Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States and Notice of Public Meetings, 78980-78984 [2010-31725]
Download as PDF
78980
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
Department of Energy Organization Act
(42 U.S.C. 7151(b), 7172(f)) and require
authorization under section 202(e) of
the FPA (16 U.S.C. 824a(e)).
On November 5, 2003, DOE issued
Order No. EA–280, which authorized
DEMI to transmit electric energy from
the United States to Canada for a twoyear term as a power marketer using
existing international transmission
facilities. DOE renewed the DEMI export
authorization in Order No. EA–280–A
on March 17, 2006. Order No. EA–280–
A expired on November 5, 2010. On
November 5, 2010, DEMI filed an
application with DOE for renewal of the
export authority contained in Order No.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
EA–280–A for an additional ten-year
13, 2010.
term.
Anthony J. Como,
DEMI has requested expedited
Director, Permitting and Siting Office of
treatment of their application. DEMI
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
states that due to recent personnel
[FR Doc. 2010–31745 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
changes, the impending termination of
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
their current export authorization was
only recently discovered. Because that
authorization has expired, DEMI wishes
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
to have expedited treatment of this
application in order to minimize the
[OE Docket No. EA–280–B]
disruption to its electricity trade with
Canadian interests. DEMI also indicated
Application to Export Electric Energy;
that it has not engaged in the export of
Direct Energy Marketing, Inc.
electricity since its authorization
AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery
expired and will not do so unless and
and Energy Reliability, DOE.
until DEMI receives an Order granting
ACTION: Notice of Application.
renewal of its export authority in this
proceeding. In response to DEMI’s
SUMMARY: Direct Energy Marketing, Inc.
request for expedited treatment, DOE
(DEMI) has applied to renew its
has shortened the public comment
authority to transmit electric energy
period to 15 days.
from the United States to Canada
The electric energy that DEMI
pursuant to section 202(e) of the Federal proposes to export to Canada would be
Power Act (FPA).
surplus energy purchased from electric
utilities, Federal power marketing
DATES: Comments, protests, or requests
agencies, and other entities within the
to intervene must be submitted to DOE
United States. The existing international
and received on or before January 3,
transmission facilities to be utilized by
2011.
DEMI have previously been authorized
ADDRESSES: Comments, protests or
by Presidential permits issued pursuant
requests to intervene should be
to Executive Order 10485, as amended,
addressed to: Christopher Lawrence,
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy and are appropriate for open access
transmission by third parties.
Reliability, Mail Code: OE–20, U.S.
Procedural Matters: Any person
Department of Energy, 1000
desiring to become a party to these
Independence Avenue, SW.,
proceedings or to be heard by filing
Washington, DC 20585–0350. Because
comments or protests to this application
of delays in handling conventional mail,
should file a petition to intervene,
it is recommended that documents be
comment, or protest at the address
transmitted by overnight mail, by
provided above in accordance with
electronic mail to
§§ 385.211 or 385.214 of the Federal
Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by
Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules
facsimile to 202–586–8008.
of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
385.211, 385.214). Fifteen copies of each
Christopher Lawrence (Program Office)
petition and protest should be filed with
202–586–5260.
and received by DOE on or before the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Exports of
date listed above.
Comments on the DEMI application to
electricity from the United States to a
export electric energy to Canada should
foreign country are regulated by the
Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to be clearly marked with Docket No. EA–
280–B. Additional copies are to be filed
sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
evaluated pursuant to DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) and after
a determination is made by DOE that the
proposed action will not adversely
impact on the reliability of the U.S.
electric power supply system.
Copies of this application will be
made available, upon request, for public
inspection and copying at the address
provided above, by accessing the
program Web site at https://
www.oe.energy.gov/
permits_pending.htm, or by e-mailing
Odessa Hopkins at
Odessa.Hopkins@hq.doe.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
directly with Judith Kim, FERC
Attorney, Direct Energy, LP, 12
Greenway Plaza, Suite 600, Houston,
Texas 77046 and Katherine Krause,
Director, U.S. Compliance, Direct
Energy, LP, 12 Greenway Plaza, Suite
600, Houston, Texas. A final decision
will be made on this application after
the environmental impacts have been
evaluated pursuant to DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021) and after
a determination is made by DOE that the
proposed action will not adversely
impact on the reliability of the U.S.
electric power supply system.
Copies of this application will be
made available, upon request, for public
inspection and copying at the address
provided above, by accessing the
program Web site at https://
www.oe.energy.gov/
permits_pending.htm, or by e-mailing
Odessa Hopkins at
Odessa.Hopkins@hq.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
13, 2010.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Permitting and Siting Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2010–31743 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO300000.L14300000]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for Solar Energy
Development in Six Southwestern
States and Notice of Public Meetings
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior; Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCIES:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) and the Department
of Energy (DOE) (the Agencies) as colead agencies announce the availability
of the Draft Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Solar Energy Development in Six
Southwestern States (BLM/DES 10–59,
DOE/EIS—0403). The BLM and the DOE
have prepared this document in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended; the Council on
Environmental Quality, the DOE, and
the Department of the Interior (DOI)
regulations implementing NEPA; and
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976, as amended.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
To ensure that comments will be
considered in the Final Programmatic
EIS, the Agencies must receive written
comments on the Draft Programmatic
EIS within 90 days following the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register. The BLM and the
DOE will hold 14 public meetings on
the Draft Programmatic EIS. The
locations of scheduled public meetings
are listed in the Supplementary
Information section below. The public
will also be notified of the dates and
times of these meetings at least 15 days
in advance via local media, the project
Web site, and the DOE NEPA Web site.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments related to the Draft
Programmatic EIS by the following
methods:
• Web site: Using the online comment
form available on the project Web site:
https://solareis.anl.gov. This is the
preferred method of commenting.
