Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Permit; Construction and Operation of Kaheawa II Wind Energy Generation Facility, Maui, HI; Draft Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment, 68821-68823 [2010-28197]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Notices
management actions necessary to
compensate for the impacts of
incidental take of the Covered Species
and to provide a net environmental
benefit. The goals and objectives of the
compensatory mitigation program
would be based on specific recovery
goals for each listed species. The
KSHCP compensatory program would
likely include weed, ungulate, and
predator removal designed to benefit the
Covered Species and other listed flora
and fauna. Part of the analysis in the
KSHCP will be to evaluate the potential
effects of covered activities to rare
plants, including but not limited to
Acaena exigua, Adenophorus periens,
Alsinidendron lychnoides, Cyanea
recta, Cyrtandra cyaneoides, Delissea
rivularis, Exocarpus luteolus, Myrsine
linearifolia, Nothocestrum peltatum,
Plantago princeps var. anomala,
Plantago princeps var. longibracteata,
Platanthera holochila, Poa
sandvicensis, Poa siphonoglossa, Remya
montgomeryi, Schiedea membranacea,
Solanum sandwicense, and Xylosma
crenatum. A ‘‘Plant Protection Plan’’
should be included in the KSHCP to
ensure protection of all listed plants
during seabird mitigation actions. The
KSHCP compensatory mitigation
program is also expected to support
long-term conservation partnerships
with land owners and existing efforts by
non-profit organizations that provide
long-term benefits to listed seabirds,
plants, watersheds, and other non-listed
plants and animals of Kauai.
Fees for each applicant/participant
would be proportionate to the level of
incidental take authorized as well as the
type of impact: lights or utility lines.
Fees submitted under the KSHCP would
be used to fund HCP administration,
monitoring, compensatory mitigation,
and the SOS Program.
As currently envisioned,
administration and management related
to implementation of the KSHCP would
be the responsibility of the DLNR or
their designee, with appropriate
oversight by the Service. An annual
review of actions implemented under
the KSHCP would be conducted by the
Endangered Species Recovery
Committee (ESRC). Based on that review
the ESRC may forward
recommendations for modifying
KSHCP-related actions to the Board of
Land and Natural Resources.
Environmental Impact Statement
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires
that Federal agencies conduct an
environmental analysis of their
proposed actions to determine if the
actions may significantly affect the
human environment. Under NEPA, our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
action would be the proposed issuance
of ITPs based on the KSHCP. The
Service and the DLNR are proposing to
prepare a joint Federal/State EIS to
evaluate the effects of the proposed
KSHCP and proposed issuance of
Federal and State ITPs on the human
environment. The DLNR’s preparation
of the draft KSHCP and related EIS is
based on conditions of an ESA Section
6 HCP Planning and Coordination grant
awarded to the DLNR in 2009. The joint
Federal/State EIS will be prepared in
compliance with NEPA and Hawaii
Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 343.
Although DLNR will have the lead for
preparing the EIS the Service will be
responsible for the scope and content of
the document for NEPA purposes, and
the DLNR will be responsible for the
scope and content of the document for
the purposes of satisfying requirements
of HRS Chapter 343.
The EIS will consider the proposed
action, (the issuance of Section
10(a)(1)(B) permits under the ESA), no
action (i.e., no permit issuance), a
reasonable range of other alternatives,
and the associated impacts of each
alternative. A detailed description of the
proposed action and other alternatives
(including no action) will be included
in the EIS. The range of alternatives
developed may vary by the level of
impacts caused by the proposed
activities, their specific locations, and
the conservation measures involved.
Potential alternatives may include
various methods of minimizing take
through modifications of existing power
lines, structures, and lights; placing
power line segments underground;
implementing design standards for new
facilities; variations in the scope of
covered activities; variations in the
location, amount and type of
conservation including developing and
implementing various approaches for
improving seabird survival and breeding
success; variations in permit duration;
or a combination of these elements. We
will consider other reasonable
alternatives recommended during this
scoping process in order to develop a
full range of alternatives.
