Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes, 75870-75872 [2010-30309]
Download as PDF
75870
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) For all S/N: Incorporate Diamond Aircraft
¨
Temporary Revision TR–MAM 40–428, page
3–37b, dated April 30, 2010, into the FAA-approved airplane flight manual.
(2) For Model DA 40, S/N 40.006 through
40.009, 40.011 through 40.081, 40.084, and
40.201 through 40.749; and Model DA 40F
S/N 40.FC001 through 40.FC009: Replace
the rear passenger door retaining bracket
with an improved design retaining bracket.
Within 6 months after January 11, 2011 (the
effective date of this AD).
Follow Diamond Aircraft Temporary Revision
¨
TR–MAM 40–428, Cover Page, dated April
30, 2010.
Within 6 months after January 11, 2011 (the
effective date of this AD).
Follow Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Mandatory Service Bulletin NO. MSB 40–
070/NO. MSB D4–079/NO. MSB F4–024,
dated April 30, 2010; and Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Work Instruction WI–MSB
40–070/WI–MSB D4–079/WI–MSB F4–024,
dated April 30, 2010.
to the attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your Principal Maintenance Inspector
or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District.
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816) 329–
4090; e-mail: mike.kiesov@faa.gov.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Standards Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it
Related Information
(h) For more information about this AD,
contact Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer,
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information
contained in table 1 of this AD to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
TABLE 1—ALL MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Revision
Diamond Aircraft Tem¨
porary Revision TR–MAM
40–428, Cover Page and
page 3–37b.
Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH Mandatory Service
Bulletin NO. MSB 40–
070/NO. MSB D4–079/
NO. MSB F4–024.
Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH Work Instruction
WI–MSB 40–070/WI–
MSB D4–079/WI–MSB
F4–024.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Document
Not Applicable ................................................................................................................................
April 30, 2010.
Not Applicable ................................................................................................................................
April 30, 2010.
0 .....................................................................................................................................................
April 30, 2010.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information contained in table 1
of this AD under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra+e 5, A–2700 Wiener
Neustadt, Austria, telephone: +43 2622
26700; fax: +43 2622 26780; e-mail:
office@diamond-air.at; Internet: https://
www.diamond-air.at.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
816–329–4148.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Dec 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
Date
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
November 23, 2010.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–30199 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0850; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–076–AD; Amendment
39–16536; AD 2010–25–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
In accordance with design regulation, the
THSA [trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load
paths, a Primary Load Path (PLP) and a
Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only
engaged in case of PLP failure. Following the
design intent, engagement of the SLP leads to
jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the
PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured
during representative flights have
demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged,
it does not systematically jam the THSA. In
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
addition, laboratory tests have confirmed that
the SLP will only withstand the loads for a
limited period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an
extended period of time, if not detected and
corrected, would lead to the rupture of the
THSA upper attachment and consequent
THSA loss of command, resulting in reduced
control of the aeroplane.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
January 11, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of January 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on August 27, 2010 (75 FR
52652). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
In accordance with design regulation, the
THSA [trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load
paths, a Primary Load Path (PLP) and a
Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only
engaged in case of PLP failure. Following the
design intent, engagement of the SLP leads to
jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the
PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured
during representative flights have
demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged,
it does not systematically jam the THSA. In
addition, laboratory tests have confirmed that
the SLP will only withstand the loads for a
limited period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an
extended period of time, if not detected and
corrected, would lead to the rupture of the
THSA upper attachment and consequent
THSA loss of command, resulting in reduced
control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons stated above, this [EASA]
AD requires repetitive [detailed] inspections
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Dec 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
to detect if damage exists to the THSA upper
attachment and if the SLP has been engaged
and corrective actions, depending on
findings.
The corrective actions include
contacting Airbus for instructions and
doing those instructions. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 5
products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $850, or $170 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75871
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
75872
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 7, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
(i) Doing the corrective actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD is not a terminating
action for the repetitive inspections required
by paragraph (g) of this AD.
2010–25–03 Airbus: Amendment 39–16536.
Docket No. FAA–2010–0850; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–076–AD.
FAA AD Differences
§ 39.13
[Amended]
■
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective January 11, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300
B2–1A, B2–1C, B4–2C, B2K–3C, B4–103, B2–
203, and B4–203 airplanes, certificated in
any category, all serial numbers.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27: Flight Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
In accordance with design regulation, the
THSA [trimmable horizontal stabilizer
actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load
paths, a Primary Load Path (PLP) and a
Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only
engaged in case of PLP failure. Following the
design intent, engagement of the SLP leads to
jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the
PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured
during representative flights have
demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged,
it does not systematically jam the THSA. In
addition, laboratory tests have confirmed that
the SLP will only withstand the loads for a
limited period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an
extended period of time, if not detected and
corrected, would lead to the rupture of the
THSA upper attachment and consequent
THSA loss of command, resulting in reduced
control of the aeroplane.
