Vessel Traffic Service Lower Mississippi River, 66309-66315 [2010-27235]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
The contractor, Agate Construction on
behalf of NJDOT, has requested a
temporary deviation to the existing
regulations for the Route 88/Veterans
Memorial Bridge to facilitate necessary
repairs. The repairs consist of the
replacement of bridge traffic control
devices (barrier gates, warning gates,
and bridge traffic control signals) along
with major electrical rehabilitation.
Under this deviation, the vertical-lift
span of the drawbridge will be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation
position from 7 a.m. on December 15,
2010, through 11:59 p.m. on March 15,
2011.
Bridge opening data, supplied by
NJDOT and reviewed by the Coast
Guard, revealed a small amount of
vessel openings of the draw span
between the months of December and
March in 2008 and 2009. Specifically,
the bridge opened for vessels 15, 0, 0,
and 4 times during the months of
December 2008 to March 2009; and
during the months of December 2009 to
March 2010, the bridge opened for
vessels 14, 0, 0, and 8 times,
respectively.
The Coast Guard will inform the users
of the waterway through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
closure period so that vessels can
arrange their transits to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary
deviation.
Vessels that can pass under the bridge
without a bridge opening may continue
to do so at anytime. The Atlantic Ocean
is an alternate route for vessels with
mast heights greater than 10 feet. In the
event of an emergency, the drawbridge
will open for vessels if at least 24 hours’
advance notice is given to the bridge
operator.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulation
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Dated: October 14, 2010.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–27237 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 161 and 165
[Docket No. USCG–1998–4399]
RIN 1625–AA58
Vessel Traffic Service Lower
Mississippi River
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a Vessel Traffic Service
(VTS) on the Lower Mississippi River
and is transferring certain vessel traffic
management (VTM) provisions of the
Mississippi River, Louisiana—Regulated
Navigation Area to the VTS. This final
rule establishes a mandatory
participation VTS by implementing
current voluntary practices and
operating procedures. This rule
facilitates vessel transits, enhances good
order, promotes safe navigation, and
improves existing waterway operating
measures. The rule also proposes minor
conforming revisions to the existing
VTM provisions and related regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–1998–4399 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–1998–4399 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Lieutenant Commander Jim
Larson, Office of Shore Forces (CG–
7413), Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–
1554, e-mail James.W.Larson@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Regulatory History
III. Basis and Purpose
IV. Background
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66309
A. Vessel Traffic Services
B. Stakeholder Involvement
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
AIS Automatic Identification System
DHS Department of Homeland
Security
LMR Lower Mississippi River
LMRWSAC Lower Mississippi River
Waterways Safety Advisory
Committee
NDG National Dialogue Group
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PAWSS Port and Waterways Safety
Systems
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
PWSSC Ports and Waterways Safety
Systems Committee
SNPRM Supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
VTC Vessel Traffic Center
VTM Vessel Traffic Management
VTS Vessel Traffic Service
II. Regulatory History
On April 26, 2000, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ‘‘Vessel
Traffic Service Lower Mississippi River’’
(65 FR 24516) and requested comments
during a 90-day comment period. Due to
several requests for additional time to
comment, on August 18, 2000, the Coast
Guard published a notice (65 FR 50479)
reopening the comment period until
December 1, 2000. The Coast Guard
received 23 letters containing three
comments in response to the NPRM.
On September 20, 2000, the Coast
Guard published a notice of public
meeting (65 FR 56843) announcing the
time and place of a public meeting. On
October 24, 2000, the Coast Guard held
the meeting in New Orleans, LA, to
receive comments on the proposed rule.
Twenty-four people attended the
meeting and two people spoke.
On November 12, 2009, the Coast
Guard published a supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
entitled ‘‘Vessel Traffic Service Lower
Mississippi River’’ (74 FR 58223). The
SNPRM addressed important changes to
maritime operations that have taken
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
66310
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
place since the NPRM was published,1
specifically: (1) The Coast Guard has
installed and operationally tested a
computer based Vessel Traffic
Management (VTM) system that utilizes
Automatic Identification System (AIS),
closed circuit television cameras
(CCTV), radar, and VHF radio
communications to monitor and advise
vessel traffic on the Lower Mississippi
River (LMR), (2) the Vessel Traffic
Service (VTS) Center is now fully
staffed by trained and certified Coast
Guard civilian employees augmented by
two onsite Pilot Advisors, (3) remote
traffic control light tower operations
have been transitioned to the VTS
Center, (4) AIS is now fully integrated
with the Coast Guard traffic
management systems throughout the
United States,2 and (5) the Coast Guard
established a voluntary participation
VTS in LMR.3 In the SNPRM, we also
addressed the comments received on the
NPRM.
We received one letter containing two
comments in response to the SNPRM,
which are discussed later in this
preamble.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
III. Basis and Purpose
This final rule is issued, pursuant to
the Ports and Waterways Safety Act
(PWSA), as amended, (codified at 33
U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), to establish VTSs in
the United States. Title I of the PWSA
authorizes the Secretary to promulgate
regulations to establish and maintain
VTSs consisting of measures for
controlling or supervising vessel traffic
to protect the marine environment. 33
U.S.C. 1223, 1231.
The Coast Guard operates 12 VTSs in
the United States. A VTS provides
navigation and safety information that
enables mariners to make informed
decisions during their voyage. In the
past, the Coast Guard operated
variations of a VTS in the New Orleans
area. Unfortunately, these efforts were
hindered by budget constraints, the
limitations of voluntary participation,
and the temporary or part-time nature of
the VTS operation; none of these proved
to be a permanent or complete solution
to the challenges of navigating the LMR.
This rule establishes mandatory
participation for certain classes of
vessels in the VTS LMR area. It amends
1 For a more complete discussion of the reasons
the Coast Guard published an SNPRM see 74 FR
58223.
2 For a more complete discussion of AIS Carriage
Requirement see the Coast Guard ‘‘Automatic
Identification System; Vessel Carriage Requirement’’
final rule published on October 22, 2003, 68 FR
60559.
3 The Coast Guard established a voluntary
participation VTS in the LMR in 2004 that has been
continuously operated since that time.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
vessel traffic measures within the
Mississippi River Regulated Navigation
Area and formalizes the existing,
voluntary VTS on the LMR.
Additionally, this rule updates certain
operating practices, adopts standard
traffic management procedures, and
informs mariners of certain services
provided by VTS LMR.
IV. Background
A. Vessel Traffic Services
Since disestablishment of the VTS in
New Orleans in the 1980s, the Coast
Guard, as directed by the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA 90, Pub. L. 101–380),
has:
(1) Validated the need for VTSs in
certain ports;
(2) Made participation mandatory in
all VTS ports established in the National
VTS regulations; and
(3) Invested in infrastructure
improvement to VTS equipment and
standardized operating procedures
across all United States VTSs.
In 1997, the Coast Guard established
the Ports and Waterways Safety System
(PAWSS) acquisition project to address
waterway users’ needs and place a
greater emphasis on partnerships with
industry to reduce risk in the marine
environment. As part of PAWSS, the
Coast Guard immediately convened a
National Dialogue Group (NDG)
comprised of maritime and waterway
community stakeholders to identify the
needs of waterway users with respect to
VTM and VTS systems. The Coast
Guard sponsored these discussions,
which were hosted by the Committee on
Maritime Advanced Information
Systems under the auspices of the
Marine Board of the National Research
Council. Those stakeholders,
representing all major sectors of the U.S.
and foreign-flagged maritime industry,
port authorities, pilots, the
environmental community, and the
Coast Guard, were tasked to: (1) Identify
the information needs of waterway users
to ensure safe passage; (2) assist in
establishing a process to identify
candidate waterways for VTM
improvements and VTS installations;
and (3) identify the basic elements of a
VTS. The goal of the NDG was to
provide a foundation for the
development of an approach to VTM
that would meet the shared government,
industry, and public objective of
ensuring the safety of vessel traffic in
U.S. ports and waterways in a
technologically sound and cost effective
way.
