Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee for Changes to Livestock Mandatory Reporting, 71568-71570 [2010-29551]
Download as PDF
71568
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
81.4 would be amended to delete
language that GAO records may be
requested via a link on GAO’s Web site.
GAO will continue to accept requests
for GAO records by e-mail. Paragraph
(m) of section 81.6 would be amended
to correctly identify the entity within
GAO that operates GAO FraudNet.
List of Subjects in 4 CFR Part 81
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records,
Computer technology, Electronic
products, Freedom of information,
Public reading room, Requests for
records.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Government
Accountability Office proposes to
amend 4 CFR part 81 as follows:
PART 81—PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
OFFICE RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 711.
2. Amend § 81.1 by revising the first
sentence of paragraph (a), revising
paragraph (b), and adding paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 81.1
Purpose and scope of part.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(a) This part implements the policy of
the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) with respect to the public
availability of GAO records, except as
set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * *
(b) GAO published testimonies,
reports, decisions, special publications,
or listings of publications are not
included within the scope of this part.
These documents may be obtained from
the GAO Web site, https://www.gao.gov,
or by telephone at 202–512–6000, TDD
202–512–2537, or 1–866–801–7077 (toll
free). These publications may be
downloaded free of charge from the
GAO Web site. Paper copies requested
from GAO are subject to a printing,
shipping, and handling fee.
(c) Requests for all other GAO records
are within the scope of this part and
should be submitted to GAO as directed
in § 81.4(a).
3. Revise § 81.2 to read as follows:
§ 81.2
Administration.
GAO’s Chief Quality Officer
administers this part and may
promulgate such supplemental rules or
regulations as may be necessary.
§ 81.4
[Amended]
4. In § 81.4, remove the second
sentence of paragraph (a).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
5. Amend § 81.6 by revising
paragraphs (g) and (m) to read as
follows:
§ 81.6 Records which may be exempt from
disclosure.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Records compiled for law
enforcement purposes that originate in
another agency, or records provided by
GAO to another agency for law
enforcement purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Unsolicited records containing
information submitted by any person to
GAO in confidence. Records obtained by
the GAO Forensic Audits and Special
Investigations (GAO FraudNet) are an
example of records that could contain
information covered by this exemption.
6. Amend § 81.8 by adding a new
second sentence, and revising the last
sentence as follows:
§ 81.8
Public reading facility.
* * * To determine if a record is part
of the public reading facility collection
and to schedule an appointment to visit
the facility, contact the Library reference
desk at 202–512–2585. The facility is
open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. except Saturdays, Sundays, and
Federal holidays.
Lynn H. Gibson,
Acting General Counsel, U.S. Government
Accountability Office.
[FR Doc. 2010–29353 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 59
[Doc. No. AMS–LS–10–0080]
Establishment of Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee for Changes to
Livestock Mandatory Reporting
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Establishment of Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is announcing its intent
to establish a Wholesale Pork Reporting
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
(Committee). The Committee will
attempt to reach consensus on proposed
language that AMS will publish as a
proposed rule in the Federal Register.
The Committee will include
representatives of parties who would be
affected by a final rule. AMS solicits
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments on this initiative and requests
interested parties to nominate
representatives for membership on the
Committee.
DATES: Written comments and requests
for membership must be received on or
before December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments may
also be sent to Michael Lynch, Chief;
USDA, AMS, LS, LGMN Branch; 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Room 2619–S;
Washington, DC 20250; Telephone
number (202) 720–6231; or Fax (202)
690–3732.
Comments should reference docket
number AMS–LS–10–0080 and note the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register. Submitted
comments will be available for public
inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov, or during regular
business hours at the above address. All
comments submitted in response to this
document will be included in the record
and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made
public on the Internet at the address
provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Lynch, Chief; USDA, AMS, LS,
LGMN Branch; 1400 Independence
Ave., SW., Room 2619–S; Washington,
DC 20250; Telephone number (202)
720–6231; or Fax (202) 690–3732.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 1, 2000, AMS published
the final rule to implement the LMR
program as required by the Livestock
Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 (1999
Act) (7 U.S.C. 1635–1636h) [65 FR
75464]. The purpose of the 1999 Act
was to establish a program of
information regarding the marketing of
cattle, swine, lambs, and the products of
such livestock that provides information
that can be readily understood by
producers; improves the price and
supply reporting services of USDA; and
encourages competition in the
marketplace for livestock and livestock
products.
