Foreign-Trade Zone 226-Merced, Madera, Fresno, and Tulare Counties, California; Site Renumbering Notice, 69057-69058 [2010-28409]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Notices proceeding after this margin was selected in calculating the rate for the PRC-wide entity in the investigation’s Innersprings Investigation Prelim.17 As there is no information on the record of this review that demonstrates that this rate is not appropriate for use as AFA, we determine that this rate continues to have relevance. As the 234.51 percent rate is both reliable and relevant, we determine that it has probative value and is corroborated to the extent practicable, in accordance with section 776(c) of the Act. Therefore, we have assigned this AFA rate to exports of the subject merchandise by the PRC-wide entity. Preliminary Results of Review The Department has determined that the following preliminary dumping margin exists for the period August 6, 2008–January 31, 2010: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES INNERSPRINGS FROM THE PRC information pursuant to section 351.301(c)(1) of the Department’s regulations.19 Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.20 Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written comments, limited to issues raised in such briefs or comments, may be filed no later than 37 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.21 The Department urges interested parties to provide an executive summary of each argument contained within the case briefs and rebuttal briefs. The Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such comments, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Margin Manufacturer/Exporter (percent) Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP 18 ................ PRC-wide Entity 234.51 shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this In accordance with section review. The Department intends to issue 351.301(c)(3)(ii) of the Department’s assessment instructions to CBP 15 days regulations, for purposes of the final after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, results of this review excluding any interested parties may submit publicly available information to value factors of reported sales that entered during the production within 20 days after the date gap period. of publication of these preliminary Cash Deposit Requirements results. Interested parties must provide The following cash-deposit the Department with supporting requirements will be effective upon documentation for the publicly publication of these final results for available information to value each shipments of the subject merchandise factor of production. Additionally, in entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, accordance with section 351.301(c)(1) of for consumption on or after the the Department’s regulations, for publication date of these final results, as purposes of the final results of this provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the administrative review, interested parties Act: (1) For subject merchandise may submit factual information to rebut, exported by Jingxin and Top One the clarify, or correct factual information cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide submitted by an interested party less rate of 234.51 percent; (2) for all other than ten days before, on, or after, the PRC exporters of subject merchandise applicable deadline for submission of which have not been found to be such factual information. However, the entitled to a separate rate, and thus, are Department notes that section a part of the PRC-wide entity, the cash351.301(c)(1) of the Department’s deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate regulations permits new information of 234.51 percent; and (3) for all nononly insofar as it rebuts, clarifies, or PRC exporters of subject merchandise, corrects information recently placed on the cash-deposit rate will be the rate the record. The Department generally applicable to the PRC supplier of that cannot accept the submission of additional, previously absent-from-the19 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of record alternative surrogate value China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 17 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45729 (August 6, 2008) (‘‘Innersprings Investigation Prelim’’). 18 The PRC-wide entity includes Jingxin and Top One. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:25 Nov 09, 2010 Jkt 223001 Administrative Review and Final Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. 20 See section 351.309(c)(ii) of the Department’s regulations. 21 See section 351.309(d) of the Department’s regulations. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 69057 exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification of Interested Parties This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department’s regulations to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This administrative review, and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and sections 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4) of the Department’s regulations. Dated: October 27, 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–28415 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board Foreign-Trade Zone 226—Merced, Madera, Fresno, and Tulare Counties, California; Site Renumbering Notice Foreign-Trade Zone 226 was approved by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board on December 22, 1997 (Board Order 946, 63 FR 778–779, 01/07/98) and expanded on May 14, 2003 (Board Order 1276, 68 FR 27985, 05/22/03). FTZ 226 currently consists of 12 ‘‘Sites’’ totaling some 2,424 acres located within and adjacent to the Fresno Customs port of entry area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries that have previously been approved, but instead involves an administrative renumbering of existing Site 4A to separate unrelated, noncontiguous sites for recordkeeping purposes. Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 226 will be as follows: Site 1 (791 acres)—Castle Airport (formerly Castle Air Force Base) Morimoto Industrial Park, 3450 C Street, Atwater (Merced County); Site 2 (242 acres)—within the MidState 99 Distribution Center, Visalia (Tulare County) (includes 65 acres located at 2525 North Plaza Drive approved on a temporary basis until 3/1/11); Site 3 (191 acres)—Mid Cal Business Park, Highway 33, Gustine E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1 69058 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Notices (Merced County); Site 4 (101 acres)— within the Applegate Business Park, Highway 33, Air Park Road, Atwater (Merced County); Site 6 (87 acres)—City of Madera Airport Industrial Park/State Center Commerce Park, Falcon Drive, Madera (Madera County); Site 7 (10 acres)—City of Madera Industrial Park, 2500 West Industrial Avenue, Madera (Madera County); Site 8 (102 acres)— Airways East Business Park, East Shields Avenue, Fresno (Fresno County); Site 9 (225 acres)—Central Valley Business Park, East North Avenue, Fresno (Fresno County); Site 10 (497 acres)—consisting of the Fresno Airport Industrial Park area located on Aircorp Way and at the intersection of E. Anderson and E. Clinton Avenues, Fresno, and the adjacent City of Clovis Industrial Park located at the intersection of West Dakota Avenue & West Pontiac Way, Clovis (Fresno County); Site 11 (35 acres)—Reedley Industrial Park II, 1301 South Buttonwillow Avenue, Reedley (Fresno County); Site 12 (128 acres)—City of Selma Industrial Park, East Nebraska Avenue, Selma (Fresno County); and, Site 13 (15 acres)—located at 810 E. Continental Avenue, Tulare, (Tulare County). For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at Christopher. Kemp@trade.gov or (202) 482–0862. Dated: November 4, 2010. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–28409 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Request for Comment on a Proposal to Exempt, Pursuant to the Authority in Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index and Similar Products Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ACTION: Notice of Proposed Order and Request for Comment. AGENCY: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 17 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:25 Nov 09, 2010 Jkt 223001 U.S.C. 1 et seq. U.S.C. 6(c). 3 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. The Commission has provided exemptions for gold and silver ETF products on three prior occasions. See Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to SPDR® Gold Trust Shares, 73 FR 31981 (June 5, 2008), Exemptive Order for SPDR® Gold Futures Contracts, 73 FR 31979 (June 5, 2008), Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to iShares® COMEX Gold Trust Shares and iShares® Silver Trust Shares, 73 FR 79830 (December 30, 2008), and Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares, 75 FR 37406 (June 29, 2010) (collectively, the ‘‘Previous Orders’’). 27 The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’) is proposing to exempt the trading and clearing of certain contracts called ‘‘options’’ (‘‘Options’’) on the CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index (‘‘GVZ Index’’), which would be traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’), a national securities exchange, and cleared through the SUMMARY: Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in its capacity as a registered securities clearing agency, from the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) 1 and the regulations thereunder, to the extent necessary to permit such Options on the GVZ Index to be so traded and cleared. Authority for this exemption is found in Section 4(c) of the CEA.2 The Commission is also requesting comment regarding whether the Commission should provide a categorical exemption that would permit the trading and clearing of options on indexes that measure the volatility of shares of gold exchange-traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’) generally, regardless of issuer, including options on any index that measures the magnitude of changes in, and is composed of the price(s) of shares of one or more gold ETFs and the price(s) of any other instrument(s), which other instruments are securities as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘the ’34 Act’’).3 DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 10, 2010. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: goldvolatility4c@cftc.gov. Include ‘‘Options on GVZ Index and Similar Products’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: 202–418–5521. • Mail: Send to David A. Stawick, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. • Courier: Same as mail above. All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments may be posted as received to http:// www.cftc.gov. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. If you wish the Commission to consider information that may be exempt from disclosure PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 under the Freedom of Information Act, a petition for confidential treatment of the exempt information may be submitted according to the established procedures in CFTC Regulation 145.9. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert B. Wasserman, Associate Director, 202–418–5092, rwasserman@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, or Anne C. Polaski, Special Counsel, 312–596–0575, apolaski@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 525 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1100, Chicago, Illinois 60661. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The OCC is both a Derivatives Clearing Organization (‘‘DCO’’) registered pursuant to Section 5b of the CEA,4 and a securities clearing agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the ’34 Act.5 OCC has filed with the CFTC, pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the CEA and Commission Regulations 39.4(a) and 40.5 thereunder,6 a request for approval of a rule that would enable OCC to clear and settle Options on the GVZ Index traded on the CBOE, a national securities exchange, in its capacity as a registered securities clearing agency (and not in its capacity as a DCO).7 Section 5c(c)(3) of the CEA provides that the CFTC must approve such a rule submitted for approval unless it finds that the rule would violate the CEA. The GVZ Index is an index that measures the implied volatility of options on shares of the SPDR® Gold Trust (‘‘SPDR® Gold Trust Shares’’), an ETF designed to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion.8 47 U.S.C. 7a–1. U.S.C. 78q–l. 6 7 U.S.C. 7a–2(c), 17 CFR 39.4(a), 40.5. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62094 (May 13, 2010), 75 FR 28085 (May 19, 2010) (File No. SR–OCC–2010–07 filed with both the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’)) and the SEC’s approval in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62290 (June 14, 2010), 75 FR 35861 (June 23, 2010). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62139 (May 19, 2010), 75 FR 29597 (May 26, 2010) (SEC approval of the CBOE’s listing and trading of Options on the GVZ Index). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50603 (October 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614 (November 5, 2004) (original GLD Approval Order for listing and trading on the NYSE). 5 15 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69057-69058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board


