Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants, Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator (HMIWI) Units, Negative Declaration and Withdrawal of EPA Plan Approval, 78916-78918 [2010-31741]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
78916
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
appear to harmonize clearly with
Federal law. As discussed in more detail
below, this final rule is intended to
remedy those shortcomings, as well as
make certain minor editorial revisions
to the COPP regulations set forth in 39
CFR 232.1.
1. Paragraph (f) Gambling: The
prohibition of lottery ticket sales
contains an exception for RandolphSheppard vendors. This exception is
amended to replace obsolete citations to
Postal Service regulations with the
statutory basis for the exception
contained in the Randolph-Sheppard
Act Amendments of 1974. Subsection
(a)(5) of 20 U.S.C. 107a requires that
blind vendors licensed to conduct
vending operations on federal property
be permitted to sell tickets ‘‘for any
lottery authorized by State law and
conducted by an agency of a State’’. This
amendment harmonizes Postal Service
regulations with the RandolphSheppard Act by citing 20 U.S.C. 107a
(a)(5) as the statutory basis for the
exception.
2. Paragraph (m) Nondiscrimination:
The nondiscrimination provision is
amended to remove inappropriate
references to employment policy. The
Postal Service has determined that
facilities regulations governing public
access to and use of Postal Service
property are not the appropriate venue
for articulating employment policy. This
amendment is necessary to eliminate
potential conflict or redundancy with
regard to employment regulations, and
to correct the scope of the
nondiscrimination provision of the
COPP regulations, which governs the
use of Postal Service facilities ‘‘of a
public nature’’.
3. Paragraph (o) Depositing Literature:
The exception to the prohibition against
depositing literature for posting of
notices by U.S. Government-related
organizations is amended to correct an
outdated citation to title 36 of the
United States Code. This amendment is
necessary for consistency with title 36,
which was revised in 1998 without
substantive change (Pub. L. 105–225,
section 501, 112 Stat. 1253). The
amended regulation updates the
statutory definition for U.S.
Government-related organizations such
as the Inaugural Committee, which is
currently defined in 36 U.S.C. 501.
4. Paragraph (p) Penalties and other
law: The penalty provision is amended
to incorporate the procedures for a
sentence of a fine under title 18 of the
United States Code. This amendment is
necessary for consistency with title 18,
which authorizes the Postal Service to
promulgate regulations for the
administration and protection of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
property under its charge and control
and of any persons on such property. 18
U.S.C. 3061. The Postal Accountability
and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109–435,
section 1001, 120 Stat. 3198) contains a
penalty provision for violations of such
regulations, codified at 18 U.S.C.
3061(c). This penalty provision provides
that ‘‘a person violating a regulation
prescribed under this subsection
[authorizing Postal Service
promulgation of regulations for the
protection of its property and persons
on such property] shall be fined under
[title 18].’’ 18 U.S.C. 3061(c)(4)(B). Title
18 sets forth procedures for sentences of
a fine for defendants found guilty of a
criminal offense. 18 U.S.C. 3571. This
amendment harmonizes Postal Service
regulations with the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act by
citing 18 U.S.C. 3571 as the statutory
basis for the penalty provision of the
regulations.
public nature, including all services,
privileges, accommodations, and
activities provided on postal property.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) * * *
(3) Posting of notices by U.S.
Government-related organizations, such
as the Inaugural Committee as defined
in 36 U.S.C. 501.
(p) * * *
(2) Whoever shall be found guilty of
violating the rules and regulations in
this section while on property under the
charge and control of the Postal Service
is subject to a fine as provided in 18
U.S.C. 3571 or imprisonment of not
more than 30 days, or both. Nothing
contained in these rules and regulations
shall be construed to abrogate any other
Federal laws or regulations or any State
and local laws and regulations
applicable to any area in which the
property is situated.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 232
Authority designations (Government
agencies), Crime, Federal buildings and
facilities, Government property, Law
enforcement officers, Postal Service,
Security measures.
■ In view of the considerations
discussed above, the Postal Service
adopts the following amendments to 39
CFR Part 232:
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
PART 232—[Amended]
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0859; FRL -9240–2]
1. The authority citation for Part 232
is revised to read as follows:
2. In § 232.1, paragraphs (f), (m),
(o)(3), and (p)(2) are revised to read as
follows:
Approval and Promulgation of State
Air Quality Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants,
Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of
Emissions From Existing Hospital/
Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator
(HMIWI) Units, Negative Declaration
and Withdrawal of EPA Plan Approval
§ 232.1
AGENCY:
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 13, 3061, 3571; 21
U.S.C. 802, 844; 39 U.S.C. 401, 403(b)(3),
404(a)(7), 1201(2).
