Notice of Availability of Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permits for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4), 67960-67962 [2010-27904]
Download as PDF
67960
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. RM06–16–011]
North American Electric Reliability
Corporation; Notice of Compliance
Filing
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Take notice that on October 25, 2010,
the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation (NERC), submitted a
compliance filing in response to the
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (Commission) Order
Granting Rehearing for Further
Consideration and Scheduling
Technical Conference, issued on May
13, 2010.1
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the
comment date, it is not necessary to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
October 28, 2010.
1 Order Granting Rehearing for Further
Consideration and Scheduling Technical
Conference, 131 FERC ¶61,136 (May 13, 2010).
[FR Doc. 2010–27794 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
[FR Doc. 2010–27792 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
serve motions to intervene or protests
on persons other than the Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on November 5, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–27793 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
serve motions to intervene or protests
on persons other than the Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on November 15, 2010.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
p. With this notice, we are initiating
consultation with the COLORADO
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
OFFICER (SHPO), as required by 106,
National Historic Preservation Act, and
the regulations of the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR pt.
800.4.
q. Procedural Schedule and Final
Amendments: We intend to accept the
consultation that has occurred on this
project during the pre-filing period as
satisfying our requirements for the
standard 3-stage consultation process
under 18 CFR 4.38 and for National
Environmental Policy Act scoping.
Based on a review of the application,
resource agency consultation letters,
and comments filed to date,
Commission staff intends to prepare a
single environmental assessment (EA)
for the proposed project.
[FRL–9221–1]
[Docket No. EF11–1–000]
Southeastern Power Administration;
Notice of Filing
October 28, 2010.
Take notice that on October 6, 2010,
the Southeastern Power Administration,
pursuant to Order No. 714,1 submitted
its Baseline Filing, to be effective
October 6, 2010.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the
comment date, it is not necessary to
1 Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,276 (2008).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Availability of Draft National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) General Permits for
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
Systems (MS4)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft
NPDES General Permits.
AGENCY:
The Director of the Office of
Ecosystem Protection, Environmental
Protection Agency-Region 1 (EPA), is
issuing this Notice of Availability of
Draft NPDES general permits for
discharges from small MS4s to certain
waters of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts. These draft NPDES
general permits establish Notice of
Intent (NOI) requirements, prohibitions,
and management practices for
stormwater discharges from small MS4s.
EPA is proposing to issue three general
permits. Throughout this document the
terms ‘‘this permit’’ and ‘‘the permit’’ will
refer to all three general permits.
Owner and/or operators of small
MS4s that discharge stormwater will be
required to submit a NOI to EPA-Region
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
1 to be covered by the general permit.
Following a review and public notice of
the NOI, MS4s will receive a written
notification from EPA regarding permit
coverage and authorization to discharge
under the general permit. The eligibility
requirements are discussed in the draft
permit. The small MS4 must meet the
eligibility requirements of the permit
prior to the submission of the NOI.
The draft general permit, appendices,
and fact sheet are available at: https://
www.epa.gov/region1/npdes/
stormwater.
The public comment period is
from November 4, 2010 to December 30,
2010. Interested persons may submit
comments on the draft general permit as
part of the administrative record to the
EPA-Region 1, at the address given
below, no later than midnight December
30, 2010. The general permit shall be
effective on the date specified in the
Federal Register publication of the
Notice of Availability of the final
general permit. The final general permit
will expire five years from the effective
date.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of
the following methods:
• E-mail: Renahan.Kate@epa.gov.
• Mail: Kate Renahan, U.S. EPARegion 1, Office of the Regional
Administrator, 5 Post Office Square—
Suite 100, Mail Code—ORA01–1,
Boston, MA 02109–3912.
No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
The draft permit is based on an
administrative record available for
public review at EPA-Region 1, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109–3912. The
following SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section sets forth principal facts and the
significant factual, legal, and policy
questions considered in the
development of the draft permit. A
reasonable fee may be charged for
copying requests.
Public Meeting Information: EPARegion 1 will hold a public meeting to
provide information about the draft
general permit and its requirements.
The public meeting will include a brief
presentation on the draft general
permits and a brief question and answer
session. Written, but not oral, comments
for the official draft permit record will
be accepted at the public meeting. The
public meeting will be held at the
following time and location: Thursday–
December 2, 2010, Lakeville Public
Library (Large Meeting Room),
4 Precinct Street, Lakeville, MA 02347,
10:15 a.m.–11:15 a.m.
