Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; NIH NCI Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Initiative (NCI), 70268-70270 [2010-28883]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
70268
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Notices
(Response 11) CSPI suggested
extensive changes to the Nutrition Facts
label that affect many parts of the label.
In this research, the Agency is focused
on how consumers use labels for
products that are customarily consumed
at one eating occasion but may contain
more than one serving per container as
well as on how consumers react to
different ways that calorie information
is declared on the label. FDA believes
these changes have the potential to be
among the most useful changes to help
consumers make informed choices.
Therefore, FDA identified and chose the
proposed formats, such as dual column
formats and prominence of calorie
formats, for this study. The variety of
different experimental conditions for
just these changes requires a very large
number of respondents. It is not feasible
to test the additional extensive changes
such as those suggested by CSPI in this
study because the number of
respondents needed would become
unmanageable.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Portion of study
Number of
respondents
Annual frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per response
Total hours
Cognitive interview screener ......
Cognitive interview .....................
Pretest invitation ........................
Pretest ........................................
Experiment invitation ..................
Experiment .................................
96
12
1,000
150
50,000
10,000
1
1
1
1
1
1
96
12
1,000
150
50,000
10,000
0.083
1
0.033
0.25
0.033
0.25
8
12
33
38
1,650
2,500
Total ....................................
................................
................................
................................
..................................
4,241
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
In the 60-day notice that published in
the Federal Register of November 18,
2009, we estimated a total burden of
1,595 hours for the study. In this
document, table 1 has been modified to
reflect our re-evaluation of the original
study design. The new total estimated
burden is 4,241 hours.
To help design and refine the
questionnaire to be used for the
experimental study, we plan to conduct
cognitive interviews by screening 96
adult consumers in order to obtain 12
participants in the interviews. Each
screening is expected to take 5 minutes
(0.083 hours) and each cognitive
interview is expected to take 1 hour.
The total for cognitive interview
activities is 20 hours (8 hours + 12
hours). Subsequently, we plan to
conduct pretests of the questionnaire
before it is administered in the study.
We expect that 1,000 invitations, each
taking 2 minutes (0.033 hours), will
need to be sent to adult members of an
online consumer panel to have 150 of
them complete a 15-minute (0.25 hours)
pretest. The total for the pretest
activities is 71 hours (33 hours + 38
hours). For the experiment, we estimate
that 50,000 invitations, each taking 2
minutes (0.033 hours), will need to be
sent to adult members of an online
consumer panel to have 10,000 of them
complete a 15-minute (0.25 hours)
questionnaire. The total for the
experiment activities is 4,150 hours
(1,650 hours + 2,500 hours). Thus, the
total estimated burden is 4,241 hours.
FDA’s burden estimate is based on prior
experience with research that is similar
to this proposed study.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
II. References
1. Levy A., S. Fein, and R. Schucker,
‘‘Nutrition Labeling Formats:
Performance and Preference,’’ Food
Technology 45: 116–121, 1991.
2. Levy A., S. Fein, and R. Schucker,
‘‘More Effective Nutrition Label
Formats Are Not Necessarily
Preferred,’’ Journal of the American
Dietetic Association 92: 1230–1234,
1992.
3. Levy A., S. Fein, and R. Schucker,
‘‘Performance Characteristics of
Seven Nutrition Label Formats,’’
Journal of Public Policy and
Marketing 15: 1–15, 1996.
4. Lando A. and J. Labiner-Wolfe,
‘‘Helping Consumers to Make More
Healthful Food Choices: Consumer
Views on Modifying Food Labels
and Providing Point-of-Purchase
Nutrition Information at QuickService Restaurants,’’ Journal of
Nutrition Education and Behavior
39: 157–163, 2007.
5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
Calories Count: Report of the
Working Group on Obesity, 2004,
(https://www.fda.gov/Food/
LabelingNutrition/ReportsResearch/
ucm081696.htm).
6. 70 FR 17008, April 4 2005.
7. 70 FR 17010, April 4 2005.
8. 72 FR 62149, November 2 2007.
9. Schnieder Chafer, J.J., S.J. Newbery,
M.A. Riedl, et al., ‘‘Diagnosing and
Managing Common Food Allergies:
A Systematic Review,’’ Journal of
the American Medical Association
303(18): 1848–1856.
10. Silverglade, B and I.R. Heller, ‘‘Food
Labeling Chaos: The Case for
Reform,’’ Center for Science in the
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Interest, March 2010,
available at: https://
www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/
food_labeling_chaos_report.pdf.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–28966 Filed 11–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; NIH NCI Central
Institutional Review Board (CIRB)
Initiative (NCI)
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Cancer Institute (NCI), the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
the information collection listed below.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on August 16, 2010 (75 FR
49938) and allowed 60-days for public
comment. No public comments were
received. The purpose of this notice is
to allow 30 days for public comment.