• Mail: Addressed to: Solar Energy
Draft Programmatic EIS, Argonne
National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass
Avenue—EVS/240, Argonne, Illinois
60439.
DATES:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information on
the Draft Programmatic EIS should be
directed to Linda Resseguie, BLM Solar
Programmatic EIS Project Manager, BLM
Washington Office, by e-mail at
linda_resseguie@blm.gov, or by
telephone at 202–912–7337; or to Jane
Summerson, DOE Solar Programmatic
EIS Document Manager, by e-mail at
jane.summerson@ee.doe.gov, or by
telephone at 202–287–6188. For general
information regarding the BLM NEPA
process, contact Shannon Stewart,
Senior Planning and Environmental
Analyst, BLM Washington Office, by email at shannon_stewart@blm.gov, or by
telephone at 202–912–7219. For general
information regarding the DOE NEPA
process, contact Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC–54, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, by
telephone at 202–586–4600, or leave a
message at 1–800–472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft
Programmatic EIS, references, and
additional information regarding solar
energy development are available at the
project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov.
An electronic copy of the Draft
Programmatic EIS can be viewed in any
BLM State Office public room in the 6state study area and will be available
through the BLM Web site at https://
www.blm.gov. A complete, printed copy
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
is available for review at the following
BLM offices:
Arizona State Office, One North
Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix,
Arizona 85004.
Caliente Field Office, US Highway 93
Building #1, Caliente, Nevada 89008.
California Desert District, 22835 Calle
San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley,
California 92553.
California State Office, 2800 Cottage
Way, Suite W–1623, Sacramento,
California 95825.
Cedar City Field Office, 176 East D.L.
Sargent Drive, Cedar City, Utah 84721.
Lake Havasu Field Office, 2610
Sweetwater Avenue, Lake Havasu City,
Arizona 86406.
Las Cruces District Office, 1800
Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New
Mexico 88005.
Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial
Boulevard, Reno, Nevada 89502.
San Luis Valley Public Lands Center,
1803 West Highway 160, Monte Vista,
Colorado 81144.
Southern Nevada District Office, 4701
North Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, Nevada
89130.
Tonopah Field Office, 1553 South
Main Street, Tonopah, Nevada 89049.
Utah State Office, 440 West 200
South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah
84101.
The Draft Programmatic EIS is also
available on the DOE NEPA Web site at
https://nepa.energy.gov.
The BLM and the DOE will hold 14
public meetings on the Draft
Programmatic EIS to provide an
overview of the document, respond to
questions, and take public comments.
The meetings will be announced
through local news media, the project
Web site (https://solareis.anl.gov), and
the DOE NEPA Web site (https://
nepa.energy.gov), at least 15 days in
advance. Public meetings are currently
planned for the following locations:
Alamosa, Colorado; Barstow,
California; Caliente, Nevada; Cedar City,
Utah; El Centro, California; Goldfield,
Nevada; Las Cruces, New Mexico; Las
Vegas, Nevada; Ontario, California;
Palm Springs, California; Phoenix,
Arizona; Salt Lake City, Utah; Tucson,
Arizona; Washington, DC.
At these meetings, the public will
have an opportunity to provide oral and
written comments. Oral and written
comments from the meetings and
additional written comments submitted
during the comment period will be
considered by the Agencies in preparing
the Final Programmatic EIS. Comments
submitted after the close of the
comment period will be considered to
the extent practicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78981
Background
The BLM is considering taking further
actions to facilitate solar energy
development in compliance with
various orders, mandates, and agency
policies. For the BLM, these actions
include the evaluation of a new Solar
Energy Program applicable to utilityscale solar energy development on BLMadministered lands in 6 southwestern
states (Arizona, California, Colorado,
Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah). The
DOE is considering taking actions to
facilitate solar energy development in
compliance with various orders,
mandates, and agency policies. For the
DOE, these actions include the
evaluation of developing new program
guidance relevant to DOE-supported
solar energy projects. The BLM and the
DOE are working jointly as lead
Agencies to prepare this Programmatic
EIS to evaluate the proposed BLM
program and whether to develop the
DOE guidance. The Draft Programmatic
EIS assesses environmental, social, and
economic impacts associated with the
development and implementation of
agency-specific programs that would
facilitate environmentally responsible
utility-scale solar energy development
in 6 southwestern states. For the
purposes of the Programmatic EIS,
utility-scale solar technologies
considered to be viable for deployment
over the next 20 years include 3
concentrating solar power technologies
(i.e., parabolic trough, power tower, and
dish engine systems), and photovoltaic
technologies. Because the Programmatic
EIS involves environmental effects over
a broad geographic and time horizon,
the depth and detail of the impact
analysis is general, focusing on major
impacts in a qualitative manner. The
Programmatic EIS does not assess sitespecific issues associated with any
future individual solar energy
development projects. Future utilityscale solar energy development
decisions will be subject to analysis
under NEPA that may tier to the
programmatic analysis.
