Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2011, 69992-70001 [2010-28825]
Download as PDF
69992
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
964TH—MEETING; REGULAR MEETING—Continued
[November 18, 2010, 10 a.m.]
Item No.
Docket No.
Company
C–2 ...............
C–3 ...............
CP10–78–000 ..........................
CP09–455–001 ........................
CP09–456–001 ........................
C–4 ...............
CP10–50–001 ..........................
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
A free webcast of this event is
available through https://www.ferc.gov.
Anyone with Internet access who
desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to https://www.ferc.gov’s
Calendar of Events and locating this
event in the Calendar. The event will
contain a link to its webcast. The
Capitol Connection provides technical
support for the free webcasts. It also
offers access to this event via television
in the DC area and via phone bridge for
a fee. If you have any questions, visit
https://www.CapitolConnection.org or
contact Danelle Springer or David
Reininger at 703–993–3100.
Immediately following the conclusion
of the Commission Meeting, a press
briefing will be held in the Commission
Meeting Room. Members of the public
may view this briefing in the designated
overflow room. This statement is
intended to notify the public that the
press briefings that follow Commission
meetings may now be viewed remotely
at Commission headquarters, but will
not be telecast through the Capitol
Connection service.
[FR Doc. 2010–29049 Filed 11–12–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9227–5]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section
128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal
Response Programs for FY2011
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency.
Notice.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2010
through January 31, 2011, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company.
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C.
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2011, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.3 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
available to provide technical assistance
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of
December 1, 2010. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2011.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S.
EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at https://
www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
U.S. EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of
Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566–2892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs.
1 The term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA Section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA Section
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Generally, these response programs
address the assessment, cleanup, and
redevelopment of brownfields sites and
other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regional
offices. This document provides
guidance that will enable states and
tribes to apply for and use Fiscal Year
2011 Section 128(a) funds.3
Requests for funding will be accepted
from December 1, 2010 through January
31, 2011. Requests received after
January 31, 2011 will not be considered
for FY2011 funding. Information
required to be submitted with the
funding request is contained in Section
IX. States or tribes that fail to submit the
request in the appropriate manner may
forfeit their ability to request funds.
First time requestors are strongly
encouraged to contact their Regional
Brownfields contacts listed at the end of
Section X, prior to submitting their
funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31,
2011 request deadline are preliminary;
final cooperative agreement work plans
and budgets will be negotiated with the
regional offices once final allocation
determinations are made. As in prior
years, EPA will place special emphasis
on reviewing a cooperative agreement
recipient’s use of prior 128(a) funding in
making allocation decisions.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their final
cooperative agreement package. For
more information, please go to https://
www.grants.gov.
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the Section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
in state and tribal Performance
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
128(a).
3 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
Partnership Grants, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a State or Tribal
response program.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields
sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of state and tribal response
programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA
related activities, while others are multifaceted, for example, addressing sites
regulated by both CERCLA and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Many state programs also
offer accompanying financial incentive
programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing Section
128(a),4 Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfields sites. Section
128(a) also provides EPA with an
opportunity to strengthen its
partnership with states and tribes.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and establish a public record.
The secondary goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase
the number of response actions
conducted or overseen by a state or
tribal response program. This funding is
not intended to supplant current state or
tribal funding for their response
programs. Instead, it is to supplement
their funding to increase their response
program’s capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA Section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
1. Demonstrate that its response
program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four
elements of a response program,
described Section V; or be a party to
voluntary response program
4 Section
128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Memorandum of Agreement (VRP
MOA) 5 with EPA; and
2. Maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned to
be addressed in the upcoming year, see
CERCLA Section 128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under Section
128(a), with the exception of the Section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund under CERCLA 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements—Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements.
Achievement of the four elements
should be viewed as a priority. Section
128(a) authorizes funding for activities
necessary to establish and enhance the
four elements and to establish and
maintain the public record requirement.
Generally, the four elements are:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites in state or tribal land.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to enable the state or
tribe to establish or enhance a system or
process that will provide a reasonable
estimate of the number, likely locations,
and the general characteristics of
brownfields sites in their state or tribal
lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of
state and tribal response programs and
will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfields sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
5 The legislative history of the Brownfields
Amendments indicates that Congress intended to
encourage states and tribes to enter into MOAs for
their voluntary response programs. States or tribes
that are parties to VRP MOAs and that maintain and
make available a public record are automatically
eligible for Section 128(a) funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69993
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA’s goal in funding
activities under this element is to have
state and tribal response programs that
include oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources that are adequate to ensure
that:
a. A response action will protect
human health and the environment and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable laws; and
b. the necessary response activities
are completed if the person conducting
the response activities fails to complete
the necessary response activities (this
includes operation and maintenance or
long-term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.6 EPA’s goal in
funding activities under this element is
to have states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms and
resources for meaningful public
participation, at the local level,
including, at a minimum:
a. Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is relying
on or developing in making cleanup
decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for
public comment on cleanup plans and
site activity; and
c. A mechanism by which a person
who is, or may be, affected by a release
or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant at
a brownfields site—located in the
community in which the person works
or resides—may request that a site
assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official must
consider this request and appropriately
respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a
cleanup plan and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms to approve cleanup plans
and to verify that response actions are
complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation
from the state, the tribe, or a licensed
site professional to the person
conducting the response action that the
6 States and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
69994
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
response action is complete. Written
approval by a state or tribal response
program official of a proposed cleanup
plan is an example of an approval
mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for Section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, described below, in order to
receive funds. Specifically, under
Section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions have been completed during the
previous year;
2. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions are planned to be addressed in
the next year; and
3. Identify in the public record
whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will
be suitable for unrestricted use. If not,
the public record must identify the
institutional controls relied on in the
remedy.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘Survey and
Inventory’’ Element From the ‘‘Public
Record’’
It is important to note that the public
record requirement differs from the
‘‘timely survey and inventory’’ element
described in the ‘‘Four Elements’’
section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year and are planned to be
addressed in the upcoming year. In
contrast, the ‘‘timely survey and
inventory’’ element, described above,
refers to a general approach to
identifying brownfields sites.
B. Making the Public Record Easily
Accessible
EPA’s goal is to enable states and
tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use Section 128(a) funding to make
the public record, as well as other
information, such as information from
the ‘‘survey and inventory’’ element,
available to the public via the internet
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
or other means. For example, the
Agency would support funding state
and tribal efforts to include detailed
location information in the public
record such as the street address and
latitude and longitude information for
each site.7
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public
Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to
maintain public record information,
including data on institutional controls,
on a long term basis (more than one
year) for sites at which a response action
has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes
may include development and operation
of systems that ensure long term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls, in their work plans.8
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use a cooperative
agreement to ‘‘establish or enhance’’
their response programs, including
elements of the response program that
include activities related to responses at
brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Develop legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
that would establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of
their response programs;
• Establish and maintain the required
public record as described in Section VI;
• EPA considers activities related to
maintaining and monitoring
7 For further information on latitude and
longitude information, please see EPA’s data
standards Web site available at https://
iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/
findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude
8 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA’s institutional
controls Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/
policy/ic/index.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
institutional controls to be eligible costs
under Section 128(a);
• Conduct limited site-specific
activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities
establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four
elements. In addition to the requirement
per CERCLA Section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to
obtain public comment on cleanup
plans and site activities, EPA strongly
encourages states and tribes to seek
public input regarding the priority of
sites to be addressed and solicit input
from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice
communities, communities with a
health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with
government agencies. EPA will not
provide Section 128(a) funds solely for
assessment or cleanup of specific
brownfields sites; site specific activities
must be an incidental part of an overall
Section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish
or enhance the four elements;
• Capitalize a revolving loan fund
(RLF) for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA Section 104(k)(3). These RLFs
are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative agreement
terms and conditions applicable to RLFs
awarded under Section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent
match on the amount of Section 128(a)
funds used for the RLF, a prohibition on
using EPA cooperative agreement funds
for administrative costs relating to the
RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF
loans or subgrants for response costs at
a site for which the recipient may be
potentially liable under Section 107 of
CERCLA. Other prohibitions contained
in CERCLA Section 104(k)(4) also apply;
or
• Purchase environmental insurance
or develop a risk-sharing pool,
indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal
response program.
