Extension of the Date by Which Youth All-Terrain Vehicles Must Be Tested and Certified, 76708-76710 [2010-30981]
Download as PDF
76708
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
33. If yes, how did the perceived and
actual benefits compare to estimated
and actual costs over the short- and
long-run?
34. What were the main difficulties
that you experienced during a
transition/implementation of new data
standards? What could the organization
developing and maintaining the
standards do (or avoid) to help alleviate
these difficulties?
35. Would it be useful to use a
standardized, computer readable
description for financial derivatives
instruments? How would it be useful?
Would such a standard be useful for
communicating transactions, storing
position information, both, or other
purposes? What would be the costs
involved?
36. How should regulators and
standard setters implement description
standards in the derivatives market?
Making computer descriptions legally
binding:
37. Are there currently aspects of
financial derivatives messaged in a
computer readable format that have a
legally-binding effect?
38. What information, if any, is not
captured that would be required to
make the computer descriptions
themselves, without reference to other
materials, legally binding?
39. What information would need to
be captured for a legally binding
contract that would not need to be
captured for analyzing the contract? Is
there a substantial cost differential
between the processes needed to
capture one set of information versus
another?
40. Would there be a benefit to
making the computer readable
descriptions of financial derivatives
legally binding? Would there be
drawbacks? What are they?
Other:
41. Is there other information not
called for by these questions that we
should consider?
Dated: December 2, 2010.
By the CFTC.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
By the Commission (SEC).
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–30905 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–8011–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2010–0115]
Extension of the Date by Which Youth
All-Terrain Vehicles Must Be Tested
and Certified
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of extension of date of
testing and certification of youth allterrain vehicles.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) is announcing that the
Commission has extended, by 60 days,
the date by which manufacturers
(including importers) of youth allterrain vehicles (ATVs) must submit
sufficient samples of such products to a
third party conformity assessment body
approved by the Commission for testing
and, based on such testing, issue a
certificate that the products
manufactured after the deadline comply
with certain CPSC regulations relating
to ATVs. The extension is granted
because there are an insufficient number
of third party conformity assessment
bodies accredited by the Commission to
permit testing and certification under
the original schedule.1
DATES: The date after which youth ATVs
must be tested by third party conformity
assessment bodies accredited by the
Commission to assess conformity with
the CPSC regulations for all-terrain
vehicles is extended until January 25,
2011.
Comments in response to this notice
should be submitted by December 30,
2010. Comments on this notice should
be captioned ‘‘Third Party Testing and
Certification of Youth All-Terrain
Vehicles: Request for Stay of
Enforcement and Other Relief.’’
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010–
0115, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments in the following
way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
To ensure timely processing of
comments, the Commission is no longer
accepting comments submitted by
electronic mail (e-mail) except through:
https://www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
1 The Commission voted 3–1–1 to approve this
notice. Chairman Inez Tennenbaum, Commissioner
Thomas Moore, and Commissioner Robert Adler
approved the notice. Commissioner Nancy Nord
voted to approve a different version of the notice.
Commissioner Anne Northup abstained.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions in the following way:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions),
preferably in five copies, to: Office of
the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone (301) 504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change to: https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
(such as a Social Security Number)
electronically; if furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard McCallion, Program Area Team
Leader, Office of Hazard Identification
and Reduction, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission,10901 Darnestown
Road, Gaithersburg, MD 20878; e-mail:
rmccallion@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the CPSA, as
added by section 102(a)(2) of the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement
Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’), Public Law 110–
314, directs the CPSC to establish and
publish a notice of requirements for
accreditation of third party conformity
assessment bodies to assess children’s
products for conformity with ‘‘other
children’s product safety rules.’’ Section
14(f)(1) of the CPSA defines ‘‘children’s
product safety rule’’ as ‘‘a consumer
product safety rule under [the CPSA] or
similar rule, regulation, standard, or ban
under any other Act enforced by the
Commission, including a rule declaring
a consumer product to be a banned
hazardous product or substance.’’ Under
section 14(a)(3)(A) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2063(a)(3)(A), each manufacturer
(including an importer) or private
labeler of products subject to those
regulations must have products that are
manufactured more than 90 days after
the establishment and Federal Register
publication of a notice of the
requirements for accreditation tested by
a third party conformity assessment
body accredited to do so, and must issue
a certificate of compliance with the
applicable regulations based on that
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
testing. Pursuant to section 14(a)(3)(F) of
the CPSA, the Commission may extend
the 90-day period by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that
an insufficient number of third party
conformity assessment bodies have been
accredited to permit certification for a
children’s product safety rule.
