Modification of Class B Airspace; Charlotte, NC, 69864-69870 [2010-28399]
Download as PDF
69864
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding
a new airworthiness directive to read as
follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
■
2010–18–52 MD Helicopters, Inc.:
Amendment 39–16515. Docket No.
FAA–2010–1126; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–078–AD. Supersedes
Emergency AD 2010–18–51, Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–076–AD.
Applicability: Model MD900 helicopters,
with lower main rotor hub (hub), part
number 900R2101008–103, -105, and -107,
installed, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To detect a crack in the hub and prevent
the failure of the hub and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter, do the following:
(a) Within 4 hours time-in-service, visually
inspect the hub for a crack, paying particular
attention to the area of the 5 flex beam bolt
hole locations. If you find a crack, before
further flight, replace the hub with an
airworthy hub.
(b) If you find a crack, within 10 days,
report the finding to Roger Durbin, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, Airframe Branch, e-mail
Roger.Durbin@faa.gov or fax (562) 627–5210.
(c) A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to
this collection of information are mandatory.
Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20591, Attn: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, AES–200.
(d) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, ATTN:
Roger Durbin, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Airframe Branch, 3960 Paramount Blvd.,
Lakewood, California 90712, telephone (562)
627–5233, fax (562) 627–5210, for
information about previously approved
alternative methods of compliance.
(e) The Joint Aircraft System/Component
(JASC) Code is 6220: Main Rotor Head.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
(f) This amendment becomes effective on
December 1, 2010, to all persons except those
persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2010–18–52,
issued August 23, 2010, which contained the
requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November
5, 2010.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–28456 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0049; Airspace
Docket No. 08–AWA–1]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Class B Airspace;
Charlotte, NC
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies the
Charlotte, NC, Class B airspace area to
ensure the containment of aircraft,
accommodate the implementation of
area navigation (RNAV) departure
procedures, and support operations of
the third parallel runway at Charlotte/
Douglas International Airport. The FAA
is taking this action to improve the flow
of air traffic, enhance safety, and reduce
the potential for midair collision in the
Charlotte, NC, terminal area.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC,
January 13, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
3 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Systems and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On March 3, 2010, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify
the Charlotte, NC Class B airspace area
(75 FR 9538). This action proposed to
expand the lateral and vertical limits of
the Charlotte Class B airspace area: To
provide the additional airspace needed
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to support operations of a third parallel
runway and the implementation of
RNAV departure procedures; to contain
ILS approach procedures for runways
23, 18L, 18C (formerly 18R but
redesignated November 20, 2008) and
the new runway (18R); and to contain
aircraft being vectored to a base leg from
the west when Charlotte/Douglas
International Airport (CLT) is on a north
operation.
In addition, the FAA published in the
Federal Register a correction to the
notice to provide a graphic chart of the
proposed area that was inadvertently
omitted from notice (75 FR 13049;
March 18, 2010). Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal. Twelve written
comments were received in response to
the notice.
Discussion of Comments
Two commenters expressed concerns
about the availability of the published
low altitude area navigation (RNAV)
routes (i.e., T-routes) through the
Charlotte terminal area. One commenter
wrote that he regularly flies east/west
across North Carolina but seldom is
cleared for a T-route. Another
commenter said that the FAA should reevaluate and potentially amend the
Charlotte T-routes if necessary to
increase availability.
There are currently four T-routes that
traverse Charlotte’s terminal airspace.
T–200 and T–202 are east/west oriented
routes; and T–201 and T–203 are north/
south routes. The FAA acknowledges
that availability of the east/west Troutes is limited. When the new runway
36L/18R opened in November 2009 and
in order to accommodate triple
instrument operations, Charlotte airport
traffic control tower (ATCT) restricted
overflight traffic on V–66, T–200 and
T–202 during certain times. This
restriction is in place when Charlotte is
on a north operation (i.e., aircraft
landing and departing to the north). The
FAA has reviewed the existing T-routes
and found that it is difficult to utilize
the east/west T-routes through the
Charlotte terminal area more than the
current practice. When Charlotte is on a
north operation, final radar airspace
begins at Charlotte airport and extends
southward to the boundary with
Columbia, SC, ATCT airspace. On a
south operation, final radar airspace
begins at the airport and extends
northward to the boundary with Atlanta
Air Route Traffic Control Center
(ARTCC). Because traffic in the above
mentioned areas is descending from the
enroute structure all the way to the
surface for landing, it is difficult to
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
provide additional T-routes through
these areas. This is likely to continue
because, since June 2009, there has been
a five percent increase in traffic at the
Charlotte airport, with traffic projected
to continue to increase at a moderate
rate. It should be noted that controllers
do not normally ‘‘offer’’ T-routes to
pilots when they are approaching
Charlotte airspace. When these routes
were first developed, it was the
expectation that pilots would file the Troutes in their flight plan. When the Troute is not filed in the flight plan and
a pilot subsequently requests clearance
into a T-route, controllers must re-clear
the aircraft off the filed route and onto
the T-route and amend the pilot’s route
in the National Airspace System (NAS).
This could lead to confusion as to where
the route begins and ends, and where
the route leaves or rejoins the
previously filed route. It should also be
noted that the two north/south oriented
T-routes through Charlotte’s airspace
remain available with very few
restrictions. Any limitations imposed on
those routes would be based on realtime traffic. If pilots wish to file a Troute in the flight plan, Charlotte
controllers will make every attempt to
allow the pilot to remain on the route.
Five persons wrote with concerns
about expanding the part of the Class B
airspace (with a 4,000 foot MSL floor)
over Lancaster County-McWhirter Field
(LKR), located in Lancaster, South
Carolina. They contend that the change
would cause the loss of, or modification
to, an approved Aerobatic Practice Area
(APA) at LKR. The APA is used by
many members of the International
Aerobatic Club and a number of
aerobatic teams train there. The APA
currently extends from 500 feet above
ground level (AGL) to 4,000 feet AGL,
and operates in accordance with a
waiver granted by the FAA.
Commenters contend that the Class B
airspace floor is set at 4,000 feet MSL in
this area as proposed, the APA would
extend nearly 500 feet into Class B
airspace. They note that the APA ceiling
could be lowered to 3,500 feet AGL, but
this would allow only a 14 foot margin
below the Class B for pilots to avoid an
airspace violation. Commenters
suggested that the Class B floor over
LKR be raised to at least 5,000 feet MSL
to allow them to fly safely while
practicing competitive aerobatics.
The FAA recognizes that establishing
a 4,000 foot MSL Class B airspace floor
would place the ceiling of LKR’s APA
within Class B airspace. However,
FAA’s facility operation directive (FAA
Order 7210.3, Facility Operation and
Administration) specifically addresses
aerobatic practice areas and provides a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
means for air traffic managers to
accommodate aerobatic practice activity
within Class B airspace. Based on the
guidelines stated in the directive, the
FAA believes it can work out a
satisfactory arrangement with the
aerobatic operators at LKR.
Also, one of the commenters
questioned the need for Charlotte
arrivals from the southeast and the west
to be at 3,500 feet AGL when 30 nautical
miles (NM) from the Charlotte airport.
The FAA has carefully considered the
Class B airspace configuration in this
area. The proposal to extend Class B
airspace over LKR with a floor of 4,000
feet MSL was based on procedures
required for managing arrivals and
departures using runway 36R. Runway
36R is used for all east and southbound
departures. In addition, runway 36R is
used for both departure and arrival
traffic to avoid extensive taxi and
runway crossing requirements. General
aviation, corporate and military traffic
departing from and arriving to, the fixed
base operator and Air National Guard
areas on the airport are often assigned
runway 36R. Assigning this traffic to
runway 36R enhances efficiency
because that runway is closest to those
ramps and parking areas. This practice
keeps runway crossings to a minimum,
which reduces the potential for runway
incursions and greatly enhances the
safety of aircraft movement on the
airport surface areas. Arrivals to runway
36R often require at least four nautical
miles (NM) in-trail spacing. This is
necessary to provide space for runway
36R departures to depart safely between
arrivals. In-trail spacing of greater than
four NM is required for wake turbulence
considerations when the preceding
aircraft is a heavy jet or if the weight
class difference between the leading and
trailing aircraft meet certain criteria.
Both the in-trail spacing required for
departures and the in-trail spacing
required for wake turbulence contribute
to the lengthening of the final approach
course. Therefore, it is not uncommon
for the final approach course to extend
to a point adjacent to LKR.
Additionally, the initial approach
altitude for traffic conducting the ILS
runway 36R approach is 4,000 feet MSL.
During triple simultaneous ILS
operations (runways 36R, 36C and 36L)
the following altitude assignments are
used: Runway 36R—4,000 feet MSL;
runway 36C—8,000 feet MSL; and
runway 36L—5,000 or 6,000 feet MSL.
