Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of Important Safety Information; Availability, 69449-69451 [2010-28440]
Download as PDF
69449
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1—Continued
Annual
frequency per
response
Number of
respondents
CFR section
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
821.25(d) ..............................................................................
1
1
1
1
1
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
915
1
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
Number of
recordkeepers
Annual
frequency of
recordkeeping
821.25(b) ..............................................................................
821.25(c)2 ............................................................................
821.25(c)(3) ..........................................................................
12
12
12
46,260
1
1,124
555,120
12
13,488
1
63
1
555,120
756
13,488
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
569,364
CFR section
1
2
Total annual
records
Hours per
record
Total hours
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
One time burden.
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN1
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Annual
frequency of
disclosure
Total annual
disclosures
Hours per
disclosure
Total hours
821.30(a) and (b) .................................................................
821.30(c) and (d) .................................................................
17,000
17,000
1
1
17,000
17,000
1
1
17,000
17,000
Total Hours ...................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
34,000
1
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The annual hourly burden for
respondents involved with medical
device tracking is estimated to be
604,279 hours per year. The burden
estimates cited in tables 1, 2, and 3 of
this document are based on the number
of device tracking orders issued in the
last 3 years.
This regulation also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections of
information found in 21 CFR 821.2(b),
821.25(e), and 821.30(e) have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0183.
Dated: November 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–28441 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0319]
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff on Dear
Health Care Provider Letters:
Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry and FDA staff entitled ‘‘Dear
Health Care Provider Letters: Improving
Communication of Important Safety
Information.’’ Dear Health Care Provider
(DHCP) Letters are correspondence—
usually in the form of a mass mailing
from the manufacturer or distributor of
a human drug or biologic, or from
FDA—intended to alert physicians and
other health care providers to important
new information about a marketed drug
or biological product. This draft
guidance provides recommendations on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
when to use a DHCP letter, the types of
information to include in a DHCP letter,
how to organize that information, and
formatting techniques to make the
information more accessible. The draft
guidance is intended to improve the
quality of DHCP letters to make them
more effective communication tools for
new information about marketed
products.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by January 11,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, or the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448. Send one
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
69450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
self-addressed adhesive label to assist
those offices in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandy Benton, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 4206,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–2270; or Stephen Ripley,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM–17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852–1448,
301–827–6210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry and FDA
staff entitled ‘‘Dear Health Care Provider
Letters: Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information.’’
Important new information about
prescription drug and biological
products emerges throughout a
product’s lifecycle. For marketed
products, there may be occasions when
it is important to communicate new
information promptly to health care
practitioners involved in prescribing or
dispensing a drug, or in caring for
patients who receive a drug. The DHCP
letter is an important mechanism (one of
a number of different mechanisms) used
to communicate important new
information to health care professionals
about a marketed product.
Formal and informal evaluations of
DHCP letters have shown that the
communication quality of DHCP
letters—the extent to which the
information is accessible and can be
understood—varies widely. A study
reported in 2005 evaluated the quality
of a group of DHCP letters sent during
2000 and 2001 that were intended to
communicate important new drug safety
information.1 The study found that
there is a correlation between the
quality or perceived quality of a DHCP
letter and the extent to which
physicians perceive the new
information as important. Letters that
were evaluated as clearer, more concise,
better organized and formatted, and
focused on the most important aspects
of the new safety information were
considered to be more effective in
communicating the new information.
FDA believes guidance concerning the
format and content of the DHCP letter
would be beneficial in improving the
effectiveness of DHCP letters in
communicating drug information.
Accordingly, this draft guidance
contains recommendations on when to
use a DHCP letter, what types of
information to include in a DHCP letter,
how to organize that information, and
formatting techniques to make the
information in the letter more
accessible.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on the format and content of DHCP
letters. It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), Federal Agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information that they conduct or
sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register for each proposed
collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing this
notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of
information associated with this draft
guidance, FDA invites comments on the
following topics: (1) Whether the
proposed information collected is
necessary for the proper performance of
FDA’s functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimated
burden of the proposed information
collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
information collected on the
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
Based on a review of MedWatch
Safety Alerts for 2008 and 2009, we
identified each Dear Health Care
Provider Letter sent and the identity of
each sponsor sending out a Dear Health
Care Provider Letter for each year. We
estimate that we will receive
approximately 30 Dear Health Care
Provider letters annually from
approximately 25 application holders.
FDA professionals familiar with Dear
Health Care Provider Letters and with
the recommendations in the draft
guidance estimate that it should take an
application holder approximately 100
hours to prepare and send Dear Health
Care Provider Letters in accordance
with the draft guidance. Therefore we
estimate the annual reporting burden as
follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Annual Average ...................................................................
1 There
Number of
responses per
respondent
25
Total
responses
1.20
30
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
1 Mazor K, S. Andrade, J. Auger, et al.,
‘‘Communicating Safety Information to Physicians:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
An Examination of Dear Doctor Letters,’’
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety, 14:869–875, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Hours per
response
100
Total hours
3,000
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices
In the draft guidance, we refer to an
earlier guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Using Electronic Means to Distribute
Certain Product Information’’ (71 FR
26102, May 3, 2006). That guidance
referred to previously approved
collections of information found in FDA
regulations that are subject to review by
OMB. The collections of information in
that guidance have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0249.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.
gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–28440 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed
Meetings
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 10, 2010
Jkt 223001
69451
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special
Emphasis Panel; Microbicide Innovation
Program (MIP VI) (R21/R33).