BLM-Specific Information
The BLM has identified a need to
respond in a more efficient and effective
manner to the high interest in siting
utility-scale solar energy development
on public lands and ensure consistent
application of measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate the adverse
impacts of such development. The BLM
proposes to develop a new Solar Energy
Program to further support utility-scale
solar energy development on BLMadministered lands that would be
applicable to all pending and future
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
78982
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
solar energy development applications
upon execution of the Record of
Decision for the Solar Programmatic
EIS.
The proposed Solar Energy Program
has been designed to further the BLM’s
ability to meet the requirements for
facilitating solar energy development on
BLM-administered lands established by
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub. L.
109–58) and Secretarial Order 3285A1
issued by the Secretary of the Interior.
In particular, the proposed program has
been designed to meet the requirements
of Order 3285A1 to identify and
prioritize solar energy development in
locations best suited for such
development, called solar energy zones
(SEZ).
The objectives of the BLM’s proposed
Solar Energy Program include:
• Facilitating near-term utility-scale
solar energy development on public
lands;
• Minimizing potential negative
environmental, social, and economic
impacts;
• Providing flexibility to consider a
variety of solar energy projects (i.e., by
location, facility size, or technology);
• Optimizing existing transmission
infrastructure and corridors; and
• Standardizing and streamlining the
authorization process for utility-scale
solar energy development on BLMadministered lands.
The anticipated elements of the
BLM’s proposed Solar Energy Program
include:
• Identification of lands excluded
from utility-scale solar energy
development in the 6-state study area;
• Identification of priority areas
within the lands open to solar energy
development that are best suited for
utility-scale production of solar energy
in accordance with the requirements of
Secretarial Order 3285A1 (i.e., proposed
SEZs);
• Establishment of mitigation
requirements for solar energy
development on public lands to ensure
the most environmentally responsible
development and delivery of solar
energy; and
• Amendment of BLM land use plans
in the 6-state study area to adopt those
elements of the new Solar Energy
Program that pertain to land use
planning.
A reasonably foreseeable development
(RFD) scenario was developed as part of
the Programmatic EIS to help define the
potential magnitude of solar energy
development that could occur within
the 6-state study area over the next 20
years. On the basis of the RFD scenario,
the estimated amount of solar energy
generation on BLM-administered lands
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
in the study area over the 20-year study
period is about 24,000 megawatts, with
a corresponding dedicated use of about
214,000 acres of BLM-administered
lands.
Through the Programmatic EIS, the
BLM is evaluating 3 alternatives for
managing utility-scale solar energy
development on BLM-administered
lands in the 6-state study area. These
alternatives include two action
alternatives—a solar energy
development program alternative and a
SEZ program alternative—and a no
action alternative.
Under the solar energy development
program alternative, the BLM would
establish a new Solar Energy Program of
administration and authorization
policies and required design features to
replace certain elements of its existing
solar energy policies. The lands that
would be excluded from solar energy
development include BLM-administered
lands currently off-limits to solar energy
development, including lands
prohibited by law, regulation,
presidential proclamation, or executive
order (e.g., lands in the National
Landscape Conservation System), along
with lands that (1) have slopes greater
than or equal to 5 percent; (2) have solar
insolation levels (i.e., a measurement of
the amount of sunlight that strikes the
earth’s surface) below 6.5 kilowatt-hours
per square meter per day; and (3) have
known resources, resource uses, or
special designations identified in local
land use plans that are incompatible
with solar energy development. On the
basis of these exclusions, approximately
22 million acres of BLM-administered
lands would be available for right-ofway (ROW) application under this
alternative.
As part of the solar energy
development program alternative, the
BLM would also identify a number of
SEZs within the lands available for
ROW application. An SEZ is defined by
the BLM as an area well suited to
utility-scale energy production, with
few impediments to facility
construction and operation where BLM
would prioritize solar energy and
associated transmission infrastructure
development. Approximately 677,400
acres have been identified as proposed
SEZs. The elements of the BLM’s new
program under this alternative would be
implemented through amendment of the
land use plans within the 6-state area.
Under the SEZ program alternative,
the BLM would replace certain elements
of its current solar energy policies with
a program that would authorize utilityscale solar energy development only in
the SEZs. Unlike the solar energy
development program alternative, lands
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
outside of SEZs would be excluded from
utility-scale solar energy development
ROW applications. Under this
alternative, about 677,400 acres of BLMadministered lands have been identified
as proposed SEZs and would be
available for ROW application. Under
the SEZ program alternative, the
management of solar energy
development on BLM-administered
lands would be the same as described
for the solar energy development
program alternative. The BLM would
establish comprehensive program
administration and authorization
policies and design features. The
elements of the BLM’s new program
under this alternative would be
implemented through amendment of the
land use plans within the 6-state area.
Under the no action alternative, solar
energy development would continue on
BLM-administered lands in accordance
with existing solar energy policies. The
BLM would not implement a
comprehensive Solar Energy Program to
provide guidance to BLM field staff,
developers, and other stakeholders in
the 6-state study area. Specifically, the
required program administration and
authorization policies as well as design
features and land use plan amendments
proposed in the 2 action alternatives
would not be implemented. Future solar
energy projects and land use plan
amendments would continue to be
evaluated solely on an individual, caseby-case basis.
