Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747 Airplanes, 77793-77795 [2010-31375]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules
alternative methods of compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
Compliance time extensions approved
previously in accordance with AD 2000–11–
06 are not approved as alternative methods
of compliance for the compliance times
required by paragraph (l) of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–31371 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1158; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–125–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to all Model
747 airplanes. The existing AD currently
requires repetitive inspections to detect
damage of the sleeving and wire
bundles of the boost pumps of the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks, and
of the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed); replacement of any damaged
sleeving with new sleeving; and repair
or replacement of any damaged wires
with new wires. For airplanes on which
any burned wires are found, the existing
AD also requires an inspection to detect
damage of the conduit, and replacement
of any damaged conduit with a
serviceable conduit. This proposed AD
would reduce the initial compliance
time and repetitive inspection interval
in the existing AD. This proposed AD
results from fleet information indicating
that the repetitive inspection interval in
the existing AD is too long because
excessive chafing of the sleeving
continues to occur much earlier than
expected between scheduled
inspections. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct abrasion of the
Teflon sleeving and wires in the
bundles of the fuel boost pumps for the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks and of
the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed), which could result in
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
electrical arcing between the wires and
aluminum conduit and consequent fire
or explosion of the fuel tank.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.
regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6506; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77793
to an address listed under the
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–1158; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–125–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
On December 9, 1997, we issued AD
97–26–07, Amendment 39–10250 (62
FR 65352, December 12, 1997), for all
Model 747 airplanes. That AD currently
requires repetitive inspections to detect
damage of the sleeving and wire
bundles of the boost pumps of the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks, and
of the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed); replacement of any damaged
sleeving with new sleeving; and repair
or replacement of any damaged wires
with new wires. For airplanes on which
any burned wires are found, that AD
also requires an inspection to detect
damage of the conduit, and replacement
of any damaged conduit with a
serviceable conduit. That AD resulted
from reports of chafing of the sleeving.
We issued that AD to detect and correct
abrasion of the Teflon sleeving and
wires in the bundles of the fuel boost
pumps for the numbers 1 and 4 main
fuel tanks and of the auxiliary tank
jettison pumps (if installed), which
could result in electrical arcing between
the wires and the aluminum conduit
and consequent fire or explosion of the
fuel tank.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 97–26–07, we
received fleet information from the
manufacturer indicating that excessive
chafing of the sleeving continues to
occur much earlier than expected
between scheduled inspections. Due to
that fact, the manufacturer has revised
the service information to reduce the
repetitive inspection intervals.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision
3, dated March 11, 2010. The service
information reduces the initial
compliance time and repetitive
inspection interval for detecting damage
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
77794
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules
of the sleeving and wire bundles of the
boost pumps of the numbers 1 and 4
main fuel tanks, and of the auxiliary
tank jettison pumps (if installed)
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
747–28A2204, Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997. Revision 1 of this
service bulletin was referred to in AD
97–26–07 as the appropriate source of
service information for accomplishing
the specified actions. The actions
described in Revision 3 of this service
bulletin are essentially the same as
those described in Revision 1 of this
service bulletin.
required actions is $73,100, or $340 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority for This Rulemaking
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to develop on
other airplanes of the same type design.
For this reason, we are proposing this
AD, which would supersede AD 97–26–
07 and would retain the requirements of
the existing AD at reduced compliance
times.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Change to Existing AD
Regulatory Findings
This proposed AD would retain all
requirements of AD 97–26–07. Since AD
97–26–07 was issued, the AD format has
been revised, and certain paragraphs
have been rearranged. As a result, the
corresponding paragraph identifiers
have changed in this proposed AD, as
listed in the following table:
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
Requirement in AD
97-26-07
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
(a) .....................
(b) .....................
(c) .....................
(d) .....................
(e) .....................
(f) ......................
(g) .....................
Corresponding
requirement in
this proposed
AD
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
(g).
(h).
(i).
(j).
(k).
(l).
(m).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
There are about 772 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
215 airplanes of U.S. registry. The new
requirements of this proposed AD add
no additional economic burden. The
current costs for this proposed AD are
repeated below for the convenience of
affected operators.
The actions that are required by AD
97–26–07 and retained in this proposed
AD take about 4 work-hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the currently
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–10250 (62 FR
65352, December 12, 1997) and adding
the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–1158; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–125–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by January 28, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 97–26–07,
Amendment 39–10250.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, –100B, –100B
SUD, –200B, –200C, –200F, –300, –400,
–400D, –400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28: Fuel.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from fleet information
indicating that the repetitive inspection
interval in the existing AD is too long
because excessive chafing of the sleeving
continues to occur much earlier than
expected between scheduled inspections.
