Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Ohio Portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton Area; 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan, 72954-72956 [2010-29784]
Download as PDF
72954
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0979 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0979 Safety Zone; 1000 yard
radius from position 29≥48.77′ N 091≥33.02′
W, Charenton Drainage and Navigation
Canal, St. Mary Parish, LA.
(a) Enforcement Areas. The safety
zone exists in an area comprising a 1000
yard radius from position 29°48.77′ N
091°33.02′ W, Charenton Drainage and
Navigation Canal.
(b) Effective date. This rule is effective
on October 20, 2010 through December
31, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.33 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Morgan City.
(2) Vessels requiring entry into or
passage through the Safety Zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Morgan City, or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or by
telephone at (985) 380–5320.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Morgan City and
designated on-scene patrol personnel.
On-scene patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
Blake E. Welborn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Morgan City, Louisiana.
[FR Doc. 2010–29878 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0656; FRL–9232–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Ohio Portion of the CincinnatiHamilton Area; 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Plan
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency.
Direct final rule.
ACTION:
EPA is approving a revision to
the maintenance plan for the Ohio
portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton,
OH–KY–IN 8-hour ozone area. The
Cincinnati-Hamilton area includes
Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:15 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
and Warren Counties in Ohio,
Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn
County, Indiana, and Boone, Campbell,
and Kenton Counties in Kentucky. The
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
(Ohio EPA) submitted a maintenance
plan revision on July 6, 2010. The
submittal contained revisions to 2015
and 2020 NOX point source emissions
projections for Butler County to reflect
modifications at a major source that will
occur during the maintenance period.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective January 28, 2011, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by
December 29, 2010. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0656, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2551.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney,
Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010–
0656. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This Facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Kathleen D’Agostino,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886–
1767 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What revisions are being made to the
maintenance plan?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
I. What is the background for this
action?
On May 11, 2010 (75 FR 26118), EPA
redesignated the Ohio and Indiana
portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area
to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). At that time, EPA also
approved, as a revision to the Ohio and
Indiana State Implementation Plans
(SIP), the States’ plans for maintaining
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS through 2020
in the area.
The Ohio and Indiana plans
demonstrated maintenance of the 8-hour
ozone standard through 2020 by
showing that current and future
emissions of VOC and NOX for the
Cincinnati-Hamilton area remain at or
below attainment year emission levels.
The Cincinnati-Hamilton area attained
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS during the
2007–2009 time period. For attainment
emission levels, Ohio and Indiana used
2008 inventories. Emissions inventory
projections for the years 2015 and 2020
were used to demonstrate maintenance.
As part of their maintenance plans,
the States elected to include a ‘‘safety
margin’’ for the area. A ‘‘safety margin’’
is the difference between the attainment
level of emissions (from all sources) and
the projected level of emissions (from
all sources) in the maintenance plan
which continues to demonstrate
attainment of the standard. For the Ohio
and Indiana portion of the CincinnatiHamilton area, the emissions from
point, area, nonroad, and mobile
sources in 2008 equaled 144.22 tons per
day (tpd) and 230.28 tpd of VOC and
NOX, respectively. In the maintenance
plans, Ohio and Indiana projected VOC
and NOX emission levels for 2020 to be
117.70 tpd and 197.75 tpd, respectively.
The SIP submissions demonstrated that
the Cincinnati-Hamilton area will
continue to maintain the standard with
emissions at this level. The safety
margin was calculated to be the
difference between 2008 and 2020
emissions levels. The 2020 safety
margin for VOC was 26.52 tpd (i.e.,
144.22 tpd less 117.70). For NOX, the
2020 safety margin was 32.53 tpd. Using
the same method of calculation, the
2015 safety margins for VOC and NOX
were 23.40 tpd and 17.50 tpd,
respectively. The safety margin, or a
portion thereof, can be allocated to any
of the source categories, as long as the
total attainment level of emissions is
maintained.
At the time the maintenance plan was
approved, EPA also approved VOC and
72955
NOX Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
(MVEBs) for 2015 and 2020 for the Ohio
and Indiana portions of the CincinnatiHamilton area. The MVEBs requested by
Ohio EPA and the Indiana Department
of Environmental Management (IDEM)
contained safety margins for mobile
sources smaller than the allowable
safety margins reflected in the total
emissions for the Ohio and Indiana
portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton
area. For VOC, mobile safety margins of
4.14 tpd and 3.76 tpd were included for
2015 and 2020, respectively. For NOX,
mobile safety margins of 6.39 tpd and
4.49 tpd were included for 2015 and
2020, respectively.
II. What revisions are being made to the
maintenance plan?
Ohio submitted revisions to 2015 and
2020 NOX point source emissions
projections for Butler County to reflect
modifications at a major source which
will occur during the maintenance
period. These revised projections show
an increase of 1.31 tons per day (tpd) of
NOX in both 2015 and 2020. As shown
in Table 1, for the Ohio and Indiana
portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton
area, 2015 and 2020 emissions remain
below attainment levels.
