Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Cost and Software Data Reporting System (DFARS Case 2008-D027), 71560-71562 [2010-29496]
Download as PDF
71560
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
calling (214) 665–7430 or by e-mail at
peace.michelle@epa.gov.
Because
EPA received adverse comments, we are
withdrawing the direct final exclusion
for ExxonMobil Refining and Supply
Company—Beaumont Refinery,
published on October 1, 2010, 75 FR
60632. We stated that in the direct final
rule that if we received adverse
comment by November 1, 2010, the
direct final rule would not take effect
and we would publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register. We
subsequently received adverse comment
on that direct final rule. We will address
the comments submitted in a
subsequent final action which will be
based on the parallel proposed rule also
published on October 1, 2010, 75 FR
60689. As stated in the direct final rule
and the parallel proposed rule, we will
not institute a second comment period
on this action.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 16, 2010.
Bill Luthans,
Acting Director, Multimedia Planning and
Permitting Division.
Accordingly, the amendments to the
rule published on October 1, 2010, 75
FR 60632 are withdrawn as of
November 24, 2010 until an action
making the exclusion final is published.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–29630 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 215, 234, 242, and 252
RIN 0750–AG46
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Cost and
Software Data Reporting System
(DFARS Case 2008–D027)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule to
amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
address DoD Cost and Software Data
Reporting system requirements for
Major Defense Acquisition Programs
and Major Automated Information
Systems.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: November 24,
2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
Ms.
Mary Overstreet, Telephone 703–602–
0311.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The DoD cost and software data
reporting (CSDR) system establishes
requirements for proposals and contract
performance for major defense
acquisition programs (as defined in 10
U.S.C. 2430) and major automated
information systems (as defined in 10
U.S.C. 2445a).
During the proposal process, offerors
are required to—
• Describe the process to be used to
satisfy the requirements of the CSDR
Manual (DoD 5000.04–M–1) and the
Government-approved CSDR plan; and
• Submit certain cost information
with the pricing proposal.
During contract performance, the
contractor is required to—
• Use a documented CSDR process
for reporting;
• Use the Government-approved
contract CSDR plan as the basis for
reporting; and
• Require subcontractors to comply
with the cost and software data
reporting requirements.
DoD published a proposed rule at 75
FR 25165 on May 7, 2010. The public
comment period closed July 6, 2010.
Two respondents submitted comments
that are grouped under four comment
categories. Based on public comments,
changes were made to the proposed
rule. Major changes in the final rule are
as follows:
• Explaining that the two principal
components of the CSDR system are the
contractor cost data reporting (CCDR)
and the software resources data
reporting (SRDR) (DFARS 234.7100(a)).
• Clarifying the solicitation and
contract clause prescriptions (DFARS
234.7101).
• Including the approval authority for
applying the CSDR requirements at
lower dollar thresholds (DFARS
234.7101(b)(2)).
• Removing the requirement to
submit DD Form 1921–2, Progress Curve
Report, with the offeror’s pricing
proposal (DFARS 252.234–7003(b)(6)).
• Removing the reference to DD Form
1921–3, Contractor Business Data
Report (DFARS 242.503–2(b) and
252.234–7004, Cost and Software Data
Reporting System).
• Restructuring the solicitation
provision to clarify proposal submission
requirements (DFARS 252.234–7003).
• Providing an Alternate I to the
solicitation provision and to the clause
to accommodate CSDR requirements at
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lower dollar thresholds (DFARS
252.234–7003 and 252.234–7004).
II. Discussion and Analysis
The following paragraphs address the
four categories of comments and DoD
responses:
1. DD 1921–2, Progress Curve Report
Comment: A respondent noted that
DD Form 1921–2 Progress Curve Report,
required to be submitted by offerors, in
accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of
DFARS 252.234–70XX in the proposed
rule, is designed to collect unit/lot cost
data and is, therefore, not applicable to
contracts that do not procure units or
lots. The respondent recommended
revising the solicitation requirements.
Response: DoD agrees that the DD
1921–2 is not required to be submitted
with the contractor’s pricing proposal
and has revised DFARS provision
252.234–7003 in the final rule
accordingly.
