Transit Asset Management (TAM) Pilot Program, 70966-70969 [2010-29176]
Download as PDF
70966
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2010 / Notices
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
or to the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keira Jones, 202–267–4025, or Tyneka
L. Thomas, 202–267–7626, Office of
Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
This notice is published pursuant to
14 CFR 11.85.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
16, 2010.
Dennis Pratte,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
Petition For Exemption
Docket No.: FAA–2010–0947 and
FAA–2010–0970.
Petitioner: Seaborne Virgin Islands,
Inc. d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines.
Section of 14 CFR Affected: Part 121,
Appendix K, Paragraph 5(a)
Description of Relief Sought:
Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc. d.b.a.
Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne) petitioned
for exemption from certain aircraft
performance requirements in part 121,
Appendix K, Paragraph 5(a) that are
effective on and after December 20,
2010, that pertain to the operations of
Seaborne’s DHC–6–300 airplanes (float
and wheel equipped).
[FR Doc. 2010–29196 Filed 11–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Transit Asset Management (TAM) Pilot
Program
Federal Transit Administration,
United States Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Request for Proposals (RFP).
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) is soliciting
proposals from public transportation
providers, state Departments of
Transportation (DOT), and Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (MPO)—
individually or in partnership—to
demonstrate effective Transit Asset
Management (TAM) systems and ‘‘best
practices’’, which can be replicated to
improve transportation asset
management at the nation’s rail and bus
public transportation agencies. Public
sector applicants may partner with asset
management system suppliers; however
the official proposer must be a public
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
agency. The TAM pilot program is
intended to address several public
transportation asset management
challenges identified in previous
research by FTA.1 FTA contemplates
making multiple cooperative agreement
awards for TAM pilot projects to varied
teams.
The total available funding for the
TAM pilot program is $3 million. FTA
will award cooperative agreements, up
to $1 million each, to successful
proposers for pilot projects that will
demonstrate certain aspects of TAM
systems. Successful TAM pilot projects
will promote the use of advanced tools
and practices throughout the public
transportation industry. FTA is looking
for innovative approaches to asset
management using proven technology
that will enhance the ability of public
transportation providers, MPOs, and
state DOTs to maintain their assets in a
state of good repair and/or make more
informed resource allocation decisions.
Proposed solutions must be scalable and
transferable such that they can be
adapted by public transportation
agencies and organizations of various
sizes and modes. Additionally, FTA
seeks to provide technical assistance to
public transportation agencies through
written reports and technical knowledge
to be provided under the cooperative
agreements.
Proposals must be submitted
electronically by January 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Proposals shall be
submitted electronically to
https://www.grants.gov. The Web site
allows organizations to find and apply
for funding opportunities electronically
from all Federal grant-making agencies
and is the single access point for over
1,000 cooperative agreement programs
offered by the 26 Federal grant-making
agencies.
Mail and fax submissions will not be
accepted (excluding supplemental
information which cannot be sent
electronically).
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Aaron C. James, Director, Office
of Engineering, (202) 493–0107,
aaron.james@dot.gov for proposalspecific information and issues.
I. Funding Authority
The FY 2010 DOT–HUD
appropriations bill provides significant
resources to FTA to encourage improved
management of the condition and
recapitalization of the Nation’s transit
1 National State of Good Repair Assessment, June
2010 and Transit Asset Management Practices—A
National and International Review, July 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
infrastructure. Specifically, the bill
states:
‘‘Asset Management—The conference
agreement includes $5,000,000 to develop
asset management plans, technical
assistance, data collection and a pilot
program as proposed by the Senate. The
House did not include similar language. The
conferees expect the pilot program to include
transit agencies that vary in size and direct
FTA to report findings to the House and
Senate Committees on appropriations within
18 months of enactment.’’
FTA is using a portion of this research
funding, authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5312,
to support research in asset management
practices and condition assessment
methodologies, as well as new data
collection and analysis activities. $3
million has been reserved for the pilot
projects being solicited in this RFP.
II. Background and Objectives
FTA is one of eleven agencies in the
Department of Transportation (DOT)
and has the primary responsibility of
carrying out the Federal mandate of
promoting and improving the nation’s
public transportation system. As part of
its role, FTA provides over $10 billion
annually in financial assistance to
transit agencies and states for building
and maintaining public transportation
systems. There is growing concern that
a significant portion of the nation’s
public transportation assets are in need
of capital reinvestment due to the
historically inadequate level of financial
resources available for maintenance and
asset replacement activities and/or an
inability by agencies to set appropriate
recapitalization priorities due to a lack
of effective and easily adopted asset
condition assessment tools and systems.