A federally operated and locally
adopted VTM facility has been in place
in New Orleans Harbor since the 1930s.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In an effort to assist the mariner,
safeguard the port, ensure good order,
and improve safety, the local maritime
community implemented the Algiers
Point Control Lights. This system
evolved from local river pilots standing
watch using lanterns and whistle signals
to a 24-hour, federally staffed
communication station with twin
control light towers at Governor
Nicholls Street Wharf and Gretna Lights.
Although not formally recognized as a
VTS, the Algiers Point Control Lights
have provided longstanding traffic
management services.
Vessel movement in the vicinity of
Algiers Point/Crescent area is currently
subject to regulatory provisions
established in 33 CFR 165.810(c). The
primary objective of the existing
regulatory system in 33 CFR 165.810(c)
is to provide an orderly traffic flow
around Algiers Point.
Algiers Point is one of the most
challenging bends to safely navigate on
the Mississippi River, particularly in
high water conditions. In one of the
busiest industrial harbors in the world,
vessels must negotiate a 120-degree
bend in the river amidst constantly
changing hydrographic conditions,
congested waters, and various bridges
and piers. Mandatory vessel traffic
measures, represented by the light
signals, are utilized to lessen the
potential for mishap during periods of
high water. The consequences of
improper navigation in this segment of
the river are both significant and welldocumented. Since 1991, there have
been multiple reportable marine
casualties within the area covered by
this rulemaking. The failure to safely
transit this area can quickly lead to a
mishap that causes substantial property
damage, serious environmental and
economic consequences, and even loss
of life.
The existing Control Light operation
in and around Algiers Point has proven
valuable in some measures of VTM;
however, these measures are narrow in
scope, limited to a small area, and only
operated during periods of high water.
The limited scope of the facility has
caused further problems at times:
Equipment, staffing, and location
limitations have sometimes hindered
the light operator’s ability to ensure the
overall safety and efficiency of
anticipated vessel traffic beyond the
immediate vicinity of Algiers Point.
The Coast Guard and local mariners
recognize that this segment of the
waterway warrants great vigilance. The
nature of vessel traffic within this area
and the anticipated increase in traffic
requires that certain vessel traffic
measures are active at all times or at
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
least available at a moment’s notice. The
availability of these measures can best
be assured by operating a Vessel Traffic
Center (VTC) for Algiers Point within
the framework of a VTS. A VTC is a
shoreside facility from which the VTS
operates and has the communications
capability to interact with marine traffic
and respond to developing situations.
Through implementation of a
continuously-operating VTC at Algiers
Point within the framework of the
mandatory LMR VTS being created by
this rule, the Coast Guard seeks to
overcome the limited scope of the
existing Control Light operation and use
the enhanced system capabilities of the
mandatory LMR VTS to improve
navigation safety on and around both
Algiers Point and the entire LMR.
The procedures and practices in this
rule concerning Algiers Point VTC are
essentially the same as those currently
used in the Algiers Point. This final rule
simply moves the Algiers Point
provisions from current 33 CFR
165.810(c) to new 33 CFR 161.65(c) to
integrate the Algiers Point VTC into the
VTS LMR and to consolidate all VTS
LMR regulations under one section.
B. Stakeholder Involvement
The Coast Guard recognizes that a
VTS on the LMR is a valuable asset to
all stakeholders that may be impacted
by what happens on or near the
waterway either directly or indirectly.
In addition, many of the stakeholders
who regularly utilize the waterway have
advised us that to achieve success, the
VTS must meet the needs of the
waterway users while imposing the least
burden.
In 1997, the Coast Guard formed the
Ports and Waterways Safety Systems
Committee (PWSSC). The Coast Guard
created this ad-hoc committee, a
subcommittee under the Lower
Mississippi River Waterway Safety
Advisory Committee (LMRWSAC), of
maritime, port community, government,
and public stakeholders to define user
requirements for a VTS that would
accomplish the overall goals of safety
and efficiency for the entire LMR. Since
its formation, the PWSSC met several
times, and the product of these meetings
was a conceptual baseline VTS plan (see
document USCG–1998–4399–0003 at
https://www.regulations.gov) endorsed
by the LMRWSAC. Key
recommendations of this plan involved
the need to implement AIS technology
and to incorporate AIS as a key
component of any VTS implementation.
The currently operating, voluntary
participation VTS on the LMR,
established in 2004, incorporated full
use of AIS technology.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
V. Discussion of Comments and
Changes
We received one response containing
two comments and a request for a public
meeting in response during the SNPRM
comment period that ended on January
11, 2010. The Coast Guard determined
that no significant issues were raised in
the request which would have justified
holding such a meeting and none was
held.
The first comment recommended
against the modeling of VTS LMR after
VTS operations in Morgan City,
Louisiana, and in Houston-Galveston,
Texas, stating that those ‘‘VTS zones do
not adequately fit the unique operating
conditions of the LMR. The Coast Guard
agrees in part. Although the VTM
system used at VTS LMR is similar to
the systems used in both Morgan City
and Houston-Galveston, and some VTS
operations are standardized through all
Coast Guard VTS Centers, the
operations of VTS LMR have been
tailored to the unique nature of the
Mississippi River, including the unique
operating requirements at Algiers Point,
as evidenced by the presence of Pilot
advisors in the VTC and the special
operating requirements being imposed
at Algiers Point.
The second comment requested that a
working group be established under the
auspices of the LMRWSAC to address
future changes to the VTS system. The
Coast Guard agrees that port
stakeholders should be involved in any
major changes to VTS operations. To the
extent that a future change to VTS
operations would require a change to
the governing regulations such a
regulation change would require a
rulemaking. As part of the rulemaking
process the public and port stakeholders
would have ample opportunity to
participate. Further, and the Coast
Guard intends to continue to consult
with the State of Louisiana, the affected
state and federal pilot’s associations,
vessel operators, users, and all other
affected stakeholders on VTS
operations. However, at this time the
Coast Guard is not planning any
significant changes to VTS operations
on the LMR and therefore does not see
the need to establish a separate working
group. The Coast Guard encourages
stakeholders to provide feedback on
VTS operations by contacting VTS LMR.
No changes to the rule text have been
made in response to these comments.
The text of the final rule is the same as
the text proposed in the SNPRM. For a
complete discussion of the rule, please
see the discussion included in the
SNPRM at 74 FR 58227.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66311
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Comments on the proposed rule are
summarized in the Discussion of
Comments and Changes section of this
preamble. The Coast Guard received no
comments that altered our assessment of
impacts in the SNPRM. We have found
no additional data or information that
changed our findings in the SNPRM. We
have adopted the assessment in the
SNPRM for this rule as final. Since
vessels presently follow the rules
outlined in this final rule, the Coast
Guard believes that this final rule will
only have a minimal economic impact.
This final rule will establish a VTS on
the LMR and transfer certain VTM
provisions of the Mississippi River,
Louisiana—Regulated Navigation Area
to the VTS. The rule will implement
current practices and procedures
appropriate to an AIS-based VTS.
Based on data from the Coast Guard
Marine Information for Safety and Law
Enforcement database, we estimate the
rule will affect 1,796 U.S.-flagged
vessels with hailing ports from mile
242.4 Above Head of Passes, which is
near Baton Rouge, to the territorial sea
boundary, and an estimated 2,294
foreign-flagged vessels.
The requirements for compliance with
this rule include:
• Certain classes of commercial
vessels will be required to carry
functioning AIS equipment and to
employ the AIS equipment while
operating within the VTS.
• Commercial vessels not required to
carry AIS equipment will be required to
follow established reporting procedures
via radiotelephone when operating
within the VTS area.