B. Uses Related to ‘‘Establishing’’ a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA Section 128(a),
‘‘establish’’ includes activities necessary
to build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use Section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, or guidance.
For more developed state or tribal
response programs, ‘‘establish’’ may also
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
include activities that keep their
program at a level that meets the four
elements and maintains a public record
required as a condition of funding under
CERCLA Section 128(b)(1)(C).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
C. Uses Related to ‘‘Enhancing’’ a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA Section 128(a),
‘‘enhance’’ is related to activities that
add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under a state or
tribal response program.
The exact ‘‘enhancement’’ uses that
may be allowable depend upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that Section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, e.g., Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
or Underground Storage Tanks (USTs).
As another example, states and tribal
response programs enhancement
activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness
and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and intuitional controls. Other
‘‘enhancement’’ uses may be allowable
as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that improve
state or tribal capacity to increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under the state or
tribal response program. The amount
requested for site-specific assessments
and cleanups may not exceed 50% of
the total amount of funding requested.
Other eligible uses of funds for sitespecific related activities (i.e., site
specific but do not involve conducting
actual site assessments or cleanups)
include, but are not limited to, the
following. EPA does not cap the amount
of funding applicants may request for
these activities:
• Oversight of response action;
• technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
• development and/or review of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs);
• preparation and submission of
Property Profile Forms; and
• auditing site cleanups to verify the
completion of the cleanup.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
E. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. In addition to
the requirement per CERCLA Section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to obtain public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide Section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be an incidental part of
an overall Section 128(a) work plan that
includes funding for other activities that
establish or enhance the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups
must comply with all applicable laws
and are subject to the following
restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be
used for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a brownfields
site at CERCLA 101(39).
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site can be funded for
assessments with Section 128(a) funds,
and no more than $200,000 per site can
be funded for cleanups with Section
128(a) funds.
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/
tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and clean up
sites owned or operated by the
recipient.
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot
be conducted at sites where the state/
tribe is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA Section 107,
except:
Æ At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA Section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
Æ when the recipient would satisfy all
of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA Section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69995
1. At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA Section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. when the recipient would satisfy all
of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
F. Costs Incurred for Activities at ‘‘NonBrownfields’’ Sites
Costs incurred for activities at nonbrownfields sites, e.g., oversight, may be
eligible and allowable if such activities
are included in the state’s or tribe’s
work plan. For example, auditing
completed site cleanups in jurisdictions
where states or tribes use licensed site
professionals, to verify that sites have
been properly cleaned up, may be an
eligible cost under Section 128(a). These
costs need not be incurred in
connection with a brownfields site to be
eligible, but must be authorized under
the state’s or tribe’s work plan to be
allowable. Other uses may be eligible
and allowable as well, depending upon
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. However, assessment and cleanup
activities may only be conducted on
eligible brownfields sites, as defined in
CERCLA Section 101(39).
G. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use Section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance their response programs,
even if their response programs address
petroleum contamination. Also, the
costs of site-specific activities, such as
site assessments or cleanup at
petroleum contaminated brownfields
sites, defined at CERCLA Section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are
allowable if the activity is included in
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
used at brownfields sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA Section 104(k)(3).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines
for 128(A) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
Section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 9 with a state or
9 A cooperative agreement is an assistance
agreement to a state or a tribe that includes
substantial involvement of EPA regional
enforcement and program staff during performance
of activities described in the cooperative agreement
work plan. Examples of this involvement include
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
Continued
16NON1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
69996
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
tribe. The program is administered
under the general EPA grant and
cooperative agreement regulations for
states, tribes, and local governments
found in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 40 CFR part 31. Under
these regulations, the cooperative
agreement recipient for Section 128(a)
grant program is the government to
which a cooperative agreement is
awarded and which is accountable for
the use of the funds provided. The
cooperative agreement recipient is the
entire legal entity even if only a
particular component of the entity is
designated in the cooperative agreement
award document.
A. One application per state or tribe.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA
regional offices will negotiate and enter
into Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Define the state or tribal response
program. States and tribes must define
in their work plan the ‘‘Section 128(a)
response program(s)’’ to which the funds
will be applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will
be EPA’s primary point of contact for
negotiations on their proposed work
plan. When EPA funds the Section
128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among
the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the Section 128(a)
response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual
work plan.
C. Separate cooperative agreements
for the capitalization of RLFs using
Section 128(a) funds. If a portion of the
128(a) grant funds requested will be
used to capitalize a revolving loan fund
for cleanup, pursuant to 104(k)(3), two
separate cooperative agreements must
be awarded, i.e., one for the RLF and
one for non-RLF uses. States and tribes
may, however, submit one initial
request for funding, delineating the RLF
as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority to manage a revolving
loan fund program. If a state or tribe
chooses to use its 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund
program, the state or tribe must have the
authority to manage the program, e.g.,
issue loans. If the agency/department
listed as the point of contact for the
128(a) cooperative agreement does not
have this authority, it must be able to
technical assistance and collaboration on program
development and site-specific activities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
demonstrate that another state or tribal
agency does have the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
E. Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements can be part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG).
States and tribes may include Section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a)
funds used to capitalize an RLF or
purchase insurance or develop a risk
sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project period. EPA regional offices
will determine the project period for
each cooperative agreement. These may
be for multiple years depending on the
regional office’s cooperative agreement
policies. Each cooperative agreement
must have an annual budget period tied
to an annual work plan.
G. Demonstrating the four elements.
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section V. EPA will not fund, in future
years, state or tribal response program
annual work plans if EPA determines
that these requirements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made.
EPA may base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, or on EPA’s
review of the state or tribal response
program.
H. Establishing and maintaining the
public record. Prior to funding a state’s
or tribe’s annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and
document that a public record, as
described above, exists and is being
maintained.10
3. States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY10: Requests for
FY11 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the January 31, 2011 request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note: this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY10 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY10 funds prior to meeting public
record requirement). States or tribes in
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds,
once the public record requirement is
10 For purposes of cooperative agreement funding,
the state’s or tribe’s public record applies to that
state’s or tribe’s response program(s) that utilized
the Section 128(a) funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
met, but will be restricted from applying
for FY11 funding.
4. States or Tribes that received initial
funding in FY10: by the time of the
actual FY11 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY11
cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY11 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
5. Recipients receiving funds for the
first time in FY11: these recipients have
one year to meet this requirement and
may utilize the 128(a) cooperative
agreement funds to do so.
