Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Missile Launch Operations From San Nicolas Island, CA, 71672-71674 [2010-29656]
Download as PDF
71672
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices
above. Seating is available to the public
on a first-come, first-served basis.
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should also be directed to
the Designated Federal Official as soon
as known, and preferably two weeks
prior to the meeting.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
Robert M. Groves,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 2010–29602 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–911]
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe From the People’s Republic of
China: Rescission of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: November 24,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Morris at (202) 482–1779; AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On July 1, 2010, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published
a notice announcing the opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
countervailing duty order on circular
welded carbon quality steel pipe
(‘‘CWP’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’). See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 75
FR 38074 (July 1, 2010). On July 31,
2010, the Ad Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe
Imports and its individual members,
Allied Tube & Conduit, IPSCO Tubulars,
Inc., Sharon Tube Company, Western
Tube & Conduit Corporation, and
Wheatland Tube Company (collectively
‘‘Petitioners’’), who are domestic
producers of CWP, timely requested that
the Department conduct an
administrative review of fourteen
producers and/or exporters of the
subject merchandise covering the period
of January 1, 2009, through December
31, 2009. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department
published a notice initiating this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
administrative review. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Deferral of
Initiation of Administrative Review, 75
FR 53274, 53276 (August 31, 2010).
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if the party
that requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. On October 27,
2010, Petitioners withdrew their request
for review of all fourteen exporters and
producers within the 90-day period.
Therefore, in response to Petitioners’
timely withdrawal request, and as no
other party requested a review, the
Department is rescinding this
administrative review.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded, the
countervailing duties shall be assessed
at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated countervailing duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice of
rescission of administrative review.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice of rescission is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act,
as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: November 17, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–29668 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XY60
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Missile Launch
Operations From San Nicolas Island,
CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of a revised
Letter of Authorization.
AGENCY:
In June, 2009, pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS issued regulations to
govern the unintentional taking of
marine mammals incidental to U.S.
Navy (Navy) missile launch operations,
a military readiness activity, from San
Nicolas Island (SNI), California, for the
period of June 2009 through June 2014.
The second Letter of Authorization
(LOA) for the incidental take of marine
mammals during the described activities
and specified timeframes is effective
from June 4, 2010, through June 3, 2011.
Following issuance of the LOA, the
Navy submitted a revised monitoring
plan for their activities at SNI. NMFS
has issued a revised LOA, which
incorporates the revised monitoring
plan, to replace the one that was
previously in effect.
DATES: Effective December 1, 2010,
through November 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The LOA and supporting
documentation are available for review
by writing to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation, and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910 or by telephoning one of the
contacts listed below (FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Documents cited
in this notice may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address
and at the Southwest Regional Office,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Boulevard,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Magliocca, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 301–713–2289, or
Monica DeAngelis, NMFS, 562–980–
3232.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs the Secretary
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices
of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and
regulations are issued. However, for
military readiness activities, the
National Defense Authorization Act
(Pub. L. 108–136) removed the ‘‘small
numbers’’ and ‘‘specified geographical
region’’ limitations. Under the MMPA,
the term ‘‘take’’ means to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill, or to attempt to harass,
hunt, capture, or kill marine mammals.
Authorization may be granted for
periods up to 5 years if NMFS finds,
after notification and opportunity for
public comment, that the taking will
have a negligible impact on the species
or stock(s) of marine mammals and will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses. In
addition, NMFS must prescribe
regulations that include permissible
methods of taking and other means of
effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on the species and its habitat
and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance. The
regulations must include requirements
for monitoring and reporting of such
taking.
Regulations governing the taking of
Northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris), Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardsi), and
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus), by harassment,
incidental to missile launch operations
at SNI, were issued on June 2, 2009, and
remain in effect until June 2, 2014 (74
FR 26580). The previous 2010 LOA
under these regulations was issued on
June 4, 2010 (75 FR 28587). For more
detailed information on this action,
please refer to these documents. The
regulations and LOA include mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
for the incidental take of marine
mammals during missile launches at
SNI. Northern elephant seals, Pacific
harbor seals, and California sea lions are
found on various haul-out sites and
rookeries on SNI. The LOA authorizes
take of the three pinniped species listed
above that may result from the
launching of up to 40 missiles from SNI
per year. Up to 10 launches per year
may occur at night. Nighttime launches
will only occur when required by the
test objectives, e.g., when testing the
Airborne Laser system. The noise
generated by Navy activities may result
in the incidental harassment of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
71673
pinnipeds, both behaviorally and in
terms of physiological (auditory)
impacts. The noise and visual
disturbances from missile launches may
cause the animals to move towards or
enter the water. The LOA authorizes the
following numbers of pinnipeds to be
incidentally taken by Level B
harassment annually: 474 Northern
elephant seals; 467 Pacific harbor seals;
and 1,606 California sea lions.
