Special Conditions: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A Helicopter; Installation of a Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS), 77524-77528 [2010-31188]
Download as PDF
77524
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Changes Requested But Not Made
Fortified Cooking Wines—Marsala and
Sherry
Two comments addressed Marsala
and sherry fortified cooking wines. One
comment did not support the listing on
the basis that organic versions of these
cooking wines are commercially
available, but failed to provide
documentation to support this claim.
One comment requested an annotation
to prohibit fortified wines that contain
synthetic sulfites, such as sulfur dioxide
or potassium metabisulfite. The
comment referenced the restriction of
sulfur dioxide to wines that are ‘‘made
with organic grapes’’ in questioning the
legal basis for allowing cooking wines
containing sulfites to be listed on
§ 205.606 and, therefore, to be used to
produce ‘‘organic’’ products.
In its discussion at the May 20–22,
2008 meeting, the NOSB acknowledged
that the manufacturer cited in the
fortified cooking wine petitions did not
add sulfites to its sherry and Marsala
cooking wines. However, the NOSB did
not recommend prohibiting sherry or
Marsala cooking wines which contain
added sulfites. We believe the
recommendation is consistent with
OFPA, § 6510(a)(3), which prohibits the
addition of sulfites except in the
production of wine. Therefore, we are
not adopting the proposed annotation to
prohibit conventional forms of Marsala
and sherry fortified cooking wines
which contain added sulfites.
F. Effective Date
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
This final rule reflects
recommendations submitted to the
Secretary by the NOSB. The substances
being added to the National List were
based on petitions from the industry
and evaluated by the NOSB using
criteria in the Act and the regulations.
Because these substances are crucial to
organic crop production and processing
operations, producers should be able to
use them in their operations as soon as
possible. Accordingly, AMS finds that
good cause exists under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days
after publication in the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 205
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agriculture, Animals,
Archives and records, Imports, Labeling,
Organically produced products, Plants,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seals and insignia, Soil
conservation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Dec 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 205, subpart G is
amended as follows:
PART 205—NATIONAL ORGANIC
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 205 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6522.
2. Section 205.601 is amended by:
A. Adding new paragraph (a)(8);
B. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(2)
through (e)(9) as (e)(3) through (e)(10)
and adding new paragraph (e)(2);
■ C. Redesignating paragraphs (i)(1)
through (i)(11) as (i)(2) through (i)(12)
and adding new paragraph (i)(1); and
■ D. Revising paragraph (m)(2).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed
for use in organic crop production.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(8) Sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate
(CAS #–15630–89–4)—Federal law
restricts the use of this substance in
food crop production to approved food
uses identified on the product label.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) Aqueous potassium silicate (CAS
#–1312–76–1)—the silica, used in the
manufacture of potassium silicate, must
be sourced from naturally occurring
sand.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) Aqueous potassium silicate (CAS
#–1312–76–1)—the silica, used in the
manufacture of potassium silicate, must
be sourced from naturally occurring
sand.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) EPA List 3—Inerts of unknown
toxicity—for use only in passive
pheromone dispensers.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 2. Section 205.605 is amended by
adding one new substance in
alphabetical order to paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic)
substances allowed as ingredients in or on
processed products labeled as ‘‘organic’’ or
‘‘made with organic (specified ingredients
or food group(s)).’’
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Gellan gum (CAS # 71010–52–1)—
high-acyl form only.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 205.606 is amended by:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Redesignating paragraphs (g)
through (t) and (u) through (w) as
paragraphs (h) through (u) and (w)
through (y) respectively;
■ B. Adding new paragraphs (g) and (v)
to read as follows:
■
§ 205.606 Nonorganically produced
agricultural products allowed as ingredients
in or on processed products labeled as
‘‘organic.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Fortified cooking wines.
(1) Marsala.
(2) Sherry.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Tragacanth gum (CAS #–9000–65–
1).
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 7, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–31196 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. SW023; Special Conditions No.
29–023–SC]
Special Conditions: Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation Model S–92A Helicopter;
Installation of a Search and Rescue
(SAR) Automatic Flight Control System
(AFCS)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation (Sikorsky) model S–92A
helicopter. This helicopter, as modified
by Sikorsky, will have novel or unusual
design features associated with
installing an optional SAR AFCS. The
applicable airworthiness standards do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards the
Administrator considers necessary to
show a level of safety equivalent to that
established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is December 3, 2010.
We must receive your comments by
February 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You must mail or deliver
two copies of your comments to: Federal
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Aviation Administration, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Attn: Special Conditions
Docket (ASW–111), Docket No. SW023,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137. You must mark your comments:
Docket No. SW023. You can inspect
comments in the Docket on weekdays,
except Federal holidays, between
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FAA, Aircraft Certification Service,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group (ASW–111), Attn: John
VanHoudt, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817)
222–5167, facsimile (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Background and Discussion
On July 30, 2007, Sikorsky applied for
a change to Type Certificate (TC) No.
R00024BO to install an optional SAR
AFCS in the model S–92A helicopter.
These special conditions were recently
developed due to the intended function
of the S–92A SAR AFCS not being
completely defined until late in the
certification program. The model S–92A
is a transport category helicopter
certified to Category A requirements
when configured for more than nine
passengers and Category A or B
requirements when configured for nine
or less passengers. This helicopter is
also certified for instrument flight under
the requirements of Appendix B of 14
CFR part 29, Amendment 29–47.