• The Coast Guard will maintain an
operational VTC to monitor and direct
traffic within the VTS.
In 2003, the Coast Guard published a
final rule that harmonized the AIS
carriage and standardization
requirements contained in the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
66312
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
with the requirements of the
International Convention for the Safety
of Life at Sea (SOLAS), that established
AIS carriage requirements for
commercial vessels (33 CFR part 164).
Because of this prior regulation, all U.S.flagged commercial vessels that are
required to carry AIS equipment for
operation in the VTS under this rule
have been in compliance since 2004.
Similarly, foreign-flagged vessels have
been required to carry AIS equipment
under the SOLAS Convention since
2004. A list of the categories of
commercial vessels and the dates of
compliance for AIS carriage are shown
in Table 1.
While this rule will establish a
mandatory participation VTS, its
principal effect will be to codify current
practices. The AIS carriage requirements
of this rule have been implemented
through prior regulations and we expect
that there will not be additional costs to
either industry or government resulting
from this rule.
TABLE 1—COMMERCIAL VESSELS: AIS CARRIAGE REQUIREMENTS
AIS currently required
Compliance date
Self-propelled vessels 65 feet or more in length in commercial service and on
an international voyage (excludes passenger and fishing vessels).
Passenger vessels of 150 gross tons or more on an international voyage ..........
Tankers on international voyages, regardless of tonnage ....................................
Vessels of 50,000 gross tons or more, other than tankers or passenger ships,
on international voyages.
Vessels of 300 gross tons or more but less than 50,000 gross tons, other than
tankers or passenger ships.
Self-propelled vessels of 65 feet or more in length in commercial service (excludes fishing vessels and passenger vessels certificated to carry less than
151 passengers for hire).
Towing vessels 26 feet or more in length and more than 600 horsepower in
commercial service.
Passenger vessels certificated to carry more than 150 passengers for hire ........
Fishing vessels .......................................................................................................
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Class of vessel
Yes .........................................................
December 31, 2004.
Yes .........................................................
Yes .........................................................
Yes .........................................................
July 1, 2003.
July 1, 2003.
July 1, 2004.
Yes .........................................................
December 31, 2004.
Yes, when operating in a VTS or Vessel Movement Reporting System
(VMRS).
Yes, when operating in a VTS or VMRS
December 31, 2004.
Commercial vessels that are not
required to carry AIS equipment must
maintain radiotelephone
communication with the VTC while
traversing the VTS. These requirements
have been in place since July 1982,
when the Coast Guard established
specific radiotelephone frequencies and
reporting procedures for vessels
operating in the Mississippi River, LA–
Regulated Navigation Area.
The Coast Guard has operated a VTC
from a shoreside facility in downtown
New Orleans since late 1999. This VTC
provides the core communications and
monitoring functions for the VTS.
The procedures and practices of this
rule are the same as those currently in
use at the Algiers Point/Crescent area of
the VTS. Currently, commercial vessel
movements in the VTS traverse the
Algiers Point/Crescent area and current
compliance with the rules of this area
fulfills the requirements of the larger
VTS.
As with the costs of the rule, the
benefits were also realized through
vessel compliance with the prior
regulations that established AIS and
radiotelephone carriage requirements
and the VTC operations center. The
principal benefit of changing VTS
participation from voluntary to
mandatory is to codify current practices
that increase the efficiency of vessel
operations on the LMR by consolidating
and standardizing vessel operating
procedures.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
Yes, when operating in a VTS or VMRS
No ..........................................................
December 31, 2004.
December 31, 2004.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard
certified under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that the
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We
received no comments on this
certification and have made no changes
that would alter our assessment of the
impacts in the NPRM.
Vessels are presently following the
procedures outlined in this final rule,
thus the adoption of these rules would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please consult with:
Lieutenant Commander Jim Larson,
Office of Shore Forces (CG–7413), Coast
Guard; telephone 202–372–1554, e-mail
James.W.Larson@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard. Small
businesses may send comments on the
actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Collection of Information
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments, and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined
that it has implications for federalism. A
summary of the impact of federalism in
this rule follows.
Title I of the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act (PWSA) (33 U.S.C. 1221 et
seq.) authorizes the Secretary to issue
regulations to establish and maintain
vessel traffic services consisting of
measures for controlling or supervising
vessel traffic to protect the marine
environment. In enacting PWSA in
1972, Congress found that advance
planning and consultation with the
affected States and other stakeholders
was necessary to develop and
implement a VTS. The Coast Guard,
throughout the development of the VTS
on the Lower Mississippi River, has
consulted with the State of Louisiana,
the affected State and Federal pilot’s
associations, vessel operators, users, and
all affected stakeholders. Maritime
conflict preemption principles apply to
PWSA Title I. The Coast Guard has
determined, after considering the factors
developed by the Supreme Court in the
consolidated cases of United States v.
Locke and Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S.
89, 120 S.Ct. 1135 (March 6, 2000), that
by enacting Chapter 25 of the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act, Congress
intended that Coast Guard regulations
have preemptive impact over State law
regarding vessel traffic services in
United States ports and waterways.
Therefore, the regulations proposed in
this rulemaking for operation and
equipment required on vessels preempt
any State laws or regulations on the
same subject matter.
Nevertheless, the Coast Guard
recognizes the key role State and local
governments may have in making
regulatory determinations. The State of
Louisiana and the Coast Guard have
worked closely throughout the
development of these regulations.
Additionally, Sections 4 and 6 of
Executive Order 13132 require that for
any rules with preemptive effect, the
Coast Guard shall provide elected
officials of affected State and local
governments and their representative
national organizations the notice and
opportunity for appropriate
participation in any rulemaking
proceedings, and to consult with such
officials early in the rulemaking process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
This participation and consultation has
taken place within the Ports and
Waterways Safety Systems Committee
(PWSSC), which was formed in 1997.
This ad-hoc committee of maritime, port
community, and public stakeholders has
met several times, and the product of
these meetings was a conceptual
baseline VTS plan (see U.S. Coast Guard
Docket USCG–1998–4399–0003 at
https://www.regulations.gov). The State
of Louisiana was an active participant of
PWSSC meetings and contributed to this
plan. The Coast Guard will continue to
consult with the State of Louisiana, the
Governor’s Task Force on Maritime
Industry, as well as all affected
stakeholders during implementation.
The preemptive impact of this rule is
codified in new 33 CFR 161.6. New
§ 161.6 is slightly modified from the
version proposed in the SNPRM to more
accurately reflect that maritime conflict
preemption principles apply to the
regulations in this part. The preemptive
impact of new § 161.6 is unchanged
from the preemptive impact of proposed
§ 161.6.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. This rule would
not impose an unfunded mandate.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66313
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
66314
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2, figure
2–1, paragraph 34(g) and (i) of the
Instruction. This rule involves
implementing current practices to
facilitate vessel transit, promote safe
navigation and improve existing
waterway operating measures. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
■
PART 161—VESSEL TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
§ 161.6
1. The authority citation for part 161
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
70114, 70119; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat.
2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 161.2, revise paragraph (3) of
the definition of Hazardous Vessel
Operating Condition to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects
§ 161.2
33 CFR Part 161
*
Harbors, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
Hazardous Vessel Operating Condition
*
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 161 and 165 as follows:
3. Add § 161.6 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(3) Vessel characteristics that affect or
restrict maneuverability, such as cargo
or tow arrangement, trim, loaded
condition, underkeel or overhead
clearance, speed capabilities, power
availability, or similar characteristics,
which may affect the positive control or
safe handling of the vessel or the tow.
*
*
*
*
*
Preemption.
The regulations in this part have
preemptive impact over State laws or
regulations on the same subject matter.
The Coast Guard has determined, after
considering the factors developed by the
Supreme Court in U.S. v. Locke, 529
U.S. 89 (2000), that by enacting Chapter
25 of the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act (33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), Congress
intended that Coast Guard regulations
preempt State laws or regulations
regarding vessel traffic services in
United States ports and waterways.
