Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of Tissue Adhesive With Adjunct Wound Closure Device Intended for Topical Approximation of Skin, 68972-68974 [2010-28356]
Download as PDF
68972
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
and Surveillance Facility, Virginia
Capes (FACSFAC VACAPES), NAS
Oceana, Virginia Beach, VA’’ and
inserting the words ‘‘Using agency. U.S.
Navy, Fleet Area Control and
Surveillance Facility, Virginia Capes
(FACSFAC VACAPES), Virginia Beach,
VA.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 4,
2010.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2010–28388 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 510
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0002]
New Animal Drugs; Change of
Sponsor’s Name
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect a
change of sponsor’s name from North
American Nutrition Companies, Inc., to
Provimi North America, Inc.
DATES: This rule is effective November
10, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven D. Vaughn, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 7520 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8300,
E-mail: steven.vaughn@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: North
American Nutrition Companies, Inc.,
6531 State Rte. 503, Lewisburg, OH
45338, has informed FDA that it has
changed its name to Provimi North
America, Inc. Accordingly, the Agency
is amending the regulations in 21 CFR
510.600 to reflect this change.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in
5 U.S.C. 801–808.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 510 is amended as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 510 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 360b, 371, 379e.
2. In § 510.600, in the table in
paragraph (c)(1), remove the entry for
‘‘North American Nutrition Companies,
Inc.’’; and alphabetically add a new
entry for ‘‘Provimi North America, Inc.’’;
and in the table in paragraph (c)(2),
revise the entry for ‘‘017790’’ to read as
follows:
■
Jkt 223001
21 CFR Part 878
Medical Devices; General and Plastic
Surgery Devices; Classification of
Tissue Adhesive With Adjunct Wound
Closure Device Intended for Topical
Approximation of Skin
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
tissue adhesive with adjunct wound
closure device intended for topical
approximation into class II (special
controls). The special control that will
§ 510.600 Names, addresses, and drug
apply to the device is the guidance
labeler codes of sponsors of approved
document entitled ‘‘Guidance for
applications.
Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
*
*
*
*
*
Controls Guidance Document: Tissue
(c) * * *
Adhesive With Adjunct Wound Closure
(1) * * *
Device Intended for the Topical
Approximation of Skin.’’ The agency is
Drug labeler
classifying the device into class II
Firm name and address
code
(special controls) in order to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in
*
*
*
*
*
this issue of the Federal Register, FDA
Provimi North America, Inc.,
is announcing the availability of a
6531 State Rte. 503,
Lewisburg, OH 45338 .......
017790 guidance document that will serve as
the special control for this device type.
DATES: This final rule is effective
*
*
*
*
*
December 10, 2010. The classification
was effective April 30, 2010.
(2) * * *
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Drug labeler code
Firm name and address George J. Mattamal, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, Bldg. 66, Rm. 4617,
*
*
*
*
*
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver
017790 ................... Provimi North America,
Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6396.
Inc., 6531 State Rte.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
503, Lewisburg, OH
45338.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Steven D. Vaughn,
Director, Office of New Animal Drug
Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2010–28307 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
Administrative practice and
procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14:24 Nov 09, 2010
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0512]
PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY:
I. What is the background of this
rulemaking?
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.)
as amended by the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976 (the 1976
amendments) (Pub. L. 94–295), the Safe
Medical Devices Act of 1990 (Pub. L.
101–629), and the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act (Pub.
L. 107–250) established a
comprehensive system for the regulation
of medical devices intended for human
use. Section 513 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 306c) established three categories
(classes) of devices, depending on the
regulatory controls needed to provide
reasonable assurance of their safety and
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
effectiveness. The three categories of
devices are class I (general controls),
class II (special controls), and class III
(premarket approval).
FDA refers to devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the 1976
amendments), as postamendments
devices. Postamendments devices are
classified automatically by statute
(section 513(f) of the FD&C Act) into
class III without any FDA rulemaking
process. These devices remain in class
III and require premarket approval,
unless: (1) FDA reclassifies the device
into class I or II; (2) FDA issues an order
classifying the device into class I or
class II in accordance with section
513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act; or FDA issues
an order finding the device to be
substantially equivalent, under section
513(i), to a predicate device that does
not require premarket approval. The
agency determines whether new devices
are substantially equivalent to predicate
devices by means of premarket
notification procedures in section 510(k)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and
21 CFR part 807 of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act
provides that any person who submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified may,
within 30 days after receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
request FDA to classify the device under
the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1).
