Market Access Agreement, 76729-76731 [2010-30930]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
indication that CIWA failed to request a
waiver in order to avoid the
requirements of the ARRA, particularly
since there are no domestically
manufactured products available that
meet the project specifications.
Therefore, EPA will consider CIWA’s
waiver request, a foreseeable late
request, as though it had been timely
made since there is no gain by CIWA
and no loss by the government due to
the late request.
Furthermore, the purpose of the
ARRA is to stimulate economic recovery
by funding current infrastructure
construction, not to delay projects that
are ‘‘shovel ready’’ by requiring potential
SRF eligible recipients, such as the
Central Iowa Water Association to revise
their design standards and
specifications as well as their
construction schedule. There are no
domestic manufacturers that can
provide a compatible water meter
monitor that meets the specifications of
this drinking water improvement
project. To delay this construction
would directly conflict with a
fundamental economic purpose of
ARRA, which is to create or retain jobs.
The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ
Memorandum, ‘‘Implementation of Buy
American provisions of Public Law
111–5, the ‘American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009’ ’’
(‘‘Memorandum’’), defines reasonably
available quantity as ‘‘the quantity of
iron, steel, or relevant manufactured
good is available or will be available at
the time needed and place needed, and
in the proper form or specification as
specified in the project plans and
design.’’ The same Memorandum
defines ‘‘satisfactory quality’’ as ‘‘the
quality of steel, iron or manufactured
good specified in the project plans and
designs.’’
The March 31, 2009 Delegation of
Authority Memorandum provided
Regional Administrators with the
temporary authority to issue exceptions
to Section 1605 of the ARRA within the
geographic boundaries of their
respective regions and with respect to
requests by individual grant recipients.
Having established both a proper
basis to specify the particular good
required for this project and that this
manufactured good was not available
from a producer in the United States,
the CIWA is hereby granted a waiver
from the Buy American requirements of
Section 1605(a) of Public Law 111–5.
This waiver permits use of ARRA funds
for the purchase of a non-domestic
manufactured ORION Water Meter
Monitors with Leak Detection Indicator
documented in the CIWA’s waiver
request submittal dated June 24, 2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
This supplementary information
constitutes the detailed written
justification required by Section 1605(c)
for waivers based on a finding under
subsection (b).
Authority: Public Law 111–5, section
1605.
Dated: November 30, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2010–30971 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Market Access Agreement
Farm Credit Administration.
Notice of approval of the draft
amendment to the amended and
restated market access agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Farm Credit
Administration (FCA or we) announces
its approval of the draft amendment to
the Amended and Restated Market
Access Agreement (MAA) proposed to
be entered into by all of the banks of the
Farm Credit System (System) and the
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding
Corporation (Funding Corporation). The
MAA sets forth the rights and
responsibilities of each of the parties
when the condition of a bank falls
below pre-established financial
performance thresholds. The draft
amendment (MAA Amendment) is
intended to conform the MAA to the
Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement (Reallocation Agreement).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Wilson, Financial Analyst, Office
of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit
Administration, McLean, VA 22102–
5090, (703) 883–4204, TTY (703) 883–
4434, or Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior
Counsel, Office of General Counsel,
Farm Credit Administration, McLean,
VA 22102–5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY
(703) 883–4020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
18, 2010, the FCA published for
comment a proposed Reallocation
Agreement to be entered into by all of
the banks of the System and the
Funding Corporation (75 FR 51061). The
Reallocation Agreement is designed to
establish a procedure for non-defaulting
banks to pay maturing System-wide
debt on behalf of defaulting banks prior
to a statutory joint and several call by
the FCA. We received no comments on
the proposal and approved it without
modifications. The FCA’s approval was
published in the Federal Register on
October 20, 2010 (75 FR 64727).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76729
In the supplementary information we
provided when we published the
proposal for public comment, the FCA
stated that the System banks and the
Funding Corporation intended also to
make conforming changes to the MAA
to ensure that the MAA provisions did
not impede operation of the
Reallocation Agreement. The FCA stated
further that, should the Agency approve
the Reallocation Agreement, it expected
also to approve the conforming MAA
Amendment and would publish it in the
Federal Register.