I. Demonstration of significant
utilization of prior years’ funding.
During the allocation process, EPA
headquarters places significant
emphasis on the utilization of prior
years’ funding. Unused funds from prior
years will be considered in the
allocation process. Existing balances in
EPA’s Financial Data Warehouse could
support an allocation amount below a
grantee’s request for funding. If a
grantee wishes to avoid an allocation
reduction, when submitting a request
for FY11 funds, include a detailed
explanation and justification of funds
that remain in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse from prior years (that are
related to response program activities or
brownfield related activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to
identify the amount of remaining prior
year(s) funds. The cooperative
agreement recipient should work, as
early as possible, with both their own
finance department, and with their
Regional Project Officer to reconcile any
discrepancy between the amount of
unspent funds showing in EPA’s
system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient’s records. The recipient should
obtain concurrence from the Region on
the amount of unspent funds requiring
justification by the deadline for this
request for funding.
J. Explanation of proposed activity/
task that would require an increase from
the FY10 funding amount. Due to the
limited amount of funding available,
recipients must demonstrate the
environmental benefits of undertaking
the proposed activity/task and how that
activity/task supports the four elements
of a response program in addition to
highlighting any activities in local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies.
Refer to Section IX for information to be
submitted with funding request.
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Fund
For Fiscal Year 2011, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.3 million per state or
tribe. This limit may be changed in
future years based on appropriation
amounts and demand for funding.
Please note the CERCLA 128(a) annual
program’s budget has remained static
while demand for funding continues to
increase every year.11 Therefore, in most
instances the FY11 state and tribal
individual funding amounts will not
meet the FY10 funding amounts.
Requests for increases over the FY10
funding amount will be considered only
after allocations are made to cover basic
core support to programs of all eligible
requestors.
After the January 31, 2011 request
deadline, regional offices will submit
summaries of state and tribal requests to
EPA headquarters. Before submitting
requests to EPA headquarters, regional
offices may take into account additional
factors when determining recommended
allocation amounts. Such factors
include, but are not limited to, the
depth and breadth of the state or tribal
program; scope of the perceived need
for the funding, e.g., size of state or
tribal jurisdiction or the proposed work
plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of prior funding, and
funds remaining from prior years, etc.
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate
funds accordingly.
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
IX. Information To Be Submitted With
the Funding Request
A. Demonstration of significant
utilization of prior years’ funding
States and tribes requesting 128(a)
FY11 funds must submit the following
information, as applicable, to their
regional contact on or before January 31,
2011 (regions may request additional
information, as needed):
• For those states and tribes with
prior Targeted Brownfields Assessment
funding awarded under CERCLA 104(d),
provide, by agreement number, the
amount of funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e., those
funds that remain in EPA’s Financial
FY11
Requested
$XX,XXX
..................
$XX,XXX
..................
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms;.
..................
..................
11 FY10 EPA received $67.1 Million in requests
for funding from States and Tribes under CERCLA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Data Warehouse). EPA will take into
account these funds in the allocation
process. A cooperative agreement
recipient can choose to provide a
justification to EPA that explains why
the underused funds should not be
considered in the current request for
funding.
• For those states and tribes that
received FY08 or prior Section 128(a)
funds, you must provide the amount of
FY03, FY04, FY05, FY06 FY07 and/or
FY08 funds that have not been
requested for reimbursement (i.e., those
funds that remain in EPA’s Financial
Data Warehouse). EPA will take into
account these funds in the allocation
process.
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY11
Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY11
funds must submit a summary of the
planned use of the funds with
associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the following
format below:
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
1. Examples:
• inventory and prioritize brownfields sites.
2. Examples:
• develop/enhance ordinances, regulations, procedures
for response programs.
128(a). The FY10 enacted budget was $49.5 Million.
PO 00000
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made. Please refer to process flow chart
below:
The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$17 Million.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
EN16NO10.026
FY10
Awarded
Establish or Enhance the four elements: ............................
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites; ..........
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Funding use
69997
69998
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
Funding use
FY10
Awarded
FY11
Requested
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for public participation;.
..................
..................
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan and
verification and certification that cleanup is complete..
Establish and Maintain the Public Record. .........................
..................
..................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Enhance the Response Program. .......................................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Site-specific Activities (amount requested should be incidental to the workplan, e.g., less than half of the total
funding requested see Section VII.D for more information on what activities should be considered when calculating site specific activities.).
Environmental Insurance ....................................................
Revolving Loan Fund ..........................................................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
3. Examples:
• develop a community involvement process.
• fund an outreach coordinator.
• issue public notices of site activities.
• develop a process to seek public input from local communities, especially potential environmental justice
communities, communities with a health risk related to
exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and communities with limited experience working with government agencies to prioritize sites to be
addressed.
4. Examples:
• review cleanup plans and verify completed actions.
• maintain public record.
• create web site for public record.
• disseminate public information on how to access the
public record.
• provide oversight of site assessments and cleanups.
• attend training and conferences on brownfields cleanup technologies & other brownfields topics.
• update and enhance program management activities.
• negotiate/oversee contracts for response programs.
• enhance program management & tracking systems.
• prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into ACRES
database.
• perform site assessments and cleanups.
• develop QAPPs.
• prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into ACRES
database for these sites.
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Total Funding ...............................................................
$XXX,XXX
$XXX,XXX
C. Explanation of proposed activity/task
that would require an increase from the
FY10 funding amount
For those states and tribes requesting
amounts above their FY10 allocation, a
separate explanation must be provided
using the format below or the
explanation can be made in a narrative
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Explanation of request(s) for funding
above FY10 award level
• review potential uses of environmental insurance.
• create a cleanup revolving loan fund.
Performance Partnership Grant? Yes b No b
form. The request should clearly
demonstrate the environmental benefits
of the proposed activity/task and how it
directly supports the establishment and
enhancement of the four elements of a
response program. Requests for
increases over the FY10 funding amount
will be considered only after allocations
are made to cover basic core support to
One time 13 request or recurring?
Amount
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
$XX,XXX
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
$XX,XXX
Site-specific Activities (amount requested
should be incidental to the workplan,
e.g., less than half of the total funding
requested).
$XX,XXX
12 FY10 EPA received $67.1 Million in requests
for funding from States and Tribes under CERCLA
128(a). The FY10 enacted budget was $49.5 Million.
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Explanation/anticipated outcome
$XX,XXX
Establish or Enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites; 2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms; 3. Mechanisms and resources
to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation; and/or 4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan
and verification and certification that
cleanup is complete.
Establish and Maintain the Public
Record.
Enhance the Response Program ............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
programs of all eligible requestors.
Please note the CERCLA 128(a) annual
program’s budget has remained static
while demand for funding continues to
increase every year.12 Therefore, in most
instances the FY11 state and tribal
individual funding amounts will not
meet the FY10 funding amounts.
Increases in funding are unlikely.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$17 Million.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
Explanation of request(s) for funding
above FY10 award level
Environmental Insurance .........................
$XX,XXX
Revolving Loan Fund ..............................
$XX,XXX
Total Increase Requested ................
$XX,XXX
13 A
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
One Time b ...............................
Recurring b ................................
.....................................................
Explanation/anticipated outcome
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Explanation of environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
one time request is not likely to repeat whereas a recurring charge is likely to periodically occur again.
D. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2011, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2009 through September 30,
2010). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate ‘‘N/A’’):
• Number of properties enrolled in
the response program supported by the
CERCLA 128(a) funding.
• Number of properties that received
a ‘‘No Further Action’’ (NFA)
documentation or a Certificate of
Completion (COC) or equivalent, AND
have all required institutional controls
in place.
• Number of properties that received
an NFA or COC or equivalent and do
NOT have all required institutional
controls in place.
• Total number of acres associated
with properties in the second bullet
above.
• (OPTIONAL) Number of properties
where assistance was provided, but the
property was NOT enrolled in the
response program.
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and
tribal response programs will include
programmatic and administrative terms
and conditions. These terms and
conditions will describe EPA’s
substantial involvement including
technical assistance and collaboration
on program development and sitespecific activities. Each of the
subsections below summarizes the basic
terms and conditions and related
reporting that will be required if a
cooperative agreement with EPA is
awarded.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
One time 13 request or recurring?
Amount
69999
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40,
state and tribes must provide progress
reports as provided in the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement
negotiated with EPA regional offices.
State and tribal costs for complying with
reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must
include both a narrative discussion and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
performance data relating to the state’s
or tribe’s accomplishments and
environmental outputs associated with
the approved budget and workplan and
should provide an accounting of section
128(a) funding. If applicable, the state or
tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or
enhancing the four elements of the
state’s or tribe’s response program. All
recipients must provide information
relating to establishing or, if already
established, maintaining the public
record. Depending upon the activities
included in the state’s or tribe’s work
plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting environmental insurance.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for environmental insurance
must report:
Æ Number and description of
insurance policies purchased (e.g., type
of coverage provided; dollar limits of
coverage; any buffers or deductibles;
category and identity of insured
persons; premium; first dollar or
umbrella; site specific or blanket;
occurrence or claims made, etc.)
Æ The number of sites covered by the
insurance
Æ The amount of funds spent on
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
dedicated to insurance program, or to
insurance premiums)
Æ The amount of claims paid by
insurers to policy holders
2. Reporting for site-specific
assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for brownfields site assessment
or cleanup must input information
required by the OMB-approved Property
Profile Form into the Assessment
Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange
System (ACRES) database for each site
assessment and cleanup. In addition,
recipients must report how they provide
the affected community with prior
notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA Section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed cleanup
plans and site activities. For example,
EPA strongly encourages states and
tribes to seek public input regarding the
priority of sites to be addressed and
solicit input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with
government agencies.
3. Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must include a
description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the
activity was conducted. For example:
Æ Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups.
Æ Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted.
Æ Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities.
Æ Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities.
4. Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients
with work plans that include funding
for revolving loan fund (RLF) must
include the information required by the
terms and conditions for progress
reporting under CERCLA section
104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
5. Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they are
taking reasonable steps to establish or
enhance the element as negotiated in
individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(B), reports on the oversight
and enforcement authorities/
mechanisms element may include:
Æ A narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
• legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements);
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
70000
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
• policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
Æ a description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
Æ a narrative description of how these
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources, are adequate to ensure that:
Æ a response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
Æ a narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request
other information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2011, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2009 through September 30,
2010). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate a ‘‘N/A’’):
• Number of properties enrolled in
the response program supported by the
CERCLA section 128(a) funding.
• Number of properties that received
a ‘‘No Further Action’’ (NFA)
documentation or a Certificate of
Completion (COC) or equivalent, AND
have all required institutional controls
in place.
• Number of properties that received
an NFA or COC or equivalent and do
NOT have all required institutional
controls in place.
• Total number of acres associated
with properties in the second bullet
above.
• (OPTIONAL) Number of properties
where assistance was provided, but the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
property was NOT enrolled in the
response program.
Where applicable, EPA may require
states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the
four elements which can be aggregated
for national reporting to Congress.
For example:
1. Timely Survey & Inventory—
Estimated number of brownfields sites
in the state or on tribal land.
2. Oversight & Enforcement
Authorities/Mechanisms—Number of
active cleanups and percentage that
received oversight; percentage of active
cleanups not in compliance with the
cleanup workplan and that received
communications from recipient
regarding non-compliance.
3. Public Participation—Percentage of
sites in the response program where
public meetings/notices were conducted
regarding the cleanup plan and/or other
site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests.
4. Cleanup Approval/Certification
Mechanisms—Total number of ‘‘no
further action’’ letters or total number of
certificate of completions.
(NOTE: where applicable, this
reporting requirement may include
activities not funded with CERCLA
Section 128(a) monies, because this
information may be used by EPA to
evaluate whether recipients without
MOAs have met or are taking reasonable
steps to meet the four elements of a
response program pursuant to CERCLA
Section 128(a)(2).)
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as
specified in the terms and conditions of
their cooperative agreement,
information related to establishing or, if
already established, maintaining the
public record, described above. States
and tribes can refer to an already
existing public record, e.g., Web site or
other public database to meet the public
record requirement. Recipients
reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record a.
exists and is up-to-date b. is adequate.
A public record may include the
following information:
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed including:
• Date the response action was
completed.
• Site name.
• Name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known.
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude).
• Whether an institutional control is
in place.
• Explain the type of institutional
control in place (e.g., deed restriction,
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.)
• Nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
contaminants, or pollutants, petroleum
contamination, etc.)
• Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed
by the state or tribal response program
including:
• Site name and the name of owner
at time of cleanup, if known.
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude).
• To the extent known, whether an
institutional control is in place.
• Explain the type of the institutional
control in place (e.g., deed restriction,
zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.)
• To the extent known, the nature of
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.)
• Size of the site in acres.
D. Award administration information
1. Subaward and executive
compensation reporting
Applicants must ensure that they
have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the
subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements
established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an
exception from the requirements,
should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
and Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these
requirements under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 25 (e.g., individuals),
applicants must:
a. Be registered in the CCR prior to
submitting an application or proposal
under this announcement. CCR
information can be found at: https://
www.bpn.gov/ccr/.
b. Maintain an active CCR registration
with current information at all times
during which it has an active Federal
award or an application or proposal
under consideration by an agency, and
c. Provide its DUNS number in each
application or proposal it submits to the
agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number, at no cost, by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS Number
request line at 1–866–705–5711, or
visiting the D&B Web site at: https://
www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with
these requirements, it will, should it be
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices
selected for award, affect their ability to
receive the award.
3. Use of funds
An applicant that receives an award
under this announcement is expected to
manage assistance agreement funds
efficiently and effectively and make
sufficient progress towards completing
the project activities described in the
work-plan in a timely manner. The
70001
assistance agreement will include
terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
REGIONAL STATE AND TRIBAL BROWNFIELDS CONTACTS
Region
State
Tribal
1—CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT
James Byrne, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2) Boston, MA 02109–3912 Phone (617)
918–1389 Fax (617) 918–1291..
John Struble, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor New York, NY
10007 Phone (212) 637–4291 Fax (212) 637–4211.
Janice Bartel, 1650 Arch Street (3HS51) Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103 Phone (215) 814–5394 Fax
(215) 814–3274.
Philip Vorsatz, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL (9T25)
Atlanta, GA 30303–8960 Phone (404) 562–8789 Fax
(404) 562–8788.
Jan Pels, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J) Chicago, Illinois 60604–3507 Phone (312) 886–3009 Fax
(312) 692–2161.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF)
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733 Phone (214) 665–3172
Fax (214) 665–6660.
