Environmental Impact Statement: San Diego County, CA, 71179-71180 [2010-29338]

Download as PDF jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 37. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State 820, ABR–201010037, Gaines Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010, including a partial waiver of 18 CFR 806.15. 38. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State 818, ABR–201010038, Elk Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010, including a partial waiver of 18 CFR 806.15. 39. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State 816, ABR–201010039, Elk Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010, including a partial waiver of 18 CFR 806.15. 40. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Westbrook 487, ABR– 201010040, Richmond Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 41. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Berguson 622, ABR–201010041, Covington Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 42. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Zimmer 586, ABR–201010042, Covington Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 43. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Stevens 413, ABR–201010043, Delmar Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 44. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Folta, ABR–201010044, Tuscarora Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 45. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad ID: 05 097 Hartnett, ABR–201010045, Warren Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 6.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 46. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad ID: 05 015 Warner, ABR–201010046, Stevens Township and Pike Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 6.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 47. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State 842, ABR–201010047, Elk Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010, including a partial waiver of 18 CFR 806.15. 48. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State 843, ABR–201010048, Elk Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010, including a partial waiver of 18 CFR 806.15. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Nov 19, 2010 Jkt 223001 49. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Gemm, ABR–201010049, Litchfield Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 50. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Phillips, ABR–201010050, Elkland Township, Sullivan County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 51. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Grant, ABR–201010051, Smithfield Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010. 52. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Schimmel 828, ABR– 201010052, Farmington Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 53. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Parsons 613, ABR–201010053, Delmar Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 54. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Signor 566, ABR–201010054, Charleston Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010. 55. East Resources Management, LLC, Pad ID: Smithgall 293, ABR–201010055, Charleston Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010. 56. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Tall Maples, ABR–201010056, Elkland Township, Sullivan County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010. 57. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Tama, ABR–201010057, North Towanda Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010. 58. EQT Production Co., Pad ID: Phoenix H, ABR–201010058, Morris Township, Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 3.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010. 59. Williams Production Appalachia LLC, Pad ID: Resource Recovery Well Pad 1, ABR–201010059, Snow Shoe Township, Centre County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 21, 2010. 60. Williams Production Appalachia LLC, Pad ID: Resource Recovery Well Pad 3, ABR–201010060, Snow Shoe Township, Centre County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 21, 2010. 61. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Abel, ABR–201010062, Shrewsbury Township, Sullivan County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 25, 2010. PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71179 62. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad ID: 05 031 Smolko, ABR–201010063, Pike Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 6.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 27, 2010. 63. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Shores, ABR–201010064, Sheshequin Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 27, 2010. 64. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Juser, ABR–201010065, Rush Township, Susquehanna County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010. 65. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad ID: Drake, ABR–201010066, Litchfield Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 28, 2010. 66. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID: Smith Drilling Pad #1, ABR–201010067, Franklin Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 2.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010. 67. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID: B & B Investment Group Drilling Pad #1, ABR–201010068, Asylum Township, Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 2.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010. 68. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID: Boileau Drilling Pad #1, ABR– 201010069, Goshen Township, Clearfield County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 2.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010. 69. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID: PA Tract 8546H, ABR–201010070, Chapman Township, Clinton County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010. Authority: Pub L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR Parts 806, 807, and 808. Dated: November 10, 2010. Stephanie L. Richardson, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–29331 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7040–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Environmental Impact Statement: San Diego County, CA Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of intent. AGENCY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 71180 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices for a proposed highway project in San Diego County, California. DATES: Public Scoping Meeting: January 12, 2011; 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. ADDRESSES: Sherman Heights Community Center, 2258 Island Avenue, San Diego, California 92102. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Hovey, Environmental Analysis Branch Chief, California Department of Transportation, District 11— Environmental Division, MS 242, 4050 Taylor Street, San Diego, CA 92110, Regular Office Hours 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Telephone number 619–688–0240, email Kevin.Hovey@dot.ca.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned, and Caltrans assumed environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency will prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on a proposal for a highway project in San Diego County, California. The project is approximately three miles in length and its project limits are post miles (PM) 1.4 to 4.4 along SR–94, PM 12.95 to 13.51 along Interstate 805 (I–805), and PM R0.655 to R3.4 along State Route 15 (SR–15). The proposed action includes the addition of two dedicated HOV/BRT lanes and, depending on the alternative, the following additional improvements: Relocating left-hand connectors; constructing new interchanges and improvements along the existing connectors; removal, replacement, and relocation of bridge overcrossings; and drainage modifications within the project corridor. Retaining/Sound walls would also be added and new right-ofway (ROW) would be required. Two build alternatives and one no build alternatives are under consideration. The No Build Alternative assumes that no improvements would be made along the SR–94 project corridor and that conditions would remain the same. No HOV/BRT lanes would be constructed, and no other freeway improvements would be made. Maintaining existing conditions would not manage the available capacity on SR–94 and would not facilitate the use of HOV/BRT. Alternative 1 would provide a HOV/ BRT lane in each direction of SR–94 between I–5 and I–805. These lanes would be constructed in the median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I–805 in the northwest and east-south directions and at SR–15 in the south-west and east-north directions. This alternative would VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Nov 19, 2010 Jkt 223001 remove the left hand branch connectors at the SR–94/SR–15 interchange and replace them with right hand branch connectors. The estimated capital cost of this alternative is 465 million dollars. Alternative 2 would provide a HOV/ BRT lane in each direction on SR–94 between I–5 and I–805. These lanes would be constructed in the median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I–805 in the northwest and east-south directions, and at I– 15 in the south-west and east-north directions. The I–805/SR–94 HOV/BRT connector would stay elevated over SR– 15 and 32nd Street and touchdown west of 30th Street. The existing left hand branch connectors at SR–15 would be left in place. The estimated capital cost of this alternative is 452 million dollars. This project will be subject to the Section 6002 Environmental Review process and potential final approvals for the proposed project include, but are not limited to, consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act; conformance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; conformance with Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966; conformance under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; and conformance of the Clean Air Act. Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will be sent to appropriate Federal, State, Participating Agencies, and local agencies, and to private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are known to have interest in this proposal. A public scoping meeting will be held at the Sherman Heights Community Center in San Diego, California on January 12, 2011 from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. In addition, a public hearing will be held. Public notice will be given of the time and place of the meeting and hearing. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be available for public and agency review and comment prior to the public hearing. To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments, and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be directed to Caltrans at the address provided above. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 Issued on: November 16, 2010. Cindy Vigue, Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. 2010–29338 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Rescinding the Notice of Intent for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS): Harrison and Stone Counties, MS Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. AGENCY: Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS. ACTION: This notice rescinds the Notice of Intent for preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for proposed highway, State Route 601, to provide a connection between Interstate 10 at the Canal Road Interchange and State Route 26 in the City of Wiggins, Harrison and Stone Counties, Mississippi. The original Notice of Intent for this EIS process was published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2005. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claiborne Barnwell, Project Development Team Leader, Federal Highway Administration, Mississippi Division, 100 West Capitol Street, Suite 1026, Jackson, Mississippi 39269, Telephone: (601) 965–4217. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in cooperation with the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) initiated an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with a Notice of Intent August 12, 2005, to provide a connector road, to be built to interstate standards, between Interstate 10 and State Route 26. Due to funding constraints the Notice of Intent is rescinded. Andrew H. Hughes, Division Administrator, Mississippi, Federal Highway Administration, Jackson, Mississippi. [FR Doc. 2010–29141 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE M E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71179-71180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29338]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: San Diego County, CA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public 
that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared

[[Page 71180]]

for a proposed highway project in San Diego County, California.

DATES: Public Scoping Meeting: January 12, 2011; 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Sherman Heights Community Center, 2258 Island Avenue, San 
Diego, California 92102.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Hovey, Environmental Analysis 
Branch Chief, California Department of Transportation, District 11--
Environmental Division, MS 242, 4050 Taylor Street, San Diego, CA 
92110, Regular Office Hours 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Telephone number 619-688-
0240, e-mail Kevin.Hovey@dot.ca.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and Caltrans assumed environmental 
responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans 
as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency will 
prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on a proposal for a 
highway project in San Diego County, California.
    The project is approximately three miles in length and its project 
limits are post miles (PM) 1.4 to 4.4 along SR-94, PM 12.95 to 13.51 
along Interstate 805 (I-805), and PM R0.655 to R3.4 along State Route 
15 (SR-15). The proposed action includes the addition of two dedicated 
HOV/BRT lanes and, depending on the alternative, the following 
additional improvements: Relocating left-hand connectors; constructing 
new interchanges and improvements along the existing connectors; 
removal, replacement, and relocation of bridge overcrossings; and 
drainage modifications within the project corridor. Retaining/Sound 
walls would also be added and new right-of-way (ROW) would be required.
    Two build alternatives and one no build alternatives are under 
consideration. The No Build Alternative assumes that no improvements 
would be made along the SR-94 project corridor and that conditions 
would remain the same. No HOV/BRT lanes would be constructed, and no 
other freeway improvements would be made. Maintaining existing 
conditions would not manage the available capacity on SR-94 and would 
not facilitate the use of HOV/BRT.
    Alternative 1 would provide a HOV/BRT lane in each direction of SR-
94 between I-5 and I-805. These lanes would be constructed in the 
median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I-
805 in the north-west and east-south directions and at SR-15 in the 
south-west and east-north directions. This alternative would remove the 
left hand branch connectors at the SR-94/SR-15 interchange and replace 
them with right hand branch connectors. The estimated capital cost of 
this alternative is 465 million dollars.
    Alternative 2 would provide a HOV/BRT lane in each direction on SR-
94 between I-5 and I-805. These lanes would be constructed in the 
median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I-
805 in the north-west and east-south directions, and at I-15 in the 
south-west and east-north directions. The I-805/SR-94 HOV/BRT connector 
would stay elevated over SR-15 and 32nd Street and touchdown west of 
30th Street. The existing left hand branch connectors at SR-15 would be 
left in place. The estimated capital cost of this alternative is 452 
million dollars.
    This project will be subject to the Section 6002 Environmental 
Review process and potential final approvals for the proposed project 
include, but are not limited to, consultation with the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act; 
conformance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; conformance with 
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966; 
conformance under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation 
Act; and conformance of the Clean Air Act.
    Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will 
be sent to appropriate Federal, State, Participating Agencies, and 
local agencies, and to private organizations and citizens who have 
previously expressed or are known to have interest in this proposal. A 
public scoping meeting will be held at the Sherman Heights Community 
Center in San Diego, California on January 12, 2011 from 5 p.m. to 8 
p.m. In addition, a public hearing will be held. Public notice will be 
given of the time and place of the meeting and hearing. The Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement will be available for public and agency 
review and comment prior to the public hearing.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments, 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to Caltrans at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: November 16, 2010.
Cindy Vigue,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, 
California.
[FR Doc. 2010-29338 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P