The FCA published the current MAA
in its entirety in the Federal Register on
January 15, 2003 (68 FR 2037). The
current MAA establishes certain
financial thresholds at which conditions
are placed on the activities of a bank or
a bank’s access to participation in
System-wide and consolidated
obligations is restricted. The MAA
establishes three categories, which are
based on each bank’s net collateral ratio,
permanent capital ratio, and scores
under the Contractual Inter-bank
Performance Agreement, which is an
agreement among the System banks and
the Funding Corporation that
establishes certain financial
performance criteria.
Under the MAA, as a bank’s financial
condition declines, the bank moves into
Category I, then Category II, and finally
Category III. When a bank reaches
Category I, it is required to provide
certain additional information,
including information as to how it will
improve its financial condition, to the
Monitoring and Advisory Committee, a
committee of bank and Funding
Corporation representatives established
under the MAA. When a bank reaches
Category II, in addition to being
required to provide additional
information, the bank is limited to
joining in the issuance of System-wide
and consolidated obligations only in
those amounts necessary for the bank to
be able to roll over its maturing debt.
When the bank reaches Category III, the
bank is precluded from joining in the
issuance of System-wide and
consolidated obligations.
The MAA includes provisions that
enable a bank in Category II or III to
request the opportunity to continue its
access to the market. The MAA also
provides that the FCA may override a
decision to impose Category III
prohibitions on access to the market for
a period of 60 days, which may be
renewed for an additional 60-day
period.
The MAA Amendment adds new
sections 4.05, 5.05, and 7.23 to the
MAA. The MAA Amendment provides
that, in a circumstance where the joint
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
76730
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
and several payment provisions of the
Reallocation Agreement have been
triggered, all non-defaulting System
banks will be able to issue System-wide
obligations to fund payments under the
Reallocation Agreement. This means
that even banks in Category II and III
could participate in such issuances. The
MAA Amendment also provides that the
MAA and the Reallocation Agreement
are separate agreements, and
invalidation of one does not affect the
other.
The FCA now approves the MAA
Amendment as set forth below. The
FCA’s approval is conditioned on the
board of directors of each bank and the
Funding Corporation approving the
MAA Amendment. Neither the MAA
Amendment, when it becomes effective,
nor FCA approval of it shall in any way
restrict or qualify the authority of the
FCA or the Farm Credit System
Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) to
exercise any of the powers, rights, or
duties granted by law to the FCA or the
FCSIC. Finally, the FCA retains the right
to modify or revoke its approval of the
MAA, including the MAA Amendment,
at any time.
The MAA Amendment, together with
the recitals to the amendment, is as
follows:
Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Market Access Agreement
This amendment to the amended and
restated market access agreement (the
‘‘Amendment’’) is made as of the [__] day
of [_______] (the ‘‘Effective Date’’), by
and among AgFirst Farm Credit Bank;
AgriBank, FCB; CoBank, ACB; the Farm
Credit Bank of Texas; and the U.S.
AgBank, FCB (as successor to the Farm
Credit Bank of Wichita and the Western
Farm Credit Bank under Section 7.12 of
the Market Access Agreement) (each, a
‘‘Bank,’’ and collectively, the ‘‘Banks’’),
and the Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation (the ‘‘Funding
Corporation’’).