2. The DD 1921–3, Contractor Business
Data Report
a. Basis for Reporting
Comment: A respondent noted that
paragraph (a)(3) of DFARS 252.234–
70YY in the proposed rule directs ‘‘the
Contractor (to) use DD Form 1921–3,
Contractor Business Data Report, as the
basis for reporting in accordance with
the required CSDR data item
descriptions (DIDs).’’ DD Form 1921–3,
Contractor Business Data Report, is not
a basis for reporting, but is a report to
be prepared and submitted by the
contractor in accordance with DID DI–
FNCL–81765A. The respondent
suggested removing the reference to DD
Form 1921–3.
Response: DoD agrees and deleted the
requirement for DD Form 1921–3,
Contractor Business Data Report, from
clause 252.234–7004 in the final rule.
b. Exempt Below $50 Million
Comment: One respondent asked if a
subcontractor is exempt from reporting
if it incurs less than $50 million on a
program, or if the reporting
requirements apply to all levels of
subcontractors regardless of level of
participation in the program.
Response: DoD revised the solicitation
provision and contract clause to clarify
applicability to subcontracts.
c. Specific Guidance Is Necessary
Comment: One respondent had
numerous questions concerning the
completion of DD Form 1921–3.
Response: Questions relating to DD
Form 1921–3 preparation guidance are
outside the scope of this rule and
should be referred directly to the
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Defense Cost and Resource Center.
References to DD Form 1921–3 have
been removed from this final rule.
3. Solicitation Provision and Contract
Clause Prescriptions
Comment: A respondent noted that
‘‘Paragraphs (a) and (b) of 234.7101,
Solicitation provision and contract
clause, appear to be intended to
distinguish between solicitation
instructions and contract requirements,
as well as Contractor Cost Data
Reporting (CCDR) thresholds (> $50M)
versus Software Resources Data
Reporting (SRDR) thresholds (> $20M).’’
Accordingly, the respondent suggested
revising the paragraphs to clarify the
distinctions.
Response: DoD agrees and has revised
the cited paragraphs accordingly.
4. Contractor Cost and Data Reporting
Application
Comment: One respondent asked
whether cost allocations are going to be
considered valid contract costs and if
this supersedes FAR 31.201. The
respondent also asked what allowance
is provided for contractors with
accounting software that does not
accommodate the additional data fields
necessary to map the offeror’s
accounting system to the CCDR data
item descriptions.
Response: DoD notes that the 5000
series regulations express a strong
preference for actual cost data.
However, the use of cost allocations is
not prohibited; clause 252.234–7003
asks for actual cost data to be used ‘‘to
the maximum extent possible’’
(emphasis added). On the second point,
DoD notes that the required mapping
does not necessitate unique software
applications. DoD expects its
contractors to use standard and readily
available electronic software
applications such as electronic
spreadsheets (e.g., MS-Excel®) or word
processing formats (e.g., MS-Word®).
III. Executive Order 12866
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared a final regulatory
flexibility analysis consistent with 5
U.S.C. 604. A copy of the analysis may
be obtained from the individual
specified herein. The analysis is
summarized as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
The objective of the rule is to set forth
cost and software data reporting (CSDR)
system reporting requirements that are
essential for DoD to estimate the cost of
current and future weapon systems. The
data are also very useful in performing
contract price analysis, comparing
prices of similar systems, and for
capturing contractor-provided cost
estimates in standard formats to
facilitate comparison across several
contractors.
The rule will apply to DoD major
defense acquisition program (MDAP)
and major automated information
system (MAIS) contractors. Due to the
magnitude of these major programs,
most small businesses are not MDAP or
MAIS contractors. DoD solicited
comments from small entities and other
interested parties (proposed rule at 75
FR 25165). No comments were received
from small entities on the impact of this
rule and none of the comments was in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. Therefore, there is
no change to the rule in this regard.
This final rule sets forth existing DoD
CSDR requirements for weapon system
programs for proposal submission and
contract performance.
During the proposal process, in
response to solicitations, offerors are
required to—
• Describe the standard CSDR process
to be used to satisfy the requirements of
the CSDR Manual, DoD 5000.04–M–1,
and the Government approved CSDR
plan, DD Form 2794, and the related
Resource Distribution Table (RDT);
• Provide comments on the adequacy
of the CSDR contract plan, and the
related RDT contained in the
solicitation; and,
• Submit with their pricing proposal:
DD Form 1921, Cost Data Summary
Report, and DD Form 1921–1,
Functional Cost-Hour Report.
