Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Announcing the Availability of a Draft for Weight-of-Evidence Guidance Document: Evaluating Results of EDSP Tier 1 Screening To Identify Candidate Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing, 67963-67965 [2010-27897]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9220–2]
Availability of Draft NPDES General
Permits MAG580000 and NHG580000
for Discharges From Publicly Owned
Treatment Works Treatment Plants
(POTW Treatment Plants) and Other
Treatment Works Treating Domestic
Sewage in the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts and the State of New
Hampshire
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Director of the Office of
Ecosystem Protection, EPA–New
England, is issuing a notice of
availability for public comment of the
draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general
permits for certain Publicly Owned
Treatment Works Treatment Plants
(POTW treatment plants) and Other
Treatment Works Treating Domestic
Sewage (collectively, ‘‘facilities’’) in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
(including both Commonwealth and
Indian country lands) and the State of
New Hampshire. Throughout this
document, these two permits are
collectively referred to as the ‘‘Publicly
Owned Treatment Works General
Permit’’ (‘‘POTW GP’’ or the ‘‘General
Permit’’). The draft General Permits,
upon final issuance, will replace the
prior POTW GP which expired on
September 23, 2010.
The draft POTW GP establishes
Notice of Intent (NOI) requirements as
well as effluent limitations, standards,
and prohibitions for facilities that
discharge to fresh and marine waters.
Coverage under these General Permits is
available to facilities in Massachusetts
classified as minor facilities and to
facilities in New Hampshire classified
as major or minor facilities. Owners
and/or operators of these facilities,
including those facilities authorized to
discharge under the current General
Permit, will be required to submit an
NOI to be covered by the reissued
POTW GP to both EPA-New England
and the appropriate State agency, in
accordance with the notification
requirements of the General Permit.
Following EPA and the State review of
the NOI, the facility will receive a
written notification from EPA of permit
coverage and authorization to discharge
under the General Permit. The eligibility
requirements for permit coverage,
including the requirement that a facility
have a receiving water dilution factor
equal to or greater than 50, are provided
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
in the General Permit. The General
Permit does not cover new sources as
defined under 40 CFR 122.2.
The purpose of this document is to
solicit public comments on the
proposed General Permits.
Public Comment Period: The public
comment period is from November 4,
2010 to December 6, 2010. Interested
persons may submit written comments
on the draft General Permit to the EPARegion I at the address listed below.
Within the comment period, interested
persons may also request, in writing,
that EPA hold a public hearing pursuant
to 40 CFR Section 124.12, concerning
the draft General Permits. Such requests
shall state the nature of the issues
proposed to be raised at the hearing. A
public hearing may be held at least
thirty days after public notice whenever
the Regional Administrator finds that
response to this notice indicates
significant public interest. In reaching a
final decision on this draft permit, the
Regional Administrator will respond to
all significant comments and make
responses available to the public at
EPA’s Boston office. All comments and
requests for public hearings must be
postmarked or delivered before
midnight December 6, 2010, the close of
the public comment period. All public
comments or requests for a public
hearing must be submitted to the
address below.
