Environmental Impact Statement: San Diego County, CA, 71179-71180 [2010-29338]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
37. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State
820, ABR–201010037, Gaines
Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.990 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010,
including a partial waiver of 18 CFR
806.15.
38. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State
818, ABR–201010038, Elk Township,
Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of
up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010, including a partial
waiver of 18 CFR 806.15.
39. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State
816, ABR–201010039, Elk Township,
Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of
up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010, including a partial
waiver of 18 CFR 806.15.
40. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Westbrook 487, ABR–
201010040, Richmond Township, Tioga
County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to
4.000 mgd; Approval Date: October 19,
2010.
41. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Berguson 622, ABR–201010041,
Covington Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
42. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Zimmer 586, ABR–201010042,
Covington Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
43. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Stevens 413, ABR–201010043,
Delmar Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
44. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Folta, ABR–201010044, Tuscarora
Township, Bradford County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
45. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad
ID: 05 097 Hartnett, ABR–201010045,
Warren Township, Bradford County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 6.000
mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
46. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad
ID: 05 015 Warner, ABR–201010046,
Stevens Township and Pike Township,
Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use
of up to 6.000 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010.
47. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State
842, ABR–201010047, Elk Township,
Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of
up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010, including a partial
waiver of 18 CFR 806.15.
48. Ultra Resources, Inc., Pad ID: State
843, ABR–201010048, Elk Township,
Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of
up to 4.990 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010, including a partial
waiver of 18 CFR 806.15.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
49. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Gemm, ABR–201010049, Litchfield
Township, Bradford County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
50. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Phillips, ABR–201010050, Elkland
Township, Sullivan County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
51. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Grant, ABR–201010051, Smithfield
Township, Bradford County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 20, 2010.
52. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Schimmel 828, ABR–
201010052, Farmington Township,
Tioga County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of
up to 4.000 mgd; Approval Date:
October 19, 2010.
53. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Parsons 613, ABR–201010053,
Delmar Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
54. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Signor 566, ABR–201010054,
Charleston Township, Tioga County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000
mgd; Approval Date: October 19, 2010.
55. East Resources Management, LLC,
Pad ID: Smithgall 293, ABR–201010055,
Charleston Township, Tioga County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000
mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010.
56. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Tall Maples, ABR–201010056,
Elkland Township, Sullivan County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500
mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010.
57. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Tama, ABR–201010057, North
Towanda Township, Bradford County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 7.500
mgd; Approval Date: October 20, 2010.
58. EQT Production Co., Pad ID:
Phoenix H, ABR–201010058, Morris
Township, Tioga County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 3.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 20, 2010.
59. Williams Production Appalachia
LLC, Pad ID: Resource Recovery Well
Pad 1, ABR–201010059, Snow Shoe
Township, Centre County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 21, 2010.
60. Williams Production Appalachia
LLC, Pad ID: Resource Recovery Well
Pad 3, ABR–201010060, Snow Shoe
Township, Centre County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 4.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 21, 2010.
61. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Abel, ABR–201010062, Shrewsbury
Township, Sullivan County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 25, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71179
62. Talisman Energy USA Inc., Pad
ID: 05 031 Smolko, ABR–201010063,
Pike Township, Bradford County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 6.000 mgd;
Approval Date: October 27, 2010.
63. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Shores, ABR–201010064,
Sheshequin Township, Bradford
County, Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to
7.500 mgd; Approval Date: October 27,
2010.
64. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Juser, ABR–201010065, Rush
Township, Susquehanna County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 29, 2010.
65. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Pad
ID: Drake, ABR–201010066, Litchfield
Township, Bradford County, Pa.;
Consumptive Use of up to 7.500 mgd;
Approval Date: October 28, 2010.
66. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID:
Smith Drilling Pad #1, ABR–201010067,
Franklin Township, Bradford County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 2.000
mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010.
67. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID: B &
B Investment Group Drilling Pad #1,
ABR–201010068, Asylum Township,
Bradford County, Pa.; Consumptive Use
of up to 2.000 mgd; Approval Date:
October 29, 2010.
68. Chief Oil & Gas LLC, Pad ID:
Boileau Drilling Pad #1, ABR–
201010069, Goshen Township,
Clearfield County, Pa.; Consumptive
Use of up to 2.000 mgd; Approval Date:
October 29, 2010.