TABLE 1—COMPARISON OF 2008, 2015 AND 2020 VOC AND NOX EMISSIONS FOR THE OHIO AND INDIANA PORTION OF
THE CINCINNATI-HAMILTON AREA (TPD)
VOC
2008
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Point .........................
Area ..........................
Onroad .....................
Nonroad ....................
Total ..................
2015
2020
10.65
57.73
30.51
45.33
144.22
12.85
54.33
27.59
26.05
120.82
Net
change
(2008–
2015)
13.53
54.33
25.06
24.78
117.70
For the Ohio and Indiana portion of
the Cincinnati-Hamilton area, the NOX
emissions from point, area, nonroad,
and mobile sources in 2008 equaled
230.28 tpd. For 2015, projected NOX
emission levels equal 214.09 tpd. The
safety margin for NOX is calculated to be
the difference between these amounts
or, in this case, 16.19 tpd for 2015. For
2020, the NOX safety margin is 31.22
tpd. The portion of the NOX safety
margins allocated to the onroad mobile
source sector when the MVEBs were
approved remains smaller than the
revised allowable safety margins
reflected in the total emissions for the
Ohio and Indiana portion of the
Cincinnati-Hamilton area. Because no
changes were made to the VOC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
NOX
16:19 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
2.20
¥3.40
¥2.92
¥19.28
¥23.40
Net
change
(2008–
2020)
2008
2020
88.97
10.98
91.67
38.66
230.28
2.88
¥3.40
¥5.45
¥20.55
¥26.52
2015
135.21
11.03
42.61
25.24
214.09
138.43
11.03
29.90
19.70
199.06
inventories, the safety margins remain
unchanged.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving a revision to the
maintenance plan for the Ohio portion
of the Cincinnati-Hamilton 8-hour
ozone area. Changes were made to the
2015 and 2020 NOX point source
emissions projections for Butler County
to reflect modifications at a major
source that will occur during the
maintenance period.
We are publishing this action without
prior proposal because we view this as
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Net
change
(2008–
2015)
46.24
0.05
¥49.06
¥13.42
¥16.19
Net
change
(2008–
2020)
49.46
0.05
¥61.77
¥18.96
¥31.22
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
State plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective January 28, 2011 without
further notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by December
29, 2010. If we receive such comments,
we will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA
will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
72956
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with RULES
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. If we do not receive
any comments, this action will be
effective January 28, 2011.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:15 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 28, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: November 15, 2010.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart KK—Ohio
2. Section 52.1885 is amended by
adding paragraph (ff)(11) to read as
follows:
§ 52.1885
Control strategy: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
*
(ff) * * *
(11) Approval—On July 6, 2010, the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
submitted a request to revise the
maintenance plan for the Ohio portion
of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH–KY–IN
8-hour ozone area. The submittal revises
2015 and 2020 NOX point source
emissions projections for Butler County.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–29784 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0515; FRL–9232–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Clean Air Interstate Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a request submitted by
the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) on
June 29, 2009, to revise the Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP) under
the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State has
submitted amendments to the Indiana
Administrative Code (IAC), which
supplement Indiana’s Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR), for which EPA
granted limited approval as an
abbreviated SIP on October 22, 2007.
The abbreviated SIP was to be
implemented in conjunction with a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) that
specified requirements for emissions
monitoring, permit provisions, and
other elements of CAIR programs. The
State’s June 29, 2009, submittal includes
elements that EPA deems necessary in
order for EPA to fully approve Indiana’s
CAIR SIP. This will allow a transition
from an abbreviated SIP with limited
approval to a full SIP with full approval
under which the various CAIR
implementation provisions would be
governed by State rules rather than FIP
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72954-72956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29784]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0656; FRL-9232-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Ohio Portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton Area; 8-Hour Ozone
Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to the maintenance plan for the
Ohio portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN 8-hour ozone area.
The Cincinnati-Hamilton area includes Butler, Clermont, Clinton,
Hamilton, and Warren Counties in Ohio, Lawrenceburg Township in
Dearborn County, Indiana, and Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties in
Kentucky. The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) submitted
a maintenance plan revision on July 6, 2010. The submittal contained
revisions to 2015 and 2020 NOX point source emissions
projections for Butler County to reflect modifications at a major
source that will occur during the maintenance period.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective January 28, 2011,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by December 29, 2010. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0656, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2551.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0656. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Kathleen D'Agostino,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886-1767 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What revisions are being made to the maintenance plan?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[[Page 72955]]
I. What is the background for this action?
On May 11, 2010 (75 FR 26118), EPA redesignated the Ohio and
Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area to attainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). At
that time, EPA also approved, as a revision to the Ohio and Indiana
State Implementation Plans (SIP), the States' plans for maintaining the
8-hour ozone NAAQS through 2020 in the area.