simultaneous audio recording separate
from the acoustic monitoring data,
collected as described in the regulations
(74 FR 26580) and previous 2010 LOA
(75 FR 28587), will be available. Navy
biologists will make direct visual
observations of the pinniped groups,
prior to deployment of the thermal
imaging cameras, in order to record
weather conditions, species, locations of
any pinnipeds hauled out, etc.
Summary of the Modification
On June 7, 2010, NMFS received a
proposed revised monitoring plan for
vehicle launches at SNI, California, in
association with an LOA issued on June
4, 2010 and in effect through June 3,
2011. The revised monitoring plan was
updated to reflect new equipment and
procedures proposed by the Navy, along
with a proposal to discontinue targeted
monitoring of Northern elephant seals.
After reviewing the revised monitoring
plan, the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission) further recommended
that the Navy obtain, analyze, and
review existing information regarding
potential displacement of Northern
elephant seals, Pacific harbor seals, and
California sea lions from those rookeries
and haul out sites affected by launch
activities. NMFS marine mammal
surveys from SNI have since been
reviewed for any indications of
decreasing trends in pinniped
abundance or changes in distribution
since the take of marine mammals
incidental to launches from SNI were
authorized beginning in August 2001.
The surveys do not indicate any
significant changes in abundance or
distribution. The following are the only
modifications to the previous 2010
LOA; all other mitigation and
monitoring requirements remain
unchanged.
Monitoring of Northern Elephant Seals
The Navy will eliminate targeted
monitoring of Northern elephant seals
during all future launches of Vandaland Coyote-size, and smaller, vehicles
on SNI. During the majority of launches
monitored over the past 9 years,
Northern elephant seals exhibited little
reaction to vehicle launches. The Navy’s
most recent monitoring report estimated
that zero Northern elephant seals were
harassed by launches from SNI. During
future launches, Northern elephant seals
would only be monitored if they happen
to be alongside other monitored
pinniped species (i.e., Pacific harbor
seals and California sea lions) and in the
camera’s field of view. Monitoring sites
will be chosen based primarily on the
presence of Pacific harbor seals and
California sea lions; however, the same
number of sites will continue to be
monitored. By eliminating targeted
monitoring of Northern elephant seals,
the Navy will focus on these more
responsive pinniped species and
remaining questions about the
frequency and extent of these responses.
All other aspects of the Navy’s
monitoring requirements, as stated in
the regulations (74 FR 26580) and
previous 2010 LOA (75 FR 28587), will
remain the same. The Navy will submit
a single annual report for the period
June 2010 through November 2011.
Nighttime Launches
The Navy recently acquired forward
looking infrared (FLIR) HS–324
Command thermal imaging cameras for
nighttime monitoring of pinnipeds
before, during, and after each missile
launch. Previously, no cameras were
available for nighttime monitoring of
pinniped haul out sites. The thermal
imaging cameras, made by FLIR
Systems, Inc., will be located to
overlook haul out sites up to 6 hours
prior to a launch, depending on safety
restrictions. Placement of the cameras
will cause minimal disturbance to
pinnipeds and will focus on a subgroup
of pinnipeds within the haul out
aggregation. The cameras record data
internally and are capable of storing
more than 5 hours of video; however,
they do not record sound, so no
Summary of Activity and Monitoring
Conducted During 2010
The Navy submitted a preliminary,
qualitative review of marine mammal
monitoring activities between June 4,
2010, and September 1, 2010, as part of
their proposal for a revised monitoring
plan. The review briefly describes two
single launches from SNI on two
different days. These launches occurred
during daylight hours. A single Coyote
missile was launched on each of two
days, June 9 and July 8, 2010, from the
Alpha Launch Complex located 190 m
(623 ft) above sea level on the westcentral part of SNI. For each launch,
three remote video cameras and three or
four audio recorders were deployed at
varying distances from the launch site.