The statutory authority for the
program lapsed on September 30, 2005.
At that time, AMS sent letters to all
packers required to report under the
1999 Act, requesting they continue to
submit information voluntarily. In
October 2006, Congress enacted
legislation to reauthorize the 1999 Act
through September 30, 2010, and to
amend the swine reporting requirements
of the 1999 Act (Reauthorization Act)
E:\FR\FM\24NOP1.SGM
24NOP1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(Pub. L. 109–296). The Reauthorization
Act re-established the regulatory
authority for the continued operation of
the LMR program and separated the
reporting requirements for sows and
boars from barrows and gilts, among
other changes.
On May 16, 2008, USDA published
the final regulation to re-establish and
revise the LMR program (73 FR 28606).
The rule incorporated the swine
reporting changes contained within the
2006 Reauthorization Act, as well as
enhanced the program’s overall
effectiveness and efficiency based on
AMS’ experience in the administration
of the program. The LMR Final Rule
became effective on July 15, 2008. AMS
believed that the rule facilitated open,
transparent price discovery and
provided all market participants, both
large and small, with comparable levels
of market information for cattle, swine,
sheep, beef, and lamb meat.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy
Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L.
110–234) directed the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to conduct a
study to determine advantages,
drawbacks, and potential
implementation issues associated with
adopting mandatory wholesale pork
reporting. The report from this study
concluded that negotiated wholesale
pork price reporting is thin and
becoming thinner and found some
degree of support for moving to
mandatory price reporting exists at
every segment of the industry
interviewed. That study also concluded
that the benefits likely would exceed the
cost of moving from a voluntary to a
mandatory reporting program for
wholesale pork. The report was
delivered to Congress on March 25,
2010. A copy of the full report is
available on the AMS Web site at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/.
On September 28, 2010, the
Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010
(2010 Reauthorization Act) (Pub. L.
111–239) reauthorizing LMR for 5 years
and adding a provision for mandatory
reporting of wholesale pork cuts was
enacted. The 2010 Reauthorization Act
directs the Secretary to engage in
negotiated rulemaking to make required
regulatory changes for mandatory
wholesale pork reporting. The statute
requires that the Committee include
representatives from a specified list of
interests, as identified in paragraph IV,
B, Interests Involved, of this document.
Further, the 2010 Reauthorization Act
states that any negotiated rulemaking
committee established by the Secretary
shall not be subject to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C.
Appendix 2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
II. Statutory Provisions
The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of
1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C. 561–570); the
Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111–239); the Livestock
Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 (7
U.S.C. 1635–1636i); and 7 CFR part 59.
III. The Committee and Its Process
In a negotiated rulemaking, a
proposed rule is developed by a
committee composed of representatives
of government and the interests that will
be significantly affected by the rule.
Decisions are made by ‘‘consensus.’’ For
the purpose of this Committee’s
proceedings, ‘‘consensus’’ has been
statutorily defined as unanimous
concurrence among the interests
represented unless the Committee
agrees to a different definition.
Following receipt of comments on
membership, AMS will establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee
representing the identified interests to
negotiate the language of the proposed
rule. AMS will be a member of the
committee to represent the Federal
Government’s statutory mission.
Experience of various Federal
agencies in negotiated rulemaking has
demonstrated that using a trained
neutral party to facilitate the process
will assist all parties during negotiations
to identify their real interests, evaluate
their positions, communicate
effectively, find common ground, and
reach consensus where possible. AMS
plans to engage a third-party facilitator
for this process. The facilitator will
serve as the chairman of the Committee.
After the Committee reaches consensus
on the provisions of the proposed rule,
AMS agrees to publish the consensus
language reached by the committee in
the Federal Register.
Section 563 of the NRA requires the
head of the agency to determine that the
use of the negotiated rulemaking
procedure is in the public interest.
Implementation of mandatory pork
reporting is required by Congress.