Written comments on the
draft General Permit may be hand
delivered or mailed to Meridith Timony,
EPA-Region 1, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, OEP06–1, 5 Post Office
Square-Suite 100, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109–3912; or sent via
e-mail to Timony.meridith@epa.gov. No
facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
ADDRESSES:
For
further information contact Meridith
Timony at 617–918–1533, between the
hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. The
draft General Permits are based on an
administrative record available for
public review at EPA-Region 1, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, 5 Post Office
Square-Suite 100, Boston,
Massachusetts 02109–3912, Monday
through Friday from 9 a.m.–5 p.m.,
excluding holidays. The draft General
Permit and a Fact Sheet may also be
viewed over the Internet via the EPARegion I Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/region1/npdes/potwgp.html. To obtain a paper copy of the
documents, please contact Meridith
Timony using the contact information
provided above. A reasonable fee may
be charged for copying requests.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67963
Dated: October 19, 2010.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2010–27763 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0877; FRL–8849–8]
Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program (EDSP); Announcing the
Availability of a Draft for Weight-ofEvidence Guidance Document:
Evaluating Results of EDSP Tier 1
Screening To Identify Candidate
Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA is announcing the
availability for public review and
comment of a draft guidance document
titled, ‘‘Weight-of-Evidence Guidance
Document: Evaluating Results of EDSP
Tier 1 Screening to Identify Candidate
Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing.’’ This
action is in compliance with a directive
from the House Appropriations
Committee FY 2010 Report directing the
EPA to develop and publish criteria by
October 30, 2010, for evaluating results
of Tier 1 screening and determining
whether a chemical should undergo Tier
2 analysis. The purpose of the weightof-evidence (WoE) document is to set
forth some of the general principles,
criteria, and considerations EPA
generally believes to be relevant under
a WoE approach for evaluating data
submitted as part of EPA’s two-tiered
paradigm for screening and testing
chemicals for endocrine activity (i.e.,
estrogen, androgen, and thyroid
hormonal systems; E, A, and T) under
the EDSP. This document provides a
transparent scientific approach for
broadly evaluating Tier 1 screening data
to detect an interaction with E, A, and/
or T hormonal systems and determine if
additional Tier 2 testing is necessary.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0877, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
67964
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0877.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2010–0877. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Don
Bergfelt, Office of Science Coordination
and Policy (7203M), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (202) 564–
8472; e-mail address:
bergfelt.don@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA–Hotline, ABVI–Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; e-mail address: TSCA–
Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. You may be potentially
affected by this action if you produce,
manufacture, use, consume, work with,
or import industrial or pesticide
chemicals. To determine whether you or
your business may be affected by this
action, you should carefully examine
section 408(p) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (21
U.S.C. 346a(p)) and the Safe Drinking
Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–17).
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Chemical manufacturers, importers
and processors (NAICS code 325), e.g.,
persons who manufacture, import, or
process chemical substances.
• Pesticide, fertilizer, and other
agricultural chemical manufacturers
(NAICS code 3253), e.g., persons who
manufacture, import or process
pesticide, fertilizer, and agricultural
chemicals.
• Scientific research and
development services (NAICS code
5417), e.g., persons who conduct testing
of chemical substances for endocrine
effects.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance document titled,
‘‘Weight-of-Evidence Guidance
Document: Evaluating Results of EDSP
Tier 1 Screening to Identify Candidate
Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing.’’ This
document invites the public to review
and comment on the guidance
document, which is available
electronically at regulations.gov (https://
www.regulations.gov) using docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0877
and the EDSP Web site https://
www.epa.gov/endo.
This document was prepared to
provide a transparent, scientific
approach to set forth some general
principles, criteria, and considerations
EPA generally believes to be relevant
using a WoE approach to evaluate data
submitted as part of EPA’s EDSP
involving a battery of validated Tier 1
screening assays as described in a notice
published in the Federal Register issue
of October 21, 2009 (74 FR 54415) (FRL–
8432–6). The criteria discussed in this
document are based, in part, on EPA’s
experience in developing and applying
risk assessment guidelines involving
cancer, reproductive and developmental
toxicity, and ecological toxicity.
Important considerations include the
use of expert judgment formed through
the scientific process, current
understanding of endocrine
mechanisms of toxicity, and knowledge
of other fields of toxicology (e.g.,
developmental, reproductive,
neurological and immunological
toxicology, and toxicokinetics).
Principles articulated in this document
are equally applicable to a WoE
evaluation of data from individual
assays with multiple endpoints, as well
as across the whole suite of assays in the
EDSP Tier 1 screening battery. In
addition, these principles would be
generally applicable to the review of
other scientifically relevant information
(OSRI) submitted in response to test
orders that request OSRI to be
considered in lieu of designated
screening assays in the Tier 1 battery.
In general, the EDSP is a two-tiered
paradigm for screening and testing
chemicals with the potential to interact
with the endocrine system. Tier 1
screening consists of a battery of
complementary in vitro and short term
in vivo assays designed to maximize
sensitivity for detecting interactions
with the E, A, and/or T hormonal
systems; whereas, Tier 2 testing consists
of a group of individual in vivo tests
designed to include males and females
with an intact hypothalamic-pituitary-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 03, 2010
Jkt 223001
gonadal axis, multiple pathways of
exposure and life-stages, and various
taxa to further identify and characterize
chemical-induced interactions with E,
A, and/or T for risk assessment. The
diversity in endocrine endpoints within
and among the Tier 1 screening assays
is expected to provide corroborating
information and support a WoE
evaluation to yield a decision as to
whether or not the chemical indentified
in Tier 1 requires additional testing in
Tier 2.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 408(p) of FFDCA requires
EPA to ‘‘develop a screening program,
using appropriate validated test systems
and other scientifically relevant
information, to determine whether
certain substances may have an effect in
humans that is similar to an effect
produced by a naturally occurring
estrogen, or such other endocrine effect
as [EPA] may designate.’’ (21 U.S.C.