Trained staff also collected general
information on environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
71674
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices
conditions and the status and behavior
of focal animal groups prior to and
following each launch. Behavioral
responses were similar to those
observed during previously monitored
launches. The authorized level of take
was not exceeded, and no evidence of
injury or mortality was observed during
or immediately succeeding the launches
for the monitored pinniped species.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Comments and Responses
A request for public comment on the
revised monitoring plan and proposed
authorization was published on
September 24, 2010 (75 FR 58365), at
the recommendation of the Commission.
During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS received comments from
the Commission and one private citizen.
The comment from the private citizen
opposed the issuance of an
authorization without any specific
substantiation for why such an
authorization should not be issued. For
the reasons set forth in this notice and
the associated rulemaking (74 FR 26580,
June 2, 2009), NMFS believes issuance
of an authorization is appropriate.
Following are the comments from the
Commission and NMFS’ responses:
Comment 1: The Commission
recommends that NMFS initiate such a
rulemaking or provide adequate
justification to support a determination
that rulemaking is not required to
amend section 216.155 of the
regulations to authorize the Navy to
discontinue monitoring the potential
effects of launches on Northern elephant
seals.
Response: NMFS has determined that
a rulemaking is not required to amend
section 216.155 of the regulations to
authorize the Navy to discontinue
monitoring the potential effects of
launches on Northern elephant seals.
Part (b) of this section states that ‘‘The
National Marine Fisheries Service must
be informed immediately of any changes
or deletions to any portions of the
proposed monitoring plan submitted, in
accordance with the Letter of
Authorization.’’ The Navy made NMFS
aware of such changes. Furthermore, the
regulatory text does not require
monitoring of all species present at SNI.
The visual land-based and acoustic
monitoring requirements in 50 CFR
216.155 state that three haul-out sites
will be observed using autonomous
digital video cameras and acoustic
equipment; this requirement remains in
effect under the revised LOA. Visual
land-based monitoring will actually be
enhanced under this LOA through the
use of FLIR thermal imaging cameras
during nighttime launches.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:30 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends that NMFS clarify the
intent of 50 CFR 216.158(a)(1) of its
regulations and explain why it does not
believe that the Navy should be held to
the commitment that there would be no
substantial modifications to the
monitoring program to be carried out
during the 12 months covered by the
previous 2010 LOA.
Response: NMFS has determined that
the Navy’s modifications to their
monitoring program for launch activities
at SNI are not substantial. The Navy will
continue to report on the same number
of monitoring locations as have been
authorized in previous LOAs. The Navy
will no longer target Northern elephant
seals; however, this species may still be
observed if it overlaps with other
pinnipeds at the designated monitoring
locations. This implementation of
adaptive management will allow the
Navy to focus their monitoring and
research on other more responsive
pinniped species at SNI.
Comment 3: The Commission
recommends that NMFS provide the
Commission and the public with the
information necessary to evaluate the
conclusion that there has been no
displacement of pinnipeds from
rookeries and haul-out sites in the areas
potentially affected by launch activities.
Response: Based on unpublished
NMFS survey data from 2000 to 2005,
there has been an overall 107 percent
increase in Northern elephant seal pups
in locations directly within or adjacent
to the Navy’s anticipated launch
azimuths. The area with the highest
increase of non-pups between 2000 and
2005 also took place in locations
directly within or adjacent to the Navy’s
anticipated launch azimuths. In
contrast, other areas of SNI’s perimeter
show an overall decrease in both
Northern elephant seal pups and nonpups, with the greatest observed change
being a decrease of 1,616 Northern
elephant seals near the southeast region
of the island.
Comment 4: The Commission
recommends that NMFS develop and
implement a monitoring strategy
designed to determine whether there are
gaps in the available information for
assessing possible long-term effects and,
if so, to what extent the cumulative
effects of repeated launch activities
might be displacing pinnipeds.
