Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge, Washington and Yamhill Counties, OR, 67763-67765 [2010-27720]
Download as PDF
67763
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Notices
Number of annual
responses
Activity
Completion time per
response (hours)
Total annual burden hours
Onsite Monitoring and Observation Reports .....................................................
Final Monitoring Report .....................................................................................
300
25
1.5
10
450
250
TOTALS ......................................................................................................
352
..................................
1,500
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
1
Occurs once every 5 years.
Abstract: This revised information
collection combines requirements
associated with specified marine
mammal activities in the Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas. The Office of
Management and Budget approved the
information collection requirements
associated with oil and gas exploration
activities in the Chukchi Sea and
assigned OMB Control No. 1018–0139,
which expires June 30, 2011. If OMB
approves this combined request, we will
discontinue OMB Control No. 1018–
0139.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) imposed, with certain
exceptions, a moratorium on the taking
of marine mammals. Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA directs the
Secretary of the Interior to allow, upon
request by citizens of the United States,
the taking of small numbers of marine
mammals incidental to specified
activities (other than commercial
fishing) if the Secretary makes certain
findings and prescribes specific
regulations that, among other things,
establish permissible methods of taking.
Applicants seeking to conduct
activities must request a Letter of
Authorization (LOA) for the specific
activity and submit onsite monitoring
reports and a final report of the activity
to the Secretary. This is a nonform
collection. Regulations at 50 CFR 18.27
outline the procedures and
requirements for submitting a request.
Specific regulations governing
authorized activities in the Beaufort Sea
are in 50 CFR 18, subpart J. Regulations
governing authorized activities in the
Chukchi Sea are in 50 CFR 18, subpart
I. These regulations provide the
applicant with a detailed description of
information that we need to evaluate the
proposed activity and determine
whether or not to issue specific
regulations and, subsequently, LOAs.
We use the information to verify the
finding required to issue incidental take
regulations, to decide if we should issue
an LOA, and, if issued, what conditions
should be in the LOA. In addition, we
will analyze the information to
determine impacts to the marine
mammals and the availability of those
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 02, 2010
Jkt 223001
marine mammals for subsistence
purposes of Alaska Natives.
Comments: On July 20, 2010, we
published in the Federal Register (75
FR 42118) a notice of our intent to
request that OMB approve this
information collection. In that notice,
we solicited comments for 60 days,
ending on September 20, 2010. We
received one comment. The commenter
expressed opposition to authorization of
activities for the oil and gas industry.
We note the concerns raised by this
individual; however, we do not grant
authorization for industry activities.
Instead, we are required under Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA to take
certain actions with regard to the
‘‘incidental taking’’ of marine mammals
that may result from specified activities.
The regulations at 50 CFR 18.27(c)
define incidental, but not intentional,
taking as ‘‘takings which are infrequent,
unavoidable, or accidental. It does not
mean that the taking must be
unexpected.’’ The commenter did not
address the information collection
requirements, and we did not make any
changes to our information collection.
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–27694 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2010–N187; 1265–0000–10137
S3]
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge,
Washington and Yamhill Counties, OR
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan (CCP) for Tualatin River National
Wildlife Refuge (refuge) in Sherwood,
Oregon. We will also prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) to
evaluate the potential effects of various
CCP alternatives. We provide this notice
in compliance with our CCP policy to
advise other Federal and State agencies,
Tribes, and the public of our intentions
and to obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to
consider during the CCP planning
process.
SUMMARY:
To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by January
10, 2011. We will announce
opportunities for public input in local
news media, through mailings of
planning updates, and by postings on
the refuge’s Web site throughout the
CCP planning process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: TualatinCCP@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Tualatin River CCP/EA’’ in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Project Leader, (503) 625–
5947.
U.S. Mail: Attn: Project Leader,
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
67764
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Notices
19255 SW Pacific Highway, Sherwood,
OR 97140.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off
comments during regular business hours
(8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) at 19255 SW Pacific
Highway, Sherwood, OR 97140.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ralph Webber, Project Leader, (503)
625–5944.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate our
process for developing a CCP for the
Tualatin River Refuge. This notice
complies with our CCP policy to (1)
advise the public, other Federal and
State agencies, Tribes, and other
organizations of our intention to
conduct comprehensive conservation
planning for this refuge, and (2) obtain
suggestions and information on the
scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife
Refuge System was established for
specific purposes. These purposes are
the foundation for developing and
prioritizing the conservation and
management goals and objectives for
each refuge within the National Wildlife
Refuge System mission, and
determining compatible public uses of a
refuge. The planning process is a way
for us and the public to evaluate
management goals and objectives that
will insure the best possible approach to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 02, 2010
Jkt 223001
wildlife, plant, and habitat
conservation, while providing for
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities that are compatible with
the refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System.
