Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: FY 2012 Fulbright Scholar Program, 66413-66419 [2010-27301]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66413-66419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7214]


Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for 
Grant Proposals: FY 2012 Fulbright Scholar Program

    Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
    Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E-12-01.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.401.
    Key Dates:
    Application Deadline: February 18, 2011.
    Executive Summary: The Office of Academic Programs, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), U.S. Department of State 
announces an open competition for a cooperative agreement to assist in 
the FY 2012 administration of the worldwide Fulbright Scholar Program. 
The Fulbright Scholar Program is a major component of the overall 
Fulbright Program, which also includes the Fulbright Student Program.
    For more than 60 years, the Fulbright Scholar Program has offered 
awards for college and university faculty, as well as for non-academic 
professionals (such as lawyers, artists, and journalists) and 
independent scholars, to lecture and conduct research abroad. Tens of 
thousands of U.S. and non-U.S. scholars and professionals have 
participated in these exchanges since the Fulbright Program's inception 
in 1946.
    The Fulbright Scholar Program currently sends approximately 1,300 
qualified U.S. scholars and professionals abroad to lecture, conduct 
research, and provide academic consulting at overseas institutions for 
long- and short-term programs. Conversely, the program brings 
approximately 900 visiting (non-U.S.) participants from approximately 
150 countries to the United States for similar activities.
    Responsibility for the management of the Fulbright Scholar Program 
is shared between the U.S. Department of State in Washington, DC, fifty 
bilateral Fulbright commissions, approximately 100 U.S. embassies 
overseas, and a private sector, cooperating agency in the United 
States. Overall policy guidelines for the Fulbright Scholar Program are 
determined by the Presidentially appointed J. William Fulbright Foreign 
Scholarship Board (FSB).
    The organization that is awarded the cooperative agreement under 
this competition will be responsible for recruitment, selection, 
placement, facilitation of enrichment activities for

[[Page 66414]]

participants, program promotion, disbursement of funds, and 
recordkeeping for both the U.S. and Visiting Fulbright Scholar 
Programs. This work will be supervised by the Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs of the Department of State.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

Authority

    Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the 
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of 
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase 
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the 
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us 
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural 
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United 
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of 
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States 
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the 
program above is provided through legislation. The Fulbright Program 
also receives significant annual funding and other support from partner 
governments and private donors worldwide.
    The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, as sponsor and 
manager of the Fulbright Scholar Program, plays a significant role in 
the planning and implementation of all program initiatives, publicity, 
promotion, and enrichment activities, as well as liaison with overseas 
field partners. The Bureau will work closely with the recipient 
organization on participant selection procedures, development of 
selection panels, and stipend and benefit issues. Regular ongoing 
contacts with Bureau managers will be required throughout the program 
year. Through this Request for Grant Proposals (RFGP), the Department 
seeks new ideas to develop effective responses to changing recruitment 
conditions, to improve the outreach of the program in the U.S. and 
overseas, and to introduce new models for scholarly exchange.