FDA will, within 60 days of receiving
this request, classify the device by
written order. This classification shall
be the initial classification of the device.
Within 30 days after the issuance of an
order classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
February 25, 2009, classifying the
PRINEO Skin Closure System into class
III, because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, or a
device which was subsequently
reclassified into class I or class II. On
March 23, 2009, Closure Medical Corp.
submitted a petition requesting
classification of the tissue adhesive with
adjunct wound closure device for
topical approximation of skin under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the
device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
petition in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA classifies devices into class II
if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
68973
establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition,
FDA determined that tissue adhesive
with adjunct wound closure device
intended for topical approximation of
skin can be classified into class II with
the establishment of special controls.
FDA believes these special controls will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic
name ‘‘Tissue Adhesive with Adjunct
Wound Closure Device Intended for
Topical Approximation of Skin’’ and it
is identified as tissue adhesive with
adjunct wound closure device intended
for topical approximation of skin. FDA
has identified the following risks to
health associated specifically with this
type of device and the recommended
measures to mitigate these risks.
A. Unintentional bonding of device
due to misapplication of device, device
leaking or running to unintended areas,
etc.
B. Wound dehiscence
C. Adverse tissue reaction and
chemical burns
D. Infection
E. Applicator malfunction
F. Weak bonding leading to loss of
approximation
G. Delayed polymerization
TABLE 1—RISKS TO HEALTH AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Recommended
mitigation measures
Identified risk
Unintentional bonding of device due to misapplication of device, device
leaking or running to unintended areas, etc.
Wound dehiscence ...................................................................................
Adverse tissue reaction and chemical burns ...........................................
Infection ....................................................................................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Applicator malfunction ..............................................................................
Weak bonding leading to loss of approximation ......................................
Delayed polymerization ............................................................................
FDA believes that the special controls
guidance document, in addition to
general controls, addresses the risks to
health identified in table 1 of this
document and provides reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, on April 30,
2010, FDA issued an order to the
petitioner classifying the device into
class II. FDA is codifying this device by
adding § 878.4011 to 21 CFR part 878.
Following the effective date of this
final classification rule, any firm
submitting a 510(k) premarket
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:24 Nov 09, 2010
Jkt 223001
Bench Testing, Labeling.
Bench Testing, Shelf Life Testing, Animal Testing, Clinical Studies, Labeling.
Biocompatibility Animal Testing, Clinical Studies.
Bench Testing, Biocompatibility Animal Testing, Clinical Studies, Sterility.
Bench Testing.
Bench Testing, Animal Testing, Clinical Studies.
Bench Testing, Animal Testing.
notification for tissue adhesive with
adjunct wound closure device intended
for topical approximation of skin will
need to address the issues covered in
the special controls guidance. However,
the firm need only show that its device
meets the recommendations of the
guidance or in some other way provides
equivalent assurance of safety and
effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirement under section 510(k) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FD&C Act, if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device and, therefore, the type of
device is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification prior to marketing the
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
68974
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 10, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
device, which contains information
about the tissue adhesive with adjunct
wound closure intended for topical
approximation of skin that they intend
to market.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
II. What is the environmental impact of
this rule?
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. What is the analysis impact of this
rule?
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4). Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
agency believes that this final rule is not
a significant regulatory action as defined
by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because reclassification of this
device from class III to class II will
relieve manufacturers of the device of
cost of complying with the premarket
approval requirements of section 515 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e), and may
permit small potential competitors to
enter the marketplace by lowering their
costs, the agency certifies that the final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’
The current threshold after
adjustment for inflation is $135 million,
using the most current (2009) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic
Product. FDA does not expect this final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:24 Nov 09, 2010
Jkt 223001
rule to result in any 1-year expenditure
that would meet or exceed this amount.
IV. Does this final rule have Federalism
Implications?
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a)
of the Executive order requires agencies
to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal statute to
preempt State law only where the
statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear
evidence that the Congress intended
preemption of State law, or where the
exercise of State authority conflicts with
the exercise of Federal authority under
the Federal statute.’’ Federal law
includes an express preemption
provision that preempt certain State
requirements ‘‘different from or in
addition to’’ certain Federal
requirements applicable to devices. 21
U.S.C. 360k; See Medtronic v. Lohr, 518
U.S. 470 (1996); Riegel v. Medtronic,
552 U.S. 312 (2008). The special
controls established by this final rule
create ‘‘requirements’’ to address each
identified risk to health presented by
these specific medical devices under 21
U.S.C. 360k, even though product
sponsors have some flexibility in how
they meet those requirements. Cf.
Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107 F.3d
737, 740–42 (9th Cir. 1997).
V. How does this rule comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
This final rule contains no new
collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is issuing a notice
announcing the availability of a
guidance for the final rule. The
guidance, ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Tissue Adhesive
with Adjunct Wound Closure Device
Intended for the Topical Approximation
of Skin,’’ references previously approved
collections of information found in
FDA’s regulations.
VI. What references are on display?
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. Petition from Closure Medical
Corp., March 23, 2009.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC
SURGERY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 878 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 3601, 371.
2. Section 878.4011 is added to
subpart E to read as follows:
■
§ 878.4011 Tissue adhesive with adjunct
wound closure device for topical
approximation of skin.
(a) Identification. A tissue adhesive
with adjunct wound closure device
intended for the topical approximation
of skin is a device indicated for topical
application only to hold closed easily
approximated skin edges of wounds
from surgical incisions, including
punctures from minimally invasive
surgery, and simple, thoroughly
cleansed, trauma-induced lacerations. It
may be used in conjunction with, but
not in place of, deep dermal stitches.
Additionally, the adjunct wound
closure device component maintains
temporary skin edge alignment along
the length of wound during application
of the liquid adhesive.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is FDA’s ‘‘Guidance for Industry
and FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Tissue Adhesive
with Adjunct Wound Closure Device
Intended for the Topical Approximation
of Skin.’’ See § 878.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document.
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–28356 Filed 11–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0998]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Upper Mississippi River, Rock Island,
IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68972-68974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0512]
Medical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices;
Classification of Tissue Adhesive With Adjunct Wound Closure Device
Intended for Topical Approximation of Skin
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
tissue adhesive with adjunct wound closure device intended for topical
approximation into class II (special controls). The special control
that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled
``Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Tissue Adhesive With Adjunct Wound Closure Device
Intended for the Topical Approximation of Skin.'' The agency is
classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to
provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the
availability of a guidance document that will serve as the special
control for this device type.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 10, 2010. The
classification was effective April 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George J. Mattamal, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 66, Rm.
4617, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-
6396.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What is the background of this rulemaking?
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 301
et seq.) as amended by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the 1976
amendments) (Pub. L. 94-295), the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990
(Pub. L. 101-629), and the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act (Pub. L. 107-250) established a comprehensive system for the
regulation of medical devices intended for human use. Section 513 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 306c) established three categories (classes) of
devices, depending on the regulatory controls needed to provide
reasonable assurance of their safety and
[[Page 68973]]
effectiveness. The three categories of devices are class I (general
controls), class II (special controls), and class III (premarket
approval).
FDA refers to devices that were not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976 (the date of enactment of the 1976 amendments), as
postamendments devices. Postamendments devices are classified
automatically by statute (section 513(f) of the FD&C Act) into class
III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain in class
III and require premarket approval, unless: (1) FDA reclassifies the
device into class I or II; (2) FDA issues an order classifying the
device into class I or class II in accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act; or FDA issues an order finding the device to be
substantially equivalent, under section 513(i), to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. The agency determines whether
new devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means
of premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and 21 CFR part 807 of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act provides that any person who
submits a premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
for a device that has not previously been classified may, within 30
days after receiving an order classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, request FDA to classify the
device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA will,
within 60 days of receiving this request, classify the device by
written order. This classification shall be the initial classification
of the device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an order
classifying the device, FDA must publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an
order on February 25, 2009, classifying the PRINEO Skin Closure System
into class III, because it was not substantially equivalent to a device
that was introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce for commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or a device
which was subsequently reclassified into class I or class II. On March
23, 2009, Closure Medical Corp. submitted a petition requesting
classification of the tissue adhesive with adjunct wound closure device
for topical approximation of skin under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C
Act. The manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into
class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the petition in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition, FDA determined that tissue
adhesive with adjunct wound closure device intended for topical
approximation of skin can be classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA believes these special controls
will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of
the device.
The device is assigned the generic name ``Tissue Adhesive with
Adjunct Wound Closure Device Intended for Topical Approximation of
Skin'' and it is identified as tissue adhesive with adjunct wound
closure device intended for topical approximation of skin. FDA has
identified the following risks to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the recommended measures to mitigate these
risks.
