Proposed Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, and Information Order, 68512-68529 [2010-28038]

Agencies

• Agricultural Marketing Service
• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68512-68529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1214

[Document No. AMS-FV-10-0008-PR-1A]
RIN 0581-AD00


Proposed Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, and Information 
Order

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on the establishment of an 
industry-funded promotion, research, and information program for fresh 
cut Christmas trees. The proposed Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, 
and Information Order (Proposed Order), was submitted to the Department 
of Agriculture (Department) by the Christmas Tree Checkoff Task Force, 
an industry wide group of producers and importers that support this 
proposed program. Under the Proposed Order, producers and importers of 
fresh cut Christmas trees would pay an initial assessment of $0.15 per 
tree, which would be paid to the proposed Christmas Tree Promotion 
Board (Board). This Board would be responsible for administration and 
operation of the proposed Order. Producers and importers that 
domestically produce or import less than 500 Christmas trees annually 
would be exempt from the assessment. The proposed program is authorized 
under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 
(1996 Act). A referendum will be conducted, among producers and 
importers, three years after the

[[Page 68513]]

collection of assessments begin to determine if Christmas tree 
producers and importers favor the continuation of this program. This 
proposed rule also announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) 
intention to request approval of new Christmas tree information 
collection requirements by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for the operation of the Proposed Order.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 7, 2011. Pursuant to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), comments on the information collection 
burden that would result from this proposal must be received by 
February 7, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or to the Research and 
Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0244, Room 0632-S, Washington, DC 20250-
0244; fax: (202) 205-2800. All comments should reference the docket 
number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the above 
office during regular business hours or can be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this 
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available 
to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals 
or entities submitting comments will be made public on the Internet at 
the address provided above.
    Pursuant to PRA, comments regarding the accuracy of the burden 
estimate, ways to minimize the burden, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, or any 
other aspect of this collection of information, should be sent to the 
above address. In addition, comments concerning the information 
collection should also be sent to the Desk Office for Agriculture, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 725, 
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia A. Petrella, Marketing 
Specialist, Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 0632, Stop 
0244, Washington, DC 20250-0244; telephone: (301) 334-2891; or 
facsimile: (301) 334-2896; or e-mail: Patricia.Petrella@ams.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued pursuant to the 
Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) 
(7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).

Executive Order 12866

    This proposed rule has been determined not significant for purposes 
of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
Section 524 of the 1996 Act provides that it shall not affect or 
preempt any other Federal or state law authorizing promotion or 
research relating to an agricultural commodity.
    Under section 519 of the 1996 Act, a person subject to an order may 
file a written petition with the Department stating that an order, any 
provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an 
order, is not established in accordance with the law, and requesting a 
modification of an order or an exemption from an order. Any petition 
filed challenging an order, any provision of an order, or any 
obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be filed within 
two years after the effective date of an order, provision, or 
obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will 
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, the 
Department will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides 
that the district court of the United States for any district in which 
the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction 
to review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a 
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the 
entry of the Department's final ruling.

Executive Order 13132

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism. This Executive Order directs agencies to construe, in 
regulations and otherwise, a Federal Statute to preempt State law only 
when the statute contains an express preemption provision. Section 524 
of the 1996 Act provides that the Act shall not affect or preempt any 
other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating 
to an agricultural commodity.
    The proponent, the Christmas Tree Checkoff Task Force is an 
industry wide group of producers and importers that support this 
proposed program. They have conducted meetings throughout the United 
States with several State and multi-State Christmas tree organizations. 
The proposed program is not intended to duplicate any State program. 
The proponents have determined that they need a mechanism that would be 
sustainable over time. A national Christmas tree research and promotion 
program would accomplish this goal.

Summary

    This proposed rule invites comments on the establishment of an 
industry-funded promotion, research, and information program for fresh 
cut Christmas trees. The proposed Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, 
and Information Order (Proposed Order), was submitted to the Department 
of Agriculture (Department) by the Christmas Tree Checkoff Task Force 
(Task Force), an industry wide group of producers and importers that 
support this proposed program. Under the Proposed Order, producers and 
importers of fresh cut Christmas trees would pay an initial assessment 
of $0.15 cents per tree, which would be paid to the Christmas Tree 
Promotion Board (Board). This Board would be responsible for 
administration and operation of the Proposed Order. Producers and 
importers that domestically produce or import less than 500 Christmas 
trees annually would be exempt from the assessment. The proposed 
program is authorized under the 1996 Act.
    A referendum will be conducted, among producers and importers, 
three years after the collection of assessments begin to determine if 
Christmas tree producers and importers favor the continuation of this 
program. This proposed rule also announces the Agricultural Marketing 
Service's (AMS) intention to request approval of new Christmas tree 
information collection requirements by the OMB for the operation of 
Proposed Order.

Authority in 1996 Act

    The proposed Order is authorized under the 1996 Act which 
authorizes USDA to establish agricultural commodity research and 
promotion orders which may include a combination of promotion, 
research, industry information, and consumer information activities 
funded by mandatory assessments. These programs are designed to 
maintain and expand markets and uses for agricultural commodities. As 
defined under section 513(1)(D) of the 1996 Act, agricultural 
commodities include the products of

[[Page 68514]]

forestry. The proposed Order would provide for the development and 
financing of a coordinated program of research, promotion, and 
information for Christmas trees.
    The 1996 Act provides for a number of optional provisions that 
allow the tailoring of orders for different commodities. Section 516 of 
the 1996 Act provides permissive terms for orders, and other sections 
provide for alternatives. For example, section 514 of the 1996 Act 
provides for orders applicable to (1) Producers, (2) first handlers and 
others in the marketing chain as appropriate, and (3) importers (if 
imports are subject to assessments). Section 516 states that an order 
may include an exemption of de minimis quantities of an agricultural 
commodity; different payment and reporting schedules; coverage of 
research, promotion, and information activities to expand, improve, or 
make more efficient the marketing or use of an agricultural commodity 
in both domestic and foreign markets; provision for reserve funds; 
provision for credits for generic and branded activities; and 
assessment of imports.
    In addition, section 518 of the 1996 Act provides for referenda to 
ascertain approval of an order to be conducted either prior to its 
going into effect or within three years after assessments first begin 
under the order. An order also may provide for its approval in a 
referendum based upon different voting patterns. Section 515 provides 
for establishment of a board or council from among producers, first 
handlers and others in the marketing chain as appropriate, and 
importers, if imports are subject to assessment.