The dates and times of any additional
public meetings will be posted on EPA-
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
Region 1’s Web site at: https://
www.epa.gov/region1/topics/water/
stormwater.html.
Public Hearing Information:
Following the public meeting, a public
hearing will be conducted in accordance
with 40 CFR 124.12 and will provide
interested parties with the opportunity
to provide written and/or oral
comments for the official draft permit
record. The public hearing will be held
at the following time and location:
Thursday–December 2, 2010, Lakeville
Public Library (Large Meeting Room), 4
Precinct Street, Lakeville, MA 02347,
11:30 a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information concerning the
draft permit may be obtained between
the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday excluding holidays from:
Kate Renahan, Office of the Regional
Administrator, Environmental
Protection Agency, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Mail Code: ORA01–
1, Boston, MA 02109–3912; telephone:
617–918–1491; e-mail:
Renahan.Kate@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background of Proposed Permit
As stated previously, the Director of
the Office of Ecosystem Protection, EPARegion 1, is proposing to reissue three
NPDES general permits for the discharge
of stormwater from small MS4s to
certain waters within the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The
three permits are:
MAR041000—Systems owned by
traditional cities and towns.
MAR042000– Systems owned by state
or Federal entities.
MAR04000I—Systems located on
Indian Country Land within the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
The conditions in the draft permit are
established pursuant to Clean Water Act
(CWA) section 402(p)(3)(iii) to ensure
that pollutant discharges from small
MS4s are reduced to the maximum
extent practicable (MEP), protect water
quality, and satisfy the appropriate
requirements of the CWA. The
regulations at 40 CFR 122.26(b)(16)
define a small municipal separate storm
sewer system as ‘‘* * * all separate
storm sewers that are:
(1) Owned or operated by the United
States, a State, city, town, borough,
county, parish, district, association, or
other public body (created by or
pursuant to State law) having
jurisdiction over disposal of sewage,
industrial wastes, stormwater, or other
wastes, including special districts under
State law such as a sewer district, flood
control district or drainage district, or
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67961
similar entity, or an Indian Tribe or an
authorized Indian Tribal organization,
or a designated and approved
management agency under section 208
of the CWA that discharges to waters of
the United States.
(2) Not defined as ‘large’ or ‘medium’
municipal separate storm sewer systems
pursuant to paragraphs (b)(4) or (b)(7) or
designated under paragraph (a)(1)(v) of
this section [40 CFR 122.26].
(3) This term includes systems similar
to separate storm sewer systems in
municipalities such as systems at
military bases, large hospital or prison
complexes, and highways or other
thoroughfares. The term does not
include separate storm sewers in very
discrete areas, such as individual
buildings.’’
For example, an armory located in an
urbanized area would not be considered
a regulated small MS4.
The draft general permit sets forth the
requirements for the small MS4 to
‘‘reduce the discharge of pollutants to
the maximum extent practicable,
including management practices,
control techniques, and system, design
and engineering methods * * *’’ (See
section 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA).
MEP is the statutory standard that
establishes the level of pollutant
reductions that MS4 operators must
achieve, but also includes recognition
that other provisions in addition to MEP
may be required under some
circumstances. EPA believes
implementation of best management
practices (BMPs) designed to control
stormwater runoff from the MS4 is
generally the most appropriate approach
for reducing pollutants to satisfy the
MEP standard. Pursuant to 40 CFR
122.44(k), the draft permit requires
permittees to control stormwater
discharges through BMPs, including
development and implementation of a
comprehensive stormwater management
program (SWMP) as the mechanism to
achieve the required pollutant
reductions.
Section 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of CWA also
authorizes EPA to include in an MS4
permit ‘‘such other provisions as [EPA]
determine appropriate for control of
* * * pollutants.’’ EPA believes that
this provision forms a basis for
imposing water quality-based effluent
limitations (WQBELs), consistent with
the authority in Section 301(b)(1)(C) of
the CWA. See Defenders of Wildlife v.