The National Institutes of Health may
not conduct or sponsor, and the
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection that has
been extended, revised, or implemented
on or after October 1, 1995, unless it
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Notices
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Proposed Collection: Title: NIH NCI
Central Institutional Review Board
(CIRB). Type of Information Collection
Request: Existing Collection in Use
Without an OMB Number. Need and
Use of Information Collection: The CIRB
was created to reduce the administrative
burden on local IRBs and investigators
while protecting human research
participants. To accomplish this, the
CIRB uses several information collection
tools to ensure that CIRB operations
occur with high level of reviewer and
board member satisfaction and is absent
of conflicts of interest with the protocols
under review. Tools utilized to
accomplish this include the new
member packets which are completed
once a new member joins the CIRB to
provide background information on
workflow and processes of CIRB
operations as well as a non-disclosure
agreement. A conflict of interest form is
completed occasionally or each time the
reviewer is requested to serve as a
reviewer for a study. CIRB helpdesk
surveys measure satisfaction of
helpdesk users and is conducted
occasionally or each time the person
contacts the helpdesk. Frequency of
Response: Once, except for the SAE
Reviewer Worksheet. Affected Public:
Includes the Federal Government,
business or other for-profits and not-for-
70269
profit institutions. Type of Respondents:
Respondents include any customer who
contacts the CIRB Helpdesk,
institutional review board members and
CIRB review participants. The annual
reporting burden is estimated at 2209
hours (see Table 1 below for the
estimated time burden). The total
burden has decreased slightly as a result
of corrected calculations from what was
published in the 60-Day Federal
Register Notice. The average annual cost
to the government over a 12-month
period is approximately $153,574 per
year for a six year contract. This
includes total annualized capital/start
up costs of $25,108 and operating costs
of $150,637.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS
Survey instrument
Participants/Board
Members.
Participants ................
CIRB Helpdesk Survey (Attachment 1) .......
1,500
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
250
NCI CIRB Institution Enrollment Worksheet
(Attachment 2A).
IRB Staff at Signatory Institution’s IRB (Attachment 2B).
Investigator at Signatory Institution (Attachment 2C).
Research Staff at Signatory Institution (Attachment 2D).
Investigator at Affiliate Institution (Attachment 2E).
Research Staff at Affiliate Institution (Attachment 2F).
IRB at Signatory Institution (Attachment 2G)
Component Institution at Signatory Institution (Attachment 2H).
IRB at Affiliate Institution (Attachment 2I) ....
Institution Affiliate Institution without an IRB
(Attachment 2J).
Request for 30–Day Access Form (Attachment 2K).
Facilitated Review (FR) Acceptance Form
(Attachment 2L).
Study Review Responsibility Transfer Form
(Attachment 2M).
CIRB New Board Member Biographical
Sketch Form (Attachment 3B).
CIRB New Board Member Contact Information Form (Attachment 3C).
CIRB New Board Member W–9 (Attachment 3D).
CIRB New Board Member Non-Disclosure
Agreement (NDA) (Attachment 3E).
Direct Deposit Form (Attachment 4) ............
NCI Adult CIRB Application (Attachment
5A).
NCI Pediatric CIRB Application (Attachment
5B).
Adult/Pediatric CIRB Application—Ancillary
Studies (Attachment 5C).
Summary of CIRB Application Revisions
(Attachment 5D).
Adult/Pediatric CIRB Application for Continuing Review (Attachment 5E).
Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings—Initial Review of Cooperative Group Protocol (Attachment 6A).
30
1
3.5 hours ...................
105
65
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
65
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
65
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
65
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
65
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
65
65
1
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
11
65
65
1
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
11
11
50
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
8
1,450
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
242
120
1
10/60 (.17 hour) ........
20
16
1
30/60 (.5 hour) ..........
8
16
1
15/60 (.25 hour) ........
4
16
1
15/60 (.25 hour) ........
4
16
1
15/60 (.25 hour) ........
4
16
150
1
1
15/60 (.25 hour) ........
2 hours ......................
4
300
62
1
2 hours ......................
124
10
1
2 hours ......................
20
20
1
30/60 (.5 hour) ..........
10
230
1
1 hour ........................
230
20
1
4 hours ......................
80
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Participants ................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Participants ................
Board Members .........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Number of
respondents
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Frequency of
response
Average time per
response
(min/hr)
Type of
respondents
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Annual burden
hours
70270
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Type of
respondents
Survey instrument
Board Members .........
Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings—Initial
Review of Cooperative Group Protocol
(Attachment 6B).
Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings Cooperative
Group Response to CIRB Review (Attachment 6C).
Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings Cooperative Group Response to CIRB Review
(Attachment 6D).
Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings Amendment
Cooperative Group Protocol (Attachment
6E).
Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings Amendment to Cooperative Group Protocol (Attachment 6F).
Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings Continuing
Review of Cooperative Group Protocol
(Attachment 6G).
Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings Continuing Review of Cooperative Group Protocol (Attachment 6H).
CIRB Reviewer Form (Attachment 6I) .........
CIRB Statistical Reviewer Form (Attachment 6J).
CIRB SAE Reviewer Worksheet (Attachment 6K).
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
Board Members .........
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Total ...................
.......................................................................
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
points: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the function of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the
Attention: NIH Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Number of
respondents
17:30 Nov 16, 2010
Jkt 223001
Frequency of
response
1
4 hours ......................
48
25
1
1 hour ........................
25
70
1
1 hour ........................
70
130
1
1.5 hours ...................
195
50
1
1.5 hours ...................
75
150
1
.5 hour .......................
75
110
1
.5 hour .......................
55
20
20
1
1
2 hours ......................
2 hours ......................
40
40
10
15
30/60 (.5 hour) ..........
75
4,904
........................
...................................
2,209
Dated: November 10, 2010.
Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,
NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–28883 Filed 11–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Pretesting of
NIAID’s Biomedical HIV Prevention
Research Communication Messages
In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the
SUMMARY:
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Annual burden
hours
12
plans and instruments, contact Jeanne
Adler, Division of Cancer Treatment and
Diagnosis or call non-toll-free number
301–594–0083 or e-mail your request,
including your address to:
adlerj@mail.nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
PO 00000
Average time per
response
(min/hr)
Sfmt 4703
National Institutes of Health (NIH) will
publish periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval.
Proposed Collection: Title: Pretesting
of NIAID’s Biomedical HIV Prevention
Research Communication Messages.
Type of Information Collection Request:
Revision of a previously approved
collection. Need and Use of Information
Collection: This is a request for
clearance to pretest messages, materials
and program activities about biomedical
HIV prevention research. The primary
objectives of the pretests are to (1)
Assess audience knowledge, attitudes,
behaviors and other characteristics for
the planning/development of health
messages, education products,
communication strategies, and public
information programs; and (2) pretest
these health messages, products,
strategies, and program components
while they are in developmental form to
assess audience comprehension,
reactions, and perceptions. The
information obtained from audience
research and pretesting results in more
effective messages, materials, and
programmatic strategies. By maximizing
the effectiveness of these messages and
strategies for reaching targeted
audiences, the frequency with which
publications, products, and programs
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70268-70270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; NIH NCI Central
Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Initiative (NCI)
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve the
information collection listed below. This proposed information
collection was previously published in the Federal Register on August
16, 2010 (75 FR 49938) and allowed 60-days for public comment. No
public comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to allow
30 days for public comment. The National Institutes of Health may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to,
an information collection that has been extended, revised, or
implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless it
[[Page 70269]]
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: NIH NCI Central Institutional Review
Board (CIRB). Type of Information Collection Request: Existing
Collection in Use Without an OMB Number. Need and Use of Information
Collection: The CIRB was created to reduce the administrative burden on
local IRBs and investigators while protecting human research
participants. To accomplish this, the CIRB uses several information
collection tools to ensure that CIRB operations occur with high level
of reviewer and board member satisfaction and is absent of conflicts of
interest with the protocols under review. Tools utilized to accomplish
this include the new member packets which are completed once a new
member joins the CIRB to provide background information on workflow and
processes of CIRB operations as well as a non-disclosure agreement. A
conflict of interest form is completed occasionally or each time the
reviewer is requested to serve as a reviewer for a study. CIRB helpdesk
surveys measure satisfaction of helpdesk users and is conducted
occasionally or each time the person contacts the helpdesk. Frequency
of Response: Once, except for the SAE Reviewer Worksheet. Affected
Public: Includes the Federal Government, business or other for-profits
and not-for-profit institutions. Type of Respondents: Respondents
include any customer who contacts the CIRB Helpdesk, institutional
review board members and CIRB review participants. The annual reporting
burden is estimated at 2209 hours (see Table 1 below for the estimated
time burden). The total burden has decreased slightly as a result of
corrected calculations from what was published in the 60-Day Federal
Register Notice. The average annual cost to the government over a 12-
month period is approximately $153,574 per year for a six year
contract. This includes total annualized capital/start up costs of
$25,108 and operating costs of $150,637.