During contract performance, the
contractor will be required to—
• Utilize a documented CSDR process
that satisfies the guidelines contained in
the DoD 5000.04–M–1, CSDR Manual;
• Use management procedures that
provide for generation of timely and
reliable information for the two
principal components of the CSDR
system: Contractor cost data reports and
software resources data reports;
• Use the Government-approved
contract CSDR plan, DD Form 2794,
with the related RDT; and
• Require subcontractors, or
subcontracted effort if subcontractors
have not been selected, to comply with
the CSDR requirements.
This final rule is not expected to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71561
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., as
most MDAP and MAIS contractors are
large businesses. For reporting,
contractors are expected to use standard
and readily available electronic software
applications such as electronic
spreadsheets (e.g., MS-Excel®) or word
processing formats (e.g., MS-Word®) to
show the necessary mapping from their
accounting systems into the standard
CCDR formats.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements associated with this rule
were approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Clearance Number 0704–0188,
Acquisition Management Systems and
Data Requirements Control List. The
revisions in the final rule will not
change the burden hours approved
under Clearance Number 0704–0188.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215,
234, 242, and 252
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 234, 242,
and 252 are amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 215, 234, 242, and 252 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
215.403–5
■
[Removed]
2. Remove section 215.403–5.
PART 234—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
3. Subpart 234.71 is added to read as
follows:
■
Subpart 234.71—Cost and Software Data
Reporting
Sec.
234.7100 Policy.
234.7101 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
Subpart 234.71—Cost and Software
Data Reporting
234.7100
Policy.
(a) The cost and software data
reporting (CSDR) requirement is
mandatory for major defense acquisition
programs (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2430),
and major automated information
system programs (as defined in 10
U.S.C. 2445a) as specified in DoDI
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
71562
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
5000.02, Operation of the Defense
Acquisition System and the DoD
5000.04–M–1, CSDR Manual. The CSDR
system is applied in accordance with
the reporting requirements established
in DoDI 5000.02. The two principal
components of the CSDR system are
contractor cost data reporting and
software resources data reporting.
(b) Prior to contract award,
contracting officers shall consult with
the Defense Cost and Resource Center to
determine that the offeror selected for
award has proposed a standard CSDR
system, as described in the offeror’s
proposal in response to the provision at
252.234–7003, that is in compliance
with DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the
Defense Acquisition System, and the
DoD 5000.04–M–1, CSDR Manual.
(c) Contact information for the
Defense Cost and Resource Center and
the Deputy Director, Cost Assessment, is
located at PGI 234.7100.
234.7101 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
(a)(1) Use the provision at 252.234–
7003, Notice of Cost and Software Data
Reporting System, in all solicitations
that include the clause at 252.234–7004,
Cost and Software Data Reporting.
(2) Use the provision with its
Alternate I when the clause at 252.234–
7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting,
is used with its Alternate I.
(b)(1) Use the clause at 252.234–7004,
Cost and Software Data Reporting
System, in all solicitations and contracts
for major defense acquisition programs
and major automated information
system programs that exceed $50
million.
(2) Use the clause with its Alternate
I in solicitations and contracts for major
defense acquisition programs and major
automated information system programs
with a value equal to or greater than $20
million but less than or equal to $50
million, when so directed by the
program manager with the approval of
the OSD Deputy Director, Cost
Assessment.
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
4. Designate the current text of section
242.503–2 as paragraph (a) and add new
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
242.503–2 Postaward conference
procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) For contracts that include the
clause at 252.234–7004, Cost and
Software Data Reporting, postaward
conferences shall include a discussion
of the contractor’s standard cost and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Nov 23, 2010
Jkt 223001
software data reporting (CSDR) process
that satisfies the guidelines contained in
the DoD 5000.04–M–1, CSDR Manual,
and the requirements in the
Government-approved CSDR plan for
the contract, DD Form 2794, and related
Resource Distribution Table.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
5. Add section 252.234–7003 to read
as follows:
■
252.234–7003 Notice of Cost and Software
Data Reporting System. (NOV 2010)
As prescribed in 234–7101(a)(1), use
the following provision:
NOTICE OF COST AND SOFTWARE
DATA REPORTING SYSTEM (NOV
2010)
(a) This solicitation includes—
(1) The Government-approved cost and
software data reporting (CSDR) plan for the
contract, DD Form 2794; and
(2) The related Resource Distribution
Table.
