Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, CA; Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Public Meeting, and Receipt of Applications, 79013-79015 [2010-31425]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond; including through the use of
appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
This Notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Family Unification
Program (FUP).
OMB Control Number: 2577–0259.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use: The
Family Unification Program (FUP) is a
program, authorized under section 8(x)
of the United States Housing Act of
1937 {42 U.S.C. 1437(X)}, that provides
housing choice vouchers to PHAs to
assist families for whom the lack of
adequate housing is a primary factor in
the imminent placement of the family’s
child, or children, in out-of-home care;
or the delay in the discharge of the
child, or children, to the family from
out-of-home care. Youths at least 18
years old and not more than 21 years
old (have not reached 22nd birthday)
who left foster care at age 16 or older
and who do not have adequate housing
are also eligible to receive housing
assistance under the FUP. As required
by statute, a FUP voucher issued to such
a youth may only be used to provide
housing assistance for the youth for a
maximum of 18 months.
Vouchers awarded under FUP are
administered by PHAs under HUD’s
regulations for the Housing Choice
Voucher program (24 CFR Part 982).
Agency Form Numbers: HUD–52515
(OMB Approval # 2577–0169), HUD
50058 (OMB approval # 2577–0083),
HUD–2993 (OMB Approval # 2577–
0259), HUD–96010 (OMB Approval #
2535–0114), HUD 96011 (OMB approval
# 2535–0118), HUD–2990, HUD–2991
(OMB Approval # 2506–0112) and HUD
2880 (OMB Approval # 2510–0011), SF–
424 (OMB Approval # 0348–0043), SF
LLL (OMB Approval # 0348–0043).
Members of the Affected Public:
Public Housing Agencies.
Estimation of the total number of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents: The total burden for data
collection is estimated at 6,101.95
hours. It is anticipated that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
approximately 265 PHAs will apply for
FUP vouchers each year the program is
funded. The estimate of the total annual
cost burden to respondents/record
keepers resulting from the collection of
this information is: 6,101.95 burden
hours × $34.34 = $209,540.96; assuming
a Manager’s hourly rate at the GS–13/
Step 1 level.
*Burden hours for forms showing zero
burden hours in this collection are
reflected in the OMB approval number
cited or do not have a reportable
burden. The burden hours for this
collection is 6,101.95.
Status of the Proposed Information
Collection: Revision of a currently
approved collection.
Authority: Section 3506 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35,
as amended.
Dated: December 13, 2010.
Merrie Nichols-Dixon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Program and Legislative Initiatives.
[FR Doc. 2010–31794 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5375–N–49]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79013
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Dated: December 9, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010–31365 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2010–N225; 1112–0000–
81420–F2]
Santa Clara Valley Habitat
Conservation Plan and Natural
Community Conservation Plan, CA;
Availability of Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, Public Meeting, and
Receipt of Applications
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement, notice
of public meeting, and receipt of
applications.
AGENCY:
This notice advises the public
that we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), have received
applications for incidental take permits
pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act) from the County of Santa
Clara; Cities of San Jose, Gilroy, and
Morgan Hill; Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority, and Santa
Clara Valley Water District (Applicants).
The Applicants prepared the Draft Santa
Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan
and Natural Community Conservation
Plan (HCP/NCCP) pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act and the California
Natural Community Conservation
Planning Act of 2002 (NCCPA).
This notice announces the availability
of the permit applications, Draft HCP/
NCCP, Draft Implementing Agreement
(IA), and Draft Environmental Impact
Report/Environmental Impact Statement
(EIR/EIS) for public review and
comment. The Service is considering
the issuance of a 50-year incidental take
permit for 21 Covered Species in a
509,883-acre Permit Area. A seventh
applicant will also be considered for
permit coverage; the Implementing
Entity (likely a joint powers agency) that
will form prior to permit issuance. The
Implementing Entity is described in the
Draft HCP/NCCP and Draft IA and
would be composed of representatives
from each of the Applicants. The
Applicants are requesting a permit to
incidentally take 11 animal species and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
79014
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
are seeking assurances for 10 plant
species. The permit is needed because
take of species could occur as a result
of proposed Covered Activities.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. on April 18, 2011.