Browner. 191 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1999);
see also EPA’s preamble to the Phase II
regulations, 64 FR 68722, 68753, 68788
(Dec. 8, 1999). Accordingly, the draft
permits contain the water quality-based
effluent limitations, expressed in terms
of BMPs, which EPA determined are
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
67962
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
necessary and appropriate under the
CWA.
EPA-Region 1 issued a final general
permit to address stormwater discharges
from small MS4s on May 1, 2003. The
2003 general permit required small
MS4s to develop and implement a
SWMP designed to control pollutants to
the maximum extent practicable and
protect water quality. This draft permit
builds on the requirements of the
previous general permit.
EPA views the MEP standard in the
CWA as an iterative process. MEP
should continually adapt to current
conditions and BMP effectiveness. EPA
believes that compliance with the
requirements of this general permit will
meet the MEP standard. The iterative
process of MEP consists of a
municipality developing a program
consistent with specific permit
requirements, implementing the
program, evaluating the effectiveness of
the BMPs included as part of the
program, then revising those parts of the
program that are not effective at
controlling pollutants, then
implementing the revisions, and
evaluating again. The changes contained
in the draft general permits reflect the
iterative process of MEP. Accordingly,
the draft general permits contain more
specific tasks and details than the 2003
general permit.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Permit Conditions
Obtaining Authorization
In order for a small MS4 to obtain
authorization to discharge, it must
submit a complete and accurate NOI
containing the information in Appendix
F of the draft general permit. The NOI
must be submitted within 90 days of the
effective date of the final permit. The
effective date of the final permit will be
specified in the Federal Register
publication of the Notice of Availability
of the final permit. A small MS4 must
meet the eligibility requirements of the
general permit found in Part 1.2 and
Part 1.9 prior to submission of its NOI.
A small MS4 will be authorized to
discharge under the permit upon the
effective date of coverage. The effective
date of coverage is upon receipt of
written notice from EPA following a
public notice of the NOI.
The draft general permit provides
interim coverage for permittees covered
by the previous permit and whose
coverage was effective upon the
expiration date of that permit (May 1,
2008). For those discharges covered by
the previous permit, authorization
under the previous permit is continued
automatically on an interim basis for up
to 180 days from the effective date of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
final permit. Interim authorization will
terminate earlier than the 180 days
when a complete and accurate NOI has
been submitted by the small MS4 and
authorization is either granted or
denied. If a permittee was authorized
under the previous permit and
submitted a complete and accurate NOI
in a timely manner, and notification of
authorization under the final permit has
not occurred within 180 days of the
effective date of the final permit, the
permittee’s authorization under the
previous permit can be continued
beyond 180 days on an interim basis.
Interim coverage will terminate after
authorization under this general permit,
an alternative permit, or denial of
permit coverage.
EPA—Region 1 will provide an
opportunity for the public to comment
on each NOI that is submitted.
Following the public notice, EPA—
Region 1 will either authorize the
discharge, request additional
information, or require the small MS4 to
apply for an alternative permit or an
individual permit.
Water Quality-Based Effluent
Limitations
The draft permit includes provisions
designed to protect water quality
standards. The provisions in Parts 2.1,
2.2, and 2.3 of the general permit
constitute the water quality-based
effluent limitations of the permit. The
purpose of this part of the permit is to
include water quality-based effluent
limitations for those discharges
requiring additional controls in order to
achieve water quality standards and
other water quality related objectives.
EPA invites comments on its approach
to addressing water quality standards in
this draft permit.
Non-Numeric Effluent Limitations
When EPA has not promulgated
effluent limitations for a category of
discharges, or if an operator is
discharging a pollutant not covered by
an effluent limitation guideline, effluent
limitations may be based on the best
professional judgment (BPJ) of the
agency or permit writer. The BPJ limits
in the general permit are in the form of
non-numeric control measures,
commonly referred to as best
management practices (BMPs). Nonnumeric limits are employed under
limited circumstances, as described in
40 CFR 122.44(k). EPA has interpreted
the CWA to allow BMPs to take the
place of numeric effluent limitations
under certain circumstances. 40 CFR
122.44(k) provides that permits may
include BMPs to control or abate the
discharge of pollutants when: ‘‘(1)
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
[a]uthorized under section 304(e) of the
CWA for the control of toxic pollutants
and hazardous substances from
ancillary industrial activities; (2)
[a]uthorized under section 402(p) of the
CWA for the control of stormwater
discharges; (3) [n]umeric effluent
limitations are infeasible; or (4) [t]he
practices are reasonable to achieve
effluent limitations and standards or to
carry out the purposes and intent of the
CWA.’’ The permit regulates stormwater
discharges using BMPs. Due to the
variability associated with stormwater,
EPA believes the use of BMPs is the
most appropriate method to regulate
discharges of stormwater from
municipal systems in accordance with
the above referenced regulation.