DOE-Specific Information
The DOE is required to take actions to
meet mandates under Executive Order
13212, ‘‘Actions to Expedite EnergyRelated Projects,’’ published in the
Federal Register on May 22, 2001 (66
FR 28357); Executive Order 13514,
‘‘Federal Leadership in Environmental,
Energy, and Economic Performance,’’
published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2009 (74 FR 52117); and
Section 603 of the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (Pub. L.
109–58). The DOE’s purpose and need
is to satisfy both executive orders and
comply with congressional mandates to
promote, expedite, and advance the
production and transmission of
environmentally sound energy
resources, including renewable energy
resources and, in particular, costcompetitive solar energy systems at the
utility scale.
Specifically, the DOE proposes to
further integrate environmental
considerations into its analysis and
selection of solar projects that it will
support. In the Programmatic EIS, the
DOE will build on the BLM’s analysis of
potential impacts of utility-scale solar
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
development on the environment for all
phases of development to provide a
technical basis for the development of
guidance. The DOE will consider, as
appropriate, the relevance of the
analytical results for all lands, not just
BLM-administered lands in the six state
area.
The DOE would use this information
to develop guidance for the
development of solar energy projects.
The DOE’s investment and deployment
strategy would incorporate a decisionmaking framework of guidance for early
consideration of sound environmental
practices and potential mitigation
measures for solar energy development.
Development of a guidance framework,
based on the analyses of the
Programmatic EIS, would give the DOE
the tools with which to make more
informed, environmentally sound
decisions at the outset, help to
streamline future environmental
analysis and documentation for DOEsupported solar projects, and support
the DOE’s efforts to comprehensively (1)
determine where to make technology
and resource investments to minimize
the environmental impacts of solar
technologies and (2) establish
environmental mitigation
recommendations for financial
assistance recipients to consider in
project plans when applying for DOE
funding.
Through this Programmatic EIS, the
DOE is evaluating 2 alternatives: an
action alternative and a no action
alternative. Under the action alternative,
the DOE would develop programmatic
guidance to further integrate
environmental considerations into its
analysis and selection of solar projects
that it will support. The DOE would use
the information about environmental
impacts provided in this Programmatic
EIS to appropriately amend its
programmatic approaches to facilitate
the advancement of solar energy
development. Under the no action
alternative, the DOE would continue to
conduct environmental reviews of DOEfunded solar projects on a case-by-case
basis. It would not develop
programmatic guidance and explicit
environmental guidelines and
mitigation recommendations to apply to
DOE-funded solar projects.
DOE’s Western Area Power
Administration (Western) markets and
transmits wholesale electrical power
through an integrated 17,000-circuit
mile, high-voltage transmission system
across 15 western states, including parts
of the 6-state study area for this
Programmatic EIS. Western’s purpose
and need for participating in this
Programmatic EIS is to identify
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
potential transmission impacts and
recommend mitigation measures for
transmission lines associated with solar
energy projects. Western anticipates
using the transmission environmental
impact and mitigation measures
analyses in this Programmatic EIS to
streamline its own NEPA documents
once specific projects are identified and
interconnection requests are filed with
Western. With the Programmatic EIS
providing the basis for this analysis,
interconnection project-specific NEPA
documents should be more concise and
take less time to prepare, resulting in
efficiencies for both Western and the
project proponent.
Preferred Alternative
The solar energy development
program alternative is the BLM
preferred alternative. The DOE has not
yet identified a preferred alternative.
Public Participation
A notice of intent to prepare this PEIS
was published in the Federal Register
on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30908). This
notice initiated the first scoping period,
which lasted from May 29 to July 15,
2008. During that period, the BLM and
the DOE invited the public to provide
comments on the scope and objectives
of the Programmatic EIS, including
identification of issues and alternatives
that should be considered in the
Programmatic EIS analyses. Public
meetings were held at 11 locations
across the 6 states. Comments were also
collected via the project Web site and by
mail. A second scoping period was
announced through the ‘‘Notice of
Availability of Maps and Additional
Public Scoping’’ published in the
Federal Register on June 30, 2009 (74
FR 31307). This scoping period was
initiated to solicit public comments on
24 specific tracts of BLM-administered
land proposed to receive in-depth study
for solar development in the
Programmatic EIS. Specifically, the
Agencies solicited comments about
environmental issues, existing resource
data, and industry interest with respect
to the 24 solar energy study areas.
Public comments were collected via the
project Web site and by mail.
Approximately 15,900 individuals,
organizations, and government agencies
provided comments during the first
scoping process, and approximately 300
entities provided comments during the
second scoping process.
In addition to public scoping, the
BLM initiated government-togovernment consultation with 316
Native American Tribes, Chapters, and
Bands with a potential interest in solar
energy development on BLM-
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78983
administered lands in the 6-state study
area. The BLM is also coordinating with
and soliciting input from the State
Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) in
each of the 6 states in the study area and
from the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation. In addition, the National
Council of SHPOs, the National Trust
for Historic Preservation, and tribal
governments have been invited to
consult on the Programmatic EIS and
the preparation of a National
Programmatic Agreement regarding
solar energy development.
The Draft Programmatic EIS consists
of approximately 11,000 pages in 8
volumes. All readers are encouraged to
review the document electronically. The
Executive Summary and Reader’s
Guide, including a digital versatile disc
(DVD) containing the entire document,
is available upon request. The document
is also available through the project Web
site at https://solareis.anl.gov, the BLM
Web site at https://www.blm.gov, and the
DOE NEPA Web site at https://
nepa.energy.gov.
