Airworthiness Directives; Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH Models TAE 125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 Reciprocating Engines, 71371-71373 [2010-29449]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
7, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc.
airplanes, certificated in any category,
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD.
(1) Model DHC–8–102, –103, –106, –201,
–202, –301, –311, and –315, serial numbers
003 through 566 inclusive.
(2) Model DHC–8–401, and –402 airplanes,
serial numbers 4001, 4003, 4004, 4006, and
4008 through 4274 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 56: Windows.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
There have been several in-service reports
of finding trapped water on the bottom of the
cockpit windshield frames (or lower
windshield frames) that resulted in either
corrosion or water ingress into the cockpit. In
one occurrence, the trapped water caused
severe corrosion of numerous anchor nuts
that secure the windshield to the lower
windshield frame, such that the intended
fastening function was seriously
compromised. Corrosion of the lower
windshield frames, including the anchor nuts
that secure the windshield to the aircraft
structure, can result in a serious structural
degradation possibly leading to the loss of
the windshield during flight. Also, water
could leak into the cockpit and cause either
a malfunction or failure of the electrical and
electronics systems in the area of the cockpit
instrument panels.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Actions
(g) Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, install a drain system in the
cockpit windshield lower frames, and do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance With the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8–53–78, Revision C, dated
April 29, 2010 (for Model DHC–8–102, –103,
–106, –201, –202, –301, –311, and –315
airplanes); or 84–53–43, dated April 27, 2010
(for Model DHC–8–401 and –402 airplanes);
except where the service bulletins state to
contact the manufacturer, contact the New
York Aircraft Certification Office or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) or
its delegated agent. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:36 Nov 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(h) For Models DHC–8–102, –103, –106,
–201, –202, –301, –311, and –315 airplanes:
Modification of the drain system is also
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, if
done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin
8–53–78, dated December 23, 1999; Revision
A, dated June 7, 2001; or Revision B, dated
May 2, 2002.
FAA AD Differences
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, ANE–170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2010–16, dated May 18, 2010;
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–53–78,
Revision C, dated April 29, 2010; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–53–43, dated
April 27, 2010; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 15, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29448 Filed 11–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
PO 00000
71371
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0820; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–31–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Thielert
Aircraft Engines GmbH Models TAE
125–01, TAE 125–02–99, and TAE 125–
02–114 Reciprocating Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
Service experience has shown that a case
of FADEC channel B manifold air pressure
(MAP) sensor hose permeability is not always
recognized as fault by the FADEC. The MAP
value measured by the sensor may be lower
than the actual pressure value in the engine
manifold, and limits the amount of fuel
injected into the combustion chamber and
thus the available power of the engine. A
change in FADEC software version 2.91 will
change the logic in failure detection and in
switching to channel B (no automatic switch
to channel B if MAP difference between
channel A and B is detected and lower MAP
is at channel B).
In addition, previous software versions
allow—under certain conditions and on DA
42 aircraft only—the initiation of a FADEC
self test during flight that causes an engine
in-flight shutdown.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
engine in-flight shutdown or power loss,
possibly resulting in reduced control of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
71372
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Contact Thielert Aircraft Engines
GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14 D–09350,
Lichtenstein, Germany, telephone: +49–
37204–696–0; fax: +49–37204–696–
2912; e-mail: info@centurionengines.com for the service information
identified in this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (phone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0820; Directorate Identifier
2010–NE–31–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:36 Nov 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD 2010–0137,
dated June 30, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Service experience has shown that a case
of FADEC channel B manifold air pressure
(MAP) sensor hose permeability is not always
recognized as fault by the FADEC. The MAP
value measured by the sensor may be lower
than the actual pressure value in the engine
manifold, and limits the amount of fuel
injected into the combustion chamber and
thus the available power of the engine. A
change in FADEC software version 2.91 will
change the logic in failure detection and in
switching to channel B (no automatic switch
to channel B if MAP difference between
channel A and B is detected and lower MAP
is at channel B).
In addition, previous software versions
allow—under certain conditions and on DA
42 aircraft only—the initiation of a FADEC
self test during flight that causes an engine
in-flight shutdown.