Foreign-Trade Zone 226--Merced, Madera, Fresno, and Tulare 
Counties, California; Site Renumbering Notice

    Foreign-Trade Zone 226 was approved by the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board on December 22, 1997 (Board Order 946, 63 FR 778-779, 01/07/98) 
and expanded on May 14, 2003 (Board Order 1276, 68 FR 27985, 05/22/03).
    FTZ 226 currently consists of 12 ``Sites'' totaling some 2,424 
acres located within and adjacent to the Fresno Customs port of entry 
area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries that 
have previously been approved, but instead involves an administrative 
renumbering of existing Site 4A to separate unrelated, non-contiguous 
sites for recordkeeping purposes.
    Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 226 will be as follows: 
Site 1 (791 acres)--Castle Airport (formerly Castle Air Force Base) 
Morimoto Industrial Park, 3450 C Street, Atwater (Merced County); Site 
2 (242 acres)--within the MidState 99 Distribution Center, Visalia 
(Tulare County) (includes 65 acres located at 2525 North Plaza Drive 
approved on a temporary basis until 3/1/11); Site 3 (191 acres)--Mid 
Cal Business Park, Highway 33, Gustine

[[Page 69058]]

(Merced County); Site 4 (101 acres)--within the Applegate Business 
Park, Highway 33, Air Park Road, Atwater (Merced County); Site 6 (87 
acres)--City of Madera Airport Industrial Park/State Center Commerce 
Park, Falcon Drive, Madera (Madera County); Site 7 (10 acres)--City of 
Madera Industrial Park, 2500 West Industrial Avenue, Madera (Madera 
County); Site 8 (102 acres)--Airways East Business Park, East Shields 
Avenue, Fresno (Fresno County); Site 9 (225 acres)--Central Valley 
Business Park, East North Avenue, Fresno (Fresno County); Site 10 (497 
acres)--consisting of the Fresno Airport Industrial Park area located 
on Aircorp Way and at the intersection of E. Anderson and E. Clinton 
Avenues, Fresno, and the adjacent City of Clovis Industrial Park 
located at the intersection of West Dakota Avenue & West Pontiac Way, 
Clovis (Fresno County); Site 11 (35 acres)--Reedley Industrial Park II, 
1301 South Buttonwillow Avenue, Reedley (Fresno County); Site 12 (128 
acres)--City of Selma Industrial Park, East Nebraska Avenue, Selma 
(Fresno County); and, Site 13 (15 acres)--located at 810 E. Continental 
Avenue, Tulare, (Tulare County).
    For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at 
Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov or (202) 482-0862.

    Dated: November 4, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28409 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P