The National State of Good Repair
Assessment, published by FTA in June
2010, indicated that roughly one-third
of the nation’s public transit assets
(weighted by replacement value) are in
marginal or poor condition and that
almost $80 billion is needed to bring
them into a ‘‘state of good repair.’’ It has
been widely acknowledged that asset
management practices in the public
transportation sector have not received
the same level of technical advancement
or attention as have those used for the
nation’s highways and public utilities.
FTA commissioned a review of ‘‘Transit
Asset Management Practices—National
and International’’ and posted this
report to its Web site in July 2010. The
review found that while several transit
agencies are utilizing TAM systems of
one form or another, there are many
transit agencies without a system in
place for managing the condition of
their capital assets in a holistic manner.
Effective TAM systems use quality data
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2010 / Notices
70967
public transportation industry as a
whole, FTA is looking to partner with
transit agencies, state DOTs, MPOs, and
asset management system suppliers to
demonstrate innovative approaches for
managing transportation assets from the
initial capital asset acquisition planning
phase to the asset recapitalization
phase.
Referring to the diagram below, this
TAM pilot program is aimed at
demonstrating solutions to asset
management challenges in each of the
four phases of the asset management
cycle, as well as improvements to the
overall asset management flow and
approach.
FTA intends to disseminate
innovative and/or improved asset
management methods developed as part
of this pilot program to the industry-atlarge so that public transportation
agencies, state DOTs and MPOs can
prioritize their transit asset repair,
recapitalization and replacement needs,
and develop reasonable cost/schedule
estimates for achieving a ‘‘state of good
repair’’. Asset management tools that
will promote better management of
safety-related public transportation
capital assets will be of particular
interest.
FTA will participate in TAM pilot
program activities at the project level by
attending review meetings, commenting
on technical reports, and maintaining
frequent contact with the project
manager. FTA subject matter experts
(staff or contractors) will also be
included in the project evaluations.
Proposers will be required to assist
FTA in reporting the TAM pilot
program’s progress to Congress, as
necessary.
IV. Eligibility
A strong preference for software
products that promote data
interoperability between diverse types
of information technology systems
through use of open data formats and
standard data communication protocols
is desired by FTA.]
6. Transit asset management systems
and solutions proposed must have a
high probability of being successfully
implemented in lieu of newer, high-risk
or experimental proposals involving
unproven systems.
7. Must be completed within 18
months or less.
8. Must result in asset management
tools and practices that can be
implemented at reasonable cost other
agencies of varying sizes and modal
composition. More expensive tools or
practices can be identified but should be
in addition to cost effective solutions, if
proposed.
9. Must provide for data compatibility
and data transfer with other transit
management systems (e.g. maintenance
management, financial management,
etc.).
III. Schedule
The successful proposers will be
announced in late February 2011 with
an anticipated Notice to Proceed (NTP)
in early March, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
All proposals must meet the following
minimum requirements to be eligible for
further consideration of a cooperative
agreement award:
1. All proposing entities and/or teams
must provide written certification that
they have existing TAM systems and
practices currently in use and are
willing to provide a system
demonstration.
2. New systems and solutions, if
proposed, must be a recent evolution of
an existing system in use.
3. Proposing entities and/or teams
must already possess the technical
capacity and capability to complete the
TAM project.
4. Asset management system
suppliers must have currently available
commercial products to qualify as an
asset management system supplier;
however products proposed do not
necessarily have to be commercially
available at the time of the proposal
submission but must be a recent
evolution of a currently available
commercial product if new.
5. Any proposed software system
must explicitly state what data formats
and communication protocols are
supported ‘‘off the shelf’’ and whether or
not they are proprietary in nature. [Note:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
V. Proposal Requirements
A. Submission Process
Proposals shall be submitted
electronically to https://www.grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
EN19NO10.000
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
and well-defined objectives as part of a
systematic process to strategically
maintain, and improve, capital assets,
resulting in the optimal allocation and
utilization of available funding.
To help increase the number of transit
agencies with complete and up-to-date
capital asset inventories and improve
the level of asset management in the
70968
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Mailed and faxed submissions will not
be accepted (except for supplemental
information that cannot be sent
electronically).
