Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States and Notice of Public Meetings, 78980-78984 [2010-31725]

Download as PDF 78980 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require authorization under section 202(e) of the FPA (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)). On November 5, 2003, DOE issued Order No. EA–280, which authorized DEMI to transmit electric energy from the United States to Canada for a twoyear term as a power marketer using existing international transmission facilities. DOE renewed the DEMI export authorization in Order No. EA–280–A on March 17, 2006. Order No. EA–280– A expired on November 5, 2010. On November 5, 2010, DEMI filed an application with DOE for renewal of the export authority contained in Order No. Issued in Washington, DC, on December EA–280–A for an additional ten-year 13, 2010. term. Anthony J. Como, DEMI has requested expedited Director, Permitting and Siting Office of treatment of their application. DEMI Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. states that due to recent personnel [FR Doc. 2010–31745 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] changes, the impending termination of BILLING CODE 6450–01–P their current export authorization was only recently discovered. Because that authorization has expired, DEMI wishes DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY to have expedited treatment of this application in order to minimize the [OE Docket No. EA–280–B] disruption to its electricity trade with Canadian interests. DEMI also indicated Application to Export Electric Energy; that it has not engaged in the export of Direct Energy Marketing, Inc. electricity since its authorization AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery expired and will not do so unless and and Energy Reliability, DOE. until DEMI receives an Order granting ACTION: Notice of Application. renewal of its export authority in this proceeding. In response to DEMI’s SUMMARY: Direct Energy Marketing, Inc. request for expedited treatment, DOE (DEMI) has applied to renew its has shortened the public comment authority to transmit electric energy period to 15 days. from the United States to Canada The electric energy that DEMI pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal proposes to export to Canada would be Power Act (FPA). surplus energy purchased from electric utilities, Federal power marketing DATES: Comments, protests, or requests agencies, and other entities within the to intervene must be submitted to DOE United States. The existing international and received on or before January 3, transmission facilities to be utilized by 2011. DEMI have previously been authorized ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or by Presidential permits issued pursuant requests to intervene should be to Executive Order 10485, as amended, addressed to: Christopher Lawrence, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy and are appropriate for open access transmission by third parties. Reliability, Mail Code: OE–20, U.S. Procedural Matters: Any person Department of Energy, 1000 desiring to become a party to these Independence Avenue, SW., proceedings or to be heard by filing Washington, DC 20585–0350. Because comments or protests to this application of delays in handling conventional mail, should file a petition to intervene, it is recommended that documents be comment, or protest at the address transmitted by overnight mail, by provided above in accordance with electronic mail to §§ 385.211 or 385.214 of the Federal Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules facsimile to 202–586–8008. of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 385.211, 385.214). Fifteen copies of each Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) petition and protest should be filed with 202–586–5260. and received by DOE on or before the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of date listed above. Comments on the DEMI application to electricity from the United States to a export electric energy to Canada should foreign country are regulated by the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to be clearly marked with Docket No. EA– 280–B. Additional copies are to be filed sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES evaluated pursuant to DOE’s National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) and after a determination is made by DOE that the proposed action will not adversely impact on the reliability of the U.S. electric power supply system. Copies of this application will be made available, upon request, for public inspection and copying at the address provided above, by accessing the program Web site at https:// www.oe.energy.gov/ permits_pending.htm, or by e-mailing Odessa Hopkins at Odessa.Hopkins@hq.doe.gov. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Dec 16, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 directly with Judith Kim, FERC Attorney, Direct Energy, LP, 12 Greenway Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77046 and Katherine Krause, Director, U.S. Compliance, Direct Energy, LP, 12 Greenway Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, Texas. A final decision will be made on this application after the environmental impacts have been evaluated pursuant to DOE’s National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) and after a determination is made by DOE that the proposed action will not adversely impact on the reliability of the U.S. electric power supply system. Copies of this application will be made available, upon request, for public inspection and copying at the address provided above, by accessing the program Web site at https:// www.oe.energy.gov/ permits_pending.htm, or by e-mailing Odessa Hopkins at Odessa.Hopkins@hq.doe.gov. Issued in Washington, DC, on December 13, 2010. Anthony J. Como, Director, Permitting and Siting Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. [FR Doc. 2010–31743 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLWO300000.L14300000] Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States and Notice of Public Meetings Bureau of Land Management, Interior; Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Availability. AGENCIES: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Department of Energy (DOE) (the Agencies) as colead agencies announce the availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States (BLM/DES 10–59, DOE/EIS—0403). The BLM and the DOE have prepared this document in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended; the Council on Environmental Quality, the DOE, and the Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations implementing NEPA; and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices To ensure that comments will be considered in the Final Programmatic EIS, the Agencies must receive written comments on the Draft Programmatic EIS within 90 days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings on the Draft Programmatic EIS. The locations of scheduled public meetings are listed in the Supplementary Information section below. The public will also be notified of the dates and times of these meetings at least 15 days in advance via local media, the project Web site, and the DOE NEPA Web site. ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments related to the Draft Programmatic EIS by the following methods: • Web site: Using the online comment form available on the project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. This is the preferred method of commenting. • Mail: Addressed to: Solar Energy Draft Programmatic EIS, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue—EVS/240, Argonne, Illinois 60439. DATES: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information on the Draft Programmatic EIS should be directed to Linda Resseguie, BLM Solar Programmatic EIS Project Manager, BLM Washington Office, by e-mail at linda_resseguie@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202–912–7337; or to Jane Summerson, DOE Solar Programmatic EIS Document Manager, by e-mail at jane.summerson@ee.doe.gov, or by telephone at 202–287–6188. For general information regarding the BLM NEPA process, contact Shannon Stewart, Senior Planning and Environmental Analyst, BLM Washington Office, by email at shannon_stewart@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202–912–7219. For general information regarding the DOE NEPA process, contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC–54, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, by telephone at 202–586–4600, or leave a message at 1–800–472–2756. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft Programmatic EIS, references, and additional information regarding solar energy development are available at the project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. An electronic copy of the Draft Programmatic EIS can be viewed in any BLM State Office public room in the 6state study area and will be available through the BLM Web site at https:// www.blm.gov. A complete, printed copy VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Dec 16, 2010 Jkt 223001 is available for review at the following BLM offices: Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. Caliente Field Office, US Highway 93 Building #1, Caliente, Nevada 89008. California Desert District, 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, California 92553. California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W–1623, Sacramento, California 95825. Cedar City Field Office, 176 East D.L. Sargent Drive, Cedar City, Utah 84721. Lake Havasu Field Office, 2610 Sweetwater Avenue, Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86406. Las Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005. Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial Boulevard, Reno, Nevada 89502. San Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 West Highway 160, Monte Vista, Colorado 81144. Southern Nevada District Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130. Tonopah Field Office, 1553 South Main Street, Tonopah, Nevada 89049. Utah State Office, 440 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The Draft Programmatic EIS is also available on the DOE NEPA Web site at https://nepa.energy.gov. The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings on the Draft Programmatic EIS to provide an overview of the document, respond to questions, and take public comments. The meetings will be announced through local news media, the project Web site (https://solareis.anl.gov), and the DOE NEPA Web site (https:// nepa.energy.gov), at least 15 days in advance. Public meetings are currently planned for the following locations: Alamosa, Colorado; Barstow, California; Caliente, Nevada; Cedar City, Utah; El Centro, California; Goldfield, Nevada; Las Cruces, New Mexico; Las Vegas, Nevada; Ontario, California; Palm Springs, California; Phoenix, Arizona; Salt Lake City, Utah; Tucson, Arizona; Washington, DC. At these meetings, the public will have an opportunity to provide oral and written comments. Oral and written comments from the meetings and additional written comments submitted during the comment period will be considered by the Agencies in preparing the Final Programmatic EIS. Comments submitted after the close of the comment period will be considered to the extent practicable. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78981 Background The BLM is considering taking further actions to facilitate solar energy development in compliance with various orders, mandates, and agency policies. For the BLM, these actions include the evaluation of a new Solar Energy Program applicable to utilityscale solar energy development on BLMadministered lands in 6 southwestern states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah). The DOE is considering taking actions to facilitate solar energy development in compliance with various orders, mandates, and agency policies. For the DOE, these actions include the evaluation of developing new program guidance relevant to DOE-supported solar energy projects. The BLM and the DOE are working jointly as lead Agencies to prepare this Programmatic EIS to evaluate the proposed BLM program and whether to develop the DOE guidance. The Draft Programmatic EIS assesses environmental, social, and economic impacts associated with the development and implementation of agency-specific programs that would facilitate environmentally responsible utility-scale solar energy development in 6 southwestern states. For the purposes of the Programmatic EIS, utility-scale solar technologies considered to be viable for deployment over the next 20 years include 3 concentrating solar power technologies (i.e., parabolic trough, power tower, and dish engine systems), and photovoltaic technologies. Because the Programmatic EIS involves environmental effects over a broad geographic and time horizon, the depth and detail of the impact analysis is general, focusing on major impacts in a qualitative manner. The Programmatic EIS does not assess sitespecific issues associated with any future individual solar energy development projects. Future utilityscale solar energy development decisions