Market Test Involving Greeting Cards, 70753-70754 [2010-29086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices
Are there inconsistencies in audit
processes and audit results? If so,
what kinds and why? What are
current specific examples?
How do NERC and the Regional Entities
set priorities of what to audit, and are
they doing a good job setting
priorities?
Do audits focus too much on
documentation? Would alternative
auditing methods also demonstrate
compliance and improve reliability?
Possible improvements or solutions
• Event Analysis and Compliance
Focus on the potential tension between
event analysis/lessons learned and
NERC/RE compliance and
enforcement activities
• How can the Commission, NERC and
the Regional Entities help create a
culture of compliance?
III. Break (2:45–3:00)
IV. Panel 2: Violation Processing and
Penalties (3:00–4:30)
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Panelists:
Gerry W. Cauley, President and Chief
Executive Officer, NERC
Stacy Dochoda, General Manager, SPP
Regional Entity
Al Fohrer, Chief Executive Officer,
Southern California Edison Company
David Mohre, Executive Director,
Energy and Power Division, National
Rural Electric Cooperative
Association
John DiStasio, Chief Executive Officer,
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Stephen T. Naumann, Vice President for
Wholesale Market Development,
Exelon Corporation
Topics
• Streamlining processes to reduce
compliance violation backlogs and
minimize future backlogs
Regional Entity and NERC levels of
review
Appropriate Notice of Penalty records
Development of ‘‘traffic tickets,’’
‘‘parking tickets’’ and ‘‘warning
tickets’’
• How effective are the NERC Sanction
Guidelines, and are they applied
consistently? What changes may be
warranted to improve effectiveness
and/or consistency of the Sanction
Guidelines?
• Do current enforcement and
compliance processes provide
proactive approaches and improve
reliability by reducing future
reliability standard violations and
system disturbances?
What metrics are currently utilized for
compliance-based reliability
improvement?
What do these metrics show?
How can the Commission, NERC and
the Regional Entities promote
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 17, 2010
Jkt 223001
transparency of results and
dissemination of lessons learned?
V. Questions from the Audience (4:30–
4:50)
VI. Closing Statement
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–29068 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MT2011–1; Order No. 584]
Market Test Involving Greeting Cards
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service proposal to
conduct a market test involving greeting
cards. A key feature of the market test
is an alternative arrangement for
payment of postage. Under this
alternative, participating companies
would be responsible for paying
applicable postage, rather than having
the sender of the card affix postage. This
document describes the proposal,
addresses procedural aspects of the
filing, and invites public comment.
DATES: Comment deadline: December 8,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 or
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Notice of Filing
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 8, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice, pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 3641(c)(1), announcing its intent
to initiate a market test beginning on or
about January 1, 2011, of an
experimental market dominant product,
Alternate Postage Payment Method for
Greeting Cards.1 The market research
test will consist of providing a means
1 Notice of the United States Postal Service of
Market Test of Experimental Product—Alternative
Postage Payment Method for Greeting Cards,
November 8, 2010 (Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70753
for individuals to mail greeting cards
without affixing postage. Id. at 1.
II. Background
The Postal Service states that FirstClass Mail single-piece correspondence
has been a declining part of U.S. mail
volume, and the communication
alternatives, such as e-mail, use of the
Internet, and cellular services, have had
an impact on the mail volume of
personal correspondence. Id. at 3–4. It
proposes the instant market test as a
convenient method for individuals to
purchase a greeting card without the
need to pay postage. Id. at 4. The Postal
Service expects that the simplicity of
the product design, which allows the
customer to sign and address the card
and place it in a collection box, will
make greeting cards more likely to be
purchased and mailed. Id.
The Postal Service explains that
under the proposed market test
participating businesses will produce
and distribute pre-approved envelopes
according to specific design
requirements which will be packaged
for sale with greeting cards. Individuals
can mail the greeting cards in the preapproved envelopes without affixing
postage. Id. at 2. The Alternate Postage
Payment Method has a two-stage
process for businesses to pay postage.