Congress delegated responsibility to the
Secretary for determining what
information is necessary and
appropriate; and directed that a rule be
promulgated through the negotiated
rulemaking process. AMS expects the
Committee will address issues related
to, but not limited to, confidentiality,
transportation, frequency of reporting,
export data, and product heterogeneity.
IV. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with the NRA, AMS
will use the following procedures for
guidelines for this negotiated
rulemaking. Pursuant to the 2010
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71569
Reauthorization Act, this negotiated
rulemaking committee shall not be
subject to the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).
AMS may modify these procedures in
response to comments received on this
document or during the negotiation
process.
A. Committee Formation
A committee will be formed and
operated in full compliance with the
requirements of NRA.
B. Interests Involved
AMS intends to ensure full and
adequate representation of those
interests that are expected to be
significantly affected by the proposed
rule. In determining membership, AMS
will consider whether the interest
represented by a member will be
affected significantly by the final
product of the Committee and whether
that interest is already adequately
represented by other members. Under
Section 562(5) of the NRA, ‘‘interest’’
means, with respect to an issue or
matter, multiple parties which have a
similar point of view or which are likely
to be affected in a similar manner.
AMS is seeking comments on the
composition of the Committee and, in
Section D, Request for Nominations,
AMS provides a process for the public
to nominate organizations to be
appointed to the Committee. However,
to facilitate the process of identifying a
Committee and following guidelines
established by the 2010 Reauthorization
Act, AMS is proposing the following list
of organizations serve on the Committee
to adequately represent the stakeholders
affected by mandatory pork reporting.
(i) Organizations representing swine
producers—American Farm Bureau
Federation, National Farmers Union,
National Pork Producers Council;
(ii) Organizations representing
packers of pork, processors of pork,
retailers of pork, and buyers of
wholesale pork—American Frozen
Foods Institute, American Meat
Institute, Food Marketing Institute,
Grocery Manufacturers Association,
National Meat Association;
(iii) Department of Agriculture—AMS;
(iv) Among interested parties that
participate in swine or pork
production—Chicago Mercantile
Exchange, Livestock Marketing
Information Center, and other interested
parties.
C. Membership
As directed by the NRA, the
Committee should not exceed 25
members. Further, AMS believes that
this Committee will adequately
E:\FR\FM\24NOP1.SGM
24NOP1
71570
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
represent the interested parties and
operate most effectively with no more
than 12–16 members. The facilitator
will not count against the membership.
Section 568(c) of the NRA states:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking
committee shall be responsible for their own
expenses of participation in such committee,
except that an agency may, in accordance
with section 7(d) of the FACA, pay for a
member’s reasonable travel and per diem
expenses, expenses to obtain technical
assistance, and a reasonable rate of
compensation, if (1) Such member certifies a
lack of adequate financial resources to
participate in the committee; and (2) The
agency determines that such member’s
participation in the committee is necessary to
assure an adequate representation of the
member’s interest.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
D. Request for Nominations
AMS solicits nominations for
appointment to membership on the
Committee. Members can be individuals
or representatives of organizations. An
organization should identify the
individual who will be its
representative. Committee members
need to have authorization to negotiate
on behalf of their interests and be
willing to negotiate in good faith. AMS
interprets good faith to include: (1) A
willingness to bring all issues to the
table; and (2) not to discuss the issues
in other forums. Good faith also
includes a willingness to move away
from taking adversarial positions and
instead to explore openly all relevant
and productive ideas that may emerge
from the discussion of the Committee.
Authorization for each application or
nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or
nominee and a description of the
interests such person will represent;
2. A description of the person’s
qualifications and expertise regarding
those interests;
3. Whether the participant will be
seeking agency resources to participate
on the committee; and
4. A written commitment of the
applicant or nominee to actively
participate in good faith in the
negotiated rulemaking.
E. Tentative Schedule
Once AMS makes the final
determination on Committee
membership, it will publish another
document in the Federal Register
announcing the final list of members. A
proposed agenda and schedule for
completing the work of the Committee,
including a date for the first meeting,
will also be included in the document.