4. In § 161.12, in Table 161.12(c)—
a. In footnote 6, remove the words
‘‘VTS Lower Mississippi River and’’; and
■ b. Amend Table 161.12(c) by revising
the entries to New Orleans Traffic, to
read as follows.
■
■
§ 161.12
*
*
Vessel operating requirements.
*
*
*
TABLE 161.12(c)—VTS AND VMRS CENTERS, CALL SIGNS/MMSI, DESIGNATED FREQUENCIES, AND MONITORING AREAS
Designated frequency (channel
designation)—purpose 2
Center MMSI 1 call sign
*
*
Lower Mississippi River—0036699952:
New Orleans traffic .........................
156.550 MHz (Ch. 11) ...........................
New Orleans traffic .........................
156.600 MHz (Ch. 12) ...........................
New Orleans traffic .........................
156.250 MHz (Ch. 05A) .........................
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
*
*
*
Monitoring area 3 4
*
*
*
*
*
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River below
29°55.3′ N 089°55.6′ W (Saxonholm Light) at 86.0 miles
Above Head of Passes (AHP), extending down river to
Southwest Pass, and, within a 12 nautical mile radius
around 28°54.3′ N 089°25.7′ W (Southwest Pass Entrance Light at 20.1 miles Below Head of Passes.
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River bounded on the north by a line drawn perpendicular on the river
at 29°55′30″ N and 090°12′46″ W (Upper Twelve Mile
Point) at 109.0 miles AHP and on the south by a line
drawn perpendicularly at 29°55.3′ N 089°55.6′ W
(Saxonholm Light) at 86.0 miles AHP.
The navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River below
30°38.7′ N 091°17.5′ W (Port Hudson Light) at 254.5
miles AHP bounded on the south by a line drawn perpendicular on the river at 29°55′30″ N and 090°12′46″ W
(Upper Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0 miles AHP.
*
*
*
*
Notes:
1 Maritime Mobile Service Identifier (MMSI) is a unique nine-digit number assigned by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that
identifies ship stations, ship earth stations, coast stations, coast earth stations, and group calls for use by a digital selective calling (DSC) radio,
an INMARSAT ship earth station or AIS. AIS requirements are set forth in §§ 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter. The requirements set forth in
§§ 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter apply in those areas denoted with an MMSI number.
2 In the event of a communication failure, difficulties, or other safety factors, the Center may direct or permit a user to monitor and report on
any other designated monitoring frequency or the bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Channel 13) or 156.375 MHz (Channel
67), to the extent that doing so provides a level of safety beyond that provided by other means. The bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency,
156.650 MHz (Ch. 13), is used in certain monitoring areas where the level of reporting does not warrant a designated frequency.
3 All geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) are expressed in North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
4 Some monitoring areas extend beyond navigable waters. Although not required, users are strongly encouraged to maintain a listening watch
on the designated monitoring frequency in these areas. Otherwise, they are required to maintain watch as stated in 47 CFR 80.148.
*
■
*
*
*
*
5. Add § 161.65 to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
§ 161.65 Vessel Traffic Service Lower
Mississippi River.
(a) The Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)
area consists of navigable waters of the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Lower Mississippi River (LMR) below
30°38.7′ N 91°17.5′ W (Port Hudson
Light at 254.5 miles Above Head of
Passes (AHP)), the Southwest Pass, and
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
those within a 12-nautical mile radius
around 28°54.3′ N 89°25.7′ W
(Southwest Pass Entrance Light at 20.1
miles Below Head of Passes).
(b) The Algiers Point VTS Special
Area consists of the navigable waters of
the LMR bounded on the north by a line
drawn from 29°57.62′ N 90°02.61′ W to
29°57.34′ N 90°02.60′ W and on the
south by a line drawn from 29°56.89′ N
90°03.72′ W to 29°56.93′ N 90°03.34′ W
(95.0 and 93.5 miles AHP) during
periods of high water—that is, when the
Carrolton Gage reads 8.0 feet or above
on a rising stage or 9.0 feet or above on
a falling stage, or under any other water
conditions the Captain of the Port
(COTP) deems necessary.
(c) Additional Algiers Point VTS
Special Area Operating Requirements.
The following additional requirements
are applicable in the Algiers Point VTS
Special Area:
(1) A vessel movement reporting
system (VMRS) user must abide by the
signals of the Governor Nicholls Street
Wharf, 29°57.6′ N 90°03.4′ W, and
Gretna, 29°55.5′ N 90°03.7′ W, Control
Lights (94.3 and 96.6 miles AHP,
respectively) in the following manner:
(i) Green Light—May proceed as
intended.
(ii) Red Light—Do not proceed, unless
otherwise directed by the VTS.
(iii) No Light—Do not proceed,
immediately notify VTS and await
further directions.
Note to § 161.65(c)(1): To provide advance
notification to downbound vessels, a traffic
repeater signal of Gretna Light is located at
Westwego, LA, 29°54.8′ N; 90°08.3′ W (101.4
miles AHP).
(2) A vessel awaiting a signal change
or VTS directions must keep clear of
other vessels transiting the area.
(d) The Eighty-one Mile Point VTS
Special Area consists of navigable
waters of the LMR between 167.5 miles
AHP and 187.9 miles AHP.
(e) Additional Eighty-one Mile Point
VTS Special Area Operating
Requirements. The following additional
requirements are applicable in the
Eighty-one Mile Point VTS Special
Area:
(1) Prior to proceeding upriver past
167.5 miles AHP, Sunshine Bridge,
vessels must contact VTS New Orleans
on VHF Channel 5A to check-in. Vessels
must provide name and destination,
confirm proper operation of their
automated identification system (AIS) if
required under 33 CFR 164.46, and, if
applicable, size of tow and number of
loaded and empty barges. At 173.7 miles
AHP, Bringier Point Light, ascending
vessels must contact VTS New Orleans
and provide a follow-on position check.
At both check-in and follow-on position
check, VTS New Orleans will advise the
66315
vessel on traffic approaching Eighty-one
Mile Point.
(2) Prior to proceeding downriver past
187.9 miles AHP COS–MAR Lights,
vessels must contact VTS New Orleans
on VHF Channel 5A to check-in. Vessels
must provide name and destination,
confirm proper operation of their AIS if
required under 33 CFR 164.46, and, if
applicable, size of tow and number of
loaded and empty barges. At 183.9 miles
AHP, Wyandotte Chemical Dock Lights,
descending vessels must contact VTS
New Orleans and provide a follow-on
position check. At both check-in and
follow-on position check, VTS New
Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic
approaching Eighty-one Mile Point.
(3) All vessels getting underway
between miles 167.5 and 187.9 AHP
must check-in with VTS New Orleans
on VHF Channel 5A immediately prior
to getting underway and must comply
with the respective ascending and
descending check-in and follow-on
points listed in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2)
of this section.
(4) Fleet vessels must checkin with
VTS New Orleans if they leave their
respective fleet or if they move into the
main channel. Fleet vessels are not
required to checkin if they are operating
exclusively within their fleet.
(f) Reporting Points. Table 161.65(f)
lists the VTS Lower Mississippi River
Reporting Points.
TABLE 161.65(f)—VTS LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER REPORTING POINTS
Latitude/
Longitude/
mile marker
Geographic
description
Designator
Geographic name
A ...........................
Algiers Canal Forebay ........................
88.0 AHP
29°56.6′ N; 90°10.1′ W
B ...........................
Industrial Canal ..................................
92.7 AHP
29°57.2′ N; 90°01.68′ W
C ..........................
Crescent Towing Smith Fleet .............
93.5 AHP
29°57.50′ N; 90°02.62′ W
D ..........................
Marlex Terminal (Naval Ships) ...........
