Laws/FinalRegulations.aspx. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on ‘‘Interim Final
Rulemaking for Parts 708a and 708b—
Definition of ‘‘Regional Director’’ in the
e-mail subject line.
Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the subject
line described above for e-mail.
Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail
address.
Public Inspection: All public
comments are available on the agency’s
Web site at https://www.ncua.gov/
Resources/RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
FinalRegulations.aspx as submitted,
except as may not be possible for
technical reasons. Public comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information. Paper copies of
comments may be inspected in NCUA’s
law library at 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314, by
appointment weekdays between 9 a.m.
and 3 p.m. To make an appointment,
call (703) 518–6546 or send an e-mail to
OGCMail@ncua.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Lussier, Staff Attorney,
Office of General Counsel, at the address
above or telephone (703) 518–6540.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23DER1.SGM
23DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80677-80678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32130]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133-AD75
The Low-Income Definition
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending the definition of ``low-income members'' to
clarify that, in determining if a credit union qualifies for a low-
income designation, the comparison of credit union data, whether
individual or family income data, must be with statistical data for the
same category. The amendment will clarify the intention of the original
regulatory text so it is consistent with the geo-coding software the
agency uses to make the low-income credit union (LICU) designation.
DATES: Effective December 23, 2010 this rule finalizes without change,
the interim final rule published on August 5, 2010, 75 FR 47171 (Aug.
5, 2010). That interim rule was effective upon publication on August 5,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Metz, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, or telephone: (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Credit Union Act (Act) authorizes the NCUA Board
(Board) to define ``low-income members'' so that credit unions with a
membership consisting of predominantly low-income members can benefit
from certain statutory relief and receive assistance from the Community
Development Revolving Loan Fund. 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757a(b)(2)(A),
1757a(c)(2)(B), 1772c-1. This authority has been implemented in Sec.
701.34 of NCUA regulations, known as the low-income rule. 12 CFR
701.34. In April 2008, the Board proposed substantial changes to the
rule, which had previously been based on measuring median household
income, with geographic differentials for certain areas with higher
costs of living. 73 FR 22836 (April 28, 2008). In brief, the Board
proposed to, and as adopted in the final rule, did replace median
household income with median family income or median earnings for
individuals as better measures, more flexible, and in line with
standards used by other Federal agencies. 73 FR 71909 (Nov. 26, 2008).
As discussed in the preamble to the final rule, NCUA also undertook
as part of the regulatory changes to facilitate the low-income
designation process by eliminating the requirement for credit unions to
apply for the designation. NCUA is in the process of implementing geo-
coding software to make the calculation automatically for credit unions
during the examination process.
NCUA will make the determination of whether a majority of an
FCU's members are low-income based on data it obtains during the
examination process. This will involve linking member address
information to publicly available information from the U.S. Census
Bureau to estimate member earnings. Using automated, geo-coding
software, NCUA will use member street addresses collected during FCU
examinations to determine the geographic area and metropolitan area
for each member account. NCUA will then use income information for
the geographic area from the Census Bureau and assign estimated
earnings to each member.