Once formally established and
assembled, the Committee will have
reasonable latitude to determine
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
appropriate number and frequency of
meetings necessary to achieve its
objectives. However, for planning
purposes, AMS expects the Committee
will meet three to four times at various
locations across the country. AMS
expects that each meeting will last
approximately three days. The
Committee’s work is expected to occur
over the course of 3 to 4 months in order
to allow sufficient time to reach
consensus for a proposed rule.
AMS and its facilitator will,
throughout the process, provide
necessary technical and logistical
support to the Committee. In addition,
once the Committee is established, it
may seek advisors or subject matter
experts to provide information valuable
to the decision-making process.
V. Requests for Nominations and
Comments
To comply with negotiated
rulemaking procedures, AMS invites
written comments on this initiative and
nominations for the negotiated
rulemaking committee. Nominations are
for all interests that could be affected by
mandatory pork reporting and must
comply with paragraph IV, D, Request
for Nominations, of this document. All
written comments and nominations
must be sent to an appropriate address
as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
Notice.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29551 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2009–BT–TP–0016]
RIN 1904–AB99
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedures for Fluorescent Lamp
Ballasts
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) proposes to revise its test
procedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts
established under the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act. The proposed test
method would eliminate the use of
photometric measurements in favor of
purely electrical measurements with the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
goal of reducing measurement variation.
Furthermore, this proposed test
procedure would measure a new metric,
ballast luminous efficiency (BLE),
which more directly assesses the
electrical losses in a ballast compared to
the existing ballast efficacy factor (BEF)
metric. Rather than testing a ballast with
a resistive load as proposed in the
March 24, 2010 notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR), the BLE test
procedure would measure the
performance of a ballast while operating
a fluorescent lamp.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information regarding this
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNOPR) no later than
December 27, 2010. See section V,
‘‘Public Participation,’’ of this SNOPR
for details.
ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted
must identify the Fluorescent Lamp
Ballast Active Mode Test Procedure
SNOPR, and provide the docket number
EERE–2009–BT–TP–0016 and/or
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1904–AB99. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: FLB-2009-TP0016@ee.doe.gov. Include the docket
number EERE–2009–BT–TP–0016 and/
or RIN 1904–AB99 in the subject line of
the message.
Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Please
submit one signed paper original.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. Please submit one
signed paper original.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see section V, ‘‘Public Participation,’’ of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, visit the U.S.
Department of Energy, 6th Floor, 950
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC
20024, (202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Please call Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 for
additional information regarding
visiting the Resource Room.
E:\FR\FM\24NOP1.SGM
24NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71568-71570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29551]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 59
[Doc. No. AMS-LS-10-0080]
Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee for Changes to
Livestock Mandatory Reporting
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) is announcing its intent to establish a Wholesale Pork
Reporting Negotiated Rulemaking Committee (Committee). The Committee
will attempt to reach consensus on proposed language that AMS will
publish as a proposed rule in the Federal Register. The Committee will
include representatives of parties who would be affected by a final
rule. AMS solicits comments on this initiative and requests interested
parties to nominate representatives for membership on the Committee.
DATES: Written comments and requests for membership must be received on
or before December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments may also be sent to Michael Lynch, Chief;
USDA, AMS, LS, LGMN Branch; 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 2619-S;
Washington, DC 20250; Telephone number (202) 720-6231; or Fax (202)
690-3732.
Comments should reference docket number AMS-LS-10-0080 and note the
date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. Submitted
comments will be available for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov, or during regular business hours at the above
address. All comments submitted in response to this document will be
included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting
the comments will be made public on the Internet at the address
provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Lynch, Chief; USDA, AMS, LS,
LGMN Branch; 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 2619-S; Washington, DC
20250; Telephone number (202) 720-6231; or Fax (202) 690-3732.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 1, 2000, AMS published the final rule to implement the
LMR program as required by the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of
1999 (1999 Act) (7 U.S.C. 1635-1636h) [65 FR 75464]. The purpose of the
1999 Act was to establish a program of information regarding the
marketing of cattle, swine, lambs, and the products of such livestock
that provides information that can be readily understood by producers;
improves the price and supply reporting services of USDA; and
encourages competition in the marketplace for livestock and livestock
products.