FAA separation standards for triple ILS
approaches require that arriving aircraft
be vertically separated by a minimum of
1,000 feet until they are established
inbound on the ILS final approach
course (localizer). Based on the above,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69865
the FAA concluded that the 4,000 foot
MSL floor is needed to provide adequate
Class B airspace for these aircraft
operations.
Two commenters wrote that the
expansion of Class B airspace by adding
Area J would significantly impact
general aviation and sky diving
operations at Chester Catawba Regional
Airport (DCM), in Chester, SC. The new
Area J lies to the south of the Charlotte
airport between the 25 NM and 30 NM
arcs of the Charlotte VOR/DME. It
extends from 4,000 feet MSL up to
10,000 feet MSL. While DCM currently
lies outside the Charlotte Class B
airspace area, the new Area J would
overlie the airport.
The FAA does not agree that the new
Area J would cause significant impact
on DCM operations. The instrument
procedures serving the airport are still
available and airport VFR traffic
patterns are not affected by the
expanded Class B airspace. The sky dive
operations will continue to be
accommodated at DCM. Charlotte ATCT
is working with the operators of
SkyDive Carolina to develop a mutually
satisfactory Letter of Agreement (LOA)
governing those operations. The LOA
will standardize the handling of jump
aircraft at DCM and provide a workable
solution that will mitigate the concerns
of both parties.
One commenter questioned the
validity of the reason stated in the
notice for lowering Class B airspace to
4,000 feet MSL in that area. The NPRM
stated that when Charlotte is on a north
operation, a significant number of
aircraft inbound from the southwest on
either the UNARM ONE or ADENA
TWO standard terminal arrival routes
(STAR) exit and reenter Class B airspace
between the current 6,000 foot MSL
Class B airspace floor and the 4,600 foot
MSL floor to the south-southwest of
Charlotte. The commenter questioned
this reasoning because the two STARs
never get closer than nine NM to DCM.
The commenter suggested that a two
NM cutout of Class B airspace centered
on DCM would permit unhampered
operations at DCM while containing
aircraft inbound to CLT within Class B
airspace.
The FAA does not agree with the
suggestion for a two NM Class B
airspace cutout around DCM. If the
airspace over DCM is not contained
within Class B airspace, it would be
necessary for controllers to direct
aircraft to the north or south of DCM.
This would greatly increase controller
workload and frequency congestion
while decreasing efficiency. The FAA
finds that any Class B airspace cutout of
usable size or shape would require
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
69866
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
extensive vectoring of aircraft to remain
in Class B airspace.
In response to the above mentioned
comment that the UNARM and ADENA
STARs never get closer than nine NM to
DCM, it is true when Charlotte is on a
south operation using runways 18R,
18C, 18L and 23 for landing. However,
when Charlotte is on a north operation,
traffic is vectored off the UNARM and
ADENA STARs almost immediately
upon entering Charlotte ATCT’s area of
jurisdiction. This traffic is then assigned
an easterly heading for vectors to the
runway 36L, 36C or 36R final approach
course. A review of radar-derived plots
of actual flight patterns used on a north
operation clearly show that DCM is
overflown by aircraft assigned these
base leg vectors.
Two commenters asked the FAA to
consider lowering the current 10,000
foot MSL ceiling of the Charlotte Class
B airspace area to 7,000 feet MSL. One
commenter stated that there is no
requirement for Class B airspace to
extend to 10,000 feet MSL and cited
other Class B locations (New York,
Philadelphia and Boston) that currently
have a 7,000 foot ceiling. The
commenter believes that reducing the
Charlotte Class B airspace ceiling would
allow nonparticipating aircraft to
transition the area with greater ease,
reducing pilot and controller workloads.
The FAA does not agree with the
commenters requests. Class B design
guidelines state that the upper limit of
Class B airspace normally should not
exceed 10,000 feet MSL. However, Class
B airspace dimensions are individually
tailored to site-specific requirements. To
illustrate this, there are 30 Class B
airspace areas (covering 37 primary
airports). Of these areas, 13 have Class
B ceilings at 10,000 feet MSL; 5 areas
have 7,000 foot ceilings; 6 areas at 8,000
feet; 3 areas at 9,000 feet; and 3 areas
have ceilings above 10,000 feet MSL. In
the case of the Charlotte Class B
airspace area, the FAA determined that
lowering the Class B ceiling from 10,000
feet to 7,000 feet MSL would not
provide adequate Class B airspace for
aircraft operating into and out of the
Charlotte airport. Specifically, Charlotte
procedures and letters of agreement
with adjacent ARTCCs require arriving
turbojet and high performance
turboprop aircraft enter Charlotte
ATCT’s area of jurisdiction at altitudes
between 10,000 feet and 13,000 feet
MSL. Once inside Charlotte ATCT’s area
of jurisdiction, this arrival traffic is
assigned an altitude of 9,000 feet until
abeam the Charlotte airport (for
downwind traffic). Turbojet departures
are assigned an initial altitude of 8,000
feet. Frequently, the arrivals at 9,000
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
feet and the departures at 8,000 feet
‘‘cross out’’ within 20 NM of the
Charlotte airport. By lowering the Class
B ceiling to 7,000 feet as suggested,
uncontrolled VFR aircraft, not in
communication with ATC, would be
added to this mix of cross-out traffic.
This situation would not provide
adequate protection to the arrivals,
departures and VFR aircraft operating in
a congested airspace area as they
transition to and from the enroute
structure.
One commenter wrote about problems
encountered when departing IFR
northeastbound from the Lake Norman
Airpark (14A), Mooresville, NC, to
Greensboro, NC. The commenter, who
flies a high-performance, single-engine
turboprop aircraft, said he was directed
to fly at 3,000 feet southeastbound for
325 miles in order to go northeast bound
to Greensboro, NC. In addition, when
flying northbound from Columbia, SC,
to 14A, the commenter stated he is
required to fly the arrival from Florence,
SC to 14A, which is a considerable
deviation. The commenter also
requested that the FAA establish IFR
routes to the north through Charlotte
airspace.
The FAA is not aware of any aircraft
that are vectored 325 miles off course.
In fact, the longest radius the Charlotte
ATCT facility controls from Charlotte
Airport is less than 60 miles. Traffic
departing Lake Norman Airpark with a
destination of Greensboro Airport (GSO)
should be able to proceed initially at an
altitude of 3,000 feet, and then receive
a climb clearance to a higher altitude
within 15–20 miles (in a worst-case
scenario). This would normally only
occur if Charlotte were using a triple
parallel simultaneous ILS approach,
south operation, which occurs very
infrequently (less than 5% of
operations). If Charlotte were on a south
converging operation (approximately
55% of the time) the aircraft in question
should be able to climb to at least 5,000
feet within 10 miles of the Lake Norman
Airpark, and then continue to climb to
the pilot’s requested altitude. If
Charlotte is on a north operation
(approximately 40% of operations) this
aircraft should normally be assigned its
final requested altitude within 10 miles
of the Lake Norman Airpark. As is the
case with most high density terminal
areas, all high performance turbinepowered aircraft are assigned specific
STARs. In the case of Charlotte, these
STARs are arranged in a four-corner
‘‘bedpost’’ configuration. Therefore, high
performance traffic from the Columbia,
SC, Airport would be routed by the
surrounding ARTCCs via either the
UNARM or Chesterfield (or equivalent
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RNAV) STARs. If the traffic is not high
performance (turbine powered) it could
proceed virtually direct at an altitude of
at or below 7,000 feet. Depending on
traffic volume, low-performance aircraft
could expect to be vectored 15 to 20
miles east or west of Charlotte airport to
avoid congestion during busy periods.
Regarding the request to establish IFR
routes north through Charlotte airspace,
there are two north-south RNAV Troutes (T–201 and T–203) through the
Charlotte Class B airspace area. RNAV
route T–203 extends between Columbia,
SC (CAE) and Pulaski, VA (PSK)
transiting through the west side of the
Charlotte Class B airspace area. In
addition, VOR Federal airway V–37 is a
north-south route through the Class B
airspace area.
Three commenters from the Lancaster
County, SC, area were concerned with
noise and environmental issues. They
argue that there would be an increase in
noise from extending the Charlotte Class
B airspace area that would affect
lifestyle, wildlife and property values in
the area. They questioned the need for
aircraft to fly so low over Lancaster, SC,
which is 40 miles from Charlotte
Airport. They suggested that aircraft fly
no lower than 5,000 feet over the area.