Our CCP process provides
participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies;
organizations; and the public. At this
time we encourage input in the form of
issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions
for the future management of Tualatin
River Refuge.
We will conduct an environmental
review of this project and prepare an EA
in accordance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.); NEPA regulations (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508); other appropriate
Federal laws and regulations; and our
policies and procedures for compliance
with those laws and regulations.
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge
Established in 1992 under guidelines
of the Service’s Urban Refuge Policy,
Tualatin River Refuge is one of a
handful of urban refuges in the country.
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge
and the satellite Wapato Lake Unit are
both located within the midsection of
the Tualatin River basin at the northern
portion of the Willamette Valley in
Washington and Yamhill Counties,
Oregon. The refuge preserves a wetland
ecosystem and provides a wildlife
center in the shadow of Oregon’s largest
metropolitan area, Portland. The
overarching refuge purpose of
establishment cited in the Land
Protection Plan (1992) is to ‘‘protect,
enhance, and manage upland, wetland,
and riparian habitats for a variety of
migratory birds and resident fish and
wildlife, as well as for the enjoyment of
people.’’
The satellite Wapato Lake Unit was
established in 2007. The Wapato Lake
Unit serves a similar refuge purpose for
establishment and supports many of the
same types of habitats found within core
management units at Tualatin River
Refuge. However, there is a greater
emphasis on maintaining and enhancing
biological diversity as well as providing
habitats for migratory waterfowl, with a
special emphasis placed on wintering
tundra swan populations. The approved
refuge acquisition boundary consists of
7,370 acres of primarily floodplain
habitats, of which 4,310 acres make up
the Wapato Lake Unit.
The refuge manages landscapes made
up of predominately flat bottomland
bordered by uplands. Habitats consist of
rivers and streams; seasonal, scrub-
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shrub, and forested wetlands; riparian
forests; wet and dry meadows; oak and
pine savanna; and mixed forested
uplands. The refuge is home to nearly
200 species of birds; more than 50
species of mammals; 25 species of
reptiles and amphibians; and a wide
variety of insects, fish, and plants. The
refuge opened to the public in 2006, and
now nearly 100,000 annual visitors
come to the refuge and participate in
wildlife-dependent activities such as
environmental education, resource
interpretation, wildlife observation, and
wildlife photography.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns,
and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary
issues, concerns, and opportunities that
may warrant consideration in the CCP.
The following questions are presented
to help express the types of matters
under consideration. The public scoping
process may identify additional issues.
Habitat Management and Restoration:
What actions should the Service take to
sustain and restore priority species and
habitats over the next 15 years? What
abiotic and biologic data is needed to
accomplish these actions? How much
should the refuge rely on existing
periods of flooding to manage
floodplain habitats where natural
hydrology and landscape conditions
have been altered by manmade
influences? Should fire be used to
maintain relic habitats as part of the
management of imperiled landscapes
and recovery of listed and/or rare
species occupying these sites? What
other management efforts should be
considered to expand control of exotic
species such as carp, bull frogs, nutria,
and other feral animals? How should the
Service manage external threats to the
refuge, such as urban development,
stormwater runoff, and wildlife
disturbance? How are species, such as
mosquitoes or browsing Canada geese,
affecting property or people beyond the
refuge boundaries? Should the refuge
use cooperative farming as an interimonly form of management, or should it
also be considered a long-term
management strategy for managing
waterfowl populations?
Public Use and Access: What type and
level of recreation opportunities should
be provided? When refuge access points
and uses are developed, are they
adequate and appropriate? Do current
public-use programs have an
unacceptable level of impact on refuge
wildlife and habitat resources? Which
areas of the refuge should be managed
as undisturbed sanctuary areas and
which areas should be open to public
use?
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 3, 2010 / Notices
Invasive Species Control: How do
invasive species affect functioning
native systems, and what actions should
be taken to reduce the incidence and
spread of invasive species, especially in
a future of climate change?
Wapato Lake: What interim actions
should the refuge take to minimize
impacts to water quality of the Tualatin
River? Can natural hydrology options be
employed for restoring the lakebed
without compromising water quality to
riverine systems and down stream
users? How should the refuge approach
landscape-level restoration activities to
enhance listed salmonid and other
native fish habitat, particularly in regard
to Wapato Lake? By what set of criteria
and which means should the refuge
consider active management strategies
to control elk populations residing on
the refuge?