Industry Background

    Christmas trees have been commercially sold in the United States 
since about 1850, when most were cut from wild stands. In the last 55 
to 60 years, Christmas trees have been farmed and harvested as an 
agricultural row crop. Most Christmas trees are now grown on or 
selected and cut by consumers on tree farms. The U.S. Christmas tree 
industry consists of over 12,000 farms producing over 17 million 
Christmas trees per year. The best selling Christmas trees are Scotch 
pine, Douglas fir, noble fir, Fraser fir, Virginia pine, balsam fir and 
white pine.
    Christmas trees are grown for retail sale in almost all U.S. 
states. Oregon, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Pennsylvania 
together produce more than 75 percent of the trees produced each year. 
During 2007, 47 out of the 50 States contributed to the production of 
Christmas trees.

Competition

    The fresh cut Christmas tree industry competes directly with the 
artificial Christmas tree industry. Artificial Christmas tree companies 
advertise heavily throughout the fall and Christmas seasons. According 
to data supplied by the proponents artificial tree purchases have 
increased from 9.8 million in 2003 to 17.4 million in 2007.

Imports

    According to U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 
Foreign Trade Statistics, imports of Christmas trees from 2006 through 
2008 averaged about 1.9 million trees. During those years, imports from 
Canada accounted for 99.72 percent of the total imports. Italy, 
Colombia and Mali comprised about .28 million trees or less than one 
percent. For the same period, these imports were valued at 27.427 
million dollars.

Prices

    According to the Task Force, in 2007 the average price per tree for 
a Noble was approximately $18.00 and the average price per tree for a 
Douglas was $11.00. By averaging these two types of Christmas trees, 
prices would be approximately $15 per tree. With 31 million trees cut 
in 2007, the value would be approximately $465 million (value at point 
of first sale).

Need for a Program

    A national research and promotion program for Christmas trees would 
help the industry to address the many market problems it currently 
faces. According to the Task Force, two main factors currently 
affecting Christmas tree sales, both in the domestic market and abroad, 
are increased competition and changing consumer habits.
    According to additional data supplied by the Task Force, the market 
share of fresh Christmas trees in the U.S. from 1965 to 2008 has 
declined by 6 percent. In comparison, the market share of artificial 
trees has increased 655 percent from 1965 to 2008.
    According to the proponent data, sales of fresh cut Christmas trees 
decreased by 15 million trees from 37 million trees sold in 1991 down 
to 22 million trees sold in 2002. The industry saw an increase in sales 
in 2003 through 2007 when the industry conducted a voluntary marketing 
campaign which was lead by a small group of producers and retailers. 
This voluntary marketing campaign saw sales rebound by 9 million 
trees--from 22 million trees sold in 2002 to 31 million trees sold in 
2007. Even with the strong sales response to the marketing efforts, the 
voluntary marketing program suffers from a lack of funding.
    The Christmas tree industry has tried three different times to 
conduct promotional programs based on voluntary contributions. Each 
time, after about three years, the revenue declined to a point where 
the programs were ineffective. The decline in revenue is attributable 
to the voluntary nature of these programs. Therefore, the proponents 
have determined that they need a mechanism that would be sustainable 
over time. They believe that a national Christmas tree research and 
promotion program would accomplish this goal.

Specific Provisions

Definitions

    Pursuant to section 513 of the 1996 Act, sections 1214.1 through 
1214.30 of the proposed Order define certain terms that would be used 
throughout the Order. Several of the terms are common to all research 
and promotion programs authorized under the 1996 Act while other terms 
are specific to the proposed Christmas tree Order.
    Section 1214.1 would define the term ``Act'' to mean the Commodity 
Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425), 
and any amendments thereto.
    Section 1214.2 would define the term ``Christmas Tree Promotion 
Board'' to mean the administrative body established pursuant to Sec.  
1214.40.
    Section 1214.3 would define the term ``Christmas tree'' to mean any 
tree of the coniferous species that is severed or cut from its roots 
and marketed as a Christmas tree. The coniferous species include the 
botanical group of trees that have needle-like or scale-like leaves.
    Section 1214.5 would define the term ``crop year'' to mean August 1 
through July 31.
    Section 1214.6 would define the term ``Customs'' to mean the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Customs Service, an agency of the 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
    Section 1214.8 would define the term ``fiscal period'' or ``fiscal 
year'' to mean the period August 1 through July 31.
    Section 1214.9 would define the term ``importer'' to mean any 
person importing Christmas trees into the United States in a fiscal 
period as a principal or agent, broker, or consignee of any person who 
domestically produces Christmas trees outside of the United States for 
sale in the United States, and who is listed in the import records as 
the importer of record for such Christmas trees.
    Section 1214.10 would define the term ``information'' to mean 
activities or