(b) As part of its proposal, the offeror
shall—
(1) Describe the process to be used to
satisfy the requirements of the DoD 5000.04–
M–1, CSDR Manual, and the Governmentapproved CSDR plan for the proposed
contract;
(2) Demonstrate how contractor cost and
data reporting (CCDR) will be based, to the
maximum extent possible, upon actual cost
transactions and not cost allocations;
(3) Demonstrate how the data from its
accounting system will be mapped into the
standard reporting categories required in the
CCDR data item descriptions;
(4) Describe how recurring and
nonrecurring costs will be segregated;
(5) Provide comments on the adequacy of
the CSDR contract plan and related Resource
Distribution Table; and
(6) Submit the DD Form 1921, Cost Data
Summary Report, and DD Form 1921–1,
Functional Cost-Hour Report, with its pricing
proposal.
(c) CSDR reporting will be required for
subcontractors at any tier with a subcontract
that exceeds $50 million. The offeror shall
identify, by providing comments on the
Resource Distribution Table, the
subcontractors, or, if the subcontractors have
not been selected, the subcontracted effort in
this category.
(End of provision)
Alternate I (NOV 2010). As prescribed
in 234.7101(a)(2), substitute the
following paragraph (c) for paragraph (c)
of the basic provision:
(c) CSDR reporting will be required for
subcontractors for selected subcontracts
identified in the CSDR contract plan as
requiring such reporting. The offeror shall
identify, by providing comments on the
Resource Distribution Table, the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subcontractors, or, if the subcontractors have
not been selected, the subcontracted effort.
6. Add section 252.234–7004 to read
as follows:
■
252.234–7004 Cost and Software Data
Reporting System. (NOV 2010)
As prescribed in 234.7101(b)(1), use
the following clause:
COST AND SOFTWARE DATA
REPORTING SYSTEM (NOV 2010)
(a) In the performance of this contract, the
Contractor shall use—
(1) A documented standard cost and
software data reporting (CSDR) process that
satisfies the guidelines contained in the DoD
5000.04–M–1, CSDR Manual;
(2) Management procedures that provide
for generation of timely and reliable
information for the contractor cost data
reports (CCDRs) and software resources data
reports (SRDRs) required by the CCDR and
SRDR data items of this contract; and
(3) The Government-approved CSDR plan
for this contract, DD Form 2794, and the
related Resource Distribution Table as the
basis for reporting in accordance with the
required CSDR data item descriptions.
(b) The Contractor shall require CSDR
reporting from subcontractors at any tier with
a subcontract that exceeds $50 million. If, for
subcontracts that exceed $50 million, the
Contractor changes subcontractors or makes
new subcontract awards, the Contractor shall
notify the Government.
(End of clause)
Alternate I (NOV 2010). As prescribed
in 234.7101(b)(2), substitute the
following paragraph (b) for paragraph
(b) of the basic clause:
(b) The Contractor shall require CSDR
reporting from selected subcontractors
identified in the CSDR contract plan as
requiring such reporting. If the Contractor
changes subcontractors or makes new awards
for selected subcontract effort, the Contractor
shall notify the Government.
[FR Doc. 2010–29496 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 217, 234, and 235
RIN 0750–AG76
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contract
Authority for Advanced Component
Development or Prototype Units
(DFARS Case 2009–D034)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Confirmation of interim final
rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71560-71562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29496]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 215, 234, 242, and 252
RIN 0750-AG46
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Cost and
Software Data Reporting System (DFARS Case 2008-D027)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule to amend the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to address DoD Cost and
Software Data Reporting system requirements for Major Defense
Acquisition Programs and Major Automated Information Systems.
DATES: Effective Date: November 24, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Overstreet, Telephone 703-
602-0311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The DoD cost and software data reporting (CSDR) system establishes
requirements for proposals and contract performance for major defense
acquisition programs (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2430) and major automated
information systems (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 2445a).
During the proposal process, offerors are required to--
Describe the process to be used to satisfy the
requirements of the CSDR Manual (DoD 5000.04-M-1) and the Government-
approved CSDR plan; and
Submit certain cost information with the pricing proposal.
During contract performance, the contractor is required to--
Use a documented CSDR process for reporting;
Use the Government-approved contract CSDR plan as the
basis for reporting; and
Require subcontractors to comply with the cost and
software data reporting requirements.