The EIS will analyze direct, indirect,
and cumulative impacts on the
ecosystem and other aspects of the
human environment including, but not
limited to, biological resources, land
use, air quality, water quality, mineral
resources, water resources, recreation,
cultural and archeological resources,
visual resources, socioeconomics, and
other issues that could occur with
implementation of the proposed action
and alternatives. For all potentially
significant impacts, the EIS will identify
avoidance, minimization, and
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68821
mitigation measures to reduce those
impacts, where feasible, to a level below
significance.
Review of the EIS will be conducted
in accordance with the requirements of
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321), the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR 1500–1508), the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.),
other applicable regulations, and the
Service’s procedures for compliance
with those regulations. This notice is
being furnished in accordance with 40
CFR 1501.7 to obtain suggestions and
information from other agencies and the
public on the scope of issues and
alternatives to be addressed in the EIS.
The primary purpose of the scoping
process is to identify important issues
and alternatives related to the proposed
action.
We request comments, suggestions,
and data from all interested parties to
ensure that a reasonable range of
alternatives is presented and that all
potentially significant issues are
identified in the EIS. We will fully
consider all comments received during
the comment period. Comments and
materials we receive will become part of
the public record and will be available
for public inspection, by appointment,
during regular business hours. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: October 15, 2010.
Richard Hannan,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–28272 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–ES–2010–N219; 10120–1112–
0000–F2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Permit; Construction and
Operation of Kaheawa II Wind Energy
Generation Facility, Maui, HI; Draft
Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft
Environmental Assessment
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
68822
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Notices
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from Kaheawa Wind
Power II, LLC (KWP II) (Applicant) for
an incidental take permit (permit) under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). The Applicant is
requesting an incidental take permit
under the ESA to authorize take of three
Federally endangered and one
threatened bird species. The permit
application includes a draft Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) and a draft
Implementing Agreement (IA). We also
announce the availability of a draft
Environmental Assessment (EA) that
has been prepared in response to the
permit application in accordance with
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We
are making the permit application
package and draft EA available for
public review and comment.
DATES: All comments from interested
parties must be received on or before
December 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please address written
comments to Loyal Mehrhoff, Project
Leader, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room #3–
122, Honolulu, HI 96850. You may also
send comments by facsimile to (808)
792–9580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Kwon, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(see ADDRESSES above), telephone (808)
792–9400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Applicant is requesting an incidental
take permit under the ESA to authorize
take of the Federally endangered
Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma
sandwichensis), endangered Hawaiian
¯ ¯
goose (nene) (Branta sandvicensis),
endangered Hawaiian hoary bat
(Lasiurus cinereus semotus), and the
threatened Newell’s (Townsend’s)
shearwater (Puffinus auricularis newelli)
(collectively these four species are
hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Covered
Species’’). The permit application
includes a draft Habitat Conservation
Plan (HCP) that describes the
Applicant’s actions and the measures
the Applicant will implement to
minimize, mitigate, and monitor
incidental take of the Covered Species,
and a draft Implementing Agreement
(IA).
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
SUMMARY:
Availability of Documents
You may request copies of the permit
application, which includes the draft
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
HCP, IA, and EA, by contacting the
Service’s Pacific Islands Fish and
Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT above). These
documents are also available
electronically for review on the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands
Fish and Wildlife Office Web site at
https://www.fws.gov/pacificislands.
Comments and materials we receive, as
well as supporting documentation we
use in preparing the NEPA document,
will become part of the public record
and will be available for public
inspection by appointment, during
regular business hours. Before including
your address, phone number, e-mail
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
We specifically request comments
from the public on whether the
application meets the statutory and
regulatory requirements for issuing a
permit, and identification of any aspects
of the human environment that should
be analyzed in the draft EA. We are also
soliciting comments on the: adequacy of
the HCP to minimize, mitigate, and
monitor the proposed incidental take of
the Covered Species; adequacy of the
funding being provided to implement
the proposed mitigation program and
changed circumstances; adequacy of the
adaptive management program; and
certainty that mitigation will occur.