The purpose of Class B airspace is to
reduce the potential for midair
collisions in the airspace surrounding
airports with high density air traffic
operations. All aircraft operating in
Class B airspace are subject to certain
operating rules and equipment
requirements. Class B airspace ensures
that all aircraft flying in close proximity
to high-performance, turbine-powered
aircraft are under the guidance and
control of an Air Traffic Control (ATC)
facility. Aircraft flight paths are dictated
by many factors including, but not
limited to: the direction of operation at
the Charlotte Airport; weather
conditions, which determine the type of
approaches being conducted; and traffic
volume, which determines how long the
final approach course is, as well as the
base leg and downwind flight paths of
aircraft. At Charlotte Airport, traffic
volume varies with the time of day and,
to some extent, the day of the week.
As discussed above in response to a
previous comment, ATC procedures
require that aircraft must be assigned
non-conflicting altitudes. During triple
parallel ILS operations, ATC assigns
altitudes that are at least 1,000 feet apart
to ensure separation between aircraft
being vectored ‘‘head-on’’ to adjacent
final approach courses. This is why
aircraft using runways 36R and 36L are
assigned 4,000 feet and 5,000 feet
respectively. The use of the 4,000-foot
altitude over the Lancaster area has been
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
in place for several years (It should be
noted that the previous required altitude
was 3,600 feet).
Because of the extensive use of
runway 36R for departures, arriving
aircraft must be spaced further apart to
provide room for aircraft awaiting take
off to be sequenced between aircraft that
are landing. This means that, during
heavy departure periods, the final
approach course for traffic landing on
runway 36R often extends 25 to 30
miles from the airport. This places
much of this traffic over the Lancaster,
SC, area at an assigned altitude of 4,000
feet. The expansion of the Charlotte
Class B airspace area will provide Class
B protection for these aircraft operating
at 4,000 feet.
If 5,000 feet is used as the floor of
Class B airspace in the vicinity of
Lancaster, SC, it will require traffic
assigned to runway 36L to operate no
lower than 6,000 feet in order to meet
the 1,000 foot vertical separation
requirement. If traffic using runway 36L
joins the final approach course at 6,000
feet instead of 5,000 feet, it would drive
the final approach course out further
from the airport. This could hamper the
controller’s flexibility in providing an
orderly and expeditious flow of traffic
because less room would be available
for vectoring, sequencing and spacing
traffic.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
to modify the Charlotte, NC, Class B
airspace area. This action (depicted on
the attached chart) expands the lateral
and vertical limits of the Charlotte Class
B airspace area to provide the additional
airspace needed to: ensure the
containment aircraft within Class B
airspace as required by FAA directives;
support the operations of a third parallel
runway (18R/36L); and, accommodate
RNAV departure procedures. The
modifications to the Charlotte Class B
airspace area are summarized below:
Area A that extends from the surface
to and including 10,000 feet MSL is
unchanged by this rule.
Area B that extends from 1,800 feet
MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL is modified
by expanding a part of Area B north of
the Charlotte Airport from the current
11 NM arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME
(CLT) outward to the 14 NM arc. This
expansion of Area B is made only from
the point of intersection of the CLT 14
NM arc and Highway 321, then
clockwise along the 14 NM arc to the
CLT 024°T radial. At that point, Area B
reverts to the existing 11 NM arc. The
purpose of this change is to ensure that
arrivals to runways 18R, 18C and 18L
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
are contained within Class B airspace
throughout the approach. In addition,
the cutout around the Gastonia
Municipal Airport (AKH) is widened to
facilitate better access to and from the
airport.
Area C is that airspace extending
upward from 3,600 feet MSL to and
including 10,000 feet MSL that lies to
the north of Area B. Additionally, the
northeast edge of Area C is moved from
the current CLT 20 NM arc outward to
the 23 NM arc. This change extends the
3,600 foot Class B airspace floor by 3
NM to the northeast to accommodate
vectoring patterns and the descent
profile of aircraft conducting the ILS
RWY 23 approach.
Area D is redescribed as a small area
located east of the Charlotte Airport,
(south of Area C and east of Area B) that
extends from 5,000 feet MSL up to
10,000 feet MSL. The modified Area D
lowers Class B airspace from 6,000 feet
MSL to 5,000 feet MSL in order to
contain aircraft flying easterly RNAV
departure procedures within Class B
airspace during climbout.
Area E is redescribed as that airspace
from 3,600 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet
MSL, located to the south of Area B. The
modified Area E extends the 3,600 foot
Class B airspace floor southward to the
CLT 25 NM arc. This will provide
adequate vectoring airspace and ensure
that aircraft will be retained within
Class B airspace.
Area F is redescribed as that airspace
extending from 4,000 feet MSL to 10,000
feet MSL. The modified Area F is
located southwest of AKH within an
area bounded by Highway 321, the CLT
20 NM arc and power lines that extend
in a southwesterly direction west of
AKH. This area provides an adequate
vector area for runway 5 arrivals.
Area G is a new area extending from
5,000 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL
located generally northwest of AKH.
Area G consists of that airspace within
an area bounded by the power lines, the
CLT 20 NM arc, and Highway 321.
Along with Area F, Area G provides
airspace to prevent aircraft departing on
westerly tracks from exiting and
reentering Class B airspace during
climbout.
Area H is a new area extending from
4,000 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL
in the northernmost section of the
Charlotte Class B airspace area. This
area extends the 4,000 foot floor of Class
B airspace out to the CLT 30 NM arc,
north of the airport. This extension is
needed to provide adequate airspace
needed for separation and vectoring
arrivals to the appropriate final
approach course; to comply with
simultaneous triple ILS procedures;
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69867
and, to ensure aircraft remain within
Class B airspace.
Area I is a new segment defining the
easternmost section of the Class B
airspace area. Area I extends from 6,000
feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL. This
segment lowers the floor of Class B
airspace from 8,000 feet MSL to 6,000
feet MSL within that area from Highway
601 eastward to the CLT 25 NM. The
rest of Area I retains the current 6,000
foot MSL floor. These changes ensure
arrivals and departures do not exit and
reenter Class B airspace.
Area J is a new area directly south of
Area E. Area J extends Class B airspace,
with a 4,000 foot MSL floor, southward
between the CLT 25 NM arc and the
CLT 30 NM arc. This expands the 4,000
foot floor of Class B airspace out to the
CLT 30 NM arc, south of the airport.
This extension is needed to provide
adequate airspace needed for separation
and vectoring arrivals to the appropriate
final approach course; to comply with
simultaneous triple ILS procedures;
and, to ensure that aircraft remain
within Class B airspace.
Area K is a new segment defining the
westernmost section of the Class B
airspace area. Area K extends from
6,000 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL.
This segment lowers the floor of Class
B airspace from 8,000 feet MSL to 6,000
feet MSL within the area between the
CLT 20 NM arc and the CLT 25 NM arc
(west of the Charlotte Airport). Area K
also extends Class B airspace southward
to abut Area J. The rest of the airspace
in Area K retains the current 6,000 foot
MSL floor.
Finally, the Charlotte/Douglas
International Airport reference point
coordinates in the Class B airspace legal
description are changed from lat.
35°12′52″ N., long. 80°56′36″ W., to
35°12′49″ N., long. 80°56′57″ W., to
reflect the latest National Airspace
System data.
The above changes to the Charlotte
Class B airspace area are needed to
ensure the containment of IFR aircraft
within Class B airspace as required by
FAA directives; accommodate the
implementation of RNAV departure
procedures; and support operations of a
third parallel runway.
All radials listed in the Charlotte
Class B airspace description in this rule
are stated in degrees relative to True
North.
Class B airspace areas are published
in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order JO
7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010 and
effective September 15, 2010 which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class B airspace area in this
document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
69868
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph
311a. This airspace action is not
expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. We
have determined that there is no new
information collection requirement
associated with this final rule.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Evaluation Summary
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 directs that
each Federal agency shall propose or
adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires agencies to prepare a written
assessment of the costs, benefits, and
other effects of proposed or final rules
that include a Federal mandate likely to
result in the expenditure by State, local,
or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more annually (adjusted for inflation
with base year of 1995). This portion of
the preamble summarizes the FAA’s
analysis of the economic impacts of this
final rule. Department of Transportation
Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification,
analysis, and review of regulations. If
the expected cost impact is so minimal
that a proposed or final rule does not
warrant a full evaluation, this order
permits that a statement to that effect
and the basis for it be included in the
preamble if a full regulatory evaluation
of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for
this final rule. The reasoning for this
determination follows:
This final rule enhances safety by
improving the flow of air traffic thereby
reducing the potential for midair
collision in the Charlotte, NC, terminal
area. After consultation with a diverse
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
cross-section of stakeholders that
participated in the ad hoc committee,
we found in the NPRM that the
proposed rule might result in minimal
cost. As we received no adverse
comments regarding the initial
economic analysis, we have determined
that this final rule will result in minimal
cost.
