Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico; Modification of the Aflatoxin Regulations, 68681-68682 [2010-28240]
Download as PDF
68681
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 216
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0031; FV10–983–1
FIR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Modification
of the Aflatoxin Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that modified the aflatoxin
sampling and testing regulations
prescribed under the California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio
marketing order (order). The interim
rule streamlined the aflatoxin sampling
and testing procedures under the order’s
rules and regulations for pistachios to be
shipped for domestic human
consumption while maintaining
sufficient aflatoxin controls. These
changes are expected to reduce handler
operating costs by providing a uniform
and consistent aflatoxin sampling and
testing procedure for pistachios shipped
to all market destinations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 10,
2010.
SUMMARY:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Nov 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide;
or by contacting Antoinette Carter,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 983, as amended (7 CFR
part 983), regulating the handling of
pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The handling of pistachios grown in
California, Arizona, and New Mexico is
regulated by 7 CFR part 983. Prior to
this change, pistachios for shipment to
domestic markets were subject to
different aflatoxin sampling and testing
procedures than pistachios for shipment
to certain export markets. This rule
continues in effect an interim rule
modifying the aflatoxin sampling and
testing procedures to provide consistent
and uniform procedures for pistachios
regardless of market destination. These
changes are intended to streamline
handler operating procedures and
reduce operating costs.
The specific changes modify the
sampling procedure detailing how the
samples will be created and analyzed,
depending on the size of the pistachio
lots. They also specify how the lots are
certified based upon the aflatoxin levels
found in the samples. Finally, the term
‘‘Chromatograph’’ is changed to
‘‘Chromatography’’ and unnecessary
language was removed.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on July 23, 2010, and
effective on July 24, 2010, (75 FR 43045,
Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0031, FV10–983–
1 IR), § 983.150 (a), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4),
and (d)(6) were amended by removing
unnecessary language from § 983.150(a),
changing the creation and analysis of
test samples in paragraph (d)(2),
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
changing the term ‘‘Chromatograph’’ to
‘‘Chromatography’’ in paragraph (d)(3),
changing the certification of lots based
on aflatoxin levels in the samples in
paragraph (d)(5), and removing the
reference to sample #3 in paragraph
(d)(6).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 29 handlers
and 875 producers of pistachios in
California, Arizona and New Mexico.
Small business firms, which include
handlers regulated under the order,
have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000. Small
agricultural producers have been
defined as those with annual receipts of
less than $750,000.
Currently, about 72 percent of the
California handlers ship less than
$7,000,000 worth of pistachios on an
annual basis and would therefore be
considered small business firms under
the SBA definition. Based on acreage,
production, and grower prices reported
by the Committee, the average annual
revenue for small handlers is
approximately $1,721,911. The industry
has estimated that one of the Arizona
handlers and all three New Mexico
handlers would also be considered
small businesses.
Data provided by the Committee
regarding the size of the 2009 California
crop indicates that approximately 630
California growers had 350,000 pounds
or less of assessable dry weight of
pistachios. Using the most recent grower
price of $2.04 per pound for pistachios,
it is estimated that 81 percent of
California producers had receipts of
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
68682
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
approximately $714,000, which is less
than $750,000, and thus would be
considered small business according to
the SBA definition. Although there is no
official data available to date, as these
states were recently added to the order
and have not completed one full crop
year for reporting purposes, the industry
estimates that the majority of producers
in Arizona and New Mexico would also
be considered small businesses.
This rule continues in effect the
action that modified the aflatoxin
sampling and testing regulations
currently prescribed under the
California, Arizona and New Mexico
pistachio order, as well as removed
unnecessary language and corrected
terminology. The changes to § 983.150
are expected to reduce handler
operating costs by providing a uniform
and consistent aflatoxin sampling and
testing procedure for pistachios shipped
to all market destinations. Authority for
the change in the order’s rules and
regulations is provided in § 983.50.
This action is expected to benefit
producers and handlers, regardless of
size and regardless of the market they
ship into, as it streamlines handler
operations and increases marketing
flexibility. Reducing the number of
required samples, the number of
aflatoxin analyses, and the total weight
of the lot samples, while increasing the
weight of the test samples for each lot
is expected to result in an estimated
annual savings to the industry of
approximately $18,000, including
reductions of $900 for sampling, $1,400
for testing, $12,750 for labor, and $3,750
in shipping costs for those small
handlers that do not do testing on site.
This action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
pistachio handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
pistachio industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express their views
on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
September 21, 2010. No comments were
received. Therefore, for the reasons
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 Nov 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule,
without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: http:
//www.regulations.gov and type the
following docket number into the
keyword search section: FV10–983–1 IR.
Follow the link provided in the
‘‘Results’’ section of this page.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988,
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (75 FR 43045, July 23, 2010)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements and orders,
Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 983—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the interim rule that
amended 7 CFR part 983 that was
published at 75 FR 43045 on July 23,
2010, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
■
Dated: November 3, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–28240 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0700; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–123–AD; Amendment
39–16500; AD 2010–23–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702), CL–600–2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705), and CL–600–
2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The manufacturer has informed Transport
Canada that a certain number of the resolver
stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned
correctly. This condition can degrade the
AOA transducer performance at low
temperatures resulting in freezing of the AOA
transducer resolver, which may provide
inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection
System (SPS). If not corrected, this condition
can result in early or late activation of the
stick shaker and/or stick pusher.