We will accept comments at two public
meetings:
1. Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 6:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Morgan Hill, CA.
2. Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 6:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Palo Alto, CA.
ADDRESSES: Please send written
comments to Cori Mustin, Senior Fish
and Wildlife Biologist, Sacramento Fish
and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way,
W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825. You
may also submit comments by e-mail to
R8SCVHPcomments@fws.gov or by
facsimile to (916) 414–6713. If you
choose to submit comments via e-mail,
please ensure that the file size does not
exceed 10 megabytes. E-mails that
exceed the maximum file size may not
be properly transmitted to the Service.
Please send comments related
specifically to the Draft EIR and
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) process to the County of Santa
Clara Executive’s Office, Kenneth
Schreiber, HCP/NCCP Program
Manager, County Government Center,
East Wing, 11th Floor, 70 West Hedding
Street, San Jose, CA 95110. You may
also submit comments by facsimile to
(408) 295–1613.
The public meeting locations follow:
1. Wednesday, February 9, 2011, at
the Morgan Hill Community and
Cultural Center, El Toro Room, 17000
Monterey Road, Morgan Hill, CA 95037.
2. Tuesday, February 15, 2011, at the
Peninsula Conservation Center, Raptor
Room, 3921 East Bayshore Road, Palo
Alto, CA 94303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Thomas, Branch Chief,
Conservation Planning; or Eric
Tattersall, Deputy Assistant Field
Supervisor/Division Chief, Conservation
Planning and Recovery; 2800 Cottage
Way, W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825,
or telephone (916) 414–6600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Availability of Documents
All documents are available for
viewing at the HCP/NCCP’s Web site:
https://www.scv-habitatplan.org/www/
default.aspx. Individuals wishing
copies of the applications, Draft HCP/
NCCP, Draft EIR/EIS, and/or Draft IA,
should contact the Service by telephone
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Copies of the subject documents are also
available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
In addition, copies of all documents are
available at the following library
locations:
1. Almaden Branch Library. 6445
Camden Avenue, San Jose, CA 95120.
2. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library.
150 E San Fernando Street, San Jose, CA
95112.
3. Gilroy Library. 7387 Rosanna
Street, Gilroy, CA 95020.
4. Morgan Hill Library. 660 West
Main Avenue, Morgan Hill, CA 95037.
5. Central Park Library. 2635
Homestead Road, Santa Clara, CA
95051.
6. City of Palo Alto Main Library.
1233 Newell Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303.
7. Fremont Main Library. 2400
Stevenson Boulevard, Fremont, CA
94538.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), and Federal regulations prohibit
the ‘‘take’’ of fish and wildlife species
federally listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of federally listed fish
or wildlife is defined under the Act as
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect
listed species, or attempt to engage in
such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). ‘‘Harm’’
includes significant habitat modification
or degradation that actually kills or
injures listed wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, and
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3(c)). Under
limited circumstances, we may issue
permits to authorize incidental take,
which is defined under the Act as take
that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, otherwise lawful activities.
Although take of plant species is not
prohibited under the Act, and therefore
cannot be authorized under an
incidental take permit, plant species are
proposed to be included on the permits
in recognition of the conservation
benefits provided to them under the
HCP/NCCP. Regulations governing
incidental take permits for threatened
and endangered species are found in 50
CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively. All
species included on the incidental take
permits, if issued, would receive
assurances under the Service’s ‘‘No
Surprises’’ regulation (50 CFR
17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)).