*
*
*
*
*
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2010–
0019, dated February 5, 2010; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–27–0203,
dated June 8, 2009; for related information.
Actions
(g) Within 2,500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, do a detailed visual
inspection for metallic particles, cracks,
scratches, and missing materials of the THSA
upper attachment and screw shaft, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–27–0203, dated June 8, 2009.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 2,500 flight hours.
(h) If during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, any metallic
particle, crack, scratch, or missing material is
found, before further flight, contact Airbus to
obtain approved corrective action
instructions, and accomplish those
instructions accordingly.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–27–0203, excluding Appendix
01, dated June 8, 2009, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS–EAW
(Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Dec 06, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
22, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–30309 Filed 12–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0934; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–113–AD; Amendment
39–16537; AD 2010–25–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Corporation Model DC–9–30,
DC–9–40, and DC–9–50 Series
Airplanes, Model DC–9–81 (MD–81),
DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83),
and DC–9–87 (MD–87) Airplanes, and
Model MD–88 and MD–90–30 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
airplanes listed above. This AD requires
modifying the fuel boost pumps for the
center wing, and forward or aft auxiliary
fuel tanks. This AD results from fuel
system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to
prevent possible sources of ignition in a
fuel tank caused by an electrical fault in
the fuel boost pumps. An ignition
source in the fuel tank could result in
a fire or an explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective January 11,
2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of January 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For Boeing service
information identified in this AD,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 7, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75870-75872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30309]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0850; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-076-AD;
Amendment 39-16536; AD 2010-25-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
In accordance with design regulation, the THSA [trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load paths, a Primary Load Path
(PLP) and a Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only engaged in case
of PLP failure. Following the design intent, engagement of the SLP
leads to jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured during representative
flights have demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged, it does not
systematically jam the THSA. In
[[Page 75871]]
addition, laboratory tests have confirmed that the SLP will only
withstand the loads for a limited period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an extended period of time,
if not detected and corrected, would lead to the rupture of the THSA
upper attachment and consequent THSA loss of command, resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective January 11, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 11,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 27, 2010 (75
FR 52652). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
In accordance with design regulation, the THSA [trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load paths, a Primary Load Path
(PLP) and a Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only engaged in case
of PLP failure. Following the design intent, engagement of the SLP
leads to jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured during representative
flights have demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged, it does not
systematically jam the THSA. In addition, laboratory tests have
confirmed that the SLP will only withstand the loads for a limited
period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an extended period of time,
if not detected and corrected, would lead to the rupture of the THSA
upper attachment and consequent THSA loss of command, resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
For the reasons stated above, this [EASA] AD requires repetitive
[detailed] inspections to detect if damage exists to the THSA upper
attachment and if the SLP has been engaged and corrective actions,
depending on findings.
The corrective actions include contacting Airbus for instructions and
doing those instructions. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 5 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $850, or $170 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 75872]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-25-03 Airbus: Amendment 39-16536. Docket No. FAA-2010-0850;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-076-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
11, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B4-2C,
B2K-3C, B4-103, B2-203, and B4-203 airplanes, certificated in any
category, all serial numbers.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
In accordance with design regulation, the THSA [trimmable
horizontal stabilizer actuator] has a failsafe design. Its upper
attachment to the aeroplane has two load paths, a Primary Load Path
(PLP) and a Secondary Load Path (SLP), which is only engaged in case
of PLP failure. Following the design intent, engagement of the SLP
leads to jam the THSA, indicating the failure of the PLP.
Tests carried out under the loads-measured during representative
flights have demonstrated that, when the SLP is engaged, it does not
systematically jam the THSA. In addition, laboratory tests have
confirmed that the SLP will only withstand the loads for a limited
period of time.
This condition of PLP failure during an extended period of time,
if not detected and corrected, would lead to the rupture of the THSA
upper attachment and consequent THSA loss of command, resulting in
reduced control of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 2,500 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, do a detailed visual inspection for metallic particles, cracks,
scratches, and missing materials of the THSA upper attachment and
screw shaft, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27-0203, dated June 8, 2009.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,500
flight hours.
(h) If during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, any metallic particle, crack, scratch, or missing material is
found, before further flight, contact Airbus to obtain approved
corrective action instructions, and accomplish those instructions
accordingly.
(i) Doing the corrective actions specified in paragraph (h) of
this AD is not a terminating action for the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2010-0019, dated February 5, 2010; and Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-27-0203, dated June 8, 2009; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-27-0203,
excluding Appendix 01, dated June 8, 2009, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS-EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 22, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-30309 Filed 12-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P