This final rule will enhance safety,
reduce the potential for a midair
collision and will improve the flow of
air traffic. As such, we estimate a
minimal impact with substantial
positive net benefits. FAA has,
therefore, determined that this final rule
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, and is not ‘‘significant’’ as
defined in DOT’s Regulatory Policies
and Procedures.
Final Regulatory Flexibility
Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
Our initial determination was that the
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. We received
no public comments regarding our
initial determination. As such, this final
rule will not have a significant
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
economic impact is expected to be
minimal.
Therefore the FAA Administrator
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$143.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
The FAA has assessed the effect of this
final rule and determined that it will
enhance safety and is not considered an
unnecessary obstacle to trade.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
■
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9U,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, and
effective September 15, 2010, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 3000
Airspace.
Subpart B—Class B
*
*
*
*
*
ASO NC B Charlotte, NC [Revised]
Charlotte/Douglas International Airport
(Primary Airport)
(Lat. 35°12′49″ N., long. 80°56′57″ W.)
Charlotte VOR/DME
(Lat. 35°11′25″ N., long. 80°57′06″ W.)
Gastonia Municipal Airport
(Lat. 35°12′10″ N., long. 81°09′00″ W.)
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Boundaries
Area A. That airspace extending upward
from the surface to and including 10,000 feet
MSL within a 7-mile radius of the Charlotte
VOR/DME.
Area B. That airspace extending upward
from 1,800 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 024° radial 14-mile fix;
thence direct to the Charlotte VOR/DME 032°
radial 11-mile fix, thence clockwise via the
11-mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to lat.
35°09′37″ N., long. 81°10′21″ W.; thence east
to lat. 35°10′17″ N., long. 81°08′10″ W.;
thence counterclockwise around a 2-mile
radius of the Gastonia Municipal Airport to
lat. 35°14′02″ N., long. 81°08′10″ W.; thence
west to intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat.
35°15′00″ N., long. 81°11′21″ W.; thence
north along U.S. Highway 321 to the 14-mile
arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME at lat.
35°19′20″ N., long. 81°11′13″ W.; thence
clockwise via the 14-mile arc to the point of
beginning, excluding that airspace within
Area A described above.
Area C. That airspace extending upward
from 3,600 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of U.S. Highway 321 and the
Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
35°26′49″ N., long. 81°12′44″ W.; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc to intersect
the Marshall Steam Plant Rail Spur at lat.
35°31′14″ N., long. 81°00′42″ W.; thence
north along the Rail Spur to the Charlotte
VOR/DME 25-mile arc at lat. 35°36′25″ N.,
long. 80°58′57″ W.; thence clockwise along
the 25-mile arc to long. 80°46′00″ W.; thence
south along long. 80°46′00″ W., to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 23-mile arc; thence
clockwise along the 23-mile arc to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 067° radial; thence
southwest along the 067° radial to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 081° radial; thence west
along the 081° radial to the Charlotte VOR/
DME 11-mile arc; thence counterclockwise
along the 11-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/
DME 032° radial, 11-mile fix; thence direct to
the Charlotte VOR/DME 024° radial, 14-mile
fix; thence counterclockwise along the 14mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to
intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35°19′20″
N., long. 81°11′13″ W., thence north along
U.S. Highway 321 to the point of beginning.
Area D. That airspace extending upward
from 5,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 081° radial 11-mile fix;
thence east along the 081° radial to the 20mile fix; thence clockwise along the 20-mile
arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to lat.
34°56′07″ N., long. 80°41′23″ W.; thence
north to the point of beginning.
Area E. That airspace extending upward
from 3,600 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at lat.
35°15′00″ N., long. 81°11′21″ W., thence east
to lat. 35°14′02″ N., long. 81°08′10″ W.;
thence clockwise along a 2-mile radius of the
Gastonia Municipal Airport to lat. 35°10′17″
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
N., long. 81°08′10″ W.; thence west to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 11-mile arc
at lat. 35°09′37″ N., long. 81°10′21″ W.;
thence counterclockwise along the 11-mile
arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 081° radial 11mile fix; thence south direct to the Charlotte
VOR/DME 147° radial 25-mile fix; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc of the
Charlotte VOR/DME to lat. 34°49′37″ N.,
long. 81°12′05″ W.; thence north to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 218° radial 20-mile fix,
thence clockwise along the 20-mile arc of the
Charlotte VOR/DME, to intersect U.S.
Highway 321 at lat. 34°57′21″ N., long.
81°14′28″ W.; thence north along U.S.
Highway 321 to the point of beginning.
Area F. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of the power lines and the
Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
35°08′08″ N., long. 81°21′10″ W.; thence east
along the power lines to intersect U.S.
Highway 321 at lat. 35°11′52″ N., long.
81°12′41″ W.; thence south along U.S.
Highway 321 to intersect the Charlotte VOR/
DME 20-mile arc at lat. 34°57′21″ N., long.
81°14′28″ W; thence clockwise along the
20-mile arc to the point of beginning.
Area G. That airspace extending upward
from 5,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of the power lines and the
Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
35°08′08″ N., long. 81°21′10″ W.; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc to intersect
U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35°26′49″ N., long.
81°12′44″ W.; thence south along U.S.
Highway 321 to intersect the power lines at
lat. 35°11′52″ N., long. 81°12′41″ W.; thence
west along the power lines to the point of
beginning.
Area H. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at lat.
35°37′15″ N., long. 81°10′32″ W.; thence
direct to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME
30-mile arc at lat. 35°41′30″ N., long.
80°57′40″ W.; thence clockwise along the 30mile arc to long. 80°46′00″ W.; thence south
along long. 80°46′00″ W., to intersect the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence
counterclockwise along the 25-mile arc to
intersect the Marshall Steam Plant Rail Spur
at lat. 35°36′25″ N., long. 80°58′57″ W.;
thence south along the Rail Spur to intersect
the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
35°31′14″ N., long. 81°00′42″ W.; thence
counterclockwise along the 20-mile arc to
intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35°26′49″
N., long. 81°12′44″ W.; thence north along
U.S. Highway 321 to intersect the Charlotte
VOR/DME 25-mile arc at lat. 35°32′26″ N.,
long. 81°13′44″ W.; thence clockwise along
the 25-mile arc to intersect the Charlotte
VOR/DME 337° radial; thence northwest
along the 337° radial to the point of
beginning.
Area I. That airspace extending upward
from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 062° radial, 30-mile fix,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69869
thence southwest along the 062° radial to the
25-mile fix; thence clockwise along the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 120° radial; thence
southeast along the 120° radial to the 30-mile
fix; thence clockwise along the Charlotte
VOR/DME 30-mile arc to lat. 34°44′58″ N.,
long. 80°39′47″ W.; thence north direct to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc
at lat. 34°56′07″ N., long. 80°41′23″ W.;
thence counterclockwise along the 20-mile
arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 067° radial;
thence northeast along the 067° radial to the
23-mile arc; thence counterclockwise along
the 23-mile arc to long. 80°46′00″ W.; thence
north along long. 80°46′00″ W., to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc; thence
clockwise along the 30-mile arc to the point
of beginning.
Area J. That airspace extending upward
from 4,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 147° radial 25-mile fix;
thence direct to intersect the Charlotte VOR/
DME 30-mile arc at lat. 34°44′58″ N., long.
80°39′47″ W.; thence clockwise along the
Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc to lat.
34°44′01″ N., long. 81°12′05″ W.; thence
north to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 25mile arc at lat. 34°49′37″ N., long. 81°12′05″
W.; thence counterclockwise along the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc to the point
of beginning.
Area K. That airspace extending upward
from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 10,000
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 293° radial, 30-mile fix;
thence clockwise along the Charlotte VOR/
DME 30-mile arc to lat. 35°41′30″ N., long.
80°57′40″ W.; thence southwest direct to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 337° at lat.
35°37′15″ N., long. 81°10′32″ W.; thence
southeast along the 337° radial to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence
counterclockwise along the 25-mile arc to
intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35°32′26″
N., long. 81°13′44″ W., thence south along
new Highway 321 to intersect the Charlotte
VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat. 35°26′49″ N.,
long. 81°12′44″ W.; thence counterclockwise
along the 20-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/
DME 218° radial; thence south to intersect
the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc at lat.
34°44′01″ N., long. 81°12′05″ W.; thence
clockwise along the 30-mile arc to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 242° radial, thence
northeast along the 242° radial to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 293° radial; thence
northwest along the 293° radial to the point
of beginning.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3,
2010.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
69870
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DATES:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
Effective Date: November 16,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 0
[Docket No. OAG 136; A.G. Order No. 3227–
2010]
Delegation of Authority Under 18
U.S.C. 249
Department of Justice.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This rule amends 28 CFR part
0 to delegate the Attorney General’s
certification authority under 18 U.S.C.
