Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA; Increased Assessment Rate, 70571-70573 [2010-29107]
Download as PDF
70571
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 222
Thursday, November 18, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0059; FV10–987–2
FR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, CA; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Date Administrative
Committee (Committee) for the 2010–11
and subsequent crop years from $0.75 to
$1.00 per hundredweight of dates
handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order that
regulates the handling of dates grown or
packed in Riverside County, California.
Assessments upon date handlers are
used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The crop year begins
October 1 and ends September 30. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: November 19,
2010.
SUMMARY:
Jeff
Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or Kurt J.
Kimmel, Regional Manager, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906, or E-mail: Jeffrey.Smutny@
ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.
usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Nov 17, 2010
Jkt 223001
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
987, as amended (7 CFR part 987),
regulating the handling of dates grown
or packed in Riverside County,
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, Riverside County, California
date handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable dates beginning October 1,
2010, and will continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2010–11 and subsequent crop years
from $0.75 to $1.00 per hundredweight
of dates.
The California date marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
handlers of California dates. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area, and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2009–10 and subsequent crop
years, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from crop
year to crop year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 24, 2010,
and unanimously recommended 2010–
11 expenditures of $245,000 and an
assessment rate of $1.00 per
hundredweight of California dates. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $200,000. The
modified assessment rate of $1.00 is
$0.25 higher than the rate currently in
effect. The Committee recommended a
higher assessment rate to offset the
2010–11 budgeted increases in salaries,
operating expenses, and promotion
programs, and to build their operating
reserve. The higher assessment rate
should be sufficient to cover the 2010–
11 budgeted expenses and meet their
financial goals.
Section 987.72(c) authorizes the
Committee to establish and maintain an
operating reserve not to exceed 50
percent of an average year’s expenses.
Funds from the reserve are available for
the Committee’s use during the crop
year to cover budgeted expenses as
necessary or for other purposes deemed
appropriate by USDA. The Committee
expects to carry a $40,000 reserve into
the 2010–11 crop year. They expect to
add $16,500 to the reserve during the
year, for a desired carryout of
approximately $56,000, which is well
below the limit specified in the order.
Income from the sale of cull dates is
deposited in a surplus account for
subsequent use by the Committee to
cover the surplus pool share of the
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
70572
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Committee’s expenses. Handlers may
also dispose of cull dates of their own
production within their own livestockfeeding operation; otherwise, such cull
dates must be shipped or delivered to
the Committee for sale to non-human
food product outlets. Pursuant to
§ 987.72(b), the Committee is authorized
to temporarily use funds derived from
assessments to defray expenses incurred
in disposing of surplus dates. All such
expenses are required to be deducted
from proceeds obtained by the
Committee from the disposal of surplus
dates. For the 2010–11 crop year, the
Committee estimated that $1,500 from
the surplus account will be needed to
temporarily defray expenses incurred in
disposing of surplus dates.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 crop year include $85,000 for
general and administrative programs,
$127,875 for promotional programs,
$17,900 for nutritional research, and
$14,225 for marketing and media
consulting. The budgeted amount for
promotional programs includes a
$29,000 contingency fund that will
allow the Committee to take advantage
of unexpected marketing opportunities
that may present themselves during the
year.
By comparison, expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2009–10 crop year included $60,000 for
general and administrative programs,
$97,000 for promotional programs,
$15,000 for nutritional research, and
$28,000 for marketing and media
consulting.
The assessment rate of $1.00 per
hundredweight of assessable dates was
derived by applying the following
formula where:
A = 2009–10 estimated reserve on
09/30/10 ($40,000);
B = 2010–11 estimated reserve on
09/30/11 ($56,500);
C = 2010–11 expenses ($245,000);
D = Cull Surplus Fund ($1,500);
F = 2010–11 expected shipments
(26,000,000 pounds).