The use of dedicated AFCS upper
modes, in which a fully coupled
autopilot provides operational SAR
profiles, is needed for SAR operations
conducted over water in offshore areas
clear of obstructions. The SAR modes
enable the helicopter pilot to fly fully
coupled maneuvers, to include
predefined search patterns during cruise
flight, and to transition from cruise
flight to a stabilized hover and
departure (transition from hover to
cruise flight). The SAR AFCS also
includes an auxiliary crew control that
allows another crewmember (such as a
hoist operator) to have limited authority
to control the helicopter’s longitudinal
and lateral position during hover
operations.
Flight operations conducted over
water at night may have an extremely
limited visual horizon with little visual
reference to the surface even when
conducted under Visual Meteorological
Conditions (VMC). Consequently, the
certification requirements for SAR
modes must meet Appendix B to 14 CFR
part 29. While Appendix B to 14 CFR
part 29 prescribes airworthiness criteria
for instrument flight, it does not
consider operations below instrument
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Dec 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
flight minimum speed (VMINI), whereas
the SAR modes allow for coupled
operations at low speed, all-azimuth
flight to zero airspeed (hover).
Since SAR operations have
traditionally been a public use mission,
the use of SAR modes in civil
operations requires special
airworthiness standards (special
conditions) to ensure that a level of
safety consistent with Category A and
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
certification is maintained. In this
regard, 14 CFR part 29 lacks adequate
airworthiness standards for AFCS SAR
mode certification to include flight
characteristics, performance, and
installed equipment and systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.101, Sikorsky must
show the S–92A, as changed, continues
to meet the applicable provisions of the
rules incorporated by reference in TC
No. R00024BO or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
the TC are commonly referred to as the
‘‘original type certification basis.’’ The
regulations incorporated by reference in
R00024BO are as follows:
(a) 14 CFR part 29 Amendments 29–
1 to 29–47, inclusive.
(b) 14 CFR part 36 Amendment 20.
(c) Equivalent Safety Findings:
(1) Number TC0309BO–R/F–1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.173 Static longitudinal
stability.
(ii) 14 CFR 29.175 Demonstration of
static longitudinal stability.
(2) Number TC0309BO–R/F–4.
(i) 14 CFR 29.177 Static directional
stability.
(3) Number TC0309BO–R/P–1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1305(a)(24) Power Plant
Instruments.
(4) Number TC0309BO–R/P–5.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1181(a)(4) Designated
Fire Zones; Regions Included.
(d) Special Conditions:
(1) No. 29–011–SC for Dual-Engine 30
Minute Power.
(2) No. 29–008–SC for High Intensity
Radiated Frequency.
(e) Noise Control Act of 1972.
(f) Compliance with the following
optional requirements has been
established: Ditching provisions
§ 29.563 including §§ 29.801 and
29.807(d), and excluding §§ 29.1411,
29.1415, and 29.1561 when emergency
flotation system is installed. For
extended over-water operations,
compliance with the operating rules and
§§ 29.1411, 29.1415, and 29.1561 must
be shown.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness standards and special
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77525
conditions, the Sikorsky model S–92A
must comply with the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Regulatory Basis for Special Conditions
If the Administrator finds the
applicable airworthiness standards (that
is, 14 CFR part 29) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Sikorsky model S–92A
helicopter because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under § 21.16.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the TC for that model
be amended later to include any other
model that incorporates the same novel
or unusual design feature, or should any
other model already included on the
same TC be modified to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Sikorsky model S–92A helicopter
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features:
The SAR system is composed of a
navigation computer with SAR modes,
an AFCS that provides coupled SAR
functions, hoist operator control, a
hover speed reference system, and two
radio altimeters. The AFCS coupled
SAR functions include:
(a) Hover hold at selected height
above the surface.
(b) Ground speed hold.
(c) Transition down and hover to a
waypoint under guidance from the
navigation computer.
(d) SAR pattern, transition down, and
hover near a target over which the
helicopter has flown.
(e) Transition up, climb, and capture
a cruise height.
(f) Capture and track SAR search
patterns generated by the navigation
computer.
(g) Monitor the preselected hover
height with automatic increase in
collective if the aircraft height drops
below the safe minimum height.
These SAR modes are intended to be
used over large bodies of water in areas
clear of obstructions. Further, use of the
modes that transition down from cruise
to hover will include operation at
airspeeds below VMINI.
The SAR system only entails
navigation, flight control, and coupled
AFCS operation of the helicopter. The
system does not include the extra
equipment that may be required for over
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
77526
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
water flight or external loads to meet
other operational requirements.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will file in the special conditions
docket all comments we receive, as well
as a report summarizing each
substantive public contact with FAA
personnel about these special
conditions. You can inspect the docket
before and after the comment closing
date. If you wish to review the docket
in person, go to the address in the
ADDRESSES section of this document
between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring additional expense or
delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
If you want us to let you know we
received your mailed comments on
these special conditions, send us a preaddressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will
stamp the date on the postcard and mail
it back to you.
Conclusion
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of helicopter. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
Normally, in adopting special
conditions, the FAA provides notice
and an opportunity for comment before
issuing the final special conditions.