Please evaluate against the permit
issuance criteria found in section 10(a)
of the ESA, 16 U.S.C.1539(a), and 50
CFR 13.21, 17.22, and 17.32. In
compliance with section 10(c) of the
ESA (16 U.S.C 1539(c)), we are making
the permit application package available
for public review and comment for 30
days (see DATES section above).
Background
Section 9 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1538)
and Federal regulations prohibit the
take of fish and wildlife species listed
as endangered or threatened. The term
‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture,
or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct (Id.). However, under
section 10(a) of the ESA (16
U.S.C.1539(a)), we may issue permits to
authorize incidental take of listed fish
and wildlife species. Incidental take is
defined as take that is incidental to, and
not the purpose of, carrying out an
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
governing incidental take permits for
threatened and endangered species are
found at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22. If
issued, the permittee would receive
assurances under the Service’s ‘‘No
Surprises’’ regulations at 50 CFR
17.32(b)(5) and 50 CFR 17.22(b)(5).
KWP II is a fully owned subsidiary of
the Boston-based wind energy company,
First Wind, and would supply windgenerated electricity to the Maui Electric
Company. KWP II has developed a draft
HCP that addresses the incidental take
of the four Covered Species caused by
the construction and operation of the
KWP II wind energy facility over a
period of 20 years.
The proposed project is located
southeast of the existing 30-megawatt
(MW), 21-turbine Kaheawa Wind Power
I (KWP I) project. Like KWP II, KWP I
is owned by First Wind and is operating
under an existing HCP that addresses
incidental take of the same four covered
species. At KWP I, the Hawaiian petrel,
Hawaiian goose, and Hawaiian hoary
bat are known to have collided with
wind turbine structures.
The Hawaiian petrel and Newell’s
shearwater breed on Maui and feed in
the open ocean. Both covered seabird
species spend a large part of the year at
sea. Adults generally return to their
colonial nesting grounds in the interior
mountains of Maui beginning in March
and April, and depart beginning in
September. Fledglings (i.e., young birds
learning how to fly) travel from the
nesting colony to the sea in the fall.
Both adults and fledglings are known to
collide with tall buildings, towers,
powerlines, and other structures while
flying at night between their nesting
colonies and at-sea foraging areas. The
¯ ¯
nene is resident on site and is known to
nest in areas adjacent to the proposed
wind energy facility. The Hawaii hoary
bat has been observed on site by
acoustic monitoring; however, no
evidence of roosts has been detected.
Proposed Plan
The activities proposed to be covered
by the permit include the construction
and operation of a new 21-megawatt, 14turbine wind energy generation facility
at Kaheawa Pastures above Maalaea, in
the southwestern portion of the Island
of Maui, Hawai‘i. The proposed facility
will consist of 14 General Electric wind
turbine generators (WTGs), a
maintenance building (and renovations
to the existing Operations and
Maintenance building), an electrical
substation, a battery energy storage
system, an underground electrical
collection system carrying electrical
power from individual WTGs to the
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Notices
electrical substation, an overhead
transmission line to connect the
substation to the Maui Electric
Company Ltd. transmission line, a
permanent unguyed meteorological
monitoring tower, and short service
roads to connect the new WTGs and
other facilities to the existing main
access road servicing KWP I. The overall
project is located within a combined
footprint area of approximately 143
acres (58 hectares). The Applicant has
also applied for a State of Hawai‘i
incidental take license under Hawai‘i
State law. The draft HCP describes the
impacts of take associated with those
activities on the Covered Species, and
proposes a program to minimize and
mitigate take on each of the Covered
Species.
KWP II is proposing mitigation
measures that include: (1) Active
management such as predator removal
and construction of cat- and mongooseproof fences at Hawaiian petrel and
Newell’s shearwater colonies; (2)
¯ ¯
captive propagation and release of nene
goslings; (3) habitat management and
¯ ¯
predator control to increase nene
breeding success and survival; (4)
surveys to document the distribution
and abundance of the Hawaiian hoary
bat; and (5) habitat management and
reforestation to benefit the recovery of
the Hawaiian hoary bat. This HCP
incorporates adaptive management
provisions to allow for modifications to
the mitigation and monitoring measures
as knowledge is gained during
implementation.