Purpose

    The Department of State will provide funding to the successful 
applicant organization to assist in the administration of both the U.S. 
and Visiting Fulbright Scholar Program.
    The Fulbright Program was created by the U.S. Congress at the end 
of the World War II to provide the opportunity for future leaders to 
observe and better comprehend the political, economic, and cultural 
institutions and societies of other countries and people. In the 
intervening years, the Fulbright Program has evolved into the premier 
educational exchange program sponsored by the people of the United 
States through their federal government, and an important element in 
the conduct of U.S. foreign affairs. The Fulbright Program, which now 
extends to more than 150 foreign countries and involves approximately 
8,000 participants per year, has helped to form and inform tens of 
thousands of the world's leaders in every academic and professional 
field.
    The Scholar portion of the Fulbright Program will engage 
approximately 2,400 scholars and professionals in FY 2012.
    The hallmark of the Fulbright Program is binationalism. The United 
States Government and foreign governments, educational institutions and 
other public and private entities are all partners in this enterprise. 
In many countries of the world, financial contributions from 
governments or public/private sources match or exceed those of the 
United States. Because of its binational nature, the profile of the 
Fulbright Program worldwide reflects a range of objectives and 
interests.
    Under the auspices of the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship 
Board, approximately 800 U.S. citizens are awarded one or two semester 
Fulbright Scholar grants each year through a merit-based, competitive 
process, to teach undergraduate or graduate courses at host 
universities overseas, collaborate with foreign colleagues on projects, 
pursue individual research, conduct seminars, consult with foreign 
government ministries and educational institutions, advise on 
curriculum development and guest lecture at foreign universities other 
than their host institutions.
    All grant opportunities are determined overseas by binational 
Fulbright commissions and U.S. embassies in coordination with the 
Department of State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs in 
Washington, DC. The cooperative organization administering the 
Fulbright Scholar Program is responsible for advertising and recruiting 
applicants in the U.S. and for managing an academic peer review process 
to recommend candidates for participation in the program.
    Similarly, approximately 900 foreign scholars and professionals 
receive grants each year for research, teaching, guest lecturing and 
academic consulting in the United States. These participants are chosen 
through open, merit-based competitions in each country, which are 
conducted by a bilateral Fulbright commission or, in the absence of a 
commission, by a U.S. embassy.
    Additionally, the Fulbright Scholar Program offers a range of 
activities in response to changing conditions and requirements within 
the U.S. academic community and varying circumstances and emerging 
needs in overseas academic environments. The cooperating organization 
should be prepared to offer expertise, intellectual input and creative 
thinking on current research, pedagogical, administrative, 
institutional, and other academic issues and concerns to promote the 
relevance, quality and effectiveness of the Fulbright Scholar Program 
in the U.S. and abroad. The cooperating organization should be prepared 
to advise the Bureau on international higher education policy issues 
that are addressed by the Bureau in Fulbright and other contexts.
    While maintaining its core long-term activities, the program now 
includes shorter-term grant opportunities for both U.S. and foreign 
scholars, new opportunities for collaborative research and support for 
follow-on activities to build lasting links between U.S. and foreign 
academic institutions. These initiatives have made the Scholar program 
more responsive to academic environments and more relevant in 
supporting long-term U.S. national interests as well as world-wide 
concerns. The Department continues to seek new program models that 
respond to changing circumstances in the U.S. and overseas. The 
cooperating organization will need to demonstrate flexibility to 
respond quickly to changing priorities and global circumstances when 
administering and developing programs.
    The Fulbright Specialist Program provides short-term (two to six 
weeks) opportunities for up to 500 U.S. academic specialists annually 
to work with overseas, post-secondary institutions on projects ranging 
from lecturing and participation in teaching seminars to collaboration 
on curriculum and course design.
    Through the Scholar-in-Residence component of the Fulbright 
program, the Bureau brings foreign scholars and professionals for an 
academic semester or academic year to U.S. campuses that do not often 
house foreign scholars. These campuses are selected through a 
competition managed by the cooperating agency.
    The Bureau sponsors collaborative research through the global New 
Century Scholars Program and

[[Page 66415]]

comparable regional research programs, involving approximately 30 U.S. 
and foreign scholars working in thematically based cohorts for 
approximately one year.
    These programs require close collaboration between the Bureau, the 
cooperating agency in the U.S., Fulbright commissions and U.S. 
embassies overseas. Based on this program's direct relevance to current 
world issues, the cooperating organization is expected to provide 
expertise on how academic research collaboration can most effectively 
address international policy issues and encourage academic and other 
private sector involvement and support to supplement government funds.
    The cooperating agency will also be responsible for other special 
projects as directed by the Office of Academic Exchange Programs, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of Department of State, 
including seminars for Community College and International Education 
Administrators, and other professional development opportunities for 
groups of scholars from selected countries.
    The Bureau welcomes proposals from applicant organizations 
proposing additional new scholarly exchange activities consistent with 
Fulbright principles that are relevant to changing circumstances in the 
global academic community.
    In FY 2012, the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs will 
continue to seek to strengthen exchanges in parts of the world which 
have been under-represented in academic exchange programs. The Bureau 
seeks innovative recruitment approaches and creative strategies to 
attract U.S. Scholars to these regions.
    In a cooperative agreement, ECA/A/E is substantially involved in 
program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA activities 
and responsibilities for this program are as follows:
     Participating in the design and direction of program 
activities;
     Approving of key personnel;
     Approving and providing input on program timelines, 
agendas and administrative procedures;
     Providing guidance in execution of all program components;
     Reviewing and approving all program publicity and 
recruitment materials;
     Providing approval of participating scholars, in 
cooperation with Fulbright commissions and U.S. embassies, subject to 
final selection by the Fulbright Board;
     Providing approval of changes to scholars proposed field, 
program, or institution;
     Providing approval of decisions related to special 
circumstances or problems throughout the duration of program;
     Assisting with non-immigration status and other SEVIS-
related issues;
     Assisting with participant emergencies;
     Providing liaison with relevant U.S. embassies,
     Fulbright commissions and country desk officers at the 
State Department.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in 
this program is listed under number I above.
    Fiscal Year Funds: 2012.
    Approximate Total Funding: $7,800,000.
    Approximate Number of Awards: One.
    Approximate Average Award: $7,800,000.
    Floor of Award Range: $7,800,000.
    Ceiling of Award Range: $7,800,000.
    Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, October 1, 
2011.
    Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 30, 2015.
    Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this 
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is 
ECA's intent to renew this cooperative agreement for at least four 
additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again.