249, relating to hate crimes, to the
Assistant Attorney General for the Civil
Rights Division, and, in limited
circumstances, to the Assistant Attorney
General for the Criminal Division.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Nov 15, 2010
Jkt 223001
Robert Moossy, Acting Section Chief,
Civil Rights Division, Criminal Section,
Patrick Henry Building, 950
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530, (202) 305–2445.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 28, 2009, President Obama
signed into law the Matthew Shepard
and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes
Prevention Act of 2009 (Shepard-Byrd
Act). Among other things, the ShepardByrd Act created a new federal hate
crime statute to be codified at 18 U.S.C.
249. The Shepard-Byrd Act expressly
provides that no prosecution under
section 249 may be undertaken without
a written certification by the Attorney
General (or a designee) that the State
does not have jurisdiction; the State has
requested that the federal government
assume jurisdiction; the verdict or
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sentence obtained through State charges
left demonstrably unvindicated the
federal interest in eradicating biasmotivated violence; or a prosecution by
the federal government is in the public
interest and necessary to secure
substantial justice. The statute expressly
allows the Attorney General to delegate
this certification authority to a designee,
and this rule accordingly amends 28
CFR part 0 to delegate the Attorney
General’s certification authority under
18 U.S.C. 249 to the Assistant Attorney
General for the Civil Rights Division,
and, in limited circumstances, to the
Assistant Attorney General for the
Criminal Division.
Regulatory Certifications
This rule is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, and practice
and is limited to matters of agency
management and personnel.
Accordingly: (1) This rule is exempt
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
ER16NO10.000
[FR Doc. 2010–28399 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am]
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69864-69870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28399]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0049; Airspace Docket No. 08-AWA-1]
RIN 2120-AA66
Modification of Class B Airspace; Charlotte, NC
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action modifies the Charlotte, NC, Class B airspace area
to ensure the containment of aircraft, accommodate the implementation
of area navigation (RNAV) departure procedures, and support operations
of the third parallel runway at Charlotte/Douglas International
Airport. The FAA is taking this action to improve the flow of air
traffic, enhance safety, and reduce the potential for midair collision
in the Charlotte, NC, terminal area.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, January 13, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
3 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Systems and AIM, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 3, 2010, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify the Charlotte, NC Class
B airspace area (75 FR 9538). This action proposed to expand the
lateral and vertical limits of the Charlotte Class B airspace area: To
provide the additional airspace needed to support operations of a third
parallel runway and the implementation of RNAV departure procedures; to
contain ILS approach procedures for runways 23, 18L, 18C (formerly 18R
but redesignated November 20, 2008) and the new runway (18R); and to
contain aircraft being vectored to a base leg from the west when
Charlotte/Douglas International Airport (CLT) is on a north operation.
In addition, the FAA published in the Federal Register a correction
to the notice to provide a graphic chart of the proposed area that was
inadvertently omitted from notice (75 FR 13049; March 18, 2010).
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. Twelve written
comments were received in response to the notice.
Discussion of Comments
Two commenters expressed concerns about the availability of the
published low altitude area navigation (RNAV) routes (i.e., T-routes)
through the Charlotte terminal area. One commenter wrote that he
regularly flies east/west across North Carolina but seldom is cleared
for a T-route. Another commenter said that the FAA should re-evaluate
and potentially amend the Charlotte T-routes if necessary to increase
availability.
There are currently four T-routes that traverse Charlotte's
terminal airspace. T-200 and T-202 are east/west oriented routes; and
T-201 and T-203 are north/south routes. The FAA acknowledges that
availability of the east/west T-routes is limited. When the new runway
36L/18R opened in November 2009 and in order to accommodate triple
instrument operations, Charlotte airport traffic control tower (ATCT)
restricted overflight traffic on V-66, T-200 and T-202 during certain
times. This restriction is in place when Charlotte is on a north
operation (i.e., aircraft landing and departing to the north). The FAA
has reviewed the existing T-routes and found that it is difficult to
utilize the east/west T-routes through the Charlotte terminal area more
than the current practice. When Charlotte is on a north operation,
final radar airspace begins at Charlotte airport and extends southward
to the boundary with Columbia, SC, ATCT airspace. On a south operation,
final radar airspace begins at the airport and extends northward to the
boundary with Atlanta Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). Because
traffic in the above mentioned areas is descending from the enroute
structure all the way to the surface for landing, it is difficult to
[[Page 69865]]
provide additional T-routes through these areas. This is likely to
continue because, since June 2009, there has been a five percent
increase in traffic at the Charlotte airport, with traffic projected to
continue to increase at a moderate rate. It should be noted that
controllers do not normally ``offer'' T-routes to pilots when they are
approaching Charlotte airspace. When these routes were first developed,
it was the expectation that pilots would file the T-routes in their
flight plan. When the T-route is not filed in the flight plan and a
pilot subsequently requests clearance into a T-route, controllers must
re-clear the aircraft off the filed route and onto the T-route and
amend the pilot's route in the National Airspace System (NAS). This
could lead to confusion as to where the route begins and ends, and
where the route leaves or rejoins the previously filed route. It should
also be noted that the two north/south oriented T-routes through
Charlotte's airspace remain available with very few restrictions. Any
limitations imposed on those routes would be based on real-time
traffic. If pilots wish to file a T-route in the flight plan, Charlotte
controllers will make every attempt to allow the pilot to remain on the
route.
Five persons wrote with concerns about expanding the part of the
Class B airspace (with a 4,000 foot MSL floor) over Lancaster County-
McWhirter Field (LKR), located in Lancaster, South Carolina. They
contend that the change would cause the loss of, or modification to, an
approved Aerobatic Practice Area (APA) at LKR. The APA is used by many
members of the International Aerobatic Club and a number of aerobatic
teams train there. The APA currently extends from 500 feet above ground
level (AGL) to 4,000 feet AGL, and operates in accordance with a waiver
granted by the FAA. Commenters contend that the Class B airspace floor
is set at 4,000 feet MSL in this area as proposed, the APA would extend
nearly 500 feet into Class B airspace. They note that the APA ceiling
could be lowered to 3,500 feet AGL, but this would allow only a 14 foot
margin below the Class B for pilots to avoid an airspace violation.
Commenters suggested that the Class B floor over LKR be raised to at
least 5,000 feet MSL to allow them to fly safely while practicing
competitive aerobatics.
The FAA recognizes that establishing a 4,000 foot MSL Class B
airspace floor would place the ceiling of LKR's APA within Class B
airspace. However, FAA's facility operation directive (FAA Order
7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration) specifically addresses
aerobatic practice areas and provides a means for air traffic managers
to accommodate aerobatic practice activity within Class B airspace.
Based on the guidelines stated in the directive, the FAA believes it
can work out a satisfactory arrangement with the aerobatic operators at
LKR.
Also, one of the commenters questioned the need for Charlotte
arrivals from the southeast and the west to be at 3,500 feet AGL when
30 nautical miles (NM) from the Charlotte airport. The FAA has
carefully considered the Class B airspace configuration in this area.
The proposal to extend Class B airspace over LKR with a floor of 4,000
feet MSL was based on procedures required for managing arrivals and
departures using runway 36R. Runway 36R is used for all east and
southbound departures. In addition, runway 36R is used for both
departure and arrival traffic to avoid extensive taxi and runway
crossing requirements. General aviation, corporate and military traffic
departing from and arriving to, the fixed base operator and Air
National Guard areas on the airport are often assigned runway 36R.
Assigning this traffic to runway 36R enhances efficiency because that
runway is closest to those ramps and parking areas. This practice keeps
runway crossings to a minimum, which reduces the potential for runway
incursions and greatly enhances the safety of aircraft movement on the
airport surface areas. Arrivals to runway 36R often require at least
four nautical miles (NM) in-trail spacing. This is necessary to provide
space for runway 36R departures to depart safely between arrivals. In-
trail spacing of greater than four NM is required for wake turbulence
considerations when the preceding aircraft is a heavy jet or if the
weight class difference between the leading and trailing aircraft meet
certain criteria. Both the in-trail spacing required for departures and
the in-trail spacing required for wake turbulence contribute to the
lengthening of the final approach course. Therefore, it is not uncommon
for the final approach course to extend to a point adjacent to LKR.
