Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges, Coos, Tillamook, and Lincoln Counties, OR; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment, 73121-73123 [2010-30063]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Activity
Number of
responses
Completion time
per response
73121
Total annual
burden hours
FWS Form 3–XXXX .........................................................................
FWS Form 3–YYYY .........................................................................
1,200
300
1,200
300
4 hours
4 hours
4,800
1,200
Totals ........................................................................................
15,000
15,000
............................
19,500
III. Comments
We invite comments concerning this
information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: November 23, 2010.
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29977 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
[FWS–R1–R–2010–N230; 10137–1265–0000
S3]
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and
Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges,
Coos, Tillamook, and Lincoln
Counties, OR; Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent; announcement
of three public open house meetings;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan (CCP) for the Bandon Marsh,
Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National
Wildlife Refuges (NWRs), in or near the
towns of Bandon, Pacific City,
Neskowin, and Lincoln City, Oregon.
We will also prepare an environmental
assessment (EA) to evaluate the
potential effects of various CCP
alternatives. We provide this notice in
compliance with our CCP policy to
advise other Federal and State agencies,
Tribes, and the public of our intentions
and to obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to
consider during the planning process.
We are also announcing public meetings
and requesting public comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by
December 31, 2010. We will hold public
meetings to begin the CCP planning
process; see Public Meetings under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for dates,
times, and locations.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: oregoncoastCCP@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay,
and Siletz Bay CCP’’ in the subject line
of the message.
Fax: Attn: Project Leader, 541–867–
4551.
U.S. Mail: Oregon Coast National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2127 SE.
Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR
97365.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off
comments during regular business hours
at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy
W. Lowe, Project Leader, Oregon Coast
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2127
SE. Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR
97365; phone (541) 867–4550, and fax
(541) 867–4551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate our
process for developing a CCP for
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz
Bay National Wildlife Refuges in Coos,
Tillamook, and Lincoln Counties,
Oregon. This notice complies with our
CCP policy to (1) advise other Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and State agencies, Tribes, and the
public of our intention to conduct
detailed planning on these refuges, and
(2) obtain suggestions and information
on the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. We
will review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Refuge Administration Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife
Refuge System was established for
specific purposes. These purposes are
the foundation for developing and
prioritizing the conservation and
management goals and objectives for
each refuge within the National Wildlife
Refuge System, and determining
compatible public uses for each refuge.
The planning process is a way for us
and the public to evaluate management
goals and objectives for refuge wildlife,
plant, and habitat conservation, while
providing for wildlife-dependent
recreation opportunities that are
compatible with the refuge’s
establishing purposes and the mission
of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
Our CCP process provides
participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies;
organizations; and the public. At this
time we encourage input in the form of
issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions
for the future management of Bandon
Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay
Refuges.
We will conduct an environmental
review of this project and prepare an EA
in accordance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73122
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
4321 et seq.); NEPA regulations (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508); other appropriate
Federal laws and regulations; and our
policies and procedures for compliance
with those laws and regulations.
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and
Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges
Bandon Marsh NWR was established
in 1983, with the acquisition of 289
acres of salt marsh, mudflats, and tidal
sloughs. The Bandon Marsh Unit is
located near the mouth of the Coquille
River, with approximately 75 percent of
the Unit within the city limits of
Bandon, Oregon. The 582-acre Niles’tun Unit, established in 2000,
includes 400 acres of historic salt marsh
that is currently being restored to tidal
action. The Ni-les’tun Unit is located on
the east side of Highway 101 on the
north bank of the Coquille River. The
total land base of Bandon Marsh NWR
is 889 acres.
The purpose for establishing Bandon
Marsh NWR was ‘‘for the preservation
and enhancement of the highly
significant wildlife habitat of the area
known as Bandon Marsh, in the estuary
of the Coquille River * * * for the
protection of migratory waterfowl,
numerous species of shorebirds, and
fish, including Chinook and silver
salmon, and to provide opportunity for
wildlife-oriented recreation and nature
study on the marsh * * *’’ (95 Stat.
1709, dated Dec 29, 1981). The Niles’tun Unit was added to Bandon
Marsh NWR in order to (1) protect and
restore intertidal marsh, freshwater
marsh, and riparian areas to provide a
diversity of habitats for migratory birds,
including waterfowl, shorebirds, wading
birds, and songbirds; (2) restore
intertidal marsh habitat for anadromous
fish such as the threatened coho salmon,
chinook, chum salmon, steelhead, and
cutthroat trout; (3) protect and restore
habitat for species listed under the
Endangered Species Act as threatened
or endangered; and (4) provide wildlifedependent public use opportunities
compatible with refuge purposes.