These conditions could result in
reduced ability of the flight crew to
maintain a safe flight and landing of the
airplane. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 14, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Licata, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch,
ANE–172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7361; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43882).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The manufacturer has informed Transport
Canada that a certain number of the resolver
stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned
correctly. This condition can degrade the
AOA transducer performance at low
temperatures resulting in freezing of the AOA
transducer resolver, which may provide
inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection
System (SPS). If not corrected, this condition
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68681-68682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28240]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 68681]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0031; FV10-983-1 FIR]
Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico;
Modification of the Aflatoxin Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule that modified the aflatoxin
sampling and testing regulations prescribed under the California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio marketing order (order). The interim
rule streamlined the aflatoxin sampling and testing procedures under
the order's rules and regulations for pistachios to be shipped for
domestic human consumption while maintaining sufficient aflatoxin
controls. These changes are expected to reduce handler operating costs
by providing a uniform and consistent aflatoxin sampling and testing
procedure for pistachios shipped to all market destinations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 10, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or
by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order Administration Branch,
Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax:
(202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 983, as amended (7 CFR part 983), regulating
the handling of pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
The handling of pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico is regulated by 7 CFR part 983. Prior to this change, pistachios
for shipment to domestic markets were subject to different aflatoxin
sampling and testing procedures than pistachios for shipment to certain
export markets. This rule continues in effect an interim rule modifying
the aflatoxin sampling and testing procedures to provide consistent and
uniform procedures for pistachios regardless of market destination.
These changes are intended to streamline handler operating procedures
and reduce operating costs.
The specific changes modify the sampling procedure detailing how
the samples will be created and analyzed, depending on the size of the
pistachio lots. They also specify how the lots are certified based upon
the aflatoxin levels found in the samples. Finally, the term
``Chromatograph'' is changed to ``Chromatography'' and unnecessary
language was removed.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on July 23,
2010, and effective on July 24, 2010, (75 FR 43045, Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-
0031, FV10-983-1 IR), Sec. 983.150 (a), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and
(d)(6) were amended by removing unnecessary language from Sec.
983.150(a), changing the creation and analysis of test samples in
paragraph (d)(2), changing the term ``Chromatograph'' to
``Chromatography'' in paragraph (d)(3), changing the certification of
lots based on aflatoxin levels in the samples in paragraph (d)(5), and
removing the reference to sample 3 in paragraph (d)(6).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 29 handlers and 875 producers of pistachios
in California, Arizona and New Mexico. Small business firms, which
include handlers regulated under the order, have been defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000. Small agricultural producers
have been defined as those with annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Currently, about 72 percent of the California handlers ship less
than $7,000,000 worth of pistachios on an annual basis and would
therefore be considered small business firms under the SBA definition.
Based on acreage, production, and grower prices reported by the
Committee, the average annual revenue for small handlers is
approximately $1,721,911. The industry has estimated that one of the
Arizona handlers and all three New Mexico handlers would also be
considered small businesses.
Data provided by the Committee regarding the size of the 2009
California crop indicates that approximately 630 California growers had
350,000 pounds or less of assessable dry weight of pistachios. Using
the most recent grower price of $2.04 per pound for pistachios, it is
estimated that 81 percent of California producers had receipts of
[[Page 68682]]
approximately $714,000, which is less than $750,000, and thus would be
considered small business according to the SBA definition. Although
there is no official data available to date, as these states were
recently added to the order and have not completed one full crop year
for reporting purposes, the industry estimates that the majority of
producers in Arizona and New Mexico would also be considered small
businesses.
This rule continues in effect the action that modified the
aflatoxin sampling and testing regulations currently prescribed under
the California, Arizona and New Mexico pistachio order, as well as
removed unnecessary language and corrected terminology. The changes to
Sec. 983.150 are expected to reduce handler operating costs by
providing a uniform and consistent aflatoxin sampling and testing
procedure for pistachios shipped to all market destinations. Authority
for the change in the order's rules and regulations is provided in
Sec. 983.50.
This action is expected to benefit producers and handlers,
regardless of size and regardless of the market they ship into, as it
streamlines handler operations and increases marketing flexibility.
Reducing the number of required samples, the number of aflatoxin
analyses, and the total weight of the lot samples, while increasing the
weight of the test samples for each lot is expected to result in an
estimated annual savings to the industry of approximately $18,000,
including reductions of $900 for sampling, $1,400 for testing, $12,750
for labor, and $3,750 in shipping costs for those small handlers that
do not do testing on site.
This action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large pistachio handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this rule.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the pistachio industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the meeting was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before September 21, 2010. No comments were received. Therefore, for
the reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule
as a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: http: //www.regulations.gov and
type the following docket number into the keyword search section: FV10-
983-1 IR. Follow the link provided in the ``Results'' section of this
page.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 43045, July 23, 2010) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements and orders, Pistachios, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PART 983--[AMENDED]
0
Accordingly, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 983 that was
published at 75 FR 43045 on July 23, 2010, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: November 3, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28240 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P