Public Meetings
We will give the public opportunities
to provide input at public open houses
and informational meetings, and by
submitting written comments. We will
distribute mailings, news releases, and
announcements when we have
confirmed dates for the public open
houses, meetings, and other public
involvement opportunities.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010–27720 Filed 11–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[FWS–R2–ES–2010–N221; 20124–1113–
0000–F5]
Endangered and Threatened Species
Permit Applications
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications;
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 02, 2010
Jkt 223001
The following applicants have
applied for scientific research permits,
or the Fish and Wildlife Service is
amending their existing permit, to
conduct certain activities with
endangered species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The Act requires that we
invite public comment on these permit
applications.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
December 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to the Chief, Endangered
Species Division, Ecological Services,
P.O. Box 1306, Room 6034,
Albuquerque, NM 87103. Documents
and other information submitted with
these applications are available for
review, subject to the requirements of
the Privacy Act and Freedom of
Information Act. Documents will be
available for public inspection, by
appointment only, during normal
business hours at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 500 Gold Ave. SW.,
Room 6034, Albuquerque, NM 87102.
Please refer to the respective permit
number for each application when
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Endangered
Species Division, P.O. Box 1306,
Albuquerque, NM 87103; (505) 248–
6920.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Permit TE–24623A
Applicant: Miller Park Zoo,
Bloomington, Illinois.
Applicant requests a new permit for
research and recovery purposes to hold
Mount Graham red squirrels
(Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis)
in captivity. The applicant’s intended
purpose is breeding, including (but not
limited to) husbandry, maintenance,
and transportation, at the Miller Park
Zoo.
Permit TE–24625A
Applicant: Wendy Leonard, San
Antonio, Texas.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67765
Applicant requests a new permit for
research and recovery purposes to
conduct presence/absence surveys for
golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica
chrysoparia) and black-capped vireo
(Vireo atricapilla) within Texas.
Permit TE–088197
Applicant: High Mesa Research, Valdez,
New Mexico.
Applicant requests an amendment to
a current permit for research and
recovery purposes to conduct presence/
absence surveys for southwestern
willow flycatcher (Empidonax trailii
extimus) within Arizona, California,
Colorado, Utah, and Nevada.
Permit TE–821577
Permittee: Arizona Game and Fish
Department, Phoenix, Arizona.
The Service is amending Arizona
Game and Fish Department’s current
permit for research and recovery
purposes for the range of activities they
undertake, including, but not limited to
presence/absence surveys, research, and
reestablishment of the following species
within Arizona and adjacent portions of
California, Nevada, Utah, and New
Mexico: Kanab ambersnail (Oxyloma
haydeni kanabensis), Mexican longnosed bat (Leptonycteris nivalis),
masked bobwhite (Colinus virginianus
ridgwayi), bonytail chub (Gila elegans),
Gila chub (Gila intermedia), humpback
chub (Gila cypha), Colorado
pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius),
Quitobaquito pupfish (Cyprinodon
eremus), Virgin River chub (Gila
seminuda), woundfin (Plagopterus
argentissimus),Yaqui chub (Gila
purpurea), Yaqui topminnow
(Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonoriensis),
California condor (Gymnogyps
californianus), thick-billed parrot
(Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha), blackfooted ferret (Mustela nigripes),
southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus), jaguar
(Pathera onca), ocelot (Leopardus
pardalis), desert pupfish (Cyprinodon
macularius), Sonoran tiger salamander
(Ambystoma tigrinum stebbinsi), Mount
Graham red squirrel (Tamiasciurus
hudsonicus grahamensis), razorback
sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), Gila
topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis),
and Hualapai Mexican vole (Microtus
mexicanus hualpaiensis).
Permit TE–25446A
Applicant: Gerald Monks, Flagstaff,
Arizona.
Applicant requests a new permit for
research and recovery purposes to
conduct presence/absence surveys for
southwestern willow flycatcher
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67763-67765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27720]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2010-N187; 1265-0000-10137 S3]
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge, Washington and Yamhill
Counties, OR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for Tualatin River
National Wildlife Refuge (refuge) in Sherwood, Oregon. We will also
prepare an environmental assessment (EA) to evaluate the potential
effects of various CCP alternatives. We provide this notice in
compliance with our CCP policy to advise other Federal and State
agencies, Tribes, and the public of our intentions and to obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider during
the CCP planning process.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
January 10, 2011. We will announce opportunities for public input in
local news media, through mailings of planning updates, and by postings
on the refuge's Web site throughout the CCP planning process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: TualatinCCP@fws.gov. Include ``Tualatin River CCP/EA'' in
the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Project Leader, (503) 625-5947.
U.S. Mail: Attn: Project Leader, Tualatin River National Wildlife
Refuge,
[[Page 67764]]
19255 SW Pacific Highway, Sherwood, OR 97140.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments during regular
business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) at 19255 SW Pacific Highway,
Sherwood, OR 97140.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph Webber, Project Leader, (503)
625-5944.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we initiate our process for developing a CCP for
the Tualatin River Refuge. This notice complies with our CCP policy to
(1) advise the public, other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and
other organizations of our intention to conduct comprehensive
conservation planning for this refuge, and (2) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to consider in the environmental
document and during development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Refuge Administration Act.