Nestucca Bay NWR is located near
Pacific City and Neskowin in Tillamook
County, Oregon. The refuge was
established in 1991 with the acquisition
of a 384-acre dairy farm, and has since
expanded to 818.5 acres. The primary
need for establishing Nestucca Bay
NWR was to protect high-quality coastal
habitats for dusky Canada geese and
threatened Aleutian Canada geese
(delisted in 2001); other endangered and
threatened species; and a variety of
other migratory waterfowl, shorebirds,
raptors, songbirds, anadromous fish,
and other wildlife while preserving part
of Oregon’s biodiversity. In 2002, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
refuge was expanded to include the
Neskowin Marsh Unit (222.6 acres
acquired), located about 2.5 miles south
of the Nestucca Bay Refuge Unit near
the community of Neskowin, Oregon.
Neskowin Marsh incorporates unique
freshwater wetland and bog habitats and
wildlife resources not found within the
initial refuge boundary.
Siletz Bay NWR is located near
Lincoln City on the central coast of
Oregon. The refuge was established in
1991 with a donation of 46 acres of
tidally muted salt marsh. The approved
acquisition refuge boundary totals 1,936
acres and encompasses the northern tip
of the Siletz spit, vegetated and
unvegetated tidelands of the bay, and a
portion of the diked former tidelands of
the Siletz River floodplain.
Approximately 1,060 acres within the
authorized boundary are State-owned
tidelands. Currently, refuge lands total
568 acres. The primary need for
establishing this refuge was to protect
coastal wetland habitats and upland
buffers for a variety of waterfowl,
shorebirds, marine mammals,
endangered species, raptors, songbirds,
fish, and other wildlife. The refuge
serves to protect the remaining coastal
wetlands and uplands adjacent to Siletz
Bay from rapidly encroaching
development, and management
emphasis has been to enhance and
restore wetland and upland habitats for
a variety of estuarine-dependent fish
and wildlife species.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns,
and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary
issues, concerns, and opportunities that
we may address in the CCP. We have
briefly summarized these issues below.
During public scoping, we may identify
additional issues.
Bandon Marsh NWR Preliminary
Issues: What actions should the Service
take to sustain and restore priority
species and habitats on this refuge over
the next 15 years? Based upon the
refuge’s priority fish and wildlife
species, which habitats would be
monitored and managed to control
invasive species? What management
options should the refuge consider for
restoration of the degraded upland
forest and grassland? What possibilities
exist for enhancing existing or adding
additional wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities, including
wildlife observation trails and/or
photography points? Which areas/
habitats of the refuge should be
managed as undisturbed wildlife
sanctuary areas (closed to the public)
and which areas should be open to
public use? Should the refuge consider
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
changes to the Bandon Marsh NWR
waterfowl hunting program? Would
allowing hunting and other wildlifedependent recreational uses in new
areas (e.g., Ni-les’tun Unit) have
detrimental effects on the refuge’s
ability to provide adequate undisturbed
quality wintering habitat for waterfowl
and other wildlife? Is there enough use
of the refuge by migrating waterfowl to
provide a quality hunting program?
Nestucca Bay NWR Preliminary
Issues: What actions should the Service
take to sustain and restore priority
species and habitats on this refuge over
the next 15 years? Based upon the
refuge’s priority fish and wildlife
species, which are the priority habitats
to monitor for invasive species, and
what is the range of Integrated Pest
Management strategies that should be
considered to reduce the incidence and
spread of invasive species? Should the
Service consider restoring some
pastures at Nestucca Bay NWR to tidal
marsh, and what effect would this have
on the refuge’s ability to provide
wintering habitat for geese and reduce
goose depredation on neighboring
private lands? Should the Cannery Hill
Unit at Nestucca Bay NWR be managed
specifically to restore former coastal
prairie, and if so, how much emphasis
should be placed on specific needs of
the threatened Oregon silverspot
butterfly within a larger coastal prairie
restoration plan? What options should
be considered for the old roadbed
through Neskowin Marsh (tsunami
escape route) if it is found to be
impacting water flows through
Neskowin Marsh? Should the Service
consider designating Neskowin Marsh
as a Research Natural Area? What
possibilities exist for adding or
enhancing existing wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities on Nestucca
Bay NWR? Are existing refuge access
points and uses adequate and do they
provide a quality experience? Should
the refuge consider establishing
waterfowl hunting programs at Nestucca
Bay NWR? Can the level of migrating
waterfowl use on Nestucca Bay NWR
support a quality hunting program?