We invite comments and suggestions
from all interested parties and request
that comments be as specific as
possible. In particular, we request
information and comments regarding
the following issues:
(1) The direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects that implementation
of any reasonable alternatives could
have on endangered and threatened
species;
(2) Other reasonable alternatives
consistent with the purpose of the
proposed HCP as described above, and
their associated effects;
(3) Measures that would minimize
and mitigate potentially adverse effects
of the proposed action;
(4) Adaptive management or
monitoring provisions that may be
incorporated into the alternatives, and
their benefits to listed species;
(5) Other plans or projects that might
be relevant to this action;
(6) The proposed term of the
Incidental Take Permit and whether the
proposed conservation program would
minimize and mitigate to the maximum
extent practible the incidental take that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Nov 08, 2010
Jkt 223001
would be expected to occur over 20
years; and
(7) Whether the HCP meets other ESA
sec. 10(a)(2)(B) (16 U.S.C. (a)(2)(B),
issuance criteria; and
(8) Any other information pertinent to
evaluating the effects of the proposed
action on the human environment.
The draft EA considers the direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects of the
proposed action of permit issuance,
including the measures that will be
implemented to minimize and mitigate
such impacts. The EA contains an
analysis of three alternatives: (1)
Issuance of an incidental take permit to
KWP II on the basis of the proposed
HCP with the downroad siting location;
(2) the issuance of a permit based on the
downwind/downstring siting location;
and (3) No Action (no permit issuance
and no measures by the Applicant to
reduce or eliminate the take of Covered
Species).
This notice is provided under section
10(c) (16 U.S.C. 1539(c)) of the ESA and
NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). The
public process for the proposed Federal
action will be completed after the public
comment period, at which time we will
evaluate the permit application, the
HCP and associated documents
(including the EA), and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether
or not the proposed action meets the
requirements of section 10(a) (16 U.S.C.
1539(a)) of the ESA and has been
adequately evaluated under NEPA.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
Richard Hannan,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–28197 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Amendment.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes
approval of the Amendments to the
Class III Gaming Compact (Amendment)
between the State of Oregon and the
Siletz Indians of Oregon.
DATES: Effective Date: November 9,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240;
telephone (202) 219–4066.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68823
Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This Amendment
allows for multi-player games on video
lottery terminals (VLTs).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 1, 2010.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–28267 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[Account No. 3086–SYM]
National Capital Memorial Advisory
Commission
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given that
the National Capital Memorial Advisory
Commission (the Commission) plans to
meet and discuss currently authorized
and proposed memorials in the District
of Columbia and its environs.
DATE: Wednesday, November 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: National Building Museum,
Room 312, 401 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Nancy Young, Secretary to the
Commission, by telephone at (202) 619–
7097, by e-mail at
nancy_young@nps.gov, by telefax at
(202) 619–7420, or by mail at the
National Capital Memorial Advisory
Commission, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW.,
Room 220, Washington, DC 20242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
addition to discussing general matters
and conducting routine business, the
Commission will consider one action
item: H.R. 3886, a bill to establish a
memorial to Benjamin Banneker in the
District of Columbia. There will also be
two non-action items before the
Commission:
(1) Design consultation—Dwight D.
Eisenhower Memorial, and
(2) Status report—John Adams
Memorial.
The meeting will be open to the public.
Persons who wish to file a written
statement or testify at the meeting or
who want further information
concerning the meeting may contact Ms.
Nancy Young, Secretary to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68821-68823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28197]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-ES-2010-N219; 10120-1112-0000-F2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Permit;
Construction and Operation of Kaheawa II Wind Energy Generation
Facility, Maui, HI; Draft Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft
Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
[[Page 68822]]
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from Kaheawa Wind Power II, LLC (KWP II)
(Applicant) for an incidental take permit (permit) under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). The Applicant is requesting an
incidental take permit under the ESA to authorize take of three
Federally endangered and one threatened bird species. The permit
application includes a draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and a
draft Implementing Agreement (IA). We also announce the availability of
a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) that has been prepared in
response to the permit application in accordance with requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We are making the permit
application package and draft EA available for public review and
comment.