[[Page 68515]]

programs designed to disseminate the results of research, new and 
existing marketing programs, new and existing marketing strategies, new 
and existing uses and applications, and to enhance the image of 
Christmas trees.
    Section 1214.11 would define the term ``marketing'' to mean the 
sale or other disposition of Christmas trees in interstate, foreign, or 
intrastate commerce.
    Section 1214.13 would define the terms ``part'' and ``subpart.'' 
The term ``part'' would mean the Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, 
and Information Order and all rules, regulations, and supplemental 
orders issued pursuant to the Act and the Order. The Order would be a 
``subpart'' of the part.
    Section 1214.15 would define the terms programs, plans, and 
projects to mean research, promotion and information programs, plans, 
or projects established under the Order.
    Section 1214.16 would define ``produce'' to mean to engage in the 
cutting and selling of Christmas trees for the holiday market.
    Section 1214.17 would define ``producer'' to mean any person who is 
engaged in the production of Christmas trees in the United States, and 
who owns, or shares the ownership and risk of loss of production of 
Christmas trees or a person who is engaged in the business of 
producing, or causing to be domestically produced, Christmas trees 
beyond personal use and having value at first point of sale.
    Section 1214.18 would define the term ``promotion'' to mean any 
action taken, including paid advertising, public relations and other 
communications, and promoting the results of research, that presents a 
favorable image of Christmas trees to the public and to any and all 
consumers and those who influence consumption of Christmas trees with 
the intent of improving the perception, markets and competitive 
position of Christmas trees and stimulating sales of Christmas trees.
    Section 1214.19 would define the term ``research'' to mean any 
activity that advances the position of Christmas trees in the market 
place that includes, but is not limited to any type of test, study, or 
analysis designed to advance the image, desirability, use, 
marketability, sales, product development, or quality of Christmas 
trees; and the effectiveness of market development and promotion 
efforts including competitiveness, efficiency, pest and disease 
control, and other aspects of Christmas tree production.
    Sections 1214.4, 1214.7, 1214.12, 1214.14, 1214.20, 1214.21, 
1214.22, 1214.23, and 1214.24 would define the terms ``conflict of 
interest,'' ``Department or UDSA,'' ``Order,'' ``person,'' 
``Secretary,'' ``State,'' ``suspend,'' ``terminate,'' and ``United 
States,'' respectively. The definitions are the same as those specified 
in section 513 of the Act.

Establishment of the Board

    Pursuant to section 515 of the 1996 Act, Sec. Sec.  1214.40 through 
1214.47 of the proposed Order would detail the establishment and 
membership of the proposed Christmas Tree Promotion Board, nominations 
and appointments, the term of office, removal and vacancies, procedure, 
reimbursement and attendance, powers and duties, and prohibited 
activities.
    Section 1214.40 would specify the Board establishment and 
membership. The Board would be composed of 12 members. Eleven members 
would be domestic producers and would be allocated to three regions in 
the United States based on the volume of Christmas trees domestically 
produced from each respective region. The total number of Board members 
could not be increased. The 11 members would be allocated as follows: 
Region number 1 (Western Region), 5 members; region number 2 (Central 
Region), 2 members; and region number 3 (Eastern Region), 4 members. 
Specific States and territories within each domestic region would be 
specified in Sec.  1214.40(a)(1) of the proposed Order. One member 
would be an importer who imports Christmas trees into the United 
States.
    The Task Force recommended that the Board have no alternate Board 
members. It wants to ensure that industry members who seek 
representation and serve on the Board are committed to their service 
and participate in all Board meetings.
    Every 5 years, but no more often than once every 3 years, the Board 
must review, based on a 3-year average, the geographical distribution 
of the production of Christmas trees within the United States and the 
number of Christmas trees imported into the United States. If 
warranted, the Board would recommend to the Secretary that the Board 
membership be reapportioned appropriately to reflect such changes. Any 
changes in Board composition would be implemented by the Secretary 
through rulemaking.
    Section 1214.41 of the proposed Order would specify Board 
nominations and appointments. The initial nominations would be 
conducted by the Department. The Department would publicize the 
nomination process, using trade press or other means it deems 
appropriate, and outreach to all sizes of Christmas tree producers for 
the U.S. market. The Department could use regional caucuses, mail or 
other methods to elicit potential nominees. The Secretary would select 
the members of the Board from the nominations.
    Regarding subsequent nominations, the Board staff would solicit 
nominations as described in the preceding paragraph. Nominees would 
have the opportunity to provide the Board a short background statement 
outlining their qualifications and desire to serve on the Board. 
Nominees for the initial and subsequent Boards must domestically 
produce 500 or more Christmas trees during the crop year to be eligible 
to serve on the Board.
    Producers who domestically produce Christmas trees in more than one 
region could seek nomination in the region where the majority of their 
trees are produced. The names of producers would be placed on a ballot 
by region. The ballots along with the background statements would be 
mailed to producers in each respective region for a vote. Producers who 
produce in more than one region could only vote in the region in which 
they produce a majority of their Christmas trees. The nominee receiving 
the highest number of votes and the nominee receiving the second 
highest number of votes shall be submitted to the Department as the 
producers' first and second choice nominees.
    Importer nominees would be solicited by the Board from those 
importers who have paid their assessments to the Board in the most 
recent fiscal period. They also must have imported more than 500 
Christmas trees during the fiscal period. The names of importer 
nominees would then be placed on a ballot. The ballots along with the 
background statements would be mailed to importers for a vote. The 
nominee receiving the highest number of votes and the nominee receiving 
the second highest number of votes shall be submitted to the Department 
as the producers' first and second choice nominees. If there is an 
insufficient number of nominees from whom to appoint members to the 
Board, the Secretary may appoint members in such a manner as the 
Secretary determines appropriate.
    The Board would submit nominations to the Secretary 90 days before 
the new Board term begins. The Secretary would select the members of 
the Board from the nominations submitted by the Board (through the 
balloting process). In order to provide the Board flexibility, the 
Board could recommend to the Secretary modifications to its nomination 
procedures. Any such modifications would be implemented