346a(p)). The statute generally requires
EPA to ‘‘provide for the testing of all
pesticide chemicals.’’ (21 U.S.C.
346a(p)(3)). ‘‘Pesticide chemical’’ is
defined as ‘‘any substance that is a
pesticide within the meaning of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), including all
active and inert ingredients of such
pesticide.’’ (21 U.S.C. 321(q)(1)).
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Endocrine
disruptors, Screening assays, Weight-ofevidence.
Dated: October 27, 2010.
Stephen A. Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–27897 Filed 11–3–10; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9220–9]
Announcement of Local Government
Advisory Committee Members
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency announces that
Administrator Lisa P. Jackson has
appointed 29 local, State, and Tribal
elected and appointed officials from
across the country to serve on the EPA’s
Local Government Advisory Committee
(LGAC). The Committee’s purpose will
be to give advice and recommendations
SUMMARY:
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
on a broad range of environmental
issues affecting local governments.
These new appointments include:
Mayors (Large Cities)
Phil Gordon, Mayor, Phoenix,
Arizona.
John W. Hickenlooper, Mayor,
Denver, Colorado.
Mayors (Moderate Sized Cities)
Jennifer Hosterman, Mayor,
Pleasanton, California.
Terry Bellamy, Mayor, Asheville,
North Carolina.
Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor, Burnsville,
Minnesota.
Teresa Coons, Mayor, Grand Junction,
Colorado.
Dana L. Redd, Mayor, Camden, New
Jersey.
Mayors (Small Cities and Towns)
Bob Dixson, Mayor, Greensburg,
Kansas.
Marilyn Murrell, Mayor, Arcadia,
Oklahoma.
Ronald K. Davis, Mayor, Prichard,
Alabama.
Adam Ortiz, Mayor, Edmonston,
Maryland.
Heather McTeer Hudson, Mayor,
Greenville, Mississippi.
Carolyn Peterson, Mayor, Ithaca, New
York.
Lisa A.Wong, Mayor, Fitchburg,
Massachusetts.
David W. Smith, Mayor, Newark,
California.
Tribal (Elected and Appointed)
Steve Ortiz, Chairman Prairie Band
Potawatomi Nation, Kansas.
Aaron Miles, Manager at Nez Perce
Tribe, Idaho.
Commonwealth
Evelyn Delereme Camacho, Mayor,
Municipality of Vieques, Puerto Rico.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
67965
Sfmt 4703
County Executive
Tom Hickner, County Executive, Bay
County, Michigan.
County Commissioners
*Dave Somers, Councilor, Snohomish
County, Washington.
Robert Cope, Commissioner, Lemhi
County, Idaho.
Salud Carbajal, Supervisor, Santa
Barbara County, California.
Conservation Districts
Jeffrey Tiberi, Director of Montana
Association of Conservation Districts,
Helena, Montana.
City Councilmember
Jill Duson, Councilor, Portland,
Maine.
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67963-67965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0877; FRL-8849-8]
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Announcing the
Availability of a Draft for Weight-of-Evidence Guidance Document:
Evaluating Results of EDSP Tier 1 Screening To Identify Candidate
Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the availability for public review and
comment of a draft guidance document titled, ``Weight-of-Evidence
Guidance Document: Evaluating Results of EDSP Tier 1 Screening to
Identify Candidate Chemicals for Tier 2 Testing.'' This action is in
compliance with a directive from the House Appropriations Committee FY
2010 Report directing the EPA to develop and publish criteria by
October 30, 2010, for evaluating results of Tier 1 screening and
determining whether a chemical should undergo Tier 2 analysis. The
purpose of the weight-of-evidence (WoE) document is to set forth some
of the general principles, criteria, and considerations EPA generally
believes to be relevant under a WoE approach for evaluating data
submitted as part of EPA's two-tiered paradigm for screening and
testing chemicals for endocrine activity (i.e., estrogen, androgen, and
thyroid hormonal systems; E, A, and T) under the EDSP. This document
provides a transparent scientific approach for broadly evaluating Tier
1 screening data to detect an interaction with E, A, and/or T hormonal
systems and determine if additional Tier 2 testing is necessary.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0877, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
[[Page 67964]]
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office
(DCO), EPA East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0877. The
DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the DCO's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2010-0877. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in
hard copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of
operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is
(202) 566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Don
Bergfelt, Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7203M),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8472; e-mail
address: bergfelt.don@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general. You may be
potentially affected by this action if you produce, manufacture, use,
consume, work with, or import industrial or pesticide chemicals. To
determine whether you or your business may be affected by this action,
you should carefully examine section 408(p) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)) and the Safe Drinking Water
Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-17). Potentially affected entities may include, but
are not limited to:
Chemical manufacturers, importers and processors (NAICS
code 325), e.g., persons who manufacture, import, or process chemical
substances.