Siletz Bay NWR Preliminary Issues:
What actions should the Service take to
sustain and restore priority species and
habitats on this refuge over the next 15
years? Based upon the refuge’s priority
fish and wildlife species, which habitats
are most important to monitor for
invasive species? What partnering
possibilities exist for treatment of
aquatic invasive species such as smooth
cordgrass and New Zealand mud snail?
Can wetlands currently hampered by
fish passage barriers and other issues be
restored, and if so, how should the
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
Service prioritize them? What
opportunities exist for adding or
enhancing existing wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities and access
points? Which areas of the refuge
should be managed as undisturbed
sanctuary areas and which areas should
be considered for public access? Should
the refuge consider establishing a
waterfowl hunting program at Siletz Bay
NWR? Would waterfowl hunting and
other wildlife-dependent recreational
activities have detrimental effects on the
refuge’s ability to provide adequate
undisturbed quality wintering habitat
for waterfowl? Is there enough use of the
refuge by migrating waterfowl to
support a quality hunting program?
Should the refuge consider enhancing
the currently offered seasonal
73123
opportunities to observe wildlife via
guided canoe/kayak excursion through
the refuge?
Public Meetings
We will hold the following public
meetings. For more information, contact
the person under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Date
Time
Location
November 29, 2010 ...............................................................................
6–9 p.m. ..
November 30, 2010 ...............................................................................
6–9 p.m. ..
December 2, 2010 .................................................................................
6–9 p.m. ..
Lincoln City Community Center, 2150 NE. Oar Place, Lincoln City, OR 97367.
Kiawanda Community Center, 34600 Cape Kiawanda
Drive, Pacific City, OR 97135.
Bandon Community Center, 1200 11th Street SW.,
Bandon, OR 97411.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
available for release. The BLM
subsequently determined that additional
information should have been included
in the cumulative impact section of the
EA. The BLM will be issuing a revised
EA, which will be available for a 30-day
comment period upon completion. After
the end of the comment period, the BLM
will hold a public hearing on the EA,
the fair market value and the maximum
economic recovery of the proposed
leased tract.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt
M. Barton, Land Law Examiner, 2850
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215
at (303) 239–3714,
Kurt_Barton@blm.gov, or Jennifer
Maiolo, Mining Engineer, 455 Emerson
Street, Craig, CO 81625 at 970–826–
5077, Jennifer_Maiolo@blm.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010–30063 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2010–29864 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Land Management
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
[LLCO–921000–L13200000–EL0000–
LVELC10CC770; COC–74219]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Notice of Correction to Notice of
Availability of the Environmental
Assessment and Notice of Public
Hearing for the Sage Creek Holdings,
LLC, Federal Coal Lease Application,
COC–74219
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Correction.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is correcting the
Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Notice of Public Hearing for the Sage
Creek Holdings, LLC, Federal Coal Lease
Application, COC–74219 published in
the Federal Register on August 13, 2010
[75 FR 49512]. The BLM incorrectly
stated that the EA was complete and
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
National Park Service
[2462–PYB]
Information Collection Sent to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; OMB Control
Number 1024–0022; Backcountry Use
Permit
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service,
NPS) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the
ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. This ICR is scheduled to expire on
November 30, 2010. We may not
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
However, under OMB regulations, we
may continue to conduct or sponsor this
information collection while it is
pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before December 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or
OIRA_DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail).
Please provide a copy of your comments
to Garry Oye, Chief of Wilderness
Stewardship Division, National Park
Service, 1201 Eye Street NW., (Room
1004), Washington DC 20005; via fax at
(202) 371–6623; or via e-mail at
Garry_Oye@nps.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Garry Oye by mail, fax,
or e-mail (see ADDRESSES) or by phone
at (202) 513–7090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 1024–0022.
Title: Backcountry Use Permit (36
CFR 1.5, 1.6, and 2.10).
Form Number: 10–404A.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals wishing to use backcountry
areas within national parks.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
285,000.
Estimated Number of Responses:
285,000.
Completion Time per Response: 0.083
hours.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73121-73123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30063]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2010-N230; 10137-1265-0000 S3]
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National Wildlife
Refuges, Coos, Tillamook, and Lincoln Counties, OR; Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent; announcement of three public open house
meetings; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for the Bandon Marsh,
Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs), in or
near the towns of Bandon, Pacific City, Neskowin, and Lincoln City,
Oregon. We will also prepare an environmental assessment (EA) to
evaluate the potential effects of various CCP alternatives. We provide
this notice in compliance with our CCP policy to advise other Federal
and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our intentions and to
obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider
during the planning process. We are also announcing public meetings and
requesting public comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
December 31, 2010. We will hold public meetings to begin the CCP
planning process; see Public Meetings under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for dates, times, and locations.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: oregoncoastCCP@fws.gov. Include ``Bandon Marsh, Nestucca
Bay, and Siletz Bay CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Project Leader, 541-867-4551.