Id. at 1. First, at least 50 percent of the
postage will be paid based on the
company’s reports on the number of
cards sold to customers or third-party
vendors. Generally, this payment would
be retained by the Postal Service
regardless of whether the cards are also
mailed. Second, the balance of the
postage due will be collected based on
scans of the cards that are mailed. Id. at
1, 6.
Statutory authority. The Postal
Service indicates that its proposal
satisfies the criteria of section 3641,
which imposes certain conditions on
experimental products. 39 U.S.C. 3641.
For example, the Postal Service asserts
that the Alternate Postage Payment
Method for Greeting Cards is
significantly different from all products
offered by the Postal Service within the
meaning of section 3641(b)(1). Notice at
8–9. In addition, it contends that the
market test will be limited to a small
portion of the total greeting card volume
and therefore does not create an unfair
or inappropriate competitive advantage
for the Postal Service or any mailer. Id.
at 9; see also section 3641(b)(2). The
Postal Service states that the Alternative
Postage Payment Method for Greeting
Cards is correctly classified as a market
dominant product. Id. at 10–11; see also
section 3641(b)(3). The Postal Service
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
70754
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices
states that the duration of the market
test will not exceed 24 months. Id. at 8.
The Postal Service does not anticipate
that the annual revenues from the
market test will exceed $50 million.
However, it does anticipate that annual
revenues will exceed $10,000,000 and
therefore requests that the Commission
exempt this market test from the annual
revenue limitation under 39 U.S.C.
3641(e)(2). Id. at 8, 12.
Description and nature of market test.
Pursuant to section 3641(c)(1)(B), the
Postal Service provides a description of
the nature and scope of the market test.
The Postal Service explains that
participating businesses will produce
and distribute pre-approved envelopes
with specific design requirements that
will be included as a part of the greeting
card packaging. The company
producing the cards will add markings
as defined by the Postal Service to
identify the greeting cards in the
mailstream and individuals can mail the
greeting cards in the pre-approved
envelopes without affixing postage.
These markings are scanned to produce
a count. Id. at 1. The Alternate Postage
Payment Method derives part of the
postage payment on sales data reported
to the Postal Service by participating
mailers. Id. at 2. The process involves
the use of Intelligent Mail (IM ®)
technology to identify and scan each
unique item’s movement through the
postal system which produces a count
of the number during normal
processing. Id. Each participating
business will receive a unique Mailer ID
only for this market test. Id. at 5. This
count is used to debit the card
producer’s Centralized Automated
Processing System (CAPS) account for
the portion of postage that was not
based on the sales data. Id. at 2.
Product description. Postage will be
paid by the card producer based on
sales information, along with the data
captured during mail processing. The
mailpieces include a combination of
four elements:
• Intelligent Mail Barcode (IMb)
enables the recording of piece-level
information for volume and revenue
reporting;
• Legend identifies the business
customer responsible for paying the
postage;
• Facing Identification Mark (FIM)
facilitates mail processing and allows
separate identification of this mail for
future use; and
• Imprint: ‘‘No Postage Necessary if
Mailed in the United States’’ will be
printed in the upper right corner of the
address side of the item.
Id. at 5.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Nov 17, 2010
Jkt 223001
Under the proposed market test, the
Postal Service states that participating
companies must meet specific mail item
design requirements which must be
approved prior to distribution. Id. The
Postal Service also states that market
test mail items will be processed and
delivered according to single-piece
First-Class Mail letter standards. Id. The
Postal Service expects that greeting card
companies will use the product to
increase the sale of greeting cards, and
customers will have a simpler manner
of mailing the cards. Id. at 6.
The Postal Service states that
Alternate Postage Payment Method will
be a premium product with a price
above First-Class Mail single-piece
postage. Id. The proposed price is 48
cents for cards and envelopes with a
combined weight of no more than one
ounce for sales or scans completed
during the first year. For mail and
envelopes with a combined weight
between one and two ounces, the price
will be 48 cents plus the second ounce
price for sales or scans during the first
year of the market test. In the test’s
second year, the Postal Service will
determine how to modify the price
based on market conditions and changes
in the single-piece price. It also plans to
test more than one postage rate during
the second year. Thus, the Postal
Service proposes a range of rates during
the market test period. Id. at 7.