In order to comply with the
requirements of the Act, California
Endangered Species Act, and the
NCCPA, the Draft HCP/NCCP defines
biological goals and objectives;
evaluates the effects of Covered
Activities on Covered Species,
including indirect and cumulative
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
effects; describes a conservation
strategy; describes a monitoring and
adaptive management program;
identifies changed circumstances and
responsive actions; identifies funding
sources; and identifies alternative
actions to the proposed impacts. The
Draft HCP/NCCP is intended to be a
comprehensive and multijurisdictional
document that will facilitate regional
species conservation and assist the
Applicants to better manage anticipated
growth and development. The Draft
HCP/NCCP will also provide a
coordinated process for permitting and
mitigating the incidental take of
Covered Species as an alternative to the
current project-by-project review
process.
The Draft HCP/NCCP addresses 21
Covered Species, including 11 animal
species (2 federally endangered, 3
federally threatened, and 6 unlisted)
and 10 plant species (4 federally
endangered and 6 unlisted). The permit
would provide take authorization for all
animal species and assurances for all
plant species identified by the Draft
HCP/NCCP as Covered Species. Take
authorized for listed covered animal
species would be effective upon permit
issuance and adoption of all applicable
local ordinances. Take authorization for
currently unlisted covered animal
species would become effective
concurrent with listing, should the
species be listed under the Act during
the Permit Term.
The proposed permit would include
the following five federally listed
animal species: The threatened Bay
checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas
editha bayensis), threatened California
tiger salamander (Central California
Distinct Population Segment)
(Ambystoma californiense), threatened
California red-legged frog (Rana
draytonii), endangered least Bell’s vireo
(Vireo bellii pusillus), and endangered
San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis
mutica). The proposed permit would
include assurances for the following
four federally listed plant species: The
endangered Tiburon Indian paintbrush
(Castilleja affinis ssp. neglecta),
endangered coyote ceanothus
(Ceanothus ferrisae), endangered Santa
Clara Valley dudleya (Dudleya
setchellii), and endangered Metcalf
Canyon jewelflower (Streptanthus
albidus ssp. albidus).
The unlisted species proposed for
coverage under the Draft HCP/NCCP are
the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana
boylii), western pond turtle (Clemmys
marmorata), golden eagle (Aquila
chrysaetos), western burrowing owl
(Athene cunicularia hypugaea),
tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor),
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices
Townsend’s western big-eared bat
(Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii),
Mount Hamilton thistle (Cirsium
fontinale var. campylon), San Francisco
collinsia (Collinsia multicolor), fragrant
fritillary (Fritillaria liliacea), Loma
Prieta hoita (Hoita strobilina), smooth
lessingia (Lessingia micradenia var.
glabrata), and most beautiful
jewelflower (Streptanthus albidus ssp.
peramoenus).
The Applicants are requesting
coverage for incidental take resulting
from the following seven categories of
Covered Activities:
1. Urban Development,
2. Instream Capital Projects,
3. Instream Operation and
Maintenance Activities,
4. Rural Capital Projects,
5. Rural Operation and Maintenance
Activities,
6. Rural Development, and
7. Conservation Strategy
Implementation.
The proposed 509,883-acre Permit
Area is the area where incidental take of
Covered Species resulting from Covered
Activities could occur and includes the
Pajaro River and all or a portion of the
Llagas, Uvas, Pescadero, and Pacheco
subwatersheds and the Coyote Creek
watershed within Santa Clara County. A
large portion of the Guadalupe
watershed is also contained within the
Permit Area, as well as small areas
outside of each of these watersheds. The
Permit Area excludes existing State Park
lands.
Contained within the 509,883-acre
Permit Area is the 48,464-acre
Expanded Permit Area for Burrowing
Owl Conservation, which includes the
northern portion of Santa Clara County
and a small portion of both San Mateo
and Alameda Counties (see Figure 1–2
of the HCP/NCCP). Incidental take in
the Expanded Permit Area for
Burrowing Owl Conservation will be
limited to capture, harm, and
harassment of burrowing owls as a
result of implementing the conservation
strategy.