■
Conduct on postal property.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Gambling. Participating in games
for money or other personal property,
the operation of gambling devices, the
conduct of a lottery or pool, or the
selling or purchasing of lottery tickets,
is prohibited on postal premises. In
accordance with 20 U.S.C. 107a(a)(5),
this prohibition does not apply to the
vending or exchange of State Lottery
tickets at vending facilities operated by
licensed blind persons where such
lotteries are authorized by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Nondiscrimination. There must be
no discrimination by segregation or
otherwise against any person or persons
because of race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, or disability, in furnishing,
or by refusing to furnish to such person
or persons the use of any facility of a
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2010–31775 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the Commonwealth of
Virginia’s negative declaration and
request for EPA withdrawal of its
section 111(d)/129 plan (the plan)
approval for HMIWI units.
DATES: This rule is effective February
15, 2011 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by January 18, 2011. If EPA receives
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2010–0859 by one of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: E-mail:
wilkie.walter@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0859,
Walter K. Wilkie, Associate Director, Air
Protection Division, Office of Air
Monitoring and Analysis, Mailcode
3AP40, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–
0859. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘Aanonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James B. Topsale, P.E., at (215) 814–
2190, or by e-mail at
topsale.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commonwealth of Virginia
HMIWI plan and related State rule were
approved by EPA in the September 10,
2004 edition of the Federal Register and
codified in 40 CFR Part 62, subpart VV.
(69 FR 54756). An EPA correction
notice, relating to the original notice
SUMMARY, was published in the
November 16, 2005 edition of the
Federal Register. Since that time, all
three designated incinerator facilities in
the plan inventory have been
dismantled, according to the
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department
of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). On
October 6, 2009, EPA promulgated
revised HMIWI emission guidelines
under 40 CFR Part 60, subpart Ce, that
triggered the need for revised State
plans. As a result, on September 13,
2010, the VADEQ requested EPA’s
approval of its negative declaration and
plan withdrawal request. The submitted
negative declaration contains the name
of each designated facility that
permanently shutdown, and the year it
was dismantled.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the Commonwealth
of Virginia’s negative declaration and
request for EPA withdrawal of its plan
approval for HMIWI units. VADEQ has
determined that there are now no
designated facilities, subject to subpart
Ce requirements, in its air pollution
control jurisdiction. EPA accepts that
determination. Accordingly, EPA is
amending part 62 to reflect approval of
the VADEQ September 13, 2010
negative declaration and request for
EPA withdrawal of the HMIWI plan
approval. However, if an affected
Virginia HMIWI unit is discovered in
the future, all the requirements of the
Federal Plan (including revisions or
amendments), part 62, subpart HHH,
will be applicable to the affected unit.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78917
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
State law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have Tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing section 111(d)/129 plan
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this
context, in the absence of a prior
existing requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
78918
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
111(d)/129 plan submission for failure
to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a 111(d)/129 plan
submission, to use VCS in place of a
111(d)/129 plan submission that
otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 15,
2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action approving the
Commonwealth of Virginia section
111(d)/129 negative declaration and
request for EPA withdrawal of the
HMIWI plan approval may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum,
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental
relations, Paper and paper products
industry, Phosphate, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste
treatment and disposal.
Dated: December 2, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR Part 62, Subpart VV, is
amended as follows:
■
PART 62—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. Section 62.11625 is amended by
revising the section heading,
designating the existing paragraph as (a)
and adding paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 62.11625 Identification of plan—negative
declaration.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) On September 13, 2010, the
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department
of Environmental Protection, submitted
a negative declaration, and request for
withdrawal of EPA’s plan approval
under paragraph (a).
■ 3. Section 62.11626 is removed.
■ 4. Section 62.11627 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 62.11627
Effective date.