[[Page 68516]]

through rulemaking by the Secretary. Section 1214.42 of the proposed 
Order would specify the term of office. With the exception of the 
initial Board, each Board member would serve a three-year term or until 
the Secretary selected his or her successor. Each term of office would 
begin on January 1 and end on December 31. No member could serve more 
than two consecutive terms, excluding any term of office less than 
three years. For the initial board, the terms of Board members would be 
staggered for two, three, and four years.
    Section 1214.43 of the proposed Order would specify criteria for 
the removal of members and for filling vacancies. If a Board member 
ceased to work for a producer or importer or ceased to do business in 
the region he or she represented, such position would become vacant. 
Additionally, the Board could recommend to the Secretary that a member 
be removed from office if the member consistently refused to perform 
his or her duties or engaged in dishonest acts or willful misconduct. 
The Secretary could remove the member if he or she finds that the 
Board's recommendation shows adequate cause. Further, without 
recommendation of the Board, a member may be removed by the Secretary 
upon showing of adequate cause, including the failure by a member to 
submit reports or remit assessments required under this part, if the 
Secretary determines that such member's continued service would be 
detrimental to the achievement of the purposes of the Act.
    If a position became vacant, nominations to fill the vacancy would 
be conducted using the nominations process as proposed in Sec.  1214.41 
of the Order. A vacancy would not be required to be filled if the 
unexpired term is less than six months.
    Section 1214.44 of the proposed Order would specify procedures of 
the Board. A majority of the Board members (7) would constitute a 
quorum. If participation by telephone or other means were permitted, 
members participating by such means would count towards the quorum 
requirements or other voting requirements as authorized under the 
Order. Proxy voting would not be permitted. A motion would carry if 
supported by a majority of Board members present.
    The proposed Order would also provide for the Board to take action 
by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other electronic 
means when the chairperson believes it is necessary. Actions taken 
under these procedures would be valid only if all members and the 
Secretary were notified of the meeting and all members were provided 
the opportunity to vote and a majority of the members present voted in 
favor of the action. Additionally, all votes would have to be confirmed 
in writing and recorded in Board minutes.
    Section 1214.45 of the proposed Order would specify that Board 
members or committee members would serve without compensation. However, 
Board members or committee members would be reimbursed for reasonable 
travel expenses, as approved by the Board, incurred when performing 
Board business.
    Section 1214.46 of the proposed Order would specify powers and 
duties of the Board. These are similar to promotion programs authorized 
under the 1996 Act. They include, among other things, to administer the 
Order and collect assessments; to develop bylaws and recommend 
regulations necessary to administer the Order; to select a chairperson 
and other Board officers; to create an executive committee and form 
other committees and subcommittees as necessary; to hire staff or 
contractors; to provide appropriate notice of meetings to the industry 
and USDA and keep minutes of such meetings; to develop programs and 
enter into contracts to implement programs; to submit a budget to USDA 
for approval within 60 calendars days after assessments are due; to 
borrow funds necessary to cover startup costs of the Order; to invest 
Board funds appropriately; to recommend changes in the assessment rate 
as appropriate and within the limits of the Order; to have its books 
audited by an outside certified public accountant at the end of each 
fiscal period and at other times as requested by the Secretary; to 
report its activities to manufacturers for the U.S. market; to make 
public an accounting of funds received and expended; to receive, 
investigate and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of the 
Order; and to recommend amendments to the Order as appropriate.
    Section 1214.47 of the proposed Order would specify prohibited 
activities that appear in other promotion programs authorized under the 
1996 Act. In summary, neither the Board nor its employees and agents 
could engage in actions that would be a conflict of interest; use Board 
funds to lobby (influencing legislation or governmental action or 
policy, by local, state, national, and foreign governments or 
subdivisions thereof, other than recommending to the Secretary 
amendments to the Order); or engage in any advertising or activities 
that may be false, misleading or disparaging to another agricultural 
commodity.

Expenses and Assessments

    Pursuant to sections 516 and 517 of the 1996 Act, Sec. Sec.  
1214.50 through 1214.56 of the proposed Order detail requirements 
regarding the Board's budget and expenses, financial statements, 
assessments, and exemption from assessments. Within 60 days after 
assessments are due to the Board, and as necessary during the year, the 
Board would submit a budget to USDA covering its projected expenses. 
The budget must include a summary of anticipated revenue and expenses 
for each program along with a breakdown of staff and administrative 
expenses. Except for the initial budget, the Board's budgets should 
include comparative data for at least one preceding fiscal period.
    Assessments are due to the Board on February 15th of each crop 
year. Providing the Board sixty days after assessments are due to 
develop and submit a budget allow enough time for the budget to be 
approved prior to the beginning of the fiscal period (August 1). Also, 
this allows the Board to have knowledge of the monies available to 
develop promotion, research, or information programs for the upcoming 
fiscal period.
    Each budget must provide for adequate funds to cover the Board's 
anticipated expenses. Any amendment or addition to an approved budget 
must be approved by USDA, including shifting of funds from one program, 
plan or project to another. Shifts of funds that do not result an 
increase in the Board's approved budget would not have to have prior 
approval from USDA. For example, if the Board's approved budget 
provided for $1 million in consumer advertising and $500,000 in 
research projects, a shift of $50,000 from consumer advertising to 
research would require USDA approval. However, a shift within the $1 
million consumer advertising line item would not require prior USDA 
approval.
    The Board would be authorized to incur reasonable expenses for its 
maintenance and functioning. During its first year of operation, the 
Board could borrow funds for startup costs and capital outlay. Any 
borrowed funds would be subject to the same fiscal, budget and audit 
controls as other funds of the Board.
    The Board could also accept voluntary contributions and seek other 
funding sources to carry out activities authorized under the Order. Any 
contributions received by the Board would be free from encumbrances by 
the donor and the Board would retain control over use of the funds. 
However,