Covered Activities would result in the
permanent loss of up to 25,864 acres in
the Permit Area. Habitat models were
developed for most Covered Species and
used in the impacts analysis. Land cover
surrogates were used to identify
maximum impacts to species for which
habitat models could not be developed.
The Draft HCP/NCCP also describes
conditions on Covered Activities to
avoid or minimize take of Covered
Species.
The proposed conservation strategy
includes establishing a reserve system
that would be composed of an estimated
58,000 acres of large contiguous blocks
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Dec 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
of land that would be permanently
preserved, monitored, and managed.
The conservation strategy would remain
in rough step with impacts, and the
Reserve System would be assembled
according to predefined milestones
throughout the Permit Term.
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
The Service prepared the EIS, which
is the Federal portion of the Draft EIR/
EIS, to analyze the impacts of issuing
incidental take permits based on the
Draft HCP/NCCP. Santa Clara County
facilitated the preparation of the EIR
portion of the Draft EIR/EIS, in
compliance with the CEQA, but all
Applicants share the CEQA Lead
Agency role. The California Department
of Fish and Game is a CEQA Trustee
and Responsible Agency. The Draft EIR/
EIS was developed to inform the public
of the Proposed Action, alternatives,
and associated impacts; address public
comments received during the scoping
period for the Draft EIR/EIS; and
disclose irreversible commitments of
resources.
The proposed permit issuance triggers
the need for compliance with NEPA.
The Service published a Notice of Intent
(NOI) to prepare an EIR/EIS in the
Federal Register on September 6, 2007
(72 FR 51247). The NOI announced a
public scoping period during which
time the public was invited to provide
written comments and attend a public
scoping meeting, which was held on
September 26, 2007, in Morgan Hill,
California.
The Service is now providing notice
of the availability of the Draft EIS,
which evaluates the impacts of the
Proposed Action described above (i.e.,
issuance of the permits and
implementation of the Draft HCP/
NCCP), as well as the No Action
Alternative and Alternative A, which
are described below.
No Action Alternative: Under the No
Action Alternative, the Service would
not issue incidental take permits to the
Applicants, and the Draft HCP/NCCP
would not be implemented. Under this
alternative, projects that may adversely
affect federally listed species would
require project-level consultation with
the Service pursuant to section 7 or
section 10 of the Act. This project-level
approach would preclude landscapelevel conservation planning and would
not streamline the current permitting
process.
Alternative A (Reduced Permit Term):
Under Alternative A, the Service would
issue incidental take permits, and the
Applicants would implement a habitat
conservation plan and natural
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
79015
communities conservation plan that is
similar to the Draft HCP/NCCP
described in the Proposed Action;
however, the proposed Permit Term
would be reduced to 30 years. The
extent of Covered Activities and the
conservation strategy would be
subsequently reduced relative to the
Proposed Action.
Comments
The Service invites the public to
comment on the permit applications,
Draft HCP/NCCP, Draft IA, and Draft
EIR/EIS during the public comment
period (see DATES). Please direct written
comments to contacts listed in the
ADDRESSES section and questions to the
Service contacts listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
All comments and materials we receive,
including names and addresses, will
become part of the administrative record
and may be released to the public.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Reasonable Accommodation
The public meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Please make requests for specific
accommodations to Karen Molinari, ICF
International, at (408) 375–9979 or
kmolinari@icfi.com, at least 5 working
days prior to the meeting date.
Next Steps
This notice is provided under section
10(a) of the Act and Service regulations
for implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (40
CFR 1506.6). We will evaluate the
applications, associated documents, and
comments submitted thereon to prepare
a Final EIR/EIS. A permit decision will
be made no sooner than 30 days after
the publication of the NOA of for the
Final EIR/EIS and completion of the
Record of Decision.
Dated: December 6, 2010.
