Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company (Type Certificate Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing (Previously the Lancair Company)) Models LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and LC42-550FG Airplanes, 66009-66013 [2010-27212]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
requirements for new Federal buildings
and Federal buildings undergoing major
renovations. The correction is necessary
because the proposed rulemaking
referenced the EA number as (DOE–EA–
1463). The correct EA number in the
NOPR should be (DOE/EA–1778).
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RIN 2120–AA64
Margo Appel, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202) 586–
9495, e-mail: margo.appel@hq.doe.gov,
or Ami Grace-Tardy, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Forrestal Building, GC–71, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–5709,
e-mail: Ami.Grace-Tardy@hq.doe.gov.
The U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) published
a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register on October 15, 2010
(75 FR 63404), announcing a public
meeting and seeking comments
regarding the fossil fuel-generated
energy consumption requirements for
new Federal buildings and major
renovations of Federal buildings.
DOE prepared a draft EA for this
rulemaking. The draft EA has been
added to the docket for this rulemaking.
The NOPR incorrectly referenced the EA
Number as (DOE–EA–1463) on page
63413, third column, fourth paragraph,
third line. The correct EA number in the
NOPR should be (DOE/EA–1778).
For additional information regarding
the NOPR and the public meeting,
including detailed instructions for the
submission of comments and access to
the docket to read background
documents or comments received,
please refer to the October 15, 2010,
notice (75 FR 63404).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 20,
2010.
Joseph Hagerman,
Acting Program Manager, Building
Technologies Program, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010–27152 Filed 10–26–10; 8:45 am]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1186; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–065–AD]
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft
Manufacturing (Previously the Lancair
Company)) Models LC40–550FG,
LC41–550FG, and LC42–550FG
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
We are revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. That
NPRM proposed to retain the inspection
requirements of AD 2009–09–09 and
add a terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements. That
NPRM resulted from the manufacturer
developing a modification that, when
incorporated, would terminate the
repetitive inspections required by AD
2009–09–09. Since we issued the earlier
NPRM, the manufacturer revised the
service information to include
additional airplane serial numbers into
the Effectivity section and revised the
modification kit instructions. This
action revises that NPRM by adding
airplanes to the Applicability section
and incorporating new service
information. We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to retain the
inspection requirements of AD 2009–
09–09 and add a terminating action for
the repetitive inspection requirements
using the revised service information.
Since these actions impose an
additional burden over that proposed in
the NPRM, we are reopening the
comment period to allow the public the
chance to comment on these proposed
changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by December
13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66009
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Cessna Aircraft
Company, Product Support, P.O. Box
7706; Wichita, Kansas 67277; telephone:
(316) 517–5800; fax: (316) 942–9006;
Internet: https://www.cessna.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 816–329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Park, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–
4123; fax: (316) 946–4107; e-mail:
gary.park@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–1186; Directorate Identifier
2009–CE–065–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
66010
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Discussion
We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Cessna Aircraft Company
(Cessna) Models LC40–550FG, LC41–
550FG, and LC42–550FG airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 17, 2009 (74 FR
66927). That NPRM proposed to
supersede AD 2009–09–09 (74 FR
19873, April 30, 2009) with a new AD
that would retain the inspection
requirements of AD 2009–09–09 and
add a terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements.
Actions Since Previous NPRM Was
Issued
Since we issued the previous NPRM,
the manufacturer revised the service
information to include additional
airplane serial numbers into the
Effectivity section and revised the
modification kit instructions.
requirements of AD 2009–09–09 and
adding a terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements using
the revised service information.
Cessna has issued Single Engine
Service Bulletin SB09–27–01, Revision
3, dated July 20, 2010, which describes
procedures for repetitively inspecting
the rudder hinges and the rudder hinge
brackets for damage, i.e., cracking,
deformation, and discoloration. The
service information also describes
procedures for incorporating Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–
07–01A, dated July 20, 2010, which
when incorporated, will terminate the
required repetitive inspections.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
comment on the original NPRM. We
received no comments on that NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this supplemental
NPRM because we evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design. Certain changes described above
expand the scope of the original NPRM.