Whereas, the Banks and the Funding
Corporation desire to adopt a
contractual reallocation of each Bank’s
joint and several liability obligations as
an alternative to Section 4.4(a)(2) of the
Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended
(the ‘‘Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement’’);
Whereas, the Banks and the Funding
Corporation desire to amend the
Amended and Restated Market Access
Agreement dated July 1, 2003 (the
‘‘Market Access Agreement’’) in order to
effectuate the intended purpose of the
Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement;
Whereas, the boards of directors of the
Banks and the Funding Corporation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
gave approval to the Amendment
subject to certain conditions;
Whereas, the Amendment was
submitted to the Farm Credit
Administration (the ‘‘FCA’’) for approval
and to the Farm Credit System
Insurance Corporation (the ‘‘Insurance
Corporation’’) for an expression of no
objection;
Whereas, the FCA published a
description of this Amendment in
connection with the publication of the
Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement in the Federal Register on
August 18, 2010 and sought comments
thereon;
Whereas, after receiving comments on
the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement,[1] the FCA,
pursuant to the letter dated ll,
approved this Amendment subject to
modifications, if any, that are acceptable
to the Banks and the Funding
Corporation and a notice of such
approval was published in the Federal
Register on [llllllll];
Whereas, the Insurance Corporation,
pursuant to the letter dated [lll],
from the Insurance Corporation to the
Banks and the Funding Corporation,
expressed no objection to this
Amendment;
Now therefore, in consideration of the
foregoing, the Banks and the Funding
Corporation, intending to be legally
bound hereby, agree to further amend
the Market Access Agreement as
follows:
Section 1.01 After current Section
4.04 of the Market Access Agreement,
add new Section 4.05, which reads as
follows:
‘‘Section 4.05. Relationship to the Joint
and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement. A Category II Bank shall not be
subject to the Final Restrictions and Category
II Interim Restrictions, to the extent that the
Final Restrictions and Category II Interim
Restrictions would prohibit such Category II
Bank from issuing debt required to fund such
Category II Bank’s liabilities and obligations
under the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement.’’
Section 1.02 After current Section
5.04 of the Market Access Agreement,
add new Section 5.05, which reads as
follows:
‘‘Section 5.05. Relationship to the Joint
and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement. A Category III Bank shall not be
subject to the Final Prohibition or Category
III Interim Restrictions, to the extent that the
Final Prohibition or Category III Interim
Restrictions would prohibit such Category III
Bank from issuing debt required to fund such
Category III Bank’s liabilities and obligations
1 We note that, although this paragraph states that
the FCA received comments on the Reallocation
Agreement, we did not receive comments on it.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement.’’
Section 1.03 After current Section
7.22 of the Market Access Agreement,
add new Section 7.23, which reads as
follows:
‘‘Section 7.23. Relationship to the Joint
and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement. This Restated MAA and the Joint
and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement
are separate agreements, and invalidation of
one does not affect the other.’’
Section 1.04 Continuation of Market
Access Agreement. Except as expressly
provided in this Amendment, the
Market Access Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect in accordance
with its terms.
Section 1.05 Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in two or
more counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original, but all of
which together shall constitute a single
document.
In witness whereof, each party hereto
has caused this Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officers
or representatives, all as of the date
written below.
AGFIRST FARM CREDIT BANK
By:
llllllllllllllllll
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
AGRIBANK, FCB
By:
llllllllllllllllll
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
COBANK, ACB
By:
llllllllllllllllll
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
Farm Credit Bank of Texas
By:
llllllllllllllllll
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
U.S. AGBANK, FCB
By:
llllllllllllllllll
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding
Corporation
By:
llllllllllllllllll
Name:
llllllllllllllllll
Title:
llllllllllllllllll
Date:
llllllllllllllllll
Dated: December 3, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–30930 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[MB Docket No. 10–238; DA 10–2227]
Request for Comment for Report on InState Broadcast Programming
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of
comments.
AGENCY:
This document solicits public
comments and data for use in
preparation of a report on in-state
broadcasting required by Section 304 of
the Satellite Television Extension and
Localism Act of 2010 (STELA). The
Commission is required by legislative
mandate to submit this report no later
than August 27, 2011.
DATES: Comments may be filed on or
before January 24, 2011, and reply
comments may be filed on or before
February 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Bring, Media Bureau (202) 418–2164,
TTY (202) 418–7172, or e-mail at
Danny.Bring@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s document
in MB Docket No. 10–238, DA–10–2227,
released November 23, 2010. The
complete text of the document is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554, and may
also be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, BCPI,
Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:35 Dec 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
Washington, DC 20054. Customers may
contact BCPI, Inc. at their Web site
https://www.bcpi.com or call 1–800–
378–3160.
