Draft Cargoways India (PVT.) LTD. v. DAMCO U.S.A., INC., DAMCO A/S, A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, Glencore LTD., and Allegheny Alloys Trading LP; Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint, 77875-77876 [2010-31346]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Notices
and paper records, documents, and files
that are stored in filing cabinets in the
EB office suites at headquarters and in
field offices.
RETRIEVABILITY:
1. Information in the electronic
database information can be retrieved by
the name(s) of the individual(s) who
filed the complaint(s), the individual
who is subject of the complaint, and by
a unique case number assigned to each
type of activity conducted by the
Bureau, e.g., inspections, audits,
investigations, hearings, due diligence
requests, etc.
2. Information in the central files, e.g.,
paper documents, records, and files,
etc., includes all the other information
pertaining to these complainant
investigations and/or cases, i.e., name,
address, telephone number, etc., and is
maintained for reference and archival
purposes. This information is retrieved
by a unique identification number
assigned to each complainant
investigation and/or case.
SAFEGUARDS:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
The paper files, documents, and
records are stored in file cabinets in
non-public areas in the EB office suites
at headquarters and in field offices. The
file cabinets are locked at the end of
each business day or when not in use.
The electronic records, data, and files
are maintained in the FCC computer
network databases at headquarters and
in the field offices. Access to both the
paper files and the electronic files is
restricted to authorized EB supervisors
and staff. Authorized staff and
contractors in the FCC’s Information
Technology Center (ITC) have access to
the electronic files. Other employees,
interns, and contractors may be granted
access to the paper files and/or the
electronic files on a ‘‘need-to-know’’
basis. The FCC’s computer network
databases are protected by the FCC’s
security protocols, which include
controlled access, passwords, and other
security features. Information resident
on the database servers is backed-up
routinely onto magnetic media. Backup
tapes are stored on-site and at a secured,
off-site location. The information that is
stored in the computer databases in the
EB field offices is protected by similar
security protocols and safeguards.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
The retention schedule for this system
of records has not yet been determined.
No records will be destroyed until a
disposal schedule is approved by the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). [check with
Records Management]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Enforcement Bureau (EB), Federal
Communications Commission (FCC),
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554.
77875
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–31356 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Under the authority granted to heads
of agencies by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), the FCC
has determined (47 CFR Section 0.561)
that this system of records is exempt
from disclosing its notification
procedure for this system of records.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Under the authority granted to heads
of agencies by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), the FCC
has determined (47 CFR Section 0.561)
that this system of records is exempt
from disclosing its record access
procedure for this system of records.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE:
Under the authority granted to heads
of agencies by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), the FCC
has determined (47 CFR Section 0.561)
that this system of records is exempt
from disclosing its contesting record
procedure for this system of records.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Under the authority granted to heads
of agencies by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), the FCC
has determined (47 CFR Section 0.561)
that this system of records is exempt
from disclosing its record sources for
this system of records.
EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE
ACT:
This system of records is exempt from
sections (c)(3), (d), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I),
and (f) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. 552a, and from 47 CFR 0.554–
0.557 of the Commission’s rules. These
provisions concern the notification,
record access, and contesting
procedures described above, and also
the publication of record sources. The
system is exempt from these provisions
because it contains the following types
of information:
1. Investigative material compiled for
law enforcement purposes as defined in
Section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act;
2. Properly classified information,
obtained from another Federal agency
during the course of a personnel
investigation, which pertains to national
defense and foreign policy, as stated in
Section (k)(1) of the Privacy Act; and
3. Investigative material compiled
solely for the purpose of determining
suitability, eligibility, or qualifications
for Federal civilian employment, as
described in Section (k)(5) of the
Privacy Act, as amended.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 10–10]
Draft Cargoways India (PVT.) LTD. v.
DAMCO U.S.A., INC., DAMCO A/S, A.P.
Moller–Maersk A/S, Glencore LTD., and
Allegheny Alloys Trading LP; Notice of
Filing of Amended Complaint
Notice is given that an Amended
Complaint has been filed with the
Federal Maritime Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) by DRAFT
CARGOWAYS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
(‘‘Complainant’’) in this proceeding
against DAMCO USA, INC., DAMCO A/
S, AND A.P. MOLLER–MAERSK A/S
(‘‘Respondent’’) noticed on November
16, 2010 (75 FR 20005). Complainant
asserted in its original complaint that
Respondents violated Sections 8(a)(1),
10(b)(2)(A), 10(b)(11), 10(b)(13) and
10(d)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46
U.S.C. 40501(a)(1), 41104(2) and (11),
41103(a) and 41102(c). Complainant
alleged that Respondents ‘‘invoiced and
attempted to collect amounts from
Complainant for demurrage and
detention’’ on the shipments at issue
and that ‘‘DAMCO A/S’ published tariff
did not contain any demurrage and
detention provisions * * *.’’
