Record of Decision for the U.S. Marine Corps East Coast Basing of the F-35B Aircraft, 78229 [2010-31469]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 15, 2010 / Notices
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
• Demolition of existing Columbia
River bridges.
In summary, the new Columbia River
crossing will carry traffic on two
separate pier-supported bridges and will
include a new light rail transit (LRT)
line and improved bicycle/pedestrian
facilities, using a stacked alignment to
reduce the number of in-water piers in
the Columbia River by approximately
one-third. CRC proposes six in-water
pier complexes for a total of 12 piers for
the Columbia River bridges.
CRC proposes to widen the existing I–
5 southbound bridge over North
Portland Harbor, and will add three new
bridges adjacent to the existing bridges.
Starting from the east, these structures
will carry:
• A three-lane northbound collectordistributor (CD) ramp carrying local
traffic;
• Northbound and southbound I–5 on
the widened existing bridge across the
North Portland Harbor;
• A southbound CD ramp carrying
local traffic; and
• LRT combined with a bicycle/
pedestrian path.
Each bridge will have four or five inwater bents, consisting of one to three
drilled shafts. The permanent in-water
piers of both the Columbia River and
North Portland Harbor crossings will be
constructed using drilled shafts, rather
than impact-driven piles. However, the
project will include numerous
temporary in-water structures to support
equipment and materials during the
course of construction which may
require the use of temporary impactdriven piles. These structures will
include work platforms, work bridges,
and tower cranes.
The existing Columbia River bridges
will be demolished after the new
Columbia River bridges have been
constructed and after associated
interchanges are operating. The existing
Columbia River bridges will be
demolished in two stages: (1)
Superstructure demolition and (2)
substructure demolition. In-water
demolition will be accomplished either
within cofferdams or with the use of
diamond wire/wire saw. A full
description of the activities proposed by
CRC is described in the application.
Information Solicited
Interested persons may submit
information, suggestions, and comments
concerning CRC’s request (see
ADDRESSES). All information,
suggestions, and comments related to
CRC’s request and NMFS’ potential
development and implementation of
regulations governing the incidental
taking of marine mammals by CRC will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:10 Dec 14, 2010
Jkt 223001
be considered by NMFS in developing,
if appropriate, regulations governing the
issuance of letters of authorization.
Dated: December 9, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–31528 Filed 12–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for the U.S. Marine
Corps East Coast Basing of the F–35B
Aircraft
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Record of decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States
Code (U.S.C.) Section 4332(2)(c), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA (40 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] parts 1500–1508), the
Department of the Navy (DoN) NEPA
regulations (32 CFR part 775), and the
Marine Corps Environmental
Compliance and Protection Manual,
which is Marine Corps Order P5090.2A
with change 2 (MCO P5090.2A), the
DoN announces its decision to base and
operate 11 operational F–35B Joint
Strike Fighter (JSF) squadrons (up to 16
aircraft per squadron, for a total of 176
aircraft) and one Pilot Training Center
(PTC) (composed of two Fleet
Replacement Squadrons [FRS]) (up to 20
aircraft per squadron, for a total of 40
aircraft) at two locations on the East
Coast of the United States (U.S.). More
specifically, the DoN has decided to
implement Alternative 1, the Preferred
Alternative, which includes basing three
F–35B operational squadrons and the
PTC at Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Beaufort in Beaufort, South
Carolina, and eight operational
squadrons at MCAS Cherry Point in
Havelock, North Carolina. To support
the basing action, the Marine Corps will:
(1) Construct and/or renovate airfield
facilities and infrastructure necessary to
accommodate and maintain the F–35B
squadrons; (2) change personnel to
accommodate squadron staffing; and (3)
conduct F–35B training operations to
attain and maintain proficiency in the
operational employment of the F–35B.
The F–35B aircraft will replace 84
legacy Marine Corps F/A–18A/B/C/D
Hornet and 68 AV–8B Harrier aircraft in
the Second Marine Air Wing (2d MAW)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78229
and the 4th MAW. All practical means
to avoid or minimize environmental
impacts resulting from implementation
of the Preferred Alternative have been
adopted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
complete text of the Record of Decision
is available for public viewing on the
project Web site at https://
www.usmcjsfeast.com along with copies
of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). For further information,
contact the JSF East Coast EIS Project
Manager, Environmental Planning &
Conservation Division (Attn: Linda
Blount); Naval Facilities Engineering
Command Mid-Atlantic, Code EV21;
9742 Maryland Avenue, Z–144, 1st
Floor; Norfolk, VA 23511; 757–341–
0491.
Dated: December 9, 2010.
D. J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–31469 Filed 12–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for the U.S. Marine
Corps West Coast Basing of the F–35B
Aircraft
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Record of decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States
Code (U.S.C.) Section 4332(2)(c), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA (40 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] parts 1500–1508), the
Department of the Navy (DoN) NEPA
regulations (32 CFR part 775), and the
Marine Corps Environmental
Compliance and Protection Manual,
which is Marine Corps Order P5090.2A
with change 2 (MCO P5090.2A), the
DoN announces its decision to base and
operate 11 operational F–35B Joint
Strike Fighter (JSF) squadrons (up to 16
aircraft per squadron, for a total of 176
aircraft), and 1 F–35B Operational Test
and Evaluation (OT&E) squadron (8
aircraft) on the West Coast of the United
States (U.S.). More specifically, the DoN
has decided to implement Alternative 1,
the Preferred Alternative, which
includes basing six F–35B operational
squadrons at Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Miramar in San Diego,
California, and five operational
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31469]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for the U.S. Marine Corps East Coast Basing of
the F-35B Aircraft
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section
4332(2)(c), the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy
(DoN) NEPA regulations (32 CFR part 775), and the Marine Corps
Environmental Compliance and Protection Manual, which is Marine Corps
Order P5090.2A with change 2 (MCO P5090.2A), the DoN announces its
decision to base and operate 11 operational F-35B Joint Strike Fighter
(JSF) squadrons (up to 16 aircraft per squadron, for a total of 176
aircraft) and one Pilot Training Center (PTC) (composed of two Fleet
Replacement Squadrons [FRS]) (up to 20 aircraft per squadron, for a
total of 40 aircraft) at two locations on the East Coast of the United
States (U.S.). More specifically, the DoN has decided to implement
Alternative 1, the Preferred Alternative, which includes basing three
F-35B operational squadrons and the PTC at Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) Beaufort in Beaufort, South Carolina, and eight operational
squadrons at MCAS Cherry Point in Havelock, North Carolina. To support
the basing action, the Marine Corps will: (1) Construct and/or renovate
airfield facilities and infrastructure necessary to accommodate and
maintain the F-35B squadrons; (2) change personnel to accommodate
squadron staffing; and (3) conduct F-35B training operations to attain
and maintain proficiency in the operational employment of the F-35B.
The F-35B aircraft will replace 84 legacy Marine Corps F/A-18A/B/C/D
Hornet and 68 AV-8B Harrier aircraft in the Second Marine Air Wing (2d
MAW) and the 4th MAW. All practical means to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the Preferred
Alternative have been adopted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The complete text of the Record of Decision
is available for public viewing on the project Web site at https://www.usmcjsfeast.com along with copies of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). For further information, contact the JSF East Coast
EIS Project Manager, Environmental Planning & Conservation Division
(Attn: Linda Blount); Naval Facilities Engineering Command Mid-
Atlantic, Code EV21; 9742 Maryland Avenue, Z-144, 1st Floor; Norfolk,
VA 23511; 757-341-0491.
Dated: December 9, 2010.
D. J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31469 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P