Irrespective of certification, the product
in question must comply with
applicable CPSC requirements (see, e.g.,
section 14(h) of the CPSA, as added by
section 102(b) of the CPSIA).
In the Federal Register of August 27,
2010 (75 FR 52616) (accessible at
https://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/frnotices/
fr10/atv.pdf), the Commission published
a notice of requirements that provided
the criteria and process for Commission
acceptance of accreditation of third
party conformity assessment bodies for
testing of ATVs designed or intended
primarily for children 12 years of age or
younger pursuant to 16 CFR part 1420,
the CPSC regulations under the CPSA
relating to ATVs. The notice of
requirements stated that, for youth
ATVs manufactured after November 26,
2010, the manufacturer ‘‘must issue a
certificate of compliance with 16 CFR
part 1420 based on’’ testing performed
by a third party conformity assessment
body (75 FR at 52618). The notice also
asked for comments on the notice to be
received by September 27, 2010.
The notice of requirements also stated
that the Commission will accept a
certificate of compliance with 16 CFR
part 1420, Requirements for All Terrain
Vehicles, based on testing performed by
an accredited third party conformity
assessment body (including a
government-owned or governmentcontrolled conformity assessment body,
or a firewalled conformity assessment
body) prior to the Commission’s
acceptance of its accreditation, if all the
following conditions are met:
• When the product was tested, the
testing was done by a third party
conformity assessment body, which at
that time, was ISO/IEC 17025 accredited
by an International Laboratory
Accreditation Cooperation-Mutual
Recognition Arrangement (‘‘ILAC/
MRA’’) signatory. For firewalled
conformity assessment bodies, the
Commission will not accept a certificate
of compliance based upon testing
performed by the third party conformity
assessment body, unless the firewalled
conformity assessment body was
accredited, by order, as a firewalled
conformity assessment body before the
product was tested, even though the
order would not have included the test
methods in 16 CFR part 1420.
• The third party conformity
assessment body’s application for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
testing using the test methods in 16 CFR
part 1420 is accepted by the CPSC on or
before October 26, 2010.
• The product was tested on or after
November 4, 2008 (the date that 16 CFR
part 1420 was published).
• The accreditation scope in effect for
the third party conformity assessment
body at the time of testing expressly
included testing to 16 CFR part 1420.
• The test results show compliance
with the applicable current standards
and/or regulations.
• The third party conformity
assessment body’s accreditation,
including 16 CFR part 1420 in its scope,
remains in effect through the effective
date for mandatory third party testing
and manufacturer certification for
conformity with 16 CFR part 1420.
75 FR at 52619. Obviously, the date
specified in that notice for acceptance of
such ‘‘retrospective’’ testing, October 26,
2010, has passed.
II. Requests for Extension
In response to the notice of
requirements, the Specialty Vehicle
Institute of America (‘‘SVIA’’) filed a
comment that included a request that
the Commission extend by 60 days the
date by which manufacturers must
begin testing and certification of youth
ATVs. Among the reasons given for the
extension were the complexity of 16
CFR part 1420 and that no third party
conformity assessment bodies have been
accredited by an accrediting body that is
a signatory to the ILAC/MRA, a
prerequisite for such conformity
assessment bodies to be accepted by the
CPSC.
On November 17, 2010, the SVIA filed
a ‘‘Petition for Extension and Stay of
Enforcement for Third Party Testing for
Certain All-Terrain Vehicles.’’ The
petition requested a 60-day extension of
the date by which manufacturers must
begin testing and certification of youth
ATVs, stating that no third party
conformity assessment bodies have been
accredited by the CPSC to test for
conformity with 16 CFR part 1420. The
SVIA concluded that it is unlikely that
a sufficient number of accredited third
party conformity assessment bodies will
exist by the end of the requested 60-day
extension. As a result, the SVIA also
requested that the Commission consider
additional forms of relief, such as a
further stay of enforcement of these
requirements for one year (to November
27, 2011). Hereafter, the comment and
the petition will be referred to
collectively as ‘‘the petition.’’