However, because the delivery date of
the Sikorsky model S–92A helicopter is
imminent, we find that it is
impracticable to provide prior notice
because a delay would be contrary to
the public interest. The FAA therefore
finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Applicability
These special conditions apply to the
Sikorsky model S–92A helicopters.
Should Sikorsky apply at a later date for
a change to the TC to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Dec 10, 2010
Aircraft, Aviation safety.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Jkt 223001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation model S–92A helicopters
when the optional Search and Rescue
(SAR) Automatic Flight Control System
(AFCS) is installed:
In addition to the part 29 certification
requirements for Category A and
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B), the following additional
requirements must be met for
certification of the SAR AFCS:
(a) SAR Flight Modes. The coupled
SAR flight modes must provide:
(1) Safe and controlled flight in three
axes (lateral and longitudinal position/
speed and height/vertical speed) at all
airspeeds from instrument flight
minimum speed (VMINI) to a hover
(within the maximum demonstrated
wind envelope).
(2) Automatic transition to the
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B) envelope as part of the normal SAR
mode sequencing.
(3) A pilot-selectable Go-Around
mode that safely interrupts any other
coupled mode and automatically
transitions to the helicopter instrument
flight (Appendix B) envelope.
(4) A means to prevent unintended
flight below a safe minimum height.
Pilot-commanded descent below the
safe minimum height is acceptable
provided the alerting requirements in
(b)(7)(i) are sufficient to alert the pilot
of this descent below safe minimum
height.
(b) SAR Mode System Architecture.
To support the integrity of the SAR
modes, the following system
architecture is required:
(1) A system for limiting the engine
power demanded by the AFCS when
any of the automatic piloting modes are
engaged, so FADEC power limitations,
such as torque and temperature, are not
exceeded.
(2) A system providing the aircraft
height above the surface and final pilotselected height at a location on the
instrument panel in a position
acceptable to the FAA that will make it
plainly visible to and usable by any
pilot at their station.
(3) A system providing the aircraft
heading and the pilot-selected heading
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
at a location on the instrument panel in
a position acceptable to the FAA that
will make it plainly visible to and
usable by any pilot at their station.
(4) A system providing the aircraft
longitudinal and lateral ground speeds
and the pilot-selected longitudinal and
lateral ground speeds when used by the
AFCS in the flight envelope where
airspeed indications become unreliable.
This information must be presented at a
location on the instrument panel in a
position acceptable to the FAA that is
plainly visible to and usable by any
pilot at their station.
(5) A system providing wind speed
and wind direction when automatic
piloting modes are engaged or
transitioning from one mode to another.
(6) A system that monitors for flight
guidance deviations and failures with
an appropriate alerting function that
enables the flight crew to take
appropriate corrective action.
(7) The alerting system must provide
visual or aural alerts, or both, to the
flight crew under any of the following
conditions:
(i) When the stored or pilot-selected
safe minimum height is reached.
(ii) When a SAR mode system
malfunction occurs.
(iii) When the AFCS changes modes
automatically from one SAR mode to
another.
Note: For normal transitions from one SAR
mode to another, a single visual or aural alert
may suffice. For a SAR mode malfunction or
a mode having a time-critical component, the
flight crew alerting system must activate
early enough to allow the flight crew to take
timely and appropriate action. The alerting
system means must be designed to alert the
flight crew in order to minimize crew errors
that could create an additional hazard.
(8) The SAR system hoist operator
control is considered a flight control
with limited authority and must comply
with the following:
(i) The hoist operator control must be
designed and located to provide for
convenient operation and to prevent
confusion and inadvertent operation.
(ii) The helicopter must be safely
controllable by the hoist operator
control throughout the range of that
control.
(iii) The hoist operator control may
not interfere with the safe operation of
the helicopter.
(iv) Pilot and copilot flight controls
must be able to smoothly override the
control authority of the hoist operator
control, without exceptional piloting
skill, alertness, or strength, and without
the danger of exceeding any other
limitation because of the override.
(9) The reliability of the AFCS must
be related to the effects of its failure.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
The occurrence of any failure condition
that would prevent continued safe flight
and landing must be extremely
improbable. For any failure condition of
the AFCS which is not shown to be
extremely improbable:
(i) The helicopter must be safely
controllable and capable of continued
safe flight without exceptional piloting
skill, alertness, or strength. Additional
unrelated probable failures affecting the
control system must be evaluated.
(ii) The AFCS must be designed so
that it cannot create a hazardous
deviation in the flight path or produce
hazardous loads on the helicopter
during normal operation or in the event
of a malfunction or failure, assuming
corrective action begins within an
appropriate period of time. Where
multiple systems are installed,
subsequent malfunction conditions
must be evaluated in sequence unless
their occurrence is shown to be
improbable.
(10) A functional hazard assessment
(FHA) and a system safety assessment
must be provided to address the failure
conditions associated with SAR
operations. For SAR catastrophic failure
conditions, changes may be required to
the following:
(i) System architecture.
(ii) Software and complex electronic
hardware design assurance levels.
(iii) HIRF test levels.
(iv) Instructions for continued
airworthiness.
The assessments must consider all the
systems required for SAR operations to
include the AFCS, all associated AFCS
sensors (for example, radio altimeter),
and primary flight displays. Electrical
and electronic systems with SAR
catastrophic failure conditions (for
example, AFCS) must comply with the
§ 29.1317(a)(4) High Intensity Radiated
Field (HIRF) requirements.