III. Eligibility Information

III.1. Eligible applicants

    Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit 
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code 
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).

III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds

    There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this 
competition.
    However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels 
of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
    When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the 
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its 
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may 
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For 
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs 
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by 
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis 
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in 
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost 
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum 
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's 
contribution will be reduced in like proportion. The successful 
recipient organization will be expected to continue to provide cost-
sharing in future renewal applications at levels comparable to those 
provided in the initial competition.

III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements

    (a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less 
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be 
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award, 
in an amount up to $7,800,000 to support program and administrative 
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore, 
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting 
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. 
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost 
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
    (b.) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the 
technical eligibility requirements specified in the Proposal Submission 
Instructions (PSI) and the Project Objectives, Goals, and 
Implementation (POGI) document. Failure to do so will result in your 
proposal being declared technically ineligible and given no further 
consideration in the review process.

IV. Application and Submission Information

    Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending 
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has 
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with 
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.

IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package

    Please contact the Office of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E, 
SA-5, 4th Floor, U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037, telephone (202) 632-3233, fax (202) 632-6490 to 
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding

[[Page 66416]]

Opportunity Number ECA/A/E-12-01 when making your request.
    Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained 
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
    The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission 
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application 
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
    It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation 
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria 
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
    Please specify Ms. Michelle Johnson and refer to the Funding 
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E-12-01 on all other inquiries and 
correspondence.

IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet

    The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's 
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the 
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
    Please read all information before downloading.

IV.3. Content and Form of Submission

    Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation 
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under 
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section 
below.
    IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative 
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit 
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. 
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a 
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the 
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application 
package.
    IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal 
narrative and budget.
    Please refer to the solicitation package. It contains the mandatory 
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project 
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional 
formatting and technical requirements.
    IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of 
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for 
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the 
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers, 
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In 
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one 
of the following ways:
    (1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of 
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant 
portions of this form.
    (2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information 
above in the format of their choice.
    In addition to final program reporting requirements, award 
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived 
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant 
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior 
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as 
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by 
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by 
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and 
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and 
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting 
requirements.
    If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received 
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or 
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the 
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify 
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will 
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
    IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information 
when preparing your proposal narrative:
    IV.3d.1 Adherence to all regulations governing the J visa. The 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important 
emphases on the security and proper administration of the Exchange 
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by award recipients and 
sponsors to all regulations governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals 
should demonstrate the applicant's capacity to meet all requirements 
governing the administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set 
forth in 22 CFR part 62, including the oversight of Responsible 
Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of 
program participants, provision of pre-arrival information and 
orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper 
maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other 
requirements.
    The award recipient will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms 
to participants in this program.
    A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of 
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, Private Sector 
Programs Division, U.S. Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA-5, 5th 
Floor, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
    IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to 
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the 
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. 
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass 
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender, 
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities. 
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this 
principle both in program administration and in program content.
    Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support for 
Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity 
into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out 
programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people 
do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take 
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such 
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.'' 
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries 
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection 
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their 
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
    IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include 
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the 
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends 
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other 
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes 
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient 
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond 
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, 
learning as a result of the program,

[[Page 66417]]

changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the 
program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or 
partner institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators 
that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive 
knowledge.
    Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting 
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation 
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your 
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure 
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are 
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and 
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct 
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link 
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
    Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish 
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services 
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important 
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot 
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the 
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people 
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast, 
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is 
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and 
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
    We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, 
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in 
increasing order of importance):
    1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange 
experience.
    2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, 
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both 
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
    3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in 
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic 
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new 
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community 
members, and others.
    4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and 
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational 
improvements.

    Please note:  Consideration should be given to the appropriate 
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example, 
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas 
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.


    Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be 
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear 
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when 
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear 
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., 
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation 
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] 
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
    Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports 
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular 
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and 
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years 
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
    IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e. sustainability, overall 
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any 
other requirements etc.
    IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration 
when preparing your budget:
    IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the 
entire program. Depending on the availability of funds, up to 
$7,800,000 in U.S. Government funding will be available to support the 
administration of the Fulbright Scholar Program worldwide in FY 2012. 
In addition, a program budget totaling approximately $45,000,000 for 
the global Fulbright Scholar Program will be transferred to the 
recipient organization at regular intervals to cover individual 
participant costs. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns 
reflecting administrative budget categories.
    IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
    (1) staff salaries and benefits;
    (2) rent, furniture, and equipment;
    (3) travel;
    (4) communications, printing, and publishing;
    (5) and other fees associated with the normal administration of 
exchange programs.
    Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget 
guidelines and formatting instructions.
    IV.3f. APPLICATION DEADLINE AND METHODS OF SUBMISSION:
    Application Deadline Date: February 18, 2011
    Reference Number: ECA/A/E-12-01
    Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two 
ways:
    (1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery 
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
    (2.) Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), 
or
    (3.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
    Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above 
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory 
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
    IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be 
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by 
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and 
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery 
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and 
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline 
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be 
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals 
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for 
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon 
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure 
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to 
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal 
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for 
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. 
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.