The statutory authority for the program lapsed on September 30,
2005. At that time, AMS sent letters to all packers required to report
under the 1999 Act, requesting they continue to submit information
voluntarily. In October 2006, Congress enacted legislation to
reauthorize the 1999 Act through September 30, 2010, and to amend the
swine reporting requirements of the 1999 Act (Reauthorization Act)
[[Page 71569]]
(Pub. L. 109-296). The Reauthorization Act re-established the
regulatory authority for the continued operation of the LMR program and
separated the reporting requirements for sows and boars from barrows
and gilts, among other changes.
On May 16, 2008, USDA published the final regulation to re-
establish and revise the LMR program (73 FR 28606). The rule
incorporated the swine reporting changes contained within the 2006
Reauthorization Act, as well as enhanced the program's overall
effectiveness and efficiency based on AMS' experience in the
administration of the program. The LMR Final Rule became effective on
July 15, 2008. AMS believed that the rule facilitated open, transparent
price discovery and provided all market participants, both large and
small, with comparable levels of market information for cattle, swine,
sheep, beef, and lamb meat.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill)
(Pub. L. 110-234) directed the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to
conduct a study to determine advantages, drawbacks, and potential
implementation issues associated with adopting mandatory wholesale pork
reporting. The report from this study concluded that negotiated
wholesale pork price reporting is thin and becoming thinner and found
some degree of support for moving to mandatory price reporting exists
at every segment of the industry interviewed. That study also concluded
that the benefits likely would exceed the cost of moving from a
voluntary to a mandatory reporting program for wholesale pork. The
report was delivered to Congress on March 25, 2010. A copy of the full
report is available on the AMS Web site at https://www.ams.usda.gov/.
On September 28, 2010, the Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010
(2010 Reauthorization Act) (Pub. L. 111-239) reauthorizing LMR for 5
years and adding a provision for mandatory reporting of wholesale pork
cuts was enacted. The 2010 Reauthorization Act directs the Secretary to
engage in negotiated rulemaking to make required regulatory changes for
mandatory wholesale pork reporting. The statute requires that the
Committee include representatives from a specified list of interests,
as identified in paragraph IV, B, Interests Involved, of this document.
Further, the 2010 Reauthorization Act states that any negotiated
rulemaking committee established by the Secretary shall not be subject
to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).
II. Statutory Provisions
The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C. 561-570); the
Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-239); the Livestock
Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 (7 U.S.C. 1635-1636i); and 7 CFR part
59.
III. The Committee and Its Process
In a negotiated rulemaking, a proposed rule is developed by a
committee composed of representatives of government and the interests
that will be significantly affected by the rule. Decisions are made by
``consensus.'' For the purpose of this Committee's proceedings,
``consensus'' has been statutorily defined as unanimous concurrence
among the interests represented unless the Committee agrees to a
different definition.
Following receipt of comments on membership, AMS will establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee representing the identified interests
to negotiate the language of the proposed rule. AMS will be a member of
the committee to represent the Federal Government's statutory mission.
Experience of various Federal agencies in negotiated rulemaking has
demonstrated that using a trained neutral party to facilitate the
process will assist all parties during negotiations to identify their
real interests, evaluate their positions, communicate effectively, find
common ground, and reach consensus where possible. AMS plans to engage
a third-party facilitator for this process. The facilitator will serve
as the chairman of the Committee. After the Committee reaches consensus
on the provisions of the proposed rule, AMS agrees to publish the
consensus language reached by the committee in the Federal Register.
Section 563 of the NRA requires the head of the agency to determine
that the use of the negotiated rulemaking procedure is in the public
interest. Implementation of mandatory pork reporting is required by
Congress. Congress delegated responsibility to the Secretary for
determining what information is necessary and appropriate; and directed
that a rule be promulgated through the negotiated rulemaking process.
AMS expects the Committee will address issues related to, but not
limited to, confidentiality, transportation, frequency of reporting,
export data, and product heterogeneity.
IV. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with the NRA, AMS will use the following procedures
for guidelines for this negotiated rulemaking. Pursuant to the 2010
Reauthorization Act, this negotiated rulemaking committee shall not be
subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).
AMS may modify these procedures in response to comments received on
this document or during the negotiation process.
A. Committee Formation
A committee will be formed and operated in full compliance with the
requirements of NRA.
