National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources, 77760-77762 [2010-31327]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
77760
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 14,
2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action pertaining to Delaware’s
portable fuel containers regulation may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 30, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart I—Delaware
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
Regulation 1141, Section 3.0 to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE DELAWARE SIP
State regulation
(7 DNREC 1100)
Title/subject
*
*
1141 .........................................
*
*
Section 3.0 ...............................
*
*
*
*
EPA approval date
Additional
explanation
*
*
*
*
*
Limiting Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer and Commercial Products
*
Portable Fuel Containers ........
*
*
State effective date
*
*
4/11/10 ....................................
*
*
*
*
12/14/10 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
*
*
*
Final rule; stay for permit
applications.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ACTION:
40 CFR Part 63
[FR Doc. 2010–31220 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
*
SUMMARY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0334; FRL–9238–5]
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Manufacturing Area Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On June 15, 2010, EPA
notified Petitioners that the Agency
intended to initiate the reconsideration
process in response to their request for
reconsideration of certain provisions in
the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Manufacturing Area Sources. Among
the provisions that EPA is reconsidering
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
is a requirement that certain affected
sources obtain a permit. EPA is staying
until March 14, 2011, the requirement
for certain affected sources to comply
with the title V permit program. Because
we believe the reconsideration process
may not be completed within 90 days,
we are also proposing in a separate
notice to stay the provision requiring
certain sources to obtain a permit after
the final reconsideration rule is
published in the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective December 14, 2010, 40
CFR 63.11494(e) of subpart VVVVVV is
stayed until March 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Randy McDonald, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Sector Policies
and Programs Division, Coatings and
Chemicals Group (E143–01),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711,
telephone number: (919) 541–5402; fax
number: (919) 541–0246; e-mail address:
mcdonald.randy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The EPA published final National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Chemical Manufacturing
Area Sources on October 29, 2009. 40
CFR part 63, subpart VVVVVV (74 FR
56008). Included in the final rule was a
new provision requiring any major
source that had installed a control
device on a chemical manufacturing
process unit after November 15, 1990,
and, as a result, became an area source
under CFR 40 part 63, obtain a title V
permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR
part 71. 40 CFR 63.11494(e).
On February 12, 2010, the American
Chemistry Council and the Society of
Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates
(collectively referred to as ‘‘Petitioners’’)
sought reconsideration of six provisions
in the final rule, including the provision
requiring certain sources to obtain a title
V permit. On June 15, 2010, EPA
notified Petitioners that the Agency
intended to initiate the reconsideration
process. EPA also separately notified
Petitioners that the provision requiring
certain sources to obtain a title V permit
was among the provisions for which
EPA would grant reconsideration.
By letter dated October 28, 2010,
Petitioners requested a stay of the
requirement to comply with the title V
permit program, specifically the
requirement to submit a title V permit
application, pending completion of the
reconsideration process. Petitioners
stated in their letter that they were
requesting the stay because, ‘‘under one
interpretation of EPA’s [40 CFR part 70
and 40 CFR part 71] regulations,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
existing sources must file title V permit
applications: October 29, 2010.’’
Petitioners maintained that it would be
unreasonable and inequitable to require
facilities to prepare and submit title V
applications at the same time that EPA
is reconsidering the requirement to
obtain a title V permit. As explained
below, EPA believes that it is
appropriate to stay the effectiveness of
the requirement in 40 CFR 63.11494(e)
for certain sources to obtain a title V
permit during the pendency of the
reconsideration process.
Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 307(d)(7)(B), EPA is staying for
90 days the provision in 40 CFR
63.11494(e) that requires ‘‘[a]ny source
that was a major source and installed a
control device on a CMPU 1 after
November 15, 1990, and, as a result,
became an area source under 40 CFR
part 63 is required to obtain a permit
under 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part
71.’’ This provision was first introduced
in the final rule and represented a
significant change from the proposal.
Facilities had no chance to comment on
this new requirement in the final rule.