[(C¥A + B¥D)/F] × 100.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each crop year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Nov 17, 2010
Jkt 223001
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2010–11 budget and those
for subsequent crop years will be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers
of dates in the production area and 9
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. The Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently completed
crop year, 2009–10, indicates that about
3.8 tons, or 7,600 pounds, of dates were
produced per acre. The 2009–10
producer price published by NASS was
$1,450 per ton, or $0.725 per pound.
Thus, the value of date production in
2009–10 averaged about $5,510 per acre
(7,600 pounds per acre times $0.725 per
pound). At that average price, a
producer would have to farm more than
136 acres to receive an annual income
from dates of $750,000 ($750,000
divided by $5,510 per acre equals 136.1
acres). According to the Committee’s
staff, the majority of California date
producers farm fewer than 136 acres.
Thus, it can be concluded that the
majority of date producers could be
considered small entities. According to
data from the Committee, the majority of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
California date handlers may also be
considered small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2010–11
and subsequent crop years from $0.75 to
$1.00 per hundredweight of dates
handled. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2010–11 expenditures of
$245,000 and an assessment rate of
$1.00 per hundredweight of dates. The
assessment rate of $1.00 is $0.25 higher
than the 2009–10 rate currently in
effect. The quantity of assessable dates
for the 2010–11 crop year is estimated
at 26,000,000 pounds. Thus, the $1.00
rate should provide approximately
$260,000 in assessment income and will
be adequate to meet the budgeted
expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 crop year include $85,000 for
general and administrative programs,
$127,875 for promotional programs,
$17,900 for nutritional research, and
$14,225 for marketing and media
consulting. The Committee also hopes
to add $16,500 to its operating reserve.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from
various sources, such as the
Committee’s Marketing Subcommittee.
Alternative expenditure levels were
discussed, but the Committee ultimately
decided that the recommended levels
were reasonable to properly administer
the order. The assessment rate of $1.00
per hundredweight of dates was then
derived, based upon the Committee’s
estimates of the available operating
reserve, projected crop size, and
anticipated expenses.
As previously noted, NASS reported
that the average producer price for
2009–10 crop dates was $1,450 per ton,
or $72.50 per hundredweight. No
official NASS estimate is available yet
for 2010–11. However, the average
grower price for the three year period
between 2007–08 and 2009–10 was
$1,756.67 per ton, or $87.83 per
hundredweight.
Assuming that the average producer
price for 2010–11 will range between
$72.50 and $87.83 per hundredweight,
the estimated assessment revenue,
stated as a percentage of producer
revenue, will range between 1.38 and
1.14 percent ($1.00 per hundredweight
divided by either $72.50 or $87.83 per
hundredweight). Thus, assessment
revenue should be less than 1.5 percent
of estimated producer revenue for
2010–11.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs will
be offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California date industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the June
24, 2010, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California date
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 15, 2010 (75 FR
56019). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to
all California date handlers. Finally, the
proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of
Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending October 15, 2010, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:21 Nov 17, 2010
Jkt 223001
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because
handlers have already received 2010
dates from growers, the crop year began
on October 1, 2010, and the assessment
rate applies to all dates received during
the 2010–11 and subsequent seasons.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, a 30-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987—DATES PRODUCED OR
PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 987 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 987.339
Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2010, an
assessment rate of $1.00 per
hundredweight is established for
California dates.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29107 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1221
[Doc. No. AMS–LS–10–0003]
Sorghum Promotion and Research
Program: Procedures for the Conduct
of Referenda
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 1996
(Act) authorizes a program of
promotion, research, and information to
be developed through the promulgation
of the Sorghum Promotion, Research,
and Information Order (Order). The Act
requires that the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) conduct a
referendum among persons subject to
assessments who, during a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70573
representative period established by the
Secretary, have engaged in the
production or importation of sorghum.
This final rule establishes procedures
the Department of Agriculture (USDA)
will use in conducting the required
referendum as well as future referenda.
Eligible persons will be provided the
opportunity to vote during a specified
period announced by USDA. For the
program to continue, it must be
approved, with an affirmative vote, by at
least a majority of those persons voting
who were engaged in the production or
importation of sorghum during the
representative period.