B. Interests Involved
AMS intends to ensure full and adequate representation of those
interests that are expected to be significantly affected by the
proposed rule. In determining membership, AMS will consider whether the
interest represented by a member will be affected significantly by the
final product of the Committee and whether that interest is already
adequately represented by other members. Under Section 562(5) of the
NRA, ``interest'' means, with respect to an issue or matter, multiple
parties which have a similar point of view or which are likely to be
affected in a similar manner.
AMS is seeking comments on the composition of the Committee and, in
Section D, Request for Nominations, AMS provides a process for the
public to nominate organizations to be appointed to the Committee.
However, to facilitate the process of identifying a Committee and
following guidelines established by the 2010 Reauthorization Act, AMS
is proposing the following list of organizations serve on the Committee
to adequately represent the stakeholders affected by mandatory pork
reporting.
(i) Organizations representing swine producers--American Farm
Bureau Federation, National Farmers Union, National Pork Producers
Council;
(ii) Organizations representing packers of pork, processors of
pork, retailers of pork, and buyers of wholesale pork--American Frozen
Foods Institute, American Meat Institute, Food Marketing Institute,
Grocery Manufacturers Association, National Meat Association;
(iii) Department of Agriculture--AMS;
(iv) Among interested parties that participate in swine or pork
production--Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Livestock Marketing
Information Center, and other interested parties.
C. Membership
As directed by the NRA, the Committee should not exceed 25 members.
Further, AMS believes that this Committee will adequately
[[Page 71570]]
represent the interested parties and operate most effectively with no
more than 12-16 members. The facilitator will not count against the
membership. Section 568(c) of the NRA states:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking committee shall be
responsible for their own expenses of participation in such
committee, except that an agency may, in accordance with section
7(d) of the FACA, pay for a member's reasonable travel and per diem
expenses, expenses to obtain technical assistance, and a reasonable
rate of compensation, if (1) Such member certifies a lack of
adequate financial resources to participate in the committee; and
(2) The agency determines that such member's participation in the
committee is necessary to assure an adequate representation of the
member's interest.
D. Request for Nominations
AMS solicits nominations for appointment to membership on the
Committee. Members can be individuals or representatives of
organizations. An organization should identify the individual who will
be its representative. Committee members need to have authorization to
negotiate on behalf of their interests and be willing to negotiate in
good faith. AMS interprets good faith to include: (1) A willingness to
bring all issues to the table; and (2) not to discuss the issues in
other forums. Good faith also includes a willingness to move away from
taking adversarial positions and instead to explore openly all relevant
and productive ideas that may emerge from the discussion of the
Committee.
Authorization for each application or nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or nominee and a description of the
interests such person will represent;
2. A description of the person's qualifications and expertise
regarding those interests;
3. Whether the participant will be seeking agency resources to
participate on the committee; and
4. A written commitment of the applicant or nominee to actively
participate in good faith in the negotiated rulemaking.
E. Tentative Schedule
Once AMS makes the final determination on Committee membership, it
will publish another document in the Federal Register announcing the
final list of members. A proposed agenda and schedule for completing
the work of the Committee, including a date for the first meeting, will
also be included in the document.
Once formally established and assembled, the Committee will have
reasonable latitude to determine appropriate number and frequency of
meetings necessary to achieve its objectives. However, for planning
purposes, AMS expects the Committee will meet three to four times at
various locations across the country. AMS expects that each meeting
will last approximately three days. The Committee's work is expected to
occur over the course of 3 to 4 months in order to allow sufficient
time to reach consensus for a proposed rule.
AMS and its facilitator will, throughout the process, provide
necessary technical and logistical support to the Committee. In
addition, once the Committee is established, it may seek advisors or
subject matter experts to provide information valuable to the decision-
making process.
V. Requests for Nominations and Comments
To comply with negotiated rulemaking procedures, AMS invites
written comments on this initiative and nominations for the negotiated
rulemaking committee. Nominations are for all interests that could be
affected by mandatory pork reporting and must comply with paragraph IV,
D, Request for Nominations, of this document. All written comments and
nominations must be sent to an appropriate address as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Notice.
Dated: November 18, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29551 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P