The Federal Aviation Administration is
issuing this AD to detect and correct abrasion
of the Teflon sleeving and wires in the
bundles of the fuel boost pumps for the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks and of the
auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if installed),
which could result in electrical arcing
between the wires and aluminum conduit
and consequent fire or explosion of the fuel
tank.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 96–26–
06, Amendment 39–9870
Inspections/Repair or Replace if Necessary
(g) Perform an initial inspection to detect
damage of the sleeving and wire bundles of
the forward and aft boost pumps of the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks, and of the
wire bundles of the auxiliary tank jettison
pumps (if installed), in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, dated
December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3, dated
March 11, 2010, at the time specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable. After the effective date of this AD,
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules
only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204 may be used.
(1) For airplanes having line numbers 001
through 432 inclusive: Inspect within 120
days after January 21, 1997 (the effective date
of AD 96–26–06, amendment 39–9870, which
was superseded by AD 97–26–07).
(2) For airplanes having line numbers 433
and subsequent: Inspect at the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) or
(g)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000
flight cycles or 60,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first; or
(ii) Within 120 days after December 29,
1997 (the effective date of AD 97–26–07).
(h) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 60,000 flight
hours since the last inspection, whichever
occurs first, until the first inspection required
by paragraph (n) of this AD has been
accomplished.
(i) If any damaged sleeving is found, prior
to further flight, replace the sleeving with
new sleeving, in accordance with Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, dated
December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3, dated
March 11, 2010. After the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204 may be used.
(j) If any damaged wire is found, prior to
further flight, repair or replace the wire with
a new wire, in accordance with Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, dated
December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3, dated
March 11, 2010. After the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204 may be used.
(k) If any burned wire is found, prior to
further flight, perform an inspection to detect
damage of the conduit, in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, dated
December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3, dated
March 11, 2010. If any damage is found, prior
to further flight, replace the conduit with a
serviceable conduit, in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, dated
December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated
October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3, dated
March 11, 2010. After the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204 may be used.
(l) For airplanes having line numbers 433
and subsequent: Within 14 days after
accomplishing the initial inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, submit a report
of any damaged sleeving (i.e., holes, breaks,
cuts, splits), damaged wire (i.e., worn or
cracked insulation, exposed conductor,
indication of arcing/burning), or damaged
conduit to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; fax (425) 227–
1181. The report shall include the
information specified in paragraphs (l)(1),
(l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), and (l)(5) of this AD.
Information collection requirements
contained in this regulation have been
approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB
Control Number 2120–0056.
(1) The airplane serial number.
(2) The total hours’ time-in-service
accumulated on the airplane.
(3) The total number of flight cycles
accumulated on the airplane.
(4) A description of any damage found.
(5) The location of where the damaged part
was installed.
(m) For airplanes having line numbers 433
and subsequent: Within 14 days after
accomplishing the initial inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, submit any
damaged part to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
The damaged part shall be tagged to include
the information specified in paragraphs (l)(1),
(l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), and (l)(5) of this AD.
Additionally, operators shall align the inner
sleeving, outer sleeving, and wire as installed
in the airplane, and secure the sleeving and
wiring in place by taping or other means
when submitting the damaged part to the
Manager, Seattle ACO. Information collection
requirements contained in this regulation
have been approved by the OMB under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
New Reduced Inspection Intervals
Repetitive Inspections
(n) Do the next inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD at the time specified
in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2204, Revision 3,
dated March 11, 2010. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15,000
flight hours. Accomplishing the initial
inspection in this paragraph ends the
repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes on which the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD has been
done as of the effective date of this AD: Do
the inspection at the earlier of the times
specified in paragraph (n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Within 15,000 flight hours after the most
recent inspection, or within 6,000 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Within 20,000 flight cycles or 60,000
flight hours after the most recent inspection
required by paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD has not
been done as of the effective date of this AD:
Do the inspection before the accumulation of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77795
15,000 total flight hours, or within 6,000
flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
(o) A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to
this collection of information are mandatory.
Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20591, Attn: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, AES–200.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(p)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Jon
Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6506; fax (425) 917–6590.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 97–26–07, Amendment
39–10250, are approved as alternative
methods of compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
Compliance time extensions approved
previously in accordance with AD 97–26–07,
are not approved as alternative methods of
compliance for the compliance times
required by paragraph (n) of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–31375 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77793-77795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31375]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1158; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-125-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to all Model 747 airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect damage of the
sleeving and wire bundles of the boost pumps of the numbers 1 and 4
main fuel tanks, and of the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed); replacement of any damaged sleeving with new sleeving; and
repair or replacement of any damaged wires with new wires. For
airplanes on which any burned wires are found, the existing AD also
requires an inspection to detect damage of the conduit, and replacement
of any damaged conduit with a serviceable conduit. This proposed AD
would reduce the initial compliance time and repetitive inspection
interval in the existing AD. This proposed AD results from fleet
information indicating that the repetitive inspection interval in the
existing AD is too long because excessive chafing of the sleeving
continues to occur much earlier than expected between scheduled
inspections. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct abrasion of
the Teflon sleeving and wires in the bundles of the fuel boost pumps
for the numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks and of the auxiliary tank
jettison pumps (if installed), which could result in electrical arcing
between the wires and aluminum conduit and consequent fire or explosion
of the fuel tank.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 28,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6506; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1158;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-125-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On December 9, 1997, we issued AD 97-26-07, Amendment 39-10250 (62
FR 65352, December 12, 1997), for all Model 747 airplanes. That AD
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect damage of the
sleeving and wire bundles of the boost pumps of the numbers 1 and 4
main fuel tanks, and of the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed); replacement of any damaged sleeving with new sleeving; and
repair or replacement of any damaged wires with new wires. For
airplanes on which any burned wires are found, that AD also requires an
inspection to detect damage of the conduit, and replacement of any
damaged conduit with a serviceable conduit. That AD resulted from
reports of chafing of the sleeving. We issued that AD to detect and
correct abrasion of the Teflon sleeving and wires in the bundles of the
fuel boost pumps for the numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks and of the
auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if installed), which could result in
electrical arcing between the wires and the aluminum conduit and
consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 97-26-07, we received fleet information from the
manufacturer indicating that excessive chafing of the sleeving
continues to occur much earlier than expected between scheduled
inspections. Due to that fact, the manufacturer has revised the service
information to reduce the repetitive inspection intervals.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2204,
Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010. The service information reduces the
initial compliance time and repetitive inspection interval for
detecting damage
[[Page 77794]]
of the sleeving and wire bundles of the boost pumps of the numbers 1
and 4 main fuel tanks, and of the auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if
installed) specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, Revision
1, dated October 30, 1997. Revision 1 of this service bulletin was
referred to in AD 97-26-07 as the appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the specified actions. The actions
described in Revision 3 of this service bulletin are essentially the
same as those described in Revision 1 of this service bulletin.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to develop on other airplanes of the
same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which
would supersede AD 97-26-07 and would retain the requirements of the
existing AD at reduced compliance times.
Change to Existing AD
This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 97-26-07.
Since AD 97-26-07 was issued, the AD format has been revised, and
certain paragraphs have been rearranged. As a result, the corresponding
paragraph identifiers have changed in this proposed AD, as listed in
the following table:
Revised Paragraph Identifiers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding requirement in
Requirement in AD 97[dash]26[dash]07 this proposed AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
paragraph (a).......................... paragraph (g).
paragraph (b).......................... paragraph (h).
paragraph (c).......................... paragraph (i).
paragraph (d).......................... paragraph (j).
paragraph (e).......................... paragraph (k).
paragraph (f).......................... paragraph (l).
paragraph (g).......................... paragraph (m).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs of Compliance
There are about 772 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 215 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The new requirements of this proposed AD add no
additional economic burden. The current costs for this proposed AD are
repeated below for the convenience of affected operators.
The actions that are required by AD 97-26-07 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 4 work-hours per airplane, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the currently required actions is $73,100, or $340 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-10250 (62 FR
65352, December 12, 1997) and adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-1158; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-125-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January
28, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 97-26-07, Amendment 39-10250.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 747-100, -
100B, -100B SUD, -200B, -200C, -200F, -300, -400, -400D, -400F,
747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from fleet information indicating that the
repetitive inspection interval in the existing AD is too long
because excessive chafing of the sleeving continues to occur much
earlier than expected between scheduled inspections. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct
abrasion of the Teflon sleeving and wires in the bundles of the fuel
boost pumps for the numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks and of the
auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if installed), which could result in
electrical arcing between the wires and aluminum conduit and
consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 96-26-06, Amendment 39-9870
Inspections/Repair or Replace if Necessary
(g) Perform an initial inspection to detect damage of the
sleeving and wire bundles of the forward and aft boost pumps of the
numbers 1 and 4 main fuel tanks, and of the wire bundles of the
auxiliary tank jettison pumps (if installed), in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, dated December 19, 1996, or
Revision 1, dated October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-28A2204, Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010, at the time specified
in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable. After the
effective date of this AD,
[[Page 77795]]
only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2204 may be
used.