Other Agency Involvement
Cooperating Federal agencies on the
Programmatic EIS include the
Department of Defense; the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service; the National Park
Service; the Bureau of Reclamation; the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9; and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, South Pacific Division.
Other cooperating agencies on the
Programmatic EIS include the Arizona
Game and Fish Department; the
California Energy Commission and
Public Utilities Commission; the Nevada
Department of Wildlife, the N–4 Grazing
Board; the Utah Public Lands Policy
Coordination Office; Clark, Esmeralda,
Eureka, Lincoln, and Nye Counties,
Nevada; Saguache County, Colorado;
and Dona Ana County, New Mexico.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
78984
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, and 43
CFR 1610.2
Michael D. Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty
Management, Bureau of Land Management.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010–31725 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 13876–000]
South Run Pumped Storage, LLC;
Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and
Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
December 13, 2010.
On October 26, 2010, South Run
Pumped Storage, LLC, Massachusetts,
filed an application for a preliminary
permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the
Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to
study the feasibility of the South Run
Pumped Storage Project (South Run
Project or project) to be located on
South Run, near Norton, Medina and
Summit counties, Ohio. The sole
purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder
priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary
permit does not authorize the permit
holder to perform any land-disturbing
activities or otherwise enter upon lands
or waters owned by others without the
owners’ express permission.
The proposed project would consist
of: (1) An excavated, diked, and asphaltlined 255-acre upper reservoir having a
maximum water surface area of about
195 acres and a total volume of 7,805
acre-feet; (2) a 7,760-acre-foot capacity
underground lower reservoir, 2,200 feet
below ground surface, created by
previous limestone mining activities; (3)
a diversion channel around the west
and south sides of the upper reservoir
with sufficient capacity to carry a 100year flood flow of 1,170 cubic feet per
second; (4) a 28-foot-diameter, 7,000foot-long, concrete-lined power tunnel
located 300 feet below the ground
surface that extends from the upper
reservoir to two 17.5-foot-diameter,
2,400-foot-long concrete-lined vertical
shafts connecting the power tunnel with
the underground powerhouse
penstocks; (5) six 6-foot-3-inch
diameter, 235-foot-long, steel-and
concrete-lined penstocks; (6) an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
underground powerhouse containing six
250-megawatt (MW) reversible pumpturbines; (7) an underground
transformer gallery; (8) a 3-mile-long,
345-kilovolt overhead transmission line;
and (9) appurtenant facilities. The
estimated annual generation of the
South Run Project would be between
1,300 and 2,000 gigawatt-hours,
depending on utilization factors. There
are no Federal or state lands associated
with the project.
Applicant Contact: Daniel R. Irvin,
Free Flow Power Corporation, 33
Commercial Street, Gloucester, MA
01930; phone: (978) 252–7631.
FERC Contact: Sergiu Serban; phone:
(202) 502–6211.
Deadline for filing comments, motions
to intervene, competing applications
(without notices of intent), or notices of
intent to file competing applications: 60
days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of
intent must meet the requirements of 18
CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to
intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed
electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the
eComment system at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end
of your comments. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support.
Although the Commission strongly
encourages electronic filing, documents
may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
More information about this project,
including a copy of the application, can
be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link of Commission’s Web site at http:
//www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P–13876–000)
in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–31708 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 13213–001]
Lock 14 Hydro Partners; Notice of
Intent To File License Application,
Filing of Pre-Application Document,
and Approving Use of the Traditional
Licensing Process
December 10, 2010.
a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to
File License Application and Request to
Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
b. Project No.: 13213–001.
c. Dated Filed: October 12, 2010.
d. Submitted By: Lock 14 Hydro
Partners.
e. Name of Project: Kentucky Lock
and Dam 14 Project.
f. Location: On the Kentucky River, in
Lee County, Kentucky.
g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 4.6 of the
Commission’s regulations.
h. Potential Applicant Contact: David
Brown Kinloch, Soft Energy Associates,
Agent for Lock 14 Hydro Partners, 414
South Wenzel Street, Louisville, KY
40204, (502) 589–0975.
i. FERC Contact: Sean Murphy at
(202) 502–6145; or e-mail at
sean.murphy@ferc.gov.
j. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed its
request to use the Traditional Licensing
Process on October 11, 2010. Lock 14
Hydro Partners provided public notice
of its request on November 15, 2010. In
a letter dated December 10, 2010, the
Director of the Office of Energy Projects
approved Lock 14 Hydro Partners’
request to use the Traditional Licensing
Process.
k. With this notice, we are initiating
informal consultation with: (a) The U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA
Fisheries under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act and the joint
agency regulations thereunder at 50
CFR, part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries
under section 305(b) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c)
the Kentucky State Historic Preservation
Officer, as required by Section 106,
National Historical Preservation Act,
and the implementing regulations of the
Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
l. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed a PreApplication Document (PAD; including
a proposed process plan and schedule)
with the Commission, pursuant to 18
CFR 5.6 of the Commission’s
regulations.
m. A copy of the PAD is available for
review at the Commission in the Public
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78980-78984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31725]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO300000.L14300000]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern
States and Notice of Public Meetings
AGENCIES: Bureau of Land Management, Interior; Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Department of
Energy (DOE) (the Agencies) as co-lead agencies announce the
availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States (BLM/DES
10-59, DOE/EIS--0403). The BLM and the DOE have prepared this document
in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended; the Council on Environmental Quality, the DOE, and
the Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations implementing NEPA; and
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended.