The Postal Service contends that the
benefits of the market test include
reduction in the costs of selling stamps
to the public, proportional increase in
the mailing of greeting cards,
convenience, and a cost effective
product for customer. Id. Additionally,
it asserts that the product should
contribute to the financial stability of
the Postal Service.
The Notice also addresses the Postal
Service’s plan to monitor performance
and its data collection plan. Id. at 13.
III. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
No. MT2011–1 for consideration of
matters raised by the Notice. Interested
persons may submit comments on
whether the Postal Service’s filing in the
captioned docket is consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3641. Comments
are due no later than December 8, 2010.
The filing can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site
(http:www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Katrina R.
Martinez to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. MT2011–1 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Katrina
R. Martinez is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
3. Comments by interested persons
are due no later than December 8, 2010.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–29086 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2011–5; Order No. 583]
Postal Classification Changes
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request
announcing a classification change
affecting bundle and container charges
for Outside County Periodicals pieces in
combined mailings of Standard Mail
and Periodicals. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with this
filing.
SUMMARY:
Comment deadline: November
24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 or
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Additional Details
III. Commission Analysis and Initial Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 5, 2010, the United
States Postal Service, invoking
Commission rules 3020.90 and 91, filed
a Notice with the Commission
announcing a classification change
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70753-70754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MT2011-1; Order No. 584]
Market Test Involving Greeting Cards
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
proposal to conduct a market test involving greeting cards. A key
feature of the market test is an alternative arrangement for payment of
postage. Under this alternative, participating companies would be
responsible for paying applicable postage, rather than having the
sender of the card affix postage. This document describes the proposal,
addresses procedural aspects of the filing, and invites public comment.
DATES: Comment deadline: December 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 or stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Background
III. Notice of Filing
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 8, 2010, the Postal Service filed a notice, pursuant to
39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1), announcing its intent to initiate a market test
beginning on or about January 1, 2011, of an experimental market
dominant product, Alternate Postage Payment Method for Greeting
Cards.\1\ The market research test will consist of providing a means
for individuals to mail greeting cards without affixing postage. Id. at
1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of the United States Postal Service of Market Test of
Experimental Product--Alternative Postage Payment Method for
Greeting Cards, November 8, 2010 (Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
The Postal Service states that First-Class Mail single-piece
correspondence has been a declining part of U.S. mail volume, and the
communication alternatives, such as e-mail, use of the Internet, and
cellular services, have had an impact on the mail volume of personal
correspondence. Id. at 3-4. It proposes the instant market test as a
convenient method for individuals to purchase a greeting card without
the need to pay postage. Id. at 4. The Postal Service expects that the
simplicity of the product design, which allows the customer to sign and
address the card and place it in a collection box, will make greeting
cards more likely to be purchased and mailed. Id.
The Postal Service explains that under the proposed market test
participating businesses will produce and distribute pre-approved
envelopes according to specific design requirements which will be
packaged for sale with greeting cards. Individuals can mail the
greeting cards in the pre-approved envelopes without affixing postage.
Id. at 2. The Alternate Postage Payment Method has a two-stage process
for businesses to pay postage. Id. at 1. First, at least 50 percent of
the postage will be paid based on the company's reports on the number
of cards sold to customers or third-party vendors. Generally, this
payment would be retained by the Postal Service regardless of whether
the cards are also mailed. Second, the balance of the postage due will
be collected based on scans of the cards that are mailed. Id. at 1, 6.
Statutory authority. The Postal Service indicates that its proposal
satisfies the criteria of section 3641, which imposes certain
conditions on experimental products. 39 U.S.C. 3641. For example, the
Postal Service asserts that the Alternate Postage Payment Method for
Greeting Cards is significantly different from all products offered by
the Postal Service within the meaning of section 3641(b)(1). Notice at
8-9. In addition, it contends that the market test will be limited to a
small portion of the total greeting card volume and therefore does not
create an unfair or inappropriate competitive advantage for the Postal
Service or any mailer. Id. at 9; see also section 3641(b)(2). The
Postal Service states that the Alternative Postage Payment Method for
Greeting Cards is correctly classified as a market dominant product.