DoD published a proposed rule at 75 FR 25165 on May 7, 2010. The
public comment period closed July 6, 2010. Two respondents submitted
comments that are grouped under four comment categories. Based on
public comments, changes were made to the proposed rule. Major changes
in the final rule are as follows:
Explaining that the two principal components of the CSDR
system are the contractor cost data reporting (CCDR) and the software
resources data reporting (SRDR) (DFARS 234.7100(a)).
Clarifying the solicitation and contract clause
prescriptions (DFARS 234.7101).
Including the approval authority for applying the CSDR
requirements at lower dollar thresholds (DFARS 234.7101(b)(2)).
Removing the requirement to submit DD Form 1921-2,
Progress Curve Report, with the offeror's pricing proposal (DFARS
252.234-7003(b)(6)).
Removing the reference to DD Form 1921-3, Contractor
Business Data Report (DFARS 242.503-2(b) and 252.234-7004, Cost and
Software Data Reporting System).
Restructuring the solicitation provision to clarify
proposal submission requirements (DFARS 252.234-7003).
Providing an Alternate I to the solicitation provision and
to the clause to accommodate CSDR requirements at lower dollar
thresholds (DFARS 252.234-7003 and 252.234-7004).
II. Discussion and Analysis
The following paragraphs address the four categories of comments
and DoD responses:
1. DD 1921-2, Progress Curve Report
Comment: A respondent noted that DD Form 1921-2 Progress Curve
Report, required to be submitted by offerors, in accordance with
paragraph (a)(3) of DFARS 252.234-70XX in the proposed rule, is
designed to collect unit/lot cost data and is, therefore, not
applicable to contracts that do not procure units or lots. The
respondent recommended revising the solicitation requirements.
Response: DoD agrees that the DD 1921-2 is not required to be
submitted with the contractor's pricing proposal and has revised DFARS
provision 252.234-7003 in the final rule accordingly.
2. The DD 1921-3, Contractor Business Data Report
a. Basis for Reporting
Comment: A respondent noted that paragraph (a)(3) of DFARS 252.234-
70YY in the proposed rule directs ``the Contractor (to) use DD Form
1921-3, Contractor Business Data Report, as the basis for reporting in
accordance with the required CSDR data item descriptions (DIDs).'' DD
Form 1921-3, Contractor Business Data Report, is not a basis for
reporting, but is a report to be prepared and submitted by the
contractor in accordance with DID DI-FNCL-81765A. The respondent
suggested removing the reference to DD Form 1921-3.
Response: DoD agrees and deleted the requirement for DD Form 1921-
3, Contractor Business Data Report, from clause 252.234-7004 in the
final rule.
b. Exempt Below $50 Million
Comment: One respondent asked if a subcontractor is exempt from
reporting if it incurs less than $50 million on a program, or if the
reporting requirements apply to all levels of subcontractors regardless
of level of participation in the program.
Response: DoD revised the solicitation provision and contract
clause to clarify applicability to subcontracts.
c. Specific Guidance Is Necessary
Comment: One respondent had numerous questions concerning the
completion of DD Form 1921-3.
Response: Questions relating to DD Form 1921-3 preparation guidance
are outside the scope of this rule and should be referred directly to
the
[[Page 71561]]
Defense Cost and Resource Center. References to DD Form 1921-3 have
been removed from this final rule.
3. Solicitation Provision and Contract Clause Prescriptions
Comment: A respondent noted that ``Paragraphs (a) and (b) of
234.7101, Solicitation provision and contract clause, appear to be
intended to distinguish between solicitation instructions and contract
requirements, as well as Contractor Cost Data Reporting (CCDR)
thresholds (> $50M) versus Software Resources Data Reporting (SRDR)
thresholds (> $20M).'' Accordingly, the respondent suggested revising
the paragraphs to clarify the distinctions.
Response: DoD agrees and has revised the cited paragraphs
accordingly.
4. Contractor Cost and Data Reporting Application
Comment: One respondent asked whether cost allocations are going to
be considered valid contract costs and if this supersedes FAR 31.201.
The respondent also asked what allowance is provided for contractors
with accounting software that does not accommodate the additional data
fields necessary to map the offeror's accounting system to the CCDR
data item descriptions.
