Revision of Delegation of Authority, 79949-79950 [2010-31942]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
national security and intelligence activities;
and protection of the President of the U.S. or
other individuals pursuant to Section 3056
and 3056A of Title 18. The DHS/ALL—031
ISE SAR Initiative System of Records
contains information that is collected by, on
behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation
with DHS, its components, as well as other
federal, state, local, tribal, or foreign agencies
or private sector organization and may
contain personally identifiable information
collected by other federal, state, local, tribal,
foreign, or international government
agencies. The Secretary of Homeland
Security has exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act,
subject to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) and (4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), and
(e)(12); (f); (g)(1); and (h) of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Additionally,
the Secretary of Homeland Security has
exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the
limitation set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f) of
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2) and (k)(3). Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a caseby-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (c)(4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records could permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:26 Dec 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (e)(12) (Computer
Matching) if the agency is a recipient agency
or a source agency in a matching program
with a non-Federal agency, with respect to
any establishment or revision of a matching
program, at least 30 days prior to conducting
such program, publish in the Federal
Register notice of such establishment or
revision.
(j) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
(k) From subsection (h) (Legal Guardians)
the parent of any minor, or the legal guardian
of any individual who has been declared to
be incompetent due to physical or mental
incapacity or age by a court of competent
jurisdiction, may act on behalf of the
individual.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
79949
Dated: December 9, 2010.
Mary Ellen Callahan
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010–32000 Filed 12–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 2
RIN 0503–AA43
Revision of Delegation of Authority
Office of the Secretary, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document amends the
delegation of authority from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s Under
Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory
Programs (MRP) to the Deputy Under
Secretary for MRP to establish the order
in which a Deputy Under Secretary may
perform the duties and exercise the
powers of the Under Secretary during
the absence or unavailability of the
Under Secretary when there is more
than one Deputy Under Secretary.
DATES: Effective Date: December 21,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Karen Grillo, Chief of Staff, Marketing
and Regulatory Programs, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250; 202–7204–256.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 7 CFR 2.77, the Under Secretary for
Marketing and Regulatory Programs
(MRP) has delegated to the Deputy
Under Secretary for MRP the following
authority, to be exercised only during
the absence or unavailability of the
Under Secretary: Perform all the duties
and exercise all the powers which are
now or which may hereafter be
delegated to the Under Secretary. This
final rule amends 7 CFR 2.77 to
establish the order in which a Deputy
Under Secretary may exercise that
delegation when the MRP mission area
has more than one Deputy Under
Secretary. The authority shall be
exercised by the respective Deputy
Under Secretary in the order in which
he or she has taken office as the Deputy
Under Secretary.
This rule relates to internal agency
management. Therefore, this rule is
exempt from the provisions of Executive
Orders 12866 and 12988. Moreover,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, notice of
proposed rulemaking and opportunity
for comment are not required for this
rule, and it may be made effective less
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
79950
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. In addition, under 5
U.S.C. 804, this rule is not subject to
congressional review under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
121. Finally, this action is not a rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and thus is
exempt from the provisions of that Act.
Authority delegations (Government
agencies).
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 2 is amended
as follows:
PART 2—DELEGATIONS OF
AUTHORITY BY THE SECRETARY OF
AGRICULTURE AND GENERAL
OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT
1. The authority for part 2 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6912(a)(1); 5 U.S.C.
301; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1953, 3
CFR 1949–1953 Comp., p. 1024.
Subpart N—Delegations of Authority
by the Under Secretary for Marketing
and Regulatory Programs
2. Section 2.77 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 2.77 Deputy Under Secretary for
Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Pursuant to § 2.22(a), subject to
reservations in § 2.22(b), and subject to
policy guidance and direction by the
Under Secretary, the following
delegation of authority is made by the
Under Secretary for Marketing and
Regulatory Programs to the Deputy
Under Secretary for Marketing and
Regulatory Programs, to be exercised
only during the absence or
unavailability of the Under Secretary:
Perform all the duties and exercise all
the powers which are now or which
may hereafter be delegated to the Under
Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory
Programs: Provided, that this authority
shall be exercised by the respective
Deputy Under Secretary in the order in
which he or she has taken office as a
Deputy Under Secretary.
Dated: December 2, 2010.
