Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes, 69609-69611 [2010-28604]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009–
0268, dated December 17, 2009; Fokker
Service Bulletin SBF100–32–157, Revision 1,
dated October 7, 2009; and Goodrich Service
Bulletin 41350–32–25, dated January 30,
2009; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 3, 2010.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–28606 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1113; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–121–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 12, 2010
Jkt 223001
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice
piccolo tube containing a deliberate small
breach, it was determined that the wing
leading edge thermal switches Part Number
(P/N) 601R59320–1 were not detecting the
consequent bleed leak at the design
threshold. As a result, Airworthiness
Limitation (AWL) tasks, consisting of a
functional check of the wing leading edge
thermal switches (P/N 601R59320–1) and an
inspection of the wing anti-ice duct piccolo
tubes on aeroplanes with these switches
installed, have been introduced. These tasks
will limit exposure to dormant failure of the
wing leading edge thermal switches in the
event of piccolo tube failure, which could
potentially compromise the structural
integrity of the wing leading edge and the
effectiveness of the wing anti-ice system.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is loss of control
of the airplane. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 30,
2010.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401;
e-mail; thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69609
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7318; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–1113; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–121–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day
comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation
authorities of other countries to provide
adequate time for interested parties to
submit comments. The comment period
for these proposed ADs is now typically
45 days, which is consistent with the
comment period for domestic transport
ADs.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2010–12,
dated May 26, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice
piccolo tube containing a deliberate small
breach, it was determined that the wing
leading edge thermal switches Part Number
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
69610
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(P/N) 601R59320–1 were not detecting the
consequent bleed leak at the design
threshold. As a result, Airworthiness
Limitation (AWL) tasks, consisting of a
functional check of the wing leading edge
thermal switches (P/N 601R59320–1) and an
inspection of the wing anti-ice duct piccolo
tubes on aeroplanes with these switches
installed, have been introduced. These tasks
will limit exposure to dormant failure of the
wing leading edge thermal switches in the
event of piccolo tube failure, which could
potentially compromise the structural
integrity of the wing leading edge and the
effectiveness of the wing anti-ice system.
This directive mandates revision of the
approved maintenance schedule to include
the above referenced tasks, including phasein schedules that supersede the phase-in
schedules specified in the AWL tasks.
Note: Thermal switches, P/N 601R59320–
1, were installed in production on aircraft
Serial Numbers (S/N) 7213 and subsequent.
Service Bulletin 601R–30–022 covered inservice installation of these switches on
aircraft S/Ns 7003 through 7212.
The unsafe condition is loss of control
of the airplane. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Temporary
Revisions (TR) 2A–49 and TR 2A–50,
both dated November 17, 2009, to
Appendix A, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier CL–
600–2B19 Maintenance Requirements
Manual. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:45 Nov 12, 2010
Jkt 223001
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 628 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$53,380, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2010–
1113; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–
121–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 30, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100
& 440) airplanes; certificated in any category;
serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice
piccolo tube containing a deliberate small
breach, it was determined that the wing
leading edge thermal switches Part Number
(P/N) 601R59320–1 were not detecting the
consequent bleed leak at the design
threshold. As a result, Airworthiness
Limitation (AWL) tasks, consisting of a
functional check of the wing leading edge
thermal switches (P/N 601R59320–1) and an
inspection of the wing anti-ice duct piccolo
tubes on aeroplanes with these switches
installed, have been introduced. These tasks
will limit exposure to dormant failure of the
wing leading edge thermal switches in the
event of piccolo tube failure, which could
potentially compromise the structural
integrity of the wing leading edge and the
effectiveness of the wing anti-ice system.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is loss of control of
the airplane.
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, revise the Airworthiness
Limitations section (ALS) of the Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) by
incorporating Task Number C36–20–133–03
specified in Bombardier Temporary Revision
(TR) 2A–50, dated November 17, 2009; and
Task Number C30–10–133–01 specified in
Bombardier TR 2A–49, dated November 17,
2009; into Appendix A, ‘‘Certification
Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2 of the
Bombardier CL–600–2B19 Maintenance
Requirements Manual (MRM). For these
tasks, the initial compliance time starts at the
applicable time specified in paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, except as
provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, no
alternative functional check of the thermal
switch or detailed visual inspection of the
piccolo tube may be approved.
Note 1: The actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD may be done by inserting a
copy of Bombardier TR 2A–49 and TR 2A–
50, both dated November 17, 2009, into the
Appendix A of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL–
600–2B19 MRM. When these TRs have been
included in Appendix A of Part 2 of the
general revisions of the MRM, the general
revisions may be inserted in the MRM,
provided that the relevant information in the
general revision is identical to that in
Bombardier TR 2A–49 and TR 2A–50, both
dated November 17, 2009.
(1) For Task Number C36–20–133–03, the
initial compliance time is before the
accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours or
within 7 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For Task Number C30–10–133–01, the
initial compliance time is before the
accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on
the piccolo tube or within 7 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2010–12, dated May 26, 2010;
and Bombardier TR 2A–49, dated November
17, 2009, and Bombardier TR 2A–50, dated
November 17, 2009 to Appendix A,
‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’ of
Part 2 of the Bombardier CL–600–2B19 MRM;
for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 3, 2010.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–28604 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0960; Directorate
Identifier 98–ANE–09–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA AD Differences
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc RB211–Trent 768, 772, and 772B
Turbofan Engines
AGENCY:
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York,
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 12, 2010
Jkt 223001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); rescission.