Response: DoD notes that the 5000 series regulations express a
strong preference for actual cost data. However, the use of cost
allocations is not prohibited; clause 252.234-7003 asks for actual cost
data to be used ``to the maximum extent possible'' (emphasis added). On
the second point, DoD notes that the required mapping does not
necessitate unique software applications. DoD expects its contractors
to use standard and readily available electronic software applications
such as electronic spreadsheets (e.g., MS-Excel[supreg]) or word
processing formats (e.g., MS-Word[supreg]).
III. Executive Order 12866
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared a final regulatory flexibility analysis consistent
with 5 U.S.C. 604. A copy of the analysis may be obtained from the
individual specified herein. The analysis is summarized as follows:
The objective of the rule is to set forth cost and software data
reporting (CSDR) system reporting requirements that are essential for
DoD to estimate the cost of current and future weapon systems. The data
are also very useful in performing contract price analysis, comparing
prices of similar systems, and for capturing contractor-provided cost
estimates in standard formats to facilitate comparison across several
contractors.
The rule will apply to DoD major defense acquisition program (MDAP)
and major automated information system (MAIS) contractors. Due to the
magnitude of these major programs, most small businesses are not MDAP
or MAIS contractors. DoD solicited comments from small entities and
other interested parties (proposed rule at 75 FR 25165). No comments
were received from small entities on the impact of this rule and none
of the comments was in response to the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis. Therefore, there is no change to the rule in this regard.
This final rule sets forth existing DoD CSDR requirements for
weapon system programs for proposal submission and contract
performance.
During the proposal process, in response to solicitations, offerors
are required to--
Describe the standard CSDR process to be used to satisfy
the requirements of the CSDR Manual, DoD 5000.04-M-1, and the
Government approved CSDR plan, DD Form 2794, and the related Resource
Distribution Table (RDT);
Provide comments on the adequacy of the CSDR contract
plan, and the related RDT contained in the solicitation; and,
Submit with their pricing proposal: DD Form 1921, Cost
Data Summary Report, and DD Form 1921-1, Functional Cost-Hour Report.
During contract performance, the contractor will be required to--
Utilize a documented CSDR process that satisfies the
guidelines contained in the DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual;
Use management procedures that provide for generation of
timely and reliable information for the two principal components of the
CSDR system: Contractor cost data reports and software resources data
reports;
Use the Government-approved contract CSDR plan, DD Form
2794, with the related RDT; and
Require subcontractors, or subcontracted effort if
subcontractors have not been selected, to comply with the CSDR
requirements.
This final rule is not expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., as most MDAP and
MAIS contractors are large businesses. For reporting, contractors are
expected to use standard and readily available electronic software
applications such as electronic spreadsheets (e.g., MS-Excel[supreg])
or word processing formats (e.g., MS-Word[supreg]) to show the
necessary mapping from their accounting systems into the standard CCDR
formats.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements associated with this rule
were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Clearance
Number 0704-0188, Acquisition Management Systems and Data Requirements
Control List. The revisions in the final rule will not change the
burden hours approved under Clearance Number 0704-0188.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215, 234, 242, and 252
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
0
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 234, 242, and 252 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 215, 234, 242, and 252
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
215.403-5 [Removed]
0
2. Remove section 215.403-5.
PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
0
3. Subpart 234.71 is added to read as follows:
Subpart 234.71--Cost and Software Data Reporting
Sec.
234.7100 Policy.
234.7101 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
Subpart 234.71--Cost and Software Data Reporting
234.7100 Policy.
(a) The cost and software data reporting (CSDR) requirement is
mandatory for major defense acquisition programs (as defined in 10
U.S.C. 2430), and major automated information system programs (as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 2445a) as specified in DoDI
[[Page 71562]]
5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System and the DoD
5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual. The CSDR system is applied in accordance with
the reporting requirements established in DoDI 5000.02. The two
principal components of the CSDR system are contractor cost data
reporting and software resources data reporting.
(b) Prior to contract award, contracting officers shall consult
with the Defense Cost and Resource Center to determine that the offeror
selected for award has proposed a standard CSDR system, as described in
the offeror's proposal in response to the provision at 252.234-7003,
that is in compliance with DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Defense
Acquisition System, and the DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual.
(c) Contact information for the Defense Cost and Resource Center
and the Deputy Director, Cost Assessment, is located at PGI 234.7100.
234.7101 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
(a)(1) Use the provision at 252.234-7003, Notice of Cost and
Software Data Reporting System, in all solicitations that include the
clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting.