DATES: All comments from interested parties must be received on or
before December 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please address written comments to Loyal Mehrhoff, Project
Leader, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122,
Honolulu, HI 96850. You may also send comments by facsimile to (808)
792-9580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Kwon, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES above),
telephone (808) 792-9400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Applicant is requesting an incidental
take permit under the ESA to authorize take of the Federally endangered
Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis), endangered Hawaiian goose
(n[emacr]n[emacr]) (Branta sandvicensis), endangered Hawaiian hoary bat
(Lasiurus cinereus semotus), and the threatened Newell's (Townsend's)
shearwater (Puffinus auricularis newelli) (collectively these four
species are hereafter referred to as the ``Covered Species''). The
permit application includes a draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)
that describes the Applicant's actions and the measures the Applicant
will implement to minimize, mitigate, and monitor incidental take of
the Covered Species, and a draft Implementing Agreement (IA).
Availability of Documents
You may request copies of the permit application, which includes
the draft HCP, IA, and EA, by contacting the Service's Pacific Islands
Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above).
These documents are also available electronically for review on the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office
Web site at https://www.fws.gov/pacificislands. Comments and materials
we receive, as well as supporting documentation we use in preparing the
NEPA document, will become part of the public record and will be
available for public inspection by appointment, during regular business
hours. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
We specifically request comments from the public on whether the
application meets the statutory and regulatory requirements for issuing
a permit, and identification of any aspects of the human environment
that should be analyzed in the draft EA. We are also soliciting
comments on the: adequacy of the HCP to minimize, mitigate, and monitor
the proposed incidental take of the Covered Species; adequacy of the
funding being provided to implement the proposed mitigation program and
changed circumstances; adequacy of the adaptive management program; and
certainty that mitigation will occur. Please evaluate against the
permit issuance criteria found in section 10(a) of the ESA, 16
U.S.C.1539(a), and 50 CFR 13.21, 17.22, and 17.32. In compliance with
section 10(c) of the ESA (16 U.S.C 1539(c)), we are making the permit
application package available for public review and comment for 30 days
(see DATES section above).
Background
Section 9 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1538) and Federal regulations
prohibit the take of fish and wildlife species listed as endangered or
threatened. The term ``take'' means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage
in any such conduct (Id.). However, under section 10(a) of the ESA (16
U.S.C.1539(a)), we may issue permits to authorize incidental take of
listed fish and wildlife species. Incidental take is defined as take
that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered species are found at 50 CFR 17.32
and 17.22. If issued, the permittee would receive assurances under the
Service's ``No Surprises'' regulations at 50 CFR 17.32(b)(5) and 50 CFR
17.22(b)(5).
KWP II is a fully owned subsidiary of the Boston-based wind energy
company, First Wind, and would supply wind-generated electricity to the
Maui Electric Company. KWP II has developed a draft HCP that addresses
the incidental take of the four Covered Species caused by the
construction and operation of the KWP II wind energy facility over a
period of 20 years.
The proposed project is located southeast of the existing 30-
megawatt (MW), 21-turbine Kaheawa Wind Power I (KWP I) project. Like
KWP II, KWP I is owned by First Wind and is operating under an existing
HCP that addresses incidental take of the same four covered species. At
KWP I, the Hawaiian petrel, Hawaiian goose, and Hawaiian hoary bat are
known to have collided with wind turbine structures.
The Hawaiian petrel and Newell's shearwater breed on Maui and feed
in the open ocean. Both covered seabird species spend a large part of
the year at sea. Adults generally return to their colonial nesting
grounds in the interior mountains of Maui beginning in March and April,
and depart beginning in September. Fledglings (i.e., young birds
learning how to fly) travel from the nesting colony to the sea in the
fall. Both adults and fledglings are known to collide with tall
buildings, towers, powerlines, and other structures while flying at
night between their nesting colonies and at-sea foraging areas. The
n[emacr]n[emacr] is resident on site and is known to nest in areas
adjacent to the proposed wind energy facility. The Hawaii hoary bat has
been observed on site by acoustic monitoring; however, no evidence of
roosts has been detected.
