Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model Astra SPX, 1125 Westwind Astra, and Gulfstream 100 Airplanes, 76317-76319 [2010-30762]
Download as PDF
76317
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 235
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1164; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–057–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Israel Aircraft
Industries, Ltd.) Model Astra SPX, 1125
Westwind Astra, and Gulfstream 100
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Sponge rubber padding used to provide
separation between wheel well fuel lines and
electrical harnesses was discovered during
fleet maintenance. Use of this type of
padding for this purpose is not approved as
it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this
padding and install approved separation
means, fuel lines may be damaged by
corrosion and/or chafing resulting in an
unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206,
Mail Station D–25, Savannah, Georgia
31402–2206; telephone 800–810–4853;
fax 912–965–3520; e-mail
pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet https://
www.gulfstream.com/product_support/
technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2677; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–1164; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–057–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel
(CAAI), which is the aviation authority
for Israel, has issued Israeli
Airworthiness Directive 28–10–02–01,
dated February 22, 2010 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Sponge rubber padding used to provide
separation between wheel well fuel lines and
electrical harnesses was discovered during
fleet maintenance. Use of this type of
padding for this purpose is not approved as
it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this
padding and install approved separation
means, fuel lines may be damaged by
corrosion and/or chafing resulting in an
unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
Corrective actions include installing
loop clamps to correct improper
separation and removing sponge rubber
padding, and repair or replacement of
any corroded or chafed fuel lines found
after sponge rubber padding removal.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Gulfstream Aerospace LP has issued
Service Bulletin 100–28–297, dated
January 21, 2010. The actions described
in this service information are intended
to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
76318
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 130 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 25 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $100 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$289,250, or $2,225 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Gulfstream 100 airplanes, serial numbers 002
through 158 inclusive; certificated in any
category.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28: Fuel.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Israel Aircraft
Industries, Ltd.): Docket No. FAA–2010–
1164; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–
057–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
24, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Gulfstream
Aerospace LP (Type Certificate previously
held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model
Astra SPX, 1125 Westwind Astra, and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Sponge rubber padding used to provide
separation between wheel well fuel lines and
electrical harnesses was discovered during
fleet maintenance. Use of this type of
padding for this purpose is not approved as
it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this
padding and install approved separation
means, fuel lines may be damaged by
corrosion and/or chafing resulting in an
unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
Corrective actions include installing loop
clamps to correct improper separation,
removing sponge rubber padding, and repair
or replacement of any corroded or chafed fuel
lines found after sponge rubber padding
removal.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect for the presence of
sponge rubber padding on the fuel lines in
the wheel well area and inspect the fuel lines
and electrical harnesses in the wheel well
area for proper separation, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–28–297,
dated January 21, 2010.
(1) If any sponge rubber padding is found,
before further flight, remove all sponge
rubber padding from the fuel lines, inspect
the fuel lines that were covered with the
rubber padding for any corrosion and repair
or replace as applicable any corroded or
chafed fuel lines, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
Service Bulletin 100–28–297, dated January
21, 2010.
(2) If any fuel lines and electrical harnesses
are found to not have proper separation,
before further flight, install loop clamps in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Gulfstream Service Bulletin
100–28–297, dated January 21, 2010.
(3) If proper separation is found, and no
sponge rubber padding is found, no further
action is required by this paragraph.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
(1) Where Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–
28–297, dated January 21, 2010, specifies to
submit a photo of any sponge rubber padding
that is found to the manufacturer, this AD
does not require that action.
(2) Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–28–
297, dated January 21, 2010, instructs
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
operators to contact Gulfstream if technical
assistance is required. However, any
deviation from the instructions provided in
that service bulletin must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this
AD.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic And Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[0908041219–0073–01]
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Mike Borfitz,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2677; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness
Directive 28–10–02–01, dated February 22,
2010; and Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100–
28–297, dated January 21, 2010; for related
information.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 1, 2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–30762 Filed 12–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Dec 07, 2010
Jkt 223001
76319
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra Malek, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West Highway,
11th floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910,
(301) 713–3125 Ext. 262.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0648–AX79
Electronic Access
Amendments to National Marine
Sanctuary Regulations Regarding Low
Overflights in Designated Zones
This Federal Register document is
also accessible via the Internet at https://
www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/aces/
aces140.html.
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), Department of Commerce
(DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
public comments.
AGENCY:
NOAA proposes to amend the
regulations of the Channel Islands,
Monterey Bay, Gulf of the Farallones,
and Olympic Coast national marine
sanctuaries relating to sanctuary
overflights. Specifically, NOAA
proposes to: amend the regulations
requiring that motorized aircraft
maintain certain minimum altitudes
above specified locations within the
boundaries of the listed sanctuaries; and
state that failure to comply with these
altitude limits is presumed to disturb
marine mammals or seabirds and is a
violation of the sanctuary regulations.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
may be made until January 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 0648–AX79 by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Debra Malek, Office of
National Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 EastWest Highway, 11th floor, Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
ONMS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) authorizes NOAA to prohibit or
otherwise regulate activities to prevent
or minimize the destruction of, loss of,
or injury to a resource or quality of a
national marine sanctuary (16 U.S.C.
