Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 72839-72840 [2010-29716]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices importation of certain gaming and entertainment consoles, related software, and components thereof. The complaint names as respondent Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, WA. The complainant, proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed five pages in length, on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. Comments should address whether issuance of an exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation would negatively affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used in the United States; (ii) Identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the potential orders; (iii) Indicate the extent to which like or directly competitive articles are produced in the United States or are otherwise available in the United States, with respect to the articles potentially subject to the orders; and (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, Complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to an exclusion order and a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business, five business days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2770’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. The Commission’s rules authorize filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means only to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ documents/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Nov 24, 2010 Jkt 223001 electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50(a)(4)). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 22, 2010. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–29736 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–10–032] Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE: December 3, 2010 at 11 a.m. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS: Open to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agendas for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–476 and 731–TA–1179 (Preliminary). (Multilayered Wood Flooring from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 6, 2010; Commissioners’ opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 13, 2010. 5. Vote in Inv. No. 731–TA–282 (Third Review)(Petroleum Wax Candles from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners’ AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 72839 opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 16, 2010. 6. Outstanding action jackets: None. In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 22, 2010. William R. Bishop, Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. [FR Doc. 2010–29875 Filed 11–23–10; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Notice is hereby given that on November 19, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree in The United States of America, the Coeur d’Alene Tribe, and the State of Idaho v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Civ. No. 10–578–EJL, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Plaintiffs the United States, the Tribe and the State filed a complaint concurrently with the Consent Decree alleging that Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company is liable pursuant to Section 107(a)(2) of CERCLA for response costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States and the State and for natural resources damages in connection with releases of hazardous substances at or from Operable Unit 3 of the Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site (Bunker Hill Site) in northern Idaho. The Complaint alleges Defendant, and its predecessor The Anaconda Company, owned and/or operated mining or milling related facilities within Operable Unit 3. The proposed Consent Decree grants the Defendant a covenant not to sue for response costs, as well as natural resource damages, in connection with the Bunker Hill Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency incurred response costs, and the United States Department of the Interior, the United States Department of Agriculture, the Tribe and the State are trustees of injured natural resources. The settlement requires the Defendant to pay a total of $6.75 million ($5,062,500 will be paid to EPA for response costs and $1,687,500 will be paid to the natural resource trustees for natural resources damages). E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM 26NON1 72840 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices For thirty (30) days after the date of this publication, the Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611. In either case, the comments should refer to U.S., et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Company., Civ No. 10–578–EJL and D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3– 128/9. During the comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address. Maureen Katz, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2010–29716 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121–0283] Agency Information Collection Activities: Reinstatement, With Change of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired, Comments Requested 30-day notice of information Collection under review: State Court Organization 2009. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: The Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Nov 24, 2010 Jkt 223001 affected agencies. The proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186, pages 59293– 59294, on September 27, 2010, allowing for a 60-day public comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment until December 27, 2010. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Written comments and suggestions from the pubic and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information (1) Type of information collection: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which OMB approval has expired, State Court Organization, 2009. (2) The title of the form/collection: State Court Organization, 2009 or SCO 2009. (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: The form label is SCO–2009, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (4) Affected Public Who Will be Asked or Required to Respond, as well as a Brief Abstract: State trial and appellate courts and state administrative court offices. Abstract: State Court Organization 2009 will focus on the organizational structure of state courts throughout the country. Emphasis will be placed on collecting information pertaining to the number of trial and appellate court judges, the selection of judicial officers, the governance of the judicial branch, the funding and budgets of state courts, appellate and trial court staffing, the use of juries, and sentencing procedures. Moreover, information will be collected on the utilization of information technology systems in state courts. All data collected will be accurate as of December 2009. (5) An Estimate of the Total Number of Respondents and the Amount of Time Estimated for an Average Respondent to Respond: The State Court Organization (SCO) data collection forms will be sent to each of the nation’s 56 court systems (those for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S territories including American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands). The data collection instruments will be in the form of spreadsheets that will basically mirror the electronic and PDF tables produced for the SCO report. There are a total of 62 spreadsheets that the respondents will be asked to complete for their individual states or courts. Consistent with past data collections, recurring tables will be populated with data previously reported in prior SCO publications. Previous SCO surveys, along with pretests of the current data collection spreadsheet, have shown that it should take an estimated half an hour for the 56 court systems to review and revise each pre-populated spreadsheet. Since 38 of the 62 spreadsheets hail from prior SCO surveys, the total burden hours to review, revise, and update the pre-populated SCO spreadsheets for each of the court systems should be about 19 hours (38 spreadsheets * half an hour per spreadsheet = 19 hours per state or U.S. territory). For new spreadsheets, no historical data will be available, and the data collection forms will be blank. Pretests have shown that it should take an hour to provide the requested information for each data collection spreadsheet. Since 24 of the 62 spreadsheets involve the collection of new SCO data, the total burden hours to collect the requested data for each court systems should be about 24 hours (24 spreadsheets * one hour per spreadsheet E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM 26NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72839-72840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)

    Notice is hereby given that on November 19, 2010, a proposed 
Consent Decree in The United States of America, the Coeur d'Alene 
Tribe, and the State of Idaho v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Civ. No. 
10-578-EJL, was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Idaho.
    Plaintiffs the United States, the Tribe and the State filed a 
complaint concurrently with the Consent Decree alleging that Defendant 
Atlantic Richfield Company is liable pursuant to Section 107(a)(2) of 
CERCLA for response costs incurred and to be incurred by the United 
States and the State and for natural resources damages in connection 
with releases of hazardous substances at or from Operable Unit 3 of the 
Bunker Hill Mining and Metallurgical Complex Superfund Site (Bunker 
Hill Site) in northern Idaho. The Complaint alleges Defendant, and its 
predecessor The Anaconda Company, owned and/or operated mining or 
milling related facilities within Operable Unit 3. The proposed Consent 
Decree grants the Defendant a covenant not to sue for response costs, 
as well as natural resource damages, in connection with the Bunker Hill 
Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency incurred 
response costs, and the United States Department of the Interior, the 
United States Department of Agriculture, the Tribe and the State are 
trustees of injured natural resources. The settlement requires the 
Defendant to pay a total of $6.75 million ($5,062,500 will be paid to 
EPA for response costs and $1,687,500 will be paid to the natural 
resource trustees for natural resources damages).

[[Page 72840]]

    For thirty (30) days after the date of this publication, the 
Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to 
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In either case, the 
comments should refer to U.S., et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Company., 
Civ No. 10-578-EJL and D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-128/9.
    During the comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined on 
the following Department of Justice Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, or by faxing or e-
mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax 
no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In 
requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a 
check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) 
payable to the United States Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward 
a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated 
address.

Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-29716 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.