Proposed Plan
The activities proposed to be covered by the permit include the
construction and operation of a new 21-megawatt, 14-turbine wind energy
generation facility at Kaheawa Pastures above Maalaea, in the
southwestern portion of the Island of Maui, Hawai`i. The proposed
facility will consist of 14 General Electric wind turbine generators
(WTGs), a maintenance building (and renovations to the existing
Operations and Maintenance building), an electrical substation, a
battery energy storage system, an underground electrical collection
system carrying electrical power from individual WTGs to the
[[Page 68823]]
electrical substation, an overhead transmission line to connect the
substation to the Maui Electric Company Ltd. transmission line, a
permanent unguyed meteorological monitoring tower, and short service
roads to connect the new WTGs and other facilities to the existing main
access road servicing KWP I. The overall project is located within a
combined footprint area of approximately 143 acres (58 hectares). The
Applicant has also applied for a State of Hawai`i incidental take
license under Hawai`i State law. The draft HCP describes the impacts of
take associated with those activities on the Covered Species, and
proposes a program to minimize and mitigate take on each of the Covered
Species.
KWP II is proposing mitigation measures that include: (1) Active
management such as predator removal and construction of cat- and
mongoose-proof fences at Hawaiian petrel and Newell's shearwater
colonies; (2) captive propagation and release of n[emacr]n[emacr]
goslings; (3) habitat management and predator control to increase
n[emacr]n[emacr] breeding success and survival; (4) surveys to document
the distribution and abundance of the Hawaiian hoary bat; and (5)
habitat management and reforestation to benefit the recovery of the
Hawaiian hoary bat. This HCP incorporates adaptive management
provisions to allow for modifications to the mitigation and monitoring
measures as knowledge is gained during implementation.
We invite comments and suggestions from all interested parties and
request that comments be as specific as possible. In particular, we
request information and comments regarding the following issues:
(1) The direct, indirect, and cumulative effects that
implementation of any reasonable alternatives could have on endangered
and threatened species;
(2) Other reasonable alternatives consistent with the purpose of
the proposed HCP as described above, and their associated effects;
(3) Measures that would minimize and mitigate potentially adverse
effects of the proposed action;
(4) Adaptive management or monitoring provisions that may be
incorporated into the alternatives, and their benefits to listed
species;
(5) Other plans or projects that might be relevant to this action;
(6) The proposed term of the Incidental Take Permit and whether the
proposed conservation program would minimize and mitigate to the
maximum extent practible the incidental take that would be expected to
occur over 20 years; and
(7) Whether the HCP meets other ESA sec. 10(a)(2)(B) (16 U.S.C.
(a)(2)(B), issuance criteria; and
(8) Any other information pertinent to evaluating the effects of
the proposed action on the human environment.
The draft EA considers the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects
of the proposed action of permit issuance, including the measures that
will be implemented to minimize and mitigate such impacts. The EA
contains an analysis of three alternatives: (1) Issuance of an
incidental take permit to KWP II on the basis of the proposed HCP with
the downroad siting location; (2) the issuance of a permit based on the
downwind/downstring siting location; and (3) No Action (no permit
issuance and no measures by the Applicant to reduce or eliminate the
take of Covered Species).
This notice is provided under section 10(c) (16 U.S.C. 1539(c)) of
the ESA and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). The public process for
the proposed Federal action will be completed after the public comment
period, at which time we will evaluate the permit application, the HCP
and associated documents (including the EA), and comments submitted
thereon to determine whether or not the proposed action meets the
requirements of section 10(a) (16 U.S.C. 1539(a)) of the ESA and has
been adequately evaluated under NEPA.
Dated: October 20, 2010.
Richard Hannan,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-28197 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P