III. Commission Action on the Petition
As to the request for a 60-day
extension of the date by which
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76709
manufacturers must begin testing and
certification of youth ATVs, the
Commission is not aware of any third
party conformity assessment bodies that
have the requisite accreditation by an
ILAC–MRA signatory to test for
conformity to 16 CFR part 1420. Given
this situation, the Commission is
granting the request for a 60-day
extension.
The Commission is not granting or
denying the request for a one-year stay
of enforcement, or other relief, at this
time. The Commission invites comment
on this request. Comments should be
filed by December 30, 2010. The
Commission particularly is interested in
comments on:
1. What efforts have been made by
ATV manufacturers or others to obtain
tests of youth ATVs by third party
conformity assessment bodies and to
encourage third party conformity
assessment bodies to become accredited
to do so?
2. What is the status of the efforts of
third party conformity assessment
bodies to become accredited to test
youth ATVs, and how long will it take
to obtain such accreditation?
3. What barriers currently exist to
gaining accreditation that are
specifically related to youth ATVs?
4. How are ATV manufacturers
currently demonstrating compliance
with the ANSI/SVIA–2007–1 standard?
What ATV manufacturers are currently
doing in-house testing of their ATVs for
conformance to the standard? What
steps, if any, have these manufacturers
taken to have their existing in-house
testing facilities become accredited third
party conformity assessment bodies?
5. What third party testing facilities
are capable of testing youth ATVs to the
ANSI/SVIA–2007–1 standard?
IV. Dates Affected by This Extension
This extension is effective beginning
on November 27, 2010. Accordingly,
each manufacturer of a youth ATV
subject to 16 CFR part 1420 must have
samples of any such product, or samples
that are identical in all material respects
to such product, that is manufactured
after January 25, 2011, tested by a third
party conformity assessment body
accredited to do so by the Commission.
Further, for youth ATVs manufactured
after January 25, 2011, the manufacturer
must issue a certificate of compliance
with 16 CFR part 1420 based on that
testing. (Under the CPSA, the term
‘‘manufacturer’’ includes anyone who
manufactures or imports a product. See
16 CFR part 1110.)
Furthermore, the Commission is
changing the dates it had established for
when it would accept the results of tests
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
76710
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
of youth ATVs conducted by a third
party conformity assessment body
before that body became accredited by
the CPSC. Accordingly, the Commission
will accept a certificate of compliance
with 16 CFR part 1420, Requirements
for All Terrain Vehicles, based on
testing performed by an accredited third
party conformity assessment body
(including a government-owned or
government-controlled conformity
assessment body, or a firewalled
conformity assessment body) prior to
the Commission’s acceptance of its
accreditation, if all the following
conditions are met:
• When the product was tested, the
testing was done by a third party
conformity assessment body that at that
time was ISO/IEC 17025 accredited by
an ILAC–MRA signatory. For firewalled
conformity assessment bodies, the
Commission will not accept a certificate
of compliance based on testing
performed by the third party conformity
assessment body unless the firewalled
conformity assessment body was
accredited by a Commission order as a
firewalled conformity assessment body
before the product was tested, even
though the order will not have included
the test methods in 16 CFR part 1420.
• The third party conformity
assessment body’s application for
testing using the test methods in the
regulations identified in this notice is
accepted by the CPSC on or before
December 27, 2010.
• The product was tested on or after
November 4, 2008 (the date that 16 CFR
part 1420 was published).
• The accreditation scope in effect for
the third party conformity assessment
body at the time of testing expressly
included testing to 16 CFR part 1420.
• The test results show compliance
with the applicable current standards
and/or regulations.
• The third party conformity
assessment body’s accreditation,
including 16 CFR part 1420 in its scope,
remains in effect through February 7,
2011.
Except for the dates that are adjusted
by 60 days in this notice, all provisions
of the notice of requirements published
on August 27, 2010, 75 FR 52616,
remain in effect.
Dated: December 3, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–30981 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings No. 1
November 24, 2010.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC11–23–000.
Applicants: Flat Water Wind Farm,
LLC., Flat Water Holdings, LLC.
Description: Application for
Authorization of Transaction Pursuant
to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act
of Flat Water Wind Farm, LLC.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5111.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Docket Numbers: EC11–24–000.
Applicants: Elk Hills Power, LLC.