(c) SAR Mode Performance
Requirements.
(1) The SAR modes must be
demonstrated in the requested flight
envelope for the following minimum
sea-state and wind conditions:
(i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5
meters (8.2 feet), considering both short
and long swells.
(ii) Wind: 25 knots headwind; 17
knots for all other azimuths.
(2) The selected hover height and
hover velocity must be captured (to
include the transition from one captured
mode to another captured mode)
accurately and smoothly and not exhibit
any significant overshoot or oscillation.
(3) For any single failure or any
combination of failures of the AFCS that
is not shown to be extremely
improbable, the recovery must not result
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Dec 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
in a loss of height greater than half of
the minimum use height (MUH) with a
minimum margin of 15 feet above the
surface. MUH is the minimum height at
which any SAR AFCS mode can be
engaged.
(4) The SAR mode system must be
usable up to the maximum certified
gross weight of the aircraft or to the
lower of the following weights:
(i) Maximum emergency flotation
weight.
(ii) Maximum hover Out-of-Ground
Effect (OGE) weight.
(iii) Maximum demonstrated weight.
(d) Flight Characteristics.
(1) The basic aircraft must meet all the
part 29 airworthiness criteria for
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B).
(2) For SAR mode coupled flight
below VMINI, at the maximum
demonstrated winds, the helicopter
must be able to maintain any required
flight condition and make a smooth
transition from any flight condition to
any other flight condition without
requiring exceptional piloting skill,
alertness, or strength, and without
exceeding the limit load factor. This
requirement also includes aircraft
control through the hoist operator’s
control.
(3) For SAR modes at airspeeds below
VMINI the following requirements of
Appendix B to part 29 must be met and
will be used as an extension to the IFR
certification envelope of the basic
aircraft:
(i) Static Longitudinal Stability: the
requirements of paragraph IV of
Appendix B are not applicable.
(ii) Static Lateral-Directional Stability:
The requirements of paragraph V of
Appendix B are not applicable.
(iii) Dynamic Stability: The
requirements of paragraph VI of
Appendix B are replaced with the
following two paragraphs:
(A) Any oscillation must be damped
and any aperiodic response must not
double in amplitude in less than 10
seconds. This requirement must also be
met with degraded upper mode(s) of the
AFCS. An ‘‘upper mode’’ is a mode that
utilizes a fully coupled autopilot to
provide an operational SAR profile.
(B) After any upset, the AFCS must
return the aircraft to the last
commanded position within 10 seconds
or less.
(4) With any of the upper mode(s) of
the AFCS engaged the pilot must be able
to manually recover the aircraft and
transition to the normal (Appendix B)
IFR flight profile envelope without
exceptional skill, alertness, or strength.
(e) One-Engine Inoperative (OEI)
Performance Information.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77527
(1) The following performance
information must be provided in the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement
(RFMS):
(i) OEI performance information and
emergency procedures, providing the
maximum weight that will provide a
minimum clearance of 15 feet above the
surface, following failure of the critical
engine in a hover. The maximum weight
must be presented as a function of the
hover height for the temperature and
pressure altitude range requested for
certification. The effects of wind must
be reflected in the hover performance
information.
(ii) Hover OGE performance with the
critical engine inoperative for OEI
continuous and time-limited power
ratings for those weights, altitudes, and
temperatures for which certification is
requested.
Note: These OEI performance requirements
do not replace performance requirements that
may be needed to comply with the
airworthiness or operational standards
(§ 29.865 or 14 CFR part 133) for external
loads or human external cargo.
(f) RFMS.
(1) The RFMS must contain, at a
minimum:
(i) Limitations necessary for safe
operation of the SAR system to include:
(A) Minimum crew requirements.
(B) Maximum SAR weight.
(C) Engagement criteria for each of the
SAR modes to include MUH (as
determined in subparagraph (c)(3)).
(ii) Normal and emergency procedures
for operation of the SAR system (to
include operation of the hoist operator
control), with AFCS failure modes,
AFCS degraded modes, and engine
failures.
(iii) Performance information:
(A) OEI performance and height-loss.
(B) Hover OGE performance
information, utilizing OEI continuous
and time-limited power ratings.
(C) The maximum wind envelope
demonstrated in flight test.
(g) Flight Demonstration.
(1) Before approval of the SAR
system, an acceptable flight
demonstration of all the coupled SAR
modes is required.
(2) The AFCS must provide fail-safe
operations during coupled maneuvers.
The demonstration of fail-safe
operations must include a pilot
workload assessment associated with
manually flying the aircraft to an
altitude greater than 200 feet above the
surface and an airspeed of at least the
best rate of climb airspeed (Vy).
(3) For any failure condition of the
SAR system not shown to be extremely
improbable, the pilot must be able to
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
77528
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 238 / Monday, December 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
make a smooth transition from one
flight mode to another without
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength.
(4) Failure conditions that are not
shown to be extremely improbable must
be demonstrated by analysis, ground
testing, or flight testing. For failures
demonstrated in flight, the following
normal pilot recovery times are
acceptable:
(i) Transition modes (Cruise-to-Hover/
Hover-to-Cruise) and Hover modes:
Normal pilot recognition plus 1 second.