Please deliver supplemental materials
to Doris Lyons, Office of Program
Management,
Doris.Lyonsmailto:@dot.gov, Federal
Transit Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Room E46–204,
Washington, DC 20590.
B. Projects Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated on the
basis of their implementation of the
following major functionalities.
Proposals should specifically address
one or more of the following functions
and clearly state the function(s) for
which a solution is being proposed.
1. Demonstrate innovative approaches
to public transportation systems
planning at the state DOT or MPO level
that incorporates the long-term costs of
maintaining the systems in a state of
good repair (SGR) including:
a. Ensuring agency policy goals and
objectives are aligned with an approach
focused on achieving and maintaining a
state of good repair.
b. Setting comprehensive policy
intended to minimize life-cycle costs
and maximize asset serviceability.
c. Implementing an asset management
system as part of a strategic plan for
managing assets from cradle to grave,
including initial funding and financing
scenarios.
2. Provide a transit capital asset
inventory database with sufficient
capacity and functionality to track all
categories of public transportation
capital assets combined:
a. Specifying data items and protocol,
for each asset,
b. Specifying data collection methods,
and
c. Tracking complex assets, such as
vehicles, facilities, and structures, at the
system component and major
subcomponents level.
3. Demonstrate proven asset
inspection methods including frequency
and general criteria for identifying
deficiencies, taking into account other
industry practices (e.g. use of state
highway bridge inspection procedures
on elevated structures) that can be
effectively applied throughout the
public transportation industry, for:
a. Assessing the physical condition of
all asset categories, especially those
providing a safety critical function,
b. Providing a comprehensive set of
performance measures for rating asset
condition at the system component level
(e.g. vehicles, facilities, stations, etc.)
and major subcomponents level (e.g.
escalators, elevators, etc.).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
c. Performing and tracking required
maintenance for all asset inventory
categories.
4. Provide methodologies to better
prioritize reinvestment needs including:
a. Life-cycle planning of long-lived
assets such as maintenance facilities,
systems infrastructure and underground
structures.
b. Innovative ways to evaluate the
effects of capital reinvestment decisions
on system performance in terms of
capacity, safety, reliability,
maintainability, and operating costs.
c. Risk-based approaches that factor in
the risks associated with deteriorating
asset conditions as opposed to just
relying on an asset’s age to set
recapitalization priorities.
d. The ability to perform scenario
analysis involving both constrained and
unconstrained needs, as well as the
ability to project the optimal
distribution of work given likely
funding levels along with estimated
impacts associated with deferred
maintenance.
5. Simplify and improve the integrity
of asset condition data collection
through the use of technology and
process re-engineering.
For purposes of this TAM pilot
program, FTA is primarily interested in
pursuing the TAM projects described
above however, other TAM projects may
be proposed as long as they are
consistent with FTA’s stated objectives
in Section II and they meet the
eligibility requirements in Section IV.
Upon completion of FTA’s proposal
review, evaluation, scoring and ranking
process, FTA reserves the right to
negotiate cooperative agreement awards
for entire proposal offerings or specific
portions of proposals.
C. Proposal Content
Proposals shall be limited to 60 pages
in total length and shall contain the
following:
1. Cover sheet (1 page)—Includes the
entity submitting the proposal, the
principal investigator’s name, title, and
contact information (e.g. address,
phone, fax, and e-mail). Name and
contact information for the entity’s key
point(s) of contact for all cooperative
activities (if different from the principle
investigator).
2. Abstract (2 pages)—Abstract shall
include project background, purpose,
demonstration methodology, intended
outcomes, and method of measuring
how successful the project has been in
achieving the intended outcomes.
3. Statement of Eligibility—The
eligibility requirements (as listed in
Section IV above) should be addressed
in narrative form and include a ‘‘waiver
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
letter’’ stating FTA will have
unrestricted rights to use data outputs
generated.
4. Project narrative (not to exceed 30
pages)—Project narrative shall include
the following information:
a. Project Understanding and TAM
approach—Understanding of FTA’s
goals and objectives the problem to be
addressed, beyond the description
provided by FTA in this RFP; and the
proposed approach for executing the
research project. Particular attention
should be given to describing how the
proposing entity will ensure that the
proposed TAM project will result in
beneficial systems and solutions that
can be readily implemented at other
agencies of varying sizes and modes.
b. Past Experience—Experience in
asset management implementation and
knowledge of public transportation
management issues related to asset
management.
c. Technical Capacity—Technical
experience and ability of the proposing
organization to address asset
management issues identified in this
RFP and the availability of key project
resources.