We are proposing to require
installation of full-authority digital
electronic control (FADEC) software
version 2.91 to prevent automatic
switching to channel B if the channel B
MAP sensor hose is leaking. The current
software cannot detect the difference
between a manifold leak and a real
manifold pressure change. This software
installation will prevent the undesired
limiting of fuel to the engine. Installing
FADEC software version 2.91 will also
prevent the FADEC from self-testing
during flight, which would cause an
engine in-flight shutdown.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of Germany
and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Germany, EASA has
notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI. We are
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposing this AD because we evaluated
all information provided by EASA and
determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design. This
proposed AD would require installing
full authority digital electronic control
software version 2.91.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 112 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 0.5
work-hour per engine to comply with
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. There are no
required parts cost. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$4,760.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
(i) For TAE 125–01 engines, Operation &
Maintenance Manual OM–01–02, Issue 3,
Revision 13.
(ii) For TAE 125–02–99 and TAE 125–02–
114 engines, Operation & Maintenance
Manual OM–02–02, Issue 1, Revision 10.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Prohibition of FADEC Software Earlier
Versions
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
(f) Once FADEC software version 2.91 is
installed, do not install any earlier version of
FADEC software.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH: Docket No.
FAA–2010–0820; Directorate Identifier
2010–NE–31–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
7, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Thielert Aircraft
Engines GmbH models TAE 125–01, TAE
125–02–99, and TAE 125–02–114
reciprocating engines installed in, but not
limited to, Cessna 172 and (Reims-built) F172
series (European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) STC No. EASA.A.S.01527); Piper
PA–28 series (EASA STC No. EASA.A.S.
01632); APEX (Robin) DR 400 series (EASA
STC No. A.S.01380); and Diamond Aircraft
Industries Models DA 40, DA 42, and DA
42M NG airplanes.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Reason
(d) This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. We are
issuing this AD to prevent engine in-flight
shutdown or power loss, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the airplane.
FAA AD Differences
(g) EASA AD 2010–0137 permits
installation of earlier FADEC software
versions, once version 2.91 is installed. This
AD does not.
(h) EASA AD 2010–0137 requires
compliance within 110 flight hours after the
effective date of the AD or during next
maintenance, whichever occurs first, but no
later than 6 months after the effective date of
the AD. This AD requires compliance within
110 flight hours after the effective date of the
AD or during next maintenance, whichever
occurs first.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCS)
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Refer to AD 2010–0137, dated June 30,
2010, for related information. Contact
Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH,
Platanenstrasse 14 D–09350, Lichtenstein,
Germany, telephone: +49–37204–696–0; fax:
+49–37204–696–2912; e-mail:
info@centurion-engines.com, for a copy of
the service information referenced in this
AD.
(k) Contact Alan Strom, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 16, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29449 Filed 11–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 110 flight hours after the
effective date of the AD or during next
maintenance, whichever occurs first, install
full-authority digital electronic control
(FADEC) software version 2.91.
(2) Guidance on FADEC software
installation can be found in the following:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:36 Nov 22, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71373
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0494; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–20–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; International
Aero Engines V2500–A1, V2522–A5,
V2524–A5, V2525–D5, V2527–A5,
V2527E–A5, V2527M–A5, V2528–D5,
V2530–A5, and V2533–A5 Turbofan
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
International Aero Engines (IAE)
V2500–A1, V2522–A5, V2524–A5,
V2525–D5, V2527–A5, V2527E–A5,
V2527M–A5, V2528–D5, V2530–A5,
and V2533–A5 turbofan engines. This
proposed AD would require initial and
repetitive 360° borescope inspections of
high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 1
blade outer air seal segments for
evidence of certain distress conditions.
This proposed AD would also require
incorporation of improved durability
stage 1 blade outer air seal segments at
the next exposure to the HPT module
subassembly, as terminating action to
the repetitive inspections. This
proposed AD results from three reports
received of HPT case burn-through
events, numerous shop reports of loss of
stage 1 blade outer air seal segments,
and HPT case bulging. We are proposing
this AD to prevent HPT case burnthrough, uncontrolled under-cowl
engine fire, and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by January 24,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71371-71373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29449]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0820; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH Models
TAE 125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 Reciprocating Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Service experience has shown that a case of FADEC channel B
manifold air pressure (MAP) sensor hose permeability is not always
recognized as fault by the FADEC. The MAP value measured by the
sensor may be lower than the actual pressure value in the engine
manifold, and limits the amount of fuel injected into the combustion
chamber and thus the available power of the engine. A change in
FADEC software version 2.91 will change the logic in failure
detection and in switching to channel B (no automatic switch to
channel B if MAP difference between channel A and B is detected and
lower MAP is at channel B).