[[Page 68517]]

the Board could receive funds from outside sources targeted for 
specific authorized projects. For example, the Board could receive 
Federal grant funds, subject to approval by the Secretary, for a 
specific research project. The Board would also be required to 
reimburse USDA for costs incurred by USDA in overseeing the Order's 
operations, including all costs associated with referenda.
    The Board would be limited to spending no more than 10 percent of 
its available funds for administration, maintenance, and the 
functioning of the Board. Reimbursements to USDA would not be 
considered administrative costs. As an example, if the Board received 
$2 million in assessments during a fiscal period, and had available 
$500,000 in reserve funds, the Board's available funds would be 
$2,500,000. In this scenario, the Board would be limited to spending no 
more than $250,000 (.10 x $2.5 million) on administrative costs. While 
section 515 of the 1996 Act limits such spending to 15 percent of a 
board's budget, the Task Force believes that 10 percent is appropriate.
    The Board could also maintain a monetary reserve and carry over 
excess funds from one fiscal period to the next. However, such reserve 
funds could not exceed one fiscal period's budgeted expenses. For 
example, if the Board's budgeted expenses for a fiscal period were $2 
million, it could carry over no more than $2 million in reserve. With 
approval of the Secretary, reserve funds could be used to pay expenses.
    The Board could invest its revenue collected under the Order in the 
following: (1) Obligations of the United States or any agency of the 
United States; (2) general obligations of any State or any political 
subdivision of a State; (3) interest bearing accounts or certificates 
of deposit of financial institutions that are members of the Federal 
Reserve; and (4) obligations fully guaranteed as to principal interest 
by the United States.
    The Board would be required to submit to USDA financial statements 
on a quarterly basis, or at any other time as requested by the 
Secretary. Financial statements should include, at a minimum, a balance 
sheet, an income statement, and an expense budget.

Assessments

    The Board's programs and expenses would be funded through 
assessments on producers, importers, donations, other income, and other 
funds available to the Board. The Order would provide for an initial 
assessment rate of $0.15 per Christmas tree domestically produced or 
imported into the United States.
    This assessment rate will be reviewed by the Board after the 
initial referendum is conducted (3 years after assessments first 
begin). The assessment rate cannot be changed during the first three 
years of operation of the Order. The assessment rate may be increased 
or decreased no more than 2 cents per Christmas tree during the fiscal 
period. Any change in the assessment rate within this range would be 
subject to rulemaking by the Secretary. The assessment rate shall not 
exceed 20 cents per Christmas tree, nor shall it be less than 10 cents 
per Christmas tree, unless a majority of producers and importers 
approve such other levels of assessments through a referendum conducted 
pursuant to this subpart.
    The number of entities assessed under the program would be 
approximately 3,263. Estimated revenue is expected at $2 million of 
which 10 percent is expected from imported product and 90 percent from 
domestic product.
    Producers would be required to pay their assessments owed to the 
Board by February 15th of each fiscal period. Importer assessments 
would be collected through Customs. The Order would specify a list of 
numbers of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that 
would identify Christmas trees subject to assessments. If Customs did 
not collect the assessment from an importer, then the importer would be 
responsible for paying the assessment directly to the Board within 30 
calendar days after importation.
    The Order would provide authority for the Board to impose a late 
payment charge and interest for assessments overdue to the Board. The 
late payment charge and rate of interest would be prescribed in the 
Order's regulations issued by the Secretary.

Exemptions

    The Order would provide for two exemptions. First, producers who 
produce domestically less than 500 Christmas trees or importers that 
import less than 500 Christmas trees during a fiscal period would be 
exempt from paying assessments. Producers or importers would apply to 
the Board for an exemption prior to the start of the fiscal period. 
This would be an annual exemption; entities would have to reapply each 
year. They would have to certify that they expect to produce 
domestically or import less than 500 Christmas trees for the applicable 
fiscal period. The Board could request past sales or import data to 
support the exemption request. The Board would then issue, if deemed 
appropriate, a certificate of exemption to the eligible producer or 
importer. Once approved, producers would not have to pay assessments to 
the Board for the applicable fiscal period. Approved importers would 
have their assessments as collected by Customs refunded by the Board 
within 60 calendar days after receipt of such assessments by the Board. 
No interest would be paid on the assessments collected by Customs.
    Producers who did not apply to the Board for an exemption and 
domestically produced or imported less than 500 Christmas trees during 
the fiscal period would receive a refund from the Board for the 
applicable assessments within 30 calendar days after the end of the 
fiscal period. Producers who receive an exemption certificate but 
domestically produce or import more than 500 Christmas trees during the 
fiscal period would have to pay the Board the applicable assessments 
owed within 30 calendar days after the end of the fiscal period and 
submit any necessary reports to the Board.
    The Board could develop additional procedures to administer the 
exemption as appropriate. Such procedures would be implemented through 
rulemaking by the Secretary.
    The second exemption under the proposed Order would be for organic 
Christmas trees. A producer who operates under an approved National 
Organic Program (NOP) (7 CFR part 205) system plan, only domestically 
produces Christmas trees that are eligible to be labeled as 100 percent 
organic under the NOP, and is not a split operation would be exempt 
from payment of assessments. Likewise, an importer who imports only 
Christmas trees that is eligible to be labeled as 100 percent organic 
under the NOP and who does not import any nonorganic Christmas trees 
would be exempt from the payment of assessments.