99.0 AHP
29°54.65′ N; 90°05.87′ W
E ...........................
Huey P Long Bridge ...........................
106.1 AHP
29°55.40′ N; 89°57.7′ W
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
6. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
7. In § 165.810—
■
a. Remove and reserve paragraph (c);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Oct 27, 2010
Jkt 223001
Notes
Upbound transiting Algiers Point Special Area.
Upbound transiting Algiers Point Special Area.
Upbound Towing vessels transiting
Algiers Point Special Area.
Downbound transiting Algiers Point
Special Area.
Downbound transiting Algiers Point
Special Area.
■
b. Remove and reserve paragraph (g);
and
■ c. Add a note at the end of the section
to read as follows:
(previously referenced in paragraph (g) of
this section) used to manage vessel traffic in
the vicinity of Eighty-one Mile Point are
located in 33 CFR 161.65(e).
§ 165.810 Mississippi River, LA-regulated
navigation area.
Dated: October 22, 2010.
Vincent B. Atkins,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant
Commandant for Capabilities.
*
*
*
*
*
Note to § 165.810: Control Light provisions
(previously referenced in paragraph (c) of
this section) used to manage vessel traffic
during periods of high waters in the vicinity
of Algiers Point are located in 33 CFR
161.65(c). The special operating requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2010–27235 Filed 10–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66309-66315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27235]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 161 and 165
[Docket No. USCG-1998-4399]
RIN 1625-AA58
Vessel Traffic Service Lower Mississippi River
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)
on the Lower Mississippi River and is transferring certain vessel
traffic management (VTM) provisions of the Mississippi River,
Louisiana--Regulated Navigation Area to the VTS. This final rule
establishes a mandatory participation VTS by implementing current
voluntary practices and operating procedures. This rule facilitates
vessel transits, enhances good order, promotes safe navigation, and
improves existing waterway operating measures. The rule also proposes
minor conforming revisions to the existing VTM provisions and related
regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-1998-4399 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-1998-4399 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking
``Search.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander Jim Larson, Office of Shore Forces
(CG-7413), Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1554, e-mail
James.W.Larson@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Regulatory History
III. Basis and Purpose
IV. Background
A. Vessel Traffic Services
B. Stakeholder Involvement
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
AIS Automatic Identification System
DHS Department of Homeland Security
LMR Lower Mississippi River
LMRWSAC Lower Mississippi River Waterways Safety Advisory Committee
NDG National Dialogue Group
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PAWSS Port and Waterways Safety Systems
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
PWSSC Ports and Waterways Safety Systems Committee
SNPRM Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
VTC Vessel Traffic Center
VTM Vessel Traffic Management
VTS Vessel Traffic Service
II. Regulatory History
On April 26, 2000, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Vessel Traffic Service Lower Mississippi
River'' (65 FR 24516) and requested comments during a 90-day comment
period. Due to several requests for additional time to comment, on
August 18, 2000, the Coast Guard published a notice (65 FR 50479)
reopening the comment period until December 1, 2000. The Coast Guard
received 23 letters containing three comments in response to the NPRM.
On September 20, 2000, the Coast Guard published a notice of public
meeting (65 FR 56843) announcing the time and place of a public
meeting. On October 24, 2000, the Coast Guard held the meeting in New
Orleans, LA, to receive comments on the proposed rule. Twenty-four
people attended the meeting and two people spoke.
On November 12, 2009, the Coast Guard published a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled ``Vessel Traffic Service
Lower Mississippi River'' (74 FR 58223). The SNPRM addressed important
changes to maritime operations that have taken
[[Page 66310]]
place since the NPRM was published,\1\ specifically: (1) The Coast
Guard has installed and operationally tested a computer based Vessel
Traffic Management (VTM) system that utilizes Automatic Identification
System (AIS), closed circuit television cameras (CCTV), radar, and VHF
radio communications to monitor and advise vessel traffic on the Lower
Mississippi River (LMR), (2) the Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) Center is
now fully staffed by trained and certified Coast Guard civilian
employees augmented by two onsite Pilot Advisors, (3) remote traffic
control light tower operations have been transitioned to the VTS
Center, (4) AIS is now fully integrated with the Coast Guard traffic
management systems throughout the United States,\2\ and (5) the Coast
Guard established a voluntary participation VTS in LMR.\3\ In the
SNPRM, we also addressed the comments received on the NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For a more complete discussion of the reasons the Coast
Guard published an SNPRM see 74 FR 58223.
\2\ For a more complete discussion of AIS Carriage Requirement
see the Coast Guard ``Automatic Identification System; Vessel
Carriage Requirement'' final rule published on October 22, 2003, 68
FR 60559.
\3\ The Coast Guard established a voluntary participation VTS in
the LMR in 2004 that has been continuously operated since that time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received one letter containing two comments in response to the
SNPRM, which are discussed later in this preamble.
III. Basis and Purpose
This final rule is issued, pursuant to the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act (PWSA), as amended, (codified at 33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), to
establish VTSs in the United States. Title I of the PWSA authorizes the
Secretary to promulgate regulations to establish and maintain VTSs
consisting of measures for controlling or supervising vessel traffic to
protect the marine environment. 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231.
The Coast Guard operates 12 VTSs in the United States. A VTS
provides navigation and safety information that enables mariners to
make informed decisions during their voyage. In the past, the Coast
Guard operated variations of a VTS in the New Orleans area.
Unfortunately, these efforts were hindered by budget constraints, the
limitations of voluntary participation, and the temporary or part-time
nature of the VTS operation; none of these proved to be a permanent or
complete solution to the challenges of navigating the LMR.
This rule establishes mandatory participation for certain classes
of vessels in the VTS LMR area. It amends vessel traffic measures
within the Mississippi River Regulated Navigation Area and formalizes
the existing, voluntary VTS on the LMR. Additionally, this rule updates
certain operating practices, adopts standard traffic management
procedures, and informs mariners of certain services provided by VTS
LMR.
IV. Background
A. Vessel Traffic Services
Since disestablishment of the VTS in New Orleans in the 1980s, the
Coast Guard, as directed by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90, Pub.
L. 101-380), has:
(1) Validated the need for VTSs in certain ports;
(2) Made participation mandatory in all VTS ports established in
the National VTS regulations; and
(3) Invested in infrastructure improvement to VTS equipment and
standardized operating procedures across all United States VTSs.
In 1997, the Coast Guard established the Ports and Waterways Safety
System (PAWSS) acquisition project to address waterway users' needs and
place a greater emphasis on partnerships with industry to reduce risk
in the marine environment. As part of PAWSS, the Coast Guard
immediately convened a National Dialogue Group (NDG) comprised of
maritime and waterway community stakeholders to identify the needs of
waterway users with respect to VTM and VTS systems. The Coast Guard
sponsored these discussions, which were hosted by the Committee on
Maritime Advanced Information Systems under the auspices of the Marine
Board of the National Research Council. Those stakeholders,
representing all major sectors of the U.S. and foreign-flagged maritime
industry, port authorities, pilots, the environmental community, and
the Coast Guard, were tasked to: (1) Identify the information needs of
waterway users to ensure safe passage; (2) assist in establishing a
process to identify candidate waterways for VTM improvements and VTS
installations; and (3) identify the basic elements of a VTS. The goal
of the NDG was to provide a foundation for the development of an
approach to VTM that would meet the shared government, industry, and
public objective of ensuring the safety of vessel traffic in U.S. ports
and waterways in a technologically sound and cost effective way.
A federally operated and locally adopted VTM facility has been in
place in New Orleans Harbor since the 1930s. In an effort to assist the
mariner, safeguard the port, ensure good order, and improve safety, the
local maritime community implemented the Algiers Point Control Lights.
This system evolved from local river pilots standing watch using
lanterns and whistle signals to a 24-hour, federally staffed
communication station with twin control light towers at Governor
Nicholls Street Wharf and Gretna Lights. Although not formally
recognized as a VTS, the Algiers Point Control Lights have provided
longstanding traffic management services.