Susan Klein, 901 N. 5th Street (SUPRSTAR) Kansas
City, Kansas 66101 Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913)
551–9786.
Dan Heffernan, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B) Denver,
CO 80202–1129 Phone (303) 312–7074 Fax (303)
312–6065.
Eugenia Chow, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1) San Francisco, California 94105 Phone (415) 972–3160 Fax
(415) 947–3520.
Deborah Burgess, 300 Desmond Dr., SE, Suite 102
(WOO) Lacey, Washington 98503 Phone (360) 753–
9079 Fax (360) 753–8080.
AmyJean McKeown, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2) Boston, MA 02109–3912 Phone (617)
918–1248 Fax (617) 918–1291
John Struble, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor New York, NY
10007 Phone (212) 637–4291 Fax (212) 637–4211.
2—NJ, NY, PR, VI ...............
3—DE, DC, MD, PA, VA,
WV.
4—AL, FL, GA, KY, MS,
NC, SC, TN.
5—IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI ..
6—AR, LA, NM, OK, TX ......
7—IA, KS, MO, NE ..............
8—CO, MT, ND, SD, UT,
WY.
9—AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU
10—AK, ID, OR, WA ...........
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to OMB review.
Because this action is not subject to
notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedures
Act or any other statute, it is not subject
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or Sections 202 and
205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). In
addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
create new binding legal requirements
that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action does not have significant
Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:33 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Philip Vorsatz 61 Forsyth Street, S.W, 10TH FL (9T25)
Atlanta, GA 30303–8960 Phone (404) 562–8789 Fax
(404) 562–8788.
Jane Neumann 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–4J)
Chicago, Illinois 60604–3507 Phone (312) 353–0123
Fax (312) 697–2649.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF)
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733 Phone (214) 665–3172
Fax (214) 665–6660.
Susan Klein, 901 N. 5th Street (SUPRSTAR) Kansas
City, Kansas 66101 Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913)
551–9798.
Barbara Benoy, 1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR–SA) Denver, CO 80202–1129 Phone (303) 312–6760 Fax
(303) 312–6962.
Glenn Kistner, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1) San Francisco, California 94105 Phone (415) 972–3004 Fax
(415) 947–3520.
Deborah Burgess, 300 Desmond Dr., SE, Suite 102
(WOO) Lacey, Washington 98503 Phone (360) 753–
9079 Fax (360) 753–8080.
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). This action does not involve
technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before
certain actions may take effect, the
agency promulgating the action must
submit a report, which includes a copy
of the action, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the United States. Because this final
action does not contain legally binding
requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 10, 2010.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2010–28825 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9227–2]
Proposed Agreement Pursuant to
Section 122(h)(1) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act for the 76th & Albany Site,
Chicago, IL
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; Request for public
comment on proposed CERCLA
122(h)(1) agreement with the City of
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69992-70001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28825]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9227-5]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2011
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2010 through January 31, 2011, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use of funding, grant mechanisms
and process for awarding funding, the allocation system for
distribution of funding, and terms and reporting under these grants.
EPA has consulted with state and tribal officials in developing this
guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a public record. Another goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase the number of response
actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant current state or tribal
funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to supplement their
funding to increase their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2011, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.3 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of December 1, 2010. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2011.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S. EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at https://www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The U.S. EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566-2892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with actual or perceived
contamination. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional
offices. This document provides guidance that will enable states and
tribes to apply for and use Fiscal Year 2011 Section 128(a) funds.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA Section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA Section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4, 2002,
are also eligible for funding under CERCLA 128(a).
\3\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests for funding will be accepted from December 1, 2010 through
January 31, 2011. Requests received after January 31, 2011 will not be
considered for FY2011 funding. Information required to be submitted
with the funding request is contained in Section IX. States or tribes
that fail to submit the request in the appropriate manner may forfeit
their ability to request funds. First time requestors are strongly
encouraged to contact their Regional Brownfields contacts listed at the
end of Section X, prior to submitting their funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31, 2011 request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final allocation
determinations are made. As in prior years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
128(a) funding in making allocation decisions.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
final cooperative agreement package. For more information, please go to
https://www.grants.gov.
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the Section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance
[[Page 69993]]
Partnership Grants, with the exception of funds used to capitalize a
revolving loan fund for brownfield remediation under section 104(k)(3);
or purchase insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity
pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions
under a State or Tribal response program.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields sites across the country. The
depth and breadth of state and tribal response programs vary. Some
focus on CERCLA related activities, while others are multi-faceted, for
example, addressing sites regulated by both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Many state programs also offer
accompanying financial incentive programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing Section 128(a),\4\ Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal response programs in cleaning up
and redeveloping brownfields sites. Section 128(a) also provides EPA
with an opportunity to strengthen its partnership with states and
tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and establish a public record. The secondary goal is
to provide funding for other activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response
program. This funding is not intended to supplant current state or
tribal funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase their response program's capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out Section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA Section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
1. Demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program,
described Section V; or be a party to voluntary response program
Memorandum of Agreement (VRP MOA) \5\ with EPA; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The legislative history of the Brownfields Amendments
indicates that Congress intended to encourage states and tribes to
enter into MOAs for their voluntary response programs. States or
tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that maintain and make
available a public record are automatically eligible for Section
128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year, see CERCLA Section
128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under Section 128(a), with the exception
of the Section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund under CERCLA 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements--Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements. Achievement of the four
elements should be viewed as a priority. Section 128(a) authorizes
funding for activities necessary to establish and enhance the four
elements and to establish and maintain the public record requirement.
Generally, the four elements are:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites in state or
tribal land. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
enable the state or tribe to establish or enhance a system or process
that will provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely
locations, and the general characteristics of brownfields sites in
their state or tribal lands.
EPA recognizes the varied scope of state and tribal response
programs and will not require states and tribes to develop a ``list''
of brownfields sites. However, at a minimum, the state or tribe should
develop and/or maintain a system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites within their state or tribal
lands.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
have state and tribal response programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms, and resources that are
adequate to ensure that:
a. A response action will protect human health and the environment
and be conducted in accordance with applicable laws; and
b. the necessary response activities are completed if the person
conducting the response activities fails to complete the necessary
response activities (this includes operation and maintenance or long-
term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation.\6\ EPA's goal in funding activities under this
element is to have states and tribes include in their response program
mechanisms and resources for meaningful public participation, at the
local level, including, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Public access to documents and related materials that a state,
tribe, or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing in
making cleanup decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for public comment on cleanup plans
and site activity; and
c. A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfields site--located in the community in which
the person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a cleanup plan and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. EPA's goal in funding
activities under this element is to have states and tribes include in
their response program mechanisms to approve cleanup plans and to
verify that response actions are complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation from the state, the tribe, or a
licensed site professional to the person conducting the response action
that the
[[Page 69994]]
response action is complete. Written approval by a state or tribal
response program official of a proposed cleanup plan is an example of
an approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for Section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, described below, in order to receive funds.
Specifically, under Section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes must:
1. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions have been completed during the previous
year;
2. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions are planned to be addressed in the next
year; and
3. Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``Survey and Inventory'' Element From the
``Public Record''
It is important to note that the public record requirement differs
from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element described in the
``Four Elements'' section above. The public record addresses sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year. In contrast, the ``timely
survey and inventory'' element, described above, refers to a general
approach to identifying brownfields sites.