Id. at 10-11; see also section 3641(b)(3). The Postal Service
[[Page 70754]]
states that the duration of the market test will not exceed 24 months.
Id. at 8.
The Postal Service does not anticipate that the annual revenues
from the market test will exceed $50 million. However, it does
anticipate that annual revenues will exceed $10,000,000 and therefore
requests that the Commission exempt this market test from the annual
revenue limitation under 39 U.S.C. 3641(e)(2). Id. at 8, 12.
Description and nature of market test. Pursuant to section
3641(c)(1)(B), the Postal Service provides a description of the nature
and scope of the market test. The Postal Service explains that
participating businesses will produce and distribute pre-approved
envelopes with specific design requirements that will be included as a
part of the greeting card packaging. The company producing the cards
will add markings as defined by the Postal Service to identify the
greeting cards in the mailstream and individuals can mail the greeting
cards in the pre-approved envelopes without affixing postage. These
markings are scanned to produce a count. Id. at 1. The Alternate
Postage Payment Method derives part of the postage payment on sales
data reported to the Postal Service by participating mailers. Id. at 2.
The process involves the use of Intelligent Mail (IM [supreg])
technology to identify and scan each unique item's movement through the
postal system which produces a count of the number during normal
processing. Id. Each participating business will receive a unique
Mailer ID only for this market test. Id. at 5. This count is used to
debit the card producer's Centralized Automated Processing System
(CAPS) account for the portion of postage that was not based on the
sales data. Id. at 2.
Product description. Postage will be paid by the card producer
based on sales information, along with the data captured during mail
processing. The mailpieces include a combination of four elements:
Intelligent Mail Barcode (IMb) enables the recording of
piece-level information for volume and revenue reporting;
Legend identifies the business customer responsible for
paying the postage;
Facing Identification Mark (FIM) facilitates mail
processing and allows separate identification of this mail for future
use; and
Imprint: ``No Postage Necessary if Mailed in the United
States'' will be printed in the upper right corner of the address side
of the item.
Id. at 5.
Under the proposed market test, the Postal Service states that
participating companies must meet specific mail item design
requirements which must be approved prior to distribution. Id. The
Postal Service also states that market test mail items will be
processed and delivered according to single-piece First-Class Mail
letter standards. Id. The Postal Service expects that greeting card
companies will use the product to increase the sale of greeting cards,
and customers will have a simpler manner of mailing the cards. Id. at
6.
The Postal Service states that Alternate Postage Payment Method
will be a premium product with a price above First-Class Mail single-
piece postage. Id. The proposed price is 48 cents for cards and
envelopes with a combined weight of no more than one ounce for sales or
scans completed during the first year. For mail and envelopes with a
combined weight between one and two ounces, the price will be 48 cents
plus the second ounce price for sales or scans during the first year of
the market test. In the test's second year, the Postal Service will
determine how to modify the price based on market conditions and
changes in the single-piece price. It also plans to test more than one
postage rate during the second year. Thus, the Postal Service proposes
a range of rates during the market test period. Id. at 7.
The Postal Service contends that the benefits of the market test
include reduction in the costs of selling stamps to the public,
proportional increase in the mailing of greeting cards, convenience,
and a cost effective product for customer. Id. Additionally, it asserts
that the product should contribute to the financial stability of the
Postal Service.
The Notice also addresses the Postal Service's plan to monitor
performance and its data collection plan. Id. at 13.
III. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket No. MT2011-1 for consideration of
matters raised by the Notice. Interested persons may submit comments on
whether the Postal Service's filing in the captioned docket is
consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3641. Comments are due no
later than December 8, 2010. The filing can be accessed via the
Commission's Web site (http:www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Katrina R. Martinez to serve as Public
Representative in this docket.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. MT2011-1 for consideration
of the matters raised by the Notice.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Katrina R. Martinez is appointed to
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in this proceeding.
3. Comments by interested persons are due no later than December 8,
2010.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29086 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P