The Ohio and Indiana plans demonstrated maintenance of the 8-hour
ozone standard through 2020 by showing that current and future
emissions of VOC and NOX for the Cincinnati-Hamilton area
remain at or below attainment year emission levels. The Cincinnati-
Hamilton area attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS during the 2007-2009 time
period. For attainment emission levels, Ohio and Indiana used 2008
inventories. Emissions inventory projections for the years 2015 and
2020 were used to demonstrate maintenance.
As part of their maintenance plans, the States elected to include a
``safety margin'' for the area. A ``safety margin'' is the difference
between the attainment level of emissions (from all sources) and the
projected level of emissions (from all sources) in the maintenance plan
which continues to demonstrate attainment of the standard. For the Ohio
and Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area, the emissions from
point, area, nonroad, and mobile sources in 2008 equaled 144.22 tons
per day (tpd) and 230.28 tpd of VOC and NOX, respectively.
In the maintenance plans, Ohio and Indiana projected VOC and
NOX emission levels for 2020 to be 117.70 tpd and 197.75
tpd, respectively. The SIP submissions demonstrated that the
Cincinnati-Hamilton area will continue to maintain the standard with
emissions at this level. The safety margin was calculated to be the
difference between 2008 and 2020 emissions levels. The 2020 safety
margin for VOC was 26.52 tpd (i.e., 144.22 tpd less 117.70). For
NOX, the 2020 safety margin was 32.53 tpd. Using the same
method of calculation, the 2015 safety margins for VOC and
NOX were 23.40 tpd and 17.50 tpd, respectively. The safety
margin, or a portion thereof, can be allocated to any of the source
categories, as long as the total attainment level of emissions is
maintained.
At the time the maintenance plan was approved, EPA also approved
VOC and NOX Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for 2015
and 2020 for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton
area. The MVEBs requested by Ohio EPA and the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) contained safety margins for mobile
sources smaller than the allowable safety margins reflected in the
total emissions for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-
Hamilton area. For VOC, mobile safety margins of 4.14 tpd and 3.76 tpd
were included for 2015 and 2020, respectively. For NOX,
mobile safety margins of 6.39 tpd and 4.49 tpd were included for 2015
and 2020, respectively.
II. What revisions are being made to the maintenance plan?
Ohio submitted revisions to 2015 and 2020 NOX point
source emissions projections for Butler County to reflect modifications
at a major source which will occur during the maintenance period. These
revised projections show an increase of 1.31 tons per day (tpd) of
NOX in both 2015 and 2020. As shown in Table 1, for the Ohio
and Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area, 2015 and 2020
emissions remain below attainment levels.
Table 1--Comparison of 2008, 2015 and 2020 VOC and NOX Emissions for the Ohio and Indiana Portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton Area (tpd)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC NOX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net change Net change Net change Net change
2008 2015 2020 (2008-2015) (2008-2020) 2008 2015 2020 (2008-2015) (2008-2020)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point............................. 10.65 12.85 13.53 2.20 2.88 88.97 135.21 138.43 46.24 49.46
Area.............................. 57.73 54.33 54.33 -3.40 -3.40 10.98 11.03 11.03 0.05 0.05
Onroad............................ 30.51 27.59 25.06 -2.92 -5.45 91.67 42.61 29.90 -49.06 -61.77
Nonroad........................... 45.33 26.05 24.78 -19.28 -20.55 38.66 25.24 19.70 -13.42 -18.96
Total......................... 144.22 120.82 117.70 -23.40 -26.52 230.28 214.09 199.06 -16.19 -31.22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Ohio and Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area,
the NOX emissions from point, area, nonroad, and mobile
sources in 2008 equaled 230.28 tpd. For 2015, projected NOX
emission levels equal 214.09 tpd. The safety margin for NOX
is calculated to be the difference between these amounts or, in this
case, 16.19 tpd for 2015. For 2020, the NOX safety margin is
31.22 tpd. The portion of the NOX safety margins allocated
to the onroad mobile source sector when the MVEBs were approved remains
smaller than the revised allowable safety margins reflected in the
total emissions for the Ohio and Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-
Hamilton area. Because no changes were made to the VOC inventories, the
safety margins remain unchanged.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving a revision to the maintenance plan for the Ohio
portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton 8-hour ozone area. Changes were made
to the 2015 and 2020 NOX point source emissions projections
for Butler County to reflect modifications at a major source that will
occur during the maintenance period.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the State plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective January 28,
2011 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by December 29, 2010. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA
[[Page 72956]]
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not receive any comments,
this action will be effective January 28, 2011.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 28, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 15, 2010.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart KK--Ohio
2. Section 52.1885 is amended by adding paragraph (ff)(11) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1885 Control strategy: Ozone.
* * * * *
(ff) * * *
(11) Approval--On July 6, 2010, the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency submitted a request to revise the maintenance plan for the Ohio
portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN 8-hour ozone area. The
submittal revises 2015 and 2020 NOX point source emissions
projections for Butler County.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-29784 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P