Additionally, the initial approach altitude for traffic conducting
the ILS runway 36R approach is 4,000 feet MSL. During triple
simultaneous ILS operations (runways 36R, 36C and 36L) the following
altitude assignments are used: Runway 36R--4,000 feet MSL; runway 36C--
8,000 feet MSL; and runway 36L--5,000 or 6,000 feet MSL. FAA separation
standards for triple ILS approaches require that arriving aircraft be
vertically separated by a minimum of 1,000 feet until they are
established inbound on the ILS final approach course (localizer). Based
on the above, the FAA concluded that the 4,000 foot MSL floor is needed
to provide adequate Class B airspace for these aircraft operations.
Two commenters wrote that the expansion of Class B airspace by
adding Area J would significantly impact general aviation and sky
diving operations at Chester Catawba Regional Airport (DCM), in
Chester, SC. The new Area J lies to the south of the Charlotte airport
between the 25 NM and 30 NM arcs of the Charlotte VOR/DME. It extends
from 4,000 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL. While DCM currently lies
outside the Charlotte Class B airspace area, the new Area J would
overlie the airport.
The FAA does not agree that the new Area J would cause significant
impact on DCM operations. The instrument procedures serving the airport
are still available and airport VFR traffic patterns are not affected
by the expanded Class B airspace. The sky dive operations will continue
to be accommodated at DCM. Charlotte ATCT is working with the operators
of SkyDive Carolina to develop a mutually satisfactory Letter of
Agreement (LOA) governing those operations. The LOA will standardize
the handling of jump aircraft at DCM and provide a workable solution
that will mitigate the concerns of both parties.
One commenter questioned the validity of the reason stated in the
notice for lowering Class B airspace to 4,000 feet MSL in that area.
The NPRM stated that when Charlotte is on a north operation, a
significant number of aircraft inbound from the southwest on either the
UNARM ONE or ADENA TWO standard terminal arrival routes (STAR) exit and
reenter Class B airspace between the current 6,000 foot MSL Class B
airspace floor and the 4,600 foot MSL floor to the south-southwest of
Charlotte. The commenter questioned this reasoning because the two
STARs never get closer than nine NM to DCM. The commenter suggested
that a two NM cutout of Class B airspace centered on DCM would permit
unhampered operations at DCM while containing aircraft inbound to CLT
within Class B airspace.
The FAA does not agree with the suggestion for a two NM Class B
airspace cutout around DCM. If the airspace over DCM is not contained
within Class B airspace, it would be necessary for controllers to
direct aircraft to the north or south of DCM. This would greatly
increase controller workload and frequency congestion while decreasing
efficiency. The FAA finds that any Class B airspace cutout of usable
size or shape would require
[[Page 69866]]
extensive vectoring of aircraft to remain in Class B airspace.
In response to the above mentioned comment that the UNARM and ADENA
STARs never get closer than nine NM to DCM, it is true when Charlotte
is on a south operation using runways 18R, 18C, 18L and 23 for landing.
However, when Charlotte is on a north operation, traffic is vectored
off the UNARM and ADENA STARs almost immediately upon entering
Charlotte ATCT's area of jurisdiction. This traffic is then assigned an
easterly heading for vectors to the runway 36L, 36C or 36R final
approach course. A review of radar-derived plots of actual flight
patterns used on a north operation clearly show that DCM is overflown
by aircraft assigned these base leg vectors.
Two commenters asked the FAA to consider lowering the current
10,000 foot MSL ceiling of the Charlotte Class B airspace area to 7,000
feet MSL. One commenter stated that there is no requirement for Class B
airspace to extend to 10,000 feet MSL and cited other Class B locations
(New York, Philadelphia and Boston) that currently have a 7,000 foot
ceiling. The commenter believes that reducing the Charlotte Class B
airspace ceiling would allow nonparticipating aircraft to transition
the area with greater ease, reducing pilot and controller workloads.
The FAA does not agree with the commenters requests. Class B design
guidelines state that the upper limit of Class B airspace normally
should not exceed 10,000 feet MSL. However, Class B airspace dimensions
are individually tailored to site-specific requirements. To illustrate
this, there are 30 Class B airspace areas (covering 37 primary
airports). Of these areas, 13 have Class B ceilings at 10,000 feet MSL;
5 areas have 7,000 foot ceilings; 6 areas at 8,000 feet; 3 areas at
9,000 feet; and 3 areas have ceilings above 10,000 feet MSL. In the
case of the Charlotte Class B airspace area, the FAA determined that
lowering the Class B ceiling from 10,000 feet to 7,000 feet MSL would
not provide adequate Class B airspace for aircraft operating into and
out of the Charlotte airport. Specifically, Charlotte procedures and
letters of agreement with adjacent ARTCCs require arriving turbojet and
high performance turboprop aircraft enter Charlotte ATCT's area of
jurisdiction at altitudes between 10,000 feet and 13,000 feet MSL. Once
inside Charlotte ATCT's area of jurisdiction, this arrival traffic is
assigned an altitude of 9,000 feet until abeam the Charlotte airport
(for downwind traffic). Turbojet departures are assigned an initial
altitude of 8,000 feet. Frequently, the arrivals at 9,000 feet and the
departures at 8,000 feet ``cross out'' within 20 NM of the Charlotte
airport. By lowering the Class B ceiling to 7,000 feet as suggested,
uncontrolled VFR aircraft, not in communication with ATC, would be
added to this mix of cross-out traffic. This situation would not
provide adequate protection to the arrivals, departures and VFR
aircraft operating in a congested airspace area as they transition to
and from the enroute structure.
One commenter wrote about problems encountered when departing IFR
northeastbound from the Lake Norman Airpark (14A), Mooresville, NC, to
Greensboro, NC. The commenter, who flies a high-performance, single-
engine turboprop aircraft, said he was directed to fly at 3,000 feet
southeastbound for 325 miles in order to go northeast bound to
Greensboro, NC. In addition, when flying northbound from Columbia, SC,
to 14A, the commenter stated he is required to fly the arrival from
Florence, SC to 14A, which is a considerable deviation. The commenter
also requested that the FAA establish IFR routes to the north through
Charlotte airspace.
The FAA is not aware of any aircraft that are vectored 325 miles
off course. In fact, the longest radius the Charlotte ATCT facility
controls from Charlotte Airport is less than 60 miles. Traffic
departing Lake Norman Airpark with a destination of Greensboro Airport
(GSO) should be able to proceed initially at an altitude of 3,000 feet,
and then receive a climb clearance to a higher altitude within 15-20
miles (in a worst-case scenario). This would normally only occur if
Charlotte were using a triple parallel simultaneous ILS approach, south
operation, which occurs very infrequently (less than 5% of operations).
If Charlotte were on a south converging operation (approximately 55% of
the time) the aircraft in question should be able to climb to at least
5,000 feet within 10 miles of the Lake Norman Airpark, and then
continue to climb to the pilot's requested altitude. If Charlotte is on
a north operation (approximately 40% of operations) this aircraft
should normally be assigned its final requested altitude within 10
miles of the Lake Norman Airpark. As is the case with most high density
terminal areas, all high performance turbine-powered aircraft are
assigned specific STARs. In the case of Charlotte, these STARs are
arranged in a four-corner ``bedpost'' configuration. Therefore, high
performance traffic from the Columbia, SC, Airport would be routed by
the surrounding ARTCCs via either the UNARM or Chesterfield (or
equivalent RNAV) STARs. If the traffic is not high performance (turbine
powered) it could proceed virtually direct at an altitude of at or
below 7,000 feet. Depending on traffic volume, low-performance aircraft
could expect to be vectored 15 to 20 miles east or west of Charlotte
airport to avoid congestion during busy periods.
Regarding the request to establish IFR routes north through
Charlotte airspace, there are two north-south RNAV T-routes (T-201 and
T-203) through the Charlotte Class B airspace area. RNAV route T-203
extends between Columbia, SC (CAE) and Pulaski, VA (PSK) transiting
through the west side of the Charlotte Class B airspace area. In
addition, VOR Federal airway V-37 is a north-south route through the
Class B airspace area.
Three commenters from the Lancaster County, SC, area were concerned
with noise and environmental issues. They argue that there would be an
increase in noise from extending the Charlotte Class B airspace area
that would affect lifestyle, wildlife and property values in the area.
They questioned the need for aircraft to fly so low over Lancaster, SC,
which is 40 miles from Charlotte Airport. They suggested that aircraft
fly no lower than 5,000 feet over the area.
The purpose of Class B airspace is to reduce the potential for
midair collisions in the airspace surrounding airports with high
density air traffic operations. All aircraft operating in Class B
airspace are subject to certain operating rules and equipment
requirements. Class B airspace ensures that all aircraft flying in
close proximity to high-performance, turbine-powered aircraft are under
the guidance and control of an Air Traffic Control (ATC) facility.