U.S. Mail: Oregon Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2127 SE.
Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments during regular
business hours at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy W. Lowe, Project Leader, Oregon
Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2127 SE. Marine Science Drive,
Newport, OR 97365; phone (541) 867-4550, and fax (541) 867-4551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate our process for developing a CCP for
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges in
Coos, Tillamook, and Lincoln Counties, Oregon. This notice complies
with our CCP policy to (1) advise other Federal and State agencies,
Tribes, and the public of our intention to conduct detailed planning on
these refuges, and (2) obtain suggestions and information on the scope
of issues to consider in the environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in
accordance with the Refuge Administration Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System was established
for specific purposes. These purposes are the foundation for developing
and prioritizing the conservation and management goals and objectives
for each refuge within the National Wildlife Refuge System, and
determining compatible public uses for each refuge. The planning
process is a way for us and the public to evaluate management goals and
objectives for refuge wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while
providing for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are
compatible with the refuge's establishing purposes and the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System.
Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public.
At this time we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns, ideas,
and suggestions for the future management of Bandon Marsh, Nestucca
Bay, and Siletz Bay Refuges.
We will conduct an environmental review of this project and prepare
an EA in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
[[Page 73122]]
4321 et seq.); NEPA regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); other
appropriate Federal laws and regulations; and our policies and
procedures for compliance with those laws and regulations.
Bandon Marsh, Nestucca Bay, and Siletz Bay National Wildlife Refuges
Bandon Marsh NWR was established in 1983, with the acquisition of
289 acres of salt marsh, mudflats, and tidal sloughs. The Bandon Marsh
Unit is located near the mouth of the Coquille River, with
approximately 75 percent of the Unit within the city limits of Bandon,
Oregon. The 582-acre Ni-les'tun Unit, established in 2000, includes 400
acres of historic salt marsh that is currently being restored to tidal
action. The Ni-les'tun Unit is located on the east side of Highway 101
on the north bank of the Coquille River. The total land base of Bandon
Marsh NWR is 889 acres.
The purpose for establishing Bandon Marsh NWR was ``for the
preservation and enhancement of the highly significant wildlife habitat
of the area known as Bandon Marsh, in the estuary of the Coquille River
* * * for the protection of migratory waterfowl, numerous species of
shorebirds, and fish, including Chinook and silver salmon, and to
provide opportunity for wildlife-oriented recreation and nature study
on the marsh * * *'' (95 Stat. 1709, dated Dec 29, 1981). The Ni-
les'tun Unit was added to Bandon Marsh NWR in order to (1) protect and
restore intertidal marsh, freshwater marsh, and riparian areas to
provide a diversity of habitats for migratory birds, including
waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and songbirds; (2) restore
intertidal marsh habitat for anadromous fish such as the threatened
coho salmon, chinook, chum salmon, steelhead, and cutthroat trout; (3)
protect and restore habitat for species listed under the Endangered
Species Act as threatened or endangered; and (4) provide wildlife-
dependent public use opportunities compatible with refuge purposes.
Nestucca Bay NWR is located near Pacific City and Neskowin in
Tillamook County, Oregon. The refuge was established in 1991 with the
acquisition of a 384-acre dairy farm, and has since expanded to 818.5
acres. The primary need for establishing Nestucca Bay NWR was to
protect high-quality coastal habitats for dusky Canada geese and
threatened Aleutian Canada geese (delisted in 2001); other endangered
and threatened species; and a variety of other migratory waterfowl,
shorebirds, raptors, songbirds, anadromous fish, and other wildlife
while preserving part of Oregon's biodiversity. In 2002, the refuge was
expanded to include the Neskowin Marsh Unit (222.6 acres acquired),
located about 2.5 miles south of the Nestucca Bay Refuge Unit near the
community of Neskowin, Oregon. Neskowin Marsh incorporates unique
freshwater wetland and bog habitats and wildlife resources not found
within the initial refuge boundary.
Siletz Bay NWR is located near Lincoln City on the central coast of
Oregon. The refuge was established in 1991 with a donation of 46 acres
of tidally muted salt marsh. The approved acquisition refuge boundary
totals 1,936 acres and encompasses the northern tip of the Siletz spit,
vegetated and unvegetated tidelands of the bay, and a portion of the
diked former tidelands of the Siletz River floodplain. Approximately
1,060 acres within the authorized boundary are State-owned tidelands.