will be subject to analysis under NEPA that may tier to the programmatic analysis. BLM-Specific Information The BLM has identified a need to respond in a more efficient and effective manner to the high interest in siting utility-scale solar energy development on public lands and ensure consistent application of measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse impacts of such development. The BLM proposes to develop a new Solar Energy Program to further support utility-scale solar energy development on BLMadministered lands that would be applicable to all pending and future E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 78982 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices solar energy development applications upon execution of the Record of Decision for the Solar Programmatic EIS. The proposed Solar Energy Program has been designed to further the BLM’s ability to meet the requirements for facilitating solar energy development on BLM-administered lands established by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–58) and Secretarial Order 3285A1 issued by the Secretary of the Interior. In particular, the proposed program has been designed to meet the requirements of Order 3285A1 to identify and prioritize solar energy development in locations best suited for such development, called solar energy zones (SEZ). The objectives of the BLM’s proposed Solar Energy Program include: • Facilitating near-term utility-scale solar energy development on public lands; • Minimizing potential negative environmental, social, and economic impacts; • Providing flexibility to consider a variety of solar energy projects (i.e., by location, facility size, or technology); • Optimizing existing transmission infrastructure and corridors; and • Standardizing and streamlining the authorization process for utility-scale solar energy development on BLMadministered lands. The anticipated elements of the BLM’s proposed Solar Energy Program include: • Identification of lands excluded from utility-scale solar energy development in the 6-state study area; • Identification of priority areas within the lands open to solar energy development that are best suited for utility-scale production of solar energy in accordance with the requirements of Secretarial Order 3285A1 (i.e., proposed SEZs); • Establishment of mitigation requirements for solar energy development on public lands to ensure the most environmentally responsible development and delivery of solar energy; and • Amendment of BLM land use plans in the 6-state study area to adopt those elements of the new Solar Energy Program that pertain to land use planning. A reasonably foreseeable development (RFD) scenario was developed as part of the Programmatic EIS to help define the potential magnitude of solar energy development that could occur within the 6-state study area over the next 20 years. On the basis of the RFD scenario, the estimated amount of solar energy generation on BLM-administered lands VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Dec 16, 2010 Jkt 223001 in the study area over the 20-year study period is about 24,000 megawatts, with a corresponding dedicated use of about 214,000 acres of BLM-administered lands. Through the Programmatic EIS, the BLM is evaluating 3 alternatives for managing utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered lands in the 6-state study area. These alternatives include two action alternatives—a solar energy development program alternative and a SEZ program alternative—and a no action alternative. Under the solar energy development program alternative, the BLM would establish a new Solar Energy Program of administration and authorization policies and required design features to replace certain elements of its existing solar energy policies. The lands that would be excluded from solar energy development include BLM-administered lands currently off-limits to solar energy development, including lands prohibited by law, regulation, presidential proclamation, or executive order (e.g., lands in the National Landscape Conservation System), along with lands that (1) have slopes greater than or equal to 5 percent; (2) have solar insolation levels (i.e., a measurement of the amount of sunlight that strikes the earth’s surface) below 6.5 kilowatt-hours per square meter per day; and (3) have known resources, resource uses, or special designations identified in local land use plans that are incompatible with solar energy development. On the basis of these exclusions, approximately 22 million acres of BLM-administered lands would be available for right-ofway (ROW) application under this alternative. As part of the solar energy development program alternative, the BLM would also identify a number of SEZs within the lands available for ROW application. An SEZ is defined by the BLM as an area well suited to utility-scale energy production, with few impediments to facility construction and operation where BLM would prioritize solar energy and associated transmission infrastructure development. Approximately 677,400 acres have been identified as proposed SEZs. The elements of the BLM’s new program under this alternative would be implemented through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state area. Under the SEZ program alternative, the BLM would replace certain elements of its current solar energy policies with a program that would authorize utilityscale solar energy development only in the SEZs. Unlike the solar energy development program alternative, lands PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 outside of SEZs would be excluded from utility-scale solar energy development ROW applications. Under this alternative, about 677,400 acres of BLMadministered lands have been identified as proposed SEZs and would be available for ROW application. Under the SEZ program alternative, the management of solar energy development on BLM-administered lands would be the same as described for the solar energy development program alternative. The BLM would establish comprehensive program administration and authorization policies and design features. The elements of the BLM’s new program under this alternative would be implemented through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state area. Under the no action alternative, solar energy development would continue on BLM-administered lands in accordance with existing solar energy policies. The BLM would not implement a comprehensive Solar Energy Program to provide guidance to BLM field staff, developers, and other stakeholders in the 6-state study area. Specifically, the required