The draft permit requires small MS4s
to continue to control stormwater
discharges from the municipal system in
a manner designed to reduce the
discharge of pollutant to the maximum
extent practicable and to protect water
quality. The small MS4s are required to
implement a SWMP consisting of
control measures. These control
measures include the following: Public
education and outreach; public
participation; illicit discharge detection
and elimination; construction
stormwater management; stormwater
management in new development and
redevelopment; and good housekeeping
in municipal operations.
Implementation of the SWMP involves
the identification of BMPs and
measurable goals for BMPs. The draft
permit identifies an objective for each
control measure. The small MS4 must
implement the control measures
required by the general permit and
document actions in the SWMP that
demonstrate progress toward
achievement of the objective of the
control measure. The permit also
contains outfall monitoring
requirements that are associated with
implementation of the illicit discharge
detection and elimination program, as
well as record keeping and reporting
requirements.
Dated: October 27, 2010.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2010–27904 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67960-67962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27904]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9221-1]
Notice of Availability of Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permits for Small Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems (MS4)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft NPDES General Permits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Director of the Office of Ecosystem Protection,
Environmental Protection Agency-Region 1 (EPA), is issuing this Notice
of Availability of Draft NPDES general permits for discharges from
small MS4s to certain waters of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
These draft NPDES general permits establish Notice of Intent (NOI)
requirements, prohibitions, and management practices for stormwater
discharges from small MS4s. EPA is proposing to issue three general
permits. Throughout this document the terms ``this permit'' and ``the
permit'' will refer to all three general permits.
Owner and/or operators of small MS4s that discharge stormwater will
be required to submit a NOI to EPA-Region
[[Page 67961]]
1 to be covered by the general permit. Following a review and public
notice of the NOI, MS4s will receive a written notification from EPA
regarding permit coverage and authorization to discharge under the
general permit. The eligibility requirements are discussed in the draft
permit. The small MS4 must meet the eligibility requirements of the
permit prior to the submission of the NOI.
The draft general permit, appendices, and fact sheet are available
at: https://www.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater.
DATES: The public comment period is from November 4, 2010 to December
30, 2010. Interested persons may submit comments on the draft general
permit as part of the administrative record to the EPA-Region 1, at the
address given below, no later than midnight December 30, 2010. The
general permit shall be effective on the date specified in the Federal
Register publication of the Notice of Availability of the final general
permit. The final general permit will expire five years from the
effective date.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of the following methods:
E-mail: Renahan.Kate@epa.gov.
Mail: Kate Renahan, U.S. EPA-Region 1, Office of the
Regional Administrator, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Mail Code--
ORA01-1, Boston, MA 02109-3912.
No facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
The draft permit is based on an administrative record available for
public review at EPA-Region 1, Office of Ecosystem Protection, 5 Post
Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912. The
following SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section sets forth principal facts
and the significant factual, legal, and policy questions considered in
the development of the draft permit. A reasonable fee may be charged
for copying requests.
Public Meeting Information: EPA-Region 1 will hold a public meeting
to provide information about the draft general permit and its
requirements. The public meeting will include a brief presentation on
the draft general permits and a brief question and answer session.
Written, but not oral, comments for the official draft permit record
will be accepted at the public meeting. The public meeting will be held
at the following time and location: Thursday-December 2, 2010,
Lakeville Public Library (Large Meeting Room), 4 Precinct Street,
Lakeville, MA 02347, 10:15 a.m.-11:15 a.m.
The dates and times of any additional public meetings will be
posted on EPA-Region 1's Web site at: https://www.epa.gov/region1/topics/water/stormwater.html.