Currently, refuge lands total 568 acres. The primary need for
establishing this refuge was to protect coastal wetland habitats and
upland buffers for a variety of waterfowl, shorebirds, marine mammals,
endangered species, raptors, songbirds, fish, and other wildlife. The
refuge serves to protect the remaining coastal wetlands and uplands
adjacent to Siletz Bay from rapidly encroaching development, and
management emphasis has been to enhance and restore wetland and upland
habitats for a variety of estuarine-dependent fish and wildlife
species.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities
that we may address in the CCP. We have briefly summarized these issues
below. During public scoping, we may identify additional issues.
Bandon Marsh NWR Preliminary Issues: What actions should the
Service take to sustain and restore priority species and habitats on
this refuge over the next 15 years? Based upon the refuge's priority
fish and wildlife species, which habitats would be monitored and
managed to control invasive species? What management options should the
refuge consider for restoration of the degraded upland forest and
grassland? What possibilities exist for enhancing existing or adding
additional wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities, including
wildlife observation trails and/or photography points? Which areas/
habitats of the refuge should be managed as undisturbed wildlife
sanctuary areas (closed to the public) and which areas should be open
to public use? Should the refuge consider changes to the Bandon Marsh
NWR waterfowl hunting program? Would allowing hunting and other
wildlife-dependent recreational uses in new areas (e.g., Ni-les'tun
Unit) have detrimental effects on the refuge's ability to provide
adequate undisturbed quality wintering habitat for waterfowl and other
wildlife? Is there enough use of the refuge by migrating waterfowl to
provide a quality hunting program?
Nestucca Bay NWR Preliminary Issues: What actions should the
Service take to sustain and restore priority species and habitats on
this refuge over the next 15 years? Based upon the refuge's priority
fish and wildlife species, which are the priority habitats to monitor
for invasive species, and what is the range of Integrated Pest
Management strategies that should be considered to reduce the incidence
and spread of invasive species? Should the Service consider restoring
some pastures at Nestucca Bay NWR to tidal marsh, and what effect would
this have on the refuge's ability to provide wintering habitat for
geese and reduce goose depredation on neighboring private lands? Should
the Cannery Hill Unit at Nestucca Bay NWR be managed specifically to
restore former coastal prairie, and if so, how much emphasis should be
placed on specific needs of the threatened Oregon silverspot butterfly
within a larger coastal prairie restoration plan? What options should
be considered for the old roadbed through Neskowin Marsh (tsunami
escape route) if it is found to be impacting water flows through
Neskowin Marsh? Should the Service consider designating Neskowin Marsh
as a Research Natural Area? What possibilities exist for adding or
enhancing existing wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities on
Nestucca Bay NWR? Are existing refuge access points and uses adequate
and do they provide a quality experience? Should the refuge consider
establishing waterfowl hunting programs at Nestucca Bay NWR? Can the
level of migrating waterfowl use on Nestucca Bay NWR support a quality
hunting program?
Siletz Bay NWR Preliminary Issues: What actions should the Service
take to sustain and restore priority species and habitats on this
refuge over the next 15 years? Based upon the refuge's priority fish
and wildlife species, which habitats are most important to monitor for
invasive species? What partnering possibilities exist for treatment of
aquatic invasive species such as smooth cordgrass and New Zealand mud
snail? Can wetlands currently hampered by fish passage barriers and
other issues be restored, and if so, how should the
[[Page 73123]]
Service prioritize them? What opportunities exist for adding or
enhancing existing wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities and
access points? Which areas of the refuge should be managed as
undisturbed sanctuary areas and which areas should be considered for
public access? Should the refuge consider establishing a waterfowl
hunting program at Siletz Bay NWR? Would waterfowl hunting and other
wildlife-dependent recreational activities have detrimental effects on
the refuge's ability to provide adequate undisturbed quality wintering
habitat for waterfowl? Is there enough use of the refuge by migrating
waterfowl to support a quality hunting program? Should the refuge
consider enhancing the currently offered seasonal opportunities to
observe wildlife via guided canoe/kayak excursion through the refuge?
Public Meetings
We will hold the following public meetings. For more information,
contact the person under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 29, 2010....................... 6-9 p.m.................. Lincoln City Community Center, 2150 NE. Oar Place, Lincoln City, OR 97367.
November 30, 2010....................... 6-9 p.m.................. Kiawanda Community Center, 34600 Cape Kiawanda Drive, Pacific City, OR 97135.
December 2, 2010........................ 6-9 p.m.................. Bandon Community Center, 1200 11th Street SW., Bandon, OR 97411.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010-30063 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P