Table 1--Estimates of Annual Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Average time per response Annual burden
Type of respondents Survey instrument respondents response (min/hr) hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participants/Board Members............... CIRB Helpdesk Survey (Attachment 1,500 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 250
1).
Participants............................. NCI CIRB Institution Enrollment 30 1 3.5 hours.................. 105
Worksheet (Attachment 2A).
Participants............................. IRB Staff at Signatory 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution's IRB (Attachment
2B).
Participants............................. Investigator at Signatory 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution (Attachment 2C).
Participants............................. Research Staff at Signatory 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution (Attachment 2D).
Participants............................. Investigator at Affiliate 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution (Attachment 2E).
Participants............................. Research Staff at Affiliate 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution (Attachment 2F).
Participants............................. IRB at Signatory Institution 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
(Attachment 2G).
Participants............................. Component Institution at 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Signatory Institution
(Attachment 2H).
Participants............................. IRB at Affiliate Institution 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
(Attachment 2I).
Participants............................. Institution Affiliate 65 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 11
Institution without an IRB
(Attachment 2J).
Participants............................. Request for 30-Day Access Form 50 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 8
(Attachment 2K).
Participants............................. Facilitated Review (FR) 1,450 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 242
Acceptance Form (Attachment 2L).
Participants............................. Study Review Responsibility 120 1 10/60 (.17 hour)........... 20
Transfer Form (Attachment 2M).
Board Members............................ CIRB New Board Member 16 1 30/60 (.5 hour)............ 8
Biographical Sketch Form
(Attachment 3B).
Board Members............................ CIRB New Board Member Contact 16 1 15/60 (.25 hour)........... 4
Information Form (Attachment
3C).
Board Members............................ CIRB New Board Member W-9 16 1 15/60 (.25 hour)........... 4
(Attachment 3D).
Board Members............................ CIRB New Board Member Non- 16 1 15/60 (.25 hour)........... 4
Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
(Attachment 3E).
Board Members............................ Direct Deposit Form (Attachment 16 1 15/60 (.25 hour)........... 4
4).
Participants............................. NCI Adult CIRB Application 150 1 2 hours.................... 300
(Attachment 5A).
Participants............................. NCI Pediatric CIRB Application 62 1 2 hours.................... 124
(Attachment 5B).
Participants............................. Adult/Pediatric CIRB 10 1 2 hours.................... 20
Application--Ancillary Studies
(Attachment 5C).
Participants............................. Summary of CIRB Application 20 1 30/60 (.5 hour)............ 10
Revisions (Attachment 5D).
Participants............................. Adult/Pediatric CIRB Application 230 1 1 hour..................... 230
for Continuing Review
(Attachment 5E).
Board Members............................ Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings-- 20 1 4 hours.................... 80
Initial Review of Cooperative
Group Protocol (Attachment 6A).
[[Page 70270]]
Board Members............................ Pediatric CIRB Reviewer 12 1 4 hours.................... 48
Findings--Initial Review of
Cooperative Group Protocol
(Attachment 6B).
Board Members............................ Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings 25 1 1 hour..................... 25
Cooperative Group Response to
CIRB Review (Attachment 6C).
Board Members............................ Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings 70 1 1 hour..................... 70
Cooperative Group Response to
CIRB Review (Attachment 6D).
Board Members............................ Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings 130 1 1.5 hours.................. 195
Amendment Cooperative Group
Protocol (Attachment 6E).
Board Members............................ Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings 50 1 1.5 hours.................. 75
Amendment to Cooperative Group
Protocol (Attachment 6F).
Board Members............................ Adult CIRB Reviewer Findings 150 1 .5 hour.................... 75
Continuing Review of
Cooperative Group Protocol
(Attachment 6G).
Board Members............................ Pediatric CIRB Reviewer Findings 110 1 .5 hour.................... 55
Continuing Review of
Cooperative Group Protocol
(Attachment 6H).
Board Members............................ CIRB Reviewer Form (Attachment 20 1 2 hours.................... 40
6I).
Board Members............................ CIRB Statistical Reviewer Form 20 1 2 hours.................... 40
(Attachment 6J).
Board Members............................ CIRB SAE Reviewer Worksheet 10 15 30/60 (.5 hour)............ 75
(Attachment 6K).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ ................................ 4,904 .............. ........................... 2,209
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should address one or more of the
following points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the function of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the item(s) contained in this notice, especially regarding
the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be
directed to the Attention: NIH Desk Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202-395-6974. To
request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and instruments, contact Jeanne Adler,
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis or call non-toll-free number
301-594-0083 or e-mail your request, including your address to:
adlerj@mail.nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days
of the date of this publication.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,
NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-28883 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