Vessel movement in the vicinity of Algiers Point/Crescent area is
currently subject to regulatory provisions established in 33 CFR
165.810(c). The primary objective of the existing regulatory system in
33 CFR 165.810(c) is to provide an orderly traffic flow around Algiers
Point.
Algiers Point is one of the most challenging bends to safely
navigate on the Mississippi River, particularly in high water
conditions. In one of the busiest industrial harbors in the world,
vessels must negotiate a 120-degree bend in the river amidst constantly
changing hydrographic conditions, congested waters, and various bridges
and piers. Mandatory vessel traffic measures, represented by the light
signals, are utilized to lessen the potential for mishap during periods
of high water. The consequences of improper navigation in this segment
of the river are both significant and well-documented. Since 1991,
there have been multiple reportable marine casualties within the area
covered by this rulemaking. The failure to safely transit this area can
quickly lead to a mishap that causes substantial property damage,
serious environmental and economic consequences, and even loss of life.
The existing Control Light operation in and around Algiers Point
has proven valuable in some measures of VTM; however, these measures
are narrow in scope, limited to a small area, and only operated during
periods of high water. The limited scope of the facility has caused
further problems at times: Equipment, staffing, and location
limitations have sometimes hindered the light operator's ability to
ensure the overall safety and efficiency of anticipated vessel traffic
beyond the immediate vicinity of Algiers Point.
The Coast Guard and local mariners recognize that this segment of
the waterway warrants great vigilance. The nature of vessel traffic
within this area and the anticipated increase in traffic requires that
certain vessel traffic measures are active at all times or at
[[Page 66311]]
least available at a moment's notice. The availability of these
measures can best be assured by operating a Vessel Traffic Center (VTC)
for Algiers Point within the framework of a VTS. A VTC is a shoreside
facility from which the VTS operates and has the communications
capability to interact with marine traffic and respond to developing
situations.
Through implementation of a continuously-operating VTC at Algiers
Point within the framework of the mandatory LMR VTS being created by
this rule, the Coast Guard seeks to overcome the limited scope of the
existing Control Light operation and use the enhanced system
capabilities of the mandatory LMR VTS to improve navigation safety on
and around both Algiers Point and the entire LMR.
The procedures and practices in this rule concerning Algiers Point
VTC are essentially the same as those currently used in the Algiers
Point. This final rule simply moves the Algiers Point provisions from
current 33 CFR 165.810(c) to new 33 CFR 161.65(c) to integrate the
Algiers Point VTC into the VTS LMR and to consolidate all VTS LMR
regulations under one section.
B. Stakeholder Involvement
The Coast Guard recognizes that a VTS on the LMR is a valuable
asset to all stakeholders that may be impacted by what happens on or
near the waterway either directly or indirectly. In addition, many of
the stakeholders who regularly utilize the waterway have advised us
that to achieve success, the VTS must meet the needs of the waterway
users while imposing the least burden.
In 1997, the Coast Guard formed the Ports and Waterways Safety
Systems Committee (PWSSC). The Coast Guard created this ad-hoc
committee, a subcommittee under the Lower Mississippi River Waterway
Safety Advisory Committee (LMRWSAC), of maritime, port community,
government, and public stakeholders to define user requirements for a
VTS that would accomplish the overall goals of safety and efficiency
for the entire LMR. Since its formation, the PWSSC met several times,
and the product of these meetings was a conceptual baseline VTS plan
(see document USCG-1998-4399-0003 at https://www.regulations.gov)
endorsed by the LMRWSAC. Key recommendations of this plan involved the
need to implement AIS technology and to incorporate AIS as a key
component of any VTS implementation. The currently operating, voluntary
participation VTS on the LMR, established in 2004, incorporated full
use of AIS technology.
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received one response containing two comments and a request for
a public meeting in response during the SNPRM comment period that ended
on January 11, 2010. The Coast Guard determined that no significant
issues were raised in the request which would have justified holding
such a meeting and none was held.
The first comment recommended against the modeling of VTS LMR after
VTS operations in Morgan City, Louisiana, and in Houston-Galveston,
Texas, stating that those ``VTS zones do not adequately fit the unique
operating conditions of the LMR. The Coast Guard agrees in part.
Although the VTM system used at VTS LMR is similar to the systems used
in both Morgan City and Houston-Galveston, and some VTS operations are
standardized through all Coast Guard VTS Centers, the operations of VTS
LMR have been tailored to the unique nature of the Mississippi River,
including the unique operating requirements at Algiers Point, as
evidenced by the presence of Pilot advisors in the VTC and the special
operating requirements being imposed at Algiers Point.
The second comment requested that a working group be established
under the auspices of the LMRWSAC to address future changes to the VTS
system. The Coast Guard agrees that port stakeholders should be
involved in any major changes to VTS operations. To the extent that a
future change to VTS operations would require a change to the governing
regulations such a regulation change would require a rulemaking. As
part of the rulemaking process the public and port stakeholders would
have ample opportunity to participate. Further, and the Coast Guard
intends to continue to consult with the State of Louisiana, the
affected state and federal pilot's associations, vessel operators,
users, and all other affected stakeholders on VTS operations. However,
at this time the Coast Guard is not planning any significant changes to
VTS operations on the LMR and therefore does not see the need to
establish a separate working group. The Coast Guard encourages
stakeholders to provide feedback on VTS operations by contacting VTS
LMR.
No changes to the rule text have been made in response to these
comments. The text of the final rule is the same as the text proposed
in the SNPRM. For a complete discussion of the rule, please see the
discussion included in the SNPRM at 74 FR 58227.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Comments on the proposed rule are summarized in the Discussion of
Comments and Changes section of this preamble. The Coast Guard received
no comments that altered our assessment of impacts in the SNPRM. We
have found no additional data or information that changed our findings
in the SNPRM. We have adopted the assessment in the SNPRM for this rule
as final. Since vessels presently follow the rules outlined in this
final rule, the Coast Guard believes that this final rule will only
have a minimal economic impact.
This final rule will establish a VTS on the LMR and transfer
certain VTM provisions of the Mississippi River, Louisiana--Regulated
Navigation Area to the VTS. The rule will implement current practices
and procedures appropriate to an AIS-based VTS.
Based on data from the Coast Guard Marine Information for Safety
and Law Enforcement database, we estimate the rule will affect 1,796
U.S.-flagged vessels with hailing ports from mile 242.4 Above Head of
Passes, which is near Baton Rouge, to the territorial sea boundary, and
an estimated 2,294 foreign-flagged vessels.
The requirements for compliance with this rule include:
Certain classes of commercial vessels will be required to
carry functioning AIS equipment and to employ the AIS equipment while
operating within the VTS.
Commercial vessels not required to carry AIS equipment
will be required to follow established reporting procedures via
radiotelephone when operating within the VTS area.
The Coast Guard will maintain an operational VTC to
monitor and direct traffic within the VTS.
In 2003, the Coast Guard published a final rule that harmonized the
AIS carriage and standardization requirements contained in the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002
[[Page 66312]]
with the requirements of the International Convention for the Safety of
Life at Sea (SOLAS), that established AIS carriage requirements for
commercial vessels (33 CFR part 164). Because of this prior regulation,
all U.S.-flagged commercial vessels that are required to carry AIS
equipment for operation in the VTS under this rule have been in
compliance since 2004. Similarly, foreign-flagged vessels have been
required to carry AIS equipment under the SOLAS Convention since 2004.
A list of the categories of commercial vessels and the dates of
compliance for AIS carriage are shown in Table 1.
While this rule will establish a mandatory participation VTS, its
principal effect will be to codify current practices. The AIS carriage
requirements of this rule have been implemented through prior
regulations and we expect that there will not be additional costs to
either industry or government resulting from this rule.