As a result, we have determined that it
is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional
opportunity for the public to comment
on this supplemental NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 790 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
Proposed Requirements of the
Supplemental NPRM
This supplemental NPRM would
require retaining the inspection
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspecting the rudder hinges and
rudder hinge brackets for damage
with rudder removed (affects 570
airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder hinges and
rudder hinge brackets for damage
without rudder removed (affects
570 airplanes).
Incorporating the modification kit for
Models LC40–550FG and LC42–
550FG airplanes (affects 247 airplanes).
Incorporating the modification kit for
Model LC41–550FG airplanes (affects 523 airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder hinge and the
rudder brackets attachment hardware for correct thread engagement (affects 20 airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder travel (affects
20 airplanes).
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
1.5 work-hours × $85
per hour = $127.50
per inspection cycle.
Not applicable ...............
$127.50 per inspection
cycle.
$72,675 per inspection
cycle.
.5 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $42.50 per inspection cycle.
Not applicable ...............
$42.50 per inspection
cycle.
$24,225 per inspection
cycle.
1 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $85.
$739 ..............................
$824 ..............................
$203,528.
1 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $85.
$848 ..............................
$933 ..............................
$487,959.
.5 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $42.50.
Not applicable ...............
$42.50 ...........................
$850.
1 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $85.
Not applicable ...............
$85 ................................
$1,700.
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs that would be
required based on the results of the
proposed inspection of the rudder hinge
and the rudder brackets attachment
hardware for correct thread engagement
and the rudder travel. We have no way
of determining the number of aircraft
that might need these repairs:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Labor cost
Repair the rudder hinge and the rudder brackets attachment hardware thread engagement (could affect 20 airplanes).
Repair the rudder travel (could affect 20 airplanes) ...........................
.5 work-hour × $85 per hour = $42.50 ...........
$14
$56.50
.5 work-hour × $85 per hour = $42.50 ...........
14
56.50
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Action
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
66011
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Cessna Aircraft Company (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft
Manufacturing (Previously The Lancair
Company)): Docket No. FAA–2009–1186;
Directorate Identifier 2009–CE–065–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 13, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009–09–09,
Amendment 39–15895.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the following Cessna
Aircraft Company (type certificate previously
held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing
(previously The Lancair Company)) airplane
models and serial numbers that are
certificated in any category:
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
GROUP 1 AIRPLANES
Model
Serial Nos.
LC40–550FG (300) ..............
LC41–550FG (400) ..............
40001, 40002, and 40004 through 40079.
41001 through 41569, 41571 through 41800, 411001 through 411087, 411089 through 411110, 411112 through
411138, 411140, 411142, and 411147.
42001 through 42009, 42011 through 42558, 42560 through 42569, 421001 through 421013, 421015 through
421017, and 421019.
LC42–550FG (350) ..............
GROUP 2 AIRPLANES
Model
LC41–550FG (400) ..............
LC42–550FG (350) ..............
Serial Nos.
41570, 411088, 411111, 411139, 411141, 411143 through 411146, and 411148 through 411153.
42010, 42559, 421014, 421018, and 421020.
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component
(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 55, Stabilizers.
the rudder hinges and the rudder hinge
brackets, which could result in failure of the
rudder. This failure could lead to loss of
control.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD is the result of reports received
of a cracked lower rudder hinge bracket on
two of the affected airplanes. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct damage, i.e.,
cracking, deformation, and discoloration, in
Compliance
(f) To address this problem, you must do
the following, unless already done:
(1) For Group 1 airplanes specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD: Using the
compliance times specified in table 1 of this
AD, inspect the rudder hinges and rudder
hinge brackets for damage, i.e., cracking,
deformation, and discoloration. Do the
inspections following Cessna Single Engine
Service Bulletin SB09–27–01, dated April 13,
2009; Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09–27–01, Revision 2, dated November 23,
2009; or Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09–27–01, Revision 3, dated July
20, 2010.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1—INSPECTION COMPLIANCE TIMES
Condition
Initially inspect . . .
Repetitively inspect . . .
