Safety Zone; “Contagion” Movie Filming, Calumet River, Chicago, IL, 73960-73962 [2010-30146]
Download as PDF
73960
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–1013]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; ‘‘Contagion’’ Movie
Filming, Calumet River, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Calumet River near Chicago, Illinois.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of the Calumet River due
to the filming of a movie involving high
speed boat chases and other dangerous
stunts on the water. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the stunts that
will be performed on the river during
the filming of this movie.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
on December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m. on
December 12, 2010. This rule will be
enforced from 7 a.m. on December 11,
2010 until 7 a.m. on December 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
1013 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–1013 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan,
at 414–747–7154 or
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Nov 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when an agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under U.S.C. 553
(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because the final
details for this event were not submitted
to the Coast Guard until October 27,
2010. As such, it is impracticable to
provide a full comment period due to
lack of time. In addition, given the high
risks of injury and damage that will be
created during the filming of the movie
Contagion, a delay in enacting this
safety zone would be contrary to the
public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. A 30-day notice period is not
possible for the same reasons that
publishing an NPRM was not possible.
Due to the high risks of personal injury
and property damage that will be
created during the filming of the movie
Contagion, delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels from the
hazards associated with the filming of
the motion picture Contagion. The
filming of dangerous boat chases and
other stunts on the water poses serious
risks of injury to persons and property.
As such, the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, has determined that the
filming of this motion picture does pose
significant risks to public safety and
property and that a safety zone is
necessary.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will encompass all
U.S. navigable waters of the Calumet
River in the vicinity of the South
Torrence Avenue Bridge between Mile
Marker 329.0 and Mile Marker 327.5 of
the Calumet River in Chicago, IL.
[DATUM: NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her onscene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the zones’ activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor on
a portion of the Calumet River between
7 a.m. on December 11, 2010 until
7 a.m. on December 12, 2010.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will
only be enforced while unsafe
conditions exist. The Coast Guard also
expects that traffic will generally be
very low based on the time of year that
this closure will occur.
In the event that this temporary safety
zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of The Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative to transit through the
safety zone. The Coast Guard will give
notice to the public via a Broadcast to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Nov 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73961
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone and is therefore categorically
excluded under paragraph 34(g) of the
Instruction. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone that will be effective for less than
twenty four hours. As such, it fits
within the categorical exclusion for
safety zones.
A final environmental analysis
checklist and categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. A new temporary § 165.T09–1013 is
added as follows:
■
§ 165.T09–1013 Safety Zone; Contagion
Movie Filming, Calumet River, Chicago,
Illinois
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all U.S. navigable waters of
the Calumet River in the vicinity of the
South Torrence Avenue Bridge between
Mile Marker 329.0 and Mile Marker
327.5 of the Calumet River in Chicago,
IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
73962
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Effective period. This regulation is
effective from 7 a.m. on December 11,
2010 until 7 a.m. on December 12, 2010.
This regulation will be enforced from 7
a.m. on December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m.
on December 12, 2010. The Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or
her on-scene representative may
suspend and restart the enforcement of
the safety zone at any time.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, to act
on his or her behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, will be on land
in the vicinity of the safety zone and
will have constant communications
with the Chicago Marine Unit vessels
that will be on-scene to assist the Coast
Guard in enforcing the safety zone.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. The Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her on-scene representative.
Dated: November 17, 2010.
S.R. Schenk,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2010–30146 Filed 11–29–10; 8:45 am]
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–1043]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Bridge Demolition; Illinois
River, Seneca, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Illinois River near Seneca, Illinois.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of the Illinois River due
to the demolition of the Seneca
Highway Bridge. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the demolition
of the Seneca Highway Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on November 30, 2010 through 6 a.m.
on December 11, 2010. This rule is
effective with actual notice for purposes
of enforcement on 6 a.m. on November
18, 2010 through 6 a.m. on November
19, 2010. This rule will be enforced
again from 6 a.m. on December 2, 2010
through 6 a.m. on December 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
1043 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–1043 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan,
at 414–747–7154 or
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:07 Nov 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when an agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable as the final details for this
demolition were not received by the
Coast Guard until November 9, 2010.