Robert Clarke,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Pacific
Southwest Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2010–31425 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79013-79015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31425]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2010-N225; 1112-0000-81420-F2]
Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural
Community Conservation Plan, CA; Availability of Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, Public Meeting, and Receipt of Applications
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement,
notice of public meeting, and receipt of applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received applications for incidental
take permits pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act) from the County of Santa Clara; Cities of
San Jose, Gilroy, and Morgan Hill; Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority, and Santa Clara Valley Water District (Applicants). The
Applicants prepared the Draft Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation
Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act and the California Natural Community
Conservation Planning Act of 2002 (NCCPA).
This notice announces the availability of the permit applications,
Draft HCP/NCCP, Draft Implementing Agreement (IA), and Draft
Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)
for public review and comment. The Service is considering the issuance
of a 50-year incidental take permit for 21 Covered Species in a
509,883-acre Permit Area. A seventh applicant will also be considered
for permit coverage; the Implementing Entity (likely a joint powers
agency) that will form prior to permit issuance. The Implementing
Entity is described in the Draft HCP/NCCP and Draft IA and would be
composed of representatives from each of the Applicants. The Applicants
are requesting a permit to incidentally take 11 animal species and
[[Page 79014]]
are seeking assurances for 10 plant species. The permit is needed
because take of species could occur as a result of proposed Covered
Activities.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 5 p.m. on April 18, 2011.
We will accept comments at two public meetings:
1. Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Morgan
Hill, CA.
2. Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Palo Alto,
CA.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments to Cori Mustin, Senior Fish and
Wildlife Biologist, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage
Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825. You may also submit comments by e-
mail to R8SCVHPcomments@fws.gov or by facsimile to (916) 414-6713. If
you choose to submit comments via e-mail, please ensure that the file
size does not exceed 10 megabytes. E-mails that exceed the maximum file
size may not be properly transmitted to the Service.
Please send comments related specifically to the Draft EIR and
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process to the County of
Santa Clara Executive's Office, Kenneth Schreiber, HCP/NCCP Program
Manager, County Government Center, East Wing, 11th Floor, 70 West
Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110. You may also submit comments by
facsimile to (408) 295-1613.
The public meeting locations follow:
1. Wednesday, February 9, 2011, at the Morgan Hill Community and
Cultural Center, El Toro Room, 17000 Monterey Road, Morgan Hill, CA
95037.
2. Tuesday, February 15, 2011, at the Peninsula Conservation
Center, Raptor Room, 3921 East Bayshore Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Thomas, Branch Chief,
Conservation Planning; or Eric Tattersall, Deputy Assistant Field
Supervisor/Division Chief, Conservation Planning and Recovery; 2800
Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825, or telephone (916) 414-6600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
All documents are available for viewing at the HCP/NCCP's Web site:
https://www.scv-habitatplan.org/www/default.aspx. Individuals wishing
copies of the applications, Draft HCP/NCCP, Draft EIR/EIS, and/or Draft
IA, should contact the Service by telephone (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Copies of the subject documents are also
available for public inspection during regular business hours at the
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). In addition, copies of all documents are available at the
following library locations:
1. Almaden Branch Library. 6445 Camden Avenue, San Jose, CA 95120.
2. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library. 150 E San Fernando Street,
San Jose, CA 95112.
3. Gilroy Library. 7387 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020.
4. Morgan Hill Library. 660 West Main Avenue, Morgan Hill, CA
95037.
5. Central Park Library. 2635 Homestead Road, Santa Clara, CA
95051.
6. City of Palo Alto Main Library. 1233 Newell Road, Palo Alto, CA
94303.
7. Fremont Main Library. 2400 Stevenson Boulevard, Fremont, CA
94538.
Background Information
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and Federal regulations prohibit the ``take'' of
fish and wildlife species federally listed as endangered or threatened.
Take of federally listed fish or wildlife is defined under the Act as
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or
collect listed species, or attempt to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C.