(1) For airplanes having line numbers 001 through 432 inclusive:
Inspect within 120 days after January 21, 1997 (the effective date
of AD 96-26-06, amendment 39-9870, which was superseded by AD 97-26-
07).
(2) For airplanes having line numbers 433 and subsequent:
Inspect at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i)
or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 flight cycles or 60,000
flight hours, whichever occurs first; or
(ii) Within 120 days after December 29, 1997 (the effective date
of AD 97-26-07).
(h) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD
at intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 60,000 flight
hours since the last inspection, whichever occurs first, until the
first inspection required by paragraph (n) of this AD has been
accomplished.
(i) If any damaged sleeving is found, prior to further flight,
replace the sleeving with new sleeving, in accordance with Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, dated December 19, 1996, or Revision
1, dated October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
28A2204, Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010. After the effective date
of this AD, only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
28A2204 may be used.
(j) If any damaged wire is found, prior to further flight,
repair or replace the wire with a new wire, in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, dated December 19, 1996, or
Revision 1, dated October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-28A2204, Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010. After the effective
date of this AD, only Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-28A2204 may be used.
(k) If any burned wire is found, prior to further flight,
perform an inspection to detect damage of the conduit, in accordance
with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, dated December 19, 1996,
or Revision 1, dated October 30, 1997; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-28A2204, Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010. If any
damage is found, prior to further flight, replace the conduit with a
serviceable conduit, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28A2204, dated December 19, 1996, or Revision 1, dated October 30,
1997; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2204, Revision 3,
dated March 11, 2010. After the effective date of this AD, only
Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-28A2204 may be used.
(l) For airplanes having line numbers 433 and subsequent: Within
14 days after accomplishing the initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, submit a report of any damaged sleeving
(i.e., holes, breaks, cuts, splits), damaged wire (i.e., worn or
cracked insulation, exposed conductor, indication of arcing/
burning), or damaged conduit to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; fax (425) 227-1181.
The report shall include the information specified in paragraphs
(l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), and (l)(5) of this AD. Information
collection requirements contained in this regulation have been
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
(1) The airplane serial number.
(2) The total hours' time-in-service accumulated on the
airplane.
(3) The total number of flight cycles accumulated on the
airplane.
(4) A description of any damage found.
(5) The location of where the damaged part was installed.
(m) For airplanes having line numbers 433 and subsequent: Within
14 days after accomplishing the initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, submit any damaged part to the Manager,
Seattle ACO. The damaged part shall be tagged to include the
information specified in paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4),
and (l)(5) of this AD. Additionally, operators shall align the inner
sleeving, outer sleeving, and wire as installed in the airplane, and
secure the sleeving and wiring in place by taping or other means
when submitting the damaged part to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Information collection requirements contained in this regulation
have been approved by the OMB under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
New Reduced Inspection Intervals
Repetitive Inspections
(n) Do the next inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD
at the time specified in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
28A2204, Revision 3, dated March 11, 2010. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15,000 flight hours.
Accomplishing the initial inspection in this paragraph ends the
repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes on which the inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD has been done as of the effective date of this AD: Do
the inspection at the earlier of the times specified in paragraph
(n)(1)(i) and (n)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 15,000 flight hours after the most recent inspection,
or within 6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(ii) Within 20,000 flight cycles or 60,000 flight hours after
the most recent inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h) of this
AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which the inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD has not been done as of the effective date of this
AD: Do the inspection before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight
hours, or within 6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
(o) A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(p)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Jon Regimbal, Aerospace
Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6506; fax (425) 917-6590.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 97-26-07,
Amendment 39-10250, are approved as alternative methods of
compliance with the corresponding requirements of this AD.
Compliance time extensions approved previously in accordance with AD
97-26-07, are not approved as alternative methods of compliance for
the compliance times required by paragraph (n) of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31375 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P