Synopsis
1. Section 304 of the Satellite
Television Extension and Localism Act
of 2010 (STELA) requires the
Commission to submit a report on instate broadcast programming to the
appropriate Congressional committees
no later than 18 months after its
enactment (i.e., August 27, 2011).
Satellite Television Extension and
Localism Act of 2010, Title V of the
‘‘American Workers, State, and Business
Relief Act of 2010,’’ Public Law 111–
175, 124 Stat. 1218 (2010). By this
Public Notice, the Media Bureau
(Bureau) seeks comment for use in
preparation of the required report.
2. Specifically, Section 304 of STELA
states:
SEC. 304. REPORT ON IN-STATE
BROADCAST PROGRAMMING. Not later
than 18 months after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Federal
Communications Commission shall submit to
the appropriate Congressional committees a
report containing an analysis of—
(1) The number of households in a State
that receive the signals of local broadcast
stations assigned to a community of license
that is located in a different State;
(2) the extent to which consumers in each
local market have access to in-state broadcast
programming over the air or from a
multichannel video programming distributor;
and
(3) whether there are alternatives to the use
of designated market areas, as defined in
section 122 of title 17, United States Code,
to define local markets that would provide
more consumers with in-state broadcast
programming.
3. To analyze the issues relating to the
availability of in-state broadcast stations
for consumers, the Bureau seeks
comment generally regarding the
appropriate methodologies, metrics,
data sources, and level of granularity we
should use for our report to Congress
required under Section 304. We also
seek comment regarding our
interpretation of and metrics
appropriate for each of the specific
subsections of Section 304. In addition,
the Bureau requests data for use in
preparation of the report.
4. Section 304(1): Section 304(1)
requires the Commission to estimate the
number of households in a state that
receive the signals of local broadcast
stations assigned to a community of
license that is located in a different
state. The Bureau proposes to use OET
Bulletin No. 69 (OET 69) methodology
to estimate the number of households in
each broadcast television station’s
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76731
service area. OET Bulletin 69, available
at https://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/
documents/bulletins/#69, provides
guidance on the use of the Longley-Rice
propagation model and U.S. Census
blocks to evaluate TV service coverage
and interference. The Bureau seeks
comment on the use of OET 69 and
which stations to include in the analysis
(i.e., commercial, noncommercial
educational, Class A, translators,
satellite, and/or low-power).
5. Section 304(2): Section 304(2)
requires the Commission to estimate the
extent to which consumers in each local
market have access to in-state broadcast
programming over-the-air or from a
multichannel video programming
distributor (MVPD). The Bureau
proposes that the term ‘‘consumers’’
should be interpreted as households, the
term ‘‘local market’’ should be
interpreted as the designated market
area (DMA), and the term ‘‘access’’
should refer to the ability to obtain a
television station’s broadcast
programming. The Bureau seeks
comment on the interpretation of these
terms.
6. The Bureau seeks comment on
whether the intent of the Section 304(2)
analysis is to identify geographic areas
(e.g., counties) and associated
populations within specific states that
have limited access to in-state broadcast
programming and whether analysis
based on DMAs will identify these
geographic areas and populations. The
Bureau also seeks comment on whether
other criteria should be considered,
such as network affiliation or whether
the stations offer local news. To
measure the ‘‘extent’’ to which
consumers in each local market have
access to in-state broadcast
programming, the Bureau intends to
collect, aggregate, and compare data
based on DMAs and counties and
requests data on a DMA and county
basis. Commenters also are invited to
suggest and provide data for other
geographic areas that would be
responsive to the directive of Section
304(2). Commenters are asked to submit
any other data that they believe will
assist the Commission in preparing the
report.
7. In addition, the Bureau seeks
comment on three possible approaches
for measuring the extent of access to instate broadcast programming, whereby
we would estimate the number of
households that have access to (1) a
specific number of in-state stations, (2)
some percentage of their broadcast
programming from in-state stations, or
(3) some percentage of the stations
licensed to communities in their state.