Furthermore, the Coast Guard has
reached out to potentially affected
waterway users and has determined that
potential impacts as a result of this
safety zone will be minimal. Given the
short time frame, low impact of the
zone, and hazards associated with a
bridge demolition, delaying the
enactment of this rule would be
contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. A 30 day notice period is
impracticable given the short time frame
for enacting this regulation. Given the
hazards created by a bridge demolition,
delaying the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels from the
hazards associated with the demolition
of the Seneca Highway Bridge. The
detonation of explosives and the falling
debris associated with the demolition of
this bridge pose serious risks of injury
to persons and property. As such, the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, has determined that the
demolition of the Seneca Highway
Bridge does pose significant risks to
public safety and property and that a
safety zone is necessary.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will encompass all
U.S. navigable waters of the Illinois
River in the vicinity of Seneca Highway
Bridge between Mile Marker 252.5 and
Mile Marker 253.0 of the Illinois River
in Seneca, IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73960-73962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30146]
[[Page 73960]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-1013]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; ``Contagion'' Movie Filming, Calumet River, Chicago,
IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Calumet River near Chicago, Illinois. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Calumet River due to the filming of a
movie involving high speed boat chases and other dangerous stunts on
the water. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated with the
stunts that will be performed on the river during the filming of this
movie.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on December 11, 2010 until 7
a.m. on December 12, 2010. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. on
December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m. on December 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-1013 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-1013 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at 414-747-7154 or Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when an agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under U.S.C. 553 (b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the final details for this event were
not submitted to the Coast Guard until October 27, 2010. As such, it is
impracticable to provide a full comment period due to lack of time. In
addition, given the high risks of injury and damage that will be
created during the filming of the movie Contagion, a delay in enacting
this safety zone would be contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. A 30-day notice period is not
possible for the same reasons that publishing an NPRM was not possible.
Due to the high risks of personal injury and property damage that will
be created during the filming of the movie Contagion, delaying the
effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect vessels from the
hazards associated with the filming of the motion picture Contagion.
The filming of dangerous boat chases and other stunts on the water
poses serious risks of injury to persons and property. As such, the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, has determined that the
filming of this motion picture does pose significant risks to public
safety and property and that a safety zone is necessary.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable waters of the
Calumet River in the vicinity of the South Torrence Avenue Bridge
between Mile Marker 329.0 and Mile Marker 327.5 of the Calumet River in
Chicago, IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her
on-scene representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene representative. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zones'
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor on a portion of the Calumet River between 7 a.m. on
December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m. on December 12, 2010.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will only be enforced while unsafe conditions exist. The Coast
Guard also expects that traffic will generally be very low based on the
time of year that this closure will occur.
In the event that this temporary safety zone affects shipping,
commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of The Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene representative to transit
through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public
via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in effect.
[[Page 73961]]
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone and is therefore categorically excluded under paragraph
34(g) of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone that will be effective for less than twenty four
hours. As such, it fits within the categorical exclusion for safety
zones.
A final environmental analysis checklist and categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-1013 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-1013 Safety Zone; Contagion Movie Filming, Calumet
River, Chicago, Illinois
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable
waters of the Calumet River in the vicinity of the South Torrence
Avenue Bridge between Mile Marker 329.0 and Mile Marker 327.5 of the
Calumet River in Chicago, IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
[[Page 73962]]
(b) Effective period. This regulation is effective from 7 a.m. on
December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m. on December 12, 2010. This regulation
will be enforced from 7 a.m. on December 11, 2010 until 7 a.m. on
December 12, 2010. The Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or
his or her on-scene representative may suspend and restart the
enforcement of the safety zone at any time.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, to act on his or her behalf. The on-scene representative of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, will be on land in the
vicinity of the safety zone and will have constant communications with
the Chicago Marine Unit vessels that will be on-scene to assist the
Coast Guard in enforcing the safety zone.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or
his or her on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene representative.
Dated: November 17, 2010.
S.R. Schenk,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan,
Acting.
[FR Doc. 2010-30146 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P