(i) For airplanes with 25 hours time-in-service
(TIS) or more as of May 11, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009–09–09):
With the rudder removed and using 10× visual
magnification, inspect all three rudder
hinges and rudder hinge brackets at whichever of the following occurs first:
Thereafter inspect as follows until the modification required in paragraph (f)(5) of this
AD is done:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
66012
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—INSPECTION COMPLIANCE TIMES—Continued
Condition
Initially inspect . . .
Repetitively inspect . . .
(A) Within the next 10 hours TIS after May
11, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009–
09–09); or
(A) Every 25 hours TIS or 3 months, whichever occurs first, without removing the rudder, visually inspect all three rudder hinges
and rudder hinge brackets; and
(B) Every 50 hours TIS or 6 months, whichever occurs first, with the rudder removed
and using 10× visual magnification, inspect
all three rudder hinges and rudder hinge
brackets.
Thereafter inspect as follows until the modification required in paragraph (f)(5) of this
AD is done:
(B) Within the next 30 days after May 11,
2009 (the effective date of AD 009–09–09).
(ii) For airplanes with less than 25 hours TIS as
of May 11, 2009 (the effective date of AD
2009–09–09):
Without removing the rudder, visually inspect
all three rudder hinges and rudder hinge
brackets, at whichever of the following occurs later:
(A) Upon accumulating 25 hours TIS; or .........
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(B) Within the next 10 hours TIS after May
11, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009–
09–09).
(2) For Group 1 airplanes specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD: Before further flight
after any inspection required in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD in which
damage is found on any of the rudder hinges
and/or rudder hinge brackets, incorporate
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400–27–01, dated November 23, 2009; or
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400–27–01A dated July 20, 2010, as
specified in Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09–27–01, Revision 2, dated
November 23, 2009; and Cessna Single
Engine Service Bulletin SB09–27–01,
Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010. Incorporating
either Modification Kit MK400–27–01 or
Modification Kit MK400–27–01A, terminates
the repetitive inspections required in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(3) For Group 1 airplanes specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD: If the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i)
and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD become due at the
same time, credit for both inspections will be
given by doing the rudder removal and 10×
visual inspection.
(4) For Group 1 airplanes specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD: Within the next 24
months after the effective date of this AD,
incorporate Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400–27–01, dated
November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400–27–01A, dated July
20, 2010, as specified in Cessna Single
Engine Service Bulletin SB09–27–01,
Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009; and
Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09–
27–01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010,
unless already done as specified in paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD. Incorporating either
Modification Kit MK400–27–01 or
Modification Kit MK400–27–01A, terminates
the repetitive inspections required in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(5) For Group 1 airplanes specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD: At any time after
the initial inspections required in paragraphs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as long as no
damage is found, and no later than the
compliance time specified in paragraph (f)(4)
of this AD, you may incorporate Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01A, dated July 20, 2010, as specified in
Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09–
27–01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009;
and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09–27–01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010,
to terminate the repetitive inspections
required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of
this AD.
(6) For any Group 1 airplane with Cessna
Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09–27–01,
Revision 1, dated August 31, 2009, already
incorporated and for all Group 2 airplanes:
Within the next 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, inspect for proper rudder
hinge and rudder bracket hardware thread
engagement and inspect the rudder travel. Do
these inspections following the
Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01, dated November 23, 2009; or the
Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01A, dated July 20, 2010.
(i) Before further flight after the inspection
required in paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if any
discrepancies are found in the rudder hinge
or rudder bracket hardware, replace the
affected hardware. Do the replacements
following the Accomplishment Instructions
in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400–27–01, dated November 23, 2009; or
the Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01A, dated July 20, 2010.
(ii) Before further flight after the inspection
required in paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if the
rudder travel is outside the limits specified
in the Accomplishment Instructions in
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400–27–01, dated November 23, 2009; or
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(A) Every 25 hours TIS or 3 months, whichever occurs first, without removing the rudder, visually inspect all three rudder hinges
and rudder hinge brackets; and
(B) Every 50 hours TIS or 6 months, whichever occurs first, with the rudder removed
and using 10× visual magnification, inspect
all three rudder hinges and rudder hinge
brackets.
the Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400–27–
01A, dated July 20, 2010, reinstall the rudder
following the Accomplishment Instructions
in either Cessna Single Engine Modification
Kit MK400–27–01, dated November 23, 2009;
or Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400–27–01A, dated July 20, 2010.