We propose to rescind an
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. The existing AD,
AD 98–09–27, resulted from aircraft
certification testing which revealed that
stresses on the thrust reverser hinge
were higher than had been anticipated
during engine certification, and the
United Kingdom Civil Aviation
Authority, issuing AD 008–03–97.
Since we issued AD 98–09–27, we
discovered that its requirements were
duplicated in airplane-level AD 2001–
09–14, issued by the FAA Transport
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69611
Airplane Directorate. This proposal to
rescind the engine-level AD allows the
public the opportunity to comment on
the FAA’s determination of the
duplication of requirements in another
AD, before we rescind the engine-level
AD.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 30,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (phone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: alan.strom@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7143; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD rescission. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0960; Directorate Identifier
98–ANE–09–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD rescission.
We will consider all comments received
by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD rescission based on those
comments.
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69609-69611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28604]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1113; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-121-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice piccolo tube containing
a deliberate small breach, it was determined that the wing leading
edge thermal switches Part Number (P/N) 601R59320-1 were not
detecting the consequent bleed leak at the design threshold. As a
result, Airworthiness Limitation (AWL) tasks, consisting of a
functional check of the wing leading edge thermal switches (P/N
601R59320-1) and an inspection of the wing anti-ice duct piccolo
tubes on aeroplanes with these switches installed, have been
introduced. These tasks will limit exposure to dormant failure of
the wing leading edge thermal switches in the event of piccolo tube
failure, which could potentially compromise the structural integrity
of the wing leading edge and the effectiveness of the wing anti-ice
system.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is loss of control of the airplane. The
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 30,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail;
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1113;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-121-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2010-12, dated May 26, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice piccolo tube containing
a deliberate small breach, it was determined that the wing leading
edge thermal switches Part Number
[[Page 69610]]
(P/N) 601R59320-1 were not detecting the consequent bleed leak at
the design threshold. As a result, Airworthiness Limitation (AWL)
tasks, consisting of a functional check of the wing leading edge
thermal switches (P/N 601R59320-1) and an inspection of the wing
anti-ice duct piccolo tubes on aeroplanes with these switches
installed, have been introduced. These tasks will limit exposure to
dormant failure of the wing leading edge thermal switches in the
event of piccolo tube failure, which could potentially compromise
the structural integrity of the wing leading edge and the
effectiveness of the wing anti-ice system.
This directive mandates revision of the approved maintenance
schedule to include the above referenced tasks, including phase-in
schedules that supersede the phase-in schedules specified in the AWL
tasks.
Note: Thermal switches, P/N 601R59320-1, were installed in
production on aircraft Serial Numbers (S/N) 7213 and subsequent.
Service Bulletin 601R-30-022 covered in-service installation of
these switches on aircraft S/Ns 7003 through 7212.
The unsafe condition is loss of control of the airplane. You may
obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Temporary Revisions (TR) 2A-49 and TR 2A-50,
both dated November 17, 2009, to Appendix A, ``Certification
Maintenance Requirements,'' of Part 2, ``Airworthiness Limitations,''
of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 628 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $53,380, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2010-1113; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-121-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 30, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes; certificated in any
category; serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During flight-testing of a wing anti-ice piccolo tube containing
a deliberate small breach, it was determined that the wing leading
edge thermal switches Part Number (P/N) 601R59320-1 were not
detecting the consequent bleed leak at the design threshold. As a
result, Airworthiness Limitation (AWL) tasks, consisting of a
functional check of the wing leading edge thermal switches (P/N
601R59320-1) and an inspection of the wing anti-ice duct piccolo
tubes on aeroplanes with these switches installed, have been
introduced. These tasks will limit exposure to dormant failure of
the wing leading edge thermal switches in the event of piccolo tube
failure, which could potentially compromise the structural integrity
of the wing leading edge and the effectiveness of the wing anti-ice
system.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is loss of control of the airplane.
[[Page 69611]]
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the Airworthiness Limitations section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) by incorporating Task Number C36-20-
133-03 specified in Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) 2A-50, dated
November 17, 2009; and Task Number C30-10-133-01 specified in
Bombardier TR 2A-49, dated November 17, 2009; into Appendix A,
``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' of Part 2 of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). For
these tasks, the initial compliance time starts at the applicable
time specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, no
alternative functional check of the thermal switch or detailed
visual inspection of the piccolo tube may be approved.
Note 1: The actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD may be
done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR 2A-49 and TR 2A-50, both
dated November 17, 2009, into the Appendix A of Part 2 of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM. When these TRs have been included in
Appendix A of Part 2 of the general revisions of the MRM, the
general revisions may be inserted in the MRM, provided that the
relevant information in the general revision is identical to that in
Bombardier TR 2A-49 and TR 2A-50, both dated November 17, 2009.
(1) For Task Number C36-20-133-03, the initial compliance time
is before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours or within 7
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For Task Number C30-10-133-01, the initial compliance time
is before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on the
piccolo tube or within 7 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-12,
dated May 26, 2010; and Bombardier TR 2A-49, dated November 17,
2009, and Bombardier TR 2A-50, dated November 17, 2009 to Appendix
A, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' of Part 2 of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 MRM; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 3, 2010.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28604 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P