In addition, previous software versions allow--under certain
conditions and on DA 42 aircraft only--the initiation of a FADEC
self test during flight that causes an engine in-flight shutdown.
We are proposing this AD to prevent engine in-flight shutdown or
power loss, possibly resulting in reduced control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
[[Page 71372]]
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Contact Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14 D-09350,
Lichtenstein, Germany, telephone: +49-37204-696-0; fax: +49-37204-696-
2912; e-mail: engines.com">info@centurion-engines.com for the service information
identified in this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (phone (800) 647-5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7143; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0820;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
2010-0137, dated June 30, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
Service experience has shown that a case of FADEC channel B
manifold air pressure (MAP) sensor hose permeability is not always
recognized as fault by the FADEC. The MAP value measured by the
sensor may be lower than the actual pressure value in the engine
manifold, and limits the amount of fuel injected into the combustion
chamber and thus the available power of the engine. A change in
FADEC software version 2.91 will change the logic in failure
detection and in switching to channel B (no automatic switch to
channel B if MAP difference between channel A and B is detected and
lower MAP is at channel B).
In addition, previous software versions allow--under certain
conditions and on DA 42 aircraft only--the initiation of a FADEC
self test during flight that causes an engine in-flight shutdown.
We are proposing to require installation of full-authority digital
electronic control (FADEC) software version 2.91 to prevent automatic
switching to channel B if the channel B MAP sensor hose is leaking. The
current software cannot detect the difference between a manifold leak
and a real manifold pressure change. This software installation will
prevent the undesired limiting of fuel to the engine. Installing FADEC
software version 2.91 will also prevent the FADEC from self-testing
during flight, which would cause an engine in-flight shutdown.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
Germany and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA has notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design. This proposed AD would require
installing full authority digital electronic control software version
2.91.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 112 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 0.5 work-hour per engine to
comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-
hour. There are no required parts cost. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $4,760.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 71373]]
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2010-0820;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-31-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 7, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH models TAE
125-01, TAE 125-02-99, and TAE 125-02-114 reciprocating engines
installed in, but not limited to, Cessna 172 and (Reims-built) F172
series (European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) STC No.
EASA.A.S.01527); Piper PA-28 series (EASA STC No. EASA.A.S. 01632);
APEX (Robin) DR 400 series (EASA STC No. A.S.01380); and Diamond
Aircraft Industries Models DA 40, DA 42, and DA 42M NG airplanes.
Reason
(d) This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. We are issuing this AD to prevent engine in-flight shutdown
or power loss, possibly resulting in reduced control of the
airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 110 flight hours after the effective date of the AD
or during next maintenance, whichever occurs first, install full-
authority digital electronic control (FADEC) software version 2.91.
(2) Guidance on FADEC software installation can be found in the
following:
(i) For TAE 125-01 engines, Operation & Maintenance Manual OM-
01-02, Issue 3, Revision 13.
(ii) For TAE 125-02-99 and TAE 125-02-114 engines, Operation &
Maintenance Manual OM-02-02, Issue 1, Revision 10.
Prohibition of FADEC Software Earlier Versions
(f) Once FADEC software version 2.91 is installed, do not
install any earlier version of FADEC software.
FAA AD Differences
(g) EASA AD 2010-0137 permits installation of earlier FADEC
software versions, once version 2.91 is installed. This AD does not.
(h) EASA AD 2010-0137 requires compliance within 110 flight
hours after the effective date of the AD or during next maintenance,
whichever occurs first, but no later than 6 months after the
effective date of the AD. This AD requires compliance within 110
flight hours after the effective date of the AD or during next
maintenance, whichever occurs first.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCS)
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Refer to AD 2010-0137, dated June 30, 2010, for related
information. Contact Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH, Platanenstrasse
14 D-09350, Lichtenstein, Germany, telephone: +49-37204-696-0; fax:
+49-37204-696-2912; e-mail: engines.com">info@centurion-engines.com, for a copy
of the service information referenced in this AD.
(k) Contact Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238-7143; fax (781) 238-7199, for more information
about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 16, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29449 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P