Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Center for Economic Studies Research Proposal Process and Project Management, 78212-78213 [2010-31471]
Download as PDF
78212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 15, 2010 / Notices
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 10, 2010.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–31466 Filed 12–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Center for
Economic Studies Research Proposal
Process and Project Management
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
SUMMARY:
To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Dr. Brian P. Holly, Project
Review Coordinator, Center for
Economic Studies, U.S Census Bureau,
Room 2K139, 4600 Silver Hill Road,
Washington, DC 20746 (or via the
Internet at brian.p.holly@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
I. Abstract
The U.S. Census Bureau through its
network of Census Research Data
Centers (RDCs) supports and encourages
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:10 Dec 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
research activity using Census Bureau
microdata to improve Census Bureau
programs. The RDCs provide access to
researchers, federal agencies, and other
institutions meeting the requirements of
Title 13 United States Code, Section
23(c) to non-publicly available Census
Bureau data files. The Center for
Economic Studies operates the RDC
system on behalf of the Census Bureau.
The objective of the Center for
Economic Studies (CES) and the
Research Data Centers (RDCs) is to
increase the utility and quality of
Census Bureau data products. The
external research program supported by
CES and the RDCs increases the quality
and utility of Census data in several
ways. First, access to microdata
encourages knowledgeable researchers
to become familiar with Census data
products and Census collection
methods. More importantly, providing
qualified researchers access to
confidential microdata enables research
projects that would not be possible
without access to respondent-level
information. This increases the value of
data that has been collected. Access to
the microdata also allows for data
linking not possible with aggregates,
both cross-survey linkages and
longitudinal linkages. These linkages
leverage the value of preexisting data.
Creative use of microdata can address
important policy questions without the
need for additional data collections.
In addition, the best means by which
the Census Bureau can check on the
quality of the data it collects, edits, and
tabulates is to make its micro records
available in a controlled, secure
environment to sophisticated users who,
by employing the micro records in the
course of rigorous analysis, will uncover
the strengths and weaknesses of the
micro records. Each set of observations
is the end result of dozens upon dozens
of decision rules covering definitions,
classifications, coding procedures,
processing rules, editing rules,
disclosure rules, and so on. The validity
and consequences of all these decision
rules only become evident when the
Census Bureau’s micro databases are
tested in the course of analysis.
Exposing to the light of research the
conceptual and processing assumptions
that are embedded in the Census
Bureau’s micro databases constitutes a
core element in the Census Bureau’s
commitment to quality. CES and the
RDCs conduct, facilitate, and support
microdata research.
The Proposal Process
Persons wishing to conduct research
at a Research Data Center must submit
a research proposal using the CES Web
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
site (https://www.ces.census.gov).
Detailed guidelines describe the
research proposal submission process.
There are two distinct steps to submit a
research proposal. The first step is the
development of a preliminary proposal.
The second step is the submission of a
final proposal.
Preliminary Proposal Development
Researchers who wish to develop a
proposal to conduct research at one of
the Census Bureau’s Research Data
Centers (RDC) initially contact the RDC
administrator at the center where the
research will be conducted. The
researcher discusses the proposed
project with the administrator to
determine whether the research fits with
the Bureau’s mission, is feasible, and is
likely to provide benefits to Census
Bureau programs under Title 13,
Chapter 5 of the U.S. Code. The
researcher registers as a user with CES
by opening an account through the
Center’s Web site (https://
www.ces.census.gov). All researchers
must have a user account in order to
submit preliminary and final proposals
to CES.
Working closely with the RDC
administrator, researchers develop a
preliminary research proposal that
includes information about the
researcher(s), RDC location(s) where the
research will be carried out, purpose of
the research, funding source, requested
datasets, desired software, a brief
narrative description of the research
project and proposed benefits to the
Census Bureau. The researcher enters
this information via the CES on-line
proposal management system accessible
on the CES Web site.
Once a preliminary proposal has been
submitted, the RDC administrator
reviews it and advises the researcher of
any suggestions for improvement. The
administrator must approve the
preliminary proposal before the
researcher can submit a final proposal to
CES.
Final Proposal Submission
The final proposal consists of three
separate documents in Adobe Acrobat
Portable Document Format (PDF): (1)
Abstract of the proposal, (2) Project
description (full proposal), and (3)
Statement of benefits to the Census
Bureau. The submitter uploads the final
documents to the CES management
system via his or her user account and
submits for Census Review by clicking
on the Submit link button. This locks
the project entry to prevent further edits
or document uploads.
Document length varies by type. The
abstract is limited to one page, the
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 15, 2010 / Notices
proposal narrative is limited to fifteen
pages single-spaced or thirty pages
double spaced, and the benfits
statement can range from five to as
much as twelve pages at the submitter’s
discretion.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Progress Reports
Each project research team is
expected to file annual progress reports
and agrees to submit a final project
report called a Post Project Certification
(PPC). The annual progress reports vary
in length and content and have no fixed
format. The Post Project Certification
follows a fixed format and is initially
generated as a template by the project
management system.