(ii) Cruise modes: Normal pilot
recognition plus 3 seconds.
(5) All AFCS malfunctions must
include evaluation at the low-speed and
high-power flight conditions typical of
SAR operations. Additionally, AFCS
hard-over, slow-over, and oscillatory
malfunctions, particularly in yaw,
require evaluation. AFCS malfunction
testing must include a single or a
combination of failures (for example,
erroneous data from and loss of the
radio altimeter, attitude, heading, and
altitude sensors) which are not shown to
be extremely improbable.
(6) The flight demonstration must
include the following environmental
conditions:
(i) Swell into wind.
(ii) Swell and wind from different
directions.
(iii) Cross swell.
(iv) Swell of different lengths (short
and long swell).
Electronic Access
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December
3, 2010.
Kimberly K. Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
This Federal Register document is
also accessible at the Web site of the
Office of the Federal Register: https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
[FR Doc. 2010–31188 Filed 12–10–10; 8:45 am]
Background
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
A final rule to establish protective
regulations under section 4(d) of the
ESA for the Southern DPS was
published in the Federal Register on
June 2, 2010 (75 FR 30714) (the final
ESA 4(d) Rule). The final ESA 4(d) Rule,
other than the collection-of-information
requirements, went into effect on July 2,
2010. When the final rule was
published, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) had not yet approved
the collection-of-information
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), and therefore the
effective date of the permitting and
reporting requirements in that rule was
delayed. No public comments were
received regarding the permitting and
reporting requirements in the final ESA
4(d) Rule.
OMB approved the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
the final ESA 4(d) Rule on October 5,
2010. Accordingly, this final rule
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 902
[Docket No. 070910507–0576–03]
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
RIN 0648–AV94
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants: Final Rulemaking To
Establish Take Prohibitions for the
Threatened Southern Distinct
Population Segment of North American
Green Sturgeon; Permit and Reporting
Requirements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:40 Dec 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
Final rule; approval of
collection-of-information requirements.
ACTION:
NMFS announces the
approval of collection-of-information
requirements contained in protective
regulations established under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the
threatened Southern Distinct Population
Segment of North American green
sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris;
hereafter, Southern DPS). The intent of
this final rule is to inform the public of
the permitting and reporting
requirements.
SUMMARY:
The amendment to 15 CFR 902.1
is effective January 12, 2011. The
collection-of-information requirements
in 50 CFR 223.210 are approved on
January 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
this final rule may be submitted to the
Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division,
Southwest Region (SWR), NMFS, 501
West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802–4213, and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
or fax to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Neuman, NMFS SWR, 562–
980–4115.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
announces the approval January 12,
2011 of the collection-of-information
requirements at 50 CFR 223.210, as
published in the final ESA 4(d) Rule.
Under NOAA Administrative Order
205–11, dated December 17, 1990, the
Under Secretary for Oceans and
Atmosphere has delegated authority to
sign material for publication in the
Federal Register to the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
This final rule concerns the following
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA and approved by
OMB under control number 0648–0613:
(1) Exception for Federal, State, or
private-sponsored research or
monitoring—written notification
regarding Federal, State, or privatesponsored research or monitoring
activities that meet the exception
criteria in the ESA 4(d) Rule, to be
submitted at least 60 days prior to the
start of the research or monitoring
activities, and regular reports
summarizing project results and total
numbers of takes of ESA listed species,
to be submitted on a schedule to be
determined by NMFS; (2) Exception for
habitat restoration activities—written
notification regarding habitat restoration
activities that meet the exception
criteria in the ESA 4(d) Rule, to be
submitted at least 60 days prior to the
start of the restoration project, and
regular progress reports to be submitted
on a schedule to be determined by
NMFS; (3) Exception for emergency fish
rescue activities—written reports
regarding emergency fish rescue
activities conducted under the ESA 4(d)
Rule exception, to be submitted within
30 days after conducting emergency fish
rescue activities; (4) Fishery
Management and Evaluation Plans
(FMEPs) for NMFS review and approval
and biannual reports providing the
number of green sturgeon taken in the
fishery and an evaluation and summary
of the effectiveness of the FMEP; (5)
Tribal Fishery Management Plans
(TFMPs) for NMFS review and
approval; and (6) State ESA 4(d)
research programs for NMFS review and
approval and annual reports
summarizing project results and the
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77524-77528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31188]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. SW023; Special Conditions No. 29-023-SC]
Special Conditions: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A
Helicopter; Installation of a Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight
Control System (AFCS)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation (Sikorsky) model S-92A helicopter. This helicopter, as
modified by Sikorsky, will have novel or unusual design features
associated with installing an optional SAR AFCS. The applicable
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to
show a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is December 3,
2010. We must receive your comments by February 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You must mail or deliver two copies of your comments to:
Federal
[[Page 77525]]
Aviation Administration, Rotorcraft Directorate, Attn: Special
Conditions Docket (ASW-111), Docket No. SW023, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137. You must mark your comments: Docket No. SW023. You
can inspect comments in the Docket on weekdays, except Federal
holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FAA, Aircraft Certification Service,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group (ASW-111), Attn:
John VanHoudt, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5167, facsimile (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Discussion
On July 30, 2007, Sikorsky applied for a change to Type Certificate
(TC) No. R00024BO to install an optional SAR AFCS in the model S-92A
helicopter. These special conditions were recently developed due to the
intended function of the S-92A SAR AFCS not being completely defined
until late in the certification program. The model S-92A is a transport
category helicopter certified to Category A requirements when
configured for more than nine passengers and Category A or B
requirements when configured for nine or less passengers. This
helicopter is also certified for instrument flight under the
requirements of Appendix B of 14 CFR part 29, Amendment 29-47.