Complainant alleged that Respondent
DAMCO US has ‘‘made * * * false
representations, misleading statements
or omissions in a Complaint (* * *)
filed in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia’’
pertaining to the same shipping
transactions. Complainant also alleged
that Respondents ‘‘have repeatedly
utilized a ‘bait and switch’ scheme
* * * in misleading the shipping
public, including DRAFT, * * * by
utilizing DAMCO US, DAMCO A/S, and
MAERSK as interchangeable parts’’ and
that the scheme is a ‘‘practice.’’
Complainant asserted that by using this
scheme Respondents ‘‘knowingly
disclosed, offered, solicited and
received information concerning the
nature, kind, quantity, destination,
shipper, consignee, and routing of the
property * * * without the consent of
DRAFT and us(ed) that information to
the detriment and disadvantage to
DRAFT.’’ Complainant asserted that it
‘‘has lost significant business to
MAERSK generated by its Indian
accounts related to subject shipments.’’
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
77876
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Notices
The Amended Complaint describes
further allegations raised by DAMCO A/
S in the district court proceeding and
makes further allegations indicating that
DAMCO A/S ‘‘by cross-referencing
MAERSK’s demurrage clause in its tariff
violated 46 CFR 520.7(a)(3)’’ and ‘‘by
having two conflicting tariffs violated 46
CFR 520.7(a)(4). Also, the Amended
Complaint adds as parties to this
proceeding, Glencore Ltd. (‘‘Glencore’’)
and Allegheny Alloys Trading LP
(‘‘Allegheny’’), as they were ‘‘the actual
consignees for subject shipments,’’ and
requests that ‘‘[i]f the Commission finds
that DAMCO A/S is entitled to
demurrage/detention’’, Glencore and
Allegheny be found in violation of
Section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act, 46
U.S.C. 41102(a), and be required to
make reparations to Complainant in the
amount of $20,725. The Amended
Complaint does not alter the
Complainant’s original request that the
Commission: compel Respondents to
answer the complaint; find Respondents
DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US and MAERSK
in violation of the Shipping Act; order
Respondents DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US
and MAERSK to make reparations to
Complainant in the amount of $20,725
‘‘for amounts paid for demurrage and
detention’’, and $150,000 for lost
business and clients; pay interest, costs
and attorneys’ fees; order Respondents
DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US and MAERSK
to ‘‘cease and desist in the action filed
in the United States District Court,
Eastern District of Virginia * * * and to
cease and desist in attempting to collect
amounts for demurrage and detention in
the amount of $174,412.50; and impose
any other relief as the Commission
determines to be proper, fair, and just.
Notice is also given that Glencore and
Allegheny are now identified as
Respondents in the caption for this
proceeding.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–31346 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y
(12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a
bank or bank holding company. The
factors that are considered in acting on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
the notices are set forth in paragraph 7
of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than
December 28, 2010.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
(E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200
North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201–
2272:
1. Chandrakant B. Patel, Surekha
Patel, Bipin Patel, Sandhya Patel, and
Chandrakant B. Patel, as trustee of the
following trusts: Sushil Patel 2010
Irrevocable Trust, Rajan Patel 2010
Irrevocable Trust, Shetal Patel 2010
Irrevocable Trust, and Toral
Balakrishnan 2010 Irrevocable Trust
(also known as ‘‘Patel Family Group’’),
all of Irving, Texas; to acquire voting
shares of SBT Bancshares, Inc., and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of State Bank of Texas, both of Dallas,
Texas.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 8, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–31242 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than January 7,
2011.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice
President), 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. Frontier Management, LLC, and
Frontier Holdings, LLC, both in Omaha,
Nebraska; to acquire 100 percent of the
voting shares of ARSEBECO, Inc., and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of Richardson County Bank & Trust
Company, both in Falls City, Nebraska.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 9, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–31302 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Sunshine Act Meeting
Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
TIME AND DATE: 2:30 p.m., Thursday,
December 16, 2010.
PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal
Reserve Board Building, 20th Street
entrance between Constitution Avenue
and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC
20551.
STATUS: Open.
You will be able to view the meeting
via webcast from a link available on the
Board’s Web page at https://
www.federalreserve.gov on the day of
the meeting.
If you plan to attend the open meeting
in person, we ask that you notify us in
advance and provide your name, date of
birth, and social security number (SSN)
or passport number. You may provide
this information by calling (202) 452–
2474 or you may register online. You
may pre-register until close of business
(December 15, 2010). You also will be
asked to provide identifying
information, including a photo ID,
before being admitted to the Board
meeting. The Public Affairs Office must
approve the use of cameras; please call
(202) 452–2955 for further information.
If you need an accommodation for a
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77875-77876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31346]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 10-10]
Draft Cargoways India (PVT.) LTD. v. DAMCO U.S.A., INC., DAMCO A/
S, A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, Glencore LTD., and Allegheny Alloys Trading
LP; Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint
Notice is given that an Amended Complaint has been filed with the
Federal Maritime Commission (``Commission'') by DRAFT CARGOWAYS (INDIA)
PVT. LTD. (``Complainant'') in this proceeding against DAMCO USA, INC.,
DAMCO A/S, AND A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S (``Respondent'') noticed on
November 16, 2010 (75 FR 20005). Complainant asserted in its original
complaint that Respondents violated Sections 8(a)(1), 10(b)(2)(A),
10(b)(11), 10(b)(13) and 10(d)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46
U.S.C. 40501(a)(1), 41104(2) and (11), 41103(a) and 41102(c).
Complainant alleged that Respondents ``invoiced and attempted to
collect amounts from Complainant for demurrage and detention'' on the
shipments at issue and that ``DAMCO A/S' published tariff did not
contain any demurrage and detention provisions * * *.'' Complainant
alleged that Respondent DAMCO US has ``made * * * false
representations, misleading statements or omissions in a Complaint (* *
*) filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia'' pertaining to the same shipping transactions. Complainant
also alleged that Respondents ``have repeatedly utilized a `bait and
switch' scheme * * * in misleading the shipping public, including
DRAFT, * * * by utilizing DAMCO US, DAMCO A/S, and MAERSK as
interchangeable parts'' and that the scheme is a ``practice.''
Complainant asserted that by using this scheme Respondents ``knowingly
disclosed, offered, solicited and received information concerning the
nature, kind, quantity, destination, shipper, consignee, and routing of
the property * * * without the consent of DRAFT and us(ed) that
information to the detriment and disadvantage to DRAFT.'' Complainant
asserted that it ``has lost significant business to MAERSK generated by
its Indian accounts related to subject shipments.''
[[Page 77876]]
The Amended Complaint describes further allegations raised by DAMCO
A/S in the district court proceeding and makes further allegations
indicating that DAMCO A/S ``by cross-referencing MAERSK's demurrage
clause in its tariff violated 46 CFR 520.7(a)(3)'' and ``by having two
conflicting tariffs violated 46 CFR 520.7(a)(4). Also, the Amended
Complaint adds as parties to this proceeding, Glencore Ltd.
(``Glencore'') and Allegheny Alloys Trading LP (``Allegheny''), as they
were ``the actual consignees for subject shipments,'' and requests that
``[i]f the Commission finds that DAMCO A/S is entitled to demurrage/
detention'', Glencore and Allegheny be found in violation of Section
10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41102(a), and be required to
make reparations to Complainant in the amount of $20,725. The Amended
Complaint does not alter the Complainant's original request that the
Commission: compel Respondents to answer the complaint; find
Respondents DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US and MAERSK in violation of the Shipping
Act; order Respondents DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US and MAERSK to make
reparations to Complainant in the amount of $20,725 ``for amounts paid
for demurrage and detention'', and $150,000 for lost business and
clients; pay interest, costs and attorneys' fees; order Respondents
DAMCO A/S, DAMCO US and MAERSK to ``cease and desist in the action
filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
* * * and to cease and desist in attempting to collect amounts for
demurrage and detention in the amount of $174,412.50; and impose any
other relief as the Commission determines to be proper, fair, and just.
Notice is also given that Glencore and Allegheny are now identified
as Respondents in the caption for this proceeding.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31346 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P