(iii) After the inspection and any necessary
corrective actions required in paragraphs
(f)(6), (f)(6)(i), and (f)(6)(ii) of this AD, no
further action is required.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(g) For all airplanes specified in paragraph
(c) of this AD: As of the effective date of this
AD, if Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09–27–01, Revision 2, dated November 23,
2009, has been already been incorporated, no
further action is required.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your Principal Maintenance Inspector
or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 2009–09–09
are approved for this AD.
Related Information
(i) For more information about this AD,
contact Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road,
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:
(316) 946–4123; fax: (316) 946–4107; e-mail:
gary.park@faa.gov.
(j) For service information identified in this
AD, contact Cessna Aircraft Company,
Product Support, P.O. Box 7706; Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone: (316) 517–5800;
fax: (316) 942–9006; Internet: https://
www.cessna.com. You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 816–329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 21, 2010.
Christina L. Marsh,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–27212 Filed 10–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0843; Airspace
Docket No. 10–ASW–12]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Horseshoe Bay, TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class E airspace at Horseshoe
Bay, TX. Decommissioning of the
Horseshoe Bay Resort non-directional
beacon (NDB) at Horseshoe Bay Resort
Airport, Horseshoe Bay, TX, has made
this action necessary for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be
received on or before December 13,
2010.
SUMMARY:
Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must
identify the docket number FAA–2010–
0843/Airspace Docket No. 10–ASW–12,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Oct 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
5527), is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321–
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2010–0843/Airspace
Docket No. 10–ASW–12.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/
air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham
Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66013
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), part 71 by modifying Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for standard
instrument approach procedures at
Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport,
Horseshoe Bay, TX. Airspace
reconfiguration is necessary due to the
decommissioning of the Horseshoe Bay
Resort NDB and the cancellation of the
NDB approach. This action would also
reflect the name change of the airport
from Horseshoe Bay Airpark to
Horseshoe Bay Resort Airport.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the
safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and
effective September 15, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart
I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to assign the use of airspace
necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft
and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify controlled
airspace at Horseshoe Bay Resort
Airport, Horseshoe Bay, TX.
E:\FR\FM\27OCP1.SGM
27OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66009-66013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27212]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1186; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-065-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing
(Previously the Lancair Company)) Models LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and
LC42-550FG Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for the products listed above. That NPRM proposed to retain the
inspection requirements of AD 2009-09-09 and add a terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements. That NPRM resulted from the
manufacturer developing a modification that, when incorporated, would
terminate the repetitive inspections required by AD 2009-09-09. Since
we issued the earlier NPRM, the manufacturer revised the service
information to include additional airplane serial numbers into the
Effectivity section and revised the modification kit instructions. This
action revises that NPRM by adding airplanes to the Applicability
section and incorporating new service information. We are proposing
this supplemental NPRM to retain the inspection requirements of AD
2009-09-09 and add a terminating action for the repetitive inspection
requirements using the revised service information. Since these actions
impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment
on these proposed changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by December
13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Cessna
Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706; Wichita, Kansas
67277; telephone: (316) 517-5800; fax: (316) 942-9006; Internet: https://www.cessna.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 816-329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4123; fax: (316) 946-4107;
e-mail: gary.park@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1186;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-065-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
[[Page 66010]]
Discussion
We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an
airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to certain Cessna
Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and LC42-550FG
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December
17, 2009 (74 FR 66927). That NPRM proposed to supersede AD 2009-09-09
(74 FR 19873, April 30, 2009) with a new AD that would retain the
inspection requirements of AD 2009-09-09 and add a terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements.
Actions Since Previous NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the previous NPRM, the manufacturer revised the
service information to include additional airplane serial numbers into
the Effectivity section and revised the modification kit instructions.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the original NPRM.