5. Preliminary Project Implementation
Plan that includes well defined
objectives, resources, tasks to
accomplish the objectives and a
schedule of activities with timelines,
and deliverables.
6. A Small Business (SB)
Subcontracting Plan detailing how small
businesses will be utilized as members
of the proposing team. Joint ventures
with Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
(DBE) firms (i.e., Small Business owned
and controlled by Minorities, Women or
Disabled Veterans) with requisite
experience are encouraged.
In addition to the required proposal
elements, proposers have the option to
submit supplemental material such as:
Brochures, publications, products,
letters of support etc. Such
supplemental materials, when
submitted in appendices, will not be
considered a part of the 60-page
proposal limit.
D. Deliverables
Successful proposers are not required
to deliver proprietary systems
information to FTA. The following are
required:
1. Monthly progress reports with a
narrative describing progress on key
milestone activities, monthly and
cumulative budget expenditures, SB and
DBE utilization, problems encountered
and work planned for the next month.
2. A detailed Project Implementation
Plan within 15 working days of
receiving a Notice to Proceed (NTP).
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 223 / Friday, November 19, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
3. Fifteen (15) bound copies
(including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of an
Interim Report presenting objectives,
approach, interim findings and
recommendations along with supporting
data by May 30, 2011.
4. A presentation of the Interim
Report, at FTA headquarters or via
webinar/conference call by June 6, 2011.
5. Fifteen (15) bound copies
(including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of a
Preliminary Report presenting
objectives, approach, preliminary
findings, and recommendations,
supporting data, and comments from
FTA on the Interim Report, no later than
4 months after completion of Interim
Report.
6. A presentation of the Preliminary
Report, at FTA headquarters or via
webinar/conference call within two
weeks of submission of Preliminary
Report.
7. Fifteen (15) bound copies
(including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of a Final
Report, addressing preliminary report
findings and FTA comments, no later
than 16 months after NTP.
8. A presentation of the Final Report
at FTA headquarters or via webinar/
conference call within two weeks of
submission of the Final Report.
9. Forty (40) hours of technical
assistance by suitable staff to participate
in information exchange forums such as
webinars, meetings, teleconferences, or
workshops to explain TAM solution.
10. TAM software methodology,
solutions and non proprietary TAM
systems information with appropriate
level of documentation and
recommended practice(s) in a medium
compatible with FTA software
system(s).
Proposers should plan on providing at
least one of the three presentations
required above, in person to FTA at its
headquarters in Washington, DC. FTA
will make every effort to accommodate
webinars or conference calls for the
other two presentations.
Other deliverables, if applicable, will
be negotiated prior to award of the
cooperative agreement(s). Electronic
copies of all deliverables must be
provided in PDF format and in
Microsoft Office.
VI. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated based on
the following criteria and scoring
system:
1. Project understanding and
approach. (25%)
2. Technical capacity. (20%)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:02 Nov 18, 2010
Jkt 223001
3. Product superiority based on the
degree to which all eligibility
requirements are met or exceeded,
including software products that
promote data interoperability. (30%).
4. Preliminary Project Implementation
Plan. (15%)
5. Small Business Subcontracting Plan
detailing how small businesses will be
utilized as members of the proposing
team. (10%)
After technical proposals have been
evaluated, scored and ranked according
to overall value, FTA will enter into
negotiations with the entities that
submitted the highest ranked proposals
to set the cooperative agreement project
scope and cost.
VII. Award Administration
Following receipt of the FTA
Administrator’s notification letter, the
successful entity(ies) will be required to
submit its proposal through the FTA
Transportation Electronic Award
Management (TEAM) system. FTA will
manage the cooperative agreement(s)
through the TEAM system. Before FTA
may award Federal financial assistance
through a Federal cooperative
agreement, the entity must submit all
certifications and assurances pertaining
to itself and its project as required by
Federal laws and regulations. The Fiscal
Year 2011 Annual List of Certifications
and Assurances for FTA Cooperative
Agreements and Guidelines will be
published in the Federal Register and
posted on the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
VIII. Agency Contact
Contact Aaron C. James, Director,
Office of Engineering, (202) 493–0107,
aaron.james@dot.gov for proposalspecific information and issues.