[[Page 78981]]
DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered in the Final
Programmatic EIS, the Agencies must receive written comments on the
Draft Programmatic EIS within 90 days following the date the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register. The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings
on the Draft Programmatic EIS. The locations of scheduled public
meetings are listed in the Supplementary Information section below. The
public will also be notified of the dates and times of these meetings
at least 15 days in advance via local media, the project Web site, and
the DOE NEPA Web site.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments related to the Draft
Programmatic EIS by the following methods:
Web site: Using the online comment form available on the
project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. This is the preferred method
of commenting.
Mail: Addressed to: Solar Energy Draft Programmatic EIS,
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue--EVS/240, Argonne,
Illinois 60439.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information on
the Draft Programmatic EIS should be directed to Linda Resseguie, BLM
Solar Programmatic EIS Project Manager, BLM Washington Office, by e-
mail at linda_resseguie@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202-912-7337; or
to Jane Summerson, DOE Solar Programmatic EIS Document Manager, by e-
mail at jane.summerson@ee.doe.gov, or by telephone at 202-287-6188. For
general information regarding the BLM NEPA process, contact Shannon
Stewart, Senior Planning and Environmental Analyst, BLM Washington
Office, by e-mail at shannon_stewart@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202-
912-7219. For general information regarding the DOE NEPA process,
contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC-54, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, by telephone at 202-586-4600, or leave a
message at 1-800-472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft Programmatic EIS, references, and
additional information regarding solar energy development are available
at the project Web site: https://solareis.anl.gov. An electronic copy of
the Draft Programmatic EIS can be viewed in any BLM State Office public
room in the 6-state study area and will be available through the BLM
Web site at https://www.blm.gov. A complete, printed copy is available
for review at the following BLM offices:
Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix,
Arizona 85004.
Caliente Field Office, US Highway 93 Building 1, Caliente,
Nevada 89008.
California Desert District, 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos,
Moreno Valley, California 92553.
California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623,
Sacramento, California 95825.
Cedar City Field Office, 176 East D.L. Sargent Drive, Cedar City,
Utah 84721.
Lake Havasu Field Office, 2610 Sweetwater Avenue, Lake Havasu City,
Arizona 86406.
Las Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New
Mexico 88005.
Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial Boulevard, Reno, Nevada 89502.
San Luis Valley Public Lands Center, 1803 West Highway 160, Monte
Vista, Colorado 81144.
Southern Nevada District Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89130.
Tonopah Field Office, 1553 South Main Street, Tonopah, Nevada
89049.
Utah State Office, 440 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84101.
The Draft Programmatic EIS is also available on the DOE NEPA Web
site at https://nepa.energy.gov.
The BLM and the DOE will hold 14 public meetings on the Draft
Programmatic EIS to provide an overview of the document, respond to
questions, and take public comments. The meetings will be announced
through local news media, the project Web site (https://solareis.anl.gov), and the DOE NEPA Web site (https://nepa.energy.gov),
at least 15 days in advance. Public meetings are currently planned for
the following locations:
Alamosa, Colorado; Barstow, California; Caliente, Nevada; Cedar
City, Utah; El Centro, California; Goldfield, Nevada; Las Cruces, New
Mexico; Las Vegas, Nevada; Ontario, California; Palm Springs,
California; Phoenix, Arizona; Salt Lake City, Utah; Tucson, Arizona;
Washington, DC.
At these meetings, the public will have an opportunity to provide
oral and written comments. Oral and written comments from the meetings
and additional written comments submitted during the comment period
will be considered by the Agencies in preparing the Final Programmatic
EIS. Comments submitted after the close of the comment period will be
considered to the extent practicable.
Background
The BLM is considering taking further actions to facilitate solar
energy development in compliance with various orders, mandates, and
agency policies. For the BLM, these actions include the evaluation of a
new Solar Energy Program applicable to utility-scale solar energy
development on BLM-administered lands in 6 southwestern states
(Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah). The DOE
is considering taking actions to facilitate solar energy development in
compliance with various orders, mandates, and agency policies. For the
DOE, these actions include the evaluation of developing new program
guidance relevant to DOE-supported solar energy projects. The BLM and
the DOE are working jointly as lead Agencies to prepare this
Programmatic EIS to evaluate the proposed BLM program and whether to
develop the DOE guidance. The Draft Programmatic EIS assesses
environmental, social, and economic impacts associated with the
development and implementation of agency-specific programs that would
facilitate environmentally responsible utility-scale solar energy
development in 6 southwestern states. For the purposes of the
Programmatic EIS, utility-scale solar technologies considered to be
viable for deployment over the next 20 years include 3 concentrating
solar power technologies (i.e., parabolic trough, power tower, and dish
engine systems), and photovoltaic technologies. Because the
Programmatic EIS involves environmental effects over a broad geographic
and time horizon, the depth and detail of the impact analysis is
general, focusing on major impacts in a qualitative manner. The
Programmatic EIS does not assess site-specific issues associated with
any future individual solar energy development projects. Future
utility-scale solar energy development decisions will be subject to
analysis under NEPA that may tier to the programmatic analysis.