program administration and authorization policies as well as design features and land use plan amendments proposed in the 2 action alternatives would not be implemented. Future solar energy projects and land use plan amendments would continue to be evaluated solely on an individual, caseby-case basis. DOE-Specific Information The DOE is required to take actions to meet mandates under Executive Order 13212, ‘‘Actions to Expedite EnergyRelated Projects,’’ published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28357); Executive Order 13514, ‘‘Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance,’’ published in the Federal Register on October 5, 2009 (74 FR 52117); and Section 603 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (Pub. L. 109–58). The DOE’s purpose and need is to satisfy both executive orders and comply with congressional mandates to promote, expedite, and advance the production and transmission of environmentally sound energy resources, including renewable energy resources and, in particular, costcompetitive solar energy systems at the utility scale. Specifically, the DOE proposes to further integrate environmental considerations into its analysis and selection of solar projects that it will support. In the Programmatic EIS, the DOE will build on the BLM’s analysis of potential impacts of utility-scale solar E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices development on the environment for all phases of development to provide a technical basis for the development of guidance. The DOE will consider, as appropriate, the relevance of the analytical results for all lands, not just BLM-administered lands in the six state area. The DOE would use this information to develop guidance for the development of solar energy projects. The DOE’s investment and deployment strategy would incorporate a decisionmaking framework of guidance for early consideration of sound environmental practices and potential mitigation measures for solar energy development. Development of a guidance framework, based on the analyses of the Programmatic EIS, would give the DOE the tools with which to make more informed, environmentally sound decisions at the outset, help to streamline future environmental analysis and documentation for DOEsupported solar projects, and support the DOE’s efforts to comprehensively (1) determine where to make technology and resource investments to minimize the environmental impacts of solar technologies and (2) establish environmental mitigation recommendations for financial assistance recipients to consider in project plans when applying for DOE funding. Through this Programmatic EIS, the DOE is evaluating 2 alternatives: an action alternative and a no action alternative. Under the action alternative, the DOE would develop programmatic guidance to further integrate environmental considerations into its analysis and selection of solar projects that it will support. The DOE would use the information about environmental impacts provided in this Programmatic EIS to appropriately amend its programmatic approaches to facilitate the advancement of solar energy development. Under the no action alternative, the DOE would continue to conduct environmental reviews of DOEfunded solar projects on a case-by-case basis. It would not develop programmatic guidance and explicit environmental guidelines and mitigation recommendations to apply to DOE-funded solar projects. DOE’s Western Area Power Administration (Western) markets and transmits wholesale electrical power through an integrated 17,000-circuit mile, high-voltage transmission system across 15 western states, including parts of the 6-state study area for this Programmatic EIS. Western’s purpose and need for participating in this Programmatic EIS is to identify VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Dec 16, 2010 Jkt 223001 potential transmission impacts and recommend mitigation measures for transmission lines associated with solar energy projects. Western anticipates using the transmission environmental impact and mitigation measures analyses in this Programmatic EIS to streamline its own NEPA documents once specific projects are identified and interconnection requests are filed with Western. With the Programmatic EIS providing the basis for this analysis, interconnection project-specific NEPA documents should be more concise and take less time to prepare, resulting in efficiencies for both Western and the project proponent. Preferred Alternative The solar energy development program alternative is the BLM preferred alternative. The DOE has not yet identified a preferred alternative. Public Participation A notice of intent to prepare this PEIS was published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30908). This notice initiated the first scoping period, which lasted from May 29 to July 15, 2008. During that period, the BLM and the DOE invited the public to provide comments on the scope and objectives of the Programmatic EIS, including identification of issues and alternatives that should be considered in the Programmatic EIS analyses. Public meetings were held at 11 locations across the 6 states. Comments were also collected via the project Web site and by mail. A second scoping period was announced through the ‘‘Notice of Availability of Maps and Additional Public Scoping’’ published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009 (74 FR 31307). This scoping period was initiated to solicit public comments on 24 specific tracts of BLM-administered land proposed to receive in-depth study for solar development in the Programmatic EIS. Specifically, the Agencies solicited comments about environmental issues, existing resource data, and industry interest with respect to the 24 solar energy study areas. Public comments were collected via the project Web site and by mail. Approximately 15,900 individuals, organizations, and government agencies provided comments during the first scoping process, and approximately 300 entities provided comments during the second scoping process. In addition to public scoping, the BLM initiated government-togovernment consultation with 316 Native American Tribes, Chapters, and Bands with a potential interest in solar energy development on BLM- PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78983 administered lands in the 6-state study area. The BLM is also coordinating with and soliciting input from the State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) in each of the 6 states in the study area and from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. In addition, the National Council