Refunds

    Pursuant to section 518 of the 1996 Act, section 1214.54 of the 
proposed Order would specify the refund procedures if the initial 
referendum does not pass. The Task Force has proposed that the proposed 
Order be voted in a referendum of producers and importers three years 
after assessments first begin under the Order. The Board shall 
establish an interest bearing escrow account with a financial 
institution that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and will 
deposit into such account an amount equal to 10 percent of the 
assessments collected during the period beginning on the

[[Page 68518]]

effective date of the Order and ending on the date the Secretary 
announces the results of the required referendum.
    If the required referendum fails, the Board shall promptly pay 
refunds of assessments to all producers and importers that have paid 
assessments during the period beginning on the effective date of the 
Order and ending on the date the Secretary announces the results of the 
required referendum in the manner specified in the proposed Order. 
Producers and importers shall notify the Board, in a manner specified 
by the Secretary, within 30 days after the announcement of the 
referendum of their demand to receive a refund.
    If the amount deposited in the escrow account is less than the 
amount of all refunds that producers and importers subject to the Order 
have a right to receive, the Board shall prorate the amount deposited 
in such account among all producers and importers who desire a refund 
of assessments paid no later than 90 days after the required referendum 
results are announced by the Secretary.
    If the proposed Order is approved by the required referendum 
conducted under this section, the Board will close the escrow account 
and all funds will be available to the Board under section 1214.50.

Promotion, Research and Information

    Pursuant to section 516 of the 1996 Act, Sec. Sec.  1214.60 through 
1214.62 of the proposed Order would detail requirements regarding 
promotion, research and information projects authorized under the 
Order. The Board would develop and submit to the Secretary for approval 
plans and programs regarding promotion, research, education, and other 
activities, including consumer and industry information and advertising 
designed to, among other things, build markets for Christmas trees, and 
enhance the image and reputation of Christmas trees. The Board would be 
required to evaluate each plan and program to ensure that it 
contributes to an effective promotion program. Christmas trees of all 
origins would have to be treated equally by the Board, and no program, 
plan, or project could be false, misleading, or disparage against 
another agricultural commodity.
    The Order would also require that, at least once every five years, 
the Board fund an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of the 
Order and programs conducted by the Board. Finally, the Order would 
specify that any patents, copyrights, trademarks, inventions, product 
formulations and publications developed through the use of funds 
received by the Board would be the property of the U.S. Government, as 
represented by the Board. These along with any rents, royalties and the 
like from their use would be considered income subject to the same 
fiscal, budget, and audit controls as other funds of the Board, and 
could be licensed with approval of the Secretary.

Reports, Books and Records

    Pursuant to section 515 of the 1996 Act, Sec. Sec.  1214.70 through 
1214.72 specify the reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the 
proposed Order as well as requirements regarding confidentiality of 
information.
    Producers and importers would be required to submit periodically to 
the Board certain information as the Board may request. Specifically, 
producers and importers would submit a report to the Board that would 
include, but not be limited to, the producers' or importers' name and 
address; the number of trees produced or imported; the number of 
Christmas trees on which the assessment was paid; and the date the 
assessment was paid. Producers and importers would submit this report 
at the same time they remit their assessments to the Board. Producers 
or importers who received a certificate of exemption from the Board 
would not have to submit such a report to the Board. Importers who paid 
their assessments through Customs would not have to submit such reports 
to the Board because Customs would collect this information upon entry. 
However, exempt producers or importers who domestically produced or 
imported over the exemption threshold of 500 Christmas trees during the 
fiscal period would have to submit such reports to the Board with the 
payment of assessments as specified in Sec.  1214.53.
    The Board would have the flexibility to request additional 
information from producers and importers as deemed appropriate to 
administer the Order. Additionally, producers and importers, including 
those who were exempt, would be required to maintain books and records 
needed to verify any required reports. Such books and records must be 
made available during normal business hours for inspection by the 
Board's or USDA's employees or agents. Producers and importers would be 
required to maintain such books and records for two years beyond the 
applicable fiscal period.
    The Order would also require that all information obtained from 
persons subject the Order as a result of proposed recordkeeping and 
reporting requirements would be kept confidential by all officers, 
employees, and agents of the Board and USDA. Such information could 
only be disclosed if the Secretary considered it relevant, and the 
information were revealed in a judicial proceeding or administrative 
hearing brought at the direction or at the request of the Secretary or 
to which the Secretary or any officer of USDA were a party. Other 
exceptions for disclosure of confidential information would include the 
issuance of general statements based on reports or on information 
relating to a number of persons subject to the Order, if the statements 
did not identify the information furnished by any person, or the 
publication, by direction of the Secretary, of the name of any person 
violating the Order and a statement of the particular provisions of the 
Order violated.

Miscellaneous Provisions

Referenda

    Pursuant to section 518 of the 1996 Act, Sec.  1214.81(a)(1) of the 
proposed Order specifies that the program would be implemented and a 
referendum conducted three years after assessments first begin under 
the Order. The Order would not continue unless it is approved by a 
majority of those persons voting in the referendum for approval.
    Section 1214.81(b) of the proposed Order specifies criteria for 
subsequent referenda. Under the Order, a referendum would be held to 
ascertain whether the program should continue, be amended, or be 
terminated. This section specifies that a referendum would be held 
every seven years to determine whether producers and importers favor 
continuation of the Order. The Order would continue if favored by a 
majority of producers and importers voting in the referendum.
    Additionally, a referendum could be conducted at the request of the 
Board. A referendum could also be conducted at the request of 10 
percent or more of the number of persons eligible to vote in a 
referendum under the Order. Finally, a referendum could be conducted at 
any time as determined by the Secretary.

Other Miscellaneous Provisions

    Section 1214.80 and Sec. Sec.  1214.82 through 1214.88 describe the 
rights of the Secretary; authorize the Secretary to suspend or 
terminate the Order when deemed appropriate; prescribe proceedings 
after termination; address personal liability, separability, and 
amendments; and provide OMB control numbers. These provisions are 
common to all research and promotion programs authorized under the 1996 
Act.