BLM-Specific Information
The BLM has identified a need to respond in a more efficient and
effective manner to the high interest in siting utility-scale solar
energy development on public lands and ensure consistent application of
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse impacts of such
development. The BLM proposes to develop a new Solar Energy Program to
further support utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-
administered lands that would be applicable to all pending and future
[[Page 78982]]
solar energy development applications upon execution of the Record of
Decision for the Solar Programmatic EIS.
The proposed Solar Energy Program has been designed to further the
BLM's ability to meet the requirements for facilitating solar energy
development on BLM-administered lands established by the Energy Policy
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-58) and Secretarial Order 3285A1 issued by the
Secretary of the Interior. In particular, the proposed program has been
designed to meet the requirements of Order 3285A1 to identify and
prioritize solar energy development in locations best suited for such
development, called solar energy zones (SEZ).
The objectives of the BLM's proposed Solar Energy Program include:
Facilitating near-term utility-scale solar energy
development on public lands;
Minimizing potential negative environmental, social, and
economic impacts;
Providing flexibility to consider a variety of solar
energy projects (i.e., by location, facility size, or technology);
Optimizing existing transmission infrastructure and
corridors; and
Standardizing and streamlining the authorization process
for utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered lands.
The anticipated elements of the BLM's proposed Solar Energy Program
include:
Identification of lands excluded from utility-scale solar
energy development in the 6-state study area;
Identification of priority areas within the lands open to
solar energy development that are best suited for utility-scale
production of solar energy in accordance with the requirements of
Secretarial Order 3285A1 (i.e., proposed SEZs);
Establishment of mitigation requirements for solar energy
development on public lands to ensure the most environmentally
responsible development and delivery of solar energy; and
Amendment of BLM land use plans in the 6-state study area
to adopt those elements of the new Solar Energy Program that pertain to
land use planning.
A reasonably foreseeable development (RFD) scenario was developed
as part of the Programmatic EIS to help define the potential magnitude
of solar energy development that could occur within the 6-state study
area over the next 20 years. On the basis of the RFD scenario, the
estimated amount of solar energy generation on BLM-administered lands
in the study area over the 20-year study period is about 24,000
megawatts, with a corresponding dedicated use of about 214,000 acres of
BLM-administered lands.
Through the Programmatic EIS, the BLM is evaluating 3 alternatives
for managing utility-scale solar energy development on BLM-administered
lands in the 6-state study area. These alternatives include two action
alternatives--a solar energy development program alternative and a SEZ
program alternative--and a no action alternative.
Under the solar energy development program alternative, the BLM
would establish a new Solar Energy Program of administration and
authorization policies and required design features to replace certain
elements of its existing solar energy policies. The lands that would be
excluded from solar energy development include BLM-administered lands
currently off-limits to solar energy development, including lands
prohibited by law, regulation, presidential proclamation, or executive
order (e.g., lands in the National Landscape Conservation System),
along with lands that (1) have slopes greater than or equal to 5
percent; (2) have solar insolation levels (i.e., a measurement of the
amount of sunlight that strikes the earth's surface) below 6.5
kilowatt-hours per square meter per day; and (3) have known resources,
resource uses, or special designations identified in local land use
plans that are incompatible with solar energy development. On the basis
of these exclusions, approximately 22 million acres of BLM-administered
lands would be available for right-of-way (ROW) application under this
alternative.
As part of the solar energy development program alternative, the
BLM would also identify a number of SEZs within the lands available for
ROW application. An SEZ is defined by the BLM as an area well suited to
utility-scale energy production, with few impediments to facility
construction and operation where BLM would prioritize solar energy and
associated transmission infrastructure development. Approximately
677,400 acres have been identified as proposed SEZs. The elements of
the BLM's new program under this alternative would be implemented
through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state area.
Under the SEZ program alternative, the BLM would replace certain
elements of its current solar energy policies with a program that would
authorize utility-scale solar energy development only in the SEZs.
Unlike the solar energy development program alternative, lands outside
of SEZs would be excluded from utility-scale solar energy development
ROW applications. Under this alternative, about 677,400 acres of BLM-
administered lands have been identified as proposed SEZs and would be
available for ROW application. Under the SEZ program alternative, the
management of solar energy development on BLM-administered lands would
be the same as described for the solar energy development program
alternative. The BLM would establish comprehensive program
administration and authorization policies and design features. The
elements of the BLM's new program under this alternative would be
implemented through amendment of the land use plans within the 6-state
area.
Under the no action alternative, solar energy development would
continue on BLM-administered lands in accordance with existing solar
energy policies. The BLM would not implement a comprehensive Solar
Energy Program to provide guidance to BLM field staff, developers, and
other stakeholders in the 6-state study area. Specifically, the
required program administration and authorization policies as well as
design features and land use plan amendments proposed in the 2 action
alternatives would not be implemented. Future solar energy projects and
land use plan amendments would continue to be evaluated solely on an
individual, case-by-case basis.
DOE-Specific Information
The DOE is required to take actions to meet mandates under
Executive Order 13212, ``Actions to Expedite Energy-Related Projects,''
published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28357);
Executive Order 13514, ``Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy,
and Economic Performance,'' published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2009 (74 FR 52117); and Section 603 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (Pub. L. 109-58). The
DOE's purpose and need is to satisfy both executive orders and comply
with congressional mandates to promote, expedite, and advance the
production and transmission of environmentally sound energy resources,
including renewable energy resources and, in particular, cost-
competitive solar energy systems at the utility scale.