Issued in Washington, DC this 15th day of
November 2010.
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–29176 Filed 11–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
November 12, 2010.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirement to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. A copy of
the submission may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
70969
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury PRA Clearance
Officer, Department of the Treasury,
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite
11010, Washington, DC 20220.
Dates: Written comments should be
received on or before December 20, 2010
to be assured of consideration.
Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)
OMB Number: 1535–0112.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Sale and Issue of Marketable
Book-Entry Treasury Bills, Notes and
Bonds.
Abstract: Information needed in order
to process tender and to ensure
compliance with Treasury Auction
Rules.
Respondents: Individuals and
Households.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1
hour.
OMB Number: 1535–0128.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form.
Form: PD F 5396.
Abstract: Used to process payment
data to the financial institution.
Respondents: Individuals and
Households.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 3,060
hours.
OMB Number: 1535–0069.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Treasury Direct Forms.
Forms: 5261, 5181, PD F 5189, PD F
5178, PD F 5179–1, PD F 5180, PD F
5381, PD F 5179, PD F 5182, PD F 5236,
PD F 5235, PD F 5188, PD F 5191.
Abstract: Used to purchase and
maintain Treasury Bills, Notes and
Bonds.
Respondents: Individuals and
Households.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 25,018
hours.
Bureau Clearance Officer: Bruce
Sharp, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200
Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia
26106; (304) 480–8112.
OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–7873.
Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–29151 Filed 11–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–39–P
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70966-70969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29176]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Transit Asset Management (TAM) Pilot Program
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Request for Proposals (RFP).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is soliciting
proposals from public transportation providers, state Departments of
Transportation (DOT), and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO)--
individually or in partnership--to demonstrate effective Transit Asset
Management (TAM) systems and ``best practices'', which can be
replicated to improve transportation asset management at the nation's
rail and bus public transportation agencies. Public sector applicants
may partner with asset management system suppliers; however the
official proposer must be a public agency. The TAM pilot program is
intended to address several public transportation asset management
challenges identified in previous research by FTA.\1\ FTA contemplates
making multiple cooperative agreement awards for TAM pilot projects to
varied teams.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ National State of Good Repair Assessment, June 2010 and
Transit Asset Management Practices--A National and International
Review, July 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total available funding for the TAM pilot program is $3
million. FTA will award cooperative agreements, up to $1 million each,
to successful proposers for pilot projects that will demonstrate
certain aspects of TAM systems. Successful TAM pilot projects will
promote the use of advanced tools and practices throughout the public
transportation industry. FTA is looking for innovative approaches to
asset management using proven technology that will enhance the ability
of public transportation providers, MPOs, and state DOTs to maintain
their assets in a state of good repair and/or make more informed
resource allocation decisions. Proposed solutions must be scalable and
transferable such that they can be adapted by public transportation
agencies and organizations of various sizes and modes. Additionally,
FTA seeks to provide technical assistance to public transportation
agencies through written reports and technical knowledge to be provided
under the cooperative agreements.
DATES: Proposals must be submitted electronically by January 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Proposals shall be submitted electronically to
http:[sol][sol]www.grants.gov. The Web site allows organizations to
find and apply for funding opportunities electronically from all
Federal grant-making agencies and is the single access point for over
1,000 cooperative agreement programs offered by the 26 Federal grant-
making agencies.
Mail and fax submissions will not be accepted (excluding
supplemental information which cannot be sent electronically).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Aaron C. James, Director,
Office of Engineering, (202) 493-0107, aaron.james@dot.gov for
proposal-specific information and issues.
I. Funding Authority
The FY 2010 DOT-HUD appropriations bill provides significant
resources to FTA to encourage improved management of the condition and
recapitalization of the Nation's transit infrastructure. Specifically,
the bill states:
``Asset Management--The conference agreement includes $5,000,000
to develop asset management plans, technical assistance, data
collection and a pilot program as proposed by the Senate. The House
did not include similar language. The conferees expect the pilot
program to include transit agencies that vary in size and direct FTA
to report findings to the House and Senate Committees on
appropriations within 18 months of enactment.''
FTA is using a portion of this research funding, authorized by 49
U.S.C. 5312, to support research in asset management practices and
condition assessment methodologies, as well as new data collection and
analysis activities. $3 million has been reserved for the pilot
projects being solicited in this RFP.