Response: NMFS has determined that
the Navy’s current monitoring strategy
is sufficient to determine if there are any
long-term effects to pinnipeds from
launch activities at SNI. NMFS
biologists have been monitoring
pinnipeds on SNI since 2000 and will
continue to do so under this LOA.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Authorization
The Navy complied with the
requirements of the previous 2010 LOA
and NMFS has determined that there
was no evidence of pinniped injuries or
fatalities related to the June and July
2010 vehicle launches from SNI. The
Navy’s activities fell within the scope of
the activities analyzed in the 2009 rule,
and the observed take did not exceed
that authorized in the previous 2010
LOA. NMFS has determined that this
action would continue to have a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stocks of marine mammals on SNI,
and there are no subsistence uses of
these three pinniped species in
California waters. Accordingly, NMFS
has issued a revised LOA to the Navy
authorizing the take of three marine
mammal species, by harassment,
incidental to missile launch activities
from SNI. The revised LOA will expire
one year from the date of issuance and
the Navy has agreed to operate under
their annual authorized take numbers
for the extended period of June 2010
through November 2011.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29656 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
Wednesday, December
1, 2010; 10 a.m.–11 a.m.
PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland.
STATUS: Closed to the Public.
TIME AND DATE:
Matter To Be Considered:
Compliance Status Report
The Commission staff will brief the
Commission on the status of compliance
matters.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301)
504–7923.
Dated: November 19, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–29830 Filed 11–22–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71672-71674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29656]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XY60
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Missile Launch Operations From San Nicolas Island, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of a revised Letter of Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In June, 2009, pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS issued regulations to govern the unintentional taking of
marine mammals incidental to U.S. Navy (Navy) missile launch
operations, a military readiness activity, from San Nicolas Island
(SNI), California, for the period of June 2009 through June 2014. The
second Letter of Authorization (LOA) for the incidental take of marine
mammals during the described activities and specified timeframes is
effective from June 4, 2010, through June 3, 2011. Following issuance
of the LOA, the Navy submitted a revised monitoring plan for their
activities at SNI. NMFS has issued a revised LOA, which incorporates
the revised monitoring plan, to replace the one that was previously in
effect.
DATES: Effective December 1, 2010, through November 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The LOA and supporting documentation are available for
review by writing to P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation,
and Education Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910 or
by telephoning one of the contacts listed below (FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business hours, at the aforementioned
address and at the Southwest Regional Office, NMFS, 501 West Ocean
Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Magliocca, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 301-713-2289, or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS,
562-980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs
the Secretary
[[Page 71673]]
of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens
who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and
regulations are issued. However, for military readiness activities, the
National Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 108-136) removed the
``small numbers'' and ``specified geographical region'' limitations.
Under the MMPA, the term ``take'' means to harass, hunt, capture, or
kill, or to attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill marine mammals.
Authorization may be granted for periods up to 5 years if NMFS
finds, after notification and opportunity for public comment, that the
taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) of
marine mammals and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses. In
addition, NMFS must prescribe regulations that include permissible
methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the species and its habitat and on the availability
of the species for subsistence uses, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance. The
regulations must include requirements for monitoring and reporting of
such taking.
Regulations governing the taking of Northern elephant seals
(Mirounga angustirostris), Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina
richardsi), and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), by
harassment, incidental to missile launch operations at SNI, were issued
on June 2, 2009, and remain in effect until June 2, 2014 (74 FR 26580).
The previous 2010 LOA under these regulations was issued on June 4,
2010 (75 FR 28587). For more detailed information on this action,
please refer to these documents. The regulations and LOA include
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements for the incidental
take of marine mammals during missile launches at SNI. Northern
elephant seals, Pacific harbor seals, and California sea lions are
found on various haul-out sites and rookeries on SNI. The LOA
authorizes take of the three pinniped species listed above that may
result from the launching of up to 40 missiles from SNI per year. Up to
10 launches per year may occur at night. Nighttime launches will only
occur when required by the test objectives, e.g., when testing the
Airborne Laser system. The noise generated by Navy activities may
result in the incidental harassment of pinnipeds, both behaviorally and
in terms of physiological (auditory) impacts. The noise and visual
disturbances from missile launches may cause the animals to move
towards or enter the water. The LOA authorizes the following numbers of
pinnipeds to be incidentally taken by Level B harassment annually: 474
Northern elephant seals; 467 Pacific harbor seals; and 1,606 California
sea lions.