We received no comments on that NPRM or on the determination of the
cost to the public.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this supplemental NPRM because we evaluated all
the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the
original NPRM. As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to
reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the
public to comment on this supplemental NPRM.
Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM
This supplemental NPRM would require retaining the inspection
requirements of AD 2009-09-09 and adding a terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements using the revised service
information.
Cessna has issued Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01,
Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010, which describes procedures for
repetitively inspecting the rudder hinges and the rudder hinge brackets
for damage, i.e., cracking, deformation, and discoloration. The service
information also describes procedures for incorporating Cessna Single
Engine Modification Kit MK400-07-01A, dated July 20, 2010, which when
incorporated, will terminate the required repetitive inspections.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 790 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspecting the rudder hinges and 1.5 work-hours x Not applicable.... $127.50 per $72,675 per
rudder hinge brackets for $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
damage with rudder removed $127.50 per
(affects 570 airplanes). inspection cycle.
Inspecting the rudder hinges and .5 work-hour x $85 Not applicable.... $42.50 per $24,225 per
rudder hinge brackets for per hour = $42.50 inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
damage without rudder removed per inspection
(affects 570 airplanes). cycle.
Incorporating the modification 1 work-hour x $85 $739.............. $824.............. $203,528.
kit for Models LC40-550FG and per hour = $85.
LC42-550FG airplanes (affects
247 airplanes).
Incorporating the modification 1 work-hour x $85 $848.............. $933.............. $487,959.
kit for Model LC41-550FG per hour = $85.
airplanes (affects 523
airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder hinge and .5 work-hour x $85 Not applicable.... $42.50............ $850.
the rudder brackets attachment per hour = $42.50.
hardware for correct thread
engagement (affects 20
airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder travel 1 work-hour x $85 Not applicable.... $85............... $1,700.
(affects 20 airplanes). per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection of
the rudder hinge and the rudder brackets attachment hardware for
correct thread engagement and the rudder travel. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that might need these repairs:
On-Condition Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair the rudder hinge and .5 work-hour x $14 $56.50
the rudder brackets $85 per hour =
attachment hardware thread $42.50.
engagement (could affect 20
airplanes).
Repair the rudder travel .5 work-hour x 14 56.50
(could affect 20 airplanes). $85 per hour =
$42.50.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
[[Page 66011]]
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Cessna Aircraft Company (Type Certificate Previously Held by
Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing (Previously The Lancair Company)):
Docket No. FAA-2009-1186; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-065-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 13, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-09-09, Amendment 39-15895.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the following Cessna Aircraft Company
(type certificate previously held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing
(previously The Lancair Company)) airplane models and serial numbers
that are certificated in any category:
Group 1 Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LC40-550FG (300)............. 40001, 40002, and 40004 through 40079.
LC41-550FG (400)............. 41001 through 41569, 41571 through 41800,
411001 through 411087, 411089 through
411110, 411112 through 411138, 411140,
411142, and 411147.
LC42-550FG (350)............. 42001 through 42009, 42011 through 42558,
42560 through 42569, 421001 through
421013, 421015 through 421017, and
421019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 2 Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LC41-550FG (400)............. 41570, 411088, 411111, 411139, 411141,
411143 through 411146, and 411148
through 411153.
LC42-550FG (350)............. 42010, 42559, 421014, 421018, and 421020.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject
(d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD is the result of reports received of a cracked lower
rudder hinge bracket on two of the affected airplanes. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct damage, i.e., cracking,
deformation, and discoloration, in the rudder hinges and the rudder
hinge brackets, which could result in failure of the rudder. This
failure could lead to loss of control.
Compliance
(f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:
(1) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
Using the compliance times specified in table 1 of this AD, inspect
the rudder hinges and rudder hinge brackets for damage, i.e.,
cracking, deformation, and discoloration. Do the inspections
following Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, dated
April 13, 2009; Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01,
Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010.