69. XTO Energy Incorporated, Pad ID:
PA Tract 8546H, ABR–201010070,
Chapman Township, Clinton County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 4.000
mgd; Approval Date: October 29, 2010.
Authority: Pub L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et
seq., 18 CFR Parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–29331 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: San
Diego County, CA
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The FHWA, on behalf of the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to
advise the public that an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
71180
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices
for a proposed highway project in San
Diego County, California.
DATES: Public Scoping Meeting: January
12, 2011; 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Sherman Heights
Community Center, 2258 Island
Avenue, San Diego, California 92102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Hovey, Environmental Analysis
Branch Chief, California Department of
Transportation, District 11—
Environmental Division, MS 242, 4050
Taylor Street, San Diego, CA 92110,
Regular Office Hours 7 a.m. to 3 p.m.,
Telephone number 619–688–0240, email Kevin.Hovey@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
Caltrans assumed environmental
responsibilities for this project pursuant
to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans as the
delegated National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) agency will prepare
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
on a proposal for a highway project in
San Diego County, California.
The project is approximately three
miles in length and its project limits are
post miles (PM) 1.4 to 4.4 along SR–94,
PM 12.95 to 13.51 along Interstate 805
(I–805), and PM R0.655 to R3.4 along
State Route 15 (SR–15). The proposed
action includes the addition of two
dedicated HOV/BRT lanes and,
depending on the alternative, the
following additional improvements:
Relocating left-hand connectors;
constructing new interchanges and
improvements along the existing
connectors; removal, replacement, and
relocation of bridge overcrossings; and
drainage modifications within the
project corridor. Retaining/Sound walls
would also be added and new right-ofway (ROW) would be required.
Two build alternatives and one no
build alternatives are under
consideration. The No Build Alternative
assumes that no improvements would
be made along the SR–94 project
corridor and that conditions would
remain the same. No HOV/BRT lanes
would be constructed, and no other
freeway improvements would be made.
Maintaining existing conditions would
not manage the available capacity on
SR–94 and would not facilitate the use
of HOV/BRT.
Alternative 1 would provide a HOV/
BRT lane in each direction of SR–94
between I–5 and I–805. These lanes
would be constructed in the median of
SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include
direct connectors at I–805 in the northwest and east-south directions and at
SR–15 in the south-west and east-north
directions. This alternative would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Nov 19, 2010
Jkt 223001
remove the left hand branch connectors
at the SR–94/SR–15 interchange and
replace them with right hand branch
connectors. The estimated capital cost
of this alternative is 465 million dollars.
Alternative 2 would provide a HOV/
BRT lane in each direction on SR–94
between I–5 and I–805. These lanes
would be constructed in the median of
SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include
direct connectors at I–805 in the northwest and east-south directions, and at I–
15 in the south-west and east-north
directions. The I–805/SR–94 HOV/BRT
connector would stay elevated over SR–
15 and 32nd Street and touchdown west
of 30th Street. The existing left hand
branch connectors at SR–15 would be
left in place. The estimated capital cost
of this alternative is 452 million dollars.
This project will be subject to the
Section 6002 Environmental Review
process and potential final approvals for
the proposed project include, but are
not limited to, consultation with the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under
Section 7 of the Federal Endangered
Species Act; conformance with Section
404 of the Clean Water Act;
conformance with Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966; conformance under Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act;
and conformance of the Clean Air Act.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, Participating
Agencies, and local agencies, and to
private organizations and citizens who
have previously expressed or are known
to have interest in this proposal. A
public scoping meeting will be held at
the Sherman Heights Community Center
in San Diego, California on January 12,
2011 from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. In addition,
a public hearing will be held. Public
notice will be given of the time and
place of the meeting and hearing. The
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
will be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the public
hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments, and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Issued on: November 16, 2010.
Cindy Vigue,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway
Administration, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2010–29338 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Rescinding the Notice of Intent for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS):
Harrison and Stone Counties, MS
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Rescind Notice of Intent to
prepare an EIS.