1538). ``Harm'' includes significant habitat modification or
degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including
breeding, feeding, and sheltering (50 CFR 17.3(c)). Under limited
circumstances, we may issue permits to authorize incidental take, which
is defined under the Act as take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. Although take of plant species
is not prohibited under the Act, and therefore cannot be authorized
under an incidental take permit, plant species are proposed to be
included on the permits in recognition of the conservation benefits
provided to them under the HCP/NCCP. Regulations governing incidental
take permits for threatened and endangered species are found in 50 CFR
17.32 and 17.22, respectively. All species included on the incidental
take permits, if issued, would receive assurances under the Service's
``No Surprises'' regulation (50 CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)).
In order to comply with the requirements of the Act, California
Endangered Species Act, and the NCCPA, the Draft HCP/NCCP defines
biological goals and objectives; evaluates the effects of Covered
Activities on Covered Species, including indirect and cumulative
effects; describes a conservation strategy; describes a monitoring and
adaptive management program; identifies changed circumstances and
responsive actions; identifies funding sources; and identifies
alternative actions to the proposed impacts. The Draft HCP/NCCP is
intended to be a comprehensive and multijurisdictional document that
will facilitate regional species conservation and assist the Applicants
to better manage anticipated growth and development. The Draft HCP/NCCP
will also provide a coordinated process for permitting and mitigating
the incidental take of Covered Species as an alternative to the current
project-by-project review process.
The Draft HCP/NCCP addresses 21 Covered Species, including 11
animal species (2 federally endangered, 3 federally threatened, and 6
unlisted) and 10 plant species (4 federally endangered and 6 unlisted).
The permit would provide take authorization for all animal species and
assurances for all plant species identified by the Draft HCP/NCCP as
Covered Species. Take authorized for listed covered animal species
would be effective upon permit issuance and adoption of all applicable
local ordinances. Take authorization for currently unlisted covered
animal species would become effective concurrent with listing, should
the species be listed under the Act during the Permit Term.
The proposed permit would include the following five federally
listed animal species: The threatened Bay checkerspot butterfly
(Euphydryas editha bayensis), threatened California tiger salamander
(Central California Distinct Population Segment) (Ambystoma
californiense), threatened California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii),
endangered least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), and endangered
San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica). The proposed permit would
include assurances for the following four federally listed plant
species: The endangered Tiburon Indian paintbrush (Castilleja affinis
ssp. neglecta), endangered coyote ceanothus (Ceanothus ferrisae),
endangered Santa Clara Valley dudleya (Dudleya setchellii), and
endangered Metcalf Canyon jewelflower (Streptanthus albidus ssp.
albidus).
The unlisted species proposed for coverage under the Draft HCP/NCCP
are the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii), western pond turtle
(Clemmys marmorata), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), western
burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), tricolored blackbird
(Agelaius tricolor),
[[Page 79015]]
Townsend's western big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii),
Mount Hamilton thistle (Cirsium fontinale var. campylon), San Francisco
collinsia (Collinsia multicolor), fragrant fritillary (Fritillaria
liliacea), Loma Prieta hoita (Hoita strobilina), smooth lessingia
(Lessingia micradenia var. glabrata), and most beautiful jewelflower
(Streptanthus albidus ssp. peramoenus).
The Applicants are requesting coverage for incidental take
resulting from the following seven categories of Covered Activities:
1. Urban Development,
2. Instream Capital Projects,
3. Instream Operation and Maintenance Activities,
4. Rural Capital Projects,
5. Rural Operation and Maintenance Activities,
6. Rural Development, and
7. Conservation Strategy Implementation.
The proposed 509,883-acre Permit Area is the area where incidental
take of Covered Species resulting from Covered Activities could occur
and includes the Pajaro River and all or a portion of the Llagas, Uvas,
Pescadero, and Pacheco subwatersheds and the Coyote Creek watershed
within Santa Clara County. A large portion of the Guadalupe watershed
is also contained within the Permit Area, as well as small areas
outside of each of these watersheds. The Permit Area excludes existing
State Park lands.