Table 1--Inspection Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initially inspect . Repetitively inspect
Condition . . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) For airplanes with 25 With the rudder Thereafter inspect
hours time-in-service (TIS) removed and using as follows until
or more as of May 11, 2009 10x visual the modification
(the effective date of AD magnification, required in
2009-09-09): inspect all three paragraph (f)(5) of
rudder hinges and this AD is done:
rudder hinge
brackets at
whichever of the
following occurs
first:
[[Page 66012]]
(A) Within the next (A) Every 25 hours
10 hours TIS after TIS or 3 months,
May 11, 2009 (the whichever occurs
effective date of first, without
AD 2009-09-09); or removing the
rudder, visually
inspect all three
rudder hinges and
rudder hinge
brackets; and
(B) Within the next (B) Every 50 hours
30 days after May TIS or 6 months,
11, 2009 (the whichever occurs
effective date of first, with the
AD 009-09-09). rudder removed and
using 10x visual
magnification,
inspect all three
rudder hinges and
rudder hinge
brackets.
(ii) For airplanes with less Without removing the Thereafter inspect
than 25 hours TIS as of May rudder, visually as follows until
11, 2009 (the effective inspect all three the modification
date of AD 2009-09-09): rudder hinges and required in
rudder hinge paragraph (f)(5) of
brackets, at this AD is done:
whichever of the
following occurs
later:
(A) Upon (A) Every 25 hours
accumulating 25 TIS or 3 months,
hours TIS; or. whichever occurs
first, without
removing the
rudder, visually
inspect all three
rudder hinges and
rudder hinge
brackets; and
(B) Within the next (B) Every 50 hours
10 hours TIS after TIS or 6 months,
May 11, 2009 (the whichever occurs
effective date of first, with the
AD 2009-09-09). rudder removed and
using 10x visual
magnification,
inspect all three
rudder hinges and
rudder hinge
brackets.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this
AD: Before further flight after any inspection required in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD in which damage is
found on any of the rudder hinges and/or rudder hinge brackets,
incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated
November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-
27-01A dated July 20, 2010, as specified in Cessna Single Engine
Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009;
and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3,
dated July 20, 2010. Incorporating either Modification Kit MK400-27-
01 or Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, terminates the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
(3) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
If the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD become due at the same time, credit for both
inspections will be given by doing the rudder removal and 10x visual
inspection.
(4) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
Within the next 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated
November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-
27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, as specified in Cessna Single Engine
Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009;
and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3,
dated July 20, 2010, unless already done as specified in paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD. Incorporating either Modification Kit MK400-27-01
or Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, terminates the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
(5) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
At any time after the initial inspections required in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as long as no damage is found,
and no later than the compliance time specified in paragraph (f)(4)
of this AD, you may incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification
Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, as specified in
Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated
November 23, 2009; and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-
27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010, to terminate the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
(6) For any Group 1 airplane with Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 1, dated August 31, 2009, already
incorporated and for all Group 2 airplanes: Within the next 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, inspect for proper rudder hinge
and rudder bracket hardware thread engagement and inspect the rudder
travel. Do these inspections following the Accomplishment
Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01,
dated November 23, 2009; or the Accomplishment Instructions in
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20,
2010.
(i) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if any discrepancies are found in the
rudder hinge or rudder bracket hardware, replace the affected
hardware. Do the replacements following the Accomplishment
Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01,
dated November 23, 2009; or the Accomplishment Instructions in
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20,
2010.
(ii) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if the rudder travel is outside the
limits specified in the Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna Single
Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or the
Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, reinstall the rudder following
the Accomplishment Instructions in either Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010.
(iii) After the inspection and any necessary corrective actions
required in paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(6)(i), and (f)(6)(ii) of this AD,
no further action is required.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(g) For all airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD: As
of the effective date of this AD, if Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009, has been
already been incorporated, no further action is required.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your Principal
Maintenance Inspector or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 2009-09-09 are approved for this AD.
Related Information
(i) For more information about this AD, contact Gary Park,
Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road,
[[Page 66013]]
Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4123; fax:
(316) 946-4107; e-mail: gary.park@faa.gov.
(j) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706; Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone: (316) 517-5800; fax: (316) 942-9006;
Internet: https://www.cessna.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
816-329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 21, 2010.
Christina L. Marsh,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-27212 Filed 10-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P