Description: Application of Elk Hills
Power, LLC.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5173.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG11–29–000.
Applicants: Snowflake Power, LLC.
Description: Self-Certification of EWG
of Snowflake Power, LLC.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5134.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Docket Numbers: EG11–30–000.
Applicants: Evergreen Wind Power
III, LLC.
Description: Notice of EWG SelfCertification of Evergreen Wind Power
III, LLC.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5135.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Docket Numbers: EG11–31–000.
Applicants: Paradise Solar Urban
Renewal, L.L.C.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Paradise Solar
Urban Renewal, L.L.C.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5160.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER06–1399–009.
Applicants: Sunbury Generation LP.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description: Sunbury Generation LP
submits supplement to its notice of nonmaterial change in status pursuant to
the Commission’s regulation at 18 CFR,
Section 35.42.
Filed Date: 11/18/2010.
Accession Number: 20101118–5136.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Thursday, December 09, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1599–002.
Applicants: Invenergy Cannon Falls
LLC.
Description: Invenergy Cannon Falls
LLC. submits Supplemental Category 1
Exemption Filing, to be effective 11/3/
2010.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5068.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1600–002.
Applicants: Forward Energy LLC.
Description: Forward Energy LLC.
submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplemental Category 1 Exemption
Filing to be effective 10/30/2010.
Filed Date: 11/24/2010.
Accession Number: 20101124–5034.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Wednesday, December 15, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1601–002.
Applicants: Hardee Power Partners
Limited.
Description: Hardee Power Partners
Limited submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplemental Category 1 Exemption
Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
Filed Date: 11/23/2010.
Accession Number: 20101123–5087.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1603–002.
Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy LLC.
Description: Grand Ridge Energy LLC.
submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplemental Category 1 Exemption
Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
Filed Date: 11/24/2010.
Accession Number: 20101124–5035.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Wednesday, December 15, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1604–002.
Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy II
LLC.
Description: Grand Ridge Energy II
LLC. submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplemental Category 1 Exemption
Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
Filed Date: 11/24/2010.
Accession Number: 20101124–5036.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Wednesday, December 15, 2010.
Docket Numbers: ER10–1605–002.
Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy III
LLC.
Description: Grand Ridge Energy III
LLC. submits tariff filing per 35:
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76708-76710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30981]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC-2010-0115]
Extension of the Date by Which Youth All-Terrain Vehicles Must Be
Tested and Certified
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice of extension of date of testing and certification of
youth all-terrain vehicles.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (``CPSC'' or
``Commission'') is announcing that the Commission has extended, by 60
days, the date by which manufacturers (including importers) of youth
all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) must submit sufficient samples of such
products to a third party conformity assessment body approved by the
Commission for testing and, based on such testing, issue a certificate
that the products manufactured after the deadline comply with certain
CPSC regulations relating to ATVs. The extension is granted because
there are an insufficient number of third party conformity assessment
bodies accredited by the Commission to permit testing and certification
under the original schedule.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission voted 3-1-1 to approve this notice. Chairman
Inez Tennenbaum, Commissioner Thomas Moore, and Commissioner Robert
Adler approved the notice. Commissioner Nancy Nord voted to approve
a different version of the notice. Commissioner Anne Northup
abstained.
DATES: The date after which youth ATVs must be tested by third party
conformity assessment bodies accredited by the Commission to assess
conformity with the CPSC regulations for all-terrain vehicles is
extended until January 25, 2011.
Comments in response to this notice should be submitted by December
30, 2010. Comments on this notice should be captioned ``Third Party
Testing and Certification of Youth All-Terrain Vehicles: Request for
Stay of Enforcement and Other Relief.''
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2010-
0115, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments in the following
way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. To ensure timely processing of
comments, the Commission is no longer accepting comments submitted by
electronic mail (e-mail) except through: https://www.regulations.gov.