The use of dedicated AFCS upper modes, in which a fully coupled
autopilot provides operational SAR profiles, is needed for SAR
operations conducted over water in offshore areas clear of
obstructions. The SAR modes enable the helicopter pilot to fly fully
coupled maneuvers, to include predefined search patterns during cruise
flight, and to transition from cruise flight to a stabilized hover and
departure (transition from hover to cruise flight). The SAR AFCS also
includes an auxiliary crew control that allows another crewmember (such
as a hoist operator) to have limited authority to control the
helicopter's longitudinal and lateral position during hover operations.
Flight operations conducted over water at night may have an
extremely limited visual horizon with little visual reference to the
surface even when conducted under Visual Meteorological Conditions
(VMC). Consequently, the certification requirements for SAR modes must
meet Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29. While Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29
prescribes airworthiness criteria for instrument flight, it does not
consider operations below instrument flight minimum speed
(VMINI), whereas the SAR modes allow for coupled operations
at low speed, all-azimuth flight to zero airspeed (hover).
Since SAR operations have traditionally been a public use mission,
the use of SAR modes in civil operations requires special airworthiness
standards (special conditions) to ensure that a level of safety
consistent with Category A and Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
certification is maintained. In this regard, 14 CFR part 29 lacks
adequate airworthiness standards for AFCS SAR mode certification to
include flight characteristics, performance, and installed equipment
and systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.101, Sikorsky must show the S-92A, as changed,
continues to meet the applicable provisions of the rules incorporated
by reference in TC No. R00024BO or the applicable regulations in effect
on the date of application for the change. The regulations incorporated
by reference in the TC are commonly referred to as the ``original type
certification basis.'' The regulations incorporated by reference in
R00024BO are as follows:
(a) 14 CFR part 29 Amendments 29-1 to 29-47, inclusive.
(b) 14 CFR part 36 Amendment 20.
(c) Equivalent Safety Findings:
(1) Number TC0309BO-R/F-1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.173 Static longitudinal stability.
(ii) 14 CFR 29.175 Demonstration of static longitudinal stability.
(2) Number TC0309BO-R/F-4.
(i) 14 CFR 29.177 Static directional stability.
(3) Number TC0309BO-R/P-1.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1305(a)(24) Power Plant Instruments.
(4) Number TC0309BO-R/P-5.
(i) 14 CFR 29.1181(a)(4) Designated Fire Zones; Regions Included.
(d) Special Conditions:
(1) No. 29-011-SC for Dual-Engine 30 Minute Power.
(2) No. 29-008-SC for High Intensity Radiated Frequency.
(e) Noise Control Act of 1972.
(f) Compliance with the following optional requirements has been
established: Ditching provisions Sec. 29.563 including Sec. Sec.
29.801 and 29.807(d), and excluding Sec. Sec. 29.1411, 29.1415, and
29.1561 when emergency flotation system is installed. For extended
over-water operations, compliance with the operating rules and
Sec. Sec. 29.1411, 29.1415, and 29.1561 must be shown.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness standards and special
conditions, the Sikorsky model S-92A must comply with the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Regulatory Basis for Special Conditions
If the Administrator finds the applicable airworthiness standards
(that is, 14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the Sikorsky model S-92A helicopter because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under Sec.
21.16.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the TC for that model be amended later to
include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other model already included on the same
TC be modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Sikorsky model S-92A helicopter will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
The SAR system is composed of a navigation computer with SAR modes,
an AFCS that provides coupled SAR functions, hoist operator control, a
hover speed reference system, and two radio altimeters. The AFCS
coupled SAR functions include:
(a) Hover hold at selected height above the surface.
(b) Ground speed hold.
(c) Transition down and hover to a waypoint under guidance from the
navigation computer.
(d) SAR pattern, transition down, and hover near a target over
which the helicopter has flown.
(e) Transition up, climb, and capture a cruise height.
(f) Capture and track SAR search patterns generated by the
navigation computer.
(g) Monitor the preselected hover height with automatic increase in
collective if the aircraft height drops below the safe minimum height.
These SAR modes are intended to be used over large bodies of water
in areas clear of obstructions. Further, use of the modes that
transition down from cruise to hover will include operation at
airspeeds below VMINI.
The SAR system only entails navigation, flight control, and coupled
AFCS operation of the helicopter. The system does not include the extra
equipment that may be required for over
[[Page 77526]]
water flight or external loads to meet other operational requirements.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will file in the special conditions docket all comments we
receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel about these special conditions. You can
inspect the docket before and after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES
section of this document between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring additional expense or delay. We may change these
special conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your mailed comments on
these special conditions, send us a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard
and mail it back to you.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of helicopter. It is not a rule of general applicability.
Normally, in adopting special conditions, the FAA provides notice
and an opportunity for comment before issuing the final special
conditions. However, because the delivery date of the Sikorsky model S-
92A helicopter is imminent, we find that it is impracticable to provide
prior notice because a delay would be contrary to the public interest.
