Safety Zone; Fireworks Displays, Potomac River, National Harbor, MD, 70126-70128 [2010-28898]
Download as PDF
70126
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
International Surface Airlift (ISAL)
International Direct Sacks—M–Bags
Global Customized Shipping Services
International Money Transfer Service
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU
rates)
International Ancillary Services
International Certificate of Mailing
International Registered Mail
International Return Receipt
International Restricted Delivery
International Insurance
Negotiated Service Agreements
Domestic
Outbound International
Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions
[Reserved]
Part D—Country Price Lists for International
Mail [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2010–28884 Filed 11–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0776]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Displays,
Potomac River, National Harbor, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone upon
specified waters of the Potomac River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during fireworks displays launched
from a discharge barge located at
National Harbor, in Prince Georges
County, Maryland. This safety zone is
intended to protect the maritime public
in a portion of the Potomac River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 p.m.
on November 17, 2010 through 11 p.m.
on November 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0776 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0776 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
e-mail Ronald L. Houck, Sector
Baltimore Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 410–
576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 1, 2010, we published
a temporary interim rule with request
for comments entitled ‘‘Safety Zone;
Fireworks Displays, Potomac River,
National Harbor, MD’’ in the Federal
Register (75 FR 169). We received one
comment on the interim rule. No public
meeting was requested, and none was
held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment; therefore, a 30-day
notice is impracticable. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone’s intended objectives of
protecting persons and vessels involved
in the event, and enhancing public and
maritime safety.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently
held from locations on or near the
navigable waters of the United States.
The potential hazards associated with
fireworks displays are a safety concern
during such events. The purpose of this
rule is to promote public and maritime
safety during five fireworks displays,
and to protect mariners transiting the
area from the potential hazards
associated with a fireworks display,
such as the accidental discharge of
fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and
falling hot embers or other debris. This
rule is needed to ensure safety on the
waterway during the scheduled events.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received a total of
one piece of correspondence in response
to the temporary interim rule. No public
meeting was requested and none was
held. What follows is a review of, and
the Coast Guard’s response to, the issues
and questions that were presented by
the commenter concerning the interim
rule.
The commenter, the sponsor’s
representative for the fireworks
displays, stated in an e-mail on
September 2, 2010 that a date change
had occurred for the fireworks display
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
scheduled on November 18, 2010. The
fireworks display will now be held on
November 17, 2010.
One change is being made to the
temporary final rule to reflect the
change in date for the fireworks display.
The temporary final rule will now be
enforced from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
November 17, 2010 and if necessary due
to inclement weather, from 6 p.m.
through 11 p.m. on November 18, 2010.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this safety zone will
restrict some vessel traffic, there is little
vessel traffic associated with
commercial fishing in the area, and
recreational boating in the area can
transit waters outside the safety zone. In
addition, the effect of this rule will not
be significant because the safety zone is
of limited duration and limited size. For
the above reasons, the Coast Guard does
not anticipate any significant economic
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate, transit, or
anchor in a portion of the Potomac
River, located at National Harbor, MD,
from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
November 17, 2010, and if necessary
due to inclement weather, from 6 p.m.
through 11 p.m. on November 18, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The safety zone is
of limited size and duration. In
addition, before the effective periods,
the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the waterway to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected area.
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Civil Justice Reform
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70127
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0776 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0776 Safety Zone; Fireworks
Displays, Potomac River, National Harbor,
MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: All waters in the
Potomac River, within an area bounded
by a line drawn from the following
points: latitude 38°47′18″ N, longitude
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
70128
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
077°01′01″ W; thence to latitude
38°47′11″ N, longitude 077°01′26″ W;
thence to latitude 38°47′25″ N,
longitude 077°01′33″ W; thence to
latitude 38°47′32″ N, longitude
077°01′08″ W; thence to the point of
origin, located at National Harbor,
Maryland (NAD 1983).
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR
165.23 apply to the safety zone created
by this temporary section,
§ 165.T05.0776.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Baltimore.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port Baltimore or his designated
representative by telephone at 410–576–
2693 or on VHF–FM marine band radio
channel 16.
(3) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channels
13 and 16.
(4) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. Captain of the Port
Baltimore means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6 p.m. through 11
p.m. on November 17, 2010, and if
necessary due to inclement weather,
from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
November 18, 2010.
Dated: October 26, 2010.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2010–28898 Filed 11–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
2011 Changes for Domestic Mailing
Services
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service will revise
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM®) to incorporate standards for the
introduction of Address Information
System services, for the discontinuation
of rigid flats claiming flats prices, and
other clarifications.
DATES: Effective January 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Chatfield, 202–268–7278.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 9
2010, the Federal Register published
the Postal Service proposed rule, New
Standards for Domestic Mailing Services
(75 FR 39477–39492). We are re-filing
separately with the Postal Regulatory
Commission (PRC) our request for two
incentive programs and for changes in
the Move Update tolerance and will
publish related standards in a separate
Federal Register notice. The Postal
Service is postponing implementation of
any changes directly related to a price
change.
This final rule includes changes in
terminology for some Standard Mail
letter prices, discontinuation of the
current exception that allows some rigid
flats to claim flats prices, a change in
the expression of decimal pounds for
Package Services parcels, the list of
Address Information System services,
and the mailing standards in the DMM
to implement the changes. We received
no customer comments on these
elements of the prior proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
Standard Mail Letters
Currently, nonbarcoded or
nonautomation-compatible Standard
Mail letters that are mailed at saturation
or high density prices pay the
corresponding nonautomation Standard
Mail flats prices. This causes confusion
for both customers and employees
regarding mail preparation. For
example, mailers often ask if they can
enter nonautomation saturation or high
density letters at destination delivery
unit (DDU) prices, which is allowed for
flats but not for letters. Similar
confusion exists regarding the price
terminology for nonmachinable letters
weighing more than 3.3 ounces, which
currently default to nonautomation flats
prices.