The effective date of the negative
declaration and EPA withdrawal of the
plan approval is February 15, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2010–31741 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 261, 268, and 302
[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2009–0310, FRL–9239–8]
RIN 2050–AG55
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Removal of
Saccharin and Its Salts From the Lists
of Hazardous Constituents, Hazardous
Wastes, and Hazardous Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final Rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
amending its regulations under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) to remove saccharin and its
salts from the lists of hazardous
constituents and commercial chemical
products which are hazardous wastes
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
when discarded or intended to be
discarded. EPA is also amending the
regulations under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) to remove saccharin and its
salts from the list of hazardous
substances. This final rule is in response
to a petition submitted to EPA by the
Calorie Control Council (CCC) to remove
saccharin and its salts from the above
lists. EPA is granting CCC’s petition
based on a review of the evaluations
conducted by key public health agencies
concerning the carcinogenic and other
potential toxicological effects of
saccharin and its salts, as well as EPA’s
own assessment of the waste generation
and management information for
saccharin and its salts. This review/
assessment demonstrates that saccharin
and its salts do not meet the criteria in
the hazardous waste regulations for
remaining on EPA’s lists of hazardous
constituents, hazardous wastes, and
hazardous substances.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–RCRA–2009–0310. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Certain material, such as copyrighted
material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the OSWER Docket in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. The Public
Meeting Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the OSWER Docket and the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information, review our Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/
hazwaste. For information on specific
aspects of the rule, contact Narendra
Chaudhari of the Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery (5304P),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: 703–308–0454; e-mail address:
chaudhari.narendra@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Who is potentially affected by this
final rule?
This final rule could directly affect
businesses that generate or manage
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78916-78918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31741]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0859; FRL -9240-2]
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants, Commonwealth of Virginia; Control
of Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerator (HMIWI) Units, Negative Declaration and Withdrawal of EPA
Plan Approval
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve the Commonwealth
of Virginia's negative declaration and request for EPA withdrawal of
its section 111(d)/129 plan (the plan) approval for HMIWI units.
DATES: This rule is effective February 15, 2011 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by January 18, 2011. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2010-0859 by one of the following methods:
[[Page 78917]]
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: E-mail: wilkie.walter@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0859, Walter K. Wilkie, Associate
Director, Air Protection Division, Office of Air Monitoring and
Analysis, Mailcode 3AP40, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2010-0859. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``Aanonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale, P.E., at (215) 814-
2190, or by e-mail at topsale.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commonwealth of Virginia HMIWI plan and related State rule were
approved by EPA in the September 10, 2004 edition of the Federal
Register and codified in 40 CFR Part 62, subpart VV. (69 FR 54756). An
EPA correction notice, relating to the original notice SUMMARY, was
published in the November 16, 2005 edition of the Federal Register.
Since that time, all three designated incinerator facilities in the
plan inventory have been dismantled, according to the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). On October 6,
2009, EPA promulgated revised HMIWI emission guidelines under 40 CFR
Part 60, subpart Ce, that triggered the need for revised State plans.
As a result, on September 13, 2010, the VADEQ requested EPA's approval
of its negative declaration and plan withdrawal request. The submitted
negative declaration contains the name of each designated facility that
permanently shutdown, and the year it was dismantled.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the Commonwealth of Virginia's negative
declaration and request for EPA withdrawal of its plan approval for
HMIWI units. VADEQ has determined that there are now no designated
facilities, subject to subpart Ce requirements, in its air pollution
control jurisdiction. EPA accepts that determination. Accordingly, EPA
is amending part 62 to reflect approval of the VADEQ September 13, 2010
negative declaration and request for EPA withdrawal of the HMIWI plan
approval. However, if an affected Virginia HMIWI unit is discovered in
the future, all the requirements of the Federal Plan (including
revisions or amendments), part 62, subpart HHH, will be applicable to
the affected unit.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have Tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it approves a State rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing section 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to
approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
[[Page 78918]]
EPA has no authority to disapprove a 111(d)/129 plan submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when it reviews a 111(d)/129 plan submission, to use VCS in
place of a 111(d)/129 plan submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 15, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action approving the Commonwealth of Virginia
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration and request for EPA withdrawal
of the HMIWI plan approval may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride,
Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products industry,
Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Sulfur acid plants, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: December 2, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR Part 62, Subpart VV, is amended as follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. Section 62.11625 is amended by revising the section heading,
designating the existing paragraph as (a) and adding paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 62.11625 Identification of plan--negative declaration.
* * * * *
(b) On September 13, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department
of Environmental Protection, submitted a negative declaration, and
request for withdrawal of EPA's plan approval under paragraph (a).
0
3. Section 62.11626 is removed.
0
4. Section 62.11627 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 62.11627 Effective date.
The effective date of the negative declaration and EPA withdrawal
of the plan approval is February 15, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2010-31741 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P