1436(1)).
Regulations for the Monterey Bay,
Channel Islands, Gulf of the Farallones
and Olympic Coast National Marine
Sanctuaries all restrict low altitude
overflights within specified zones in
each sanctuary (subject to certain
exceptions) in order to protect marine
mammals and seabirds from disturbance
by aircraft. At Monterey Bay, Channel
Islands, and Gulf of the Farallones,
flights below 1000 feet are restricted
within the designated zones. At
Olympic Coast, flights below 2000 feet
are restricted within one nautical mile
of Flattery Rocks, Quillayute Needles, or
Copalis National Wildlife Refuge, or
within one nautical mile seaward from
the coastal boundary of the sanctuary.
These restrictions vary slightly with
each sanctuary. The regulations for the
Monterey Bay and Olympic Coast
sanctuaries prohibit overflights below a
certain level within designated zones—
1000 feet in Monterey Bay and 2000 feet
in Olympic Coast, as noted above—
without requiring a specific showing
that marine mammals or seabirds have
been disturbed. The regulations for the
Channel Islands and the Gulf of the
Farallones prohibit disturbing marine
mammals or seabirds by flying below
1000 feet within specified zones of the
sanctuaries.
With this proposed rule, NOAA seeks
to standardize the application of these
restrictions by adopting a single,
consistent and clearer regulatory
approach regarding overflights in these
sanctuaries. As proposed, the
regulations for each sanctuary would
establish a rebuttable presumption that
flying motorized aircraft at less than
established altitudes within any of the
existing zones results in the disturbance
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76317-76319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30762]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 76317]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1164; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-057-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model
Astra SPX, 1125 Westwind Astra, and Gulfstream 100 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Sponge rubber padding used to provide separation between wheel
well fuel lines and electrical harnesses was discovered during fleet
maintenance. Use of this type of padding for this purpose is not
approved as it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this padding and install approved
separation means, fuel lines may be damaged by corrosion and/or
chafing resulting in an unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 24,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Mail Station D-25,
Savannah, Georgia 31402-2206; telephone 800-810-4853; fax 912-965-3520;
e-mail pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet https://www.gulfstream.com/product_support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2677; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1164;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-057-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), which is the
aviation authority for Israel, has issued Israeli Airworthiness
Directive 28-10-02-01, dated February 22, 2010 (referred to after this
as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Sponge rubber padding used to provide separation between wheel
well fuel lines and electrical harnesses was discovered during fleet
maintenance. Use of this type of padding for this purpose is not
approved as it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this padding and install approved
separation means, fuel lines may be damaged by corrosion and/or
chafing resulting in an unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
Corrective actions include installing loop clamps to correct
improper separation and removing sponge rubber padding, and repair or
replacement of any corroded or chafed fuel lines found after sponge
rubber padding removal. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Gulfstream Aerospace LP has issued Service Bulletin 100-28-297,
dated January 21, 2010. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this
[[Page 76318]]
AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 130 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 25 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $100 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $289,250, or $2,225 per product.\
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held by Israel
Aircraft Industries, Ltd.): Docket No. FAA-2010-1164; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NM-057-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 24, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
previously held by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model Astra
SPX, 1125 Westwind Astra, and Gulfstream 100 airplanes, serial
numbers 002 through 158 inclusive; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Sponge rubber padding used to provide separation between wheel
well fuel lines and electrical harnesses was discovered during fleet
maintenance. Use of this type of padding for this purpose is not
approved as it is liable to cause corrosion of the fuel lines.
Unless steps are taken to remove this padding and install approved
separation means, fuel lines may be damaged by corrosion and/or
chafing resulting in an unsafe condition due to fuel leakage[, which
could result in a fire] in the wheel well area.
Corrective actions include installing loop clamps to correct
improper separation, removing sponge rubber padding, and repair or
replacement of any corroded or chafed fuel lines found after sponge
rubber padding removal.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect for the presence of sponge rubber padding on the fuel lines
in the wheel well area and inspect the fuel lines and electrical
harnesses in the wheel well area for proper separation, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
Service Bulletin 100-28-297, dated January 21, 2010.
(1) If any sponge rubber padding is found, before further
flight, remove all sponge rubber padding from the fuel lines,
inspect the fuel lines that were covered with the rubber padding for
any corrosion and repair or replace as applicable any corroded or
chafed fuel lines, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-28-297, dated
January 21, 2010.
(2) If any fuel lines and electrical harnesses are found to not
have proper separation, before further flight, install loop clamps
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
Service Bulletin 100-28-297, dated January 21, 2010.
(3) If proper separation is found, and no sponge rubber padding
is found, no further action is required by this paragraph.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) Where Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-28-297, dated January
21, 2010, specifies to submit a photo of any sponge rubber padding
that is found to the manufacturer, this AD does not require that
action.
(2) Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-28-297, dated January 21,
2010, instructs
[[Page 76319]]
operators to contact Gulfstream if technical assistance is required.
However, any deviation from the instructions provided in that
service bulletin must be approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Mike
Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2677; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness Directive 28-10-02-01,
dated February 22, 2010; and Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-28-297,
dated January 21, 2010; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 1, 2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-30762 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P