The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
Applicability
These special conditions apply to the Sikorsky model S-92A
helicopters. Should Sikorsky apply at a later date for a change to the
TC to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions would apply to that model as
well.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation model S-
92A helicopters when the optional Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic
Flight Control System (AFCS) is installed:
In addition to the part 29 certification requirements for Category
A and helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B), the following
additional requirements must be met for certification of the SAR AFCS:
(a) SAR Flight Modes. The coupled SAR flight modes must provide:
(1) Safe and controlled flight in three axes (lateral and
longitudinal position/speed and height/vertical speed) at all airspeeds
from instrument flight minimum speed (VMINI) to a hover
(within the maximum demonstrated wind envelope).
(2) Automatic transition to the helicopter instrument flight
(Appendix B) envelope as part of the normal SAR mode sequencing.
(3) A pilot-selectable Go-Around mode that safely interrupts any
other coupled mode and automatically transitions to the helicopter
instrument flight (Appendix B) envelope.
(4) A means to prevent unintended flight below a safe minimum
height. Pilot-commanded descent below the safe minimum height is
acceptable provided the alerting requirements in (b)(7)(i) are
sufficient to alert the pilot of this descent below safe minimum
height.
(b) SAR Mode System Architecture. To support the integrity of the
SAR modes, the following system architecture is required:
(1) A system for limiting the engine power demanded by the AFCS
when any of the automatic piloting modes are engaged, so FADEC power
limitations, such as torque and temperature, are not exceeded.
(2) A system providing the aircraft height above the surface and
final pilot-selected height at a location on the instrument panel in a
position acceptable to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and
usable by any pilot at their station.
(3) A system providing the aircraft heading and the pilot-selected
heading at a location on the instrument panel in a position acceptable
to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and usable by any pilot
at their station.
(4) A system providing the aircraft longitudinal and lateral ground
speeds and the pilot-selected longitudinal and lateral ground speeds
when used by the AFCS in the flight envelope where airspeed indications
become unreliable. This information must be presented at a location on
the instrument panel in a position acceptable to the FAA that is
plainly visible to and usable by any pilot at their station.
(5) A system providing wind speed and wind direction when automatic
piloting modes are engaged or transitioning from one mode to another.
(6) A system that monitors for flight guidance deviations and
failures with an appropriate alerting function that enables the flight
crew to take appropriate corrective action.
(7) The alerting system must provide visual or aural alerts, or
both, to the flight crew under any of the following conditions:
(i) When the stored or pilot-selected safe minimum height is
reached.
(ii) When a SAR mode system malfunction occurs.
(iii) When the AFCS changes modes automatically from one SAR mode
to another.
Note: For normal transitions from one SAR mode to another, a
single visual or aural alert may suffice. For a SAR mode malfunction
or a mode having a time-critical component, the flight crew alerting
system must activate early enough to allow the flight crew to take
timely and appropriate action. The alerting system means must be
designed to alert the flight crew in order to minimize crew errors
that could create an additional hazard.
(8) The SAR system hoist operator control is considered a flight
control with limited authority and must comply with the following:
(i) The hoist operator control must be designed and located to
provide for convenient operation and to prevent confusion and
inadvertent operation.
(ii) The helicopter must be safely controllable by the hoist
operator control throughout the range of that control.
(iii) The hoist operator control may not interfere with the safe
operation of the helicopter.
(iv) Pilot and copilot flight controls must be able to smoothly
override the control authority of the hoist operator control, without
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without the
danger of exceeding any other limitation because of the override.
(9) The reliability of the AFCS must be related to the effects of
its failure.
[[Page 77527]]
The occurrence of any failure condition that would prevent continued
safe flight and landing must be extremely improbable. For any failure
condition of the AFCS which is not shown to be extremely improbable:
(i) The helicopter must be safely controllable and capable of
continued safe flight without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength. Additional unrelated probable failures affecting the control
system must be evaluated.
(ii) The AFCS must be designed so that it cannot create a hazardous
deviation in the flight path or produce hazardous loads on the
helicopter during normal operation or in the event of a malfunction or
failure, assuming corrective action begins within an appropriate period
of time. Where multiple systems are installed, subsequent malfunction
conditions must be evaluated in sequence unless their occurrence is
shown to be improbable.
(10) A functional hazard assessment (FHA) and a system safety
assessment must be provided to address the failure conditions
associated with SAR operations. For SAR catastrophic failure
conditions, changes may be required to the following:
(i) System architecture.
(ii) Software and complex electronic hardware design assurance
levels.
(iii) HIRF test levels.
(iv) Instructions for continued airworthiness.
The assessments must consider all the systems required for SAR
operations to include the AFCS, all associated AFCS sensors (for
example, radio altimeter), and primary flight displays. Electrical and
electronic systems with SAR catastrophic failure conditions (for
example, AFCS) must comply with the Sec. 29.1317(a)(4) High Intensity
Radiated Field (HIRF) requirements.
(c) SAR Mode Performance Requirements.
(1) The SAR modes must be demonstrated in the requested flight
envelope for the following minimum sea-state and wind conditions:
(i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5 meters (8.2 feet), considering
both short and long swells.
(ii) Wind: 25 knots headwind; 17 knots for all other azimuths.