The Bureau asks commenting parties to
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76729-76731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30930]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Market Access Agreement
AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
ACTION: Notice of approval of the draft amendment to the amended and
restated market access agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or we) announces its
approval of the draft amendment to the Amended and Restated Market
Access Agreement (MAA) proposed to be entered into by all of the banks
of the Farm Credit System (System) and the Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation). The MAA sets forth the
rights and responsibilities of each of the parties when the condition
of a bank falls below pre-established financial performance thresholds.
The draft amendment (MAA Amendment) is intended to conform the MAA to
the Joint and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement (Reallocation
Agreement).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Wilson, Financial Analyst,
Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA
22102-5090, (703) 883-4204, TTY (703) 883-4434, or Rebecca S. Orlich,
Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration,
McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 18, 2010, the FCA published for
comment a proposed Reallocation Agreement to be entered into by all of
the banks of the System and the Funding Corporation (75 FR 51061). The
Reallocation Agreement is designed to establish a procedure for non-
defaulting banks to pay maturing System-wide debt on behalf of
defaulting banks prior to a statutory joint and several call by the
FCA. We received no comments on the proposal and approved it without
modifications. The FCA's approval was published in the Federal Register
on October 20, 2010 (75 FR 64727).
In the supplementary information we provided when we published the
proposal for public comment, the FCA stated that the System banks and
the Funding Corporation intended also to make conforming changes to the
MAA to ensure that the MAA provisions did not impede operation of the
Reallocation Agreement. The FCA stated further that, should the Agency
approve the Reallocation Agreement, it expected also to approve the
conforming MAA Amendment and would publish it in the Federal Register.
The FCA published the current MAA in its entirety in the Federal
Register on January 15, 2003 (68 FR 2037). The current MAA establishes
certain financial thresholds at which conditions are placed on the
activities of a bank or a bank's access to participation in System-wide
and consolidated obligations is restricted. The MAA establishes three
categories, which are based on each bank's net collateral ratio,
permanent capital ratio, and scores under the Contractual Inter-bank
Performance Agreement, which is an agreement among the System banks and
the Funding Corporation that establishes certain financial performance
criteria.
Under the MAA, as a bank's financial condition declines, the bank
moves into Category I, then Category II, and finally Category III. When
a bank reaches Category I, it is required to provide certain additional
information, including information as to how it will improve its
financial condition, to the Monitoring and Advisory Committee, a
committee of bank and Funding Corporation representatives established
under the MAA. When a bank reaches Category II, in addition to being
required to provide additional information, the bank is limited to
joining in the issuance of System-wide and consolidated obligations
only in those amounts necessary for the bank to be able to roll over
its maturing debt. When the bank reaches Category III, the bank is
precluded from joining in the issuance of System-wide and consolidated
obligations.
The MAA includes provisions that enable a bank in Category II or
III to request the opportunity to continue its access to the market.
The MAA also provides that the FCA may override a decision to impose
Category III prohibitions on access to the market for a period of 60
days, which may be renewed for an additional 60-day period.
The MAA Amendment adds new sections 4.05, 5.05, and 7.23 to the
MAA. The MAA Amendment provides that, in a circumstance where the joint
[[Page 76730]]
and several payment provisions of the Reallocation Agreement have been
triggered, all non-defaulting System banks will be able to issue
System-wide obligations to fund payments under the Reallocation
Agreement. This means that even banks in Category II and III could
participate in such issuances. The MAA Amendment also provides that the
MAA and the Reallocation Agreement are separate agreements, and
invalidation of one does not affect the other.
The FCA now approves the MAA Amendment as set forth below. The
FCA's approval is conditioned on the board of directors of each bank
and the Funding Corporation approving the MAA Amendment. Neither the
MAA Amendment, when it becomes effective, nor FCA approval of it shall
in any way restrict or qualify the authority of the FCA or the Farm
Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) to exercise any of the
powers, rights, or duties granted by law to the FCA or the FCSIC.
Finally, the FCA retains the right to modify or revoke its approval of
the MAA, including the MAA Amendment, at any time.