of SHPOs, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and tribal governments have been invited to consult on the Programmatic EIS and the preparation of a National Programmatic Agreement regarding solar energy development. The Draft Programmatic EIS consists of approximately 11,000 pages in 8 volumes. All readers are encouraged to review the document electronically. The Executive Summary and Reader’s Guide, including a digital versatile disc (DVD) containing the entire document, is available upon request. The document is also available through the project Web site at https://solareis.anl.gov, the BLM Web site at https://www.blm.gov, and the DOE NEPA Web site at https:// nepa.energy.gov. Other Agency Involvement Cooperating Federal agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the Department of Defense; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the National Park Service; the Bureau of Reclamation; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9; and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Pacific Division. Other cooperating agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the Arizona Game and Fish Department; the California Energy Commission and Public Utilities Commission; the Nevada Department of Wildlife, the N–4 Grazing Board; the Utah Public Lands Policy Coordination Office; Clark, Esmeralda, Eureka, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada; Saguache County, Colorado; and Dona Ana County, New Mexico. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1 78984 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, and 43 CFR 1610.2 Michael D. Nedd, Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty Management, Bureau of Land Management. Cathy Zoi, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. [FR Doc. 2010–31725 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–84–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 13876–000] South Run Pumped Storage, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing Applications emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES December 13, 2010. On October 26, 2010, South Run Pumped Storage, LLC, Massachusetts, filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the South Run Pumped Storage Project (South Run Project or project) to be located on South Run, near Norton, Medina and Summit counties, Ohio. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners’ express permission. The proposed project would consist of: (1) An excavated, diked, and asphaltlined 255-acre upper reservoir having a maximum water surface area of about 195 acres and a total volume of 7,805 acre-feet; (2) a 7,760-acre-foot capacity underground lower reservoir, 2,200 feet below ground surface, created by previous limestone mining activities; (3) a diversion channel around the west and south sides of the upper reservoir with sufficient capacity to carry a 100year flood flow of 1,170 cubic feet per second; (4) a 28-foot-diameter, 7,000foot-long, concrete-lined power tunnel located 300 feet below the ground surface that extends from the upper reservoir to two 17.5-foot-diameter, 2,400-foot-long concrete-lined vertical shafts connecting the power tunnel with the underground powerhouse penstocks; (5) six 6-foot-3-inch diameter, 235-foot-long, steel-and concrete-lined penstocks; (6) an VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Dec 16, 2010 Jkt 223001 underground powerhouse containing six 250-megawatt (MW) reversible pumpturbines; (7) an underground transformer gallery; (8) a 3-mile-long, 345-kilovolt overhead transmission line; and (9) appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual generation of the South Run Project would be between 1,300 and 2,000 gigawatt-hours, depending on utilization factors. There are no Federal or state lands associated with the project. Applicant Contact: Daniel R. Irvin, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, Gloucester, MA 01930; phone: (978) 252–7631. FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban; phone: (202) 502–6211. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at https:// www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. More information about this project, including a copy of the application, can be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link of Commission’s Web site at http: //www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P–13876–000) in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–31708 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 13213–001] Lock 14 Hydro Partners; Notice of Intent To File License Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approving Use of the Traditional Licensing Process December 10, 2010. a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process. b. Project No.: 13213–001. c. Dated Filed: October 12, 2010. d. Submitted By: Lock 14 Hydro Partners. e. Name of Project: Kentucky Lock and Dam 14 Project. f. Location: On the Kentucky River, in Lee County, Kentucky. g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 4.6 of the Commission’s regulations. h. Potential Applicant Contact: David Brown Kinloch, Soft Energy Associates, Agent for Lock 14 Hydro Partners, 414 South Wenzel Street, Louisville, KY 40204, (502) 589–0975. i. FERC Contact: Sean Murphy at (202) 502–6145; or e-mail at sean.murphy@ferc.gov. j. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed its request to use the Traditional Licensing Process on October 11, 2010. Lock 14 Hydro Partners provided public notice of its request on November 15, 2010. In a letter dated December 10, 2010, the Director of the Office of Energy Projects approved Lock 14 Hydro Partners’ request to use the Traditional Licensing Process. k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with: (a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency regulations thereunder at 50 CFR, part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries under section 305(b) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c) the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Officer, as required by Section 106, National Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2. l. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed a PreApplication Document (PAD; including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the Commission, pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission’s regulations. m. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in the Public E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78980-78984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWO300000.L14300000]


Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental 
Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern 
States and Notice of Public Meetings

AGENCIES: Bureau of Land Management, Interior; Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Department of 
Energy (DOE) (the Agencies) as co-lead agencies announce the 
availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States (BLM/DES 
10-59, DOE/EIS--0403). The BLM and the DOE have prepared this document 
in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 
1969, as amended; the Council on Environmental Quality, the DOE, and 
the Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations implementing NEPA; and 
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended.

[[Page 78981]]


DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered in the Final 
Programmatic EIS, the Agencies must receive written comments on the 
Draft Programmatic EIS within 90 days following the date the 
Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in 
the Federal Register. The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings 
on the Draft Programmatic EIS. The locations of scheduled public 
meetings are listed in the Supplementary Information section below. The 
public will also be notified of the dates and times of these meetings 
at least 15 days in advance via local media, the project Web site, and 
the DOE NEPA Web site.

ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments related to the Draft 
Programmatic EIS by the following methods:
     Web site: Using the online comment form available on the 
project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. This is the preferred method 
of commenting.
     Mail: Addressed to: Solar Energy Draft Programmatic EIS, 
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue--EVS/240, Argonne, 
Illinois 60439.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information on 
the Draft Programmatic EIS should be directed to Linda Resseguie, BLM 
Solar Programmatic EIS Project Manager, BLM Washington Office, by e-
mail at linda_resseguie@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202-912-7337; or 
to Jane Summerson, DOE Solar Programmatic EIS Document Manager, by e-
mail at jane.summerson@ee.doe.gov, or by telephone at 202-287-6188. For 
general information regarding the BLM NEPA process, contact Shannon 
Stewart, Senior Planning and Environmental Analyst, BLM Washington 
Office, by e-mail at shannon_stewart@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202-
912-7219. For general information regarding the DOE NEPA process, 
contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and 
Compliance, GC-54, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20585, by telephone at 202-586-4600, or leave a 
message at 1-800-472-2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft Programmatic EIS, references, and 
additional information regarding solar energy development are available 
at the project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. An electronic copy of 
the Draft Programmatic EIS can be viewed in any BLM State Office public 
room in the 6-state study area and will be available through the BLM 
Web site at https://www.blm.gov. A complete, printed copy is available 
for review at the following BLM offices:
    Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85004.
    Caliente Field Office, US Highway 93 Building 1, Caliente, 
Nevada 89008.
    California Desert District, 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, 
Moreno Valley, California 92553.
    California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623, 
Sacramento, California 95825.
    Cedar City Field Office, 176 East D.L. Sargent Drive, Cedar City, 
Utah 84721.
    Lake Havasu Field Office, 2610 Sweetwater Avenue, Lake Havasu City, 
Arizona 86406.
    Las Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New 
Mexico 88005.
    Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial Boulevard, Reno, Nevada 89502.
    San Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 West Highway 160, Monte 
Vista, Colorado 81144.
    Southern Nevada District Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las 
Vegas, Nevada 89130.
    Tonopah Field Office, 1553 South Main Street, Tonopah, Nevada 
89049.
    Utah State Office, 440 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84101.
    The Draft Programmatic EIS is also available on the DOE NEPA Web 
site at https://nepa.energy.gov.
    The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings on the Draft 
Programmatic EIS to provide an overview of the document, respond to 
questions, and take public comments. The meetings will be announced 
through local news media, the project Web site (https://solareis.anl.gov), and the DOE NEPA Web site (https://nepa.energy.gov), 
at least 15 days in advance. Public meetings are currently planned for 
the following locations:
    Alamosa, Colorado; Barstow, California; Caliente, Nevada; Cedar 
City, Utah; El Centro, California; Goldfield, Nevada; Las Cruces, New 
Mexico; Las Vegas, Nevada; Ontario, California; Palm Springs, 
California; Phoenix, Arizona; Salt Lake City, Utah; Tucson, Arizona; 
Washington, DC.
    At these meetings, the public will have an opportunity to provide 
oral and written comments. Oral and written comments from the meetings 
and additional written comments submitted during the comment period 
will be considered by the Agencies in preparing the Final Programmatic 
EIS. Comments submitted after the close of the comment period will be 
considered to the extent practicable.

Background

    The BLM is considering taking further actions to facilitate solar 
energy development in compliance with various orders, mandates, and 
agency policies. For the BLM, these actions include the evaluation of a 
new Solar Energy Program applicable to utility-scale solar energy 
development on BLM-administered lands in 6 southwestern states 
(Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah). The DOE 
is considering taking actions to facilitate solar energy development in 
compliance with various orders, mandates, and agency policies. For the 
DOE, these actions include the evaluation of developing new program 
guidance relevant to DOE-supported solar energy projects. The BLM and 
the DOE are working jointly as lead Agencies to prepare this 
Programmatic EIS to evaluate the proposed BLM program and whether to 
develop the DOE guidance. The Draft Programmatic EIS assesses 
environmental, social, and economic impacts associated with the 
development and implementation of agency-specific programs that would 
facilitate environmentally responsible utility-scale solar energy 
development in 6 southwestern states. For the purposes of the 
Programmatic EIS, utility-scale solar technologies considered to be 
viable for deployment over the next 20 years include 3 concentrating 
solar power technologies (i.e., parabolic trough, power tower, and dish 
engine systems), and photovoltaic technologies. Because the 
Programmatic EIS involves environmental effects over a broad geographic 
and time horizon, the depth and detail of the impact analysis is 
general, focusing on major impacts in a qualitative manner. The 
Programmatic EIS does not assess site-specific issues associated with 
any future individual solar energy development projects. Future 
utility-scale solar energy development decisions will be subject to 
analysis under NEPA that may tier to the programmatic analysis.

BLM-Specific Information

    The BLM has identified a need to respond in a more efficient and 
effective manner to the high interest in siting utility-scale solar 
energy development on public lands and ensure consistent application of 
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse impacts of such 
development. The BLM proposes to develop a new Solar Energy Program to 
further support utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-
administered lands that would be applicable to all pending and future

[[Page 78982]]