Each unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System was established
for specific purposes. These purposes are the foundation for developing
and prioritizing the conservation and management goals and objectives
for each refuge within the National Wildlife Refuge System mission, and
determining compatible public uses of a refuge. The planning process is
a way for us and the public to evaluate management goals and objectives
that will insure the best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and
habitat conservation, while providing for wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities that are compatible with the refuge's
establishing purposes and the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public.
At this time we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns, ideas,
and suggestions for the future management of Tualatin River Refuge.
We will conduct an environmental review of this project and prepare
an EA in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); NEPA
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); other appropriate Federal laws
and regulations; and our policies and procedures for compliance with
those laws and regulations.
Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge
Established in 1992 under guidelines of the Service's Urban Refuge
Policy, Tualatin River Refuge is one of a handful of urban refuges in
the country. Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge and the satellite
Wapato Lake Unit are both located within the midsection of the Tualatin
River basin at the northern portion of the Willamette Valley in
Washington and Yamhill Counties, Oregon. The refuge preserves a wetland
ecosystem and provides a wildlife center in the shadow of Oregon's
largest metropolitan area, Portland. The overarching refuge purpose of
establishment cited in the Land Protection Plan (1992) is to ``protect,
enhance, and manage upland, wetland, and riparian habitats for a
variety of migratory birds and resident fish and wildlife, as well as
for the enjoyment of people.''
The satellite Wapato Lake Unit was established in 2007. The Wapato
Lake Unit serves a similar refuge purpose for establishment and
supports many of the same types of habitats found within core
management units at Tualatin River Refuge. However, there is a greater
emphasis on maintaining and enhancing biological diversity as well as
providing habitats for migratory waterfowl, with a special emphasis
placed on wintering tundra swan populations. The approved refuge
acquisition boundary consists of 7,370 acres of primarily floodplain
habitats, of which 4,310 acres make up the Wapato Lake Unit.
The refuge manages landscapes made up of predominately flat
bottomland bordered by uplands. Habitats consist of rivers and streams;
seasonal, scrub-shrub, and forested wetlands; riparian forests; wet and
dry meadows; oak and pine savanna; and mixed forested uplands. The
refuge is home to nearly 200 species of birds; more than 50 species of
mammals; 25 species of reptiles and amphibians; and a wide variety of
insects, fish, and plants. The refuge opened to the public in 2006, and
now nearly 100,000 annual visitors come to the refuge and participate
in wildlife-dependent activities such as environmental education,
resource interpretation, wildlife observation, and wildlife
photography.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities
that may warrant consideration in the CCP. The following questions are
presented to help express the types of matters under consideration. The
public scoping process may identify additional issues.
Habitat Management and Restoration: What actions should the Service
take to sustain and restore priority species and habitats over the next
15 years? What abiotic and biologic data is needed to accomplish these
actions? How much should the refuge rely on existing periods of
flooding to manage floodplain habitats where natural hydrology and
landscape conditions have been altered by manmade influences? Should
fire be used to maintain relic habitats as part of the management of
imperiled landscapes and recovery of listed and/or rare species
occupying these sites? What other management efforts should be
considered to expand control of exotic species such as carp, bull
frogs, nutria, and other feral animals? How should the Service manage
external threats to the refuge, such as urban development, stormwater
runoff, and wildlife disturbance? How are species, such as mosquitoes
or browsing Canada geese, affecting property or people beyond the
refuge boundaries? Should the refuge use cooperative farming as an
interim-only form of management, or should it also be considered a
long-term management strategy for managing waterfowl populations?
Public Use and Access: What type and level of recreation
opportunities should be provided? When refuge access points and uses
are developed, are they adequate and appropriate? Do current public-use
programs have an unacceptable level of impact on refuge wildlife and
habitat resources? Which areas of the refuge should be managed as
undisturbed sanctuary areas and which areas should be open to public
use?
[[Page 67765]]
Invasive Species Control: How do invasive species affect
functioning native systems, and what actions should be taken to reduce
the incidence and spread of invasive species, especially in a future of
climate change?
Wapato Lake: What interim actions should the refuge take to
minimize impacts to water quality of the Tualatin River? Can natural
hydrology options be employed for restoring the lakebed without
compromising water quality to riverine systems and down stream users?
How should the refuge approach landscape-level restoration activities
to enhance listed salmonid and other native fish habitat, particularly
in regard to Wapato Lake? By what set of criteria and which means
should the refuge consider active management strategies to control elk
populations residing on the refuge?
Public Meetings
We will give the public opportunities to provide input at public
open houses and informational meetings, and by submitting written
comments. We will distribute mailings, news releases, and announcements
when we have confirmed dates for the public open houses, meetings, and
other public involvement opportunities.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: October 28, 2010.
Theresa E. Rabot,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010-27720 Filed 11-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P