Date: December 2–3, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites—Chevy Chase
Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd. NW., Tenleytown
Ballroom, Washington, DC 20015.
Contact Person: Roberta Binder, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review
Program, Division of Extramural Activities,
NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive,
Room 3130, Bethesda, MD 20892–7616, (301)
496–7966, rbinder@niaid.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special
Emphasis Panel; Support for Conference and
Scientific Meetings.
Date: December 6–8, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817
(Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person: B. Duane Price, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review
Program, DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA, Room
3139, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616,
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–451–2592,
pricebd@niaid.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special
Emphasis Panel; Unsolicited R24.
Date: December 6, 2010.
Time: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Division of
Extramural Activites, NIAID/NIH/DHHS,
6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3129,
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–3564,
ec17w@nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology,
and Transplantation Research; 93.856,
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
National Institutes of Health
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–28457 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
PO 00000
National Institute of Dental &
Craniofacial Research; Notice of
Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of a meeting of the Board
of Scientific Counselors, National
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial
Research.
The meeting will be closed to the
public as indicated below in accordance
with the provisions set forth in section
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended
for the review, discussion, and
evaluation of individual intramural
programs and projects conducted by the
National Institute of Dental &
Craniofacial Research, including
consideration of personnel
qualifications and performance, and the
competence of individual investigators,
the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Board of Scientific
Counselors, National Institute of Dental and
Craniofacial Research.
Date: December 12–13, 2010.
Time: December 12, 2010, 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate personal
qualifications and performance, and
competence of individual investigators.
Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda
(Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 8120
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Time: December 13, 2010, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate personal
qualifications and performance, and
competence of individual investigators.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Building 30, 30 Center Drive, 117, Bethesda,
MD 20892.
Contact Person: Alicia J. Dombroski, PhD,
Director, Division of Extramural Activities,
Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial Research,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
20892.
Information is also available on the
Institute’s/Center’s home page: https://
www.nidcr.nih.gov/about/Council
Committees.asp, where an agenda and any
additional information for the meeting will
be posted when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and
Disorders Research, National Institutes of
Health, HHS)
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–28460 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69449-69451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28440]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0319]
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration
Staff on Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry and FDA staff entitled
``Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information.'' Dear Health Care Provider (DHCP)
Letters are correspondence--usually in the form of a mass mailing from
the manufacturer or distributor of a human drug or biologic, or from
FDA--intended to alert physicians and other health care providers to
important new information about a marketed drug or biological product.
This draft guidance provides recommendations on when to use a DHCP
letter, the types of information to include in a DHCP letter, how to
organize that information, and formatting techniques to make the
information more accessible. The draft guidance is intended to improve
the quality of DHCP letters to make them more effective communication
tools for new information about marketed products.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by January 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or
the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development (HFM-40), Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448. Send one
[[Page 69450]]
self-addressed adhesive label to assist those offices in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandy Benton, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 4206, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2270; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM-17), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike,
suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448, 301-827-6210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
and FDA staff entitled ``Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving
Communication of Important Safety Information.'' Important new
information about prescription drug and biological products emerges
throughout a product's lifecycle. For marketed products, there may be
occasions when it is important to communicate new information promptly
to health care practitioners involved in prescribing or dispensing a
drug, or in caring for patients who receive a drug. The DHCP letter is
an important mechanism (one of a number of different mechanisms) used
to communicate important new information to health care professionals
about a marketed product.
Formal and informal evaluations of DHCP letters have shown that the
communication quality of DHCP letters--the extent to which the
information is accessible and can be understood--varies widely. A study
reported in 2005 evaluated the quality of a group of DHCP letters sent
during 2000 and 2001 that were intended to communicate important new
drug safety information.\1\ The study found that there is a correlation
between the quality or perceived quality of a DHCP letter and the
extent to which physicians perceive the new information as important.
Letters that were evaluated as clearer, more concise, better organized
and formatted, and focused on the most important aspects of the new
safety information were considered to be more effective in
communicating the new information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Mazor K, S. Andrade, J. Auger, et al., ``Communicating
Safety Information to Physicians: An Examination of Dear Doctor
Letters,'' Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety, 14:869-875, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes guidance concerning the format and content of the DHCP
letter would be beneficial in improving the effectiveness of DHCP
letters in communicating drug information. Accordingly, this draft
guidance contains recommendations on when to use a DHCP letter, what
types of information to include in a DHCP letter, how to organize that
information, and formatting techniques to make the information in the
letter more accessible.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on the format
and content of DHCP letters. It does not create or confer any rights
for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information that
they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of information associated with this
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of
the proposed information collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of information collected on the respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Based on a review of MedWatch Safety Alerts for 2008 and 2009, we
identified each Dear Health Care Provider Letter sent and the identity
of each sponsor sending out a Dear Health Care Provider Letter for each
year. We estimate that we will receive approximately 30 Dear Health
Care Provider letters annually from approximately 25 application
holders. FDA professionals familiar with Dear Health Care Provider
Letters and with the recommendations in the draft guidance estimate
that it should take an application holder approximately 100 hours to
prepare and send Dear Health Care Provider Letters in accordance with
the draft guidance. Therefore we estimate the annual reporting burden
as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Number of responses per Total Hours per Total hours
respondents respondent responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Average.................. 25 1.20 30 100 3,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
[[Page 69451]]
In the draft guidance, we refer to an earlier guidance for industry
entitled ``Using Electronic Means to Distribute Certain Product
Information'' (71 FR 26102, May 3, 2006). That guidance referred to
previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations
that are subject to review by OMB. The collections of information in
that guidance have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0249.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28440 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P