Specifically, the DOE proposes to further integrate environmental
considerations into its analysis and selection of solar projects that
it will support. In the Programmatic EIS, the DOE will build on the
BLM's analysis of potential impacts of utility-scale solar
[[Page 78983]]
development on the environment for all phases of development to provide
a technical basis for the development of guidance. The DOE will
consider, as appropriate, the relevance of the analytical results for
all lands, not just BLM-administered lands in the six state area.
The DOE would use this information to develop guidance for the
development of solar energy projects. The DOE's investment and
deployment strategy would incorporate a decision-making framework of
guidance for early consideration of sound environmental practices and
potential mitigation measures for solar energy development. Development
of a guidance framework, based on the analyses of the Programmatic EIS,
would give the DOE the tools with which to make more informed,
environmentally sound decisions at the outset, help to streamline
future environmental analysis and documentation for DOE-supported solar
projects, and support the DOE's efforts to comprehensively (1)
determine where to make technology and resource investments to minimize
the environmental impacts of solar technologies and (2) establish
environmental mitigation recommendations for financial assistance
recipients to consider in project plans when applying for DOE funding.
Through this Programmatic EIS, the DOE is evaluating 2
alternatives: an action alternative and a no action alternative. Under
the action alternative, the DOE would develop programmatic guidance to
further integrate environmental considerations into its analysis and
selection of solar projects that it will support. The DOE would use the
information about environmental impacts provided in this Programmatic
EIS to appropriately amend its programmatic approaches to facilitate
the advancement of solar energy development. Under the no action
alternative, the DOE would continue to conduct environmental reviews of
DOE-funded solar projects on a case-by-case basis. It would not develop
programmatic guidance and explicit environmental guidelines and
mitigation recommendations to apply to DOE-funded solar projects.
DOE's Western Area Power Administration (Western) markets and
transmits wholesale electrical power through an integrated 17,000-
circuit mile, high-voltage transmission system across 15 western
states, including parts of the 6-state study area for this Programmatic
EIS. Western's purpose and need for participating in this Programmatic
EIS is to identify potential transmission impacts and recommend
mitigation measures for transmission lines associated with solar energy
projects. Western anticipates using the transmission environmental
impact and mitigation measures analyses in this Programmatic EIS to
streamline its own NEPA documents once specific projects are identified
and interconnection requests are filed with Western. With the
Programmatic EIS providing the basis for this analysis, interconnection
project-specific NEPA documents should be more concise and take less
time to prepare, resulting in efficiencies for both Western and the
project proponent.
Preferred Alternative
The solar energy development program alternative is the BLM
preferred alternative. The DOE has not yet identified a preferred
alternative.
Public Participation
A notice of intent to prepare this PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30908). This notice initiated
the first scoping period, which lasted from May 29 to July 15, 2008.
During that period, the BLM and the DOE invited the public to provide
comments on the scope and objectives of the Programmatic EIS, including
identification of issues and alternatives that should be considered in
the Programmatic EIS analyses. Public meetings were held at 11
locations across the 6 states. Comments were also collected via the
project Web site and by mail. A second scoping period was announced
through the ``Notice of Availability of Maps and Additional Public
Scoping'' published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009 (74 FR
31307). This scoping period was initiated to solicit public comments on
24 specific tracts of BLM-administered land proposed to receive in-
depth study for solar development in the Programmatic EIS.
Specifically, the Agencies solicited comments about environmental
issues, existing resource data, and industry interest with respect to
the 24 solar energy study areas. Public comments were collected via the
project Web site and by mail.
Approximately 15,900 individuals, organizations, and government
agencies provided comments during the first scoping process, and
approximately 300 entities provided comments during the second scoping
process.
In addition to public scoping, the BLM initiated government-to-
government consultation with 316 Native American Tribes, Chapters, and
Bands with a potential interest in solar energy development on BLM-
administered lands in the 6-state study area. The BLM is also
coordinating with and soliciting input from the State Historic
Preservation Offices (SHPO) in each of the 6 states in the study area
and from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. In addition,
the National Council of SHPOs, the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, and tribal governments have been invited to consult on
the Programmatic EIS and the preparation of a National Programmatic
Agreement regarding solar energy development.
The Draft Programmatic EIS consists of approximately 11,000 pages
in 8 volumes. All readers are encouraged to review the document
electronically. The Executive Summary and Reader's Guide, including a
digital versatile disc (DVD) containing the entire document, is
available upon request. The document is also available through the
project Web site at https://solareis.anl.gov, the BLM Web site at https://www.blm.gov, and the DOE NEPA Web site at https://nepa.energy.gov.
Other Agency Involvement
Cooperating Federal agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the
Department of Defense; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the National
Park Service; the Bureau of Reclamation; the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 9; and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
South Pacific Division.
Other cooperating agencies on the Programmatic EIS include the
Arizona Game and Fish Department; the California Energy Commission and
Public Utilities Commission; the Nevada Department of Wildlife, the N-4
Grazing Board; the Utah Public Lands Policy Coordination Office; Clark,
Esmeralda, Eureka, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, Nevada; Saguache County,
Colorado; and Dona Ana County, New Mexico.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
[[Page 78984]]
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, and 43 CFR 1610.2
Michael D. Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty Management, Bureau of Land
Management.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010-31725 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P