II. Method of Collection
User Account. Individuals create a
user account on the CES Project
Management System by visiting the CES
Web site (https://www.ces.census.gov/
index/php) and click on the ‘‘Register’’
link on the front page. A template
appears which requests contact
information from the respondent,
including name, mailing address, e-mail
address, telephone, professional
affiliation, and citizenship. Some fields
are required and others are voluntary.
The information is retained in the
system database and periodically
modified by authorized CES staff when
needed for activating the user’s status
on an approved research project. Users
can update their contact information in
their account at any time.
Research Project Information
Template. Individuals with valid user
accounts may create a research project
entry in the system by clicking on the
link ‘‘Start a New Proposal.’’ This action
opens a template where the user enters
required information about a research
project he or she wishes to carry out at
a Census Bureau Research Data Center
(RDC). The first page consists of a sixitem prerequisite checklist to which the
user must agree before being allowed to
proceed to the next page. The second
page requests the following information:
project title, requested duration in
months, funding source, Research Data
Center, research personnel (selected
from a list of current user accounts),
brief project description, requested
research datasets supplied by Census,
research datasets supplied by filer,
proposed benefits (from checklist of 13
permitted) and a text box for additional
information the filer wishes to include.
The filer clicks on a continue button to
move to a verification page. The filer
can reset the form contents at any time.
The filer then verifies the entered
information and saves the project
information to the database. The system
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:10 Dec 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
assigns a project number, and sets the
project’s status to NEW.
Research Proposal Documents.
• Abstract—A one-page document
that summarizes the project’s objectives,
describes requested data, and lists
proposed benefits to the Census Bureau.
• Project Narrative—Describes in
detail the research question(s) to be
addressed, Census Bureau and
researcher supplied datasets to be used,
a description of the research design
(methodology, hypotheses, statistical
models), expected duration and
outsomes, source of funding, and a list
of references cited in the text.
• Benefits Statement—Known
formally as the Predominant Purpose
Statement (PPS), this document is
generated in draft form by the system.
It is populated with some standard
language, project title, Principle
Investigator’s name, preselected
benefits, and a list of requested Census
Bureau datasets. This document is
editable by the submitter, primarily to
expand upon the narrative statements
associated with each proposed benefit.
• Annual Progress Report—Required
for projects of three or more years in
duration. Consists of a brief description
of progress to date.
• Post Project Certification—This
document is submtted following
completion of the project and
summarizes the project’s findings in
terms of benefits to the Census Bureau.
It resembles the Predominant Purpose
Statement in form and content except
that it describes how and whether the
project’s proposed benefits were
achieved. Census Bureau staff review
this document and either certify it or
send it back to the submitter for
revision.
Approved research projects have an
average duration of four years.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 60
projects per year.
Estimated Time Per Response: 63
hours annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,780.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$173,625.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Section 9 and Section 23(c).
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78213
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 10, 2010.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–31471 Filed 12–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; 2012 Economic
Census Classification Report for the
Construction, Manufacturing, and
Mining Sectors and Selected
Wholesale Industries
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
SUMMARY:
To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78212-78213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31471]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Center for
Economic Studies Research Proposal Process and Project Management
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Dr. Brian P. Holly, Project Review Coordinator,
Center for Economic Studies, U.S Census Bureau, Room 2K139, 4600 Silver
Hill Road, Washington, DC 20746 (or via the Internet at
brian.p.holly@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The U.S. Census Bureau through its network of Census Research Data
Centers (RDCs) supports and encourages research activity using Census
Bureau microdata to improve Census Bureau programs. The RDCs provide
access to researchers, federal agencies, and other institutions meeting
the requirements of Title 13 United States Code, Section 23(c) to non-
publicly available Census Bureau data files. The Center for Economic
Studies operates the RDC system on behalf of the Census Bureau.
The objective of the Center for Economic Studies (CES) and the
Research Data Centers (RDCs) is to increase the utility and quality of
Census Bureau data products. The external research program supported by
CES and the RDCs increases the quality and utility of Census data in
several ways. First, access to microdata encourages knowledgeable
researchers to become familiar with Census data products and Census
collection methods. More importantly, providing qualified researchers
access to confidential microdata enables research projects that would
not be possible without access to respondent-level information. This
increases the value of data that has been collected. Access to the
microdata also allows for data linking not possible with aggregates,
both cross-survey linkages and longitudinal linkages. These linkages
leverage the value of preexisting data. Creative use of microdata can
address important policy questions without the need for additional data
collections.
In addition, the best means by which the Census Bureau can check on
the quality of the data it collects, edits, and tabulates is to make
its micro records available in a controlled, secure environment to
sophisticated users who, by employing the micro records in the course
of rigorous analysis, will uncover the strengths and weaknesses of the
micro records. Each set of observations is the end result of dozens
upon dozens of decision rules covering definitions, classifications,
coding procedures, processing rules, editing rules, disclosure rules,
and so on. The validity and consequences of all these decision rules
only become evident when the Census Bureau's micro databases are tested
in the course of analysis. Exposing to the light of research the
conceptual and processing assumptions that are embedded in the Census
Bureau's micro databases constitutes a core element in the Census
Bureau's commitment to quality. CES and the RDCs conduct, facilitate,
and support microdata research.