Public Hearing Information: Following the public meeting, a public
hearing will be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 124.12 and will
provide interested parties with the opportunity to provide written and/
or oral comments for the official draft permit record. The public
hearing will be held at the following time and location: Thursday-
December 2, 2010, Lakeville Public Library (Large Meeting Room), 4
Precinct Street, Lakeville, MA 02347, 11:30 a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the
draft permit may be obtained between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday excluding holidays from: Kate Renahan, Office of
the Regional Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 5 Post
Office Square--Suite 100, Mail Code: ORA01-1, Boston, MA 02109-3912;
telephone: 617-918-1491; e-mail: Renahan.Kate@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background of Proposed Permit
As stated previously, the Director of the Office of Ecosystem
Protection, EPA- Region 1, is proposing to reissue three NPDES general
permits for the discharge of stormwater from small MS4s to certain
waters within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The three permits are:
MAR041000--Systems owned by traditional cities and towns.
MAR042000- Systems owned by state or Federal entities.
MAR04000I--Systems located on Indian Country Land within the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
The conditions in the draft permit are established pursuant to
Clean Water Act (CWA) section 402(p)(3)(iii) to ensure that pollutant
discharges from small MS4s are reduced to the maximum extent
practicable (MEP), protect water quality, and satisfy the appropriate
requirements of the CWA. The regulations at 40 CFR 122.26(b)(16) define
a small municipal separate storm sewer system as ``* * * all separate
storm sewers that are:
(1) Owned or operated by the United States, a State, city, town,
borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body
(created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal
of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including
special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood
control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian
Tribe or an authorized Indian Tribal organization, or a designated and
approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that discharges
to waters of the United States.
(2) Not defined as `large' or `medium' municipal separate storm
sewer systems pursuant to paragraphs (b)(4) or (b)(7) or designated
under paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section [40 CFR 122.26].
(3) This term includes systems similar to separate storm sewer
systems in municipalities such as systems at military bases, large
hospital or prison complexes, and highways or other thoroughfares. The
term does not include separate storm sewers in very discrete areas,
such as individual buildings.''
For example, an armory located in an urbanized area would not be
considered a regulated small MS4.
The draft general permit sets forth the requirements for the small
MS4 to ``reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent
practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and
system, design and engineering methods * * *'' (See section
402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA). MEP is the statutory standard that
establishes the level of pollutant reductions that MS4 operators must
achieve, but also includes recognition that other provisions in
addition to MEP may be required under some circumstances. EPA believes
implementation of best management practices (BMPs) designed to control
stormwater runoff from the MS4 is generally the most appropriate
approach for reducing pollutants to satisfy the MEP standard. Pursuant
to 40 CFR 122.44(k), the draft permit requires permittees to control
stormwater discharges through BMPs, including development and
implementation of a comprehensive stormwater management program (SWMP)
as the mechanism to achieve the required pollutant reductions.
Section 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of CWA also authorizes EPA to include in
an MS4 permit ``such other provisions as [EPA] determine appropriate
for control of * * * pollutants.'' EPA believes that this provision
forms a basis for imposing water quality-based effluent limitations
(WQBELs), consistent with the authority in Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the
CWA. See Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner. 191 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir.
1999); see also EPA's preamble to the Phase II regulations, 64 FR
68722, 68753, 68788 (Dec. 8, 1999). Accordingly, the draft permits
contain the water quality-based effluent limitations, expressed in
terms of BMPs, which EPA determined are
[[Page 67962]]
necessary and appropriate under the CWA.
EPA-Region 1 issued a final general permit to address stormwater
discharges from small MS4s on May 1, 2003. The 2003 general permit
required small MS4s to develop and implement a SWMP designed to control
pollutants to the maximum extent practicable and protect water quality.
This draft permit builds on the requirements of the previous general
permit.
EPA views the MEP standard in the CWA as an iterative process. MEP
should continually adapt to current conditions and BMP effectiveness.
EPA believes that compliance with the requirements of this general
permit will meet the MEP standard. The iterative process of MEP
consists of a municipality developing a program consistent with
specific permit requirements, implementing the program, evaluating the
effectiveness of the BMPs included as part of the program, then
revising those parts of the program that are not effective at
controlling pollutants, then implementing the revisions, and evaluating
again. The changes contained in the draft general permits reflect the
iterative process of MEP. Accordingly, the draft general permits
contain more specific tasks and details than the 2003 general permit.