B. Making the Public Record Easily Accessible
EPA's goal is to enable states and tribes to make the public record
and other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow
states and tribes to use Section 128(a) funding to make the public
record, as well as other information, such as information from the
``survey and inventory'' element, available to the public via the
internet or other means. For example, the Agency would support funding
state and tribal efforts to include detailed location information in
the public record such as the street address and latitude and longitude
information for each site.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For further information on latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA's data standards Web site available at
https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on institutional controls, on a long term
basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has
been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, states or
tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure
long term maintenance of the public record, including information on
institutional controls, in their work plans.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA's institutional controls Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use a cooperative agreement to ``establish or enhance'' their response
programs, including elements of the response program that include
activities related to responses at brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Develop legislation, regulations, procedures, ordinances,
guidance, etc. that would establish or enhance the administrative and
legal structure of their response programs;
Establish and maintain the required public record as
described in Section VI;
EPA considers activities related to maintaining and
monitoring institutional controls to be eligible costs under Section
128(a);
Conduct limited site-specific activities, such as
assessment or cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or
enhance the response program and are tied to the four elements. In
addition to the requirement per CERCLA Section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to
obtain public comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA
strongly encourages states and tribes to seek public input regarding
the priority of sites to be addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste
or other public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and communities with limited experience working with government
agencies. EPA will not provide Section 128(a) funds solely for
assessment or cleanup of specific brownfields sites; site specific
activities must be an incidental part of an overall Section 128(a) work
plan that includes funding for other activities that establish or
enhance the four elements;
Capitalize a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields
cleanup under CERCLA Section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the
same statutory requirements and cooperative agreement terms and
conditions applicable to RLFs awarded under Section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent match on the amount of Section 128(a)
funds used for the RLF, a prohibition on using EPA cooperative
agreement funds for administrative costs relating to the RLF, and a
prohibition on using RLF loans or subgrants for response costs at a
site for which the recipient may be potentially liable under Section
107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions contained in CERCLA Section 104(k)(4)
also apply; or
Purchase environmental insurance or develop a risk-sharing
pool, indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal response program.
B. Uses Related to ``Establishing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA Section 128(a), ``establish'' includes activities
necessary to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or
tribal response program and the public record requirement. For example,
a state or tribal response program may use Section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, or guidance. For more
developed state or tribal response programs, ``establish'' may also
[[Page 69995]]
include activities that keep their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA Section 128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related to ``Enhancing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA Section 128(a), ``enhance'' is related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal response program or increase
the number of sites at which response actions are conducted under a
state or tribal response program.
The exact ``enhancement'' uses that may be allowable depend upon
the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state
or tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that Section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
e.g., Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or Underground
Storage Tanks (USTs). As another example, states and tribal response
programs enhancement activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering and intuitional controls. Other
``enhancement'' uses may be allowable as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
improve state or tribal capacity to increase the number of sites at
which response actions are conducted under the state or tribal response
program. The amount requested for site-specific assessments and
cleanups may not exceed 50% of the total amount of funding requested.
Other eligible uses of funds for site-specific related activities
(i.e., site specific but do not involve conducting actual site
assessments or cleanups) include, but are not limited to, the
following. EPA does not cap the amount of funding applicants may
request for these activities:
Oversight of response action;
technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative
agreement recipients;
development and/or review of quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs);
preparation and submission of Property Profile Forms; and
auditing site cleanups to verify the completion of the
cleanup.
E. Uses Related to Site-Specific Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
In addition to the requirement per CERCLA Section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to
obtain public comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA
strongly encourages states and tribes to seek public input regarding
the priority of sites to be addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste
or other public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote
areas, and communities with limited experience working with government
agencies. EPA will not provide Section 128(a) funds solely for
assessment or cleanup of specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be an incidental part of an overall Section 128(a) work
plan that includes funding for other activities that establish or
enhance the four elements. Site-specific assessments and cleanups must
comply with all applicable laws and are subject to the following
restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or
cleanups at sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at
CERCLA 101(39).
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site can be
funded for assessments with Section 128(a) funds, and no more than
$200,000 per site can be funded for cleanups with Section 128(a) funds.
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded
under this agreement to assess and clean up sites owned or operated by
the recipient.
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
Section 107, except:
[cir] At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance
as defined in CERCLA Section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
[cir] when the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set
forth in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to CERCLA Section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup activities are proposed to be
conducted, except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA Section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. when the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth
in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
F. Costs Incurred for Activities at ``Non-Brownfields'' Sites
Costs incurred for activities at non-brownfields sites, e.g.,
oversight, may be eligible and allowable if such activities are
included in the state's or tribe's work plan. For example, auditing
completed site cleanups in jurisdictions where states or tribes use
licensed site professionals, to verify that sites have been properly
cleaned up, may be an eligible cost under Section 128(a). These costs
need not be incurred in connection with a brownfields site to be
eligible, but must be authorized under the state's or tribe's work plan
to be allowable. Other uses may be eligible and allowable as well,
depending upon the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. However, assessment and cleanup activities may
only be conducted on eligible brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA
Section 101(39).
G. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use Section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance their response programs, even if their response
programs address petroleum contamination. Also, the costs of site-
specific activities, such as site assessments or cleanup at petroleum
contaminated brownfields sites, defined at CERCLA Section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are allowable if the activity is
included in the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a
Brownfields RLF may be used at brownfields sites contaminated by
petroleum to the extent allowed under CERCLA Section 104(k)(3).
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines for 128(A) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA Section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \9\ with a state or
[[Page 69996]]
tribe. The program is administered under the general EPA grant and
cooperative agreement regulations for states, tribes, and local
governments found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 31.
Under these regulations, the cooperative agreement recipient for
Section 128(a) grant program is the government to which a cooperative
agreement is awarded and which is accountable for the use of the funds
provided. The cooperative agreement recipient is the entire legal
entity even if only a particular component of the entity is designated
in the cooperative agreement award document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A cooperative agreement is an assistance agreement to a
state or a tribe that includes substantial involvement of EPA
regional enforcement and program staff during performance of
activities described in the cooperative agreement work plan.
Examples of this involvement include technical assistance and
collaboration on program development and site-specific activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One application per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional offices will negotiate and enter into Section
128(a) cooperative agreements with eligible and interested states or
tribes. EPA will accept only one application from each eligible state
or tribe.
B. Define the state or tribal response program. States and tribes
must define in their work plan the ``Section 128(a) response
program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's primary point of
contact for negotiations on their proposed work plan. When EPA funds
the Section 128(a) cooperative agreement, states and tribes may
distribute these funds among the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the Section 128(a) response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual work plan.
C. Separate cooperative agreements for the capitalization of RLFs
using Section 128(a) funds. If a portion of the 128(a) grant funds
requested will be used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for cleanup,
pursuant to 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative agreements must be
awarded, i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF uses. States and
tribes may, however, submit one initial request for funding,
delineating the RLF as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize an RLF are not eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority to manage a revolving loan fund program. If a state or
tribe chooses to use its 128(a) funds to capitalize a revolving loan
fund program, the state or tribe must have the authority to manage the
program, e.g., issue loans. If the agency/department listed as the
point of contact for the 128(a) cooperative agreement does not have
this authority, it must be able to demonstrate that another state or
tribal agency does have the authority to manage the RLF and is willing
to do so.
E. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements can be part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG). States and tribes may include
Section 128(a) cooperative agreements in their PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004).
Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF or purchase insurance or
develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism
to provide financing for response actions under a state or tribal
response program are not eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project period. EPA regional offices will determine the project
period for each cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years
depending on the regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an
annual work plan.
G. Demonstrating the four elements. As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program includes, or is taking reasonable steps
to include, the four elements described in Section V. EPA will not
fund, in future years, state or tribal response program annual work
plans if EPA determines that these requirements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made. EPA may base this determination
on the information the state or tribe provides to support its work
plan, or on EPA's review of the state or tribal response program.
H. Establishing and maintaining the public record. Prior to funding
a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA regional offices will verify
and document that a public record, as described above, exists and is
being maintained.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For purposes of cooperative agreement funding, the state's
or tribe's public record applies to that state's or tribe's response
program(s) that utilized the Section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. States or tribes that received initial funding prior to FY10:
Requests for FY11 funds will not be accepted from states or tribes that
fail to demonstrate, by the January 31, 2011 request deadline, that
they established and are maintaining a public record. (Note: this would
potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY10 cooperative agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY10 funds prior to meeting public record requirement). States or
tribes in this situation will not be prevented from drawing down their
prior year funds, once the public record requirement is met, but will
be restricted from applying for FY11 funding.
4. States or Tribes that received initial funding in FY10: by the
time of the actual FY11 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate that
they established and maintained the public record (those states and
tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and condition
placed on their FY11 cooperative agreement that prevents the drawdown
of FY11 funds until the public record requirement is met).
5. Recipients receiving funds for the first time in FY11: these
recipients have one year to meet this requirement and may utilize the
128(a) cooperative agreement funds to do so.
I. Demonstration of significant utilization of prior years'
funding. During the allocation process, EPA headquarters places
significant emphasis on the utilization of prior years' funding. Unused
funds from prior years will be considered in the allocation process.
Existing balances in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse could support an
allocation amount below a grantee's request for funding. If a grantee
wishes to avoid an allocation reduction, when submitting a request for
FY11 funds, include a detailed explanation and justification of funds
that remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse from prior years (that
are related to response program activities or brownfield related
activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database Warehouse
to identify the amount of remaining prior year(s) funds. The
cooperative agreement recipient should work, as early as possible, with
both their own finance department, and with their Regional Project
Officer to reconcile any discrepancy between the amount of unspent
funds showing in EPA's system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient's records. The recipient should obtain concurrence from the
Region on the amount of unspent funds requiring justification by the
deadline for this request for funding.
J. Explanation of proposed activity/task that would require an
increase from the FY10 funding amount. Due to the limited amount of
funding available, recipients must demonstrate the environmental
benefits of undertaking the proposed activity/task and how that
activity/task supports the four elements of a response program in
addition to highlighting any activities in local communities,
especially potential environmental justice communities, communities
with a health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and
[[Page 69997]]
communities with limited experience working with government agencies.
Refer to Section IX for information to be submitted with funding
request.
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Fund
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
Please refer to process flow chart below:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.026
For Fiscal Year 2011, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.3 million per state or tribe. This limit may be changed
in future years based on appropriation amounts and demand for funding.
Please note the CERCLA 128(a) annual program's budget has remained
static while demand for funding continues to increase every year.\11\
Therefore, in most instances the FY11 state and tribal individual
funding amounts will not meet the FY10 funding amounts. Requests for
increases over the FY10 funding amount will be considered only after
allocations are made to cover basic core support to programs of all
eligible requestors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ FY10 EPA received $67.1 Million in requests for funding
from States and Tribes under CERCLA 128(a). The FY10 enacted budget
was $49.5 Million. The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$17 Million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the January 31, 2011 request deadline, regional offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA headquarters.
Before submitting requests to EPA headquarters, regional offices may
take into account additional factors when determining recommended
allocation amounts. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the
depth and breadth of the state or tribal program; scope of the
perceived need for the funding, e.g., size of state or tribal
jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of prior funding, and funds remaining from prior years,
etc.
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate funds accordingly.
IX. Information To Be Submitted With the Funding Request
A. Demonstration of significant utilization of prior years' funding
States and tribes requesting 128(a) FY11 funds must submit the
following information, as applicable, to their regional contact on or
before January 31, 2011 (regions may request additional information, as
needed):
For those states and tribes with prior Targeted
Brownfields Assessment funding awarded under CERCLA 104(d), provide, by
agreement number, the amount of funds that have not been requested for
reimbursement (i.e., those funds that remain in EPA's Financial Data
Warehouse). EPA will take into account these funds in the allocation
process. A cooperative agreement recipient can choose to provide a
justification to EPA that explains why the underused funds should not
be considered in the current request for funding.
For those states and tribes that received FY08 or prior
Section 128(a) funds, you must provide the amount of FY03, FY04, FY05,
FY06 FY07 and/or FY08 funds that have not been requested for
reimbursement (i.e., those funds that remain in EPA's Financial Data
Warehouse). EPA will take into account these funds in the allocation
process.
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY11 Funding
All states and tribes requesting FY11 funds must submit a summary
of the planned use of the funds with associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the following format below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY10 FY11
Funding use Awarded Requested Summary of intended use (example uses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or Enhance the four elements:........ $XX,XXX $XX,XXX .......................................
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields .......... .......... 1. Examples:
sites;. inventory and prioritize
brownfields sites.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or .......... .......... 2. Examples:
other mechanisms;. develop/enhance ordinances,
regulations, procedures for response
programs.
[[Page 69998]]
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide .......... .......... 3. Examples:
meaningful opportunities for public develop a community
participation;. involvement process.
fund an outreach coordinator.
issue public notices of site
activities.
develop a process to seek
public input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote areas, and communities with
limited experience working with
government agencies to prioritize
sites to be addressed.
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup plan and .......... .......... 4. Examples:
verification and certification that cleanup is review cleanup plans and
complete.. verify completed actions.
Establish and Maintain the Public Record....... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX maintain public record.
create web site for public
record.
disseminate public information
on how to access the public record.
Enhance the Response Program................... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX provide oversight of site
assessments and cleanups.
attend training and
conferences on brownfields cleanup
technologies & other brownfields
topics.
update and enhance program
management activities.
negotiate/oversee contracts
for response programs.
enhance program management &
tracking systems.
prepare Property Profile Forms/
input data into ACRES database.
Site-specific Activities (amount requested $XX,XXX $XX,XXX perform site assessments and
should be incidental to the workplan, e.g., cleanups.
less than half of the total funding requested develop QAPPs.
see Section VII.D for more information on what prepare Property Profile Forms/
activities should be considered when input data into ACRES database for
calculating site specific activities.). these sites.
Environmental Insurance........................ $XX,XXX $XX,XXX review potential uses of
environmental insurance.