[[Page 68519]]

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the proposed rule on 
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this action on small entities.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration defines, 
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those having annual 
receipts of no more than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms 
(producers and importers) as those having annual receipts of no more 
than $7.0 million.
    Under these criteria, the majority of the producers that would be 
affected by this Proposed Order would be considered small entities, 
while most importers would not. Producers and importers who 
domestically produce or imported less than 500 Christmas trees annually 
would be exempt from the assessment. Organic producers and importers 
also would be exempt from assessments. The number of entities assessed 
under the program would be approximately 3,263. Estimated revenue is 
expected at $2 million of which 10 percent is expected from imported 
product and 90 percent from domestic product.
    According to the Task Force, based on data from the 2007 Census of 
Agriculture, there were approximately 12,255 Christmas tree farms that 
produced Christmas trees in the United States. Approximately 25 percent 
of the producers, or 3,100 Christmas tree producers, would be subject 
to the assessment based on the exemption of those producing less than 
500 trees would be exempt from assessments. Approximately 95 percent of 
these producers subject to the assessment would be considered small 
entities under SBA criteria. During 2007, 47 out of 50 States produced 
Christmas trees in the United States. Oregon, Michigan, Wisconsin, 
North Carolina, and Pennsylvania together produced more than 75 percent 
of the trees produced in 2007. In 2008, there were approximately 200 
importers. Based on the 2008 U.S. Customs data, 163 importers that 
imported more than 500 Christmas trees would be subject to the 
assessment rate under the proposed Order.
    This proposed rule invites comments on a proposed industry-funded 
research, promotion, and information program for fresh cut Christmas 
trees. The program would be financed by an assessment on Christmas tree 
producers and importers and would be administered by a board of 
industry members selected by the Secretary. The initial assessment rate 
would be $0.15 per Christmas tree domestically produced or imported to 
the United States and could be increased to $0.20 per Christmas tree. 
Entities that domestically produce or import less than 500 Christmas 
trees within a crop year would be exempt. The purpose of the program 
would be to strengthen the position of Christmas trees in the 
marketplace, and maintain and expand markets for Christmas trees. A 
referendum would be held among eligible producers and importers to 
determine whether they favor implementation of the program three years 
after the first assessments begin. The Order would continue if favored 
by a majority of producers and importers voting in the referendum. The 
program is authorized under the 1996 Act.
    Regarding the economic impact of the proposed Order on affected 
entities, Christmas tree producers and importers would be required to 
pay assessments to the Board. As previously mentioned, the initial 
assessment rate would be $0.15 per Christmas tree domestically produced 
or imported to the United States and could be increased to no more than 
$0.20 per Christmas tree.
    Regarding the impact on the industry as a whole, the proposed 
program is expected to help stabilize prices and grow demand for fresh 
cut Christmas trees. The Christmas tree industry hopes to achieve a 
stable funding base to promote Christmas now and into the future.
    Regarding alternatives, the Christmas tree industry has already 
considered and implemented voluntary programs, but based on past 
experience, these programs only worked in the short term; until monies 
were depleted.
    This action would impose additional reporting and recordkeeping 
burden on producers and importers of fresh cut Christmas trees. 
Producers and importers interested in serving on the Board may be asked 
to submit a nomination form to the Board indicating their desire to 
serve or nominating another industry member to serve on the Board. 
Interested persons would also submit a background statement outlining 
their qualifications to serve on the Board. Producers and importers 
would have the opportunity to cast a ballot and vote for candidates to 
serve on the Board. Producer and importer nominees to the Board would 
have to submit a background form to the Secretary to ensure they are 
qualified to serve on the Board.
    Additionally, producers and importers who domestically produce or 
import less than 500 Christmas trees annually could submit a request to 
the Board for an exemption from paying assessments on this volume. 
Producers and importers also would report regarding their sales/imports 
that would accompany their assessments paid to the Board. Producers and 
importers who would qualify as 100 percent organic under the NOP could 
submit a request to the Board for an exemption from assessments.
    Finally, producers and importers who wanted to participate in a 
referendum to vote on whether the Order should continue would have to 
complete a ballot for submission to the Secretary. These forms are 
being submitted to OMB for approval under OMB Control No. 0581-NEW. 
Specific burdens for the forms are detailed later in this document in 
the section titled Paperwork Reduction Act. As with all Federal 
promotion programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to 
reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public 
sector agencies. Finally, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal 
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    Regarding outreach efforts, as previously mentioned, the Task Force 
conducted sessions throughout the United Sates in different States and 
regions. These were held in conjunction with regional and state 
organization meetings. Approximately 50 sessions were held across the 
United States. Input regarding the proposed program was incorporated 
into the Task Force's proposal.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35), AMS announces its intention to request an approval of a 
new information collection and recordkeeping requirements for the 
proposed Christmas tree program.
    Title: Research and Promotion Background Information.
    OMB Number for background form AD-755: (Approved under OMB No. 
0505-0001).
    Expiration Date of Approval: Awaiting renewal.

[[Page 68520]]