(2) The selected hover height and hover velocity must be captured
(to include the transition from one captured mode to another captured
mode) accurately and smoothly and not exhibit any significant overshoot
or oscillation.
(3) For any single failure or any combination of failures of the
AFCS that is not shown to be extremely improbable, the recovery must
not result in a loss of height greater than half of the minimum use
height (MUH) with a minimum margin of 15 feet above the surface. MUH is
the minimum height at which any SAR AFCS mode can be engaged.
(4) The SAR mode system must be usable up to the maximum certified
gross weight of the aircraft or to the lower of the following weights:
(i) Maximum emergency flotation weight.
(ii) Maximum hover Out-of-Ground Effect (OGE) weight.
(iii) Maximum demonstrated weight.
(d) Flight Characteristics.
(1) The basic aircraft must meet all the part 29 airworthiness
criteria for helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B).
(2) For SAR mode coupled flight below VMINI, at the
maximum demonstrated winds, the helicopter must be able to maintain any
required flight condition and make a smooth transition from any flight
condition to any other flight condition without requiring exceptional
piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without exceeding the limit
load factor. This requirement also includes aircraft control through
the hoist operator's control.
(3) For SAR modes at airspeeds below VMINI the following
requirements of Appendix B to part 29 must be met and will be used as
an extension to the IFR certification envelope of the basic aircraft:
(i) Static Longitudinal Stability: the requirements of paragraph IV
of Appendix B are not applicable.
(ii) Static Lateral-Directional Stability: The requirements of
paragraph V of Appendix B are not applicable.
(iii) Dynamic Stability: The requirements of paragraph VI of
Appendix B are replaced with the following two paragraphs:
(A) Any oscillation must be damped and any aperiodic response must
not double in amplitude in less than 10 seconds. This requirement must
also be met with degraded upper mode(s) of the AFCS. An ``upper mode''
is a mode that utilizes a fully coupled autopilot to provide an
operational SAR profile.
(B) After any upset, the AFCS must return the aircraft to the last
commanded position within 10 seconds or less.
(4) With any of the upper mode(s) of the AFCS engaged the pilot
must be able to manually recover the aircraft and transition to the
normal (Appendix B) IFR flight profile envelope without exceptional
skill, alertness, or strength.
(e) One-Engine Inoperative (OEI) Performance Information.
(1) The following performance information must be provided in the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement (RFMS):
(i) OEI performance information and emergency procedures, providing
the maximum weight that will provide a minimum clearance of 15 feet
above the surface, following failure of the critical engine in a hover.
The maximum weight must be presented as a function of the hover height
for the temperature and pressure altitude range requested for
certification. The effects of wind must be reflected in the hover
performance information.
(ii) Hover OGE performance with the critical engine inoperative for
OEI continuous and time-limited power ratings for those weights,
altitudes, and temperatures for which certification is requested.
Note: These OEI performance requirements do not replace
performance requirements that may be needed to comply with the
airworthiness or operational standards (Sec. 29.865 or 14 CFR part
133) for external loads or human external cargo.
(f) RFMS.
(1) The RFMS must contain, at a minimum:
(i) Limitations necessary for safe operation of the SAR system to
include:
(A) Minimum crew requirements.
(B) Maximum SAR weight.
(C) Engagement criteria for each of the SAR modes to include MUH
(as determined in subparagraph (c)(3)).
(ii) Normal and emergency procedures for operation of the SAR
system (to include operation of the hoist operator control), with AFCS
failure modes, AFCS degraded modes, and engine failures.
(iii) Performance information:
(A) OEI performance and height-loss.
(B) Hover OGE performance information, utilizing OEI continuous and
time-limited power ratings.
(C) The maximum wind envelope demonstrated in flight test.
(g) Flight Demonstration.
(1) Before approval of the SAR system, an acceptable flight
demonstration of all the coupled SAR modes is required.
(2) The AFCS must provide fail-safe operations during coupled
maneuvers. The demonstration of fail-safe operations must include a
pilot workload assessment associated with manually flying the aircraft
to an altitude greater than 200 feet above the surface and an airspeed
of at least the best rate of climb airspeed (Vy).
(3) For any failure condition of the SAR system not shown to be
extremely improbable, the pilot must be able to
[[Page 77528]]
make a smooth transition from one flight mode to another without
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength.
(4) Failure conditions that are not shown to be extremely
improbable must be demonstrated by analysis, ground testing, or flight
testing. For failures demonstrated in flight, the following normal
pilot recovery times are acceptable:
(i) Transition modes (Cruise-to-Hover/Hover-to-Cruise) and Hover
modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 1 second.
(ii) Cruise modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 3 seconds.
(5) All AFCS malfunctions must include evaluation at the low-speed
and high-power flight conditions typical of SAR operations.
Additionally, AFCS hard-over, slow-over, and oscillatory malfunctions,
particularly in yaw, require evaluation. AFCS malfunction testing must
include a single or a combination of failures (for example, erroneous
data from and loss of the radio altimeter, attitude, heading, and
altitude sensors) which are not shown to be extremely improbable.
(6) The flight demonstration must include the following
environmental conditions:
(i) Swell into wind.
(ii) Swell and wind from different directions.
(iii) Cross swell.
(iv) Swell of different lengths (short and long swell).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 3, 2010.
Kimberly K. Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31188 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P