II. Background and Objectives
FTA is one of eleven agencies in the Department of Transportation
(DOT) and has the primary responsibility of carrying out the Federal
mandate of promoting and improving the nation's public transportation
system. As part of its role, FTA provides over $10 billion annually in
financial assistance to transit agencies and states for building and
maintaining public transportation systems. There is growing concern
that a significant portion of the nation's public transportation assets
are in need of capital reinvestment due to the historically inadequate
level of financial resources available for maintenance and asset
replacement activities and/or an inability by agencies to set
appropriate recapitalization priorities due to a lack of effective and
easily adopted asset condition assessment tools and systems.
The National State of Good Repair Assessment, published by FTA in
June 2010, indicated that roughly one-third of the nation's public
transit assets (weighted by replacement value) are in marginal or poor
condition and that almost $80 billion is needed to bring them into a
``state of good repair.'' It has been widely acknowledged that asset
management practices in the public transportation sector have not
received the same level of technical advancement or attention as have
those used for the nation's highways and public utilities. FTA
commissioned a review of ``Transit Asset Management Practices--National
and International'' and posted this report to its Web site in July
2010. The review found that while several transit agencies are
utilizing TAM systems of one form or another, there are many transit
agencies without a system in place for managing the condition of their
capital assets in a holistic manner. Effective TAM systems use quality
data
[[Page 70967]]
and well-defined objectives as part of a systematic process to
strategically maintain, and improve, capital assets, resulting in the
optimal allocation and utilization of available funding.
To help increase the number of transit agencies with complete and
up-to-date capital asset inventories and improve the level of asset
management in the public transportation industry as a whole, FTA is
looking to partner with transit agencies, state DOTs, MPOs, and asset
management system suppliers to demonstrate innovative approaches for
managing transportation assets from the initial capital asset
acquisition planning phase to the asset recapitalization phase.
Referring to the diagram below, this TAM pilot program is aimed at
demonstrating solutions to asset management challenges in each of the
four phases of the asset management cycle, as well as improvements to
the overall asset management flow and approach.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19NO10.000
FTA intends to disseminate innovative and/or improved asset
management methods developed as part of this pilot program to the
industry-at-large so that public transportation agencies, state DOTs
and MPOs can prioritize their transit asset repair, recapitalization
and replacement needs, and develop reasonable cost/schedule estimates
for achieving a ``state of good repair''. Asset management tools that
will promote better management of safety-related public transportation
capital assets will be of particular interest.
FTA will participate in TAM pilot program activities at the project
level by attending review meetings, commenting on technical reports,
and maintaining frequent contact with the project manager. FTA subject
matter experts (staff or contractors) will also be included in the
project evaluations.
Proposers will be required to assist FTA in reporting the TAM pilot
program's progress to Congress, as necessary.
III. Schedule
The successful proposers will be announced in late February 2011
with an anticipated Notice to Proceed (NTP) in early March, 2011.
IV. Eligibility
All proposals must meet the following minimum requirements to be
eligible for further consideration of a cooperative agreement award:
1. All proposing entities and/or teams must provide written
certification that they have existing TAM systems and practices
currently in use and are willing to provide a system demonstration.
2. New systems and solutions, if proposed, must be a recent
evolution of an existing system in use.
3. Proposing entities and/or teams must already possess the
technical capacity and capability to complete the TAM project.
4. Asset management system suppliers must have currently available
commercial products to qualify as an asset management system supplier;
however products proposed do not necessarily have to be commercially
available at the time of the proposal submission but must be a recent
evolution of a currently available commercial product if new.
5. Any proposed software system must explicitly state what data
formats and communication protocols are supported ``off the shelf'' and
whether or not they are proprietary in nature. [Note: A strong
preference for software products that promote data interoperability
between diverse types of information technology systems through use of
open data formats and standard data communication protocols is desired
by FTA.]
6. Transit asset management systems and solutions proposed must
have a high probability of being successfully implemented in lieu of
newer, high-risk or experimental proposals involving unproven systems.
7. Must be completed within 18 months or less.
8. Must result in asset management tools and practices that can be
implemented at reasonable cost other agencies of varying sizes and
modal composition. More expensive tools or practices can be identified
but should be in addition to cost effective solutions, if proposed.
9. Must provide for data compatibility and data transfer with other
transit management systems (e.g. maintenance management, financial
management, etc.).