(2) Use the provision with its Alternate I when the clause at
252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting, is used with its
Alternate I.
(b)(1) Use the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data
Reporting System, in all solicitations and contracts for major defense
acquisition programs and major automated information system programs
that exceed $50 million.
(2) Use the clause with its Alternate I in solicitations and
contracts for major defense acquisition programs and major automated
information system programs with a value equal to or greater than $20
million but less than or equal to $50 million, when so directed by the
program manager with the approval of the OSD Deputy Director, Cost
Assessment.
PART 242--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
0
4. Designate the current text of section 242.503-2 as paragraph (a) and
add new paragraph (b) to read as follows:
242.503-2 Postaward conference procedure.
* * * * *
(b) For contracts that include the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and
Software Data Reporting, postaward conferences shall include a
discussion of the contractor's standard cost and software data
reporting (CSDR) process that satisfies the guidelines contained in the
DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual, and the requirements in the Government-
approved CSDR plan for the contract, DD Form 2794, and related Resource
Distribution Table.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
5. Add section 252.234-7003 to read as follows:
252.234-7003 Notice of Cost and Software Data Reporting System. (NOV
2010)
As prescribed in 234-7101(a)(1), use the following provision:
NOTICE OF COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING SYSTEM (NOV 2010)
(a) This solicitation includes--
(1) The Government-approved cost and software data reporting
(CSDR) plan for the contract, DD Form 2794; and
(2) The related Resource Distribution Table.
(b) As part of its proposal, the offeror shall--
(1) Describe the process to be used to satisfy the requirements
of the DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual, and the Government-approved
CSDR plan for the proposed contract;
(2) Demonstrate how contractor cost and data reporting (CCDR)
will be based, to the maximum extent possible, upon actual cost
transactions and not cost allocations;
(3) Demonstrate how the data from its accounting system will be
mapped into the standard reporting categories required in the CCDR
data item descriptions;
(4) Describe how recurring and nonrecurring costs will be
segregated;
(5) Provide comments on the adequacy of the CSDR contract plan
and related Resource Distribution Table; and
(6) Submit the DD Form 1921, Cost Data Summary Report, and DD
Form 1921-1, Functional Cost-Hour Report, with its pricing proposal.
(c) CSDR reporting will be required for subcontractors at any
tier with a subcontract that exceeds $50 million. The offeror shall
identify, by providing comments on the Resource Distribution Table,
the subcontractors, or, if the subcontractors have not been
selected, the subcontracted effort in this category.
(End of provision)
Alternate I (NOV 2010). As prescribed in 234.7101(a)(2), substitute
the following paragraph (c) for paragraph (c) of the basic provision:
(c) CSDR reporting will be required for subcontractors for
selected subcontracts identified in the CSDR contract plan as
requiring such reporting. The offeror shall identify, by providing
comments on the Resource Distribution Table, the subcontractors, or,
if the subcontractors have not been selected, the subcontracted
effort.
0
6. Add section 252.234-7004 to read as follows:
252.234-7004 Cost and Software Data Reporting System. (NOV 2010)
As prescribed in 234.7101(b)(1), use the following clause:
COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING SYSTEM (NOV 2010)
(a) In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall
use--
(1) A documented standard cost and software data reporting
(CSDR) process that satisfies the guidelines contained in the DoD
5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual;
(2) Management procedures that provide for generation of timely
and reliable information for the contractor cost data reports
(CCDRs) and software resources data reports (SRDRs) required by the
CCDR and SRDR data items of this contract; and
(3) The Government-approved CSDR plan for this contract, DD Form
2794, and the related Resource Distribution Table as the basis for
reporting in accordance with the required CSDR data item
descriptions.
(b) The Contractor shall require CSDR reporting from
subcontractors at any tier with a subcontract that exceeds $50
million. If, for subcontracts that exceed $50 million, the
Contractor changes subcontractors or makes new subcontract awards,
the Contractor shall notify the Government.
(End of clause)
Alternate I (NOV 2010). As prescribed in 234.7101(b)(2), substitute
the following paragraph (b) for paragraph (b) of the basic clause:
(b) The Contractor shall require CSDR reporting from selected
subcontractors identified in the CSDR contract plan as requiring
such reporting. If the Contractor changes subcontractors or makes
new awards for selected subcontract effort, the Contractor shall
notify the Government.
[FR Doc. 2010-29496 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P