solar energy development applications upon execution of the Record of 
Decision for the Solar Programmatic EIS.
    The proposed Solar Energy Program has been designed to further the 
BLM's ability to meet the requirements for facilitating solar energy 
development on BLM-administered lands established by the Energy Policy 
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58) and Secretarial Order 3285A1 issued by the 
Secretary of the Interior. In particular, the proposed program has been 
designed to meet the requirements of Order 3285A1 to identify and 
prioritize solar energy development in locations best suited for such 
development, called solar energy zones (SEZ).
    The objectives of the BLM's proposed Solar Energy Program include:
     Facilitating near-term utility-scale solar energy 
development on public lands;
     Minimizing potential negative environmental, social, and 
economic impacts;
     Providing flexibility to consider a variety of solar 
energy projects (i.e., by location, facility size, or technology);
     Optimizing existing transmission infrastructure and 
corridors; and
     Standardizing and streamlining the authorization process 
for utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered lands.
    The anticipated elements of the BLM's proposed Solar Energy Program 
include:
     Identification of lands excluded from utility-scale solar 
energy development in the 6-state study area;
     Identification of priority areas within the lands open to 
solar energy development that are best suited for utility-scale 
production of solar energy in accordance with the requirements of 
Secretarial Order 3285A1 (i.e., proposed SEZs);
     Establishment of mitigation requirements for solar energy 
development on public lands to ensure the most environmentally 
responsible development and delivery of solar energy; and
     Amendment of BLM land use plans in the 6-state study area 
to adopt those elements of the new Solar Energy Program that pertain to 
land use planning.
    A reasonably foreseeable development (RFD) scenario was developed 
as part of the Programmatic EIS to help define the potential magnitude 
of solar energy development that could occur within the 6-state study 
area over the next 20 years. On the basis of the RFD scenario, the 
estimated amount of solar energy generation on BLM-administered lands 
in the study area over the 20-year study period is about 24,000 
megawatts, with a corresponding dedicated use of about 214,000 acres of 
BLM-administered lands.
    Through the Programmatic EIS, the BLM is evaluating 3 alternatives 
for managing utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered 
lands in the 6-state study area. These alternatives include two action 
alternatives--a solar energy development program alternative and a SEZ 
program alternative--and a no action alternative.
    Under the solar energy development program alternative, the BLM 
would establish a new Solar Energy Program of administration and 
authorization policies and required design features to replace certain 
elements of its existing solar energy policies. The lands that would be 
excluded from solar energy development include BLM-administered lands 
currently off-limits to solar energy development, including lands 
prohibited by law, regulation, presidential proclamation, or executive 
order (e.g., lands in the National Landscape Conservation System), 
along with lands that (1) have slopes greater than or equal to 5 
percent; (2) have solar insolation levels (i.e., a measurement of the 
amount of sunlight that strikes the earth's surface) below 6.5 
kilowatt-hours per square meter per day; and (3) have known resources, 
resource uses, or special designations identified in local land use 
plans that are incompatible with solar energy development. On the basis 
of these exclusions, approximately 22 million acres of BLM-administered 
lands would be available for right-of-way (ROW) application under this 
alternative.
    As part of the solar energy development program alternative, the 
BLM would also identify a number of SEZs within the lands available for 
ROW application. An SEZ is defined by the BLM as an area well suited to 
utility-scale energy production, with few impediments to facility 
construction and operation where BLM would prioritize solar energy and 
associated transmission infrastructure development. Approximately 
677,400 acres have been identified as proposed SEZs. The elements of 
the BLM's new program under this alternative would be implemented 
through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state area.
    Under the SEZ program alternative, the BLM would replace certain 
elements of its current solar energy policies with a program that would 
authorize utility-scale solar energy development only in the SEZs. 
Unlike the solar energy development program alternative, lands outside 
of SEZs would be excluded from utility-scale solar energy development 
ROW applications. Under this alternative, about 677,400 acres of BLM-
administered lands have been identified as proposed SEZs and would be 
available for ROW application. Under the SEZ program alternative, the 
management of solar energy development on BLM-administered lands would 
be the same as described for the solar energy development program 
alternative. The BLM would establish comprehensive program 
administration and authorization policies and design features. The 
elements of the BLM's new program under this alternative would be 
implemented through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state 
area.
    Under the no action alternative, solar energy development would 
continue on BLM-administered lands in accordance with existing solar 
energy policies. The BLM would not implement a comprehensive Solar 
Energy Program to provide guidance to BLM field staff, developers, and 
other stakeholders in the 6-state study area. Specifically, the 
required program administration and authorization policies as well as 
design features and land use plan amendments proposed in the 2 action 
alternatives would not be implemented. Future solar energy projects and 
land use plan amendments would continue to be evaluated solely on an 
individual, case-by-case basis.

DOE-Specific Information

    The DOE is required to take actions to meet mandates under 
Executive Order 13212, ``Actions to Expedite Energy-Related Projects,'' 
published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28357); 
Executive Order 13514, ``Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, 
and Economic Performance,'' published in the Federal Register on 
October 5, 2009 (74 FR 52117); and Section 603 of the Energy 
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (Pub. L. 109-58). The 
DOE's purpose and need is to satisfy both executive orders and comply 
with congressional mandates to promote, expedite, and advance the 
production and transmission of environmentally sound energy resources, 
including renewable energy resources and, in particular, cost-
competitive solar energy systems at the utility scale.
    Specifically, the DOE proposes to further integrate environmental 
considerations into its analysis and selection of solar projects that 
it will support. In the Programmatic EIS, the DOE will build on the 
BLM's analysis of potential impacts of utility-scale solar