Summary of the Modification
On June 7, 2010, NMFS received a proposed revised monitoring plan
for vehicle launches at SNI, California, in association with an LOA
issued on June 4, 2010 and in effect through June 3, 2011. The revised
monitoring plan was updated to reflect new equipment and procedures
proposed by the Navy, along with a proposal to discontinue targeted
monitoring of Northern elephant seals. After reviewing the revised
monitoring plan, the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) further
recommended that the Navy obtain, analyze, and review existing
information regarding potential displacement of Northern elephant
seals, Pacific harbor seals, and California sea lions from those
rookeries and haul out sites affected by launch activities. NMFS marine
mammal surveys from SNI have since been reviewed for any indications of
decreasing trends in pinniped abundance or changes in distribution
since the take of marine mammals incidental to launches from SNI were
authorized beginning in August 2001. The surveys do not indicate any
significant changes in abundance or distribution. The following are the
only modifications to the previous 2010 LOA; all other mitigation and
monitoring requirements remain unchanged.
Nighttime Launches
The Navy recently acquired forward looking infrared (FLIR) HS-324
Command thermal imaging cameras for nighttime monitoring of pinnipeds
before, during, and after each missile launch. Previously, no cameras
were available for nighttime monitoring of pinniped haul out sites. The
thermal imaging cameras, made by FLIR Systems, Inc., will be located to
overlook haul out sites up to 6 hours prior to a launch, depending on
safety restrictions. Placement of the cameras will cause minimal
disturbance to pinnipeds and will focus on a subgroup of pinnipeds
within the haul out aggregation. The cameras record data internally and
are capable of storing more than 5 hours of video; however, they do not
record sound, so no simultaneous audio recording separate from the
acoustic monitoring data, collected as described in the regulations (74
FR 26580) and previous 2010 LOA (75 FR 28587), will be available. Navy
biologists will make direct visual observations of the pinniped groups,
prior to deployment of the thermal imaging cameras, in order to record
weather conditions, species, locations of any pinnipeds hauled out,
etc.
Monitoring of Northern Elephant Seals
The Navy will eliminate targeted monitoring of Northern elephant
seals during all future launches of Vandal- and Coyote-size, and
smaller, vehicles on SNI. During the majority of launches monitored
over the past 9 years, Northern elephant seals exhibited little
reaction to vehicle launches. The Navy's most recent monitoring report
estimated that zero Northern elephant seals were harassed by launches
from SNI. During future launches, Northern elephant seals would only be
monitored if they happen to be alongside other monitored pinniped
species (i.e., Pacific harbor seals and California sea lions) and in
the camera's field of view. Monitoring sites will be chosen based
primarily on the presence of Pacific harbor seals and California sea
lions; however, the same number of sites will continue to be monitored.
By eliminating targeted monitoring of Northern elephant seals, the Navy
will focus on these more responsive pinniped species and remaining
questions about the frequency and extent of these responses. All other
aspects of the Navy's monitoring requirements, as stated in the
regulations (74 FR 26580) and previous 2010 LOA (75 FR 28587), will
remain the same. The Navy will submit a single annual report for the
period June 2010 through November 2011.
Summary of Activity and Monitoring Conducted During 2010
The Navy submitted a preliminary, qualitative review of marine
mammal monitoring activities between June 4, 2010, and September 1,
2010, as part of their proposal for a revised monitoring plan. The
review briefly describes two single launches from SNI on two different
days. These launches occurred during daylight hours. A single Coyote
missile was launched on each of two days, June 9 and July 8, 2010, from
the Alpha Launch Complex located 190 m (623 ft) above sea level on the
west-central part of SNI. For each launch, three remote video cameras
and three or four audio recorders were deployed at varying distances
from the launch site. Trained staff also collected general information
on environmental
[[Page 71674]]
conditions and the status and behavior of focal animal groups prior to
and following each launch. Behavioral responses were similar to those
observed during previously monitored launches. The authorized level of
take was not exceeded, and no evidence of injury or mortality was
observed during or immediately succeeding the launches for the
monitored pinniped species.