Aircraft flight paths are dictated by many factors including, but not
limited to: the direction of operation at the Charlotte Airport;
weather conditions, which determine the type of approaches being
conducted; and traffic volume, which determines how long the final
approach course is, as well as the base leg and downwind flight paths
of aircraft. At Charlotte Airport, traffic volume varies with the time
of day and, to some extent, the day of the week.
As discussed above in response to a previous comment, ATC
procedures require that aircraft must be assigned non-conflicting
altitudes. During triple parallel ILS operations, ATC assigns altitudes
that are at least 1,000 feet apart to ensure separation between
aircraft being vectored ``head-on'' to adjacent final approach courses.
This is why aircraft using runways 36R and 36L are assigned 4,000 feet
and 5,000 feet respectively. The use of the 4,000-foot altitude over
the Lancaster area has been
[[Page 69867]]
in place for several years (It should be noted that the previous
required altitude was 3,600 feet).
Because of the extensive use of runway 36R for departures, arriving
aircraft must be spaced further apart to provide room for aircraft
awaiting take off to be sequenced between aircraft that are landing.
This means that, during heavy departure periods, the final approach
course for traffic landing on runway 36R often extends 25 to 30 miles
from the airport. This places much of this traffic over the Lancaster,
SC, area at an assigned altitude of 4,000 feet. The expansion of the
Charlotte Class B airspace area will provide Class B protection for
these aircraft operating at 4,000 feet.
If 5,000 feet is used as the floor of Class B airspace in the
vicinity of Lancaster, SC, it will require traffic assigned to runway
36L to operate no lower than 6,000 feet in order to meet the 1,000 foot
vertical separation requirement. If traffic using runway 36L joins the
final approach course at 6,000 feet instead of 5,000 feet, it would
drive the final approach course out further from the airport. This
could hamper the controller's flexibility in providing an orderly and
expeditious flow of traffic because less room would be available for
vectoring, sequencing and spacing traffic.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to modify the Charlotte, NC, Class B airspace area. This action
(depicted on the attached chart) expands the lateral and vertical
limits of the Charlotte Class B airspace area to provide the additional
airspace needed to: ensure the containment aircraft within Class B
airspace as required by FAA directives; support the operations of a
third parallel runway (18R/36L); and, accommodate RNAV departure
procedures. The modifications to the Charlotte Class B airspace area
are summarized below:
Area A that extends from the surface to and including 10,000 feet
MSL is unchanged by this rule.
Area B that extends from 1,800 feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL is
modified by expanding a part of Area B north of the Charlotte Airport
from the current 11 NM arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME (CLT) outward to
the 14 NM arc. This expansion of Area B is made only from the point of
intersection of the CLT 14 NM arc and Highway 321, then clockwise along
the 14 NM arc to the CLT 024[deg]T radial. At that point, Area B
reverts to the existing 11 NM arc. The purpose of this change is to
ensure that arrivals to runways 18R, 18C and 18L are contained within
Class B airspace throughout the approach. In addition, the cutout
around the Gastonia Municipal Airport (AKH) is widened to facilitate
better access to and from the airport.
Area C is that airspace extending upward from 3,600 feet MSL to and
including 10,000 feet MSL that lies to the north of Area B.
Additionally, the northeast edge of Area C is moved from the current
CLT 20 NM arc outward to the 23 NM arc. This change extends the 3,600
foot Class B airspace floor by 3 NM to the northeast to accommodate
vectoring patterns and the descent profile of aircraft conducting the
ILS RWY 23 approach.
Area D is redescribed as a small area located east of the Charlotte
Airport, (south of Area C and east of Area B) that extends from 5,000
feet MSL up to 10,000 feet MSL. The modified Area D lowers Class B
airspace from 6,000 feet MSL to 5,000 feet MSL in order to contain
aircraft flying easterly RNAV departure procedures within Class B
airspace during climbout.
Area E is redescribed as that airspace from 3,600 feet MSL up to
10,000 feet MSL, located to the south of Area B. The modified Area E
extends the 3,600 foot Class B airspace floor southward to the CLT 25
NM arc. This will provide adequate vectoring airspace and ensure that
aircraft will be retained within Class B airspace.
Area F is redescribed as that airspace extending from 4,000 feet
MSL to 10,000 feet MSL. The modified Area F is located southwest of AKH
within an area bounded by Highway 321, the CLT 20 NM arc and power
lines that extend in a southwesterly direction west of AKH. This area
provides an adequate vector area for runway 5 arrivals.
Area G is a new area extending from 5,000 feet MSL up to 10,000
feet MSL located generally northwest of AKH. Area G consists of that
airspace within an area bounded by the power lines, the CLT 20 NM arc,
and Highway 321. Along with Area F, Area G provides airspace to prevent
aircraft departing on westerly tracks from exiting and reentering Class
B airspace during climbout.
Area H is a new area extending from 4,000 feet MSL up to 10,000
feet MSL in the northernmost section of the Charlotte Class B airspace
area. This area extends the 4,000 foot floor of Class B airspace out to
the CLT 30 NM arc, north of the airport. This extension is needed to
provide adequate airspace needed for separation and vectoring arrivals
to the appropriate final approach course; to comply with simultaneous
triple ILS procedures; and, to ensure aircraft remain within Class B
airspace.
Area I is a new segment defining the easternmost section of the
Class B airspace area. Area I extends from 6,000 feet MSL up to 10,000
feet MSL. This segment lowers the floor of Class B airspace from 8,000
feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within that area from Highway 601 eastward
to the CLT 25 NM. The rest of Area I retains the current 6,000 foot MSL
floor. These changes ensure arrivals and departures do not exit and
reenter Class B airspace.
Area J is a new area directly south of Area E. Area J extends Class
B airspace, with a 4,000 foot MSL floor, southward between the CLT 25
NM arc and the CLT 30 NM arc. This expands the 4,000 foot floor of
Class B airspace out to the CLT 30 NM arc, south of the airport. This
extension is needed to provide adequate airspace needed for separation
and vectoring arrivals to the appropriate final approach course; to
comply with simultaneous triple ILS procedures; and, to ensure that
aircraft remain within Class B airspace.
Area K is a new segment defining the westernmost section of the
Class B airspace area. Area K extends from 6,000 feet MSL up to 10,000
feet MSL. This segment lowers the floor of Class B airspace from 8,000
feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within the area between the CLT 20 NM arc
and the CLT 25 NM arc (west of the Charlotte Airport). Area K also
extends Class B airspace southward to abut Area J. The rest of the
airspace in Area K retains the current 6,000 foot MSL floor.
Finally, the Charlotte/Douglas International Airport reference
point coordinates in the Class B airspace legal description are changed
from lat. 35[deg]12'52'' N., long. 80[deg]56'36'' W., to 35[deg]12'49''
N., long. 80[deg]56'57'' W., to reflect the latest National Airspace
System data.
The above changes to the Charlotte Class B airspace area are needed
to ensure the containment of IFR aircraft within Class B airspace as
required by FAA directives; accommodate the implementation of RNAV
departure procedures; and support operations of a third parallel
runway.
All radials listed in the Charlotte Class B airspace description in
this rule are stated in degrees relative to True North.
Class B airspace areas are published in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order
JO 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010 and effective September 15, 2010
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class B airspace
area in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
[[Page 69868]]
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. We have determined that there
is no new information collection requirement associated with this final
rule.
Regulatory Evaluation Summary
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that each Federal agency
shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of
the economic impacts of this final rule. Department of Transportation
Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and procedures for simplification,
analysis, and review of regulations. If the expected cost impact is so
minimal that a proposed or final rule does not warrant a full
evaluation, this order permits that a statement to that effect and the
basis for it be included in the preamble if a full regulatory
evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared. Such a
determination has been made for this final rule. The reasoning for this
determination follows:
This final rule enhances safety by improving the flow of air
traffic thereby reducing the potential for midair collision in the
Charlotte, NC, terminal area. After consultation with a diverse cross-
section of stakeholders that participated in the ad hoc committee, we
found in the NPRM that the proposed rule might result in minimal cost.
As we received no adverse comments regarding the initial economic
analysis, we have determined that this final rule will result in
minimal cost.
This final rule will enhance safety, reduce the potential for a
midair collision and will improve the flow of air traffic. As such, we
estimate a minimal impact with substantial positive net benefits. FAA
has, therefore, determined that this final rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's Regulatory
Policies and Procedures.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
Our initial determination was that the rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
We received no public comments regarding our initial determination. As
such, this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the economic impact is
expected to be minimal.
Therefore the FAA Administrator certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $143.1 million in lieu of $100
million. The FAA has assessed the effect of this final rule and
determined that it will enhance safety and is not considered an
unnecessary obstacle to trade.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Amendment
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 3000 Subpart B--Class B Airspace.