V. Proposal Requirements
A. Submission Process
Proposals shall be submitted electronically to
http:[sol][sol]www.grants.gov.
[[Page 70968]]
Mailed and faxed submissions will not be accepted (except for
supplemental information that cannot be sent electronically).
Please deliver supplemental materials to Doris Lyons, Office of
Program Management, Doris.Lyonsmailto:@dot.gov, Federal Transit
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room E46-204, Washington,
DC 20590.
B. Projects Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of their implementation of
the following major functionalities. Proposals should specifically
address one or more of the following functions and clearly state the
function(s) for which a solution is being proposed.
1. Demonstrate innovative approaches to public transportation
systems planning at the state DOT or MPO level that incorporates the
long-term costs of maintaining the systems in a state of good repair
(SGR) including:
a. Ensuring agency policy goals and objectives are aligned with an
approach focused on achieving and maintaining a state of good repair.
b. Setting comprehensive policy intended to minimize life-cycle
costs and maximize asset serviceability.
c. Implementing an asset management system as part of a strategic
plan for managing assets from cradle to grave, including initial
funding and financing scenarios.
2. Provide a transit capital asset inventory database with
sufficient capacity and functionality to track all categories of public
transportation capital assets combined:
a. Specifying data items and protocol, for each asset,
b. Specifying data collection methods, and
c. Tracking complex assets, such as vehicles, facilities, and
structures, at the system component and major subcomponents level.
3. Demonstrate proven asset inspection methods including frequency
and general criteria for identifying deficiencies, taking into account
other industry practices (e.g. use of state highway bridge inspection
procedures on elevated structures) that can be effectively applied
throughout the public transportation industry, for:
a. Assessing the physical condition of all asset categories,
especially those providing a safety critical function,
b. Providing a comprehensive set of performance measures for rating
asset condition at the system component level (e.g. vehicles,
facilities, stations, etc.) and major subcomponents level (e.g.
escalators, elevators, etc.).
c. Performing and tracking required maintenance for all asset
inventory categories.
4. Provide methodologies to better prioritize reinvestment needs
including:
a. Life-cycle planning of long-lived assets such as maintenance
facilities, systems infrastructure and underground structures.
b. Innovative ways to evaluate the effects of capital reinvestment
decisions on system performance in terms of capacity, safety,
reliability, maintainability, and operating costs.
c. Risk-based approaches that factor in the risks associated with
deteriorating asset conditions as opposed to just relying on an asset's
age to set recapitalization priorities.
d. The ability to perform scenario analysis involving both
constrained and unconstrained needs, as well as the ability to project
the optimal distribution of work given likely funding levels along with
estimated impacts associated with deferred maintenance.
5. Simplify and improve the integrity of asset condition data
collection through the use of technology and process re-engineering.
For purposes of this TAM pilot program, FTA is primarily interested
in pursuing the TAM projects described above however, other TAM
projects may be proposed as long as they are consistent with FTA's
stated objectives in Section II and they meet the eligibility
requirements in Section IV.
Upon completion of FTA's proposal review, evaluation, scoring and
ranking process, FTA reserves the right to negotiate cooperative
agreement awards for entire proposal offerings or specific portions of
proposals.
C. Proposal Content
Proposals shall be limited to 60 pages in total length and shall
contain the following:
1. Cover sheet (1 page)--Includes the entity submitting the
proposal, the principal investigator's name, title, and contact
information (e.g. address, phone, fax, and e-mail). Name and contact
information for the entity's key point(s) of contact for all
cooperative activities (if different from the principle investigator).
2. Abstract (2 pages)--Abstract shall include project background,
purpose, demonstration methodology, intended outcomes, and method of
measuring how successful the project has been in achieving the intended
outcomes.
3. Statement of Eligibility--The eligibility requirements (as
listed in Section IV above) should be addressed in narrative form and
include a ``waiver letter'' stating FTA will have unrestricted rights
to use data outputs generated.
4. Project narrative (not to exceed 30 pages)--Project narrative
shall include the following information:
a. Project Understanding and TAM approach--Understanding of FTA's
goals and objectives the problem to be addressed, beyond the
description provided by FTA in this RFP; and the proposed approach for
executing the research project. Particular attention should be given to
describing how the proposing entity will ensure that the proposed TAM
project will result in beneficial systems and solutions that can be
readily implemented at other agencies of varying sizes and modes.
b. Past Experience--Experience in asset management implementation
and knowledge of public transportation management issues related to
asset management.
c. Technical Capacity--Technical experience and ability of the
proposing organization to address asset management issues identified in
this RFP and the availability of key project resources.