    Important note:  When preparing your submission please make sure 
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it 
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.


    The original and 8 copies of the application should be sent to: 
Program Management Division ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/A/E-12-01, SA-5, 
Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the 
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov

[[Page 66418]]

(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available 
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.

    Please Note:  ECA bears no responsibility for applicant 
timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from transmission 
or conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.


    Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started' 
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
    Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could 
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate 
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP 
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
    Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an 
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the 
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In 
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can 
take up to two business days.
    Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the 
application deadline to begin the submission process through 
Grants.gov.
    The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all 
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive 
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For 
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all 
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in 
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA 
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or 
conversion processes.
    Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and 
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
    Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726,
    Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time,
    E-mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
    Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of 
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been 
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above 
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the 
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the 
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
    Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various 
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission 
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a 
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an 
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via 
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly 
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the 
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon 
receipt of electronic applications.
    It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via 
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received 
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for 
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
    Optional--IV.3f.3 You may also state here any limitations on the 
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear 
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual 
program director or both.
    IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order 
12372 does not apply to this program.

V. Application Review Information

V.1. Review Process

    The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. 
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the 
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible 
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public 
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will 
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and 
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. 
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by 
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the 
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for 
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for 
assistance awards (cooperative agreements) resides with the Bureau's 
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
    Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed 
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank 
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
    1. Program planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should 
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda 
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described 
above.
    2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be 
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly 
demonstrate how the applicant will meet the program's objectives and 
plans, while demonstrating innovation and a commitment to academic 
excellence. Proposals should demonstrate a capacity for flexibility in 
the management of the program.
    3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate the 
recipient's commitment to promoting the awareness and understanding of 
diversity.
    4. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional 
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve Fulbright 
Scholar Program goals in all respects. Applicants should demonstrate 
well-established links to the scholarly and professional community in 
the U.S. and knowledge of other educational environments as they apply 
to academic and professional exchange programs.
    5. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an 
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including 
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting 
requirements for past Bureau awards (grants or cooperative agreements) 
as determined by the Bureau's Office of Contracts. The Bureau will 
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated 
potential of new applicants.
    6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate 
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of 
the program. The Bureau recommends that the proposal include a draft 
survey questionnaire or other technique plus description of a 
methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. 
Award-receiving organizations/institutions will be expected to submit 
intermediate reports after each project component is concluded or 
quarterly, whichever is less frequent.
    7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and 
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and 
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be 
necessary and appropriate. The proposal should maximize cost-sharing 
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct 
funding contributions.

[[Page 66419]]

VI. Award Administration Information

VI.1a. Award Notices

    Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by 
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. 
Successful applicants will receive an Federal Assistance Award (FAA) 
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with 
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding 
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The 
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the 
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
    Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of 
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this 
competition.
    All awards made under this competition must be executed according 
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the 
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations 
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into 
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or 
institutions.

    Note:  To assure that planning for the inclusion of the 
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact 
Donna Ives, Branch Chief for Middle East Programs, 202-632-6050 for 
additional information.

VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements 
include the following:

Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for 
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for 
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian 
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements 
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, 
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
    Please reference the following Web sites for additional 
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.

VI.3. Reporting Requirements

    You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the 
following reports:
    A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the 
expiration of the award;
    (1.) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program 
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This 
one-page report will will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available 
to the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's 
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting 
requirements.
    (2.) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all 
program reports.
    (3.) Additional reporting requirements as outlined in the POGI 
document.
    Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing 
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program 
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions 
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
    All data collected, including survey responses and contact 
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and 
provided to the Bureau upon request.
    All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program 
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.

VII. Agency Contacts

    For questions about this announcement, contact: Michelle Johnson, 
U.S. Department of State, Office of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/
E, SA-5, 4th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, tel. 
(202) 632-3233 and fax (202) 632-6490, JohnsonML3@state.gov.
    All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should 
reference the above title and number ECA/A/E-12-01.
    Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or 
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff 
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal 
review process has been completed.

VIII. Other Information

Notice

    The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may 
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information 
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be 
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment 
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, 
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of 
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject 
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 
above.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-27301 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P