    Title: National Research, Promotion, and Consumer Information 
Programs.
    OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
    Expiration Date of Approval: 7/31/2012.
    Type of Request: New information collection for research and 
promotion programs.
    Abstract: The information collection requirements in the request 
are essential to carry out the intent of the 1996 Act. The information 
collection concerns a proposal received by USDA for a national research 
and promotion program for the Christmas tree industry. The program 
would be financed by an assessment on Christmas tree producers and 
importers and would be administered by a board of industry members 
selected by the Secretary. The program would provide for an exemption 
for producers and importers that domestically produce or import less 
than 500 Christmas trees during the year. A referendum would be held 
among eligible producers and importers to determine whether they favor 
continuation of the program three years after assessments first begin. 
The purpose of the program would be to help increase demand for fresh 
cut Christmas trees.
    In summary, the information collection requirements under the 
program concern Board nominations, refunds of assessments, exemption 
applications, and the collection of assessments. For Board nominations, 
producers and importers interested in serving on the Board would be 
asked to submit a ``Nomination Form'' to the Board indicating their 
desire to serve or to nominate another industry member to serve on the 
Board. Producers and importers would have the opportunity to submit a 
``Nomination Ballot'' to the Board where they would vote for candidates 
to serve on the Board. Nominees would also have to submit a background 
information form, ``AD-755,'' to the Secretary to ensure they are 
qualified to serve on the Board.
    Regarding assessments, producers and importers who domestically 
produce or import less than 500 Christmas trees annually could submit a 
request, ``Application for Exemption from Assessments,'' to the Board 
for an exemption from paying assessments. Producers and importers may 
be asked to submit a ``Sales/Import Report'' that would accompany their 
assessments paid to the Board and report the quantity of Christmas 
trees domestically produced or imported during the applicable period, 
the quantity for which assessments were paid, and the port of entry 
(for imports). As previously mentioned, the majority of importer 
assessments would be collected by Customs. Customs would remit the 
funds to the Board along with this information. Finally, producers and 
importers who would qualify as 100 percent organic under the NOP could 
submit an ``Organic Exemption Form'' to the Board and request an 
exemption from assessments.
    Producers and importers would also file a form to request a refund 
of assessments paid if the referendum fails to pass. A referendum is 
proposed to be conducted three years after the assessments first begin 
to determine if producers and importers favor the continuance of the 
Order.
    There would also be an additional burden on producers and importers 
voting in referenda. The referendum ballot, which represents the 
information collection requirement relating to referenda, is addressed 
in a proposed rule on referendum procedures which is published 
separately in this issue of the Federal Register.
    Information collection requirements that are included in this 
proposal include:

(1) Background Information Form AD-755 (OMB Form No. 0505-0001)

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.5 hour per application.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8 (24 for initial nominations to 
the Board, 8 in subsequent years).
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1 every 3 years 
(0.3).
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 12 hours for the 
initial nominations to the Board and 4 hours annually thereafter.

(2) Sales/Import Report by Each Producer or Importer of Christmas Trees

    Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per producer reporting on 
Christmas trees produced.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,110.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,555 hours.

(3) An Exemption Application for Producers and Importers Who Are Exempt 
From Assessments

    Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per producers or 
importer reporting on Christmas trees sold or imported. Upon approval 
of an application, producers and importers will receive exemption 
certification.
    Respondents: Exempt producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 9,192.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,298 hours.

(4) Application for Reimbursement of Assessment

    Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per request for 
reimbursement.
    Respondents: Importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 37.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 9.25 hours.

(5) A Requirement To Maintain Records Sufficient To Verify Reports 
Submitted Under the Order

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for keeping this 
information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per recordkeeper 
maintaining such records.
    Recordkeepers: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 12,455.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Hours: 6,227.5 hours.

(6) Nomination Form

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 40.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 10.00 hours.

(7) Background Statement

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.25 hour per application.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 40.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.

[[Page 68521]]

    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 10.00.

(8) Nomination Ballot

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.25 hours per application.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,200.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 300 hours.

(9) Organic Exemption Form

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per exemption form.
    Respondents: Producers and importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2.5 hours.

(10) Application for Refund Form

    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per refund form.
    Respondents: Producers, importers and organic producers and 
importers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 325.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 162.5.
    As noted above, under the proposed program, producers and importers 
would be required to pay assessments and file reports with and submit 
assessments to the Board (importers through Customs). While the 
proposed Order would impose certain recordkeeping requirements on 
producers and importers, information required under the proposed Order 
could be compiled from records currently maintained. Such records shall 
be retained for at least two years beyond the marketing year of their 
applicability.
    An estimated 12,455 respondents would provide information to the 
Board (12,255 producers and 200 importers). The estimated cost of 
providing the information to the Board by respondents would be 
$348,975. This total has been estimated by multiplying 10,575 total 
hours required for reporting and recordkeeping by $33, the average mean 
hourly earnings of various occupations involved in keeping this 
information. Data for computation of this hourly rate was obtained from 
the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.
    The proposed Order's provisions have been carefully reviewed, and 
every effort has been made to minimize any unnecessary recordkeeping 
costs or requirements, including efforts to utilize information already 
submitted under other programs administered by USDA and other state 
programs.
    The proposed forms would require the minimum information necessary 
to effectively carry out the requirements of the program, and their use 
is necessary to fulfill the intent of the 1996 Act. Such information 
can be supplied without data processing equipment or outside technical 
expertise. In addition, there are no additional training requirements 
for individuals filling out reports and remitting assessments to the 
Board. The forms would be simple, easy to understand, and place as 
small a burden as possible on the person required to file the 
information.
    Collecting information quarterly would coincide with normal 
industry business practices. The timing and frequency of collecting 
information are intended to meet the needs of the industry while 
minimizing the amount of work necessary to fill out the required 
reports. The requirement to keep records for two years is consistent 
with normal industry practices. In addition, the information to be 
included on these forms is not available from other sources because 
such information relates specifically to individual producers and 
importers who are subject to the provisions of the 1996 Act. Therefore, 
there is no practical method for collecting the required information 
without the use of these forms.

Request for Public Comment Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the 
proposed Order and USDA's oversight of the proposed Order, including 
whether the information would have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of USDA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (c) the accuracy of USDA's estimate of the principal producing 
areas in the United States for Christmas trees; (d) the accuracy of 
USDA's estimate of the number of producers and importers of Christmas 
trees that would be covered under the program; (e) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 
(f) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Comments concerning the information collection requirements 
contained in this action should reference OMB No. 0581-NEW. In 
addition, the docket number, date, and page number of this issue of the 
Federal Register also should be referenced. Comments should be sent to 
the same addresses referenced in the ADDRESSES section of this proposed 
rule.
    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
in