We are staying this provision because
both the affected universe of sources
and the substantive requirement could
change as a result of this
reconsideration process. Specifically,
we will be reconsidering whether the
affected sources noted above should be
subject to title V, or whether they
should be exempt from title V
requirements. Because we cannot prejudge the outcome of the
reconsideration process, we think a
limited stay during the duration of the
administrative reconsideration process
is appropriate so that sources are not
incurring the cost associated with
applying for a title V permit in advance
of our final decision on the issue.
EPA believes that it may not be able
to complete the reconsideration process
within the 3-month stay period
authorized in CAA section 307(d)(7)(B).
For this reason, we are also proposing
in a separate notice to stay the provision
requiring certain sources to obtain a
permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR
part 71 until the final reconsideration
rule is published in the Federal
Register.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’
and, therefore, is not subject to review
1 Chemical
PO 00000
manufacturing process unit.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77761
by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). In addition, this action does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4),
or require prior consultation with State
officials, as specified by Executive
Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28,
1993), or involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues,
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Because this action is not subject to
notice-and-comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute, it is not subject to
the regulatory flexibility provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601, et seq.). This action also does not
have Tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045,
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
The requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). EPA’s compliance
with these statutes and Executive
Orders for the underlying rule is
discussed in the October 29, 2009,
Federal Register document.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77762
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this notice and other
required information to the United
States Senate, the United States House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. The stay of these particular
provisions in 40 CFR subpart VVVVVV
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Monitoring,
Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: December 7, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
ACTION:
Final rule.
Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified
BFEs are made final for the
communities listed below. The BFEs
and modified BFEs are the basis for the
floodplain management measures that
each community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being
already in effect in order to qualify or
remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
SUMMARY:
The date of issuance of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing
BFEs and modified BFEs for each
community. This date may be obtained
by contacting the office where the maps
are available for inspection as indicated
in the table below.
DATES:
■
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended as follows:
The final BFEs for each
community are available for inspection
at the office of the Chief Executive
Officer of each community. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
PART 63—[AMENDED]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ADDRESSES:
Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (e-mail)
luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
§ 63.11494
[STAYED IN PART]
2. In § 63.11494, paragraph (e) is
stayed from December 14, 2010 until
March 14, 2011.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–31327 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003]
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Dec 13, 2010
Jkt 223001
The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations
listed below for the modified BFEs for
each community listed. These modified
elevations have been published in
newspapers of local circulation and
ninety (90) days have elapsed since that
publication. The Deputy Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administrator
has resolved any appeals resulting from
this notification.
This final rule is issued in accordance
with section 110 of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104,
and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has
developed criteria for floodplain
management in floodprone areas in
accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Interested lessees and owners of real
property are encouraged to review the
proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM
available at the address cited below for
each community. The BFEs and
modified BFEs are made final in the
communities listed below. Elevations at
selected locations in each community
are shown.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This final rule is categorically excluded
from the requirements of 44 CFR part
10, Environmental Consideration. An
environmental impact assessment has
not been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood
elevation determinations are not within
the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Regulatory Classification. This final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This final rule involves no policies that
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This final rule meets the
applicable standards of Executive Order
12988.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67
Administrative practice and
procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 67—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 67
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
§ 67.11
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 67.11 are amended as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77760-77762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0334; FRL-9238-5]
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; stay for permit applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 15, 2010, EPA notified Petitioners that the Agency
intended to initiate the reconsideration process in response to their
request for reconsideration of certain provisions in the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Manufacturing Area Sources. Among the provisions that EPA is
reconsidering
[[Page 77761]]
is a requirement that certain affected sources obtain a permit. EPA is
staying until March 14, 2011, the requirement for certain affected
sources to comply with the title V permit program. Because we believe
the reconsideration process may not be completed within 90 days, we are
also proposing in a separate notice to stay the provision requiring
certain sources to obtain a permit after the final reconsideration rule
is published in the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective December 14, 2010, 40 CFR 63.11494(e) of subpart
VVVVVV is stayed until March 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy McDonald, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Sector Policies and Programs Division,
Coatings and Chemicals Group (E143-01), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone number: (919) 541-
5402; fax number: (919) 541-0246; e-mail address:
mcdonald.randy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The EPA published final National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources on October 29,
2009. 40 CFR part 63, subpart VVVVVV (74 FR 56008). Included in the
final rule was a new provision requiring any major source that had
installed a control device on a chemical manufacturing process unit
after November 15, 1990, and, as a result, became an area source under
CFR 40 part 63, obtain a title V permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR
part 71. 40 CFR 63.11494(e).