Contained within the 509,883-acre Permit Area is the 48,464-acre
Expanded Permit Area for Burrowing Owl Conservation, which includes the
northern portion of Santa Clara County and a small portion of both San
Mateo and Alameda Counties (see Figure 1-2 of the HCP/NCCP). Incidental
take in the Expanded Permit Area for Burrowing Owl Conservation will be
limited to capture, harm, and harassment of burrowing owls as a result
of implementing the conservation strategy.
Covered Activities would result in the permanent loss of up to
25,864 acres in the Permit Area. Habitat models were developed for most
Covered Species and used in the impacts analysis. Land cover surrogates
were used to identify maximum impacts to species for which habitat
models could not be developed. The Draft HCP/NCCP also describes
conditions on Covered Activities to avoid or minimize take of Covered
Species.
The proposed conservation strategy includes establishing a reserve
system that would be composed of an estimated 58,000 acres of large
contiguous blocks of land that would be permanently preserved,
monitored, and managed. The conservation strategy would remain in rough
step with impacts, and the Reserve System would be assembled according
to predefined milestones throughout the Permit Term.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
The Service prepared the EIS, which is the Federal portion of the
Draft EIR/EIS, to analyze the impacts of issuing incidental take
permits based on the Draft HCP/NCCP. Santa Clara County facilitated the
preparation of the EIR portion of the Draft EIR/EIS, in compliance with
the CEQA, but all Applicants share the CEQA Lead Agency role. The
California Department of Fish and Game is a CEQA Trustee and
Responsible Agency. The Draft EIR/EIS was developed to inform the
public of the Proposed Action, alternatives, and associated impacts;
address public comments received during the scoping period for the
Draft EIR/EIS; and disclose irreversible commitments of resources.
The proposed permit issuance triggers the need for compliance with
NEPA. The Service published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIR/
EIS in the Federal Register on September 6, 2007 (72 FR 51247). The NOI
announced a public scoping period during which time the public was
invited to provide written comments and attend a public scoping
meeting, which was held on September 26, 2007, in Morgan Hill,
California.
The Service is now providing notice of the availability of the
Draft EIS, which evaluates the impacts of the Proposed Action described
above (i.e., issuance of the permits and implementation of the Draft
HCP/NCCP), as well as the No Action Alternative and Alternative A,
which are described below.
No Action Alternative: Under the No Action Alternative, the Service
would not issue incidental take permits to the Applicants, and the
Draft HCP/NCCP would not be implemented. Under this alternative,
projects that may adversely affect federally listed species would
require project-level consultation with the Service pursuant to section
7 or section 10 of the Act. This project-level approach would preclude
landscape-level conservation planning and would not streamline the
current permitting process.
Alternative A (Reduced Permit Term): Under Alternative A, the
Service would issue incidental take permits, and the Applicants would
implement a habitat conservation plan and natural communities
conservation plan that is similar to the Draft HCP/NCCP described in
the Proposed Action; however, the proposed Permit Term would be reduced
to 30 years. The extent of Covered Activities and the conservation
strategy would be subsequently reduced relative to the Proposed Action.
Comments
The Service invites the public to comment on the permit
applications, Draft HCP/NCCP, Draft IA, and Draft EIR/EIS during the
public comment period (see DATES). Please direct written comments to
contacts listed in the ADDRESSES section and questions to the Service
contacts listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. All
comments and materials we receive, including names and addresses, will
become part of the administrative record and may be released to the
public. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Reasonable Accommodation
The public meetings are physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Please make requests for specific accommodations to Karen
Molinari, ICF International, at (408) 375-9979 or kmolinari@icfi.com,
at least 5 working days prior to the meeting date.
Next Steps
This notice is provided under section 10(a) of the Act and Service
regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (40 CFR 1506.6). We will evaluate the applications, associated
documents, and comments submitted thereon to prepare a Final EIR/EIS. A
permit decision will be made no sooner than 30 days after the
publication of the NOA of for the Final EIR/EIS and completion of the
Record of Decision.
Dated: December 6, 2010.
Robert Clarke,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2010-31425 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P