[[Page 78983]]

development on the environment for all phases of development to provide 
a technical basis for the development of guidance. The DOE will 
consider, as appropriate, the relevance of the analytical results for 
all lands, not just BLM-administered lands in the six state area.
    The DOE would use this information to develop guidance for the 
development of solar energy projects. The DOE's investment and 
deployment strategy would incorporate a decision-making framework of 
guidance for early consideration of sound environmental practices and 
potential mitigation measures for solar energy development. Development 
of a guidance framework, based on the analyses of the Programmatic EIS, 
would give the DOE the tools with which to make more informed, 
environmentally sound decisions at the outset, help to streamline 
future environmental analysis and documentation for DOE-supported solar 
projects, and support the DOE's efforts to comprehensively (1) 
determine where to make technology and resource investments to minimize 
the environmental impacts of solar technologies and (2) establish 
environmental mitigation recommendations for financial assistance 
recipients to consider in project plans when applying for DOE funding.
    Through this Programmatic EIS, the DOE is evaluating 2 
alternatives: an action alternative and a no action alternative. Under 
the action alternative, the DOE would develop programmatic guidance to 
further integrate environmental considerations into its analysis and 
selection of solar projects that it will support. The DOE would use the 
information about environmental impacts provided in this Programmatic 
EIS to appropriately amend its programmatic approaches to facilitate 
the advancement of solar energy development. Under the no action 
alternative, the DOE would continue to conduct environmental reviews of 
DOE-funded solar projects on a case-by-case basis. It would not develop 
programmatic guidance and explicit environmental guidelines and 
mitigation recommendations to apply to DOE-funded solar projects.
    DOE's Western Area Power Administration (Western) markets and 
transmits wholesale electrical power through an integrated 17,000-
circuit mile, high-voltage transmission system across 15 western 
states, including parts of the 6-state study area for this Programmatic 
EIS. Western's purpose and need for participating in this Programmatic 
EIS is to identify potential transmission impacts and recommend 
mitigation measures for transmission lines associated with solar energy 
projects. Western anticipates using the transmission environmental 
impact and mitigation measures analyses in this Programmatic EIS to 
streamline its own NEPA documents once specific projects are identified 
and interconnection requests are filed with Western. With the 
Programmatic EIS providing the basis for this analysis, interconnection 
project-specific NEPA documents should be more concise and take less 
time to prepare, resulting in efficiencies for both Western and the 
project proponent.

Preferred Alternative

    The solar energy development program alternative is the BLM 
preferred alternative. The DOE has not yet identified a preferred 
alternative.

Public Participation

    A notice of intent to prepare this PEIS was published in the 
Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30908). This notice initiated 
the first scoping period, which lasted from May 29 to July 15, 2008. 
During that period, the BLM and the DOE invited the public to provide 
comments on the scope and objectives of the Programmatic EIS, including 
identification of issues and alternatives that should be considered in 
the Programmatic EIS analyses. Public meetings were held at 11 
locations across the 6 states. Comments were also collected via the 
project Web site and by mail. A second scoping period was announced 
through the ``Notice of Availability of Maps and Additional Public 
Scoping'' published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009 (74 FR 
31307). This scoping period was initiated to solicit public comments on 
24 specific tracts of BLM-administered land proposed to receive in-
depth study for solar development in the Programmatic EIS. 
Specifically, the Agencies solicited comments about environmental 
issues, existing resource data, and industry interest with respect to 
the 24 solar energy study areas. Public comments were collected via the 
project Web site and by mail.
    Approximately 15,900 individuals, organizations, and government 
agencies provided comments during the first scoping process, and 
approximately 300 entities provided comments during the second scoping 
process.
    In addition to public scoping, the BLM initiated government-to-
government consultation with 316 Native American Tribes, Chapters, and 
Bands with a potential interest in solar energy development on BLM-
administered lands in the 6-state study area. The BLM is also 
coordinating with and soliciting input from the State Historic 
Preservation Offices (SHPO) in each of the 6 states in the study area 
and from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. In addition, 
the National Council of SHPOs, the National Trust for Historic 
Preservation, and tribal governments have been invited to consult on 
the Programmatic EIS and the preparation of a National Programmatic 
Agreement regarding solar energy development.
    The Draft Programmatic EIS consists of approximately 11,000 pages 
in 8 volumes. All readers are encouraged to review the document 
electronically. The Executive Summary and Reader's Guide, including a 
digital versatile disc (DVD) containing the entire document, is 
available upon request. The document is also available through the 
project Web site at https://solareis.anl.gov, the BLM Web site at https://www.blm.gov, and the DOE NEPA Web site at https://nepa.energy.gov.

Other Agency Involvement

    Cooperating Federal agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the 
Department of Defense; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the National 
Park Service; the Bureau of Reclamation; the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 9; and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 
South Pacific Division.
    Other cooperating agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the 
Arizona Game and Fish Department; the California Energy Commission and 
Public Utilities Commission; the Nevada Department of Wildlife, the N-4 
Grazing Board; the Utah Public Lands Policy Coordination Office; Clark, 
Esmeralda, Eureka, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada; Saguache County, 
Colorado; and Dona Ana County, New Mexico.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.


[[Page 78984]]


    Authority:  40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, and 43 CFR 1610.2

Michael D. Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty Management, Bureau of Land 
Management.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010-31725 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.