Written Submissions: Submit written submissions in the following
way:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions), preferably in five copies, to: Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7923.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted
without change to: https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Do not submit confidential business information,
trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information
(such as a Social Security Number) electronically; if furnished at all,
such information should be submitted in writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard McCallion, Program Area Team
Leader, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission,10901 Darnestown Road, Gaithersburg, MD
20878; e-mail: rmccallion@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(a)(2)
of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (``CPSIA''),
Public Law 110-314, directs the CPSC to establish and publish a notice
of requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment
bodies to assess children's products for conformity with ``other
children's product safety rules.'' Section 14(f)(1) of the CPSA defines
``children's product safety rule'' as ``a consumer product safety rule
under [the CPSA] or similar rule, regulation, standard, or ban under
any other Act enforced by the Commission, including a rule declaring a
consumer product to be a banned hazardous product or substance.'' Under
section 14(a)(3)(A) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(3)(A), each
manufacturer (including an importer) or private labeler of products
subject to those regulations must have products that are manufactured
more than 90 days after the establishment and Federal Register
publication of a notice of the requirements for accreditation tested by
a third party conformity assessment body accredited to do so, and must
issue a certificate of compliance with the applicable regulations based
on that
[[Page 76709]]
testing. Pursuant to section 14(a)(3)(F) of the CPSA, the Commission
may extend the 90-day period by not more than 60 days if the Commission
determines that an insufficient number of third party conformity
assessment bodies have been accredited to permit certification for a
children's product safety rule. Irrespective of certification, the
product in question must comply with applicable CPSC requirements (see,
e.g., section 14(h) of the CPSA, as added by section 102(b) of the
CPSIA).
In the Federal Register of August 27, 2010 (75 FR 52616)
(accessible at https://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/frnotices/fr10/atv.pdf), the
Commission published a notice of requirements that provided the
criteria and process for Commission acceptance of accreditation of
third party conformity assessment bodies for testing of ATVs designed
or intended primarily for children 12 years of age or younger pursuant
to 16 CFR part 1420, the CPSC regulations under the CPSA relating to
ATVs. The notice of requirements stated that, for youth ATVs
manufactured after November 26, 2010, the manufacturer ``must issue a
certificate of compliance with 16 CFR part 1420 based on'' testing
performed by a third party conformity assessment body (75 FR at 52618).
The notice also asked for comments on the notice to be received by
September 27, 2010.
The notice of requirements also stated that the Commission will
accept a certificate of compliance with 16 CFR part 1420, Requirements
for All Terrain Vehicles, based on testing performed by an accredited
third party conformity assessment body (including a government-owned or
government-controlled conformity assessment body, or a firewalled
conformity assessment body) prior to the Commission's acceptance of its
accreditation, if all the following conditions are met:
When the product was tested, the testing was done by a
third party conformity assessment body, which at that time, was ISO/IEC
17025 accredited by an International Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation-Mutual Recognition Arrangement (``ILAC/MRA'') signatory.
For firewalled conformity assessment bodies, the Commission will not
accept a certificate of compliance based upon testing performed by the
third party conformity assessment body, unless the firewalled
conformity assessment body was accredited, by order, as a firewalled
conformity assessment body before the product was tested, even though
the order would not have included the test methods in 16 CFR part 1420.
The third party conformity assessment body's application
for testing using the test methods in 16 CFR part 1420 is accepted by
the CPSC on or before October 26, 2010.
The product was tested on or after November 4, 2008 (the
date that 16 CFR part 1420 was published).
The accreditation scope in effect for the third party
conformity assessment body at the time of testing expressly included
testing to 16 CFR part 1420.
The test results show compliance with the applicable
current standards and/or regulations.
The third party conformity assessment body's
accreditation, including 16 CFR part 1420 in its scope, remains in
effect through the effective date for mandatory third party testing and
manufacturer certification for conformity with 16 CFR part 1420.
75 FR at 52619. Obviously, the date specified in that notice for
acceptance of such ``retrospective'' testing, October 26, 2010, has
passed.
II. Requests for Extension
In response to the notice of requirements, the Specialty Vehicle
Institute of America (``SVIA'') filed a comment that included a request
that the Commission extend by 60 days the date by which manufacturers
must begin testing and certification of youth ATVs. Among the reasons
given for the extension were the complexity of 16 CFR part 1420 and
that no third party conformity assessment bodies have been accredited
by an accrediting body that is a signatory to the ILAC/MRA, a
prerequisite for such conformity assessment bodies to be accepted by
the CPSC.
On November 17, 2010, the SVIA filed a ``Petition for Extension and
Stay of Enforcement for Third Party Testing for Certain All-Terrain
Vehicles.'' The petition requested a 60-day extension of the date by
which manufacturers must begin testing and certification of youth ATVs,
stating that no third party conformity assessment bodies have been
accredited by the CPSC to test for conformity with 16 CFR part 1420.