The MAA Amendment, together with the recitals to the amendment, is
as follows:
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Market Access Agreement
This amendment to the amended and restated market access agreement
(the ``Amendment'') is made as of the [----] day of [--------------]
(the ``Effective Date''), by and among AgFirst Farm Credit Bank;
AgriBank, FCB; CoBank, ACB; the Farm Credit Bank of Texas; and the U.S.
AgBank, FCB (as successor to the Farm Credit Bank of Wichita and the
Western Farm Credit Bank under Section 7.12 of the Market Access
Agreement) (each, a ``Bank,'' and collectively, the ``Banks''), and the
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (the ``Funding
Corporation'').
Whereas, the Banks and the Funding Corporation desire to adopt a
contractual reallocation of each Bank's joint and several liability
obligations as an alternative to Section 4.4(a)(2) of the Farm Credit
Act of 1971, as amended (the ``Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement'');
Whereas, the Banks and the Funding Corporation desire to amend the
Amended and Restated Market Access Agreement dated July 1, 2003 (the
``Market Access Agreement'') in order to effectuate the intended
purpose of the Joint and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement;
Whereas, the boards of directors of the Banks and the Funding
Corporation gave approval to the Amendment subject to certain
conditions;
Whereas, the Amendment was submitted to the Farm Credit
Administration (the ``FCA'') for approval and to the Farm Credit System
Insurance Corporation (the ``Insurance Corporation'') for an expression
of no objection;
Whereas, the FCA published a description of this Amendment in
connection with the publication of the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement in the Federal Register on August 18, 2010 and
sought comments thereon;
Whereas, after receiving comments on the Joint and Several
Liability Reallocation Agreement,[\1\] the FCA, pursuant to the letter
dated ----, approved this Amendment subject to modifications, if any,
that are acceptable to the Banks and the Funding Corporation and a
notice of such approval was published in the Federal Register on [----
------------];
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that, although this paragraph states that the FCA
received comments on the Reallocation Agreement, we did not receive
comments on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereas, the Insurance Corporation, pursuant to the letter dated
[------], from the Insurance Corporation to the Banks and the Funding
Corporation, expressed no objection to this Amendment;
Now therefore, in consideration of the foregoing, the Banks and the
Funding Corporation, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree to
further amend the Market Access Agreement as follows:
Section 1.01 After current Section 4.04 of the Market Access
Agreement, add new Section 4.05, which reads as follows:
``Section 4.05. Relationship to the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement. A Category II Bank shall not be subject to
the Final Restrictions and Category II Interim Restrictions, to the
extent that the Final Restrictions and Category II Interim
Restrictions would prohibit such Category II Bank from issuing debt
required to fund such Category II Bank's liabilities and obligations
under the Joint and Several Liability Reallocation Agreement.''
Section 1.02 After current Section 5.04 of the Market Access
Agreement, add new Section 5.05, which reads as follows:
``Section 5.05. Relationship to the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement. A Category III Bank shall not be subject to
the Final Prohibition or Category III Interim Restrictions, to the
extent that the Final Prohibition or Category III Interim
Restrictions would prohibit such Category III Bank from issuing debt
required to fund such Category III Bank's liabilities and
obligations under the Joint and Several Liability Reallocation
Agreement.''
Section 1.03 After current Section 7.22 of the Market Access
Agreement, add new Section 7.23, which reads as follows:
``Section 7.23. Relationship to the Joint and Several Liability
Reallocation Agreement. This Restated MAA and the Joint and Several
Liability Reallocation Agreement are separate agreements, and
invalidation of one does not affect the other.''
Section 1.04 Continuation of Market Access Agreement. Except as
expressly provided in this Amendment, the Market Access Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Section 1.05 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but
all of which together shall constitute a single document.
In witness whereof, each party hereto has caused this Amendment to
be executed by its duly authorized officers or representatives, all as
of the date written below.
AGFIRST FARM CREDIT BANK
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AGRIBANK, FCB
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COBANK, ACB
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Farm Credit Bank of Texas
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. AGBANK, FCB
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 76731]]
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation
By:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: December 3, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-30930 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P