The Proposal Process
Persons wishing to conduct research at a Research Data Center must
submit a research proposal using the CES Web site (https://www.ces.census.gov). Detailed guidelines describe the research proposal
submission process. There are two distinct steps to submit a research
proposal. The first step is the development of a preliminary proposal.
The second step is the submission of a final proposal.
Preliminary Proposal Development
Researchers who wish to develop a proposal to conduct research at
one of the Census Bureau's Research Data Centers (RDC) initially
contact the RDC administrator at the center where the research will be
conducted. The researcher discusses the proposed project with the
administrator to determine whether the research fits with the Bureau's
mission, is feasible, and is likely to provide benefits to Census
Bureau programs under Title 13, Chapter 5 of the U.S. Code. The
researcher registers as a user with CES by opening an account through
the Center's Web site (https://www.ces.census.gov). All researchers must
have a user account in order to submit preliminary and final proposals
to CES.
Working closely with the RDC administrator, researchers develop a
preliminary research proposal that includes information about the
researcher(s), RDC location(s) where the research will be carried out,
purpose of the research, funding source, requested datasets, desired
software, a brief narrative description of the research project and
proposed benefits to the Census Bureau. The researcher enters this
information via the CES on-line proposal management system accessible
on the CES Web site.
Once a preliminary proposal has been submitted, the RDC
administrator reviews it and advises the researcher of any suggestions
for improvement. The administrator must approve the preliminary
proposal before the researcher can submit a final proposal to CES.
Final Proposal Submission
The final proposal consists of three separate documents in Adobe
Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF): (1) Abstract of the proposal,
(2) Project description (full proposal), and (3) Statement of benefits
to the Census Bureau. The submitter uploads the final documents to the
CES management system via his or her user account and submits for
Census Review by clicking on the Submit link button. This locks the
project entry to prevent further edits or document uploads.
Document length varies by type. The abstract is limited to one
page, the
[[Page 78213]]
proposal narrative is limited to fifteen pages single-spaced or thirty
pages double spaced, and the benfits statement can range from five to
as much as twelve pages at the submitter's discretion.
Progress Reports
Each project research team is expected to file annual progress
reports and agrees to submit a final project report called a Post
Project Certification (PPC). The annual progress reports vary in length
and content and have no fixed format. The Post Project Certification
follows a fixed format and is initially generated as a template by the
project management system.
II. Method of Collection
User Account. Individuals create a user account on the CES Project
Management System by visiting the CES Web site (https://www.ces.census.gov/index/php) and click on the ``Register'' link on the
front page. A template appears which requests contact information from
the respondent, including name, mailing address, e-mail address,
telephone, professional affiliation, and citizenship. Some fields are
required and others are voluntary. The information is retained in the
system database and periodically modified by authorized CES staff when
needed for activating the user's status on an approved research
project. Users can update their contact information in their account at
any time.
Research Project Information Template. Individuals with valid user
accounts may create a research project entry in the system by clicking
on the link ``Start a New Proposal.'' This action opens a template
where the user enters required information about a research project he
or she wishes to carry out at a Census Bureau Research Data Center
(RDC). The first page consists of a six-item prerequisite checklist to
which the user must agree before being allowed to proceed to the next
page. The second page requests the following information: project
title, requested duration in months, funding source, Research Data
Center, research personnel (selected from a list of current user
accounts), brief project description, requested research datasets
supplied by Census, research datasets supplied by filer, proposed
benefits (from checklist of 13 permitted) and a text box for additional
information the filer wishes to include. The filer clicks on a continue
button to move to a verification page. The filer can reset the form
contents at any time. The filer then verifies the entered information
and saves the project information to the database. The system assigns a
project number, and sets the project's status to NEW.
Research Proposal Documents.
Abstract--A one-page document that summarizes the
project's objectives, describes requested data, and lists proposed
benefits to the Census Bureau.
Project Narrative--Describes in detail the research
question(s) to be addressed, Census Bureau and researcher supplied
datasets to be used, a description of the research design (methodology,
hypotheses, statistical models), expected duration and outsomes, source
of funding, and a list of references cited in the text.
Benefits Statement--Known formally as the Predominant
Purpose Statement (PPS), this document is generated in draft form by
the system. It is populated with some standard language, project title,
Principle Investigator's name, preselected benefits, and a list of
requested Census Bureau datasets. This document is editable by the
submitter, primarily to expand upon the narrative statements associated
with each proposed benefit.
Annual Progress Report--Required for projects of three or
more years in duration. Consists of a brief description of progress to
date.
Post Project Certification--This document is submtted
following completion of the project and summarizes the project's
findings in terms of benefits to the Census Bureau. It resembles the
Predominant Purpose Statement in form and content except that it
describes how and whether the project's proposed benefits were
achieved. Census Bureau staff review this document and either certify
it or send it back to the submitter for revision.
Approved research projects have an average duration of four years.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 60 projects per year.
Estimated Time Per Response: 63 hours annually.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,780.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $173,625.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section 9 and Section 23(c).
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: December 10, 2010.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31471 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P