Table 1--Commercial Vessels: AIS Carriage Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIS currently
Class of vessel required Compliance date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-propelled vessels 65 Yes............ December 31, 2004.
feet or more in length in
commercial service and on an
international voyage
(excludes passenger and
fishing vessels).
Passenger vessels of 150 Yes............ July 1, 2003.
gross tons or more on an
international voyage.
Tankers on international Yes............ July 1, 2003.
voyages, regardless of
tonnage.
Vessels of 50,000 gross tons Yes............ July 1, 2004.
or more, other than tankers
or passenger ships, on
international voyages.
Vessels of 300 gross tons or Yes............ December 31, 2004.
more but less than 50,000
gross tons, other than
tankers or passenger ships.
Self-propelled vessels of 65 Yes, when December 31, 2004.
feet or more in length in operating in a
commercial service (excludes VTS or Vessel
fishing vessels and Movement
passenger vessels Reporting
certificated to carry less System (VMRS).
than 151 passengers for
hire).
Towing vessels 26 feet or Yes, when December 31, 2004.
more in length and more than operating in a
600 horsepower in commercial VTS or VMRS.
service.
Passenger vessels Yes, when December 31, 2004.
certificated to carry more operating in a
than 150 passengers for hire. VTS or VMRS.
Fishing vessels.............. No............. ........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial vessels that are not required to carry AIS equipment
must maintain radiotelephone communication with the VTC while
traversing the VTS. These requirements have been in place since July
1982, when the Coast Guard established specific radiotelephone
frequencies and reporting procedures for vessels operating in the
Mississippi River, LA-Regulated Navigation Area.
The Coast Guard has operated a VTC from a shoreside facility in
downtown New Orleans since late 1999. This VTC provides the core
communications and monitoring functions for the VTS.
The procedures and practices of this rule are the same as those
currently in use at the Algiers Point/Crescent area of the VTS.
Currently, commercial vessel movements in the VTS traverse the Algiers
Point/Crescent area and current compliance with the rules of this area
fulfills the requirements of the larger VTS.
As with the costs of the rule, the benefits were also realized
through vessel compliance with the prior regulations that established
AIS and radiotelephone carriage requirements and the VTC operations
center. The principal benefit of changing VTS participation from
voluntary to mandatory is to codify current practices that increase the
efficiency of vessel operations on the LMR by consolidating and
standardizing vessel operating procedures.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
In the NPRM, the Coast Guard certified under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
the proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We received no comments on this
certification and have made no changes that would alter our assessment
of the impacts in the NPRM.
Vessels are presently following the procedures outlined in this
final rule, thus the adoption of these rules would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please consult with: Lieutenant
Commander Jim Larson, Office of Shore Forces (CG-7413), Coast Guard;
telephone 202-372-1554, e-mail James.W.Larson@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with,
Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
[[Page 66313]]
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments, and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them.
We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have
determined that it has implications for federalism. A summary of the
impact of federalism in this rule follows.
Title I of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA) (33 U.S.C.
1221 et seq.) authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations to
establish and maintain vessel traffic services consisting of measures
for controlling or supervising vessel traffic to protect the marine
environment. In enacting PWSA in 1972, Congress found that advance
planning and consultation with the affected States and other
stakeholders was necessary to develop and implement a VTS. The Coast
Guard, throughout the development of the VTS on the Lower Mississippi
River, has consulted with the State of Louisiana, the affected State
and Federal pilot's associations, vessel operators, users, and all
affected stakeholders. Maritime conflict preemption principles apply to
PWSA Title I. The Coast Guard has determined, after considering the
factors developed by the Supreme Court in the consolidated cases of
United States v. Locke and Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89, 120 S.Ct.
1135 (March 6, 2000), that by enacting Chapter 25 of the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act, Congress intended that Coast Guard regulations
have preemptive impact over State law regarding vessel traffic services
in United States ports and waterways. Therefore, the regulations
proposed in this rulemaking for operation and equipment required on
vessels preempt any State laws or regulations on the same subject
matter.
Nevertheless, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role State and
local governments may have in making regulatory determinations. The
State of Louisiana and the Coast Guard have worked closely throughout
the development of these regulations. Additionally, Sections 4 and 6 of
Executive Order 13132 require that for any rules with preemptive
effect, the Coast Guard shall provide elected officials of affected
State and local governments and their representative national
organizations the notice and opportunity for appropriate participation
in any rulemaking proceedings, and to consult with such officials early
in the rulemaking process. This participation and consultation has
taken place within the Ports and Waterways Safety Systems Committee
(PWSSC), which was formed in 1997. This ad-hoc committee of maritime,
port community, and public stakeholders has met several times, and the
product of these meetings was a conceptual baseline VTS plan (see U.S.
Coast Guard Docket USCG-1998-4399-0003 at https://www.regulations.gov).
The State of Louisiana was an active participant of PWSSC meetings and
contributed to this plan. The Coast Guard will continue to consult with
the State of Louisiana, the Governor's Task Force on Maritime Industry,
as well as all affected stakeholders during implementation.
The preemptive impact of this rule is codified in new 33 CFR 161.6.
New Sec. 161.6 is slightly modified from the version proposed in the
SNPRM to more accurately reflect that maritime conflict preemption
principles apply to the regulations in this part. The preemptive impact
of new Sec. 161.6 is unchanged from the preemptive impact of proposed
Sec. 161.6.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. This rule would not impose an
unfunded mandate.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
[[Page 66314]]
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2,
figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g) and (i) of the Instruction. This rule
involves implementing current practices to facilitate vessel transit,
promote safe navigation and improve existing waterway operating
measures. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 161
Harbors, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 161 and 165 as follows:
PART 161--VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 161 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 70114, 70119; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 161.2, revise paragraph (3) of the definition of Hazardous
Vessel Operating Condition to read as follows:
Sec. 161.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Hazardous Vessel Operating Condition
* * * * *
(3) Vessel characteristics that affect or restrict maneuverability,
such as cargo or tow arrangement, trim, loaded condition, underkeel or
overhead clearance, speed capabilities, power availability, or similar
characteristics, which may affect the positive control or safe handling
of the vessel or the tow.
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 161.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 161.6 Preemption.
The regulations in this part have preemptive impact over State laws
or regulations on the same subject matter. The Coast Guard has
determined, after considering the factors developed by the Supreme
Court in U.S. v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000), that by enacting Chapter 25
of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (33 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.),
Congress intended that Coast Guard regulations preempt State laws or
regulations regarding vessel traffic services in United States ports
and waterways.
0
4. In Sec. 161.12, in Table 161.12(c)--
0
a. In footnote 6, remove the words ``VTS Lower Mississippi River and'';
and
0
b. Amend Table 161.12(c) by revising the entries to New Orleans
Traffic, to read as follows.
Sec. 161.12 Vessel operating requirements.
* * * * *
Table 161.12(c)--VTS and VMRS Centers, Call Signs/MMSI, Designated Frequencies, and Monitoring Areas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center MMSI \1\ call sign Designated frequency (channel designation)--purpose \2\ Monitoring area 3 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Lower Mississippi River--0036699952:
New Orleans traffic.................................... 156.550 MHz (Ch. 11)....................................... The navigable waters of the
Lower Mississippi River below
29[deg]55.3' N 089[deg]55.6'
W (Saxonholm Light) at 86.0
miles Above Head of Passes
(AHP), extending down river
to Southwest Pass, and,
within a 12 nautical mile
radius around 28[deg]54.3' N
089[deg]25.7' W (Southwest
Pass Entrance Light at 20.1
miles Below Head of Passes.
New Orleans traffic.................................... 156.600 MHz (Ch. 12)....................................... The navigable waters of the
Lower Mississippi River
bounded on the north by a
line drawn perpendicular on
the river at 29[deg]55'30'' N
and 090[deg]12'46'' W (Upper
Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0
miles AHP and on the south by
a line drawn perpendicularly
at 29[deg]55.3' N
089[deg]55.6' W (Saxonholm
Light) at 86.0 miles AHP.