On February 12, 2010, the American Chemistry Council and the
Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates (collectively referred
to as ``Petitioners'') sought reconsideration of six provisions in the
final rule, including the provision requiring certain sources to obtain
a title V permit. On June 15, 2010, EPA notified Petitioners that the
Agency intended to initiate the reconsideration process. EPA also
separately notified Petitioners that the provision requiring certain
sources to obtain a title V permit was among the provisions for which
EPA would grant reconsideration.
By letter dated October 28, 2010, Petitioners requested a stay of
the requirement to comply with the title V permit program, specifically
the requirement to submit a title V permit application, pending
completion of the reconsideration process. Petitioners stated in their
letter that they were requesting the stay because, ``under one
interpretation of EPA's [40 CFR part 70 and 40 CFR part 71]
regulations, existing sources must file title V permit applications:
October 29, 2010.'' Petitioners maintained that it would be
unreasonable and inequitable to require facilities to prepare and
submit title V applications at the same time that EPA is reconsidering
the requirement to obtain a title V permit. As explained below, EPA
believes that it is appropriate to stay the effectiveness of the
requirement in 40 CFR 63.11494(e) for certain sources to obtain a title
V permit during the pendency of the reconsideration process.
Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) section 307(d)(7)(B), EPA is
staying for 90 days the provision in 40 CFR 63.11494(e) that requires
``[a]ny source that was a major source and installed a control device
on a CMPU \1\ after November 15, 1990, and, as a result, became an area
source under 40 CFR part 63 is required to obtain a permit under 40 CFR
part 70 or 40 CFR part 71.'' This provision was first introduced in the
final rule and represented a significant change from the proposal.
Facilities had no chance to comment on this new requirement in the
final rule. We are staying this provision because both the affected
universe of sources and the substantive requirement could change as a
result of this reconsideration process. Specifically, we will be
reconsidering whether the affected sources noted above should be
subject to title V, or whether they should be exempt from title V
requirements. Because we cannot pre-judge the outcome of the
reconsideration process, we think a limited stay during the duration of
the administrative reconsideration process is appropriate so that
sources are not incurring the cost associated with applying for a title
V permit in advance of our final decision on the issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Chemical manufacturing process unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA believes that it may not be able to complete the
reconsideration process within the 3-month stay period authorized in
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). For this reason, we are also proposing in a
separate notice to stay the provision requiring certain sources to
obtain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 40 CFR part 71 until the final
reconsideration rule is published in the Federal Register.
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action,'' and, therefore, is
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). In
addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain
any unfunded mandate as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104-4), or require prior consultation with State
officials, as specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October
28, 1993), or involve special consideration of environmental justice
related issues, as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). Because this action is not subject to notice-and-
comment requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.).
This action also does not have Tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). The
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This action
does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). EPA's
compliance with these statutes and Executive Orders for the underlying
rule is discussed in the October 29, 2009, Federal Register document.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
[[Page 77762]]
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this notice and other required information to the United
States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the
rule in the Federal Register. The stay of these particular provisions
in 40 CFR subpart VVVVVV is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Monitoring, Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: December 7, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Sec. 63.11494 [STAYED IN PART]
0
2. In Sec. 63.11494, paragraph (e) is stayed from December 14, 2010
until March 14, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2010-31327 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