Summary of Permit Conditions
Obtaining Authorization
In order for a small MS4 to obtain authorization to discharge, it
must submit a complete and accurate NOI containing the information in
Appendix F of the draft general permit. The NOI must be submitted
within 90 days of the effective date of the final permit. The effective
date of the final permit will be specified in the Federal Register
publication of the Notice of Availability of the final permit. A small
MS4 must meet the eligibility requirements of the general permit found
in Part 1.2 and Part 1.9 prior to submission of its NOI. A small MS4
will be authorized to discharge under the permit upon the effective
date of coverage. The effective date of coverage is upon receipt of
written notice from EPA following a public notice of the NOI.
The draft general permit provides interim coverage for permittees
covered by the previous permit and whose coverage was effective upon
the expiration date of that permit (May 1, 2008). For those discharges
covered by the previous permit, authorization under the previous permit
is continued automatically on an interim basis for up to 180 days from
the effective date of the final permit. Interim authorization will
terminate earlier than the 180 days when a complete and accurate NOI
has been submitted by the small MS4 and authorization is either granted
or denied. If a permittee was authorized under the previous permit and
submitted a complete and accurate NOI in a timely manner, and
notification of authorization under the final permit has not occurred
within 180 days of the effective date of the final permit, the
permittee's authorization under the previous permit can be continued
beyond 180 days on an interim basis. Interim coverage will terminate
after authorization under this general permit, an alternative permit,
or denial of permit coverage.
EPA--Region 1 will provide an opportunity for the public to comment
on each NOI that is submitted. Following the public notice, EPA--Region
1 will either authorize the discharge, request additional information,
or require the small MS4 to apply for an alternative permit or an
individual permit.
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations
The draft permit includes provisions designed to protect water
quality standards. The provisions in Parts 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 of the
general permit constitute the water quality-based effluent limitations
of the permit. The purpose of this part of the permit is to include
water quality-based effluent limitations for those discharges requiring
additional controls in order to achieve water quality standards and
other water quality related objectives. EPA invites comments on its
approach to addressing water quality standards in this draft permit.
Non-Numeric Effluent Limitations
When EPA has not promulgated effluent limitations for a category of
discharges, or if an operator is discharging a pollutant not covered by
an effluent limitation guideline, effluent limitations may be based on
the best professional judgment (BPJ) of the agency or permit writer.
The BPJ limits in the general permit are in the form of non-numeric
control measures, commonly referred to as best management practices
(BMPs). Non-numeric limits are employed under limited circumstances, as
described in 40 CFR 122.44(k). EPA has interpreted the CWA to allow
BMPs to take the place of numeric effluent limitations under certain
circumstances. 40 CFR 122.44(k) provides that permits may include BMPs
to control or abate the discharge of pollutants when: ``(1)
[a]uthorized under section 304(e) of the CWA for the control of toxic
pollutants and hazardous substances from ancillary industrial
activities; (2) [a]uthorized under section 402(p) of the CWA for the
control of stormwater discharges; (3) [n]umeric effluent limitations
are infeasible; or (4) [t]he practices are reasonable to achieve
effluent limitations and standards or to carry out the purposes and
intent of the CWA.'' The permit regulates stormwater discharges using
BMPs. Due to the variability associated with stormwater, EPA believes
the use of BMPs is the most appropriate method to regulate discharges
of stormwater from municipal systems in accordance with the above
referenced regulation.
The draft permit requires small MS4s to continue to control
stormwater discharges from the municipal system in a manner designed to
reduce the discharge of pollutant to the maximum extent practicable and
to protect water quality. The small MS4s are required to implement a
SWMP consisting of control measures. These control measures include the
following: Public education and outreach; public participation; illicit
discharge detection and elimination; construction stormwater
management; stormwater management in new development and redevelopment;
and good housekeeping in municipal operations. Implementation of the
SWMP involves the identification of BMPs and measurable goals for BMPs.
The draft permit identifies an objective for each control measure. The
small MS4 must implement the control measures required by the general
permit and document actions in the SWMP that demonstrate progress
toward achievement of the objective of the control measure. The permit
also contains outfall monitoring requirements that are associated with
implementation of the illicit discharge detection and elimination
program, as well as record keeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: October 27, 2010.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2010-27904 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P