The SVIA concluded that it is unlikely that a sufficient number of
accredited third party conformity assessment bodies will exist by the
end of the requested 60-day extension. As a result, the SVIA also
requested that the Commission consider additional forms of relief, such
as a further stay of enforcement of these requirements for one year (to
November 27, 2011). Hereafter, the comment and the petition will be
referred to collectively as ``the petition.''
III. Commission Action on the Petition
As to the request for a 60-day extension of the date by which
manufacturers must begin testing and certification of youth ATVs, the
Commission is not aware of any third party conformity assessment bodies
that have the requisite accreditation by an ILAC-MRA signatory to test
for conformity to 16 CFR part 1420. Given this situation, the
Commission is granting the request for a 60-day extension.
The Commission is not granting or denying the request for a one-
year stay of enforcement, or other relief, at this time. The Commission
invites comment on this request. Comments should be filed by December
30, 2010. The Commission particularly is interested in comments on:
1. What efforts have been made by ATV manufacturers or others to
obtain tests of youth ATVs by third party conformity assessment bodies
and to encourage third party conformity assessment bodies to become
accredited to do so?
2. What is the status of the efforts of third party conformity
assessment bodies to become accredited to test youth ATVs, and how long
will it take to obtain such accreditation?
3. What barriers currently exist to gaining accreditation that are
specifically related to youth ATVs?
4. How are ATV manufacturers currently demonstrating compliance
with the ANSI/SVIA-2007-1 standard? What ATV manufacturers are
currently doing in-house testing of their ATVs for conformance to the
standard? What steps, if any, have these manufacturers taken to have
their existing in-house testing facilities become accredited third
party conformity assessment bodies?
5. What third party testing facilities are capable of testing youth
ATVs to the ANSI/SVIA-2007-1 standard?
IV. Dates Affected by This Extension
This extension is effective beginning on November 27, 2010.
Accordingly, each manufacturer of a youth ATV subject to 16 CFR part
1420 must have samples of any such product, or samples that are
identical in all material respects to such product, that is
manufactured after January 25, 2011, tested by a third party conformity
assessment body accredited to do so by the Commission. Further, for
youth ATVs manufactured after January 25, 2011, the manufacturer must
issue a certificate of compliance with 16 CFR part 1420 based on that
testing. (Under the CPSA, the term ``manufacturer'' includes anyone who
manufactures or imports a product. See 16 CFR part 1110.)
Furthermore, the Commission is changing the dates it had
established for when it would accept the results of tests
[[Page 76710]]
of youth ATVs conducted by a third party conformity assessment body
before that body became accredited by the CPSC. Accordingly, the
Commission will accept a certificate of compliance with 16 CFR part
1420, Requirements for All Terrain Vehicles, based on testing performed
by an accredited third party conformity assessment body (including a
government-owned or government-controlled conformity assessment body,
or a firewalled conformity assessment body) prior to the Commission's
acceptance of its accreditation, if all the following conditions are
met:
When the product was tested, the testing was done by a
third party conformity assessment body that at that time was ISO/IEC
17025 accredited by an ILAC-MRA signatory. For firewalled conformity
assessment bodies, the Commission will not accept a certificate of
compliance based on testing performed by the third party conformity
assessment body unless the firewalled conformity assessment body was
accredited by a Commission order as a firewalled conformity assessment
body before the product was tested, even though the order will not have
included the test methods in 16 CFR part 1420.
The third party conformity assessment body's application
for testing using the test methods in the regulations identified in
this notice is accepted by the CPSC on or before December 27, 2010.
The product was tested on or after November 4, 2008 (the
date that 16 CFR part 1420 was published).
The accreditation scope in effect for the third party
conformity assessment body at the time of testing expressly included
testing to 16 CFR part 1420.
The test results show compliance with the applicable
current standards and/or regulations.
The third party conformity assessment body's
accreditation, including 16 CFR part 1420 in its scope, remains in
effect through February 7, 2011.
Except for the dates that are adjusted by 60 days in this notice,
all provisions of the notice of requirements published on August 27,
2010, 75 FR 52616, remain in effect.
Dated: December 3, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-30981 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P