ACTION:
This notice rescinds the
Notice of Intent for preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for proposed highway, State Route 601,
to provide a connection between
Interstate 10 at the Canal Road
Interchange and State Route 26 in the
City of Wiggins, Harrison and Stone
Counties, Mississippi. The original
Notice of Intent for this EIS process was
published in the Federal Register on
August 12, 2005.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claiborne Barnwell, Project
Development Team Leader, Federal
Highway Administration, Mississippi
Division, 100 West Capitol Street, Suite
1026, Jackson, Mississippi 39269,
Telephone: (601) 965–4217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) in cooperation with the
Mississippi Department of
Transportation (MDOT) initiated an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
with a Notice of Intent August 12, 2005,
to provide a connector road, to be built
to interstate standards, between
Interstate 10 and State Route 26.
Due to funding constraints the Notice
of Intent is rescinded.
Andrew H. Hughes,
Division Administrator, Mississippi, Federal
Highway Administration, Jackson,
Mississippi.
[FR Doc. 2010–29141 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71179-71180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29338]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: San Diego County, CA
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public
that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared
[[Page 71180]]
for a proposed highway project in San Diego County, California.
DATES: Public Scoping Meeting: January 12, 2011; 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Sherman Heights Community Center, 2258 Island Avenue, San
Diego, California 92102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Hovey, Environmental Analysis
Branch Chief, California Department of Transportation, District 11--
Environmental Division, MS 242, 4050 Taylor Street, San Diego, CA
92110, Regular Office Hours 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Telephone number 619-688-
0240, e-mail Kevin.Hovey@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and Caltrans assumed environmental
responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans
as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency will
prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on a proposal for a
highway project in San Diego County, California.
The project is approximately three miles in length and its project
limits are post miles (PM) 1.4 to 4.4 along SR-94, PM 12.95 to 13.51
along Interstate 805 (I-805), and PM R0.655 to R3.4 along State Route
15 (SR-15). The proposed action includes the addition of two dedicated
HOV/BRT lanes and, depending on the alternative, the following
additional improvements: Relocating left-hand connectors; constructing
new interchanges and improvements along the existing connectors;
removal, replacement, and relocation of bridge overcrossings; and
drainage modifications within the project corridor. Retaining/Sound
walls would also be added and new right-of-way (ROW) would be required.
Two build alternatives and one no build alternatives are under
consideration. The No Build Alternative assumes that no improvements
would be made along the SR-94 project corridor and that conditions
would remain the same. No HOV/BRT lanes would be constructed, and no
other freeway improvements would be made. Maintaining existing
conditions would not manage the available capacity on SR-94 and would
not facilitate the use of HOV/BRT.
Alternative 1 would provide a HOV/BRT lane in each direction of SR-
94 between I-5 and I-805. These lanes would be constructed in the
median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I-
805 in the north-west and east-south directions and at SR-15 in the
south-west and east-north directions. This alternative would remove the
left hand branch connectors at the SR-94/SR-15 interchange and replace
them with right hand branch connectors. The estimated capital cost of
this alternative is 465 million dollars.
Alternative 2 would provide a HOV/BRT lane in each direction on SR-
94 between I-5 and I-805. These lanes would be constructed in the
median of SR 94. The HOV/BRT lanes also include direct connectors at I-
805 in the north-west and east-south directions, and at I-15 in the
south-west and east-north directions. The I-805/SR-94 HOV/BRT connector
would stay elevated over SR-15 and 32nd Street and touchdown west of
30th Street. The existing left hand branch connectors at SR-15 would be
left in place. The estimated capital cost of this alternative is 452
million dollars.
This project will be subject to the Section 6002 Environmental
Review process and potential final approvals for the proposed project
include, but are not limited to, consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act;
conformance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; conformance with
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966;
conformance under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act; and conformance of the Clean Air Act.
Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will
be sent to appropriate Federal, State, Participating Agencies, and
local agencies, and to private organizations and citizens who have
previously expressed or are known to have interest in this proposal. A
public scoping meeting will be held at the Sherman Heights Community
Center in San Diego, California on January 12, 2011 from 5 p.m. to 8
p.m. In addition, a public hearing will be held. Public notice will be
given of the time and place of the meeting and hearing. The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the public hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments,
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Issued on: November 16, 2010.
Cindy Vigue,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2010-29338 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P