To reduce confusion, we are changing
the terminology used for the pricing of
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
nonbarcoded and/or nonautomationcompatible saturation and high density
letters by establishing a separate price
table for these pieces. Prices will be the
same as for saturation and high density
flats. This does not change the
applicable prices for these pieces; it
only clarifies the application of the
current prices.
We also will be using the term
‘‘nonmachinable letter prices’’ to refer to
presorted nonmachinable letters
weighing more than 3.3 ounces, instead
of using the current terminology.
Nonmachinable letters over 3.3 ounces
will continue to have the same prices as
nonautomation flats over 3.3 ounces,
but the prices will be called
nonmachinable letter prices.
Flats
The Postal Service found that rigid
flat-size pieces are generally less
efficient to handle than non-rigid flats,
even when they are able to be sorted by
our flat-sorting machines. Therefore, we
will eliminate the current option for
rigid flats to be eligible for automation
prices if they pass a Pricing and
Classification Service Centeradministered testing process. The
current flexibility test will remain as
described in DMM 301.1.3.
Parcels
Parcel Post®, Bound Printed Matter
(BPM), Media Mail®, and Library Mail
single-piece parcel weights will be
calculated by rounding off to two
decimal places, instead of the current
four decimal places.
Special and Other Services
Address Information System Products
and Services
Address Management at the USPS®
National Customer Support Center
(NCSC) in Memphis, TN, provides
value-added product and service
offerings that enable customers to better
manage the quality of their mailing lists
while maximizing the Postal Service’s
ability to deliver mail efficiently. Our
changes add a comprehensive list of
address information system products
and services available from the NCSC.
The prices for these items will be
incorporated into Notice 123—Price
List.
The Postal Service hereby adopts the
following changes to the Mailing
Services of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
which is incorporated by reference in
the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39
CFR Part 111.1.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70126-70128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28898]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0776]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Displays, Potomac River, National Harbor,
MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone upon specified
waters of the Potomac River. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters during fireworks displays
launched from a discharge barge located at National Harbor, in Prince
Georges County, Maryland. This safety zone is intended to protect the
maritime public in a portion of the Potomac River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 p.m. on November 17, 2010 through
11 p.m. on November 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0776 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0776 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Ronald L. Houck, Sector Baltimore Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 1, 2010, we published a temporary interim rule with
request for comments entitled ``Safety Zone; Fireworks Displays,
Potomac River, National Harbor, MD'' in the Federal Register (75 FR
169). We received one comment on the interim rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment; therefore, a 30-day notice is
impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone's intended objectives of protecting persons and vessels
involved in the event, and enhancing public and maritime safety.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently held from locations on or near
the navigable waters of the United States. The potential hazards
associated with fireworks displays are a safety concern during such
events. The purpose of this rule is to promote public and maritime
safety during five fireworks displays, and to protect mariners
transiting the area from the potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display, such as the accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. This
rule is needed to ensure safety on the waterway during the scheduled
events.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received a total of one piece of correspondence in
response to the temporary interim rule. No public meeting was requested
and none was held. What follows is a review of, and the Coast Guard's
response to, the issues and questions that were presented by the
commenter concerning the interim rule.
The commenter, the sponsor's representative for the fireworks
displays, stated in an e-mail on September 2, 2010 that a date change
had occurred for the fireworks display scheduled on November 18, 2010.
The fireworks display will now be held on November 17, 2010.
One change is being made to the temporary final rule to reflect the
change in date for the fireworks display. The temporary final rule will
now be enforced from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on November 17, 2010 and if
necessary due to inclement weather, from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on
November 18, 2010.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this safety zone will restrict
some vessel traffic, there is little vessel traffic associated with
commercial fishing in the area, and recreational boating in the area
can transit waters outside the safety zone. In addition, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because the safety zone is of limited
duration and limited size. For the above reasons, the Coast Guard does
not anticipate any significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
operate, transit, or anchor in a portion of the Potomac River, located
at National Harbor, MD, from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on November 17,
2010, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from 6 p.m. through 11
p.m. on November 18, 2010.
[[Page 70127]]
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. The
safety zone is of limited size and duration. In addition, before the
effective periods, the Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the waterway to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the affected area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a temporary safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0776 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0776 Safety Zone; Fireworks Displays, Potomac River,
National Harbor, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
in the Potomac River, within an area bounded by a line drawn from the
following points: latitude 38[deg]47'18'' N, longitude
[[Page 70128]]
077[deg]01'01'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'11'' N, longitude
077[deg]01'26'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'25'' N, longitude
077[deg]01'33'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'32'' N, longitude
077[deg]01'08'' W; thence to the point of origin, located at National
Harbor, Maryland (NAD 1983).
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05.0776.
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore
or his designated representative by telephone at 410-576-2693 or on
VHF-FM marine band radio channel 16.
(3) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channels 13 and 16.
(4) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to
act on his behalf.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by Federal,
State and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 p.m.
through 11 p.m. on November 17, 2010, and if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 6 p.m. through 11 p.m. on November 18, 2010.
Dated: October 26, 2010.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2010-28898 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P