Pesticide, fertilizer, and other agricultural chemical
manufacturers (NAICS code 3253), e.g., persons who manufacture, import
or process pesticide, fertilizer, and agricultural chemicals.
Scientific research and development services (NAICS code
5417), e.g., persons who conduct testing of chemical substances for
endocrine effects.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
[[Page 67965]]
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance document
titled, ``Weight-of-Evidence Guidance Document: Evaluating Results of
EDSP Tier 1 Screening to Identify Candidate Chemicals for Tier 2
Testing.'' This document invites the public to review and comment on
the guidance document, which is available electronically at
regulations.gov (https://www.regulations.gov) using docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0877 and the EDSP Web site https://www.epa.gov/endo.
This document was prepared to provide a transparent, scientific
approach to set forth some general principles, criteria, and
considerations EPA generally believes to be relevant using a WoE
approach to evaluate data submitted as part of EPA's EDSP involving a
battery of validated Tier 1 screening assays as described in a notice
published in the Federal Register issue of October 21, 2009 (74 FR
54415) (FRL-8432-6). The criteria discussed in this document are based,
in part, on EPA's experience in developing and applying risk assessment
guidelines involving cancer, reproductive and developmental toxicity,
and ecological toxicity. Important considerations include the use of
expert judgment formed through the scientific process, current
understanding of endocrine mechanisms of toxicity, and knowledge of
other fields of toxicology (e.g., developmental, reproductive,
neurological and immunological toxicology, and toxicokinetics).
Principles articulated in this document are equally applicable to a WoE
evaluation of data from individual assays with multiple endpoints, as
well as across the whole suite of assays in the EDSP Tier 1 screening
battery. In addition, these principles would be generally applicable to
the review of other scientifically relevant information (OSRI)
submitted in response to test orders that request OSRI to be considered
in lieu of designated screening assays in the Tier 1 battery.
In general, the EDSP is a two-tiered paradigm for screening and
testing chemicals with the potential to interact with the endocrine
system. Tier 1 screening consists of a battery of complementary in
vitro and short term in vivo assays designed to maximize sensitivity
for detecting interactions with the E, A, and/or T hormonal systems;
whereas, Tier 2 testing consists of a group of individual in vivo tests
designed to include males and females with an intact hypothalamic-
pituitary-gonadal axis, multiple pathways of exposure and life-stages,
and various taxa to further identify and characterize chemical-induced
interactions with E, A, and/or T for risk assessment. The diversity in
endocrine endpoints within and among the Tier 1 screening assays is
expected to provide corroborating information and support a WoE
evaluation to yield a decision as to whether or not the chemical
indentified in Tier 1 requires additional testing in Tier 2.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 408(p) of FFDCA requires EPA to ``develop a screening
program, using appropriate validated test systems and other
scientifically relevant information, to determine whether certain
substances may have an effect in humans that is similar to an effect
produced by a naturally occurring estrogen, or such other endocrine
effect as [EPA] may designate.'' (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)). The statute
generally requires EPA to ``provide for the testing of all pesticide
chemicals.'' (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)(3)). ``Pesticide chemical'' is defined
as ``any substance that is a pesticide within the meaning of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), including
all active and inert ingredients of such pesticide.'' (21 U.S.C.
321(q)(1)).
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Endocrine disruptors, Screening assays,
Weight-of-evidence.
Dated: October 27, 2010.
Stephen A. Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-27897 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P