A. Unintentional bonding of device due to misapplication of device,
device leaking or running to unintended areas, etc.
B. Wound dehiscence
C. Adverse tissue reaction and chemical burns
D. Infection
E. Applicator malfunction
F. Weak bonding leading to loss of approximation
G. Delayed polymerization
Table 1--Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended mitigation
Identified risk measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unintentional bonding of device due to Bench Testing, Labeling.
misapplication of device, device
leaking or running to unintended
areas, etc.
Wound dehiscence....................... Bench Testing, Shelf Life
Testing, Animal Testing,
Clinical Studies, Labeling.
Adverse tissue reaction and chemical Biocompatibility Animal
burns. Testing, Clinical Studies.
Infection.............................. Bench Testing, Biocompatibility
Animal Testing, Clinical
Studies, Sterility.
Applicator malfunction................. Bench Testing.
Weak bonding leading to loss of Bench Testing, Animal Testing,
approximation. Clinical Studies.
Delayed polymerization................. Bench Testing, Animal Testing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the special controls guidance document, in
addition to general controls, addresses the risks to health identified
in table 1 of this document and provides reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, on April 30, 2010,
FDA issued an order to the petitioner classifying the device into class
II. FDA is codifying this device by adding Sec. 878.4011 to 21 CFR
part 878.
Following the effective date of this final classification rule, any
firm submitting a 510(k) premarket notification for tissue adhesive
with adjunct wound closure device intended for topical approximation of
skin will need to address the issues covered in the special controls
guidance. However, the firm need only show that its device meets the
recommendations of the guidance or in some other way provides
equivalent assurance of safety and effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirement under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification
is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device and,
therefore, the type of device is not exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of device must
submit to FDA a premarket notification prior to marketing the
[[Page 68974]]
device, which contains information about the tissue adhesive with
adjunct wound closure intended for topical approximation of skin that
they intend to market.
II. What is the environmental impact of this rule?
The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. What is the analysis impact of this rule?
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because reclassification of this device from class
III to class II will relieve manufacturers of the device of cost of
complying with the premarket approval requirements of section 515 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e), and may permit small potential
competitors to enter the marketplace by lowering their costs, the
agency certifies that the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.''
The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $135
million, using the most current (2009) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this final rule to result
in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount.
IV. Does this final rule have Federalism Implications?
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the Executive order
requires agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute to preempt
State law only where the statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State
authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the
Federal statute.'' Federal law includes an express preemption provision
that preempt certain State requirements ``different from or in addition
to'' certain Federal requirements applicable to devices. 21 U.S.C.
360k; See Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996); Riegel v. Medtronic,
552 U.S. 312 (2008). The special controls established by this final
rule create ``requirements'' to address each identified risk to health
presented by these specific medical devices under 21 U.S.C. 360k, even
though product sponsors have some flexibility in how they meet those
requirements. Cf. Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107 F.3d 737, 740-42 (9th
Cir. 1997).
V. How does this rule comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
This final rule contains no new collections of information.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required. Elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, FDA is issuing a notice announcing the
availability of a guidance for the final rule. The guidance, ``Class II
Special Controls Guidance Document: Tissue Adhesive with Adjunct Wound
Closure Device Intended for the Topical Approximation of Skin,''
references previously approved collections of information found in
FDA's regulations.
VI. What references are on display?
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Petition from Closure Medical Corp., March 23, 2009.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878
Medical devices.
0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
878 is amended as follows:
PART 878--GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 878 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 3601, 371.
0
2. Section 878.4011 is added to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 878.4011 Tissue adhesive with adjunct wound closure device for
topical approximation of skin.
(a) Identification. A tissue adhesive with adjunct wound closure
device intended for the topical approximation of skin is a device
indicated for topical application only to hold closed easily
approximated skin edges of wounds from surgical incisions, including
punctures from minimally invasive surgery, and simple, thoroughly
cleansed, trauma-induced lacerations. It may be used in conjunction
with, but not in place of, deep dermal stitches. Additionally, the
adjunct wound closure device component maintains temporary skin edge
alignment along the length of wound during application of the liquid
adhesive.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is FDA's ``Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff;
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Tissue Adhesive with
Adjunct Wound Closure Device Intended for the Topical Approximation of
Skin.'' See Sec. 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance
document.
Dated: November 4, 2010.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-28356 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P