DATES: Effective Date: December 20,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth R. Payne, Chief, Marketing
Programs Branch on 202/720–1115, fax
202/720–1125, or by e-mail at Kenneth.
Payne@ams.usda.gov or Rick Pinkston,
USDA, FSA, DAFO, on 202/690–8034,
fax 202/720–5900, or by e-mail on
rick.pinkston@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been determined
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and therefore has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the Act provides that the Act shall not
affect or preempt any other Federal or
State law authorizing promotion or
research relating to an agricultural
commodity.
Under section 519 of the Act, a person
subject to the Order may file a petition
with the Secretary stating that the
Order, any provision of the Order, or
any obligation imposed in connection
with the Order is not established in
accordance with the law, and may
request a modification of the Order or
an exemption from the Order. Any
petition filed challenging the Order, any
provision of the Order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Order,
shall be filed within 2 years after the
effective date of the Order, provision, or
obligation subject to challenge in the
petition. The petitioner will have the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, the Secretary will
issue a ruling on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States for any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70571-70573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29107]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 70571]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0059; FV10-987-2 FR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Date Administrative Committee (Committee) for the 2010-11
and subsequent crop years from $0.75 to $1.00 per hundredweight of
dates handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order
that regulates the handling of dates grown or packed in Riverside
County, California. Assessments upon date handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The
crop year begins October 1 and ends September 30. The assessment rate
will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Effective Date:
November 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 987, as amended (7 CFR part 987), regulating the handling of dates
grown or packed in Riverside County, California, hereinafter referred
to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, Riverside
County, California date handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable dates beginning October 1, 2010, and will continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2010-11 and subsequent crop years from $0.75 to $1.00
per hundredweight of dates.
The California date marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
California dates. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area, and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2009-10 and subsequent crop years, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from crop year to crop year unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 24, 2010, and unanimously recommended
2010-11 expenditures of $245,000 and an assessment rate of $1.00 per
hundredweight of California dates. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $200,000. The modified assessment rate of $1.00 is
$0.25 higher than the rate currently in effect. The Committee
recommended a higher assessment rate to offset the 2010-11 budgeted
increases in salaries, operating expenses, and promotion programs, and
to build their operating reserve. The higher assessment rate should be
sufficient to cover the 2010-11 budgeted expenses and meet their
financial goals.
Section 987.72(c) authorizes the Committee to establish and
maintain an operating reserve not to exceed 50 percent of an average
year's expenses. Funds from the reserve are available for the
Committee's use during the crop year to cover budgeted expenses as
necessary or for other purposes deemed appropriate by USDA. The
Committee expects to carry a $40,000 reserve into the 2010-11 crop
year. They expect to add $16,500 to the reserve during the year, for a
desired carryout of approximately $56,000, which is well below the
limit specified in the order.
Income from the sale of cull dates is deposited in a surplus
account for subsequent use by the Committee to cover the surplus pool
share of the
[[Page 70572]]
Committee's expenses. Handlers may also dispose of cull dates of their
own production within their own livestock-feeding operation; otherwise,
such cull dates must be shipped or delivered to the Committee for sale
to non-human food product outlets. Pursuant to Sec. 987.72(b), the
Committee is authorized to temporarily use funds derived from
assessments to defray expenses incurred in disposing of surplus dates.
All such expenses are required to be deducted from proceeds obtained by
the Committee from the disposal of surplus dates. For the 2010-11 crop
year, the Committee estimated that $1,500 from the surplus account will
be needed to temporarily defray expenses incurred in disposing of
surplus dates.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
crop year include $85,000 for general and administrative programs,
$127,875 for promotional programs, $17,900 for nutritional research,
and $14,225 for marketing and media consulting. The budgeted amount for
promotional programs includes a $29,000 contingency fund that will
allow the Committee to take advantage of unexpected marketing
opportunities that may present themselves during the year.