New Orleans traffic.................................... 156.250 MHz (Ch. 05A)...................................... The navigable waters of the
Lower Mississippi River below
30[deg]38.7' N 091[deg]17.5'
W (Port Hudson Light) at
254.5 miles AHP bounded on
the south by a line drawn
perpendicular on the river at
29[deg]55'30'' N and
090[deg]12'46'' W (Upper
Twelve Mile Point) at 109.0
miles AHP.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Maritime Mobile Service Identifier (MMSI) is a unique nine-digit number assigned by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that identifies ship
stations, ship earth stations, coast stations, coast earth stations, and group calls for use by a digital selective calling (DSC) radio, an INMARSAT
ship earth station or AIS. AIS requirements are set forth in Sec. Sec. 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter. The requirements set forth in Sec.
Sec. 161.21 and 164.46 of this subchapter apply in those areas denoted with an MMSI number.
\2\ In the event of a communication failure, difficulties, or other safety factors, the Center may direct or permit a user to monitor and report on any
other designated monitoring frequency or the bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Channel 13) or 156.375 MHz (Channel 67), to the
extent that doing so provides a level of safety beyond that provided by other means. The bridge-to-bridge navigational frequency, 156.650 MHz (Ch.
13), is used in certain monitoring areas where the level of reporting does not warrant a designated frequency.
\3\ All geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) are expressed in North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
\4\ Some monitoring areas extend beyond navigable waters. Although not required, users are strongly encouraged to maintain a listening watch on the
designated monitoring frequency in these areas. Otherwise, they are required to maintain watch as stated in 47 CFR 80.148.
* * * * *
0
5. Add Sec. 161.65 to read as follows:
Sec. 161.65 Vessel Traffic Service Lower Mississippi River.
(a) The Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) area consists of navigable
waters of the Lower Mississippi River (LMR) below 30[deg]38.7' N
91[deg]17.5' W (Port Hudson Light at 254.5 miles Above Head of Passes
(AHP)), the Southwest Pass, and
[[Page 66315]]
those within a 12-nautical mile radius around 28[deg]54.3' N
89[deg]25.7' W (Southwest Pass Entrance Light at 20.1 miles Below Head
of Passes).
(b) The Algiers Point VTS Special Area consists of the navigable
waters of the LMR bounded on the north by a line drawn from
29[deg]57.62' N 90[deg]02.61' W to 29[deg]57.34' N 90[deg]02.60' W and
on the south by a line drawn from 29[deg]56.89' N 90[deg]03.72' W to
29[deg]56.93' N 90[deg]03.34' W (95.0 and 93.5 miles AHP) during
periods of high water--that is, when the Carrolton Gage reads 8.0 feet
or above on a rising stage or 9.0 feet or above on a falling stage, or
under any other water conditions the Captain of the Port (COTP) deems
necessary.
(c) Additional Algiers Point VTS Special Area Operating
Requirements. The following additional requirements are applicable in
the Algiers Point VTS Special Area:
(1) A vessel movement reporting system (VMRS) user must abide by
the signals of the Governor Nicholls Street Wharf, 29[deg]57.6' N
90[deg]03.4' W, and Gretna, 29[deg]55.5' N 90[deg]03.7' W, Control
Lights (94.3 and 96.6 miles AHP, respectively) in the following manner:
(i) Green Light--May proceed as intended.
(ii) Red Light--Do not proceed, unless otherwise directed by the
VTS.
(iii) No Light--Do not proceed, immediately notify VTS and await
further directions.
Note to Sec. 161.65(c)(1): To provide advance notification to
downbound vessels, a traffic repeater signal of Gretna Light is
located at Westwego, LA, 29[deg]54.8' N; 90[deg]08.3' W (101.4 miles
AHP).
(2) A vessel awaiting a signal change or VTS directions must keep
clear of other vessels transiting the area.
(d) The Eighty-one Mile Point VTS Special Area consists of
navigable waters of the LMR between 167.5 miles AHP and 187.9 miles
AHP.
(e) Additional Eighty-one Mile Point VTS Special Area Operating
Requirements. The following additional requirements are applicable in
the Eighty-one Mile Point VTS Special Area:
(1) Prior to proceeding upriver past 167.5 miles AHP, Sunshine
Bridge, vessels must contact VTS New Orleans on VHF Channel 5A to
check-in. Vessels must provide name and destination, confirm proper
operation of their automated identification system (AIS) if required
under 33 CFR 164.46, and, if applicable, size of tow and number of
loaded and empty barges. At 173.7 miles AHP, Bringier Point Light,
ascending vessels must contact VTS New Orleans and provide a follow-on
position check. At both check-in and follow-on position check, VTS New
Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic approaching Eighty-one Mile
Point.
(2) Prior to proceeding downriver past 187.9 miles AHP COS-MAR
Lights, vessels must contact VTS New Orleans on VHF Channel 5A to
check-in. Vessels must provide name and destination, confirm proper
operation of their AIS if required under 33 CFR 164.46, and, if
applicable, size of tow and number of loaded and empty barges. At 183.9
miles AHP, Wyandotte Chemical Dock Lights, descending vessels must
contact VTS New Orleans and provide a follow-on position check. At both
check-in and follow-on position check, VTS New Orleans will advise the
vessel on traffic approaching Eighty-one Mile Point.
(3) All vessels getting underway between miles 167.5 and 187.9 AHP
must check-in with VTS New Orleans on VHF Channel 5A immediately prior
to getting underway and must comply with the respective ascending and
descending check-in and follow-on points listed in paragraphs (e)(1)
and (2) of this section.
(4) Fleet vessels must checkin with VTS New Orleans if they leave
their respective fleet or if they move into the main channel. Fleet
vessels are not required to checkin if they are operating exclusively
within their fleet.
(f) Reporting Points. Table 161.65(f) lists the VTS Lower
Mississippi River Reporting Points.
Table 161.65(f)--VTS Lower Mississippi River Reporting Points
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designator Geographic name Geographic description Latitude/ Longitude/ mile marker Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A................................... Algiers Canal Forebay.. 88.0 AHP 29[deg]56.6' N; 90[deg]10.1' W Upbound transiting
Algiers Point Special
Area.
B................................... Industrial Canal....... 92.7 AHP 29[deg]57.2' N; 90[deg]01.68' W Upbound transiting
Algiers Point Special
Area.
C................................... Crescent Towing Smith 93.5 AHP 29[deg]57.50' N; 90[deg]02.62' W Upbound Towing vessels
Fleet. transiting Algiers
Point Special Area.
D................................... Marlex Terminal (Naval 99.0 AHP 29[deg]54.65' N; 90[deg]05.87' W Downbound transiting
Ships). Algiers Point Special
Area.
E................................... Huey P Long Bridge..... 106.1 AHP 29[deg]55.40' N; 89[deg]57.7' W Downbound transiting
Algiers Point Special
Area.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
6. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
7. In Sec. 165.810--
0
a. Remove and reserve paragraph (c);
0
b. Remove and reserve paragraph (g); and
0
c. Add a note at the end of the section to read as follows:
Sec. 165.810 Mississippi River, LA-regulated navigation area.
* * * * *
Note to Sec. 165.810: Control Light provisions (previously
referenced in paragraph (c) of this section) used to manage vessel
traffic during periods of high waters in the vicinity of Algiers
Point are located in 33 CFR 161.65(c). The special operating
requirements (previously referenced in paragraph (g) of this
section) used to manage vessel traffic in the vicinity of Eighty-one
Mile Point are located in 33 CFR 161.65(e).
Dated: October 22, 2010.
Vincent B. Atkins,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Capabilities.
[FR Doc. 2010-27235 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P