5. Preliminary Project Implementation Plan that includes well
defined objectives, resources, tasks to accomplish the objectives and a
schedule of activities with timelines, and deliverables.
6. A Small Business (SB) Subcontracting Plan detailing how small
businesses will be utilized as members of the proposing team. Joint
ventures with Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) firms (i.e.,
Small Business owned and controlled by Minorities, Women or Disabled
Veterans) with requisite experience are encouraged.
In addition to the required proposal elements, proposers have the
option to submit supplemental material such as: Brochures,
publications, products, letters of support etc. Such supplemental
materials, when submitted in appendices, will not be considered a part
of the 60-page proposal limit.
D. Deliverables
Successful proposers are not required to deliver proprietary
systems information to FTA. The following are required:
1. Monthly progress reports with a narrative describing progress on
key milestone activities, monthly and cumulative budget expenditures,
SB and DBE utilization, problems encountered and work planned for the
next month.
2. A detailed Project Implementation Plan within 15 working days of
receiving a Notice to Proceed (NTP).
[[Page 70969]]
3. Fifteen (15) bound copies (including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of an Interim Report presenting
objectives, approach, interim findings and recommendations along with
supporting data by May 30, 2011.
4. A presentation of the Interim Report, at FTA headquarters or via
webinar/conference call by June 6, 2011.
5. Fifteen (15) bound copies (including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of a Preliminary Report presenting
objectives, approach, preliminary findings, and recommendations,
supporting data, and comments from FTA on the Interim Report, no later
than 4 months after completion of Interim Report.
6. A presentation of the Preliminary Report, at FTA headquarters or
via webinar/conference call within two weeks of submission of
Preliminary Report.
7. Fifteen (15) bound copies (including 5 color copies) and an
electronic copy in PDF format of a Final Report, addressing preliminary
report findings and FTA comments, no later than 16 months after NTP.
8. A presentation of the Final Report at FTA headquarters or via
webinar/conference call within two weeks of submission of the Final
Report.
9. Forty (40) hours of technical assistance by suitable staff to
participate in information exchange forums such as webinars, meetings,
teleconferences, or workshops to explain TAM solution.
10. TAM software methodology, solutions and non proprietary TAM
systems information with appropriate level of documentation and
recommended practice(s) in a medium compatible with FTA software
system(s).
Proposers should plan on providing at least one of the three
presentations required above, in person to FTA at its headquarters in
Washington, DC. FTA will make every effort to accommodate webinars or
conference calls for the other two presentations.
Other deliverables, if applicable, will be negotiated prior to
award of the cooperative agreement(s). Electronic copies of all
deliverables must be provided in PDF format and in Microsoft Office.
VI. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria and
scoring system:
1. Project understanding and approach. (25%)
2. Technical capacity. (20%)
3. Product superiority based on the degree to which all eligibility
requirements are met or exceeded, including software products that
promote data interoperability. (30%).
4. Preliminary Project Implementation Plan. (15%)
5. Small Business Subcontracting Plan detailing how small
businesses will be utilized as members of the proposing team. (10%)
After technical proposals have been evaluated, scored and ranked
according to overall value, FTA will enter into negotiations with the
entities that submitted the highest ranked proposals to set the
cooperative agreement project scope and cost.
VII. Award Administration
Following receipt of the FTA Administrator's notification letter,
the successful entity(ies) will be required to submit its proposal
through the FTA Transportation Electronic Award Management (TEAM)
system. FTA will manage the cooperative agreement(s) through the TEAM
system. Before FTA may award Federal financial assistance through a
Federal cooperative agreement, the entity must submit all
certifications and assurances pertaining to itself and its project as
required by Federal laws and regulations. The Fiscal Year 2011 Annual
List of Certifications and Assurances for FTA Cooperative Agreements
and Guidelines will be published in the Federal Register and posted on
the FTA Web site at http:[sol][sol]www.fta.dot.gov.
VIII. Agency Contact
Contact Aaron C. James, Director, Office of Engineering, (202) 493-
0107, aaron.james@dot.gov for proposal-specific information and issues.
Issued in Washington, DC this 15th day of November 2010.
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-29176 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P