* * * * *
ASO NC B Charlotte, NC [Revised]
Charlotte/Douglas International Airport (Primary Airport)
(Lat. 35[deg]12'49'' N., long. 80[deg]56'57'' W.)
Charlotte VOR/DME
(Lat. 35[deg]11'25'' N., long. 80[deg]57'06'' W.)
Gastonia Municipal Airport
(Lat. 35[deg]12'10'' N., long. 81[deg]09'00'' W.)
[[Page 69869]]
Boundaries
Area A. That airspace extending upward from the surface to and
including 10,000 feet MSL within a 7-mile radius of the Charlotte
VOR/DME.
Area B. That airspace extending upward from 1,800 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 024[deg] radial 14-mile fix; thence direct to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 032[deg] radial 11-mile fix, thence clockwise via
the 11-mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to lat. 35[deg]09'37'' N.,
long. 81[deg]10'21'' W.; thence east to lat. 35[deg]10'17'' N.,
long. 81[deg]08'10'' W.; thence counterclockwise around a 2-mile
radius of the Gastonia Municipal Airport to lat. 35[deg]14'02'' N.,
long. 81[deg]08'10'' W.; thence west to intersect U.S. Highway 321
at lat. 35[deg]15'00'' N., long. 81[deg]11'21'' W.; thence north
along U.S. Highway 321 to the 14-mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME
at lat. 35[deg]19'20'' N., long. 81[deg]11'13'' W.; thence clockwise
via the 14-mile arc to the point of beginning, excluding that
airspace within Area A described above.
Area C. That airspace extending upward from 3,600 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of U.S. Highway 321 and the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile
arc at lat. 35[deg]26'49'' N., long. 81[deg]12'44'' W.; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc to intersect the Marshall Steam
Plant Rail Spur at lat. 35[deg]31'14'' N., long. 81[deg]00'42'' W.;
thence north along the Rail Spur to the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile
arc at lat. 35[deg]36'25'' N., long. 80[deg]58'57'' W.; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc to long. 80[deg]46'00'' W.; thence
south along long. 80[deg]46'00'' W., to the Charlotte VOR/DME 23-
mile arc; thence clockwise along the 23-mile arc to the Charlotte
VOR/DME 067[deg] radial; thence southwest along the 067[deg] radial
to the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc; thence clockwise along the 20-
mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 081[deg] radial; thence west along
the 081[deg] radial to the Charlotte VOR/DME 11-mile arc; thence
counterclockwise along the 11-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME
032[deg] radial, 11-mile fix; thence direct to the Charlotte VOR/DME
024[deg] radial, 14-mile fix; thence counterclockwise along the 14-
mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to intersect U.S. Highway 321 at
lat. 35[deg]19'20'' N., long. 81[deg]11'13'' W., thence north along
U.S. Highway 321 to the point of beginning.
Area D. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 081[deg] radial 11-mile fix; thence east along the
081[deg] radial to the 20-mile fix; thence clockwise along the 20-
mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to lat. 34[deg]56'07'' N., long.
80[deg]41'23'' W.; thence north to the point of beginning.
Area E. That airspace extending upward from 3,600 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at lat.
35[deg]15'00'' N., long. 81[deg]11'21'' W., thence east to lat.
35[deg]14'02'' N., long. 81[deg]08'10'' W.; thence clockwise along a
2-mile radius of the Gastonia Municipal Airport to lat.
35[deg]10'17'' N., long. 81[deg]08'10'' W.; thence west to intersect
the Charlotte VOR/DME 11-mile arc at lat. 35[deg]09'37'' N., long.
81[deg]10'21'' W.; thence counterclockwise along the 11-mile arc to
the Charlotte VOR/DME 081[deg] radial 11-mile fix; thence south
direct to the Charlotte VOR/DME 147[deg] radial 25-mile fix; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME to lat.
34[deg]49'37'' N., long. 81[deg]12'05'' W.; thence north to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 218[deg] radial 20-mile fix, thence clockwise
along the 20-mile arc of the Charlotte VOR/DME, to intersect U.S.
Highway 321 at lat. 34[deg]57'21'' N., long. 81[deg]14'28'' W.;
thence north along U.S. Highway 321 to the point of beginning.
Area F. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of the power lines and the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile
arc at lat. 35[deg]08'08'' N., long. 81[deg]21'10'' W.; thence east
along the power lines to intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat.
35[deg]11'52'' N., long. 81[deg]12'41'' W.; thence south along U.S.
Highway 321 to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
34[deg]57'21'' N., long. 81[deg]14'28'' W; thence clockwise along
the 20-mile arc to the point of beginning.
Area G. That airspace extending upward from 5,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
intersection of the power lines and the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile
arc at lat. 35[deg]08'08'' N., long. 81[deg]21'10'' W.; thence
clockwise along the 20-mile arc to intersect U.S. Highway 321 at
lat. 35[deg]26'49'' N., long. 81[deg]12'44'' W.; thence south along
U.S. Highway 321 to intersect the power lines at lat. 35[deg]11'52''
N., long. 81[deg]12'41'' W.; thence west along the power lines to
the point of beginning.
Area H. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at lat.
35[deg]37'15'' N., long. 81[deg]10'32'' W.; thence direct to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc at lat. 35[deg]41'30''
N., long. 80[deg]57'40'' W.; thence clockwise along the 30-mile arc
to long. 80[deg]46'00'' W.; thence south along long. 80[deg]46'00''
W., to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence
counterclockwise along the 25-mile arc to intersect the Marshall
Steam Plant Rail Spur at lat. 35[deg]36'25'' N., long.
80[deg]58'57'' W.; thence south along the Rail Spur to intersect the
Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat. 35[deg]31'14'' N., long.
81[deg]00'42'' W.; thence counterclockwise along the 20-mile arc to
intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35[deg]26'49'' N., long.
81[deg]12'44'' W.; thence north along U.S. Highway 321 to intersect
the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc at lat. 35[deg]32'26'' N., long.
81[deg]13'44'' W.; thence clockwise along the 25-mile arc to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 337[deg] radial; thence northwest
along the 337[deg] radial to the point of beginning.
Area I. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 062[deg] radial, 30-mile fix, thence southwest
along the 062[deg] radial to the 25-mile fix; thence clockwise along
the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 120[deg]
radial; thence southeast along the 120[deg] radial to the 30-mile
fix; thence clockwise along the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc to
lat. 34[deg]44'58'' N., long. 80[deg]39'47'' W.; thence north direct
to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat.
34[deg]56'07'' N., long. 80[deg]41'23'' W.; thence counterclockwise
along the 20-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 067[deg] radial;
thence northeast along the 067[deg] radial to the 23-mile arc;
thence counterclockwise along the 23-mile arc to long.
80[deg]46'00'' W.; thence north along long. 80[deg]46'00'' W., to
the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc; thence clockwise along the 30-
mile arc to the point of beginning.
Area J. That airspace extending upward from 4,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 147[deg] radial 25-mile fix; thence direct to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc at lat. 34[deg]44'58''
N., long. 80[deg]39'47'' W.; thence clockwise along the Charlotte
VOR/DME 30-mile arc to lat. 34[deg]44'01'' N., long. 81[deg]12'05''
W.; thence north to intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc at
lat. 34[deg]49'37'' N., long. 81[deg]12'05'' W.; thence
counterclockwise along the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc to the
point of beginning.
Area K. That airspace extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL to
and including 10,000 feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at the
Charlotte VOR/DME 293[deg] radial, 30-mile fix; thence clockwise
along the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc to lat. 35[deg]41'30'' N.,
long. 80[deg]57'40'' W.; thence southwest direct to intersect the
Charlotte VOR/DME 337[deg] at lat. 35[deg]37'15'' N., long.
81[deg]10'32'' W.; thence southeast along the 337[deg] radial to the
Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence counterclockwise along the 25-
mile arc to intersect U.S. Highway 321 at lat. 35[deg]32'26'' N.,
long. 81[deg]13'44'' W., thence south along new Highway 321 to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 20-mile arc at lat. 35[deg]26'49''
N., long. 81[deg]12'44'' W.; thence counterclockwise along the 20-
mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 218[deg] radial; thence south to
intersect the Charlotte VOR/DME 30-mile arc at lat. 34[deg]44'01''
N., long. 81[deg]12'05'' W.; thence clockwise along the 30-mile arc
to the Charlotte VOR/DME 242[deg] radial, thence northeast along the
242[deg] radial to the Charlotte VOR/DME 25-mile arc; thence
clockwise along the 25-mile arc to the Charlotte VOR/DME 293[deg]
radial; thence northwest along the 293[deg] radial to the point of
beginning.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2010.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 69870]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16NO10.000
[FR Doc. 2010-28399 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C