73 FR at 71910-11. NCUA's software ensures that the same categories of
data available for member income at a particular credit union are
compared with like categories of statistical data on income from the
Census Bureau. In particular, individual member earnings information is
compared to median individual earnings data and family income
information is compared to median family income data.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NCUA's geo-coding software, known within the agency as the
``Low-Income Designation Assessment Tool,'' is currently a stand-
alone software program developed by NCUA's Office of the Chief
Information Officer with guidance from regional staff experienced in
low-income designation. Regional staff as well as Economic
Development Specialists currently use the tool as needed based on
requests from credit unions. Eventually, the same software rules
will be embedded into the NCUA AIRES examination software. The
current version performs 30 different ratio calculations for each
member based on a variety of factors and data to determine whether
the member meets the low-income definition. The variety of ratios is
expansive in order to provide all of the possible options for
members to meet the definition. Factors recognize the following: (1)
Data sources include both decennial income data as well as American
Community Survey income data; (2) different data is incorporated for
metro vs. non-metro geographic areas; and (3) ratio options include
comparisons of census tract and block group income data, to zip
code, county, MSA, state, and national data, plus comparisons of
county income data to CBSA, state, and national income data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule in November 2008 also provided credit unions, as an
alternative to relying on NCUA's geo-coding software, the option of
providing actual income information about their members as a basis for
qualifying as a LICU. Confusion has arisen regarding the appropriate
comparison of actual member information and statistical data from the
Census Bureau, prompting the need for this clarifying amendment. The
confusion arises from a discussion in the preamble to the final rule,
where the Board stated:
The rule also provides an alternative basis for an FCU to
qualify for a LICU designation. An FCU may be able to demonstrate
the actual income of its members based on data it has, for example,
from loan applications or surveys of its members. An FCU may qualify
as a LICU if it can establish a majority of its members meet the
low-income formula. For example, an FCU with 1,000 members may be
able to show the actual income of 501 or more of its members is
equal to or less than 80% of the MFI for the metropolitan area(s)
where they live. As a practical matter, the Board thinks few FCUs
will need this option because NCUA's approach of matching member
residential information with Census Bureau income information will
provide an estimate very close to members' actual income.
73 FR at 71911. The rule provides median family income or median
individual earnings as alternatives and, as noted above, NCUA's geo-
coding software compares like categories of data. Unfortunately, the
above-quoted statement in the preamble indicated that, as an
alternative to relying on the NCUA's geo-coding, a credit union could
apply for a low-income designation relying on a comparison of actual
income data for individual members to statistical data on median family
income as the basis for the designation. This would not be a valid or
meaningful comparison. The Board believes that, as a matter of logic
and statistical reasoning, only like categories of data may be compared
in making the determination that a credit union's membership meets the
low-income definition. Actual individual member income information
should not be measured against median family income, but rather,
against individual median earnings.
Interim Final Rule and Comments
In July 2010, the Board issued an interim final rule amending Sec.
701.34(a)(1) by clarifying that median family income and median
earnings for individuals are alternative bases on which credit union
members may qualify as low income. 75 FR 47171 (Aug. 5, 2010). In
addition, the interim final rule amended the subsection of the rule
regarding the option for credit unions to submit their own information
[[Page 80678]]
for purposes of qualifying for the designation to clarify that actual
member data must be compared with a like category of statistical data.
NCUA received three comment letters: One from a federal credit
union and two from credit union trade associations. All three
commenters supported the clarification in the interim final rule. The
two trade associations, commenting on an issue outside the scope of the
interim final rule, urged the NCUA to consider further amendment of the
low-income rule to permit credit unions that do not qualify under
NCUA's geo-coding software to use a statistically valid, random sample
of member income data to support a designation as a low-income credit
union. Concurrent with issuing this final rule, the Board is separately
issuing a proposed rule addressing the use of a statistically valid,
random sample to support the low-income designation.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact any regulation may have on
a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a). For purposes
of this analysis, NCUA considers credit unions having under $10 million
in assets small entities. Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 03-
2, 68 FR 31949 (May 29, 2003). As of December 31, 2007, out of
approximately 8,410 federally insured credit unions, 3,599 had less
than $10 million in assets. This interim final rule merely clarifies
the existing low-income rule and, therefore, an analysis is not
required. NCUA, however, provided an analysis when it issued the final
rule in November 2008, concluding that the economic impact on entities
affected by the rule would not be significant. 73 FR 71911-12.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996, Public Law 104-121, provides generally for congressional review
of agency rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in instances
where NCUA issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedures Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this final rule is not a
major rule for purposes of SBREFA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This clarifying amendment does not change the collection
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. The final rule will not have substantial
direct effect on the states, on the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined this final rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Federal credit unions, Low income, Nonmember
deposits, Secondary capital, Shares.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board, on December
16, 2010.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons stated above, NCUA amends 12 CFR part 701 as follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 12 CFR part 701 which was
published at 75 FR 47171 on August 5, 2010, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
[FR Doc. 2010-32130 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P