Edward Avalos,
Under Secretary, Marketing and Regulatory
Programs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:26 Dec 20, 2010
Jkt 223001
Federal Aviation Administration
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, 2601 Meacham Boulevard,
Fort Worth, TX 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Faust, Aerospace Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, 12 New England Executive Park;
telephone: (781) 238–7763; fax: (781)
238–7170; e-mail:
nicholas.faust@faa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1253; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–084–AD; Amendment
39–16550; AD 2010–26–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
■
BILLING CODE 3410–90–P
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; Kaman
Aerospace Corporation (Kaman) Model
K–1200 Helicopters
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 2
[FR Doc. 2010–31942 Filed 12–20–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
Kaman Model K–1200 helicopters. This
AD requires revising the Limitations
section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA) by establishing a
life limit of 8,000 hours time-in-service
(TIS) for each main rotor blade (blade)
set. Also, this AD requires removing
each blade set from service if it has
accumulated 8,000 or more hours timein-service (TIS). This AD also requires
replacing certain blade sets with
airworthy blade sets at specified
intervals based on the blade set serial
number (S/N). This AD was prompted
by an accident and the subsequent
discovery of cracks in multiple blade
spars. We are issuing this AD to prevent
blade failure and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD is effective on January
5, 2011.
We must receive comments on this
AD by February 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Kaman Aerospace
Corporation, K-max Product Support
Center, Building 33, P.O. Box 2, 1332
Blue Hills Avenue, Bloomfield, CT
06002, telephone (860) 242–4461.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We are adopting a new AD for the
Kaman Model K–1200 helicopters that
requires revising the Airworthiness
Limitations section of the ICA by
establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours
TIS for each blade set. Previously, these
blades sets did not have an established
retirement life but had specified
overhaul intervals. This AD also
requires removing each blade set with
8,000 or more hours TIS from service.
Also, this AD requires replacing certain
blade sets with airworthy blade sets at
specified intervals based on the blade
set S/N. This AD was prompted by an
accident and the subsequent discovery
of cracks in multiple blade spars. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in a cracked spar, failure of a blade, and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Kaman Service Bulletin
No. 131, Rotor Blade Service Life
Reduction, dated August 11, 2010 (SB).
The SB specifies establishing ‘‘a service
life of K–1200 rotor blade spar
bondment (K911004) to 8,000 hours
time since new (TSN)’’ and removing all
blade sets with over 8,000 hours TIS.
FAA’s Determination
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other helicopters of this
same type design.
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79949-79950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31942]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 2
RIN 0503-AA43
Revision of Delegation of Authority
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the delegation of authority from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture's Under Secretary for Marketing and
Regulatory Programs (MRP) to the Deputy Under Secretary for MRP to
establish the order in which a Deputy Under Secretary may perform the
duties and exercise the powers of the Under Secretary during the
absence or unavailability of the Under Secretary when there is more
than one Deputy Under Secretary.
DATES: Effective Date: December 21, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Grillo, Chief of Staff,
Marketing and Regulatory Programs, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250; 202-7204-256.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 7 CFR 2.77, the Under Secretary
for Marketing and Regulatory Programs (MRP) has delegated to the Deputy
Under Secretary for MRP the following authority, to be exercised only
during the absence or unavailability of the Under Secretary: Perform
all the duties and exercise all the powers which are now or which may
hereafter be delegated to the Under Secretary. This final rule amends 7
CFR 2.77 to establish the order in which a Deputy Under Secretary may
exercise that delegation when the MRP mission area has more than one
Deputy Under Secretary. The authority shall be exercised by the
respective Deputy Under Secretary in the order in which he or she has
taken office as the Deputy Under Secretary.
This rule relates to internal agency management. Therefore, this
rule is exempt from the provisions of Executive Orders 12866 and 12988.
Moreover, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, notice of proposed rulemaking and
opportunity for comment are not required for this rule, and it may be
made effective less
[[Page 79950]]
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. In addition,
under 5 U.S.C. 804, this rule is not subject to congressional review
under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Public Law 104-121. Finally, this action is not a rule as defined by 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and thus is exempt
from the provisions of that Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 2
Authority delegations (Government agencies).
0
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 2 is amended as follows:
PART 2--DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY BY THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
AND GENERAL OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT
0
1. The authority for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6912(a)(1); 5 U.S.C. 301; Reorganization
Plan No. 2 of 1953, 3 CFR 1949-1953 Comp., p. 1024.
Subpart N--Delegations of Authority by the Under Secretary for
Marketing and Regulatory Programs
0
2. Section 2.77 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 2.77 Deputy Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory
Programs.
Pursuant to Sec. 2.22(a), subject to reservations in Sec.
2.22(b), and subject to policy guidance and direction by the Under
Secretary, the following delegation of authority is made by the Under
Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs to the Deputy Under
Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs, to be exercised only
during the absence or unavailability of the Under Secretary: Perform
all the duties and exercise all the powers which are now or which may
hereafter be delegated to the Under Secretary for Marketing and
Regulatory Programs: Provided, that this authority shall be exercised
by the respective Deputy Under Secretary in the order in which he or
she has taken office as a Deputy Under Secretary.
Dated: December 2, 2010.
Edward Avalos,
Under Secretary, Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-31942 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-90-P