Comments and Responses
A request for public comment on the revised monitoring plan and
proposed authorization was published on September 24, 2010 (75 FR
58365), at the recommendation of the Commission. During the 30-day
public comment period, NMFS received comments from the Commission and
one private citizen. The comment from the private citizen opposed the
issuance of an authorization without any specific substantiation for
why such an authorization should not be issued. For the reasons set
forth in this notice and the associated rulemaking (74 FR 26580, June
2, 2009), NMFS believes issuance of an authorization is appropriate.
Following are the comments from the Commission and NMFS' responses:
Comment 1: The Commission recommends that NMFS initiate such a
rulemaking or provide adequate justification to support a determination
that rulemaking is not required to amend section 216.155 of the
regulations to authorize the Navy to discontinue monitoring the
potential effects of launches on Northern elephant seals.
Response: NMFS has determined that a rulemaking is not required to
amend section 216.155 of the regulations to authorize the Navy to
discontinue monitoring the potential effects of launches on Northern
elephant seals. Part (b) of this section states that ``The National
Marine Fisheries Service must be informed immediately of any changes or
deletions to any portions of the proposed monitoring plan submitted, in
accordance with the Letter of Authorization.'' The Navy made NMFS aware
of such changes. Furthermore, the regulatory text does not require
monitoring of all species present at SNI. The visual land-based and
acoustic monitoring requirements in 50 CFR 216.155 state that three
haul-out sites will be observed using autonomous digital video cameras
and acoustic equipment; this requirement remains in effect under the
revised LOA. Visual land-based monitoring will actually be enhanced
under this LOA through the use of FLIR thermal imaging cameras during
nighttime launches.
Comment 2: The Commission recommends that NMFS clarify the intent
of 50 CFR 216.158(a)(1) of its regulations and explain why it does not
believe that the Navy should be held to the commitment that there would
be no substantial modifications to the monitoring program to be carried
out during the 12 months covered by the previous 2010 LOA.
Response: NMFS has determined that the Navy's modifications to
their monitoring program for launch activities at SNI are not
substantial. The Navy will continue to report on the same number of
monitoring locations as have been authorized in previous LOAs. The Navy
will no longer target Northern elephant seals; however, this species
may still be observed if it overlaps with other pinnipeds at the
designated monitoring locations. This implementation of adaptive
management will allow the Navy to focus their monitoring and research
on other more responsive pinniped species at SNI.
Comment 3: The Commission recommends that NMFS provide the
Commission and the public with the information necessary to evaluate
the conclusion that there has been no displacement of pinnipeds from
rookeries and haul-out sites in the areas potentially affected by
launch activities.
Response: Based on unpublished NMFS survey data from 2000 to 2005,
there has been an overall 107 percent increase in Northern elephant
seal pups in locations directly within or adjacent to the Navy's
anticipated launch azimuths. The area with the highest increase of non-
pups between 2000 and 2005 also took place in locations directly within
or adjacent to the Navy's anticipated launch azimuths. In contrast,
other areas of SNI's perimeter show an overall decrease in both
Northern elephant seal pups and non-pups, with the greatest observed
change being a decrease of 1,616 Northern elephant seals near the
southeast region of the island.
Comment 4: The Commission recommends that NMFS develop and
implement a monitoring strategy designed to determine whether there are
gaps in the available information for assessing possible long-term
effects and, if so, to what extent the cumulative effects of repeated
launch activities might be displacing pinnipeds.
Response: NMFS has determined that the Navy's current monitoring
strategy is sufficient to determine if there are any long-term effects
to pinnipeds from launch activities at SNI. NMFS biologists have been
monitoring pinnipeds on SNI since 2000 and will continue to do so under
this LOA.
Authorization
The Navy complied with the requirements of the previous 2010 LOA
and NMFS has determined that there was no evidence of pinniped injuries
or fatalities related to the June and July 2010 vehicle launches from
SNI. The Navy's activities fell within the scope of the activities
analyzed in the 2009 rule, and the observed take did not exceed that
authorized in the previous 2010 LOA. NMFS has determined that this
action would continue to have a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks of marine mammals on SNI, and there are no
subsistence uses of these three pinniped species in California waters.
Accordingly, NMFS has issued a revised LOA to the Navy authorizing the
take of three marine mammal species, by harassment, incidental to
missile launch activities from SNI. The revised LOA will expire one
year from the date of issuance and the Navy has agreed to operate under
their annual authorized take numbers for the extended period of June
2010 through November 2011.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29656 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P