Revolving Loan Fund............................ $XX,XXX $XX,XXX create a cleanup revolving
loan fund.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Funding.............................. $XXX,XXX $XXX,XXX Performance Partnership Grant? Yes
[ballot] No [ballot]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Explanation of proposed activity/task that would require an increase
from the FY10 funding amount
For those states and tribes requesting amounts above their FY10
allocation, a separate explanation must be provided using the format
below or the explanation can be made in a narrative form. The request
should clearly demonstrate the environmental benefits of the proposed
activity/task and how it directly supports the establishment and
enhancement of the four elements of a response program. Requests for
increases over the FY10 funding amount will be considered only after
allocations are made to cover basic core support to programs of all
eligible requestors. Please note the CERCLA 128(a) annual program's
budget has remained static while demand for funding continues to
increase every year.\12\ Therefore, in most instances the FY11 state
and tribal individual funding amounts will not meet the FY10 funding
amounts. Increases in funding are unlikely.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ FY10 EPA received $67.1 Million in requests for funding
from States and Tribes under CERCLA 128(a). The FY10 enacted budget
was $49.5 Million. The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$17 Million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explanation of request(s) for funding One time \13\ request or Explanation/anticipated
above FY10 award level Amount recurring? outcome
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Establish or Enhance the four elements: $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
1. Timely survey and inventory of Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
brownfields sites; 2. Oversight and Anticipated Outcome:
enforcement authorities or other
mechanisms; 3. Mechanisms and resources
to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation; and/or 4.
Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup
plan and verification and certification
that cleanup is complete.
Establish and Maintain the Public Record $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Enhance the Response Program............ $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Site-specific Activities (amount $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
requested should be incidental to the Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
workplan, e.g., less than half of the Anticipated Outcome:
total funding requested).
[[Page 69999]]
Environmental Insurance................. $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Revolving Loan Fund..................... $XX,XXX One Time [ballot]......... Explanation of
Recurring [ballot]........ environmental benefits
Anticipated Outcome:
Total Increase Requested............ $XX,XXX .......................... ..........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ A one time request is not likely to repeat whereas a recurring charge is likely to periodically occur
again.
D. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2011, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2010). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate ``N/A''):
Number of properties enrolled in the response program
supported by the CERCLA 128(a) funding.
Number of properties that received a ``No Further Action''
(NFA) documentation or a Certificate of Completion (COC) or equivalent,
AND have all required institutional controls in place.
Number of properties that received an NFA or COC or
equivalent and do NOT have all required institutional controls in
place.
Total number of acres associated with properties in the
second bullet above.
(OPTIONAL) Number of properties where assistance was
provided, but the property was NOT enrolled in the response program.
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities. Each of the subsections below summarizes
the basic terms and conditions and related reporting that will be
required if a cooperative agreement with EPA is awarded.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40, state and tribes must provide
progress reports as provided in the terms and conditions of the
cooperative agreement negotiated with EPA regional offices. State and
tribal costs for complying with reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a) cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must include both a narrative
discussion and performance data relating to the state's or tribe's
accomplishments and environmental outputs associated with the approved
budget and workplan and should provide an accounting of section 128(a)
funding. If applicable, the state or tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or enhancing the four elements of
the state's or tribe's response program. All recipients must provide
information relating to establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record. Depending upon the activities included
in the state's or tribe's work plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for environmental insurance must report:
[cir] Number and description of insurance policies purchased (e.g.,
type of coverage provided; dollar limits of coverage; any buffers or
deductibles; category and identity of insured persons; premium; first
dollar or umbrella; site specific or blanket; occurrence or claims
made, etc.)
[cir] The number of sites covered by the insurance
[cir] The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance (e.g.,
amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance premiums)
[cir] The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders
2. Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database for each site assessment
and cleanup. In addition, recipients must report how they provide the
affected community with prior notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA Section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed
cleanup plans and site activities. For example, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies.
3. Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for other site-specific related
activities must include a description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For
example:
[cir] Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups.
[cir] Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted.
[cir] Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities.
[cir] Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities.
4. Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients with work plans that include
funding for revolving loan fund (RLF) must include the information
required by the terms and conditions for progress reporting under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
5. Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without
a VRP MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing
the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
[cir] A narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements);
[[Page 70000]]
policies and procedures to implement legal authorities;
and other mechanisms;
[cir] a description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
[cir] a narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] a response action will protect human health and the
environment; and be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and
state law; and if the person conducting the response action fails to
complete the necessary response activities, including operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response
activities are completed; and
[cir] a narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request other information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2011, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2010). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer (if no activity occurred in the
particular category, indicate a ``N/A''):
Number of properties enrolled in the response program
supported by the CERCLA section 128(a) funding.
Number of properties that received a ``No Further Action''
(NFA) documentation or a Certificate of Completion (COC) or equivalent,
AND have all required institutional controls in place.
Number of properties that received an NFA or COC or
equivalent and do NOT have all required institutional controls in
place.
Total number of acres associated with properties in the
second bullet above.
(OPTIONAL) Number of properties where assistance was
provided, but the property was NOT enrolled in the response program.
Where applicable, EPA may require states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the four elements which can be
aggregated for national reporting to Congress.
For example:
1. Timely Survey & Inventory--Estimated number of brownfields sites
in the state or on tribal land.
2. Oversight & Enforcement Authorities/Mechanisms--Number of active
cleanups and percentage that received oversight; percentage of active
cleanups not in compliance with the cleanup workplan and that received
communications from recipient regarding non-compliance.
3. Public Participation--Percentage of sites in the response
program where public meetings/notices were conducted regarding the
cleanup plan and/or other site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests.
4. Cleanup Approval/Certification Mechanisms--Total number of ``no
further action'' letters or total number of certificate of completions.
(NOTE: where applicable, this reporting requirement may include
activities not funded with CERCLA Section 128(a) monies, because this
information may be used by EPA to evaluate whether recipients without
MOAs have met or are taking reasonable steps to meet the four elements
of a response program pursuant to CERCLA Section 128(a)(2).)
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as specified in the terms and
conditions of their cooperative agreement, information related to
establishing or, if already established, maintaining the public record,
described above. States and tribes can refer to an already existing
public record, e.g., Web site or other public database to meet the
public record requirement. Recipients reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record a. exists and is up-to-date b. is
adequate. A public record may include the following information:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed
including:
Date the response action was completed.
Site name.
Name of owner at time of cleanup, if known.
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude).
Whether an institutional control is in place.
Explain the type of institutional control in place (e.g.,
deed restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries
of contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.)
Nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants, or pollutants, petroleum contamination, etc.)
Size of the site in acres.
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known.
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude).
To the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place.
Explain the type of the institutional control in place
(e.g., deed restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.)
To the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.)
Size of the site in acres.
D. Award administration information
1. Subaward and executive compensation reporting
Applicants must ensure that they have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an exception from the
requirements, should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these requirements under OMB guidance at 2 CFR
Part 25 (e.g., individuals), applicants must:
a. Be registered in the CCR prior to submitting an application or
proposal under this announcement. CCR information can be found at:
https://www.bpn.gov/ccr/.
b. Maintain an active CCR registration with current information at
all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application
or proposal under consideration by an agency, and
c. Provide its DUNS number in each application or proposal it
submits to the agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS number, at no
cost, by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 1-
866-705-5711, or visiting the D&B Web site at: https://www.dnb.com.
If an applicant fails to comply with these requirements, it will,
should it be
[[Page 70001]]
selected for award, affect their ability to receive the award.
3. Use of funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is
expected to manage assistance agreement funds efficiently and
effectively and make sufficient progress towards completing the project
activities described in the work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
Regional State and Tribal Brownfields Contacts
------------------------------------