By comparison, expenditures recommended by the Committee for the
2009-10 crop year included $60,000 for general and administrative
programs, $97,000 for promotional programs, $15,000 for nutritional
research, and $28,000 for marketing and media consulting.
The assessment rate of $1.00 per hundredweight of assessable dates
was derived by applying the following formula where:
A = 2009-10 estimated reserve on 09/30/10 ($40,000);
B = 2010-11 estimated reserve on 09/30/11 ($56,500);
C = 2010-11 expenses ($245,000);
D = Cull Surplus Fund ($1,500);
F = 2010-11 expected shipments (26,000,000 pounds).
[(C-A + B-D)/F] x 100.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2010-11 budget and those
for subsequent crop years will be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers of dates in the production
area and 9 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order.
The Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) defines small
agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently completed crop year, 2009-10, indicates that
about 3.8 tons, or 7,600 pounds, of dates were produced per acre. The
2009-10 producer price published by NASS was $1,450 per ton, or $0.725
per pound. Thus, the value of date production in 2009-10 averaged about
$5,510 per acre (7,600 pounds per acre times $0.725 per pound). At that
average price, a producer would have to farm more than 136 acres to
receive an annual income from dates of $750,000 ($750,000 divided by
$5,510 per acre equals 136.1 acres). According to the Committee's
staff, the majority of California date producers farm fewer than 136
acres. Thus, it can be concluded that the majority of date producers
could be considered small entities. According to data from the
Committee, the majority of California date handlers may also be
considered small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2010-11 and subsequent
crop years from $0.75 to $1.00 per hundredweight of dates handled. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2010-11 expenditures of $245,000 and
an assessment rate of $1.00 per hundredweight of dates. The assessment
rate of $1.00 is $0.25 higher than the 2009-10 rate currently in
effect. The quantity of assessable dates for the 2010-11 crop year is
estimated at 26,000,000 pounds. Thus, the $1.00 rate should provide
approximately $260,000 in assessment income and will be adequate to
meet the budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
crop year include $85,000 for general and administrative programs,
$127,875 for promotional programs, $17,900 for nutritional research,
and $14,225 for marketing and media consulting. The Committee also
hopes to add $16,500 to its operating reserve. Prior to arriving at
this budget, the Committee considered information from various sources,
such as the Committee's Marketing Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure
levels were discussed, but the Committee ultimately decided that the
recommended levels were reasonable to properly administer the order.
The assessment rate of $1.00 per hundredweight of dates was then
derived, based upon the Committee's estimates of the available
operating reserve, projected crop size, and anticipated expenses.
As previously noted, NASS reported that the average producer price
for 2009-10 crop dates was $1,450 per ton, or $72.50 per hundredweight.
No official NASS estimate is available yet for 2010-11. However, the
average grower price for the three year period between 2007-08 and
2009-10 was $1,756.67 per ton, or $87.83 per hundredweight.
Assuming that the average producer price for 2010-11 will range
between $72.50 and $87.83 per hundredweight, the estimated assessment
revenue, stated as a percentage of producer revenue, will range between
1.38 and 1.14 percent ($1.00 per hundredweight divided by either $72.50
or $87.83 per hundredweight). Thus, assessment revenue should be less
than 1.5 percent of estimated producer revenue for 2010-11.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal
[[Page 70573]]
and uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed
on to producers. However, these costs will be offset by the benefits
derived by the operation of the marketing order. In addition, the
Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the California
date industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like
all Committee meetings, the June 24, 2010, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on
this issue.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California date handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56019). Copies of the proposed
rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all California date
handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of Federal Register. A 30-day comment period
ending October 15, 2010, was provided for interested persons to respond
to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because handlers have
already received 2010 dates from growers, the crop year began on
October 1, 2010, and the assessment rate applies to all dates received
during the 2010-11 and subsequent seasons. Further, handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987--DATES PRODUCED OR PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 987 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 987.339 Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2010, an assessment rate of $1.00 per
hundredweight is established for California dates.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-29107 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P